Wolf Creek Hydropower Rehabilitation Analysis Report

Similar documents
Jeff Haby, P.E. Director Sewer System Improvements. September 15, Agenda

How To Build A Powerhouse

NASHVILLE DISTRICT JETS SAME

HYDROMATRIX Jebel Aulia - Sudan

Mini & Micro Hydro Power Generation. EBARA Hatakeyama Memorial Fund Tokyo, Japan

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

CSP. Feranova Reflect Technology. klimaneutral natureoffice.com DE gedruckt

FINANCIAL RESULTS Q May 2012

Appendix N: GENERATOR DATA SHEET FOR SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS CONNECTED TO PG&E ELECTRIC SYSTEM

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

FINANCIAL RESULTS Q1 2016

PacifiCorp Original Sheet No. 476 FERC Electric Tariff, Substitute 6 th Rev Volume No. 11 APPENDIX 2 TO SGIP

Vectren Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Stakeholder Meeting 3 of 3. Discussion of Analysis Results September 24, 2014

Ontario Wholesale Electricity Market Price Forecast. Ontario Energy Board

TEACHING SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport District Energy Plant Upgrades Project Making More with Less Sustainable Communities Conference Dallas, TX

SGT5-8000H SCC5-8000H 1S. Experience of Commercial Operation at Irsching 4. ANIMP-ATI, Sesto San Giovanni 26 June 2012

Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

APPENDIX F. Baker County. Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. P Turbidity Monitoring Plan

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Nashville District Workload for Nashville SAME Professional Development Workshop

Electric Power Systems An Overview. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas

AZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA

Request for Payment Instructions Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Attachment I - GIP

Effective: September 10, 2006 Vermont Attachment 1 to Rule Public Service Board Page 1 of 6

Powerformer chosen for Swedish combined heat and power plant

Transitions. Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc Annual Report

Decision Method for Unit Rehabilitation. John Yale Hydro Plant Engineering Manager Chelan County PUD

US Army Corps of Engineers. Vision Statement. Be the premier stewards of entrusted hydropower resources

PMDD WIND TURBINE 1.5MW

WIND TURBINE TECHNOLOGY

Welcome to our open house. Thanks for coming. Please sign in and help yourself to refreshments. Energizing your community.

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015

Commissioning of 87,000-kW Kaplan Turbine and Generator for Otori Power Station

TAKING ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS TO THE NEXT LEVEL: MICRO-HYDRO

Session 2: Hot Water Supply

Appendix D: Electricity Price Forecast Preliminary Draft

EFFICIENT ENERGY SUPPLY (ELECTRICITY AND DISTRICT HEAT) FOR THE CITY OF LINZ

525-MVA Generator-motor and Thyristor Starter Put into Service at the Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. s Kannagawa Hydroelectric Power Station

HydroHelp 1 AN EXCEL PROGRAM DEVELOPED FOR TURBINE-GENERATOR SELECTION FOR HYDROELECTRIC SITES

Section 2. Mono Basin Operations

FINANCIAL RESULTS Q2 2015

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

RENEWABLE ENERGIES GROWTH DRIVERS

PJM Electric Market. PJM Electric Market: Overview and Focal Points. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Market Oversight

Risk Mitigation Strategy. Lewiston Pump Generating Plant Life Extension and Modernization Program

Availability Assessment of Generating Units of Balimela Hydro Electric Power Station (510 MW) A Markovian Approach

Excitation.

IMIA. Wind Turbine Generators. Claims. Codan Insurance / September 2007 Risk Engineer Truels Kjer

ENERGY CONTRACT Management PACIA August 2010

Natural Gas Wholesale Prices at PG&E Citygate as of November 7, 2006

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

Chelan County PUD. Rock Island Rehabilitation Powerhouse One Units B5 to B8

B O A R D M E E T I N G N a s h v i l l e, T e n n e s s e e November 6, 2014

JUBILEE TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTRE TAKORADI POLYTECHNIC 2015 TRAINING PROGRAMMES

ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Power Supply Systems and Electrical Equipment for Desalination Plants - Y.M. Hamud and A.H.

Week number 46-9 nov - 15 nov year 2015, version: A

Buildings Construction Procurement Strategy

Natural Gas / Electricity and the Industrial Sector. The Dismantling of US Manufacturing

UNDERSTANDING YOUR UTILITY BILL A GUIDE FOR BUSINESSES IN OHIO

Power Plant Electrical Distribution Systems

Concepts and Experiences with Capacity Mechanisms

STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN QUARTERLY KPI REPORT FOR: FISCAL YEAR 2015, QUARTER 2 (JULY THROUGH DECEMBER 2014)

Energy Purchasing Strategy Mid-year Review 2015

Emissions Comparison for a 20 MW Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Power Plant

PRESENTATION TITLE. Corps of Engineers Agreement with. Columbia Riverkeeper Regarding Hydropower Plant Discharges

Overview on SEA output

EDF TRADING A leader in the international wholesale energy market. 13 th November 2013

A. 5MWp SPV Plant at Khimsar, Rajasthan. B. 5MWp SPV Plant Installed Technologies. D. 5MWp SPV Plant Challenges. E. 5MWp SPV Plant - Performance

Suzanne Minter. Manager, Oil and Gas Consulting BENTEK Energy. Natural Gas Outlook

Minimizing Impact of Electric Utility Outages with Backup Generation

Power Generation Division

Jet Propulsion System

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Adjusted Estimates of Texas Natural Gas Production

Assessment of Impact of Hydropower Dams Reservoir Outflow on the Downstream River Flood Regime Nigeria s Experience

UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NORTH CAMPUS DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN

Natural Gas: Winter Abundance! and Some Confusion

NORDEX USA, INC. GREAT LAKES SYMPOSIUM

Society of American Military Engineers Omaha District

Energy Storage Activities at New York Power Authority

Performance Improvement of Pump-turbine for Large Capacity Pumped Storage Power Plant in USA

Smart Metering Initiative ADWEA Program

Flood mitigation program for Gatun lake. Programa de mitigación de inundaciones del lago Gatún

ENERGY STAR for Data Centers

Transcription:

Wolf Creek Hydropower Rehabilitation Analysis Report David Bishop Kris Atanassov Team Cumberland, September 16, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers

Agenda Overview Water Availability Energy Modeling Preliminary Alternatives Equipment Uprate Potential & Scope of Work 2

Wolf Creek Power Plant Location: Russell County, KY River Mile 460.9 Generation: 6 Units @ 45 MW 270 MW Commissioned: 1952 3

Award: May 13, 2015 AE Contract Contractor: MWH Global Configurations Minimum of three studied a. Replace in-kind. b. Uprated Turbines & Generators c. Different sized units (Low Flow/High Flow) Goal - Determine the Preferred Rehabilitation Option 4

Milestones Site Visit June 2015 Provide Water Data June 2015 Methodology Report July 2015 Scoping of Alternatives September 2015 Draft Report January 2016 Comment Resolution March 2016 Final Draft Report (to Customers) April 2016 Stakeholder Workshop May 2016 5

Available Data: USACE flow estimates, based on like-new equipment lookup table for powerplant releases. USGS daily flow record for Rowena station (partial). Basis for Flow Dataset: Flow Data Revised estimate of efficiency, reflecting 1987 condition, analyzing overlapping data, and applying an annual degradation of 0.03333% (beginning 1988). Flow estimates through the sluice gates and spillway was left as-is and assumed to be correct.

Flow and Gross Head Duration Curves

Average historical reservoir level (1989 2006) vs. SEPA band 723 ft and 623 ft are the upper and lower power pool elevations, respectively SEPA Band

Energy Model Hourly (peaking) Data: Adjusted outflow, 1989 2006 Outflow rather than inflow to reduce the number of variables / potential sources of error (multipurpose reservoir; SEPA band not strictly followed) Hourly water levels from USACE Equipment efficiency estimates and operating limits Validation: By hour: overestimates by 0.6%, avg. (median, 0.1%). By month (assuming constant MW w/in ea. hr): 0.0%, avg. Analyses: Each rehab scenario Sensitivity cases changes to: Min. release requirements Max. allowable releases under normal op. conditions M&I withdrawals

Energy Value Projections Sources: 2015 Energy Information Administration s (EIA) Annual Energy Outlook (AEO) Projections for generation price through 2040 for SERC Reliability Corporation / Central (SRCE) region Assumptions: Value ~ 80% of AEO s generation price to reflect wholesale prices Peak to off-peak ratio was based on the ratio of gas to coal fuel costs (2015 2040 projections from AEO) Winter (Nov. Apr.) Peak: weekdays, 4 AM to 10 AM, central Off-peak: all other times Summer (May Oct.) Peak: 12 (noon) to 8 PM, central Off-peak: all other times

Preliminary Alternatives Base/Alternative 1: 6 units, 57.5 MVA (51.75 MW @ 0.9 pf) Alternative 2: 5 units, 75 MVA (67.5 MW @ 0.9 pf) and 1 unit, 26.7 MVA (24.4 MW @ 0.9 pf) Alternative 3: 6 units, 75 MVA (67.5 MW @ 0.9 pf) 11

75 MVA Uprate Selection Criteria 1) Flow Limitations (max 5,600 cfs at 95% wicket gate opening at nominal net head) 2) Net Head by Exceedance Exceedance 12 Net Head, ft 2% Max infrequent 179.7 10% Max normal 174.6 50% Nominal (Rated) 160.3 70% Other 152.7 85% Min normal 146.1 95% Min infrequent 141.0 3) Flow by Exceedance Exceedance Flow, cfs 2% 30,751 10% 23,966 50% 7,239 61% 2200 >62% 20 4) Equipment Limits

Turbine Uprate Potential Component Max Uprate Potential @ 160 ft Hnet Component Max Uprate Potential @ 160 ft Hnet Runner 60.4 MW Bottom Ring Over 68.8 MW 1 Spiral case Over 68.8 MW 1 Servomotor Over 68.8 MW 1 Stay Ring 68.8 MW 1 Turbine Shaft 68.8 MW Facing Plates Over 68.8 MV Shaft Coupling Wicket Gates 60.4 MW Shaft Seal Over 68.8 MW 1 Operating ring Over 68.8 MW 1 Wearing Rings Over 68.8 MW 1 Discharge Ring Over 68.8 MW 1 Turbine Guide bearing Over 68.8 MW 1 Draft Tube Over 68.8 MW 1 Generator Combined Bearing Over 68.8 MW 1 Head Cover Over 68.8 MW 1 Generator Upper Guide Bearing 1) Subject to validation by the Contractor s hydraulic design 2) The uprate potential is power transfer at shaft Over 68.8 MW 1 13

Turbine Scope of Work Component Alternative 1 6 x 57.5 MW Alternative 2 5 x 68.8 MW Alternative 2 1 x 24.4 MW Alternative 3 6 x 68.8 MW Runner Replace Replace Replace Replace Spiral case Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Stay Ring Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Facing Plates Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Wicket Gates Replace Replace Replace Replace Operating ring Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Discharge Ring Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Draft Tube Cone Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Draft Tube Elbow Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Head Cover Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse

Turbine/Governor Scope of Work Component Alternative 1 6 x 57.5 MW Alternative 2 5 x 68.8 MW Alternative 1 x 24.4 MW Bottom Ring Reuse Reuse Replace Reuse Servomotor Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Turbine Shaft Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Shaft Coupling Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Shaft Seal Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Wearing Rings Replace with runner Replace with runner Replace with runner Alternative 3 6 x 68.8 MW Replace with runner Turbine Guide bearing Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Generator Combined Bearing Generator Upper Guide Bearing Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Governor Replace Replace Replace Replace

Turbine Alternative 2 Scope of Work Low Flow Unit 24.4MW --New Turbine 16

Generator Uprate Potential Component Housing and Foundation Max Uprate Potential Component Max Uprate Potential Over 75 MVA Shaft 68.8 MVA Stator Winding 57.5 MVA Shaft Coupling 74.7 MVA Stator Core 67MVA Brakes and Jacks Over 75 MVA Stator Frame Over 75MVA High Pressure Oil Lift System Not available Field Winding 57.5 MVA Cooling System 75 MVA Damper Winding 70.5 MVA Brush Rigging and Collector Ring 61 MVA Pole Leads Over 81 MVA Upper Bracket Over 75 MVA Collector Rings 61 MVA Lower Bracket Over 75 MVA Spider 87 MVA Fire Protection System Over 75MVA Spider / shaft 74.5 MVA PMG & Standstill Over 75 MVA

Generator Scope of Work Component Alternative 1 57.5 MVA Housing and Foundation Alternative 2 5 x 75 MVA Alternative 2 1 x 26.7 MVA Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Alternative 3 6 x 75 MVA Stator Winding Replace Replace Replace Replace Stator Core Reuse Replace Reuse Replace Stator Frame Reuse Replace Reuse Replace Field Winding Reinuslate Reinsulate Reinsulate Reinsulate Damper Winding Reuse Reuse 1) Reuse Reuse 1) Pole Leads Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Collector Rings Reuse Replace Reuse Replace Spider Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Spider / shaft Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Shaft Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse 1) Negative sequence relay needs to be reset

Generator Scope of Work Component Alternative 1 57.5 MVA Alternative 2 5 x 75 MVA Alternative 2 1 x 26.7 MVA Alternative 3 6 x 75 MVA Shaft Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Shaft Coupling Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Brakes and Jacks Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse High Pressure Oil Lift System Not available Not available Not available Not available Cooling System Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Brush Rigging and Collector Ring Reuse Replace Reuse Replace Upper Bracket Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Lower Bracket Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Fire Protection System Reuse Reuse Reuse Reuse Exciter Replace Replace Replace Replace

Powertrain Limits and Scope of Work Component Current Limit Alt. 1 57.5 MVA Alt. 2 5 x 75 MVA Alt. 2 1 x 26.7 MVA Alt. 3 6 x 75 MVA Generator Bus 59.7 MVA Reuse Replace Reuse Replace Generator Circuit Breaker Power Cables Generator Stepup Transformer Switchyard Unit Breaker 103.8MVA, 50kA interrupting 67.5 MVA @ 40 C 112.5 MVA (56.25 MVA) Reuse Reuse 1 Reuse Reuse 1 Reuse 2 Replace Reuse 2 Replace Reuse Replace Replace Replace Replace 3 Replace 3 Replace Replace Replace 1)Replacement may be required based on short-circuit study 2)Cable replacement may be required due to condition 3)1200 OCB is undersized and reached the end of its useful life

Questions? Dave Bishop U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nashville District 615-736-7856 dave.bishop@usace.army.mil 21

USACE Water Data Data Units Type Timestep Start Date End Date Energy (Observed) MWh per-average hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Energy-Net (Obs.) MWh per-average hourly 30-Nov-94 28-May-15 Flow-Gate (Obs.) cfs per-average hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Flow-ResOut (Obs.) cfs per-average hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Flow-Turbine (Obs.) cfs per-average hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Headwater Level (Obs.) ft instantaneous value hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Tailwater Level (Obs.) ft instantaneous value hourly 1-Jan-89 28-May-15 Energy (Obs.) MWh per-cumulative daily 1-Jan-98 14-May-12 Flow-Gate (Obs.) cfs per-average daily 8-Aug-50 15-Jan-15 Flow-ResOut (Obs.) cfs per-average daily 8-Aug-50 15-Jan-15 Flow-Turbine (Obs.) cfs per-average daily 8-Aug-50 15-Jan-15 Inflow (Obs.) cfs per-average daily 1-Sep-50 7-Jan-14 Headwater Level (Obs.) ft instantaneous value daily 7-Aug-50 31-Dec-14 Tailwater Level (Obs.) ft per-average daily 2-Jan-89 31-Dec-05 Hourly model (peaking operation) Yellow rows = data used in the model 2007 through 2013 were excluded due to water level restrictions

Flow Data On average, adjusted hourly flow estimates as 2% higher than original data from USACE

Energy Value Projections Year Generation $/MWh Peak : offpeak Summer peak $/MWh Summer offpeak $/MWh Winter peak $/MWh Winter offpeak $/MWh 2015 57.48 2.25 91.30 40.57 98.54 43.79 2016 58.83 2.21 92.67 41.92 99.85 45.16 2017 57.99 2.09 88.92 42.52 95.27 45.56 2018 57.06 2.08 87.36 41.91 93.57 44.89 2019 56.70 2.21 89.28 40.41 96.19 43.54 2020 56.71 2.35 91.99 39.07 99.75 42.37 2021 56.67 2.41 92.95 38.54 101.03 41.89 2022 56.38 2.41 92.47 38.34 100.51 41.68 2023 56.11 2.42 92.14 38.10 100.19 41.42 2024 56.03 2.45 92.50 37.79 100.70 41.14 2025 56.30 2.50 93.85 37.52 102.39 40.93 2026 56.53 2.56 95.21 37.18 104.12 40.66 2027 56.51 2.54 94.88 37.32 103.68 40.79 2028 56.50 2.47 93.64 37.93 102.02 41.32 2029 56.38 2.46 93.31 37.91 101.63 41.29 2030 56.21 2.46 92.95 37.84 101.21 41.21 2031 56.31 2.51 94.06 37.43 102.66 40.85 2032 56.25 2.57 94.98 36.89 103.92 40.36 2033 56.37 2.62 95.84 36.63 105.04 40.15 2034 56.46 2.65 96.58 36.40 105.99 39.95 2035 56.44 2.70 97.22 36.05 106.88 39.62 2036 56.27 2.71 97.16 35.83 106.86 39.41 2037 56.63 2.75 98.40 35.75 108.39 39.38 2038 57.08 2.83 100.38 35.43 110.89 39.14 2039 57.67 2.93 102.79 35.12 113.93 38.92 2040 58.28 3.04 105.44 34.70 117.30 38.60

Turbine Efficiency (%) Turbine Performance Estimates 95 New Runner Efficiency - Aeration Turned Off 90 85 80 75 70 140 154 160 173 180 65 60 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Turbine Flow (cfs)