Coverage Characteristics of Earth Satellites



Similar documents
Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

SATELLITE ORBIT DETERMINATION AND ANALYSIS (S.O.D.A) A VISUAL TOOL OF SATELLITE ORBIT FOR SPACE ENGINEERING EDUCATION & RESEARCH

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

Chapter 2. Mission Analysis. 2.1 Mission Geometry

Astromechanics Two-Body Problem (Cont)

Flight and Orbital Mechanics

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

4 The Rhumb Line and the Great Circle in Navigation

Coordinate Systems. Orbits and Rotation

Understanding Orbital Mechanics Through a Step-by-Step Examination of the Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS)

The Four Seasons. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. A Warm Up Exercise. The Moon s Phases

Solar System. 1. The diagram below represents a simple geocentric model. Which object is represented by the letter X?

CBERS Program Update Jacie Frederico dos Santos Liporace AMS Kepler

Calculation of Azimuth, Elevation and Polarization for non-horizontal aligned Antennas

NASA-RP N An introduction to orbit dynamics and its application to satellite-based earth monitoring systems

Newton s Law of Gravity

Satellite Posi+oning. Lecture 5: Satellite Orbits. Jan Johansson Chalmers University of Technology, 2013

1. The orbit of each planet is an ellipse with the Sun at one focus. 2. The line joining the planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.

Earth In Space Chapter 3

Orbital Mechanics. Angular Momentum

Where On Earth Will Three Different Satellites Provide Simultaneous Coverage?

Satellite Mission Analysis

Section 2. Satellite Orbits

Earth Coverage by Satellites in Circular Orbit

Orbital Mechanics. Orbital Mechanics. Principles of Space Systems Design David L. Akin - All rights reserved

SUN-SYNCHRONOUS ORBIT SLOT ARCHITECTURE ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT. A Thesis. Presented to. the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University

C B A T 3 T 2 T What is the magnitude of the force T 1? A) 37.5 N B) 75.0 N C) 113 N D) 157 N E) 192 N

Development of a Sun Synchronous. Conjunctions

Mobile Communications: Satellite Systems

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB COMPUTATIONAL OPTICS RAYLEIGH-SOMMERFELD DIFFRACTION INTEGRAL OF THE FIRST KIND

Lecture L17 - Orbit Transfers and Interplanetary Trajectories

The Sun. Solar radiation (Sun Earth-Relationships) The Sun. The Sun. Our Sun

Mobile Communications Chapter 5: Satellite Systems

Development of an automated satellite network management system

Artificial Satellites Earth & Sky

Note S1: Eclipses & Predictions

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARCHITECTURE OF SUN-SYNCHRONOUS ORBITAL SLOTS TO MINIMIZE CONJUNCTIONS. Brian Weeden Secure World Foundation

Tropical Horticulture: Lecture 2

CALCULATION OF CLOUD MOTION WIND WITH GMS-5 IMAGES IN CHINA. Satellite Meteorological Center Beijing , China ABSTRACT

Orbital Dynamics: Formulary

Analysis on the Long-term Orbital Evolution and Maintenance of KOMPSAT-2

GPS ALIGNMENT SURVEYS AND MERIDIAN CONVERGENCE

USE OF SCILAB FOR SPACE MISSION ANALYSIS AND FLIGHT DYNAMICS ACTIVITIES

The Earth Really is Flat! The Globe and Coordinate Systems. Long History of Mapping. The Earth is Flat. Long History of Mapping

2. Orbits. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

Trigonometry LESSON ONE - Degrees and Radians Lesson Notes

Renewable Energy. Solar Power. Courseware Sample F0

PROTECTION OF THE BROADCASTING SERVICE FROM BROADCASTING SATELLITE SERVICE TRANSMISSIONS IN THE BAND MHz

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

Chapter 3 Earth - Sun Relations

For further information, and additional background on the American Meteorological Society s Education Program, please contact:

EN4 Dynamics and Vibrations. Design Project. Orbital Design for a Lunar Impact Mission. Synopsis

CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY CONTROL OF COLOCATED GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITES

VIIRS-CrIS mapping. NWP SAF AAPP VIIRS-CrIS Mapping

EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASTRONOMY 100 Winter Quarter 2007 Sample Test # 1

Full credit for this chapter to Prof. Leonard Bachman of the University of Houston

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 1 Review

The ecliptic - Earth s orbital plane

Earth Coordinates & Grid Coordinate Systems

Sun Earth Relationships

WHAT YOU NEED TO USE THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEMS

PHY121 #8 Midterm I

Math 215 Project (25 pts) : Using Linear Algebra to solve GPS problem

RS platforms. Fabio Dell Acqua - Gruppo di Telerilevamento

Can Hubble be Moved to the International Space Station? 1

6. The greatest atmospheric pressure occurs in the 1) troposphere 3) mesosphere 2) stratosphere 4) thermosphere

Quasi-Synchronous Orbits

Which month has larger and smaller day time?

Practice Final Math 122 Spring 12 Instructor: Jeff Lang

Dynamics of Iain M. Banks Orbitals. Richard Kennaway. 12 October 2005

The Map Grid of Australia 1994 A Simplified Computational Manual

Performances Optimization of Remote Sensing Satellite Constellations: a Heuristic Method

Sunlight and its Properties. EE 495/695 Y. Baghzouz

Vocabulary - Understanding Revolution in. our Solar System

An Optimal Design of Constellation of Multiple Regional Coverage

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Examination Space Missions and Applications I (AE2103) Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology SAMPLE EXAM

Introduction to satellite constellations orbital types, uses and related facts

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 13.

Orbital Dynamics with Maple (sll --- v1.0, February 2012)

Mobile Computing. Chapter 5: Satellite Systems

Celestial Sphere. Celestial Coordinates. Lecture 3: Motions of the Sun and Moon. ecliptic (path of Sun) ecliptic (path of Sun)

Orientation to the Sky: Apparent Motions

Satellite Orbits, Coverage, and Antenna Alignment

Mission Design for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

The Gravitational Field

The Celestial Sphere. Questions for Today. The Celestial Sphere 1/18/10

5. Satellite Systems. History of Satellite Communications

The Visualization Simulation of Remote-Sensing Satellite System

Searching for space debris elements with the Pi of the Sky system

The following words and their definitions should be addressed before completion of the reading:

EARTH'S MOTIONS. 2. The Coriolis effect is a result of Earth's A tilted axis B orbital shape C revolution D rotation

Transcription:

Coverage Characteristics of Earth Satellites This document describes two MATLAB scripts that can be used to determine coverage characteristics of single satellites, and Walker and user-defined satellite constellations. A third script is also included that determines the view periods of satellites in circular orbits. coverage1.m geometry of satellite coverage This MATLAB application calculates a variety of coverage information for satellites in circular and elliptic Earth orbits. The user can elect to compute coverage characteristics from one of the following satellite orbital positions: perigee apogee extreme northern latitude extreme southern latitude user-defined true anomaly user-defined satellite latitude The user can also select one of the following coverage constraints and perform calculations for one or two values: nadir angle Earth central angle elevation angle slant range The following diagram illustrates the coverage geometry of a satellite in orbit above a spherical planet with a nadir-pointing conical sensor or field-of-view: satellite s r sat r e page 1

where s nadir angle central angle elevation angle slant range r geocentric radius of satellite r h h sat e sat sat r e altitude of satellite radius of the Earth The fundamental relationship between these angles and distances is given by 90 scos r sat sin ssin r sin Furthermore, the nadir angle from the satellite s location to the Earth horizon is e 1 r e h sin rsat The equations that define these angles as a function of slant range s are as follows: 2 2 1 rsat re s cos 2srsat 2rsat r r s 2 2 2 1 sat e cos 2rsatre sin 2 2 1 rsat re s 2sre 2re The relationships between the nadir angle, central angle and the slant range as functions of the elevation angle are defined by the following expressions: 1 r e sin cos rsat page 2

r rsat 1 e cos cos s r r cos r sin 2 2 2 sat e e The central angle, elevation angle and slant range as functions of the nadir angle can be determined from 1 r sat sin sin re r 1 sat cos sin re s r cos r r sin 2 2 2 sat e sat The relationship between the nadir angle, elevation angle and slant range and the central angle is given by the following expressions: 1 re sin tan rsat rsat cos 1 rsat cos r e tan rsat sin s r r 2r r cos 2 2 sat e sat e The width of the swath is given by w 2 e r The percentage of the Earth s surface viewed by this configuration is 501 cos and the coverage surface area is given by A r e 2 2 1 cos The following is a typical user interaction with this program. program coverage1 coverage characteristics of Earth satellites please input the semimajor axis (kilometers) (semimajor axis > 0)? 8000 page 3

please input the orbital eccentricity (non-dimensional) (0 <= eccentricity < 1)? 0 please input the orbital inclination (degrees) (0 <= inclination <= 180)? 28.5 please select the satellite's position <1> perigee <2> apogee <3> extreme northern latitude <4> extreme southern latitude <5> user-defined true anomaly <6> user-defined satellite latitude selection (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6)? 3 please select the coverage constraint <1> nadir angle <2> earth central angle <3> elevation angle <4> slant range selection (1, 2, 3 or 4)? 3 please input the number of coverage constraints (1 or 2)? 1 coverage constraint number 1 please input the elevation angle (degrees)? 5 The following is the program output for this example. satellite altitude true anomaly slant range 1626.7427 kilometers 9000 degrees 4305.0081 kilometers page 4

nadir angle earth central angle elevation angle earth coverage area earth coverage area arc distance view latitude 1 view latitude 2 52.5829 degrees 32.4171 degrees 5.0000 degrees 39831241.9936 square kilometers 7.7916 percent 3608.6532 kilometers -3.9171 degrees 60.9171 degrees coverage2.m coverage characteristics of satellite constellations This MATLAB application can be used to assess the partial coverage performance of Walker and user-defined satellite constellations. The user can specify the total simulation time and a single geographic target, and the software will determine such coverage statistics as minimum, average, and maximum coverage time, etc. The user can also specify a minimum elevation angle constraint or mask at the target. During the simulation satellite orbits are propagated using Kozai s method and the Earth is modeled as an oblate spheroid. The following is a typical data file (constel1.dat) that simulates a user-defined constellation and ground site. This constellation consists of six satellites. number of satellites 6 initial orbital elements - satellite #1 6865.85585 39.0 348.17 initial orbital elements - satellite #2 6865.85585 39.0 22.83 201.21 initial orbital elements - satellite #3 6865.85585 39.0 57.5 42.42 initial orbital elements - satellite #4 page 5

6865.85585 39.0 168.57 18 initial orbital elements - satellite #5 6865.85585 39.0 203.23 21.21 initial orbital elements - satellite #6 6865.85585 39.0 237.9 222.42 ground site latitude (degrees) 3 ground site longitude (degrees) ground site altitude (meters) minimum elevation angle constraint (degrees) 5.0 simulation duration (days) 1.0 The following is a typical Walker constellation data file (walker1.dat). Notice the use of the T/P/F (T is the total number of satellites, P is the total number of orbit planes, F is the phasing unit) method to define the constellation. Walker T/P/F configuration 7,7,4 constellation semimajor axis (kilometers) 6865.222 constellation inclination (degrees) 38.0 ground site latitude (degrees) 3 ground site longitude (degrees) 24 page 6

ground site altitude (meters) 10 minimum elevation angle constraint (degrees) 5.0 simulation duration (days) 1.0 The following is a typical user interaction and program output created with this application. It illustrates the performance of a Walker 7/7/4 constellation relative to a ground site at 30 north latitude and 240 east longitude. For Walker constellations the software determines the east longitude of the ascending node and mean anomaly of each satellite. program coverage2 analysis of partial coverage constellations <1> evaluate Walker constellation <2> evaluate user-defined constellation selection (1 or 2)? 1 please input the name of the Walker data file (be sure to include the filename extension)? walker1.dat constellation mean orbital elements semimajor axis inclination 6865.2220 kilometers 38.0000 degrees satellite east longitude of mean anomaly number ascending node (deg) (degrees) 1 000 000 2 51.4286 205.7143 3 102.8571 51.4286 4 154.2857 257.1429 5 205.7143 102.8571 6 257.1429 308.5714 7 308.5714 154.2857 coverage statistics target latitude target east longitude target altitude minimum elevation angle 3000 degrees 24000 degrees 10000 meters 5.0000 degrees page 7

total number of accesses 45 minimum coverage time average coverage time maximum coverage time total coverage time 3.297437 minutes 8.487978 minutes 9.586444 minutes 381.959005 minutes total number of gaps 46 minimum gap time average gap time maximum gap time total gap time total simulation time 1.563970 minutes 23.000891 minutes 29.841843 minutes 1058.040995 minutes 1.000000 days Long-Term Prediction of View Periods This section describes an algorithm and MATLAB script called vperiod that can be used to determine the long-term view periods between a satellite in a circular Earth orbit and a ground site on a spherical Earth. The mathematics of this algorithm are described in The Long-Term Forecast of Station View Periods, by Martin W. Lo, JPL TDA Progress Report 42-118, August 15, 1994. This report also contains an error analysis comparing this closed-form solution and the classical method of perturbed orbit propagation. This technique is valid for orbits and ground sites that satisfy the following conditions: Non-equatorial, circular Earth orbits Orbits perturbed by the secular effect of J 2 only Non-repeating ground track Ground stations not at the north or south pole The view period ratio is defined by the following expression: PT Lim T T where T is the total elapsed or simulation time and P(T) is the total station view period of a satellite during the simulation time T. The view period function is given by the following expression: page 8

f cos cos 1 cos sinsin s sin cos cos 2 2 2 s i sin where s is the latitude of the ground site and is the Earth central angle. The Earth central angle is a function of the satellite s altitude h sat and the minimum elevation angle e min as follows: cos 1 r e cosemin rsat where r e is the radius of the Earth and rsat re hsat. e The maximum ground site latitude which can be viewed by this satellite is equal to the sum of the orbital inclination i and the Earth central angle. The view period ratio for any ground site is calculated using the following definite integral: 2 f d 1 where the finite limits of integration are given by 1 2 max, L min, L These limits depend upon the orbital inclination i, the ground site latitude of interest s, the Earth central angle and the value of L i which is given by s s i i min L i i if i 90 degrees 180 i if i 90 degrees From the view period ratio, we can determine the total view period during any time interval of interest using T total view period during elapsed time T Furthermore, 24 hours average daily total view period 7 days average weekly total view period Another application is the maximum average contact time possible with the K ground stations and a single satellite during a 24 hour interval given by: page 9

C 12 K 24 hours The extension of this technique to constellations of satellites is straight-forward. Numerical Solution The view period integral is solved numerically using a Gauss-Kronrod quadrature algorithm due to T. Patterson with enhancements by F. Krogh and W. Snyder. The syntax of this MATLAB function is as follows: function [result, k, icheck] = kquad(usrfunc, a, b, tol) % one-dimensional quadrature % method due to T. Patterson with modifications % by F. Krogh and W. Snyder (ACM Algorithm 699) % input % usrfunc = name of user-defined function % a = lower integration limit % b = upper integration limit % tol = convergence tolerance % output % result = array of solution(s) % k = index of result array which best satisfies tol % icheck = 0 ==> convergence % = 1 ==> non-convergence The following is a typical user interaction with this script. program vperiod < long-term prediction of view periods > please input the altitude (kilometers)? 200 please input the orbital inclination (degrees) (0 <= inclination <= 180)? 28.5 please input the minimum elevation angle (degrees) (abs(elevation) >= 0 degrees)? 0 please select the type of calculation page 10

? 2 <1> single ground site <2> range of ground sites The script will ask the user if he or she would like to create a plot of the view period ratio as a function of the ground site latitude with the following request: would you like to create and display graphics (y = yes, n = no)? y The user can also create a data file of these conditions by responding with y for yes to the following prompt: would you like to create a data file (y = yes, n = no)? y Finally, the user can specify the number of data points in both the graphics and data file via the following response: please input the number of data points to use? 100 The following is the companion graphics display for this example. 35 Long Term Prediction of Station View Periods 3 25 View Period Ratio 2 15 1 05 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Ground Site Latitude (degrees) page 11

This plot is symmetric about the equator. The following are the first few lines of the output data file. Column 1 is the ground site latitude in degrees, and column 2 is the view period ratio which is non-dimensional. 000 2102956 0.4266 2103287 0.8533 2104284 1.2799 2105949 1.7066 2108287 2.1332 2111308 2.5599 2115022 2.9865 2119442 3.4132 2124584 3.8398 2130467 4.2665 2137115 4.6931 2144552 5.1198 2152810 5.5464 2161923 5.9731 2171931 page 12