Chapter 7: Answers to Questions and Problems



Similar documents
Problem Set 3. a) We are asked how people will react, if the interest rate i on bonds is negative.

Recap. Duopoly models. ! Last class (January 13, 2004) ! Today (January 15, 2004) ! Two competing firms, selling a homogeneous good

Addendum to: Importing Skill-Biased Technology

reduce competition increase market power cost savings economies of scale and scope cost savings Oliver Williamson: the efficiency defense

Institute of Informatics, Faculty of Business and Management, Brno University of Technology,Czech Republic

Oligopoly Theory Made Simple

Luby s Alg. for Maximal Independent Sets using Pairwise Independence

Medium and long term. Equilibrium models approach

Answer: A). There is a flatter IS curve in the high MPC economy. Original LM LM after increase in M. IS curve for low MPC economy

Structural Estimation of Variety Gains from Trade Integration in a Heterogeneous Firms Framework

Production. 2. Y is closed A set is closed if it contains its boundary. We need this for the solution existence in the profit maximization problem.

Power-of-Two Policies for Single- Warehouse Multi-Retailer Inventory Systems with Order Frequency Discounts

benefit is 2, paid if the policyholder dies within the year, and probability of death within the year is ).

DEFINING %COMPLETE IN MICROSOFT PROJECT

1 Example 1: Axis-aligned rectangles

Results from the Dixit/Stiglitz monopolistic competition model

Chapter 4 ECONOMIC DISPATCH AND UNIT COMMITMENT

How Large are the Gains from Economic Integration? Theory and Evidence from U.S. Agriculture,

THE DISTRIBUTION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO VALUE * Oldrich Alfons Vasicek

Game theory in Oligopoly

Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises. Online Appendix May Appendix A: Derivation of Equations for Productivity

Feature selection for intrusion detection. Slobodan Petrović NISlab, Gjøvik University College

How To Calculate The Accountng Perod Of Nequalty

17 Capital tax competition

Rate Monotonic (RM) Disadvantages of cyclic. TDDB47 Real Time Systems. Lecture 2: RM & EDF. Priority-based scheduling. States of a process

Recurrence. 1 Definitions and main statements

Portfolio Loss Distribution

Efficient Project Portfolio as a tool for Enterprise Risk Management

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION

IS-LM Model 1 C' dy = di

The Choice of Direct Dealing or Electronic Brokerage in Foreign Exchange Trading

8.5 UNITARY AND HERMITIAN MATRICES. The conjugate transpose of a complex matrix A, denoted by A*, is given by

Causal, Explanatory Forecasting. Analysis. Regression Analysis. Simple Linear Regression. Which is Independent? Forecasting

Pricing Model of Cloud Computing Service with Partial Multihoming

Module 2 LOSSLESS IMAGE COMPRESSION SYSTEMS. Version 2 ECE IIT, Kharagpur

Linear Circuits Analysis. Superposition, Thevenin /Norton Equivalent circuits

v a 1 b 1 i, a 2 b 2 i,..., a n b n i.

SPEE Recommended Evaluation Practice #6 Definition of Decline Curve Parameters Background:

Modelling the Cocaine and Heroin Markets in the Era of Globalization and Drug Reduction Policies Claudia Costa Storti and Paul De Grauwe

7.5. Present Value of an Annuity. Investigate

1. Measuring association using correlation and regression

Activity Scheduling for Cost-Time Investment Optimization in Project Management

The OC Curve of Attribute Acceptance Plans

Joe Pimbley, unpublished, Yield Curve Calculations

Elements of Advanced International Trade 1

Depreciation of Business R&D Capital

Mathematics of Finance

The circuit shown on Figure 1 is called the common emitter amplifier circuit. The important subsystems of this circuit are:

Using Series to Analyze Financial Situations: Present Value

How To Compare Frm To An Isac

Nordea G10 Alpha Carry Index

An Alternative Way to Measure Private Equity Performance

UK Letter Mail Demand: a Content Based Time Series Analysis using Overlapping Market Survey Statistical Techniques

The Greedy Method. Introduction. 0/1 Knapsack Problem

On the Optimal Control of a Cascade of Hydro-Electric Power Stations

A DYNAMIC CRASHING METHOD FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT USING SIMULATION-BASED OPTIMIZATION. Michael E. Kuhl Radhamés A. Tolentino-Peña

Logical Development Of Vogel s Approximation Method (LD-VAM): An Approach To Find Basic Feasible Solution Of Transportation Problem

The Development of Web Log Mining Based on Improve-K-Means Clustering Analysis

Retailers must constantly strive for excellence in operations; extremely narrow profit margins

Supply network formation as a biform game

Support Vector Machines

UTILIZING MATPOWER IN OPTIMAL POWER FLOW

Prices and price-cost margins of mobile voice services *

Equlbra Exst and Trade S effcent proportionally

Solution: Let i = 10% and d = 5%. By definition, the respective forces of interest on funds A and B are. i 1 + it. S A (t) = d (1 dt) 2 1. = d 1 dt.

Allocating Collaborative Profit in Less-than-Truckload Carrier Alliance

Price Competition in an Oligopoly Market with Multiple IaaS Cloud Providers

Project Networks With Mixed-Time Constraints

Risk-based Fatigue Estimate of Deep Water Risers -- Course Project for EM388F: Fracture Mechanics, Spring 2008

Marginal Revenue-Based Capacity Management Models and Benchmark 1

行 政 院 國 家 科 學 委 員 會 補 助 專 題 研 究 計 畫 成 果 報 告 期 中 進 度 報 告

Hedging Interest-Rate Risk with Duration

Leveraged Firms, Patent Licensing, and Limited Liability

Is Thailand s Fiscal System Pro-Poor?: Looking from Income and Expenditure Components. Hyun Hwa Son

Number of Levels Cumulative Annual operating Income per year construction costs costs ($) ($) ($) 1 600,000 35, , ,200,000 60, ,000

Can Auto Liability Insurance Purchases Signal Risk Attitude?

Chapter 5: Tariffs and Quotas. An import tariff is a tax on the imported goods, levied as goods pass into the

Availability-Based Path Selection and Network Vulnerability Assessment

In our example i = r/12 =.0825/12 At the end of the first month after your payment is received your amount in the account, the balance, is

Interest Rate Futures

n + d + q = 24 and.05n +.1d +.25q = 2 { n + d + q = 24 (3) n + 2d + 5q = 40 (2)

Transcription:

19. Based on the nformaton contaned n Table 7-3 of the text, the food and apparel ndustres are most compettve and therefore probably represent the best match for the expertse of these managers. Chapter 7: Answers to Questons and Problems Answerkey ProblemSet3 1. The four-frm concentraton rato s, $175, 000 $150, 000 $15, 000 $100, 000 C4 " " 0.55. $1,000,000 Chapter7. a. The HHI s " # $00, 000 $ # $400, 000 $ # $500, 000 $ HHI " 10, 000 %' =3,719 ( ' & ( ' (. % + ) * ) * ) * &, b. The four-frm concentraton rato s 100 percent. c. If the frms wth sales of $00,000 and $400,000 were allowed to merge, the resultng HHI would ncrease by 1,3 to 5,041. Snce the pre-merger HHI exceeds that under the Gudelnes (1,800) and the HHI ncreases by more than that permtted under the Gudelnes (100), the merger s lkely to be challenged. 3. The elastcty of demand for a representatve frm n the ndustry s 1.5, snce # 0.9 # 0.9 0.6 " - EF " " # 1.5.. E 0.6 4. F a. $100. To see ths, solve the Lerner ndex formula for P to obtan 1 1 P " # ' $ ( MC " # ' $ ( $35 " $100. ) 1 # L * ) 1 # 0.65 * # 1 $ # 1 $ b. Snce P " ' ( MC, t follows that the markup factor s ' ( ".86. ) 1 # L * ) 1 # 0.65 * That s, the prce charged by the frm s.86 tmes the margnal cost of producng the product. c. The above calculatons suggest prce competton s not very rgorous and that the frm enjoys market power. 5. Managers should not specalze n learnng to manage a partcular type of market 17. structure. Market structure generally evolves over tme, and managers must adapt to See Table 7-1. these changes. Own Prce Elastcty 6. To the extent that the HHIs are based on too narrow a defnton of the product (or of Demand for geographc) market or the Own mpact Prce Elastcty of foregn of competton, Representatve Frm's the merger mght be allowed. It mght also be allowed Market Demand f one of the frms Product s n fnancal Rothschld trouble, Index or f sgnfcant economes of scale exst n the ndustry. Agrculture -1.8-96. 0.019 Constructon -1.0-5. 0.19 Durable manufacturng -1.4-3.5 0.400 Nondurable manufacturng -1.3-3.4 0.38 Transportaton -1.0-1.9 0.56 Communcaton and utltes -1. -1.8 0.667 Manageral Economcs and Busness Strategy, 7e Page 1 Wholesale trade -1.5-1.6 0.938 Retal trade -1. -1.8 0.667 Fnance -0.1-5.5 0.018 Servces -1. -6.4 0.045 Table 7-1 Based on the Rothschld ndces n Table 7-1, wholesale trade most closely resembles a monopoly, whle fnance most closely resembles perfect competton. P MC $3 $0.30 18. The Lerner ndex s L " " " 0.9, whch ndcates the frm has P $3 consderable market power. Ths makes sense because the product that the frm sells s currently under patent protecton, whch essentally makes the frm a legal monopoly.

mnmum % E of & ts AVC curve. % ".5 Here, & MC 50 " 8q # 3q and 3. your frm can ncrease profts by reducng prce n order to sell more plls. 3 50q " 4q # q a. AVC 7 unts. 50 " 4q # q. Snce MC and AVC are equal at the 15. Notce b. $130. that MR = 1,000 q 10Q, MC 1 = 10Q 1 and MC = 4Q. In order to maxmze profts c. mnmum $140, (or snce mnmze pont ($130 of ts AVC, 110) losses), set x 7 MC the = $140. frm = AVC equates to get MR 50= " MC 8q 1 # and 3q MR 50=MC " 4q.# Snce q, Q = d. Q 1 Ths frm s demand wll decrease over tme as new frms enter the market. In the Chapter8 or + q Q, ths. Thus, gves AVC us s mnmzed at an output of unts, and the correspondng long-run, economc profts 1000 wll shrnk " 10$ Qto zero. AVC s $ % $ % 1 Q % # 10Q1 AVC 50 " 4 # 46. Thus the frm s. supply curve s descrbed 4. 1000 " 10$ Q1 Q % # 4Q by the equaton MC 50 " 8q # 3q f P & $46 ; otherwse, the frm produces a. MR = 00 4Q and MC = 6Q. Settng MR = MC yelds 00 4Q = 6Q. Solvng Solvng zero yelds yelds unts. Q = 0 Q unts. # 00 1 The. proft-maxmzng prce s obtaned by pluggng ths nto b. A the monopolst demand equaton produces 9 & unts and Q # 500 & 55.56 unts. The optmal prce to where get P = MR 00 = - MC (0) and = $160. thus 9 does not have a supply curve. c. b. A Revenues monopolstcally are R = ($160)(0) compettve = $300 frm produces and costs where 00 are C MR 500 = 000 = MC 700 + 3(0) and thus = $300, does not s the amount consumers wll pay for the Q1 Q # # & 77.78 unts, have so the a frm s supply profts curve. are zero. 9 9 9 and c. s Elastc. determned by the nverse demand curve: 6. d. TR s maxmzed 700 " when $5, 500 MR = 0. Settng MR = 0 yelds 00 4Q = 0. Solvng for a. P # Q 1, Q = 000 yelds 3 unts; " 5 Q # = P 50 = $70. $ unts. # The prce & $611.11 at ths. output At ths s prce P = 00 and output, (50) = revenues $100. are R = b. e. Q Usng = 4 unts; % the results P 9 = $60. & 9 from part d, the frm s maxmum revenues are R = ($100)(50) = ($611.11)(77.78) c. DWL $5,000. 1 = $47,53.14, whle costs are $ $70 " $40 % $ 1 % $15. Cf. 1 Unt C # elastc. $ 10, 050 5$.% % $ 5, 000 $ 55.56 % % # $3,69.47. The frm thus 7. earns profts of $3,839.67. a. The nverse lnear demand functon s P = 10.5Q. 16. College b. MR = Computers 10 Q and s MC a monopolstcally = 14 + Q. Settng compettve MR = MC frm yelds and 10 faces Q a = downward 14 + Q. slopng Solvng demand for Q for yelds ts product. Q = 8 unts. Thus, The you optmal should prce equate s P MR = 10 = MC.5(8) to = maxmze $6. profts. c. Revenues Here, are MR R = 1000 ($6)(8) Q = $48. and Costs MC = are Q. C Settng = 104 1000 14(8) + Q (8) = = Q $56. mples Thus that the your frm optmal earns output a loss of s $8. 50 However, unts per the week. frm Your should optmal contnue prce operatng s P = 1000 snce t 50 s = Manageral $750. Economcs and Busness Strategy, 7e Page 1 coverng Your weekly varable revenues costs. are R = ($750)(50) = $187,500 and your weekly costs are d. In C = the 000 long + run (50) ext = wll $64,500. occur and Your the weekly demand profts for ths are frm s thus product $13,000. wll You ncrease should Chapter expect untl other t 9: earns frms Answers zero to economc enter the to market; profts. Questons Otherwse, your profts the wll frm and declne should Problems over ext tme the busness and you wll n lose the market long run. share to other frms. 17. 8. "# Your average varable cost of producng the 10,000 unts s $600 (deprecaton s a fxed A EQA, 0.1 a. $# The %&# cost). Snce the prce you have been offered ($650) exceeds your average varable optmal cost ($600), advertsng you should to sales accept rato the s gven offer; by dong 0.05. R so " Eadds $50 QP, per unt (for a '# %"# total of $500,000) to your frm s bottom lne. (# A EQA, A 0.1 b. A $.05% $ $50, 000 % $, 500. R)# *&+# " EQP, $50, 000 ))# +,-)./# Chapter9 )))# *&+.0*1+# &# a# c" " "++ #"& " $# Q" $ # Q& $ # Q& $ && # +#1Q& $- & b & & & & " a # c& " "++ # &+ " Q & $ # Q" $ # Q" $ &+ # +# 1Q" # & b & &&" & Page Mchael R. Baye '# 3 " 4"563 & 4"&# Page 4 (# 74"++8&9&:;4*<<# Mchael R. Baye # " 4*1"&6 & 4*&::# =# $# "&1,-)./# '# "++,-)./>$(?# (# @?>A>$>BCB0,(>/"1+,-)./$-.?>D0AA0E>BCB0,(>/F1,-)./# # "1+,-)./# ># )# F1,-)./# ))# G'0,.""&#1,-)./#

'# "++,-)./>$(?# (# @?>A>$>BCB0,(>/"1+,-)./$-.?>D0AA0E>BCB0,(>/F1,-)./# # "1+,-)./# ># )# F1,-)./# ))# G'0,.""&#1,-)./# <# a# cf " &+H +++ # <H +++ " $# QF $ # QL $ # QL $ "H 5++ # +#1QL # & b & & 1 & '# 3 I 4":++63 J 4F++# (# 74&+H+++819&1++;4*FH1++# # I 4*:#"K)AA)0-6 J 4*&#<1K)AA)0-# 1# $# L>.74MN.0O>.1++8&34*"++#L0AP)-OQ)>A/34&++,-)./# '# 74MN4*"++# (# R$(?D)BK>$B-/S>B0>(0-0K)(CB0D)./# " Part. Problem1. Manageral Economcs and Busness Strategy, 7e Page 1 Seepage41 43ofthetextbook.

1 Part II 1.1 Problem Margnal revenues MR = 100 Q Margnal cost San Jose MC SJ =4q sj Margnal cost Santa Cruz MC SC =6q sc We know that a suffcent condton to produce n both plants s MR = MC SJ = MC SC workng out the algebra, we get q sj =3/q sc and 100 q sj q sc = 6q sc 100 3q sc q sc = 6q sc 100/11 = q sc Therefore, q sj = 150/11 For completeness we need to check f jont profts s hgher than profts producng usng one plant. π BOT H = 100 500/11 100 (150/11) 3(100/11) Notce that q 1 SJ = 100/6 and q1 SC = 100/8 π SJ = 100 00/6 75 (100/6) π SC = 100 00/8 5 3 (100/8) comparng profts, we can check that t s optmal to produce ONLY n Santa Cruz 1. Problem 3 - from the game n class let s work out a general case and then use the varables gven n the problem set, assume a lnear nverse demand P = A b( N =1 q )=A bq and a lner cost functon C = cq where q represents the quantty produced by frm,n s the total number of frms n the market and Q the total quantty produced n the market. the profts for the frm j s gven by π j = Pq j cq j the FOC s N A b( q ) bq j c =0 =1 then addng the FOC for each frm n the market N A N b Q bq Nc =0 1

then solvng for Q Q = N(A c) b(n + 1) Now, let s check the parameters gven n the problem set. We know that A = 100, N =4, c =4, b =1 therefore, the total quantty n the market s Q = 4 96 5 then each frm produces q = 96/5 19 Note: Notce that game n class, groups are choosng quanttes smultaneously. Therefore, the appropate model to study the game played s the COURNOT model. Cournot was one of the poneers n mcro-theory.