Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko. Basic Geophysical Concepts



Similar documents
7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Reservoir Modelling and Interpretation with Lamé s Parameters: A Grand Banks Case Study

Hydrocarbon reservoir modeling: comparison between theoretical and real petrophysical properties from the Namorado Field (Brazil) case study.

Parameters That Influence Seismic Velocity Conceptual Overview of Rock and Fluid Factors that Impact Seismic Velocity and Impedance

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

Eagle Ford Shale Exploration Regional Geology meets Geophysical Technology. Galen Treadgold Bruce Campbell Bill McLain

Which physics for full-wavefield seismic inversion?

Integration of reservoir simulation with time-lapse seismic modelling

Pore Radius and Permeability Prediction from Sonic Velocity

Shuey s Two-Term Approximation

16. THE SONIC OR ACOUSTIC LOG 16.1 Introduction

Tutorial. Phase, polarity and the interpreter s wavelet. tutorial. Rob Simm 1 & Roy White 2

Periodical meeting CO2Monitor. Leakage characterization at the Sleipner injection site

DecisionSpace. Prestack Calibration and Analysis Software. DecisionSpace Geosciences DATA SHEET

Marine broadband seismic: Is the earth response helping the resolution revolution? N. Woodburn*, A. Hardwick, and R. Herring, TGS

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION

Tight Gas Reservoir Characterization

Developing integrated amplitude driven solutions for pore content prediction through effective collaboration

Because rock is heterogeneous at all scales, it is often invalid

Brief Review of Global Earth Velocity Structures and Seismology

Introduction to Petroleum Geology and Geophysics

GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANTALYA KARSTIC ROCK MASSES

EarthStudy 360. Full-Azimuth Angle Domain Imaging and Analysis

Waves - Transverse and Longitudinal Waves

Frio Formation of the Gulf Coast* By Michael D. Burnett 1 and John P. Castagna 2

Sonic Logging in Deviated Boreholes of an Anisotropic Formation: Laboratory Study

FAN group includes NAMVARAN UPSTREAM,

Mechanical Properties - Stresses & Strains

WELL LOGGING TECHNIQUES WELL LOGGING DEPARTMENT OIL INDIA LIMITED

Figure 2-10: Seismic Well Ties for Correlation and Modelling. Table 2-2: Taglu Mapped Seismic Horizons

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

Mechanical Properties of Metals Mechanical Properties refers to the behavior of material when external forces are applied

Development of EM simulator for sea bed logging applications using MATLAB

Full azimuth angle domain decomposition and imaging: A comprehensive solution for anisotropic velocity model determination and fracture detection

A Time b). Redatuming Direct with Ghost by Correlation T AB + T BC

Vibrations of a Free-Free Beam

For Water to Move a driving force is needed

Chapter Outline. Mechanical Properties of Metals How do metals respond to external loads?

Th Salt Exit Velocity Retrieval Using Full-waveform Inversion

Spectroscopic Ellipsometry:

Seismic Waves Practice

Travel Time Modelling using Gamma Ray and Resistivity Log in Sand Shale Sequence of Gandhar Field

Investigation of the Effect of Dynamic Capillary Pressure on Waterflooding in Extra Low Permeability Reservoirs

Nonlinear inversion for estimating reservoir parameters from time-lapse seismic data

INF-GEO Introduction to seismic processing and imaging. Copyright Leiv-J. Gelius/GeoCLASS

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

2.016 Hydrodynamics Reading # Hydrodynamics Prof. A.H. Techet

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

14TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE BRAZILIAN GEOPHYSICAL SOCIETY AND EXPOGEF

BIOMEDICAL ULTRASOUND

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

Antenna A mean for radiating and receiving radio waves Transitional structure between free-space and a guiding device. Application: Radiation

3D-3C Seismic data acquisition survey design and implementation: A case study NAS Block, A & AA Basin

Optical Fibres. Introduction. Safety precautions. For your safety. For the safety of the apparatus

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

Elasticity Theory Basics

Building 1D reference velocity model of the Irpinia region (Southern Apennines): microearthquakes locations and focal mechanism

Basic Principles in Microfluidics

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Study Over Specific Medium

Barometric Effects on Transducer Data and Groundwater Levels in Monitoring Wells D.A. Wardwell, October 2007

Tu Slanted-Streamer Acquisition - Broadband Case Studies in Europe / Africa

Introduction to Seismology Spring 2008

CE 204 FLUID MECHANICS

Hunting Bats. Diagnostic Ultrasound. Ultrasound Real-time modality

EARTHQUAKES. Compressional Tensional Slip-strike

Converted-waves imaging condition for elastic reverse-time migration Yuting Duan and Paul Sava, Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines

Figure CPT Equipment

Unconventional Challenges: Integrated Analysis for Unconventional Resource Development Robert Gales VP Resource Development

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

ABAQUS Tutorial. 3D Modeling

Measurement of the Acoustic Properties of Acoustic Absorbers

Annealing Techniques for Data Integration

TRAVELING WAVE EFFECTS ON NONLINEAR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE GRAVITY DAMS

3D Geomechanical Modeling In The Vaca Muerta Shale: A Predictive Tool For Horizontal Well Landing And Completion Strategy

Broadband seismic to support hydrocarbon exploration on the UK Continental Shelf

Guidelines: Reporting & Requirements for Geoscience Programs & Operations

Figure 1: 3D realisation of AST electrode firing head discarging high voltage charge within borehole.

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Search and Discovery Article #40256 (2007) Posted September 5, Abstract

The elements used in commercial codes can be classified in two basic categories:

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

Reflectance Characteristics of Accuflect Light Reflecting Ceramic

ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFICATE LEVEL

Solution for Homework #1

01 The Nature of Fluids

1 Wetting your feet. 2 Scaling Lies / Check your understanding: Solutions

General. Type of porosity logs

Earthquake Magnitude

A fundamental study of the flow past a circular cylinder using Abaqus/CFD

v = fλ PROGRESSIVE WAVES 1 Candidates should be able to :

Laterally Loaded Piles

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

Transcription:

Basic Geophysical Concepts 14

Body wave velocities have form: velocity= V P = V S = V E = K + (4 /3)µ ρ µ ρ E ρ = λ + µ ρ where ρ density K bulk modulus = 1/compressibility µ shear modulus λ Lamé's coefficient E Young's modulus ν Poisson's ratio M P-wave modulus = K + (4/3) µ modulus density P wave velocity S wave velocity E wave velocity Moduli from velocities: µ = ρv S M = ρv P In terms of Poisson's ratio we can also write: K = ρ V P 4 3 V S E = ρv E ( ) V P V = 1 v S (1 v) V E V = ( 1+ v)(1 v) P (1 v) v = V P V S (V P V S ) = V E V S V S Relating various velocities: V P V S = 4 V E V S 3 V E V S V E V S = 3 V P V 4 S V P V 1 S 15

We usually quantify Rock Physics relations in terms of moduli and velocities, but in the field we might look for travel time or Reflectivity ρ 1 V 1 ρ V The reflection coefficient of a normally-incident P- wave on a boundary is given by: where ρv is the acoustic impedance. Therefore, anything that causes a large contrast in impedance can cause a large reflection. Candidates include: Changes in lithology Changes in porosity Changes in saturation Diagenesis R = ρ V ρ 1 V 1 ρ V +ρ 1 V 1 16

AVO Amplitude Variation with Offset V P1, V S1, ρ 1 θ 1 φ 1 Reflected S-wave Deepwater Oil Sand Incident P-wave Reflected P-wave Transmitted P-wave φ θ V P, V S, ρ Transmitted S-wave N.4 Recorded CMP Gather Synthetic In an isotropic medium, a wave that is incident on a boundary will generally create two reflected waves (one P and one S) and two transmitted waves. The total shear traction acting on the boundary in medium 1 (due to the summed effects of the incident an reflected waves) must be equal to the total shear traction acting on the boundary in medium (due to the summed effects of the transmitted waves). Also the displacement of a point in medium 1 at the boundary must be equal to the displacement of a point in medium at the boundary. 17

AVO - Aki-Richards approximation: P-wave reflectivity versus incident angle: Intercept R(θ) R 0 + 1 + 1 V P V P R 0 1 V P V P V P V P + ρ ρ Gradient V S ρ V P ρ + V S V S sin θ [ tan θ sin θ] In principle, AVO gives us information about Vp, Vs, and density. These are critical for optimal Rock Physics interpretation. We ll see later the unique role of P- and S-wave information for separating lithology, pressure, and saturation. 18

Seismic Amplitudes Many factors influence seismic amplitude: Source coupling Source radiation pattern Receiver response, coupling, and pattern Scattering and Intrinsic Attenuation Sperical divergence Focusing Anisotropy Statics, moveout, migration, decon, DMO Angle of Incidence Reflection coefficient Source Rcvr 19

Intervals or Interfaces? Crossplots or Wiggles? Rock physics analysis is usually applied to intervals, where we can find fairly universal relations of acoustic properties to fluids, lithology, porosity, rock texture, etc. Interval Vp vs. Phi Interval Vp vs. Vs In contrast, seismic wiggles depend on interval boundaries and contrasts. This introduces countless variations in geometry, wavelet, etc. A B 0

Impedance vs. depth Convolutional Model Reflectivity Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko Normal Incidence Seismic Rock properties in each small layer Derivatives of layer properties Convolve With wavelet Smoothed image of derivative of impedance Normal incidence reflection seismograms can be approximated with the convolutional model. Reflectivity sequence is approximately the derivative of the impedance: R(t) 1 d dt ln ( ρv ) Seismic trace is smoothed with the wavelet: S(t) w(t) R(t) Be careful of US vs. European polarity conventions! 1

Inversion Stanford Rock Physics Laboratory - Gary Mavko Two quantitative strategies to link interval rock properties with seismic: Forward modeling Inversion We have had great success in applying rock physics to interval properties. For the most part, applying RP directly to the seismic wiggles, requires a modeling or inversion step. We often choose a model-based study, calibrated to logs (when possible) to Diagnose formation properties Explore situations not seen in the wells Quantify signatures and sensitivities

The Rock Physics Bottleneck At any point in the Earth, there are only 3 (possibly 4) acoustic properties: Vp, Vs, density, (and Q). No matter how many seismic attributes we observe, inversions can only give us three acoustic attributes Others yield spatial or geometric information. Seismic Attributes Traveltime Vnmo Vp/Vs Ip,Is Ro, G AI, EI Q anisotropy etc Acoustic Properties Vp Vs Density Q Reservoir Properties Porosity Saturation Pressure Lithology Pressure Stress Temp. Etc. 3

Problem of Resolution Log-scale rock physics may be different than seismic scale 4

Seismic properties (velocity, impedance, Poisson Ratio, etc) depend on pore pressure and stress Units of Stress: 1 bar = 10 6 dyne/cm = 14.50 psi 10 bar = 1 MPa = 10 6 N/m 1 Pa = 1 N/m = 1.45 10-4 psi = 10-5 bar 1000 kpa = 10 bar = 1 MPa Stress always has units of force/area Mudweight to Pressure Gradient 1 psi/ft = 144 lb/ft 3 = 19.4 lb/gal =.5 kpa/m 1 lb/gal = 0.05 psi/ft 5