Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study Report-Web Version. PJM Generation Interconnection Request Queue Position Z1-055



Similar documents
Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report. For. PJM Generation Interconnection Request Queue Position X1-114.

Midwest Reliability Organization Procedure For NERC PRC-012

Generation and Transmission Interconnection Process

Title 20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Subtitle 50 SERVICE SUPPLIED BY ELECTRIC COMPANIES. Chapter 02 Engineering

Summary of CIP Version 5 Standards

4.1.1 Generator Owner Transmission Owner that owns synchronous condenser(s)

Distribution Operations with High-penetration of Beyond the Meter Intermittent Renewables. Bob Yinger Southern California Edison April 15, 2014

FRCC Standards Handbook. FRCC Automatic Underfrequency Load Shedding Program. Revision Date: July 2003

Transmission Planning Study (Year 2022) for Cherokee 4 Replacement Alternatives. Final Report

Transmission Function Employees Job Titles and Descriptions 18 C.F.R 358.7(f)(1)

Alberta Reliability Standard Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments CIP-010-AB-1

Introduction to The Trans Bay Cable Project

Preliminary Feasibility Assessment For. The Rio Tinto Alcan to BCH Transfer Limit of 460 MW. With 50% Series Compensation on Both KMO KIT lines

Generator Interconnection and Deliverability Study Methodology Technical Paper

Electric Power Systems An Overview. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Q140 Cluster Addendum

PJM Interconnection LLC Regional Transmission Organization (RTO)

Treasure Valley Electric Plan - Community Advisory Committee

Energy Management System (EMS) Model Updates and Quality Assurance (QA)

FACT SHEET. BSES, Delhi - Distribution Network. Power Systems Consultancy from ABB

GIP Net Zero Interconnection Service.

Electrical System Studies

Grid of the Future. Integration of Renewables Energy Storage Smart Grid. Presentation by David Hawkins Lead Renewables Power Engineer Grid Operations

COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF 2006/07 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN. Top Energy Limited

When this standard has received ballot approval, the text boxes will be moved to the Guidelines and Technical Basis section of the Standard.

SOUTHERN MARYLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. HUGHESVILLE, MD

Alberta Reliability Standard Cyber Security Security Management Controls CIP-003-AB-5

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

IESO Supply Deliverability Guidelines

CLASS. Customer Load Active System Services

Green Power Connection Net Energy Metering Engineering Review Process in Delaware and Speeding Up the Application Fee Process

Duke Energy Progress Standards of Conduct Transmission Function Employee Job Titles and Job Descriptions 9/1/13

16 West Coast Regional Plan

Use Case Task 1-7: Network Equavalents between EMS & Planning

Joint Con Edison LIPA Offshore Wind Power Integration Project Feasibility Assessment

TDI's NYC Merchant CHPE Transmission Project with POI at Astoria (NYISO Queue #305) Deliverability Analysis

Transmission Planning Standards for the Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Transmission System

Power System review W I L L I A M V. T O R R E A P R I L 1 0,

Study to Determine the Limit of Integrating Intermittent Renewable (wind and solar) Resources onto Pakistan's National Grid

Load Dispatcher (Class Code 5223) Task List

Pennsylvania Summer Reliability

PacifiCorp Original Sheet No. 476 FERC Electric Tariff, Substitute 6 th Rev Volume No. 11 APPENDIX 2 TO SGIP

Integration Capacity Analysis Workshop 11/10/15 California IOU s Approach

Emera Maine Proposed Potential Transmission Projects. Line Identification Line 75 - KR Sub. Estimated Cost $201,464 $0 $3,200,000

Guidelines for Large Photovoltaic System Integration

LAB1 INTRODUCTION TO PSS/E EE 461 Power Systems Colorado State University

CLASS Voltage Regulation Scheme. 27 February 2014

E N G I N E E R I N G

Introduction to PowerWorld Simulator: Interface and Common Tools

NERC Cyber Security Standards

Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC Response to New York State Energy Highway RFI

CIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments

Appendix C-2. Entergy Services, Inc. June 8, 2016

System Protection Schemes in Eastern Denmark

ELECTRIC POWER OUTLOOK FOR PENNSYLVANIA

How To Operate The Williston Uvls

Guidelines for Monthly Statistics Data Collection

Updated SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY OF NEW ENGLAND AREA

STATEMENT OF CHARGING METHODOLOGY FOR USE OF ELECTRICITY NORTH WEST LIMITED S ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

CO-ORDINATION OF PARALLEL AC-DC SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE

Advanced Protection of Distribution Networks with Distributed Generators

Engineering innovation

Voltage Stability Improvement using Static Var Compensator in Power Systems

Power Plant Electrical Distribution Systems

California s Energy Future

Alberta Reliability Standard Cyber Security Physical Security of BES Cyber Systems CIP-006-AB-5

ATTACHMENT G. Network Operating Agreement

Treasure Valley Electrical Plan

Federal Wage System Job Grading Standards for Electric Power Controlling, Table of Contents

General Validation Test Program for Wind Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System

Distributed Generation: Feeder Hosting Capacity. Dean E. Philips, P.E. FirstEnergy Service Corp Manager, Distribution Planning & Protection

Scope of Restoration Plan

Reactive Power and Importance to Bulk Power System OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY ENGINEERING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DIVISION

Alberta Reliability Standard Cyber Security System Security Management CIP-007-AB-5

Kyrgyzstan: Power Generation & Transmission

GPS Interfacing of Banediya Feeder (M.P) Using MI Power Software

Network Consulting for Power Grid Optimization

NETWORK OUTPUT MEASURES METHODOLOGY Authors: National Grid, SP Transmission Limited, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Limited

Typical Data Requirements Data Required for Power System Evaluation

Distributed Generation and Power Quality Case Study

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR PROPOSED XXXXXXXX GENERATION ON THE SIERRA BLANCA-FARMER 69 KV LINE

Houston Region Import Capacity Project

Entity Name ( Acronym) NCRnnnnn Risk Assessment Questionnaire

HVDC Transmission Line Project for Moving ERCOT Wind Into SERC

Minimizing Impact of Electric Utility Outages with Backup Generation

Cyber Infrastructure for the Smart Grid

Contouring and Advanced Visualization

Transcription:

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study Report-Web Version For PJM Generation Interconnection Request Queue Position Z1-055 South Bend Generation Project March 2014 PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 1 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Feasibility Study Report South Bend Generation Project Introduction This Feasibility Study report provides the documentation of a system assessment performed by PJM Interconnection LLC (PJM) and FirstEnergy (FE) in response to a request made by Interconnection Customer for a 10 MW overall increase in energy and capacity output for the existing South Bend Generating Units. The existing four natural gas fired gen sets currently represent maximum capacity output of 623.4 MW. The location of the existing plant is in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania in South Bend Township at FirstEnergy s South Bend Substation. The proposed increase will occur through the implementation of the GE OpFlex Air Product, which includes minor software and mechanical changes. Connection Facilities In compliance with the Regional Transmission Expansion Planning (RTEP) protocol, Interconnection Customer has submitted a "Form of Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study Agreement" to PJM (see Attachment 4) that identifies its plan to implement the South Bend Generation Project upgrade to the existing South Bend Generation plant located just off of Route 56, Shelocta, Armstrong County PA, 15774 (see Attachment 1). The project upgrade will increase the total capability by 10 MW. The proposed effective date for this South Bend Generation Project is June 1, 2016. The primary point of connection (POI) for Z1-055 Generation Project is existing and will remain unchanged. Attachment 2 is a one-line diagram showing the existing point of interconnection of the South Bend substation. PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 2 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

PJM Interconnection Study Results The following are the results of the analysis performed by PJM engineers with respect to the transmission system impacts. Network Impacts The Queue Project #Z1-055 was studied as a 10.0 MW (Capacity 10.0 MW) injection at South Bend 500 kv substation in the APS area. Project #Z1-055 was evaluated for compliance with reliability criteria for summer peak conditions in 2017. Potential network impacts were as follows: Generator Deliverability (Single or N-1 contingencies for the Capacity portion only of the interconnection) None Light Load Analysis Light Load Studies to be conducted during later study phases (applicable to wind, coal, nuclear, and pumped storage projects). Multiple Facility Contingency (Double Circuit Tower Line, Failed Breaker and Bus Fault contingencies for the full energy output) None Short Circuit (Summary form of Cost allocation for breakers will be inserted here if any) Not required Contribution to Previously Identified Overloads (This project contributes to the following contingency overloads, i.e. "Network Impacts", identified for earlier generation or transmission interconnection projects in the PJM Queue) None Steady-State Voltage Requirements (Results of the steady-state voltage studies should be inserted here) PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 3 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

None Stability and Reactive Power Requirement (Results of the dynamic studies should be inserted here) Not required New System Reinforcements (Upgrades required to mitigate reliability criteria violations, i.e. Network Impacts, initially caused by the addition of this project generation) None Contribution to Previously Identified System Reinforcements (Overloads initially caused by prior Queue positions with additional contribution to overloading by this project. This project may have a % allocation cost responsibility which will be calculated and reported for the Impact Study) (Summary form of Cost allocation for transmission lines and transformers will be inserted here if any) None Delivery of Energy Portion of Interconnection Request PJM also studied the delivery of the energy portion of this interconnection request. Any problems identified below are likely to result in operational restrictions to the project under study. The developer can proceed with network upgrades to eliminate the operational restriction at their discretion by submitting a Merchant Transmission Interconnection request. Only the most severely overloaded conditions are listed. There is no guarantee of full delivery of energy for this project by fixing only the conditions listed in this section. With a Transmission Interconnection Request, a subsequent analysis will be performed, which will study all overload conditions associated with the overloaded element(s) identified. Not Applicable PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 4 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Interconnected Transmission Owner s Analysis Results The following was generated by FirstEnergy the Interconnected Transmission Owner, based upon its analysis, as well as that of PJM, for mitigation of the project s impacts on the transmission and lower voltage system as applicable. It includes the costs and schedules for any FirstEnergy system upgrades only. Costs for affected Transmission owners other than FirstEnergy, if applicable, are included and reported in the New System Reinforcements and Contribution to Previously Identified System Reinforcements sections of the PJM Interconnection Study Results above. Power Flow Analysis A Power Flow study was conducted to determine the reliability impact of the proposed South Bend Project on the FE Transmission System. This study was completed using a 2015 summer peak load power flow that contains a detailed representation of the transmission networks in the area of the proposed South Bend Project. The findings and the recommendations from this analysis are based on a contingency review that was performed to identify the facility loadings and/or voltage conditions that violate the ReliabilityFirst, PJM or FE Planning Criteria and are attributable to this project. Note that in accordance with PJM RTEP study procedures, this South Bend queue project under study and earlier active queue projects are considered to be in service. All active queue projects after (Z1-055) are considered not in service. The South Bend Project request for an incremental increase of 10 MW (10 MW capacity) to the existing South Bend generating units was studied. The results of the FE analysis show that there are no network upgrades required for the deliverability of the South Bend Project generation to the FE transmission system. The results from the study Power Flow Analysis showing a comparison of the FE and PJM contingency study results is detailed on Attachment 3. As shown, there also are no reinforcements defined for previous projects for which this project will have an impact, and there are no new upgrades required for the South Bend Project. Short Circuit and Dynamics Analysis A short circuit analysis was not necessary because no electrical characteristics were being modified as part of the South Bend Project. System Protection Analysis Since the South Bend Project only consisted of an existing unit upgrade no system protection analysis was required. Metering PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 5 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Interconnection Customer will be required to comply with all FE Revenue Metering Requirements for Generation Interconnection Customers. The FirstEnergy Revenue Metering Requirements may be found in the FirstEnergy Requirements for Transmission Connected Facilities document located at the following link: www.firstenergycorp.com/feconnect http://www.pjm.com/planning/design-engineering/to-tech-standards.aspx Based on a review of the information provided by Interconnection Customer, no metering changes/ upgrades will be required. Compliance Issues Interconnection Customer will be responsible for meeting all FE criteria as defined in the FE Requirements for Transmission Connected Facilities document referenced above. This includes the provision of a reactive power capability sufficient to maintain a composite power delivery for the facility at the interconnection point at a power factor from.95 leading (absorbing MVARs) to.90 lagging (producing MVARs). Interconnection Customer will also be required to meet all PJM, ReliabilityFirst and NERC reliability criteria and operating procedures for standards compliance. This includes the need to properly locate and report the over and under-voltage and over and under-frequency system protection elements for its units as well as the submission of the generator model and protection data required to satisfy the PJM and ReliabilityFirst audits. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in a disconnection of service if the violation is found to compromise the reliability of the FE system. FE Facility Upgrades and Costs The results of the FE analysis shows that no planning criteria violations are attributable to the addition of the South Bend Project for the conditions studied. Therefore the conclusion is that no Transmission or Subtransmission system reinforcements will be required to provide the requested service. Interconnection Customer Requirements In addition to the FE facilities, Interconnection Customer will be responsible for meeting all criteria as specified in the applicable sections of the "FE Requirements for Transmission Connected Facilities" document. PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 6 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Summary The connection of the South Bend Project to the FE transmission system will require no network upgrades. Since the point of interconnection will remain unchanged Interconnection Customer will not incur any Direct Connection costs for the South Bend Project. The estimated cost to complete all work required for oversight, commissioning, and Transmission Owner power system data updates is $10,000, which does not include taxes if applicable. Note that the FE findings were made from a conceptual review of this project. A more detailed review of this project upgrade will be identified in the System Impact Study. PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 7 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Attachment 1 South Bend (Z1-055) Project Project Location PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 8 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Attachment 2 South Bend (Z1-055) Project 500 kv Point of Interconnection PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 9 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1

Attachment 3 South Bend (Z1-055) Project FE Contingency Analysis Results PJM Interconnection 2014. All rights reserved. 10 PJMDOCS-# 784639-v1