Screen Sharing Performance of Web Conferencing Services. Competitive Analysis. Prepared for Adobe Systems



Similar documents
Manage and Monitor Meeting Bandwidth

Cisco WebEx Video Services User Guide. Getting Started Highlights Frequently Asked Questions Specifications

MICROSOFT. Remote Desktop Protocol Performance Improvements in Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7

Detailed Lab Report DR101115D. Citrix XenDesktop 4 vs. VMware View 4 using Citrix Branch Repeater and Riverbed Steelhead

HDX 3D Version 1.0 Release Notes

HP SkyRoom Frequently Asked Questions

Understanding the Performance of an X User Environment

AdminToys Suite. Installation & Setup Guide

Remote Desktop Protocol Performance

WebEx. Remote Support. User s Guide

PLATO Learning Environment System and Configuration Requirements. for workstations. April 14, 2008

Sage Grant Management System Requirements

MedInformatix System Requirements

Dell Desktop Virtualization Solutions Stack with Teradici APEX 2800 server offload card

Frequently Asked Questions

SAP Business One Hardware Requirements Guide

Dragon NaturallySpeaking and citrix. A White Paper from Nuance Communications March 2009

Delphi 2015 SP1-AP1 System Requirements

Video Conferencing - Watching

Setting up for Adobe Connect meetings

ORGANIZER QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE. Install GoToMeeting. Schedule a Meeting. Start a Scheduled Meeting. Start an Instant Meeting.

Web Conferencing from Brother BOARDROOM QUALITY WEB AND VIDEO CONFERENCING MADE EASY.

It s Time for WAN Optimization to Evolve to Meet the Needs of File Collaboration

BOARDROOM-QUALITY WEB AND VIDEO CONFERENCING MADE EASY.

Webcasting vs. Web Conferencing. Webcasting vs. Web Conferencing

Dell Digital Signage. One Solution. Infinite Possibilities.

SMART Meeting Pro 3 software

Your Assistant Collaboration Module

SMART Meeting Pro 3 software

Reviewer s Guide. Morpheus Photo Animation Suite. Screenshots. Tutorial. Included in the Reviewer s Guide:

Instant Net Conference with Cisco WebEx Meeting Center

Web Conferencing Glossary

Conditions affecting performance of a WebEx session.

WebEx. Network Bandwidth White Paper. WebEx Communications Inc

Datacolor TOOLS. Datacolor TOOLS QCX. Datacolor TOOLS WORKSTATION

Freemium v Desktop Video Conferencing: The Value of Being Built for Business. Sponsored by

Cisco Virtualization Experience Client 4000 Release 1.0

Successful WebEx Meetings

Hardware and Software

Getting Started with Microsoft Office Live Meeting. Published October 2007

AT&T Unified Communications Voice. IP Communicator Installation Guide

Getting Started with Microsoft Office Live Meeting. Published October 2007 Last Update: August 2009

System requirements for MuseumPlus and emuseumplus

Handling Multimedia Under Desktop Virtualization for Knowledge Workers

Remote Desktop Services

THOMSON REUTERS EIKON PC REQUIREMENTS THOMSON REUTERS EIKON 4.0

Trademark Notice. Copyright Notice

Introduction to Adobe Connect Video Conferencing System

CAMBRIDGE CELTA COURSE ONLINE FAQ SHEET

FileMaker Pro 13. Using a Remote Desktop Connection with FileMaker Pro 13

AT&T Connect Video Conferencing Functional and Architectural Overview. v9.5 October 2012

OpenScape Web Collaboration

Remote Network Accelerator

Delphi+ System Requirements

Installing Emageon PACS Remote Ultravisual

Service Schedule for BT Web Conferencing Service powered by Microsoft Live Meeting

Vennfer v.1.0. A software based video conferencing system

How To Install Sedar On A Workstation

help BT Conference Call User Guide Web Conferencing powered by WebEx Further

Welcome To Paragon 3.0

Getting Started with WebEx Training Center

Introducing Web Conferencing Tools

White paper. Rapidly Deliver Microsoft Offi ce 2007 with Citrix XenApp

Screen-Sharing Tools and Technology A mini-guide

HP Workstations for Adobe Creative Cloud

White Paper: Performance of Host-based Media Processing

Pfeiffer. User Interface Friction Benchmarks: Windows Vista vs. Windows XP and Mac OS X. Client: Document: Independent Research Project

Audio and Web Conferencing

OpenScape Web Collaboration

Dimdim Web Meeting User s Guide 1 February,

PLATO Learning Environment System and Configuration Requirements for workstations. October 27th, 2008

COLLABORATION TOOLS FOR EFFECTIVE MULTI-NATIONAL COLLABORATION ACTIVITIES

FileMaker Pro 12. Using a Remote Desktop Connection with FileMaker Pro 12

Web Conferencing Version 8.3 Troubleshooting Guide

Introduction to Digital Video

PLATO Learning Environment 2.0 System and Configuration Requirements. Dec 1, 2009

Successful Web Meetings

March 2015 Version #1.2. Required Software Installation for using the DHS Section 508 Compliance Test Process for Applications

Reserved Net Conference with Cisco WebEx Event Center Frequently Asked Questions

Aqua Accelerated Protocol (AAP) For Mac User Manual

White Paper A Case Study Comparing Data Access Methods Using Remote Graphics Software and Siemens PLM Software, Teamcenter 2007 and NX 5

Getting Started with WebEx Access Anywhere

Making a Case for Including WAN Optimization in your Global SharePoint Deployment

Medical 360 Network Edition and Citrix

XDS Multi-windowing display management system

Setting Up a One-Click Meeting

FabulaTech Products Advanced Communications Solutions

EMA Product Brief: Desktop Virtualization with Quest

AT&T Connect Video conferencing functional and architectural overview

Testing Network Performance with Real Traffic

How To Create A Desktop Computer From A Computer Or Mouse And Keyboard (For Business)

Worry-FreeTM. Business Security Standard and Advanced Editions. System Requirements. Administrator s Guide. Securing Your Journey to the Cloud8

NETWORK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS

Accelerating Microsoft Windows 7 migrations with Citrix XenApp

Sage 100 Standard ERP Version 2013 Supported Platform Matrix Created as of November 21, 2013

Windows Embedded Compact 7: RemoteFX and Remote Experience Thin Client Integration

Computer Aided Dispatch & Mobile Digital Communicator

This Deployment Guide is intended for administrators in charge of planning, implementing and

How To Test The Avocent Ds Series Kvm Over Ip System On A Ds View 3 On A Pc Or Mac Or Ip Computer

What Salespeople Need to Know About Video Conferencing

Transcription:

Screen Sharing Performance of Web Conferencing Services Competitive Analysis Prepared for Adobe Systems Prepared by: Heather Petersen handl Consulting

Table of Contents Introduction...1 The Next Generation of Web Conferencing...1 Delivering a Quality Experience through Screen Sharing...1 Latency... 1 Smoothness... 1 Fidelity... 2 Bandwidth... 2 Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional: A Better Screen Sharing Experience for Users and IT...3 Minimal Latency, Maximum Smoothness, and True Fidelity with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional... 3 Efficient Bandwidth Consumption with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional... 5 Conclusion...5 Exhibit A: Screen Sharing Testing Methodology...6 Exhibit B: Configuring Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional...8 Exhibit C: What s New: Improved Performance with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional...9

Introduction As web conferencing becomes increasingly prevalent, users are seeking more sophisticated experiences. Critical to a successful web conferencing experience is the ability of the presenter to share rich content on their screen with meeting attendees. With new Turbo Screen Sharing TM capabilities, Adobe Acrobat Connect TM Professional s screen sharing capabilities outperform the industry. Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional offers users the ability to have a more productive and engaging web conferencing experience while providing the IT department with a program that efficiently utilizes bandwidth and minimally impacts the infrastructure. The Next Generation of Web Conferencing The popularity of web conferencing has been fueled by a desire to increase productivity by easing communications among workers with a way to meet instantly and cost-effectively. While the distributed workforce has never been farther apart geographically, we are now virtually closer together than ever. As popularity increases, web conferencing users are demanding more sophisticated experiences, seeking to emulate real-world productivity in this modern, online space. Collaboration in web conferencing is common through screen sharing, where a conference leader displays the content of their computer screen to the other meeting attendees. The conference leader can show his or her desktop, sharing information with attendees such as important documents, websites, or other items of interest. Beyond basic documents, rich content such as video and graphically intense presentations, is increasingly shared to help keep web conferencing users engaged and help provide an added dimension to the online conferencing experience. While rich content increases and improves the web conferencing experience for users, the data intensive nature of rich content can strain hardware infrastructure and push bandwidth capabilities to their limits. The next generation of web conferencing requires a rich user experience that can be supported by a technology infrastructure that works. Delivering a Quality Experience through Screen Sharing A quality experience for web conferencing users is one that maximizes the ability of the presenter to deliver a seamless experience to web conferencing attendees. Specifically, it enables the presenter to provide a web conferencing experience with minimal latency, maximum smoothness, and true fidelity, all while efficiently managing bandwidth. Latency Latency is the time delay between the moment something is initiated, and the moment one of its effects begins or becomes detectable. In web conferencing screen sharing, it is the delay between when the presenter initiates an activity, such a through a mouse click or a cursor move on their screen, and when an attendee observes the same action on their computer locally. Shorter latency means less lag time between the presenter and the attendee resulting in a more real-time experience. This also means the attendee is less likely to get lost in an interaction and that all participants can literally be on the same page at the same time. Smoothness A smooth experience is one that flows easily with a minimum of choppiness. In screen sharing, what underlies a smooth experience is often a high frame rate, where the screen is able to produce a high number of unique consecutive images (frames) on a per second basis. A high frame rate means that the experience of seeing a video or graphically rich presentation via web conferencing is more similar to watching television, where video and audio are synchronized, 1

where images are clear, and where the experience flows. A smooth experience has a higher quality feel to it, and it allows the web conferencing attendees to focus on the message or content the presenter is delivering, rather than be distracted by obvious technology glitches or imperfections. Fidelity Fidelity denotes how accurate a copy is to its source. When screen sharing, a presentation with perfect fidelity looks identical to both the presenter and attendee. Fidelity is important because the more similar the presentations are, the higher likelihood there is of the presenter being able to clearly get across his visual message, reducing the risk that the attendees misread or misinterpret something in the web conferencing room. When graphics, shapes, and colors, are truer and more consistent, the web conferencing experience is improved. Bandwidth Bandwidth consumption is not readily apparent to the web conferencing user but the effects of inefficient bandwidth utilization can often be clearly seen in the web conferencing room. A web conferencing system that is able to deliver a high-quality experience delivering minimal latency, maximum smoothness, and true fidelity while utilizing less bandwidth means a more consistently positive experience for all users. Users in low bandwidth settings those in branch offices, working from home, traveling on the road can still have a very high-quality experience if bandwidth utilization is efficient with the web conferencing service. Additionally, when corporate networks are congested, efficient use of bandwidth allows for a better experience for users, with less impact on the network for IT. 2

Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional: A Better Screen Sharing Experience for Users and IT With Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional s new Turbo Screen Sharing capabilities, screen sharing users can expect to see minimal latency, maximum smoothness, and true fidelity, with very efficient bandwidth consumption. In tests that compared Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional to the industry average, Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional screen sharing consistently outperformed, offering users the ability to have a high-quality web conferencing experience while minimizing the impact on IT. The performance test materials included a graphically intense PowerPoint file and a fast moving video being streamed from a website. The industry average or standard is defined as the mean of the performance of WebEx Meeting Center TM, Microsoft Live Meeting, Citrix GoToMeeting, and Yugma TM, using the metrics outlined below. Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional SP3 was tested. Minimal Latency, Maximum Smoothness, and True Fidelity with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional s Turbo Screen Sharing Capabilities Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional offers a superior web conferencing experience with screen sharing abilities that exceed the industry average in all areas minimizing latency, maximizing smoothness, and providing true fidelity. Minimal Latency Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional has no discernable latency between the time the content was presented and the screen share image was received and it outperformed the industry standard: Latency Comparison: Adobe Connect Pro 1.00 Industry Standard 2.25 1 2 3 4 5 No latency Unusable Latency Scale: 1 = no latency (between 0s and 0.5s) 2 = little latency (between 0.5s and 1.5s) 3 = some latency (between 1.5s and 5s) 4 = high latency (above 5s) 5 = unusable (above 20s) 3

Maximum Smoothness Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional has smoother performance than the industry standard, allowing for a screen sharing experience that flows better, with less choppiness: Smoothness Comparison: Adobe Connect Pro 2.00 Industry Standard 3.00 1 2 3 4 5 Very Smooth Unusable Smoothness Scale: 1 = very smooth 2 = smooth 3 = choppy 4 = very choppy 5 = unusable True Fidelity Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional has fidelity that is superior to the industry standard, demonstrating colors and gradients that are truer to the original source material being shared: Fidelity Comparison: Adobe Connect Pro 1.50 Industry Standard 2.00 1 2 3 4 5 High Fidelity Unusable Fidelity Scale: 1 = high fidelity 2 = good fidelity 3 = some fidelity 4 = poor fidelity 5 = unusable 4

Efficient Bandwidth Consumption with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional While delivering a high-quality user experience, Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional also minimizes bandwidth consumption, utilizing far less bandwidth than the industry standard: Total Bandwidth Consumption Comparison: Adobe Connect Pro 93,752 Industry Standard 228,703 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 kbits Total bandwidth consumption reflected above was measured on a total kilobits received basis, for the PowerPoint file and the streamed video combined, and were measured using through the logging functionality available through the My Computer Management Tool. More efficient bandwidth consumption means that Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional users are likely to have a better web conferencing experience in a variety of settings such as from remote offices, home offices, or while traveling. This also means that in high-traffic times, when networks are congested, the Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional web conferencing experience is likely to be far better. While users benefit from this experience, IT departments also see less strain on their infrastructure and hear better user feedback on the quality of applications they provide. Please see Exhibit A: Screen Sharing Testing Methodology for more information on the screen sharing testing and results. Conclusion Today s web conferencing often includes the sharing of content rich material via screen sharing. To be successful, screen sharing performance should include minimal latency, maximum smoothness, and true fidelity. At the same time, the screen sharing of rich content should be done efficiently to minimize the bandwidth required and the impact on the network. Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional, with Turbo Screen Sharing capabilities, outperforms the industry average on all of these metrics and delivers a superior screen sharing experience. To learn more about how Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional can help your organization, please contact your Adobe sales representative at 1-888-649-2990 or www.adobe.com/products/acrobatconnectpro. Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional and Turbo Screen Sharing are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the U.S. or other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 5

Exhibit A: Screen Sharing Testing Methodology Products Tested The following products, equally weighted, comprise the industry average : Product Version WebEx Meeting Manager/Meeting Center Trial Version 7.5.3 L Microsoft Live Meeting Trial Version 7.9.3006.0 Citrix GoToMeeting Trial Version 3.0 Build 198 Yugma Trial Version 2.0.4.5 Materials Tested Two files, a PowerPoint and a video being streamed from a website, were used in the testing. The content included high resolution graphics, video and animation with rapidly moving content. The same files were used for all tests. PowerPoint Presentation File Size Run Length PresentationTest3.ppt 13.9 MB (14,626,816 bytes) 4 min 6 sec (246 sec) Streaming Video File Size Dimensions Run Length Trailer from http://spiderman3.sonypictures.com/ n/a (streaming content) 537 x 255 (h x v pixels) 2 min 35 sec (155 sec) Test Environment The following systems were used for all testing: Presenter System Client System System Model Dell Precision Workstation 670 Dell OptiPlex GX260 Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 Microsoft Windows XP Professional 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 10 GenuineIntel ~3192 Mhz x 2 x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 7 GenuineIntel ~2656 Mhz Physical RAM 2 GB 2 GB Test Procedure Latency, Smoothness, and Fidelity were tested using the same content (outlined above) multiple times to ensure accuracy. Bandwidth consumption was measured using the logging functionality available through the My Computer Management Tool. Consumption was measured on a total kilobits received basis and also on an average kilobits received basis on the client system. These tests were also run multiple times to ensure accuracy. Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional utilized the Fast Images setting. For other vendors who did not offer similar settings, the default settings were used. All tests were independently run and verified by handl Consulting in conjunction with Shasta QA. Metrics Used Latency, Smoothness, and Fidelity were each rated on a scale of 1 to 5: 6

Latency Smoothness Fidelity Lag time between the content being Level of smoothness on the Fidelity of the content being presented and the screen share image being screen refresh from the shared, with particular attention received. participant point of view. to the colors and gradient 1 no latency (between 0s and 0.5s): latency is very smooth: no perception of any high fidelity: screen by screen hardly perceivable when making a screen by frame being dropped. comparison shows that colors screen comparison and gradient are preserved. 2 little latency (between 0.5 and 1.5s): latency is noticeable on screen by screen smooth: some choppiness but the overall experience is really good fidelity: screen by screen comparison shows that some comparison but would not be noticeable in a web conference. smooth. colors are not exactly the same. 3 some latency (between 1.5s and 5s): latency is noticeable looking only at the participant screen. choppy: content refresh is choppy all the time. some fidelity: screen by screen comparison shows that 50% of the colors are well rendered while the other 50% are not. 4 high latency (above 5s): there is a significant very choppy: choppiness impacts poor fidelity: screen by screen delay which really impairs the screen sharing experience. the quality of the content shared and participant lose a significant amount of information. comparison shows that most colors are not properly rendered. 5 unusable (above 20s): latency is so high that any screen refresh takes more than 20s to reach participant. unusable: the content being screen shared is unwatchable because it is too choppy. unusable: screen by screen comparison shows that all colors scheme are not consistent. Bandwidth utilization was captured by: Total bandwidth (kbits) Average bandwidth (kbits) Results of both files were combined. Results Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional results were above average in all categories: Adobe Acrobat Connect SP3 Industry Average Latency 1 2.25 Smoothness 2 3 Fidelity 1.5 2 Total Bandwidth Consumption 93,752 kbits 228,703 kbits Average Bandwidth Consumption 256 kbits 692 kbits 7

Ex hibit B: Configuring Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional At the start of a web conference, presenters can choose from three screen sharing settings to maximize the screen sharing experience for conference participants. At the top of Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional, under Menu, presenters will now be able to select three options within Optimize Screen Sharing: Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional: New Screen Sharing Settings Low Bandwidth Default setting. Ideal for low bandwidth environments, this setting delivers lower frame rate with 75% of the quality of highest quality. Fast Images Best for higher bandwidth environments, this setting delivers higher frame rates with 75% of highest quality. High Quality When the quality of the material is most important, this setting delivers lower frame rate with the highest quality the codec delivers and very close to the original source image. Additionally, bandwidth settings can also be adjusted by the presenter from the LAN (Local Area Network) default setting to a DSL/Cable setting, or Modem settings, to accommodate participants in lower bandwidth environments. 8

Exhibit C: What s New: Improved Performance with Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional Existing Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional users will benefit from an improved screen sharing experience --- with less latency, more smoothness, and higher fidelity. Additionally, Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional has become even more efficient with bandwidth consumption, offering better quality even in low bandwidth settings, with less strain on IT. With new technology, Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional has the following improvements: Less latency Delays between what is presented and what is seen by attendees has been reduced, providing a more real-time web conferencing experience, even with rich content. More smoothness Fast moving, data intensive content, is now presented more smoothly, allowing complex PowerPoint and video, to flow better. Higher fidelity Content is now truer to its source than before, so screen sharing presenters and web conferencing attendees can enjoy more consistency with images, colors, and gradients. More efficient bandwidth consumption While offering a better user experience, Adobe Acrobat Connect Professional also utilizes less bandwidth than before, enabling attendees in low bandwidth areas or congested situations, better access to rich content. 9