Capacity Deficiency Project Application Jackson MPO Surface Transportation Program



Similar documents
Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

GENERAL. This manual addresses five local programs that are funded under the current Highway Act:

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET. Department of Rural and Municipal Aid. Office of Local Programs

APPLICATION LAFAYETTE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) FUNDS TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

LOUISIANA LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM. Local Road Safety Improvement Projects

Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016

Surface Transportation Program (STP)

3.1 Historical Considerations

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

Chapter 5 Financial Plan

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Prioritization & Selection Process. For the Tulsa Urbanized Area. Revised 2015

Improving Access in Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus Executive Summary

Parklet FAQs. Each parklet has a sign on it clearly indicating that it is a public space.

Tier 1 Strategies. WV Route 14 Corridor Management Plan

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Bicycle and Pedestrian Subcommittee (BPS) Recommendation FY 2015 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Allocation

Implementation Strategy

RESOLUTIONS FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)


FY2016 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES

Roadway Cost Per Centerline Mile Revised June 2014

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation

TRANSPORTATION SERVICE STANDARDS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

Competitive Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)

Welcome! Purpose of Tonight s Meeting. Informational Open House to discuss two City projects: Goal is to LISTEN TO YOU

DE 8 Concept Plan and Operations Study. Dover Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee October 23, 2007

Narrative Response/Attachment 1 (WisDOT TAP- Second Round Application ID-SWBP22)

Missouri Department of Transportation

SAFETEA-LU TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS BILL SUMMARY

INDOT Long Range Plan

When the County Acquires Your Property

Surface Transportation Program

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan

Healthy, Equitable Transportation Performance Measures and Creative Place-making

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES

BEST PRACTICES. Smart Transportation is a key concept for the Paoli Roadway Improvement Project.

PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Application Procedure for MORPC-Attributable Funding Programs: April 2014

Update on Previous Related Transportation Enhancement Grants

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Regional Surface Transportation Program

CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)

Multi-Modal Corridor Degree of Complexity: High Cost/Benefit: High

Transportation Improvement Program FY

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TAP/STP Set aside Projects

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

Bicycle Safety Program Plan

Presentation to Community Task Force July 9, 2007

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

Moving a House in Pasadena

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Contra Costa Community College District Business Procedure PARKING AND TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

Transportation Alternatives Program Guide

Corridor Goals and Objectives

Pedestrian & Bicycle Roadway Design Safe, Smart and Defendable

REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND EVALUATION MEASURES

MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENTS Water, Sewer, Stormwater and Streetscape Improvements

SR-18 Corridor Improvements in Wood County

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan

Management System Support Tool

Transportation Management Plan Template

Assessing Paved Trails for Compliance with Standards and Best Practices

AREA: 0.16 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF

Definitions. For the purposes of this rule chapter the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly shows otherwise:

Implementing the Transportation Alternatives Program for the National Capital Region

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

Chapter 2. Project Development. 2 Project Development

QUALITY ASSURANCE. and QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS GUIDE. for PROJECT MANAGERS

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

Downtown Community Planning Council Meeting offebruary 18, 2015

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. August 10, 2015 WEST BOYLSTON TOWN HALL, BOARD MEETING ROOM. 140 Worcester Street WEST BOYLSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC

REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION

AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

CHAPTER 6 Project Cost, Scope, and Schedule Changes Table of Contents

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

CHAPTER 5-CMPO TRANSPORTATION VISION PLANS (2035 & BEYOND)

I-25 / Rio Bravo Interchange

DVRPC s Transportation Alternatives Program Guidance and Procedures

Transportation Management Toolbox Strategies

**The Winter 2010 edition of The Road Ahead newsletter is available online.

SUMMARY OF CATEGORIES 2007 STATEWIDE PRESERVATION PROGRAM (SPP) _MAINTAIN IT_

Maryland Invests $845 Million in New Highway and Bridge Projects

Action on Amendment Five to the FFYs TIP Page 1 of 8 Boston Region MPO Staff - 9/3/2015

Bikeway Inventory System. October 2015

2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST

Technical Report 4: Congestion Management Process Final Plan for Adoption October 2015

2014 Surface Transportation Program Island Sub-region RTPO Technical Advisory Committee Recommendations. Amount Requested

Transcription:

Capacity Deficiency Project Application Jackson MPO Surface Transportation Program The following information must be completed for all Capacity Deficiency proposed Jackson MPO STP projects. MPO staff will use the information contained in the project application to assign points to proposed projects based on the Project Submittal Guidelines. The establishment of project eligibility and each project score will then be used by the Intermodal Technical Committee and Metropolitan Planning Policy Committee to program projects to be funded with Jackson MPO STP funds. A separate application must be submitted for each type of project. For example, do not combine a street widening project with a traffic signal improvement project. Applicant Information 1. Project Sponsor 2. Sponsor Contact 3. Telephone 4. Email 5. Mailing Address 6. Additional Sponsors 7. Co-Sponsor Contact Name(s) Project Description 8. Project Title 9. Project Type 10. County 11. Municipality

12. Small Municipality 13. Small Municipality population according to the latest U.S. Census 14. Project Location 15. Functional Class 16. Detailed Project Description

Project Costs 17. Total Project Costs Description Federal Funds Local Funds Environmental $ $ Design $ $ Right-of-Way Acquisition $ $ Eligible for STP funding Construction Engineering $ $ Construction $ $ Other, please specify $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL Estimated Cost $ $

STP Funds Requested Amount % 18. Federal STP Funds Requested $ Can t be more than 80% 19. Minimum Local Match Provided $ Can t be less than 20% 20. Local Overmatch Provided $ 21. TOTAL for STP Portion of Project $ 100% 22. Source of Local Funds 23. Date Available Project Schedule 24. Milestone Dates Completion of Preliminary Design Completion of Environmental Clearances Completion of Final Design Initiation of Right-of-Way Plan Review Completion of Right-of-Way Plan Review Initiation of Utilities Relocation Completion of Utilities Relocation Completion of Plans, Specifications and Estimates and/or Authorization for Advertisement Anticipated Construction Advertisement Date or Purchase Date

Congestion Management System (CMS) Index Rating 25. CMS Index Rating Road Segment CMS Index Rating Average CMS Index Rating To be completed by MPO Staff Project Readiness 26. Project Design Yes or No 26 a. Has preliminary design work been created for the proposed project?

26 b. If Yes, please provide a brief description of the work performed to-date.

27. Environmental Yes or No 27 a. Does the proposed project meet a categorical exclusion? 27 b. If No, has the environmental process begun? 27 c. If the environmental process has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to-date. Yes or No 27d. Has the project received Federal approval for environmental?

28. Right-of-Way Acquisition Yes or No 28 a. Does the proposed project require right-of-way acquisition? 28 b. If Yes, has right-of-way acquisition begun? 28 c. What percentage of right-of-way acquisition has been completed? 28 d. If right-of-way acquisition has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to date and whether or not it has been approved by MDOT.

29. Utility Relocation Yes or No 29 a. Does the proposed project require utility relocation? 29 b. If Yes, has utility relocation begun? 29 c. What percentage of utility relocation has been completed? 29 d. If utility relocation has begun, please provide a brief explanation of the steps completed to date and whether or not It has been approved by MDOT.

30. Describe any potential delays that have been identified that would interfere with the schedule for this project or the readiness of the project to proceed to construction.

Livability If points are awarded based on proposed livability elements, those element should not be removed during the construction phase for reasons such as budget overages without prior approval from the MPO. 31. Does the proposed project include enhancements to landscaping and/or streetscape? 32. If yes, provide a brief explanation of the enhancements to landscaping and/or the streetscape included in the project. Yes or No

33. Please indicate whether or not the proposed project includes the following elements: Yes or No The proposed project includes a Signed Bike Route The proposed project includes Sidewalks The proposed project includes Paved Shoulders The proposed project includes Striped Lanes for bicycle and/or pedestrian travel The proposed project includes Separate Facilities/Shared Use Facilities for bicycle and/or pedestrian travel The proposed project is located adjacent to existing bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities, but the proposed project does not include enhancements to the existing facilities The livability enhancements included as part of the proposed project will connect to an existing bicycle and/or pedestrian facility