Cross-scle coopertion enles sustinle use of common-pool resource Andrew K. Ringsmuth 1,, Steven J. Lde 1,2 nd Mj Schlüter 1 rxiv:1905.03584v1 [physics.soc-ph] 26 Mr 2019 Astrct In socil-ecologicl systems (SESs, socil nd iophysicl dynmics interct within nd etween structurl levels seprted y sptil nd temporl scles. Cross-scle interctions (CSIs re interdependences etween processes t different scles, generting ehviour unpredictle t single scles. Understnding CSIs is importnt for improving SES governnce ut they remin understudied. Theoreticl models re needed, which cpture essentil fetures while eing simple enough to yield insights into mechnisms. In stylised model, we study CSIs in two-level system of wekly intercting communities hrvesting common-pool resource. Community memers dptively conform to, or defect from, norm of socilly optiml hrvesting, enforced through socil snctioning oth within nd etween communities. Ech susystem s dynmics depend sensitively on the other despite interctions eing much weker etween susystems thn within them. When interction is purely iophysicl, stly high coopertion in one community cn cuse coopertion in the other to collpse. However, even wek socil interction cn prevent collpse of coopertion nd insted cuse collpse of defection. We identify conditions under which susystem-level coopertion produces desirle system-level outcomes. Our findings expnd evidence tht collortion is importnt for sustinly mnging shred resources, showing its importnce even when resource shring nd socil reltionships re wek. Index Terms socil-ecologicl system, coopertion, multiscle nlysis, cross-scle interctions, common-pool resource, resource mngement I. INTRODUCTION In socil-ecologicl systems (SESs, socil nd iophysicl dynmics interct within nd etween levels of orgnistion seprted y sptil nd temporl scles. The Anthropocene is chrcterised y glol chnges emerging from locl chnges in humn-environment interctions. Glol chnges in turn cuse locl impcts nd most ttempts to mnge them lso must e deployed loclly [1]. The multiscle nture of SES dynmics nd governnce mkes theoreticl chrcteristion of cross-scle dynmics importnt, to help understnd how chnges implemented t given level will propgte cross scles [2] [10]. According to hierrchy theory, when levels re seprted y scle, complex system is qusiseprle into semiindependent levels; when modelling one level, vriles t other levels my e treted s constnt oundry conditions [10], [11]. In such systems, cuses of nonliner ehviour t one level, such s threshold ehviour, must lie t the sme level. However, SESs re not seprle in this wy. If vrile t some level pproches criticl threshold, even smll perturtion from n interction with vrile t nother level my drive it over the threshold, cusing nonliner ehviour such s regime shift [10], [12], [13]. Such 1 Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.k.ringsmuth@gmil.com 2 Fenner School of Environment & Society, The Austrlin Ntionl University, Building 141, Linneus Wy, Cnerr, ACT, 2601, Austrli sensitive dependence etween processes t different scles, which genertes ehviour unpredictle from ehviour t single scles, is known s cross-scle interction (CSI [13]. Mny reserchers hve qulittively descried CSIs in SESs, conceptully [7], [10], [12], [14] [18] nd in specific cse studies (recently, [2], [19] [22]. CSIs hve een sttisticlly quntified in different systems, from dt t multiple scles. Brondizio et l [23] nlysed Amzon deforesttion dt t different length scles, showing tht understnding deforesttion trjectories requires differentiting cuses t different scles. Sornno nd collortors [4] quntified CSIs using multiscle dt nd Byesin hierrchicl sttisticl models. Applying this method to study of lke wter qulity cross different regions of North Americ, they identified scle mismtch etween qulity vrition nd wter mngement. To dte, however, there hve een few ttempts to theoreticlly model CSIs in SESs in terms of underlying mechnisms. Peters et l [9] proposed mthemticl frmework for nonliner dynmics in ctstrophic events in terms of ptternprocess reltionships, including feedcks, cross scles. They pplied this frmework to chrcterise events such s the spred of wildfires, infectious diseses nd insect outreks, finding tht strtegies for mitigting risks of such events must ccount for CSIs nd will often e counterintuitive. Recently, Lnsing nd coworkers reported [24] n gent-sed model of wter resource nd pest control mngement in Bli s ncient rice terrces, to help explin shifts from individulistic fieldlevel prctices to coopertive regionl-level prctices. Modelling gent interctions nd mngement decisions using evolutionry gme theory on sptilly emedded lttice model showed tht long-estlished sptil ptterns oservle in the rice terrces cn e creted y feedck etween frmers decisions nd the ecology of the pddies, triggering trnsition from individulistic to coopertive prctices. In the theoreticl middle ground etween generic frmeworks nd detiled cse models lies potentil for stylised, miniml models. These im to cpture essentil system fetures while eing simple enough to yield insights into mechnisms. This is helpful for guiding thought experiments relting CSIs to underlying mechnisms, nd for interpreting empiricl cse study results. Here, we develop stylised model of resource mngement y socil pressure in multilevel SES, ccounting for CSIs. Focusing on common-pool resource mngement, we extend prior work y Tvoni, Schlüter nd Levin (TSL [25], who used evolutionry gme theory to model community of gents hrvesting renewle common-pool resource s sis for economic production. Agents dptively chose whether to conform to, or defect from, norm of socilly optiml hrvesting, enforced through socil snctioning. Schlüter et l [26] extended the TSL model, using gent-sed methods to test the roustness of norm-driven coopertion to environmentl vritions. One ws the introduction of neighouring community nd resource pool, with diffusive 1
resource trnsfer etween the pools. Results showed tht stly high coopertion in one community could cuse coopertion in the other to collpse ecuse dded resource vilility due to the pools coupling incresed the pyoff for norm defectors. However, the communities did not djust their norms for dded resource vilility, nd no socil interctions etween communities were considered. We extend this nlysis of intercting SESs with two types of socil interction nd chrcterise how locl-level ehviours interct to produce outcomes t the system level. First, we consider how communiction etween communities while setting hrvesting norms cn djust the norms for dded resource vilility due to iophysicl coupling. Second, we dd ongoing socil coupling such tht normcoopertive gents cn snction defectors in oth communities. We ssume seprtion of scles etween the strengths of interctions within nd etween susystems. This enles us to quntify how nonliner chnges in susystem ehviour (ppernce or disppernce of dynmicl ttrctors rise from iophysicl nd socil CSIs etween the two susystems. We identify conditions under which susystem-level coopertion gives rise to desirle system-level outcomes, nd conditions which prevent this. The exct system model is nlyticlly insolule nd we use perturtion theory [27] to derive n pproximte model in the wek coupling (multiscle regime. This model closely pproximtes numericl solutions of the exct model. Solving our model with comintion of nlyticl nd numericl methods llows more efficient chrcteristion of the prmeter spce thn purely numericl methods, nd the derived equtions shed light on mechnisms. This dul pproch is lso sis for future development using more dvnced multiscle nlyticl methods from dynmicl systems theory nd sttisticl physics, which hve elucidted wide rnge of complex systems [28] [32]. We envisge tht, in future, comintion of mthemticl nd gent-sed stylised multiscle models my enle n effective theory of CSIs in SESs, complementing sttisticl nd qulittive nlyses from multiscle empiricl studies. This my help to guide empiricl reserchers in quntifying CSIs nd mechnisms underlying them, reveling new leverge points for governnce of rel systems. II. MODEL We consider the two-level model schemtised in figure 1, comprising two intercting socil-ecologicl susystems, ech of which, in isoltion, is descried y the TSL model [25]. In ech, community of gents hrvests commonpool resource. Ech gent dptively conforms to, or defects from, socil norm of socilly optiml hrvesting, choosing strtegy sed on resource vilility nd the utilities of strtegies chosen y other gents. The iophysicl vriles of interest re the resource stocks, nd socil vriles the norm-coopertive frctions of the susystem popultions. The two re directly coupled only within ech susystem (gents hrvest only loclly, ut the iophysicl nd socil vriles re coupled etween susystems. Socil interction etween susystems comprises two steps: first, communities my choose to shre informtion out their resources while estlishing hrvesting norms; second, coopertors ostrcise defectors to enforce the norms. System Susystem 1 Susystem 2 Replenishment Loss Biophysicl Loss Replenishment interction Common pool Resource trnsfer Common pool resource ρ(1(τ resource ρ(2(τ Coupling = δ Extrction Extrction Socil interctions Community Norm estlishment Defector ostrcism Community E*(1, c μ(1, (1(τ E*(2, c μ(2, (2(τ Coupling = λ Agent Socil Agent Agent Socil Agent interction interction c d c d c d c d Fig. 1. Model system with socil nd iophysicl interctions etween symmetricl susystems. In ech, community of gents extrcts renewle common pool resource nd ech dptively chooses etween coopertive (low nd defective (high extrction effort levels, constrined y socil norm of non-excessive hrvesting (quntified y Ec (i. Coopertors enforce the norm y ostrcising defectors. Biophysicl coupling (strength δ permits resource trnsfer etween susystems. Communities my choose to shre resource informtion while setting norms; we ssume tht this communiction is either perfect or nonexistent. Ongoing socil coupling (strength λ enles coopertors to ostrcise defectors in oth communities. A. Biophysicl dynmics We model susystem resource dynmics s the sum of locl processes nd susystem interctions. Following TSL [25], [26], the resource stock of, for exmple, susystem 1 (R (1 (t is replenished y its environment t constnt rte (c (1 nd lost t rte tht depends on the squre of the resource occuption (rtio of the stock to its mximum vlue, R (1 m, determined y limits such s the cpcity of reservoir. Resource is lso hrvested y the susystem community of n (1 gents, collectively exerting effort E (1 (t. Resource is trnsferred diffusively etween susystems such tht the rte depends linerly on the difference etween their resource occuptions. Under the comined ction of these processes, susystem 1 s resource stock chnges ccording to the firstorder, nonliner ordinry differentil eqution, ( 2 Ṙ (1 (t = c (1 d (1 R (1 (t R (1 qe (1 (tr (1 (t m ( R (2 (t + r R (2 R(1 (t m R (1. (1 m Here, d (1 is coefficient prticulr to given system nd q (the technology fctor is constnt. In rel systems, resource trnsfer coupling, r my depend on flow direction due to, for exmple, constrints of geogrphy or institutionl regultions. However, for simplicity we ssume tht r is independent of flow direction nd tht oth susystems hve equl resource cpcities, nd replenishment nd dissiption coefficients (R (i m R m, c (i c, d (i d. So tht the effects of iophysicl nd socil susystem interctions my e compred firly, we define dimensionless vriles, ρ (i = R (i /R m nd τ = (d/r m t, nd rewrite (1 s ρ (1 (τ = c d ρ(1 (τ 2 qr m d E(1 (τρ (1 (τ + r d (ρ(2 (τ ρ (1 (τ. (2 2
In given system, it my e possile to quntify how coupling strength depends on spce nd time. For exmple, if communities hrvest wter from connected odies, the mechnics of wter trnsfer etween them will depend on geogrphicl prmeters such s distnce. However, for generlity, we impose seprtion of scles etween susystemnd system-level interction strengths phenomenologiclly, y invoking wek coupling prmeter, δ r d, 0 δ 1. This llows us to tret system-level resource trnsfer s smll perturtion to susystem-level dynmics nd, therefore, using regulr perturtion theory [27], to ssume tht (2 hs solutions of the form ρ (1 (τ = ρ (1 0 (τ + δρ(1 1 (τ + δ2 ρ (1 2 (τ +... (3 Sustituting (3 into (2 nd truncting t first order in δ yields differentil equtions for the isolted susystem resource dynmics nd perturtion due to system-level resource trnsfer, respectively: ρ (1 0 (τ = c d ρ(1 0 (τ2 qr m d E(1 (τρ (1 0 (τ, (4 ρ (1 1 (τ = ρ (2 0 (τ ρ(1 0 (τ(1 + 2ρ(1 1 (τ qr m d E(1 (τρ (1 1 (τ. (4 In the supporting informtion (SI, we show tht this description very closely pproximtes the complete description (2 (see fig. S2. Perturtion theory mkes the system mthemticlly trctle nd lso links it to core concepts of socilecologicl resilience [5], which my e defined s the cpcity of SES to sor perturtions while mintining structure nd function [3], [5]. Our nlysis directly ssesses susystem resilience to cross-scle perturtions. B. Socil dynmics Totl community extrctive effort is the sum of ll coopertors nd defectors efforts. For susystem 1, ( E (1 (τ = n (1 (1 e c µ (1 + (1 µ (1 (1 (τ. (5 Here, 0 (1 (τ 1 is the popultion frction mde up of norm coopertors, who ech extrct t socilly optiml (lower effort level, e c (1, while the remining defectors exert (higher e d (1. We define µ (1 = e d (1 /e c (1. Community productivity is ssumed to tke Co-Dougls form in effort nd resource [25]: f (1 (τ = γ[e (1 (t] α [R (1 (t] β = γr β m[e (1 (τ] α [ρ (1 (τ] β, (6 where γ is the totl fctor productivity nd α, β re constnts. Pyoffs for coopertors (c nd defectors (d re [25] ( π (1 (1 f (1 (τ x (τ = e x E (1 (τ w, x = c, d, (7 where w is the cost of production. Ech defector experiences socil snctioning ( ostrcism from the coopertive frctions of oth communities, weighted y susystem popultions nd socil couplings, λ (ij : ( ω (1 (τ = s n (1 e Teg(1 (τ + λ (21 n (2 e Teg(2 (τ, (8 where s is the mximl snctioning tht n individul cn pply. We ssume symmetricl community popultions nd socil couplings (n (i n; λ (ij λ, ut note tht in rel systems they my differ for mny resons. Mechnisms underlying socil coupling re prticulr to given system. For generlity, we gin impose seprtion of scles y ssuming tht couplings re much weker etween individuls in seprte communities thn in the sme community (0 λ 1. Figure 2 plots the ostrcism experienced y defector in susystem 1 due to coopertors in oth susystems. The dependences on (1 nd (2 re oth nonliner, with threshold ehviour t (i. The curve, ω (1 = ω (1 ( (1 t (2 = 0 is identicl to tht shown in figure 2 of [25]. Although the nonliner fctors of oth terms in (8 re identiclly prmeterised, ω (1 depends more wekly on (2 thn (1 ecuse the second term is scled y the wek socil coupling. The ostrcism components from the two communities dd, producing effects not seen when ostrcism is only locl. Defectors in community i experience nonzero ostrcism even when (i is elow its threshold, provided (j (j = i is ove its threshold ( (i (j. Moreover, when coopertors dominte oth communities ( (i 0.5, defectors in ech experience higher level of ostrcism thn cn e pplied y their locl communities lone. ω (1 (τ (2 (τ (1 (τ Fig. 2. Ostrcism experienced y defectors in susystem 1 due to the coopertive frctions of the susystem 1 nd 2 popultions. Prmeters: n = 50, λ =, s = 4/n = 6.8 10 3, T = 150, g = 10. The s vlue is derived from the vlue ssumed in [25] for the mximum snctioning pplicle y the whole community, h = 4. The coopertive frction of ech susystem s popultion evolves ccording to men-field replictor dynmics [33]. For susystem 1, this is written s in [25] ut using our dimensionless vriles: (1 R m (τ = d (1 (τ(1 (1 (τ ( π d (1 (τ π c (1 (τ π d (1 (τ C. Cses for modelling coupled system (ω (1 (τ π d (1 (τ.(9 When δ = λ = 0, the originl TSL model [25] descries ech susystem. In section S-A, we summrise its fetures s enchmrk for susystem ehviour. In the sections elow, we investigte how iophysicl nd socil perturtions due to susystem couplings shift susystem fixed points, reltive to n isolted susystem, in different cses. First, we quntify how iophysicl coupling ffects ech susystem s norm of socilly optiml hrvesting when communities shre resource informtion during norm setting. Two scenrios re otined, in which norms respectively re nd re not djusted for coupling. We compute susystem 1 s iophysicl nd socil 3
fixed points for oth scenrios, in cses where coupling is purely iophysicl, purely socil, or comintion of the two. We fix coupling strengths such tht interctions etween susystems re t lest twice s wek s interctions within them (0 δ 0.5, 0 λ 0.5 nd lso fix the coopertordefector effort multiplier for susystem 2, µ (2 ritrrily t 75% of the rnge of µ vlues in n isolted susystem (µ (2 = 0.75(µ N 1 + 1 = 2.88. This is ecuse the rnge of µ depends on the iophysicl coupling strength, so vries cross the prmeter spce (see section III-A. For consistency, therefore, µ (2 is fixed reltive to the isolted cse. Prior nlysis [26] simulted the full coupled susystem dynmics for ech prmeter comintion. Initil conditions were chosen ( (2 (0 lwys 0.9, (1 (0 vried nd the system numericlly evolved to equilirium. Here, since we ssume equilirium nd nlyse the stility lndscpe, we insted fix the long-time ehviour of susystem 2 nd ignore its trnsient ehviour, which my originte nywhere in the chosen equilirium s sin of ttrction. For ech scenrio of norms nd couplings, we consider cses in which susystem 2 equilirtes t ech of its monomorphic fixed points ( (2 = 0, 1. Although the stilities of these fixed points vry cross the prmeter spce, they re lwys ccessile through n pproprite choice of initil conditions. This is not true for the mixed fixed points, which vry in oth coordintes nd stility. For ech cse, we ddress two questions: 1 is susystem 1 resilient to cross-scle perturtions from susystem 2 or do they cuse it to undergo stility phse trnsition; 2 does the long-time ehviour of susystem 2 promote or prevent similr long-time ehviour in susystem 1 nd, therefore, the overll system (oth susystems together? III. RESULTS A. Norm scenrios in coupled system In ech susystem, the effort level stisfying (S2 when the resource is t equilirium quntifies the socilly optiml hrvesting norm. To compute susystem 1 s resource equiliri, we ssume tht oth susystems zeroth- nd firstorder resource dynmics hve equilirted. Setting ρ (1 1 (τ = ρ (2 1 (τ = 0 yields ρ (1 1 = = d(ρ (2 0 (1 ρ 0 R m E (1 + 2dρ (1 (10 0 R m (E (1 E (2 S(E (1 + S(E (2 2S(E (1. (10 When multiplied y δ, this gives the shift in susystem 1 s resource equilirium due to trnsfer etween susystems (reltive to ρ (1 0. Sustituting (10 nd (S1 into (3 gives ρ (1 ρ (1 (1 0 + δρ 1 1 ( 2S(E (1 4cd + R m E (1 (R m E (1 S(E (1 d + δd(r m (E (1 E (2 S(E (1 + S(E (2. (11 Empiricl studies hve shown tht communiction leding to norm-sed collortion etween common pool resource hrvesters cn strongly improve resource sustinility compred with cses of no communiction [6]. We consider two scenrios for norm setting, clled uncollortive nd collortive. In the former, communities set norms without communicting, s if the susystems were isolted (Ec E c0 = 83 nd E N E N0 = 1.83; µ N = E N0 /E c0 µ N 0 = 3.78, s clculted in section S-A. In the collortive scenrio, communities perfectly communicte nd set norms using resource informtion from oth susystems. Sustituting (11 into (6, nd the result into (S2 nd (S2, gives shifted Ec nd E N vlues. Numericlly solving for these vlues cross the wek coupling rnge (0 δ 0.5 yields distriutions tht re very well pproximted y liner fits from lest-squres regression (Person correltion, r > 0.999 for oth: E c (δ = E c 0 + 7.70 10 2 δ µ N (δ = µ N 0 5.56 10 1 δ. (12 In the collortive scenrio, these shifts must e included in oth ρ (i 0 nd ρ(i 1 to clculte ρ(i. B. Purely iophysicl coupling We first study cses in which 0 < δ 0.5, λ = 0. Evluting (10 determines shifts in iophysicl equiliri cross the prmeter spce (see fig. S3. As (10 mkes cler, ρ (1 1 vries in proportion to the difference in zeroth-order resource equiliri; when ρ (1 (2 0 is higher thn ρ 0, the firstorder dynmics trnsfer resource from susystem 1 to 2, nd conversely. In turn, this difference depends on the socil fixed point t which susystem 2 is ssumed to equilirte. When (2 = 0 (fig. S3,, susystem 2 is purely defective, the corresponding high level of extrctive effort results in lower ρ (2 0, nd the equilirium first-order dynmics persistently trnsfer resource from susystem 1 to 2. Conversely, when (2 = 1 (fig. S3c, d, the correspondingly low extrctive effort gives higher ρ (2 0 nd the first-order equilirium persistently trnsfers resource from susystem 2 to 1. Solving (9 when (1 = 0 yields monomorphic socil fixed points t (1 = 0, 1, nd shifted mixed socil fixed points on loci generlly defined y ω (1 ( (1, (2 = π (1 d (e c, µ (1, (1, ρ (1. More explicitly, hn (e Teg(1 + λe Teg(2 (13 [ = e c µ (γ (1 E (1] [ α 1 R m 2Q(E (1 ( ( δ 2(E (1 E (2 Q(E (1 + Q(E (2 + 2Q(E (1 (Q(E (1 2E (1] β w, where Q(E (i = 1 + 4E (i2. Figure S4 plots ω (1 ( (1, (2 nd π (1 d (e c, µ (1, (1, ρ (1, with curve intersections corresponding to mixed socil fixed points ecuse (1 (τ = 0 when ω (1 (τ = π (1 d (τ in (9; the ostrcism nd defector pyoff lnce. Figure 3 shows shifted iophysicl nd socil fixed points in susystem 1 under purely iophysicl susystem coupling. Results re shown for the upper ound of the wek coupling rnge (δ = 0.5, which we cll moderte coupling, for oth norm scenrios, when susystem 2 hs equilirted t its purely coopertive socil equilirium ( (2 = 1. When 4
(2 = 0 insted, susystem 1 shows qulittively similr ehviour to n isolted susystem nd is therefore resilient to the cross-scle iophysicl perturtion (see fig. S7. However, figure 3i shows stility phse trnsition; when µ(1 & 2.9, there re no mixed socil fixed points ecuse defector pyoff exceeds ostrcism for ll vlues of (1 (see fig. S4. Intuitively, this is ecuse iophysicl coupling gives susystem 1 gents ccess to extr resource from susystem 2, incresing their defector pyoff, while without socil coupling, susystem 2 cnnot provide extr ostrcism to lnce this pyoff. Only the purely defective fixed point is stle in this region, so for ny (1 (0 < 1, collpse of coopertion is inevitle. This constitutes CSI, since the wek perturtion from system-level dynmics genertes phse trnsition in susystem 1, from multistle to monostle ehviour, nd this cnnot e predicted y nlysing either susystem in isoltion. This is consistent with [26], in which this shift ws descried using gent-sed methods1. Notly, coopertion never collpses in the collortive norm scenrio; operting under norm set with the enefit of communiction etween susystems preserves coopertion where it otherwise fils. Moreover, under oth susystem 2 equiliri ((2 = 0, 1, the C equilirium in susystem 1 is more coopertive, for given µ(1 vlue, in the collortive scenrio. i Uncollortive * (2 = 1 Collpse of coopertion μ(1 i (1 5 μ(1 We now consider cses in which 0 < λ 0.5 nd δ = 0. Although one my question why communities tht do not shre resources would snction ech other for violting resource use norms, it is instructive to study such cses efore comining socil nd iophysicl coupling. When δ = 0, (1 (3 reduces to ρ(1 (τ = ρ0 (τ, so the resource equilirtes s in n isolted susystem nd the uncollortive nd collortive scenrios re identicl. Moreover, the mixed socil fixed points re independent of µ(2 when δ = 0 in (13. Figure S5 shows the intersections of ω (1 ((1, (2 (1 nd πd (ec, µ(1, (1, ρ(1 (the mixed socil fixed points for purely socil coupling. Figure 3 shows how moderte purely socil coupling (λ = 0.5, δ = 0 shifts system 1 s fixed points for ech of susystem 2 s monomorphic socil equiliri. When (2 = 0, susystem 1 s ehviour is qulittively similr to n isolted susystem nd is therefore resilient to the cross-scle socil perturtion. However, when (2 = 1, susystem 1 undergoes stility phse trnsition. There is mixed socil equilirium with strong defector mjority for µ(1. 2.6. For µ(1 & 2.9, there is single mixed socil equilirium with strong coopertor mjority. In the intervening region (2.6. µ(1. 2.9, ostrcism exceeds defector pyoff for ll vlues of (1 nd only the purely coopertive fixed point is stle. Intuitively, this is ecuse socil coupling exposes susystem 1 defectors to dditionl ostrcism from susystem 2 coopertors, while the sence of iophysicl coupling prevents susystem 2 from incresing the susystem 1 defector pyoff through dded resource vilility. In this region, collpse of defection is inevitle in susystem 1 for ny (1 (0 > 0. We see tht the wek perturtion provided y socil coupling etween susystems cn produce two C. Purely socil coupling 0.0 (1 * ii (2 = 1 0.15 0.0 δ = 0.0 λ = 0.5 * (2 = 0 0.15 5 ii Collortive (2 = 1 5 0.0 μ(2= 2.88 δ = 0.5 λ = 0.0 (1 D 5 Collpse of defection 0.0 (1 Fig. 3.. Shifted iophysicl (lue, purple nd socil (ornge fixed points in susystem 1 under purely iophysicl, moderte (δ = 0.5 susystem coupling. Results shown for the purely coopertive socil equilirium in susystem 2 ((2 = 1, in the uncollortive (pnel i nd collortive (ii norm scenrios. Dshed nd solid ornge loci respectively comprise unstle nd stle socil fixed points. Defector pyoff overwhelms ostrcism in the red region in pnel i.. Shifted susystem 1 fixed points under purely socil, moderte (λ = 0.5 susystem coupling. Results shown for the purely defective (pnel i nd purely coopertive (ii socil equilirium in susystem 2 ((2 = 0, 1 respectively. Ostrcism overwhelms defector pyoff in the green region in pnel ii. - mixed, defector The previously unseen socil ttrctor is lelled: D dominted. kinds of stility phse trnsitions t the susystem level, from multistle to monostle phse nd etween two different multistle phses. D. Comined iophysicl nd socil coupling Finlly, we study interply etween wek iophysicl nd socil couplings ( 0 < δ 0.5, 0 < λ 0.5. This represents scenrio in which two communities with wek socil reltionship wekly shre common pool resource nd enforce socil norms within nd etween communi ties. Figure S6 shows the intersections of ω (1 ((1, (2 (1 (1 (1 (1 nd πd (ec, µ,, ρ (the mixed socil fixed points for eqully moderte iophysicl nd socil couplings (δ = λ = 0.5. Figure 4 plots vritions in susystem 1 s fixed points for susystem 2 s purely coopertive socil equili rium ((2 = 1. The collpse of susystem 1 coopertion seen with purely iophysicl coupling in the uncollortive scenrio (fig. 3i is prevented. Moreover, within smll prmeter rnges (2.9. µ(1. 3 in pnel i nd. µ(1. 3 in ii, defection collpses insted. This shows tht when iophysicl nd socil coupling re eqully moderte, nd susystem 2 equilirtes in fully coopertive stte, dded 1 Due to smll differences in model formultion, δ in [26] (introduced in eqution (4.1 is equl to one qurter of δ here. e.g. δ = 0.5 here is equivlent to δ = 0.125 in [26]. 5
ostrcism experienced y susystem 1 defectors overwhelms extr pyoff ville due to dded resource ccess. The net result is stility phse trnsition for susystem 1, which does not occur without socil coupling. Importntly, the long-time results of socil interctions etween susystems overwhelm the effects of their iophysicl interctions even when socil nd iophysicl couplings re equl in strength. 0 μ (1 Socil coupling (λ i Uncollortive (2 = 1 δ = 0.5 λ = 0.5 μ (2 = 2.88 0.0 0.0 (1 (1 (1 (2 (2 μ = 2.9, μ = 2.88, * = 1 i Uncollortive Collortive ii C DC C Collortive (2 = 1 * * 5 Collpse of defection DC D DC Biophysicl coupling (δ 5 Collpse of defection DC DC DC Biophysicl coupling (δ Fig. 4.. Shifted iophysicl (lue, purple nd socil (ornge fixed points in susystem 1 under comined iophysicl nd socil susystem coupling. Results shown for eqully moderte couplings (δ = λ = 0.5, for the purely coopertive socil equilirium in susystem 2 ( (2 = 1. Ostrcism overwhelms defector pyoff in the green regions.. Phse plots showing how susystem 1 socil stility phse depends on socil nd iophysicl coupling strengths, when µ (1 = 2.9, µ (2 = 2.88, (2 = 1. Results shown for 500 vlues, ech, of δ nd λ ( 10 5 comintions per plot. Five stility phses re lelled, ech comprising lndscpe with either one or two of the four socil ttrctor types descried. The phse structure vries significntly cross the (µ (1, µ (2, (2 prmeter spce; vlues chosen here provide n illustrtive exmple. i. Uncollortive scenrio, contining five phses. The D phse ppers only in smll region t the lower right of pnel (δ 7 nd is mgnified in the inset. ii. Collortive scenrio, contining four phses. The results revel importnt differences etween norm scenrios. Susystem coopertivities re much more mutully sensitive in the uncollortive scenrio. Wek perturtions from susystem 2 cn cuse opposing types of socil stility phse trnsitions in susystem 1; collpse of coopertion when coupling is purely iophysicl nd collpse of defection when socil coupling is present. Conversely, in the collortive scenrio, susystems do not risk collpse of coopertion due to perturtions from wek iophysicl coupling. Socil coupling cn cuse collpse of defection lso in this cse, however. Furthermore, susystem 1 s C equilirium is more coopertive in the collortive scenrio, s previously seen ii for purely iophysicl coupling. Figure 4 shows how susystem 1 s socil stility lndscpe depends on socil nd iophysicl coupling strengths cross the wek-coupling prmeter suspce. Five stility phses re lelled, ech with different comintion of socil ttrctors. There is cler symmetry etween how socil coupling nd iophysicl coupling determine the stility phse. Wheres chnges in socil coupling strength cuse phse trnsitions for every vlue of iophysicl coupling in oth scenrios, the inverse is not true; for most socil coupling vlues, no chnge in iophysicl coupling cuses phse trnsition. Pnel i shows phse plot for the uncollortive scenrio. The collpse of coopertion seen in figure 3 is restricted to smll prmeter region t the lower right corner. At the opposite extreme, where socil coupling is moderte, lies the purely coopertive phse nd this extends cross the rnge of wek iophysicl couplings. The spectrum of other stility phses lie etween these extremes. In section S-D, we riefly descrie mechnisms underlying the ehviour of ech phse. The overll trend is tht incresing the socil coupling cuses successive phse trnsitions in the susystem 1 stility lndscpe, grdully incresing its coopertivity. The collortive scenrio (fig. 4ii shows the sme rod fetures except tht the D phse is sent, for resons explined in section III-C. Additionlly, wheres the phse oundries increse monotoniclly with iophysicl coupling in the uncollortive scenrio, they decrese monotoniclly in the collortive scenrio. Thus, for given level of resource shring, communiction during norm setting will llow lower levels of socil coupling to cuse stility phse trnsitions in susystem 1. Collortive norm setting is therefore n investment which cn lter increse the power of socil pressure s resource-sustining mechnism. In sum, the results show the importnce of collortion etween communities, oth in estlishing norms nd enforcing those norms through socil snctioning, even when iophysicl nd socil coupling re much weker etween susystems thn within ech. IV. DISCUSSION Our results show tht socil nd iophysicl CSIs cn profoundly ffect how intercting communities mnge common pool resource, nd how their susystem-level ehviours interct to produce system-level outcomes. Even wek socil interctions etween communities cn produce long-time ehviour significntly more coopertive thn tht which eventutes in their sence. This is importnt for governnce ecuse it revels mechnism y which resource mngers cn help to ensure tht susystem-level efforts produce desired system-level outcomes. When coupling is purely iophysicl nd t lest moderte in strength (δ 0.5, nd norms re estlished without communiction, pursuing socilly optiml resource use is effectively zero-sum gme etween communities. In this perverse sitution, desire for system-level sustinility expressed through efforts t the susystem level is self-defeting; success for the susystem gurntees filure for the system. However, enforcing norms etween communities resolves this ecuse incresed coopertion in one community encourges coopertion in the other, llowing them to cooperte s whole communities. This system-level coopertion depends strongly on the socil coupling strength, even within the wek rnge. Strengthening 6
the coupling produces successively higher levels of coopertion through trnsitions etween stility phses (fig. 4. Moreover, communities tht shre informtion during norm setting protect themselves ginst collpse of coopertion t the susystem level, nd increse the power of intercommunity socil pressure to increse coopertion t the system level. Methodologiclly, our dul nlyticl/numericl pproch offers powerful complement to purely numericl, gentsed methods [26]. In the dul pproch, finding nlyticl expressions for susystem fixed points enles their direct evlution, circumventing the need for full dynmicl simultion nd drsticlly ccelerting chrcteristion of the stility lndscpe cross the prmeter spce. However, this comes t the cost of sttisticl ehviour outside the men field, which is preserved y gent-sed methods. There is lso smll ccurcy cost incurred y the perturtive iophysicl model (see section S-B, though this cn in principle e reduced y truncting (3 t higher order, notwithstnding ssocited increses in mthemticl difficulty. In ddition to efficiently chrcterising two-level system, our dul pproch is well suited to future study of lrger systems, including more susystem interction mechnisms nd/or more hierrchicl levels. Powerful methods hve een developed within the theory of dynmicl systems nd sttisticl physics, for nlysing interply etween structure nd dynmics t different scles in mny-ody systems. Singulr perturtion theory [30] nd renormlistion [29], for exmple, were first developed s refinements to the regulr perturtion theory on which our iophysicl model (4, 4 is sed. Renormlistion theory ws refined into technique for corse-grining the sttisticl description of systems with mny length nd time scles, concisely explining reltionships etween ehviour t different scles. This hs provided deep insight into criticl trnsitions in vriety of systems. Although it is cknowledged tht dynmicl systems methods re useful for modelling SESs, nd tht there is need to etter understnd the multiscle ehviour of SESs nd how this reltes to their criticl trnsitions, such multiscle methods hve yet to e pplied in this field. The formlism developed here is nturlly suited to extension through such methods, which we suggest for future reserch. We foresee complementry roles for dul nlyticl/numericl dynmicl systems methods nd gentsed simultion, with the ltter providing computtionl lortory in which to test the former in smll prototypic systems efore ppliction to systems imprcticlly lrge for full simultion. Even efore extending the model to lrger systems, there re mny options for refinement. One is to modify the socil interction model y pplying results from psychology. Reserch on in-group is suggests tht memers of community (in-group re likely to snction memers of nother community (out-group more hrshly thn in-group memers for norm violtion [35]. This could e incorported into our model s dependence of the prmeters controlling the curvture nd mximum of the ostrcism experienced y out-group defectors (h, T nd g in the second term of (8 on the socil coupling etween communities (λ. Furthermore, psychologicl limits to humn socil network size nd structure [36] could e incorported y limiting the socil connectedness ville to ech gent nd, therefore, their cpcity to ostrcise nd e ostrcised y others. Other interesting results my come from reking the prmetric symmetries ssumed to exist etween susystems in this study. Ultimtely, more relistic representtions of SESs will come from using refined susystem model s uilding lock in lrger, multilevel, multiscle systems with prmeteristions sttisticlly distriuted cross susystems. The multiscle nlysis methods descried ove re well suited to such system. Used in comintion with sttisticl nd qulittive nlyses from multiscle empiricl studies, such modelling methods offer strong potentil for etter understnding nd mnging CSIs in SESs. Our work rises fundmentl questions out wht is ment y scle in SESs, nd how est to model it. Different usge of the term cross nturl nd socil sciences influencing SES reserch hs produced tension in the literture [7], [10], which must e nvigted if coherent theory of CSIs is to e developed. Nturl sciences usully define scles s orders of mgnitude in sptil nd temporl seprtions. Socil sciences typiclly define scles s levels of orgnistion in hierrchicl socil systems, though there hs lso een interest in how sptil emeddedness ffects socil systems [37] [39]. In modelling studies, CSIs re commonly posed s interctions etween quntities which vry over different sptil nd temporl scles ut precisely how such interctions depend on spce nd time is often not considered. In this study, we considered interctions cross scles in the strengths of iophysicl nd socil couplings within nd etween susystems. One possiility for interpreting our results in terms of conventionl sptiotemporl frming of CSIs is to determine how iophysicl nd socil couplings depend on spce nd time. However, given the vst rnge of resource pool types nd socil systems which my e studied, this is nontrivil undertking. Intuitively, one my expect coupling strengths to vry inversely with sptiotemporl seprtion nd this my indeed e the cse in some systems. However, in glolised, digitlly connected world, couplings cn depend counterintuitively on, or e effectively independent from, sptiotemporl seprtions, s is the cse for so-clled teleconnections [17]. Recent work on socil-ecologicl network nlysis [40] [42] hs egun to quntify how the sptiotemporl emeddedness of socil nd iophysicl dynmics ffects SES resilience. We propose tht further reserch in this direction, cross rod rnge of systems nd contexts, my e n importnt step towrds more generl nd rodly pplicle theory of CSIs. V. AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS All uthors jointly designed the reserch. AKR developed the nlysis nd interpreted the results under dvice from SJL nd MS. AKR wrote, nd SJL nd MS criticlly revised, the mnuscript. All uthors gve finl pprovl for puliction. VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AKR thnks Alessndro Tvoni, Sonj Rdosvljevic nd Supriy Krishnmurthy for helpful discussions. VII. FUNDING This project received funding from the Europen Reserch Council (ERC under the Europen Unions Horizon 2020 reserch nd innovtion progrmme (grnt greement No 7
682472 MUSES, nd Swedish Reserch Council Forms project grnt 2014-589. REFERENCES [1] P. H. Verurg, J. A. Dering, J. G. Dyke, S. v. d. Leeuw, S. Seitzinger, W. Steffen, nd J. Syvitski, Methods nd pproches to modelling the Anthropocene, Glol Environmentl Chnge, vol. 39, pp. 328 340, 2016. [2] S. A. McGuire nd T. J. Ehlinger, Anlysis of socil-ecologicl dynmics driving conflict in linked surfce-groundwter systems, Ecology nd Society, vol. 23, no. 4, 2018. [3] B. C. Chffin nd L. H. Gunderson, Emergence, institutionliztion nd renewl: Rhythms of dptive governnce in complex socil-ecologicl systems, Journl of Environmentl Mngement, vol. 165, pp. 81 87, 2016. [4] P. A. Sornno, K. S. Cheruvelil, E. G. Bissell, M. T. Bremign, J. A. Downing, C. E. Fergus, C. T. Filstrup, E. N. Henry, N. R. Lottig, E. H. Stnley, C. A. Stow, P.-N. Tn, T. Wgner, nd K. E. Wester, Cross-scle interctions: quntifying multi-scled cuse-effect reltionships in mcrosystems, Frontiers in Ecology nd the Environment, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 65 73, 2014. [5] C. Folke, S. R. Crpenter, B. Wlker, M. Scheffer, T. Chpin, nd J. Rockström, Resilience Thinking: Integrting Resilience, Adptility nd Trnsformility, Ecology nd Society, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010. [6] E. Ostrom, A generl frmework for nlyzing sustinility of socil-ecologicl systems, Science, 2009. [7] D. Csh, W. N. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Grden, L. Leel, P. Olsson, L. Pritchrd, nd O. Young, Scle nd cross-scle dynmics: governnce nd informtion in multilevel world, Ecology nd society, vol. 11, no. 2, 2006. [8] C. Folke, T. Hhn, P. Olsson, nd J. Norerg, Adptive governnce of socil-ecologicl systems, Annul Review of Environment nd Resources, vol. 30, no. 1, 2005. [9] D. P. C. Peters, R. A. Pielke, B. T. Bestelmeyer, C. D. Allen, S. Munson-McGee, nd K. M. Hvstd, Cross-scle interctions, nonlinerities, nd forecsting ctstrophic events, Proceedings of the Ntionl Acdemy of Sciences, vol. 101, pp. 15 130 15 135, 2004. [10] C. C. Gison, E. Ostrom, nd T.-K. Ahn, The concept of scle nd the humn dimensions of glol chnge: survey, Ecologicl economics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 217 239, 2000. [11] M. Gimpietro, Using hierrchy theory to explore the concept of sustinle development, Futures, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 616 625, 1994. [12] B. H. Wlker, S. R. Crpenter, J. Rockström, A.-S. Crépin, nd G. D. Peterson, Drivers, Slow Vriles, Fst Vriles, Shocks, nd Resilience, Ecology nd Society, vol. 17, no. 3, p. rt30, 2012. [13] D. P. C. Peters, B. T. Bestelmeyer, nd M. G. Turner, Cross- Scle Interctions nd Chnging Pttern-Process Reltionships: Consequences for System Dynmics, Ecosystems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 790 796, 2007. [14] F. Isell, A. Gonzlez, M. Loreu, J. Cowles, S. Díz, A. Hector, G. M. Mce, D. A. Wrdle, M. I. O Connor, J. E. Duffy, L. A. Turnull, P. L. Thompson, nd A. Lriguderie, Linking the influence nd dependence of people on iodiversity cross scles, Nture, vol. 546, no. 7656, pp. 65 72, 2017. [15] G. S. Cumming, C. R. Allen, N. C. Bn, D. Biggs, H. C. Biggs, D. H. M. Cumming, A. De Vos, G. Epstein, M. Etienne, K. Mciejewski, R. Mthevet, C. Moore, M. Nendovic, nd M. Schoon, Understnding protected re resilience: multi-scle, socilecologicl pproch, Ecologicl Applictions, vol. 25, 2015. [16] K. Mciejewski, A. De Vos, G. S. Cumming, C. Moore, nd D. Biggs, Cross-scle feedcks nd scle mismtches s influences on culturl services nd the resilience of protected res, Ecologicl Applictions, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 11 23, 2015. [17] R. Scholes, B. Reyers, R. Biggs, M. Spierenurg, nd A. Duripph, Multi-scle nd cross-scle ssessments of socil-ecologicl systems nd their ecosystem services, Current Opinion in Environmentl Sustinility, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16 25, 2013. [18] E. S. Brondizio, E. Ostrom, nd O. R. Young, Connectivity nd the Governnce of Multilevel Socil-Ecologicl Systems: The Role of Socil Cpitl, Annul Review of Environment nd Resources, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 253 278, 2009. [19] S. Niirnen, A. Richter, T. Blenckner, L. Stige, M. Vlmn, nd A.-M. Eikeset, Glol connectivity nd cross-scle interctions crete uncertinty for Blue Growth of Arctic fisheries, Mrine Policy, vol. 87, pp. 321 330, 2018. [20] A. De Vos, G. Cumming, nd D. Roux, The relevnce of crossscle connections nd sptil interctions for ecosystem service delivery y protected res: Insights from southern Afric, Ecosystem Services, vol. 28, pp. 133 139, 2017. [21] M. Cox, Applying Socil-Ecologicl System Frmework to the Study of the Tos Vlley Irrigtion System, Humn Ecology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 311 324, 2014. [22] T. Heikkil, E. Schlger, nd M. W. Dvis, The Role of Cross- Scle Institutionl Linkges in Common Pool Resource Mngement: Assessing Interstte River Compcts, Policy Studies Journl, vol. 39, no. 1, 2011. [23] E. S. Brondizio nd E. F. Morn, Level-dependent deforesttion trjectories in the Brzilin Amzon from 1970 to 2001, Popultion nd Environment, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 69 85, 2012. [24] J. S. Lnsing, S. Thurner, N. N. Chung, A. Coudurier-Curveur, C. Krks, K. A. Fesenmyer, nd L. Y. Chew, Adptive selforgniztion of Bli s ncient rice terrces, Proceedings of the Ntionl Acdemy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 25, pp. 6504 6509, 2017. [25] A. Tvoni, M. Schlüter, nd S. Levin, The survivl of the conformist Socil pressure nd renewle resource mngement, Journl of Theoreticl Biology, vol. 299, no. C, pp. 152 161, 2012. [26] M. Schlüter, A. Tvoni, nd S. Levin, Roustness of normdriven coopertion in the commons, Proceedings of the Royl Society B: Biologicl Sciences, vol. 283, no. 1822, p. 20152431, 2016. [27] B. K. Shivmoggi, Perturtion methods for differentil equtions. Birkhäuser, 2003. [28] P. Attrd, Non-equilirium Thermodynmics nd Sttisticl Mechnics: Foundtions nd Applictions. OUP Oxford, 2012. [29] W. McCom, Renormliztion Methods: A Guide For Beginners. OUP Oxford, 2007. [30] J. Kevorkin nd J. Cole, Multiple Scle nd Singulr Perturtion Methods. Springer New York, 2012. [31] M. Pesenson nd H. Schuster, Multiscle Anlysis nd Nonliner Dynmics: From Genes to the Brin, ser. Annul Reviews of Nonliner Dynmics nd Complexity (VCH. Wiley, 2013. [32] G. Longo nd M. Montévil, Perspectives on Orgnisms: Biologicl time, Symmetries nd Singulrities, ser. Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis. Springer Berlin Heidelerg, 2013. [33] J. Hofuer nd K. Sigmund, Evolutionry Gmes nd Popultion Dynmics. Cmridge University Press, 1998. [34] P. Dsgupt nd G. Hel, Economic Theory nd Exhustile Resources, ser. Cmridge economic hndooks. J. Niset, 1979. [35] K. McAuliffe nd Y. Dunhm, Group is in coopertive norm enforcement, Philosophicl Trnsctions of the Royl Society B: Biologicl Sciences, vol. 371, no. 1686, p. 20150073, 2016. [36] A. Sutcliffe, R. Dunr, J. Binder, nd H. Arrow, Reltionships nd the socil rin: Integrting psychologicl nd evolutionry perspectives: Reltionships nd the socil rin, British Journl of Psychology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 149 168, 2012. [37] J. R. Logn, Mking Plce for Spce: Sptil Thinking in Socil Science, Annul Review of Sociology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 507 524, 2012. [38] C. T. Butts, R. M. Acton, J. R. Hipp, nd N. N. Ngle, Geogrphicl vriility nd network structure, Socil Networks, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 82 100, 2012. [39] G. Drgnov, P. Pttison, J. Koskinen, B. Mitchell, A. Bill, M. Wtts, nd S. Bum, Networks nd geogrphy: Modelling community network structures s the outcome of oth sptil nd network processes, Socil Networks, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 6 17, 2012. [40] J. S. Syles nd J. A. Bggio, Socil-ecologicl network nlysis of scle mismtches in estury wtershed restortion, Proceedings of the Ntionl Acdemy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. E1776 E1785, 2017. [41] J. A. Bggio, S. B. BurnSilver, A. Arens, J. S. Mgdnz, G. P. Kofins, nd M. De Domenico, Multiplex socil ecologicl network nlysis revels how socil chnges ffect community roustness more thn resource depletion, Proceedings of the Ntionl Acdemy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 48, pp. 13 708 13 713, 2016. 8
[42] O. Bodin nd M. Tengö, Disentngling intngile socilecologicl systems, Glol Environmentl Chnge, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 430 439, 2012. 9
S. SUPPORTING INFORMATION A. Isolted susystem: originl TSL model When δ = λ = 0, the originl TSL model [25] descries ech susystem. Dropping lels for revity, we summrise its fetures s enchmrk for ssessing effects of perturtions due to iophysicl nd socil couplings in the coupled system. TSL clculted iophysicl nd socil fixed points for rnge of initil socil conditions, (0 nd prmeters, µ. Setting ρ(τ = 0, (4 gives iophysicl fixed points s function of totl community effort: ρ0 = q 2d ( E R m + S(E, (S1 where S(E = 4cd + E 2 R 2 m nd sterisks denote fixedpoint vlues. Sustitution into (6 gives socilly optiml (coopertive nd individully optiml (Nsh effort levels (Ec, E N, conditions for which re [34] respectively w = w = d f de nd (S2 f E 1 ( f n E d f de. (S2 It is ssumed tht 1 < µ µ N, where µ N = E N /E c. Using prmeters from [25] (n = 50, q = 1, c = 50, d = 50, R m = 200, α =, β =, γ = 10 gives Ec = 83, E N = 1.83 nd corresponding resource fixed points ρ0 c = 25, ρ0 N = 0.134. Socilly optiml nd Nsh efforts for individul gents re e c = Ec /n = 9.65 10 3 nd e N = E N /n = 3.65 10 2. The former quntifies the norm of socilly optiml hrvesting. It is ssumed tht e c < e d e N, so 1 < µ 3.78, since e N /e c µ N = 3.78. Setting (τ = 0 in (9 yields monomorphic socil fixed points ( = 0, 1 nd mixed socil fixed points on loci descried y ω( = π d (e c, µ,, ρ0. μ 0.15 D 5 0.0 Fig. S1. Socil ( ornge nd iophysicl (ρ lue fixed points of n isolted TSL susystem, prmeterised y coopertive popultion frction ((τ nd defector-coopertor effort multiplier (µ. Dshed nd solid ornge loci respectively comprise unstle socil fixed points nd stle socil fixed points (equiliri. The equiliri re lelled y type: D- purely defective, C- purely coopertive, C- mixed, coopertor dominted. Prmeters: s = 6.8 10 3, T = 150, g = 10. See figure 3 in [25] for more informtion. Figure S1 overlys these on corresponding iophysicl fixed points (S1. The stle fixed points (equiliri re ttrctors towrd which the system evolves. The µ prmeter spce is divided into two socil stility phses (qulittively different stility lndscpes, ech persisting cross some C C prmeter rnge 2, chrcterised y different comintions of ttrctors. When µ, there re two socil ttrctors, one purely defective ( = 0 nd one mixed nd coopertordominted (0.5 < < 1. We lel these ttrctor types, respectively, D nd C. When µ, D nd purely coopertive ttrctor (C; = 1 re present. B. Assessment of perturtive pproximtion We pproximte the iophysicl dynmics in the coupled susystem model (2 with perturtion expnsion (3, truncted t first order. Here we ssess this pproximtion y compring it with the full numericl solution of the menfield replictor dynmics (2. Figure S2 compres oth the trnsient dynmics nd equiliri for rnge of coupling strengths. In ech cse, clcultions were run until the system converged sufficiently close to equilirium tht the following condition ws met: ρ (1 (τ + ρ (2 (τ + (1 (τ + (2 (τ < Γ, (S3 where Γ is tolernce which we set to Γ = 10 5, since this gve good lnce etween ccurcy nd prcticlity. We lel the lowest time t which (S3 is stisfied τ eq, nd define the reltive error in the resource equilirium otined from the perturtive pproximtion, ρ (1 = ρ(1 0 (τ eq + δρ (1 1 (τ eq ρ (1 (τ eq ρ (1, (S4 (τ eq where ρ (1 (τ eq is the numericl solution of the full resource dynmics (2. Similrly, we define the reltive error in the equilirium coopertive frction of the susystem 1 popultion, (1 = (1 p (τ eq (1 (τ eq (1, (S5 (τ eq where (1 p (τ eq is the coopertive frction otined when the perturtive pproximtion is used for the resource dynmics nd (1 (τ eq is the full numericl solution. These reltive errors re ssessed for ech cse in figure S2. The results show excellent greement etween the perturtive nd full solutions in the cses of very wek ( ρ (1 = 1.2 10 4, (1 = 7.9 10 4 nd wek coupling ( ρ (1 = 4.9 10 3, (1 = 1.1 10 2. Surprisingly, even though the strong coupling cse (pnel c violtes the wek coupling ssumption underpinning our perturtive tretment (0 < δ 1, the reltive errors in equilirium resource nd coopertive popultion levels re oth only 2% in this cse. Although this vries cross the prmeter spce, we found comprly smll errors cross wide rnge of prmeter vlues, suggesting tht the perturtive tretment is more roust under strong iophysicl coupling thn might e expected. We leve elucidtion of the resons for this unexpected roustness to future work. 2 A fmilir exmple of phses comes from thermodynmics, in which sustnces such s wter show the phses, solid, liquid nd gs cross different rnges of temperture nd pressure. S1