APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)



Similar documents
Surface Transportation Program (STP)

Alternatives to the Circ Project Prioritization Methodology Prepared for Circ Task Force July 28, 2011

ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR DESIGNING YOUR SAFE ROUTES

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

BIKEWAY TYPOLOGIES COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHOP JULY John Cock, Principal/Planner Alta Planning + Design

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs


Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

Roadway Cost Per Centerline Mile Revised June 2014

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC

How To Improve Safety

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

Revised January Bicycle Policy & Design Guidelines Maryland State Highway Administration

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

RESOLUTION NO

Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design Safe, Smart and Defendable

Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

RESOLUTIONS FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)

SECTION 6: TRANSPORTATION

The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Transportation Policy and Design Strategies. Freight Intensive. Level of Freight Presence

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES

RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS

Corridor Goals and Objectives

STREETS -- BICYCLES -- PATHS

8+ %!0"% 8+1!%"'$%,$"$

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

NASHVILLE BICYCLE LAW 3/18/09

Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan

SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

CHAPTERTWO. Alternatives 2.1 ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

CHAPTER 13. Transportation Systems Management & Operations

SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.

7.0 Transportation Management

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

How To Design A Bicycle Path In California

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Preliminary Investigation Caltrans Division of Research and Innovation

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

ANNOTATED CODE OF MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION Bicycle Related Definitions and Laws

CHAPTER 13. Transportation Systems Management & Operations

Developing Street Standards That Allow Flexibility

Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016

Measuring the Street:

Texas Case Studies in Access Management. Ed Hard, TTI

Implementation Strategy

Accident Analysis of Sheridan Road between Isabella Street and South Boulevard

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

SEMINOLE PRATT WHITNEY ROAD & NORTHLAKE BLVD. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Review Public Input Report Jenn Toothaker. Approval of Meeting Summaries: May 21, May 23, May 30, & June 20, 2013 Meetings

For more information, visit: rethinkingstreets.com

CITY OF BRAMPTON STREET CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN

Pavement Management Program

Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City

Maryland Invests $845 Million in New Highway and Bridge Projects

- FREE! - The Official San Francisco BIKE GUIDE. 1st Edition

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

Section 2 Alternatives

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

DRAFT Freight Performance Measures

Chapter 5. Transportation. Decatur County Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Goals and Objectives. Goal. Objectives. Goal.

Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives

Walking Route the assigned or authorized route a pupil walks to arrive at school or at the designated bus stop.

Road Signs Recognition Quiz

Comprehensive Plan Policies that support Infill and Mixed Use

Needs Analysis. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. Bicycle Commuter Needs. LONG BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Needs Analysis

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CONCEPTS

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Final Report Best Practices in Arterial Speed Management

H-GAC 2015 Call for Projects - Selected Projects

Safety Evidence for Bicycling

Transcription:

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) To be considered for STP funding, a proposed project must be included in the PLANNING area covered by the Lafayette Metropolitan Planning Organization. One application must be completed for each project being proposed for STP funding. All areas of the application must be completed. If you have any questions, please contact Lafayette MPO at 337-291-8016, 337-291- 8456 or 337-291-8120. Jurisdiction: Date: Prepared By: Contact Person: Email: :Phone: Fax: Project Name: Project Location: Project Description: (Provide as much detail as possible. Include additional data or maps as attachments.) Need for and benefit to be derived from project. Please draw the typical section of proposed project. (Indicate number of lanes, width of lanes, bike lanes, shoulders, buffers, sidewalks, etc.) Is this project included in Lafayette MPO 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan? N/A REQUESTING AMENDMENT

Project Readiness: Is there community support for the project? (ordinance/resolution) Is preliminary engineering completed? Has funding been identified to cover the required match? Project Activation Request: FY Requested Funding Stage: Year Begin: Federal Share: Local Share: Total: Design/PE FY $ $ $ Environmental FY $ $ $ ROW FY $ $ $ Construction FY $ $ $ Total Project Cost: $ Identify and describe any additional sources of funding (including grants, local matches, taxing districts, private partnerships, etc.) DOTD Functional classification of roadway(s): Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Length of project (miles): Does this project require additional right of way? YES NO Number of parcels to be acquired Congestion The project reduces congestion as defined by Level of Service The project increase capacity but not impact congestion. The project neither increases capacity nor reduces congestion. : Congestion Management Process The project is on a current CMP corridor with Level-of-service E or F. The project is on a current CMP corridor with Level-of-service D.

Capacity The project improves roadway/intersection capacity. The project improves network capacity. Safety The project addresses a previously identified safety concern. The project improves safety by including proven safety measures. Access Management The project reduces current conflict points. The project reduces future conflict points. The project does not address Access Management Network Connectivity The project connects existing roadway, pedestrian bike or transit route(s). Conformance with MPO/Local Entity Plans The project conforms with the Consolidated Thoroughfare Plan (CTP). The project conforms with the Financially Constrained Thoroughfare Plan. The project conforms with the Transit Plan. The project conforms with the Roundabout Plan. The project is identified by a Local Master Plan. The project does not conform with any MPO Plans. Complete Streets Policy The project meets the requirements of the DOTD Complete Streets Policy.

Pedestrian and Bike Mobility How do you plan to accommodate bicyclists? Shared use Paved shoulder Bicycle lane Separated path The project conforms with the MPO Bikeway Plan. _ How do you plan to accommodate pedestrians? The project conforms with the MPO Pedestrian Plan. The project incorporates sidewalks, bikeways or pedestrian facilities. The project incorporates measures used to provide for the safety and accessibility of pedestrians and bicyclists. Multimodal The project is an intermodal connector. The project is along an LTS fixed transit route. The project incorporates transit system improvement measures. Environmental Justice The project has a positive impact on the target area. The project has a negative impact on the target area. Freight Network The project improves freight movements. The project is located on LA DOTD s freight network. Is this project located on a roadway with fixed route transit service? If yes, explain how this project will include coordination with the transit service provider. Please attach TIP PROJECT ORDINANCE and an estimate of probable cost breakdown

Please circle all that apply to your project Project Types (*) May quality for > 80% funding Minor Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Signal-Retiming Add signal* Remove signal Geometry Improvement Restrict turns Add turn lanes* Restrict trucks Roundabout* Improve signage* Intersection beacon Re-striping* On-way operations Transit System Improvements Bike/Pedestrian Improvements Express bus service Bike lanes Expanded service Shared use paths* Light Rail New Paved Shoulders* Technology improvements Wider paved shoulders* Bike and Bus program New sidewalks Improved transit stops Improved sidewalks Bus traffic signal priority* Marked/raised crosswalks Transit marketing Bike/pedestrian signals Transit pull-outs Improved signage Shelters Curb extensions Bike parking Pedestrian refuge area* Travel Demand Management Safety Improvements Bus lanes Guard rails* Park and ride lots Roadway lighting* Vanpool program* Rumble strips* Carpool program* Safety edge* TDM marketing & signage Roadway safety audits* Minor Bridge Reconstruction Railroad crossing closure* Bridge maintenance Raised centerline markers* Bridge replacement Re-striping* Overlays Traffic Calming Measures New Construction Chokers* New road Bulbouts* New interchange Speed tables* Overpass Speed humps* Underpass Chicanes* Neckdowns* Corridor Reconstruction- Access Management Frontage roads Driveway control reduction Curb and gutter Add/improve medians Reconstruct roadway Add or widen shoulders* Lane widening Lane narrowing* Corridor Reconstruction Operations and Channelization Synchronize signals Pavement signs* Add turn lanes Minor reconstruction Accel, Decel lanes Extended turn lanes Movable barrier* Reconfigured or improved pavement marking* Traffic Management Traffic surveillance Computerized signal systems Motorist information systems Incident management Corridor Reconstruction Center Lane Center turn lane Add Base Capacity Add lanes Extend roadway Interchange reconstruction Submit to: Mike Hollier Lafayette MPO 101 Jefferson St., Suite 201 Lafayette, LA 70501-7007