New Visual Tools for Load Allocation Analyses: Using STELLA Software for Water Quality Accounting



Similar documents
Report for 2003PA14B: Spruce Creek Watershed Keystone Project

Open Markets v. Structured Bilateral Trades : Results of Economic Modeling of the Upper Passaic Watershed

Final Report of the Town Owned Lands Improvement Project for the Town of Brentwood, NH

Watershed-Wide Modeling for TMDL/MS4 Permit Compliance. Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering

Maryland s s Nutrient Trading Program. How Trading Works. John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture

Overview of Water Quality Trading Programs

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Wastewater Treatment Story: Three Decades and Counting

Session 9: Analyze Water Quality Data to Characterize the Watershed and Pollutant Sources

Peter J. Strazdas Associate Vice President, Facilities Management Western Michigan University

Draft. Maryland Department of Agriculture Annapolis, Maryland. April Not for Regulatory Purposes

A HYDROLOGIC NETWORK SUPPORTING SPATIALLY REFERENCED REGRESSION MODELING IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

Report prepared by: Kelly Hagan and Mark Anderson Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road Cambridge ON N1R 5W6

Optimal TMDL Development using a Watershed Scale Simulation-Optimization Approach: a Los Angeles County Case Study

Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future

Keywords: beneficial management practices, scenario modelling, source tracing, decision support system, total phosphorus

WATER QUALITY MODELING TO SUPPORT THE ROUGE RIVER RESTORATION

Hydrologic Modeling using HEC-HMS

A White Paper Describing a Watershed-based Monitoring Network Design for the Purgatoire River Basin

Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Solids Concentrations in Tributaries to the Great Bay Estuary Watershed in 2011

Klamath Tracking and Accounting Program Vision

WA Department of Ecology Water Quality Issues in the Dungeness Watersheds. Public Information

Fort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning. Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M.

Permeable Pavement Treatment Capacity

Towards Integrated Water/Watershed Management: Data Strategies. Clay Clifton EcoLayers, Inc.

User s Manual for the BMPTRAINS Model

Flood Mitigation Strategy for the Milwaukee 30 th Street Corridor Redevelopment Program

Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Data Screening, Validation, Reduction, and Reporting RPO-WM03A-TM05.

County Watersheds. Total Project Cost - $11.1 M. Project Description. Funding Sources. Project Milestones. Service Impact

WV Potomac Nutrient Credit Bank and Trade Program. NRCS Conservation Innovation Grant. Final Report

PATUXENT WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (including Pre-Assessment)

Locating Point and Non-point Sources of Escherichia coli in the Mechumps Creek Watershed, Hanover County, Virginia

Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University

Image source: Visual Data Analytics, LLC

Rush River Citizen Monitoring Network 2003 Summary

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

CEDEN March 16, 2015 Workshop Questions

North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan

Trading Nutrient Reductions from Nonpoint Source Best Management Practices in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: Guidance for Agricultural Landowners and

FIVE-YEAR ASSESSMENT REPORT

Water Quality Trading Suitability Analysis. Spokane River Watershed FINAL REPORT

Market-based Incentives to Improve Water Quality:

City of Lakeland s Wetlands Treatment System An Overview

TITLE: [Name of municipality] Storm Water Abatement Feasibility Study

Six Municipalities, One Watershed: A Collaborative Approach to Remove Phosphorus in the Assabet River Watershed

Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Performance Analysis

TECHNICAL SCOPE AND DELIVERABLES. Work will be conducted through the following tasks: PHASE 2: Implementation of Sampling and Analysis Plan

Hydrologic Engineering Techniques for Regional Water Resources Planning

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Current Water Quality Trading Program Applications in the US:

Quantifying Potential Floodplain Restoration Benefits in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, USA

Introduction to the Watershed

WATER QUALITY TRADING WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? Jim Shortle Penn State University STAC Workshop on Water Quality Trading May 14, 2013

Module 3: Refining and Retrieving Data

Empirical Model: Two Basic Types of Models. Why Use Watershed Modeling? Overview of Models for Estimating Pollutant Loads & Reductions

Standards: Human activity has consequences on living organisms and ecosystems. (94412, )

. Address the following issues in your solution:

Accounting for Uncertainty in Offset and Trading Programs

The International Stormwater BMP Database Part 1: Summary of Database

Pollutant Monitoring of Effluent Credit Trading Programs For Agricultural Nonpoint Source Control

Webcast 2: Watershed Treatment Model

PowerWorld Simulator

USING DASHBOARDS AND REPORTS V1.0

Water Quality Trading Internal Management Directive [Early DRAFT for policy forum discussion]

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

IMPROVING SOUTH FORK PEACHTREE CREEK WATERSHED USING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA


5.6.5 UAA Analysis: Temescal Creek

Draft Photo Documentation Update for Proposition 13 Grant Agreement No. San Diego Region McClellan-Palomar Airport Water Quality Treatment Facility

case study 7: south east queensland healthy waterways partnership

AUTOMATED SCHEDULING OF OPEN-CHANNEL DELIVERIES: POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY PROTECTION. Policy for Permitting Surface Water Diversions

DISTRICT VALUES STATEMENTS, GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, AND ONGOING TASKS FOR 2015 Adopted by the Board of Directors December 10, Values Statements.

Who has Entered Objectives on their 2013 ACES Forms? & Exporting Data to Excel

Edgefield Regional Stormwater Treatment (RST) Facility Tri-County Agricultural Area St. Johns River Water Management District

WORKING PAPER How Nutrient Trading Could Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay

Chapter 2 Treatment Facility Menus

Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands

User s Guide for the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Pollutant Loading Tool. EZ Search, Facility Search, and Advanced Search. Version 1.

Watershed Treatment Model for Urban Watersheds. Neely L. Law Watershed Analyst Center for Watershed Protection

2D Modeling of Urban Flood Vulnerable Areas

Assessment of agricultural best management practices using mathematical models: a review

NPDES Permit No. IL Notice No. SKT: bah. Public Notice Beginning Date: April 9, Public Notice Ending Date: May 9, 2014

DEPUTY AUSTRALIA ON TIME 2016

Decision Rationale Total Maximum Daily Loads Potomac River Watershed For Fecal Coliform Bacteria

Kevin DeBell, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gary Shenk, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

WQBELs Part II: Characterizing the Effluent and Receiving Water. David Hair Environmental Engineer US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

2013 Watershed Treatment Model C E N T E R F O R W A T E R S H E D P R O T E C T I O N A U G U S T,

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY OF INVENTORY FINDINGS:

Vision-based sensors for water cycle

The History and Status of Wetland Mitigation Banking and Water Quality Trading

Pre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

ANACOSTIA WATERSHED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PREPARED FOR: MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 255 Rockville Pike, Suite 120

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

City of East Lansing CSO Control Facility Evaluation Demonstrative Approach to Meet WQS

Evaluating Drain Inlet Cleaning as a Storm Water Best Management Practice

Problems and Measures Regarding Waste 1 Management and 3R Era of public health improvement Situation subsequent to the Meiji Restoration

Presented by Dani Wise Johnson Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Transcription:

New Visual Tools for Load Analyses: Using STELLA Software for Water Quality Accounting Kimberly O. Siemens, Kirk S. Westphal, P.E., Daniel G. Bounds, P.E., D.WRE Kimberly O. Siemens, CDM Plaza East Office Center 330 East Kilbourn Ave, Suite 1219 Milwaukee, WI 53202 ABSTRACT STELLA is a visual platform for customized modeling of flow networks and tracking multiple constituents through a water system. STELLA has recently been used as a conservative water quality accounting tool to support total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) TMDL allocation analyses for a large watershed with multiple reaches and discharge inputs. STELLA was chosen as the tool for this purpose due to its visual presentation of reaches, inputs, and variables, as well as its flexibility. STELLA is essentially an open worksheet in which a user builds a network of flow elements, storage elements, and variables to represent any water system. For this TMDL analysis, the mainstem and tributaries were set up in a model within STELLA, and nonpoint source flows and loads from a previously developed model were incorporated, along with point source flows and loads compiled from existing data. MS4 flows and loads were also entered. The baseline pollutant loads were reduced through a series of reduction factors until concentrations met proposed water quality objectives. As needed, STELLA has also been used to simulate first-order decay or attenuation of total phosphorus in impounded flow networks. STELLA provides a visual feature not available with other modeling platforms. The network constructed for the load allocation analyses has a similar on-screen visual structure to the actual river network and interdependencies between system elements are clearly represented. The visual aspect of STELLA makes for a straightforward explanation of how the model works to public stakeholders. It is easy to visualize how the entire water network is constructed conceptually, how reaches and discharges connect to one another, and how pollutants flow through the system and are mathematically reduced. STELLA was chosen for these analyses because the platform can be used to quickly screen through reduction percentages and identify effective allocations reach by reach by examining resulting in-stream concentrations. The model was set up to include both global and local reduction factors. Global reduction factors are applied universally throughout the entire watershed, while local reduction factors can be applied to each individual reach. For each model run, these reduction factors are easily edited on 466

a control interface screen and results can be exported to a spreadsheet for further analysis and load allocation calculations. KEYWORDS TMDL, STELLA, allocation, model, presentation INTRODUCTION STELLA is a visual platform that can be used for customized modeling of flow networks and tracking multiple water quality constituents through a water system. STELLA has recently been used as a conservative water quality accounting tool to support total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) TMDL allocation analyses for a large watershed with numerous reaches and discharge inputs. In addition to requiring a tool that could aggregate information from multiple sources (water quality models, permit databases, etc.), the analyses required a method to rapidly screen alternative load reductions and estimate appropriate load allocations to meet in-stream TP and TSS targets. STELLA was chosen as the tool for this purpose due to its ability to produce a visual presentation of reaches, inputs, and variables, as well as its flexibility to quickly evaluate the effects of a broad range of management alternatives. STELLA is essentially an open worksheet in which a user builds a network of flow elements, storage elements, and variables to represent a water system. For a TMDL allocation analysis, the mainstem and tributaries can be set up in a model within STELLA. Point and non-point source flows and loads can be entered from raw data or from a previously developed model. MS4 flows and loads can also be entered. Using STELLA, the baseline pollutant loads can be reduced through a series of reduction factors for each load category in each reach, until concentrations meet proposed water quality objectives. STELLA can also been used to simulate first-order decay or attenuation of water quality constituents in impounded flow networks. STELLA provides a visual feature not available with other modeling platforms. A model network constructed a load allocation analyses can have a similar on-screen visual structure to the actual river network, and interdependencies between system elements are clearly represented. The visual presentation aspect of STELLA provides for a straightforward explanation to public stakeholders, including how upstream loads and management decisions propagate downstream. It is easy to visualize how the entire water network is constructed conceptually, how reaches and discharges connect to one another, and how pollutants flow through the system and are mathematically analyzed. STELLA was chosen for these analyses because the platform can be used to quickly screen through reduction percentages and identify effective allocations reach by reach by examining resulting in-stream concentrations, both near-field and far-field. 467

The model can be set up to include both global and local reduction factors. Global reduction factors are applied universally throughout the entire watershed, while local reduction factors can be applied to each individual reach. For each model run, these reduction factors are easily edited on a control interface screen and results can be exported to a spreadsheet for further analysis and load allocation calculations. The allocation model is not used to generate new information on pollutant loads or streamflows. Rather, it can be developed as a way to synthesize the routing of existing information through a system and apply simulated load reductions on a reach-by-reach basis. The model can be used to identify load allocations for each reach of a water system. It can also be used to determine load allocations at a downstream endpoint or outlet. MODEL STRUCTURE AND USE A river and its tributaries can be divided into reaches based on the segmentation of a 303(d) list, and additional reaches can be added for river segments not listed on the 303(d) list to represent the entire system. The STELLA structure allows a basic flow network to be developed schematically, and this central network is used to route water through the system of tributaries and mainstem reaches of a river. Parallel networks are then constructed to route pollutants through the system from their point of introduction all the way downstream, or until they are fully attenuated. STELLA is an ideal tool for simulating first order decay dynamics, and can also simulate more complex dynamics if programmed by the user (as one might do with similar programming syntax in a spreadsheet). Even in a conservative allocation analysis, there are many combinations of load allocations that will yield results achieving a water quality target, since most reaches are affected by numerous loads from various sources. Typical allocation methods can be used with STELLA to provide for a sound approach. Figure 1 illustrates the overall model construct for an example water system, containing zoomed in figures to illustrate how pollutants enter each reach and are mathematically reduced, how one reach connects to another, and how the entire water network is constructed conceptually. Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) are shown as example constituents for illustrative purposes. 468

Red PS Tot TP PS Red Load 2 NPS Red Load 2 Tot TP Tot Remain Tot Remain TP TP 2 Hydrograph 2 TP 2 Flow 2 Flows 2 Phosphorus Into 1 Reach TSS Red PS PS Red Load 2 NPS Red Load 2 Local TSS TP TSS Flows 2 Hydrograph 2 TSS Red PS TSS Input Flow 2 TP 2 TSS 2 TSS TP 2 TSS 2 TSS TSS TSS TSS TSS TSS TSS TSS TP TSS 2 Representative Reaches Lbs Remov ed TSS TP Red PS TP N N TP TP TP PS Red Load 3 NPS Red Load 3 N TP N N TP N TP N Local TSS TP MS4 3 TSS MS4 3 MS4 Red 3 MS4 Red 3 Flows 3 Hydrograph 3 TP MS4 3 MS4 3 TSS Red PS TSS Input Flow 3 TP 3 TSS 3 TP N TSS N TP 3 TSS 3 N TSS TSS TSS N TSS N N TSS N TSS N TSS TSS N TP N TSS N Figure 1: Example Model Structure Note: Red arrows indicate transfer of information, blue arrows symbolize actual flows of water, or water quality constituents. 469

CONCLUSION STELLA is a tool that can be used for a variety of TMDL development and water quality analysis where a visual platform adds value for analysis and presentation purposes. Key benefits of using STELLA are the ability to aggregate information from a variety of sources into a dynamic analytical platform, the functionality to quickly screen through load reduction percentages to identify load allocations, and the ability to help explain how upstream decisions affect the entire flow network. 470