Procedures for No-Rise Certification For Proposed Developments in the Regulatory Floodway



Similar documents
Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road Atlanta, GA 30341

UNIT 5: THE NFIP FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

Criteria for Appeals of Flood Insurance Rate Maps

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

EXISTING STRUCTURES 1) FAIR MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURE(s) BEFORE IMPROVEMENT: 2) COST OF IMPROVEMENTS:

How To Build A Floodproofed Basement

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

How to Read a Flood Insurance Rate Map Tutorial. Developed September 2000 Updated June 2003

OWNERS NAME PHONE OWNERS ADDRESS APPLICANTS NAME PHONE APPLICANTS ADDRESS

CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION US-34A and US-34D PERMANENT FLOOD REPAIRS

Lincoln County Floodplain Development Permit Application

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

University of MT Helena College of Technology Helena, MT July 21, Image Courtesy Watershed Sciences, Inc.

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: October 15, Special Provisions for Construction in Special Flood Hazard Areas

Frequently-Asked Questions about Floodplains and Flood Insurance FLOOD INSURANCE

CHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A. Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow

UNION COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

CHAPTER IV PREVENTING INCREASED DAMAGES

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS 2013 MODEL REGUATIONS September 3, 2013 version Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation

Sample DEQ Plan Submitter s Checklist for Stormwater Management Plans

Environmental Data Management Programs

AUTOMATION OF FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Appendix 4-C. Open Channel Theory

Quality Assurance Reviews of Hydraulic Models Developed for the Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation Program

Teller County, Colorado Floodplain Development Permit Application

rescue and relief efforts in the aftermath of flooding, (iii) repair of flood damaged public facilities and utilities, and

A Flood Warning System for City of Findlay, Ohio

FEMA Elevation Certificate

Using GIS Data With HEC-RAS

Developed by: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Flood Mitigation Program

MAP TYPES FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP MAP READING & FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES. FHBM Flood Hazard Boundary Map. FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map

ARTICLE 12 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION

NYSDEC Optional Additional Language Model Local Law for Flood Damage Prevention Optional Additional Language

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM TRANSITION TO NAVD 88. Elmer C Knoderer, P. E. Dewberry & Davis 8401 Arlington Boulevard Fairfax, VA

CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

DRAFT Map Modernization Plan for The State of Ohio. Prepared by The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Columbus, Ohio

Section 5 Floodplain Management Tools

FEMA Updates Flood Plain Information For 2006

HEC-RAS. River Analysis System. Applications Guide. Version 4.1 January US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center CPD-70

SECTION 15 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

Experiment (13): Flow channel

Madison Preliminary Flood Map Open House Community Meeting

OKANOGAN COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION

Prepared by. Drew Davidge

FLOOD HAZARD MANAGEMENT SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDELINES

Permit Application No. Development Address. Legal Description. A. Flood Plain and Floodway Information and Sources: (To be completed with Staff)

How To Fix A Flood Control System In South Lakewood

Farnsworth House Flood Risk and Conceptual Mitigation Evaluation River Road Plano, Illinois

PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

James R. Williams, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources Frank Aebly, University of Nebraska at Lincoln

The checklist utilized by the Authority will be similar to that which is shown below. Project Name: Location: Consulting Engineering Firm:

MT-EZ. Amendments to National Flood Insurance Program Maps. Application Form for Single Residential Structure Lot. FEMA Form Series August 2004

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

Adoption of Flood Insurance Rate Maps by Participating Communities

PREVENTION. City of Orem FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION

CITY OF PITTSBURGH Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Pittsburgh, PA (fax)

CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, OHIO FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION REGULATIONS

Substantial Improvement/Substantial Damage for Floodplain Administrators Mitigation Fact Sheet

Right-of-Way Permit Application Process (Plans that affect District owned or maintained right-of-way)

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

LAFAYETTE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology

SPECIAL PURPOSE FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION RESOLUTION BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO

Administrative Procedures Regarding the Application of Flood Damage Prevention

Adoption of Flood Insurance Rate Maps by Participating Communities. FEMA 495 / September 2012

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

SPECIAL PURPOSE FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION RESOLUTION MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO

How To Study Floodway

Chapter 10. The National Flood Insurance Program

Updated Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Zoning Ordinance Update. July 16, 2015 Policy Committee

SERVICES THAT MAY ONLY BE PERFORMED BY A NEW JERSEY PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR

Floodplain Information

ROSEAU COUNTY, MINNESOTA

Chapter 7 Ditches and Channels

Agenda. Presenter. The Current Form. Adobe Fillable Form. Elevation Certificates FEMA Form Elevation Certificates Training 11/14/2013

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Certified Floodplain Management and Land Development Design and Entitlement

MONTEZUMA COUNTY RESOLUTION _ FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION

April 24, Amend the Design and Construction Standards Manual to Update the Floodplain Management Standards # DPA Countywide

4. Minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects;

Control filling, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase erosion or flood damage; and

[Docket ID FEMA ; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1550] AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

Subject: No-Rise Certification for River Restoration Activities on a section of the West Fork White River near the Fayetteville Executive Airport

EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING. Frequently Asked Questions by Homeowners

Map Modernization and DFIRMs. Dr. Shane Parson, PE, CFM

Exercise (4): Open Channel Flow - Gradually Varied Flow

Request for Proposals for Topographic Mapping. Issued by: Teton County GIS and Teton County Engineering Teton County, Wyoming

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

Kanawha County Floodplain Regulations Quick Guide & Overview

What is the most obvious difference between pipe flow and open channel flow????????????? (in terms of flow conditions and energy situation)

CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

[Docket ID FEMA ; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1548] AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

NAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Transcription:

US Department of Homeland Security Region X 130 228 th Street, SW Bothell, WA 98021 Procedures for No-Rise Certification For Proposed Developments in the Regulatory Floodway Section 60.3 (d) (3) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations states that a community shall "prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base (100-year) flood discharge." Prior to issuing any building, grading or development permits involving activities in a regulatory floodway the community must obtain a certification stating the proposed development will not impact the pre-project base flood elevations, floodway elevations, or floodway data widths. The certification should be obtained from the applicant and be signed and sealed by a professional engineer. The engineering or "no-rise" certification must be supported by technical data. The supporting technical data should be based upon hydraulic analyses that utilize the same model used to prepare the effective Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) unless it is demonstrated that the effective hydraulic model is unavailable or its use is inappropriate. If an alternative hydraulic model is used, the new model must be calibrated to reproduce the FIS profiles within 0.5 feet. Hydraulic model used in the analysis must be on FEMA s accepted models list, or documentation must be provided showing the model meets the requirements of NFIP regulation 65.6(a)(6).

2 Although communities are required to review and approve the "no-rise" submittals, they may request, in writing, technical assistance and review from the FEMA regional office. However, if this alternative is chosen, the community must review the technical submittal package and verify that all supporting data, listed in the following paragraphs, are included in the package before forwarding to FEMA. To support a "no-rise" certification for proposed developments encroaching into the regulatory floodway, a community will require that the following procedures be followed: 1. Current Effective Model: Submit a written request for the effective model for the specified stream and community, identifying the limits of the requested data. A fee will be assessed for providing the data. Data request forms and instructions can obtained at: http://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-flood-hazardmapping/how-order-technical-administrative-support or by writing to: FEMA Engineering Library 847 S. Pickett Street Alexandria, VA 22304 Phone: 1-877-336-2627 Facsimile: 1-703-212-4090 2. Duplicate Effective Model: Upon receipt of the effective computer model, the engineer should run the original model to duplicate the output in the effective (FIS). 3. Corrected Effective Model: The model that corrects any errors that occur in the Duplicate Effective model, adds any additional cross sections, or incorporates more detailed topographic information than that used in the current effective model. Floodway limits should be manually set at the new cross-section locations by measuring from the effective FIRM or FBFM. The cumulative reach lengths of the stream should also remain unchanged. The Corrected Effective model must not reflect any manmade physical changes since the date of the effective model. 4. Existing, or Pre-Project Conditions Model: Revise the Duplicate Effective or the Corrected Effective model to reflect any modifications that have occurred within the floodplain since the date of the Effective model but prior to the construction of the project. If no modifications have occurred since the date of the effective model, then the model would be identical to the Duplicate Effective or Corrected Effective model. The results of this

3 Existing Conditions analysis will indicate the 100-yr elevations at the project site. 5. Proposed, or Post-Project Conditions Model: Modify the Existing Condition or Pre-Project Conditions Model (or Duplicate Effective model or Corrected Effective model, as appropriate) to reflect revised or post-project conditions. The overbank roughness coefficients should remain the same unless a reasonable explanation of how the proposed development will impact Manning's n values is included with the supporting data. The results of this analysis will indicate the 100-year elevation for proposed conditions at the project site. These results must indicate NO impact on the 100-year floodway elevations when compared to the Existing Conditions or Pre-Project Conditions model. If an increase results the project will require the submittal of a CLOMR prior to the start of the project. The "no-rise" supporting data and a copy of the engineering certification must be submitted to and reviewed by the appropriate community official prior to issuing a permit. The "no-rise" supporting data should include, but may not be limited to: 1) Copy of the Duplicate Effective model; 2) Copy of the Corrected Effective model; 3) Existing conditions, or Pre-Project conditions model 4) Proposed conditions or Post-Project conditions model. 5) FIRM and topographic map, showing floodplain and floodway, the additional cross-sections, the site location with the proposed topographic modification superimposed onto the maps, and a copy of the effective FIRM or FBFM showing the current regulatory floodway. 6) Documentation clearly stating analysis procedures. All modifications made to the original FIS model to represent revised existing conditions, as well as those made to the revised existing conditions model to represent proposed conditions, should be well documented and submitted with all supporting data. 7) Copy of effective Floodway Data Table copied from the (FIS) report. 8) Statement defining source of additional cross-section topographic data and supporting information. 9) Cross-section plots, of the added cross sections, for revised existing and proposed conditions.

4 10) Certified planimetric (boundary survey) information indicating the location of structures on the property. 11) Copy of the source from which input for original FIS model was taken. 12) CD with all input and output files. 13) Printout of output files from EDIT runs for all three floodway models. The engineering "no-rise" certification and-supporting technical data must stipulate NO impact on the 100-year flood or floodway elevations at the new cross-sections and at all existing cross-sections anywhere in the model. Therefore, the revised computer model should be run for a sufficient distance (usually one mile, depending on hydraulic slope of the stream) upstream and downstream of the development site to insure proper "no-rise" certification. Attached is a sample "no-rise" certification form that can be completed by a registered professional engineer and supplied to the community along with the supporting technical data when applying for a development permit.

5 ENGINEERING "NO-RISE" CERTIFICATION This is to certify that I am a duly qualified engineer licensed to practice in the State of. It is to further certify that the attached technical data supports the fact that proposed _will (Name of Development) not impact the 100-year flood elevations, floodway elevations and floodway widths on at published sections (Name of Stream) in the Flood Insurance Study for, (Name of Community) dated _ and will not impact the 100-year flood elevations, floodway elevations, and floodway widths at unpublished cross-sections in the vicinity of the proposed development. Attached are the following documents that support my findings: (Date) (Signature) (Title) (Seal) (Address)