TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG IMPORT TERMINAL. 6th Annual LNG Tech Global Summit rd 5th October 2011

Transcription

1 TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG IMPORT TERMINAL 3rd 5th October 2011 Rotterdam, Netherlands Jérémie ESQUIER Commercial Director

2 AGENDA SOFREGAZ OVERVIEW REFERENCES IN CONVENTIONAL LNG REGAS TERMINAL SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG REGAS PROJECTS 2

3 AGENDA SOFREGAZ OVERVIEW REFERENCES IN CONVENTIONAL LNG REGAS TERMINAL SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG REGAS PROJECTS 3

4 SOFREGAZ GENERAL OVERVIEW A fifty-year experienced Engineering and Contracting Company specialised in natural gas Activities: from Consulting to Lump Sum Turn Key projects Organisation based on 150 multidisciplinary employees 90% University and Technical College Graduates Worldwide experience with more than 850 projects since its creation Operations fully integrated inside Maire-Tecnimont Group Main activity: Engineering services and participation in EPC projects LNG: small liquefaction plants, LNG receiving terminals Gas processing plants Gas transmission, compression stations Projects size & Commercial strategy: E & EP projects within 100 M USD: Stand alone EPC projects in partnership / integration with Maire-Tecnimont group 4

5 ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES Feasibility studies Basic & Detailed Engineering Project Management Consulting Procurement / sourcing Construction Supervision Commissioning & start-up LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL BILBAO SPAIN 5

6 SHARE HOLDER Engineering & Main Contracting Process Engineering Licensing and IP Group Center E&C Infrastructure and Civil Eng. Renewable Energy Maire-Tecnimont Group: - Revenues 2010: 2,536 M - Backlog 31/12/10: 5,359 M 6

7 MAIRE TECNIMONT INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE About 5,200 employees, half of whom are employed outside Italy Presence in more than 30 countries with over 50 operating companies Italian headquarters: Rome, Milan MANPOWER* ITALY EUROPE ASIA SOUTH AMERICA TOTAL 2, , ,181 * Figures as of 31 March 2011 Presence of Maire Tecnimont Group 7

8 ALL THROUGH THE GAS CHAIN Production, treatment LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL HAZIRA INDIA LNG and LPG Transmission systems - Pumping and compression GAS TREATMENT WAFA LIBYA COMPRESSION STATION S3-S6 IRAN 8

9 SOFREGAZ PROCESS AND KNOW-HOW PRODUCTION AND TREATMENT (gas and oil fields) - Oil/gas gathering & separation - Dew point adjustment - Sweetening - Dehydration - LPG extraction - Crude oil stabilisation - Gas-lift - Gas re-injection Some references: - Dalan natural gas treatment plant (Iran) - Mesdar natural gas reinjection facility (Algeria) - R4-R5 natural gas boosting stations - phases II and III (Algeria) - Wafa gas treatment facilities (Libya) - FEED for the Kharg Island NGL recovery plant (Iran) 9

10 EXAMPLE OF GAS TREATMENT PROJECT WAFA GAS CONDENSATE TREATMENT PLANT - AGIP GAS BV - LIBYA Capacity: 4.44 BSCM/year sales gas EPC and technical assistance, commissioning and start-up contract. 10

11 SOFREGAZ PROCESS AND KNOW-HOW LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) - Peak shaving plants - LNG production units - Receiving and storage facilities Some references: - Revithoussa LNG receiving facilities (Greece) - Shanghai PuDong LNG peak shaving facilities (China) - Bilbao LNG terminal (Spain) - Guangdong LNG Terminal (China) - Hazira LNG Terminal (India) - Expansion of Revithoussa LNG receiving facilities (Greece) - Fos Cavaou LNG Terminal (France) - FEEDs for Dunkerque (France) and Panigaglia (Italy) LNG terminals 11

12 EXAMPLE OF LNG PROJECT DUNKERQUE LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL - DUNKERQUE LNG FRANCE Capacity: 8 16 BCM/Y Storage tanks: 3 x 190,000 m 3 Jetty for vessels from 75,000 to 267,000 m3 FEED, Preparation of EPC tender documents, Evaluation of EPC bids, Preparation of EPC contracts 12

13 SOFREGAZ PROCESS AND KNOW-HOW PIPELINE TRANSMISSION & COMPRESSION - Gas and liquid pipelines - Pumping and compressor stations - Telecommunication and SCADA systems Some references: - Beattock natural gas compressor station (United Kingdom) - Brighouse Bay natural gas compressor station (United Kingdom) - S3 S6 natural gas compressor stations (Iran) - FEED Turkey - Greece natural gas pipeline - FEED GALSI: Algeria-Sardinia-Italy natural gas pipeline stations 13

14 EXAMPLE OF GAS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PROJECT GAS PIPELINE ALGERIA-SARDINIA-ITALY - GALSI Capacity: 8 BCM/Y Length: onshore 281 km; subsea: 561 km Pre-FEED, FEED & preparation of tender documents for : Compression stations Pressure reduction & metering stations SCADA & Telecommunications 14

15 QHSE QUALITY is the core of our strategy. We developed a global approach of the Quality, from the consulting to the delivery of the project. SOFREGAZ considers HEALTH protection of the employees and the SAFETY aspects of the installations designed, as well as the protection of the ENVIRONMENT, an integrated part of the business objective. SOFREGAZ is certified ISO 9001, ISO and OHSAS

16 AGENDA SOFREGAZ OVERVIEW REFERENCES IN CONVENTIONAL LNG REGAS TERMINAL SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG REGAS PROJECTS 16

17 LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL REFERENCES SINCE 2000 DUNKERQUE France FOS CAVAOU CORSE France France LE VERDON France PANIGAGLIA CANAPORT Italy Canada BILBAO ADRIA Spain Croatia CACOUNA Canada PUERTO EL MUSEL REVITHOUSSA Spain Greece ARINAGA IDKU Spain HAZIRA PORT ESQUIVEL Egypt India Jamaica PEPILLO SALCEDO BRINDISI ROSIGNANO Dominican Republic Italy Italy SUAPE Brazil TANGSHAN SINGAPORE Singapore QINGDAO DALIAN ZHEJIANG JIANGSU SHANGHAI FUJIAN GUANGDONG HAINAN COEGA South Africa FEED (with PMC services) Studies (Feasibility/Conceptual/Process) EPC Contracts 17

18 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #1 FOS CAVAOU LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL Country: Client: Contractor: Contract value: Capacity: FRANCE GAZ DE FRANCE Integrated Joint Venture TECNIMONT - SOFREGAZ (50%)/ SAIPEM (50%) ~500 M EUR 6.5 Mt/year LNG Storage: 3 x 110,000 m 3 (full containment) Unloading Capacity: 12,000 m 3 /h LNG Carrier Size: 160,000 m 3 Jetty: Schedule: 200 m existing to be upgraded 55 months Start-up: First LNG unloaded November

19 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #1 FOS CAVAOU LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL 19

20 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #2 EXTENSION OF REVITHOUSSA LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL (GREECE) Country: Client: Contractor: GREECE DEPA Consortium SOFREGAZ (Leader) + ATHENA Contract value: 40 M EUR Capacity: Increase from 500 m 3 /h to 1,250 m 3 /h Unloading Capacity: Increase from 3,500 m 3 /h to 7,250 m 3 /h Schedule: 24 months Start-up:

21 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #3 GUANGDONG LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL (CHINA) Country: Client: CHINA BP + CNOOC & ALL Contractor: Integrated Joint Venture SAIPEM Leader SN TECHNIGAZ + TECNIMONT + SOFREGAZ Contract value: Capacity: 240 M EUR 3.5 (expendable to 6) Mt/y LNG Storage: 2 x 160,000 m 3 (full containment) Unloading Capacity: 12,000 m 3 /h LNG Carrier Size: 145,000 m 3 Jetty: Schedule: Start-up: 310 m 36 months (3rd tank) 21

22 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #4 HAZIRA LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL (INDIA) Country: Client: INDIA SHELL Contractor: Integrated Joint Venture SAIPEM SA SN TECHNIGAZ + TECNIMONT + TICB + SOFREGAZ Contract value: Capacity: 390 M EUR 2 Mt/y LNG Storage: 2 x 160,000 m 3 (full containment) Unloading Capacity: 12,000 m 3 /h LNG Carrier Size: 145,000 m 3 Jetty: Schedule: 1,300 m Start-up: months 22

23 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #5 BILBAO LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL (SPAIN) Country: Client: SPAIN BBG (BP + IBERDROLA + REPSOL + EVE) Contractor: Integrated Joint Venture SAIPEM SA SN TECHNIGAZ Leader (40%) + INITEC (33%) + SOFREGAZ (27%) Contract value: Capacity: 240 M EUR 2.7 Extended to 5 Mt/y LNG Storage: 2 x 150,000 m 3 (full containment) Unloading Capacity: 12,000 m 3 /h LNG Carrier Size: 135,000 m 3 Jetty: Schedule: Quay type Start-up: months 23

24 COMPLETED EPC PROJECT: EXAMPLE #6 REVITHOUSSA LNG RECEIVING TERMINAL (GREECE) Country: Client: Contractor: Contract value: Capacity: GREECE DEPA Consortium between an integrated Joint Venture SOFREGAZ Leader 50% + SAIPEM SA 50% and TECHNICAL UNION for construction 180 M EUR 1 Mt/y LNG Storage: by others Unloading Capacity: 12,000 m 3 /h LNG Carrier Size: 125,000 m 3 Jetty: Quay type Schedule: 34 months Start-up:

25 COMPLETED FEED: EXAMPLE #1 FEED for the DUNKERQUE LNG TERMINAL Location: France Client: Period: Description: FEED DUNKERQUE LNG (EDF) Technical assistance for preparation of permitting documents Cost estimate and implementation schedule Preparation of EPC tenders docs Evaluation of EPC bids & preparation of EPC contracts Design data: Capacity: 10 BCM/y (Phase 1) Tanks : Vaporization: 2 x 190,000 m 3 (+1 in future) ORVs supplied with power plant cooling water transported through a tunnel Send-out: 1.4 million m 3 /h 25

26 COMPLETED FEED: EXAMPLE #2 FEED for the HAINAN LNG TERMINAL Location: Client: China HAINAN LNG (Subsidiary of CNOOC) Period: Description: Conceptual design FEED Budget cost estimate Implementation schedule Preparation of EPC tender documents (Technical) Design data (new): Capacity: Initial 2 Mt/y 3 Mt/y Final 7.2 Mt/y Tanks : Initial 2 x 160,000 m 3 up to 9 tanks Vaporization: ORVs Sea water Send-out: 375,000 m 3 /h 560,000 m 3 /h 26

27 SOMME OTHER PROJECTS... FEED for the new PANIGAGLIA LNG TERMINAL Location: Italy Client: GNL ITALIA (ENI Group) Period: 2009 Description: Study of the dismantling of the existing terminal Design of the revamping of existing trestle and jetty head FEED of the new LNG Terminal Design data (new): Capacity: 8 BCM/y Tanks : 2 x 110,000 m 3 partially buried Vaporization: 5 SCV + 1 STV Send-out: 1 million m 3 /h FEED for the installation of a 4th tank in the Guangdong LNG Terminal Location: Client: Period: 2008 Description: Technical Feasibility and Impact Study Front End Engineering Design China GUANGDONG DAPENG LNG 27

28 AGENDA SOFREGAZ OVERVIEW REFERENCES IN CONVENTIONAL LNG REGAS TERMINAL SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG REGAS PROJECTS 28

29 WHICH MARKET FOR SMALL SCALE LNG REGAS? Installation of new gas-fired power plants (simple-cycle or combined-cycle power plants) in remote area (mainly islands) or revamping of iddle heavy fuel fired plants to be fed with LNG Three main geographical areas are concerned: South East Asia Caribbean Sea Mediterranean Sea 29

30 TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALL SCALE REGAS Necessity to combine a power station and natural gas supply (heavy fuel can be kept as back-up solution) No gas network availability Gas supplied through LNG and regasified on site. Power generation in between 100 MWe and 500 MWe Involve LNG capacities in the range of 0.1 to 0.5 MMTPA 30

31 AVAILABLE SOLUTIONS FOR SMALL SCALE REGAS Various options can be studied all presenting drawbacks and advantages The main common options are as follows: Onshore storage and regasification, including port and jetty for LNG Carriers, with unloading arms and all necessary facilities for operation Offshore storage in a vessel, including port and jetty with all necessary facilities; regasification on-shore Offshore storage and regasification in a FSRU, including port and jetty with all necessary facilities Offshore storage and regasification in an FSRU connected to the shore via monobuoy Shuttle and Regas Vessel (SRV) connected to the shore via monobuoy All of these solutions are industrially proven for larger capacities Preferred option strongly depends on the site conditions/market opportunities 31

32 TENTATIVE COMPARISON OF AVAILABLE SOLUTIONS Onshore Terminal FSU & regas onshore FSRU with Jetty FSRU with pipeline SRV Permitting Modularity Schedule Life Extend Downtime Employment Infrastructure necessity Capacity Safety (Cost) Elements mitigated by the construction of a Power Plant 32

33 POWER PLANT & LNG TERMINAL HEAT INTEGRATION TECNIMONT has been responsible for the design and construction of >230 power plant projects with a total installed capacity exceeding 20,000 MW (including simple-cycle and combined-cycle gas-fired power plants). During conceptual design phase the following synergies between the CCPP and the LNG terminal are analyzed in order to define the integration level: Heat recovery: definition of the cooling/vaporization system in order to use low temperature heat available at the steam turbine condenser for LNG vaporization Integration/optimization of utility production systems: definition of overall utility requirements and definition of common utility production systems Buildings integration/optimization: definition of overall functional requirements for building, identification of grouping strategy, definition of overall building list Others Achievable level of integration depends on the number of LNG terminal facility located on shore. Comparison between different LNG terminal configuration will consider the benefit deriving from its integration with CCPP. 33

34 NECESSITY OF A DEDICATED STUDY Necessity to perform a dedicated study based on the project environment & constraints SOFREGAZ propose to perform such kind of conceptual study in ~12 weeks: Phase I: Analysis of the site data basic factors (including meteocean conditions) to define the most suitable location for the terminal and discard immediately one or several options Phase II: Basic definition of various concepts Phase III: Comparison and analysis of the above defined concepts...development of the selected concept. Such study can be developed with any kind of options, even with a full offshore installation : floating storage associated with a floating power plant (such concept has already been studied by SOFREGAZ) 34

35 CONCLUSION As of today, there is an incentive to use LNG instead of Fuel Oil in small/medium size Power Plants located in remote area (mainly for environmental and economical considerations) SOFREGAZ has strong experience in conventional LNG Regas Terminal with >35 executed projects since 2000 (either at feasibility/conceptual, FEED or EPC stage) SOFREGAZ has developed specific expertise in Small Scale LNG Regas solutions. Using TECNIMONT Group expertise in Power Gen, SOFREGAZ proposes to select the optimized solution: For the small scale LNG Regas Terminal configuration For the Heat Integration between the LNG Regas & the PP 35

36 TECHNICAL AND ECONOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR SMALL SCALE LNG IMPORT TERMINAL 3rd 5th October 2011 Rotterdam, Netherlands Jérémie ESQUIER Commercial Director