Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call



Similar documents
How To Settle Day Ahead Energy, Loss, And Loss For A Day Ahead Market

Business Requirements Specification

Table of Contents. Purpose. Eldorado Intertie and System (Eldorado- Four Corners) Scheduling. Operating Procedure

Convergence Bidding Tutorial & Panel Discussion

Table of Contents. Real-Time Reliability Must Run Unit Commitment and Dispatch (Formerly G-203) Operating Procedure

Wind Power and Electricity Markets

INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATORS (VI + Access Rules vs. ISO vs. ITSO)

CALIFORNIA ISO. Pre-dispatch and Scheduling of RMR Energy in the Day Ahead Market

Overview of Reliability Demand Response Resource

sink asset load power pool ISO pool participant bids operating constraints ancillary service declarations

Two Settlement - Virtual Bidding and Transactions

Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) )

ERCOT Monthly Operational Overview (March 2014) ERCOT Public April 15, 2014

Market Solutions to Loop Flow

Transmission Pricing. Donald Hertzmark July 2008

SETTLEMENT AND BILLING PROTOCOL (SABP) OBJECTIVES, DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE

Demand Response FAQs

Comments on the California ISO MRTU LMP Market Design

Business Practice Manual for Definitions & Acronyms. Version 67

PJM Seams Update: Day-Ahead M2M Revisions to MISO- PJM Joint Operating Agreement

PJM Overview and Wholesale Power Markets. John Gdowik PJM Member Relations

THE STRUCTURE OF AN ELECTRICITY MARKET

Operator Initiated Commitments in RTO and ISO Markets

Enabling 24/7 Automated Demand Response and the Smart Grid using Dynamic Forward Price Offers

CAISO Market Results Interface (CMRI) Interface Specification Fall 2013 Release

2017 Budget and Grid Management Charge Initial Stakeholder Meeting

2014 EIA Energy Conference. Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission

Day-Ahead Commitment Process Implementation Overview - Settlement. January 12, 2006 Edward Arlitt, DACP Project Team

Introduction to the Integrated Marketplace

Market reference prices

Update on Northeast Seams Issues. January 9, 2008 NYISO Management Committee Meeting

2013 Ventyx, an ABB company

PJM LMP Market Overview

Presentation for The National Commission for Energy State Regulation of Ukraine

NV Energy ISO Energy Imbalance Market Economic Assessment

PI.'s"'1-SlttlllIl. bstili

Optimizing Wind Generation in ERCOT Nodal Market Resmi Surendran ERCOT Chien-Ning Yu ABB/Ventyx Hailong Hui ERCOT

Use of Common Information Model (CIM) In Electricity Market at California ISO

Comments on ISO s Third Revised Straw Proposal for Settlement of Interties in Real-Time

Performance Metrics. For Independent System Operators And Regional Transmission Organizations

A market design to support climate policy

Rules on Southern Companies Energy Auction Participation

Workshop B. 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Demand Response Programs: Lessons from the Northeast

PJM Overview of Markets. Georgian Delegation PUCO Office April 11, 2013

Credit Management and the ERCOT Nodal Market

ECCO International, Inc. 268 Bush Street, Suite 3633 San Francisco, CA 94104

An Overview of the Midwest ISO Market Design. Michael Robinson 31 March 2009

How To Understand The Cme Group

NYISO Demand Response Programs: Enrollment

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE (ELECTRICITY SUPPLIER OBLIGATIONS) REGULATIONS No. [XXXX]

GIDAP Cluster Process Updated February 2014

Quantifying the Amount and Economic Impacts of Missing Energy Efficiency in PJM s Load Forecast

PAC7 Customer Specific Procedure

Unlocking Electricity Prices:

Nodal Exchange Contract Specifications

NEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR, INC. WORKING CAPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

DISCLOSURE OF ELECTRICITY PRICING METHODOLOGY PURSUANT TO REQUIREMENT 22 OF THE ELECTRICITY INFORMATION DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 2004

How To Understand The Benefits Of The French Power Market Plan

Consistency of Energy-Related Opportunity Cost Calculations

Preliminary Project Description

Transcription:

Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call Margaret Miller Senior Market Design & Policy Specialist Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call August 13, 2009

Agenda 1:00 1:15 - Plan for Stakeholder Engagement 1:15 1:45 - SC Certification 1:45 2:15 - GMC Allocation 2:15-3:00 - IFM and RUC BCR Uplift charges Slide 2

Plan for Stakeholder Engagement August 13 August 27 September 9 September 11 September 18 October 2 October 29 30 Stakeholder Conference Call Stakeholder Conference Call Stakeholder Conference Call Draft Final Proposal posted MSC Stakeholder Meeting Stakeholder Comments Due ISO Board Meeting Slide 3

Convergence Bidding SC Certification Requirements Wade McCartney Senior Market Design & Policy Specialist Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call August 13, 2009

Certification Requirements In CAISO Markets All CAISO Market Participants must fulfill some registration requirements -- application, training, testing (in some instances), posting credit, disclosing affiliate relationships, and establishing a Fed-wire connection for settlement purposes. Question: Should the Convergence Bidder (CB) Certification Process be modeled more on the CAISO process for Scheduling Coordinator (SC) Certification, or on the application and certification process for the Candidate CRR Holder? Proposal: Because Convergence Bidders will be interfacing with the CAISO in much the same way as a Scheduling Coordinator (SC), the application and certification process for Convergence Bidders (CB) should be modeled on the SC certification process with modifications. Slide 5

Comparison of CAISO SC and CRR Holder Certification Requirements (Part 1 of 2) Certification Step Application Training Testing Scheduling Coordinator (SC) 1. Detailed Settlements At least 120 days before start date. 2. CAISO SC Certification Workshop 1. Fed Wire Test -- To ensure that an SC Applicant can submit payments to/and receive payment from CAISO. 2. Real Time Grid Ops Test -- All SC Applicants must complete real-time and contact drills. These drills demonstrate a twenty-four hour real-time desk capability and sufficient understanding of the CAISO Markets to respond correctly to Dispatch Instructions in a timely manner. 3. Market Proficiency Test to demonstrate proficiency in submitting various types of Bids and Self-Schedules to the CAISO. CRR Holder At least 60-days prior to a CRR Allocation or Auction 1. CRR Allocation, Auction and Secondary Registration System (SRS) 2. CRR Settlements 1. Fed Wire Test -- To ensure that a Candidate CRR Holder can submit payments to/and receive payment from CAISO. Slide 6

Comparison of CAISO SC and CRR Holder Certification Requirements (Part 2 of 2) Certification Step Posting Credit Affiliate Disclosure Scheduling Coordinator (SC) Before Registration. Credit must be posted in accordance with the CAISO Credit Policy and Procedure Guide, http://www.caiso.com/2390/239 0758c49b20.htm l None Required CRR Holder After Registration, but before Auction. Credit must be posted in accordance with CAISO Tariff 12 and the CAISO Credit Policy and Procedure Guide, http://www.caiso.com/2390/2390758c49b20.html Parties may also acquire CRRs from CRR Holders through the Secondary Registration System (SRS) through which CRRs are traded bilaterally. See BPM for CRR, Section 13.2.1. Must notify the CAISO of all affiliates of the Candidate CRR Holder or CRR Holder, that are themselves Candidate CRR Holders, CRR Holders or Market Participants, any Affiliate that participates in an organized electricity market in North America, and any guarantor of any such Affiliate. (See CAISO Tariff 36.7.3 and 39.9) Slide 7

Proposal for Certification for Convergence Bidder (CB) in CAISO Markets Certification Step Application Training Convergence Bidder (CB) Certification Must submit at least 60 days before any CB market activity. New Detailed Settlements Class for CBs Rationale: CBs will only be concerned with Day-Ahead and Real-Time energy settlement and IFM and RUC BCR uplift. 1. Fed Wire Test -- Same as SC. Testing Posting Credit Affiliate Disclosure 2. Real Time Grid Ops Test does not apply to CBs 3. Market Proficiency Test Same as SC, because CB will interface with market systems (SIBR, CMRI, Settlements) Same as for Scheduling Coordinators (SCs): Before Registration. Credit must be posted in accordance with the CAISO Credit Policy and Procedure Guide, http://www.caiso.com/2390/2390758c49b20.htm l Same as for a CRR Holder. Rationale: Affiliate Disclosure is a requirement in other ISO markets, and knowledge of affiliate relationships is required for CRR settlement rule and position limits Slide 8

Convergence Bidding (aka, Virtual Bidding) in Other ISO Markets Virtual Bidding (VB) is viewed as a Market Participant transaction, not as another market participant type. (e.g., check the box if you want to do VB ) Training & Testing: There are no mandatory training or testing requirements for Market Participants in other ISOs, including virtual bidders. Credit & Collateral: Market Participants in other ISOs are required to periodically post adequate credit and collateral prior to engaging in virtual transactions. Affiliate Disclosure is required for all Market Participants in other ISOs, including virtual bidders. Slide 9

GMC Charges to Convergence Bids Don Tretheway Senior Market Product Developer Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call August 13, 2009

GMC Allocated Service Charges Not Applicable to Convergence Bidding Core Reliability Services Demand Charge Core Reliability Services Energy Export Charge Energy Transmission Services Net Energy Charge Energy Transmission Services Uninstructed Deviations Charge Core Reliability Services/Energy Transmission Services Transmission Ownership Rights Charge Market Usage Charge (AS and RTM Markets) Applicable to Convergence Bidding Forward Scheduling Charge Market Usage Charge (DA Market) Settlements, Metering and Client Relations Charge Slide 11

Benchmarking with other ISOs Attempt to align Administrative Cost Recovery to CAISO GMC service charges CRS + ETS + CRS/ETS TOR FS MU MU-FE SMCR Tariff PJM NO $0.0577 Bid/Offer Segment N/A $0.0399 + AC2 per MWh N/A Schedule 9 NYISO NO Variable NO TBD N/A TBD $0.10 per Bid $0.05 Rebate if Cleared MISO NO NO NO ~$0.085 per MWh N/A Schedule 17 ISO-NE NO $0.0050 Submitted NO NO N/A Section 2 $0.06 Cleared CAISO* NO $1.0963 per Schedule NO $0.3000 per MWh $1000 per month Appendix F Schedule 1 Part A * Current rates do not include CB in denominator. Slide 12

Recommendation Apply following GMC service charges to CB: Forward Scheduling Charge Market Usage Charge (DA Market) Settlements, Metering and Client Relations Charge GMC Stakeholder process should be used by market participants to modify Amount of Billing Unit Determination of Billing Unit Slide 13

Convergence Bidding Allocation of IFM and RUC Tier 1 BCR Uplift Margaret Miller Senior Market Design & Policy Specialist Convergence Bidding Stakeholder Conference Call August 13, 2009

Review of Current BCR Tier 1 Uplift Charges IFM Tier 1 Allocated to SCs based on their IFM Scheduled Demand (Load plus Exports) in excess of their IFM Self-Scheduled Generation and IFM Imports SC charged an amount equal to their net positive IFM scheduled demand multiplied by the IFM Uplift Rate RUC Tier 1 Allocated to SCs based on their net negative demand deviation SC charged an amount equal to their Net Negative CAISO Demand Deviation multiplied by the RUC Uplift Rate Slide 15

Review of cost allocation proposal for IFM Tier 1 BCR Uplift to virtual demand described July 2 Straw Proposal IFM Tier 1 Uplift Allocated to virtual demand only when virtual demand + physical demand > ISO Forecast The total virtual demand obligation will equal the quantity that the virtual demand put the IFM solution above the ISO Forecast Allocated to gross virtual demand Slide 16

The ISO is proposing the following revisions to IFM BCR Uplift to Virtual Demand Propose to allocate IFM Tier 1 Uplift to virtual demand when Physical Demand (PD) + Virtual Demand (VD) Virtual Supply (VS) > ISO Forecast Obligation for each SC to pay uplift will be based on quantity of net virtual demand Total system obligation will be equal to the sum of all SCs net virtual demand (MW) Slide 17

Revisions were made because: Prior proposal did not take into consideration virtual supply when determining whether physical demand + virtual demand exceeded ISO forecast Total obligation for virtual demand should be based on each SCs individual contribution to uplift not group contribution Allocation for Tier 1 uplift to each SC should be based on each SCs net virtual demand position rather than gross virtual demand Slide 18

Review of cost allocation proposal for RUC Tier 1 BCR Uplift to virtual demand described July 2 Straw Proposal If the virtual supply cleared in the IFM is = < than virtual demand that cleared in the IFM than there will be no charges for RUC Tier 1 Uplift allocated to virtual supply Total obligation equals the positive system net of virtual supply and virtual demand If there is a virtual supply obligation it will be distributed to all SCs with a net virtual supply position based on their pro-rata share of the total obligation. Slide 19

The ISO proposes the following revisions to RUC Tier 1 Uplift to virtual supply Virtual supply will pay when Physical Demand + Virtual Demand Virtual Supply < Load Forecast Allocation will be to SCs with net virtual supply position System obligation will be equal the total of all SCs net virtual supply Slide 20

Revisions were made because: Prior proposal looked at the positive system net of virtual supply when determining whether or not virtual supply would pay RUC Tier 1 uplift and left effect of virtual demand out of the equation. Total obligation for virtual supply to pay RUC Tier 1 uplift was based on system net of virtual supply and virtual demand instead of each individual SCs contribution based on net virtual supply Slide 21

Review Examples Slide 22

Next Steps Market participants that did not provide comments on the call today or have the desire to provide additional comments may submit written comments via e-mail to mmiller@caiso.com Next call scheduled for August 27 Slide 23