Project Assessment : SESAR WP3.1 Integration of ATM Initiatives and Programmes

Transcription

1 Project Assessment : SESAR WP3.1 Integration of ATM Initiatives and Programmes ATM Projects Meeting Brussels, 14 November 2007 Presented by: Gunnar Frisk LFV (O-level 3.1.3) L.J.M. Dullaart LVNL, Stephen Williams NATS, Pascal Dias Eurocontrol (R-level 3.1)

2 Presentation Purpose WP3.1 - Integration of ATM Initiatives and Programmes Objective of this presentation is to provide:! An overview of the approach taken in analysing current ATM initiatives! Our initial view of the alignment of the EC projects Results expected to be:! Help the EC & the Projects to understand WP3.1 results! Help projects understand how to align themselves! WP3.1 to get project feedback on results Page: 2

3 Agenda Introduction Data Collection, Assessment & Analysis General Conclusion & Recommendations EC project Assessment results Summary WP3.1 overview Page: 3

4 Sokrates The definition of terms is the beginning of Wisdom KPA = Key Performance Areas ConOps = SESAR Operational Concept OCE = Operational Concept Element (pieces of the ConOps) IPs = Implementation Packages IP1: Short term 2013 Not WP3.1 scope (WP3.2)! IP2: Mid-term 2020 IP3: Long-term date when full ConOps is implementation OIs = Operational Improvements DLT = Task Deliverable DLM = Milestone deliverable Page: 4

5 WP3.1 Objectives Ensure that on-going European ATM initiatives that are relevant in the context of SESAR can be exploited to the maximum possible extent. Contribution to SESAR phase 4 (D4) Objective 3 as described in MOP D4: To assess current plans and on-going initiatives against the mid- and long-term targets and identify: those which are aligned to these targets; those which are not and therefore require a modification of the scope to contribute to the SESAR master plan; any gaps for which new activities should be scoped and initiated. This will Contribute to avoiding duplication, ensuring focus, reorientation of on-going work, exploiting potential for cooperation and reuse (keywords: gaps, overlaps, alignment, reuse) Contribute to the development of the Master Plan! Deliverable (DLT) developed to help the Master Plan Builders (in phase D5, D6) Page: 5

6 WP3.1 The Team R-level: Pascal Dias (ECTL) O-level: Juan Carrasco (ECTL) European Initiatives Dave Young (EEC) Impacts of non-european initiatives Gunnar Frisk (LFV) Recommendations W-level: ANSPs (AENA, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, LFV, LVNL, NATS, NAV PT), Industry (Airbus, Indra), Airport (BAA), Airline (Iberia), Military (EUROAMID), Eurocontrol (HQ, EEC) SESAR: John Guy (CIT), Alain Bodenan (PD) Page: 6

7 WP3.1 Overview Work conducted from Feb-Nov 2007 in SESAR phase D4, in 3 phases: Data Collection using Questionnaires distributed widely, filled by Projects Assessment using agreed scoring against KPAs and OCEs (and more) Analysis against SESAR R&D Needs and IPs Scope: Mid to long-term R&D and implementation ( ), short-term R&D (-2013) Short-term implementation covered by WP3.2 T0 T0+1 T0+2 T0+3 T0+4 T0+5 T0+6 T0+7 T0+8 Step 1 Identify all current ATM R&D Projects Step 2 Initial assessment Data Collection Step 3 Describe on-going ATM Initiatives Step 4 Assessment Step 5 Analysis and Reporting M1 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 Page: 7 M2

8 Agenda Introduction Data Collection, Assessment & Analysis General Conclusion & Recommendations EC project Assessment results Summary Understanding the work process Page: 8

9 WP3.1 Summary of Approach: Data Collection Aiming at complete coverage over European ATM R&D initiatives including national, military etc. presently not covered (to any larger extent), e.g. by ARDEP Collated information on different initiatives via a questionnaire 351 initiatives Identified 174 initiatives returned Questionnaires and was therefore Assessed Responses were good but patchy. Not unexpected given the timescales. E.g.: 102 initiatives reported budget data Substantial amount of national or regional initiatives reported Validation infrastructure initiatives also identified from EATRADA Ref: See DLT annex 2 for complete list Initiatives grouped into: Most significant ATM initiatives Eurocontrol Initiative Other ATM initiatives (clustered into small ATM, Research Infrastructure Methodology Developments, Implementation Planning, FABs, Specialized Technology Based initiatives) Page: 9

10 WP3.1 Summary of Approach: Assessment Each European initiative assessed against contribution to OCE and KPA Scoring also against context, participation, urgency, dependencies & confidence Based on content in Questionnaire, individual assessment & reconciliation workshops (expert judgement) 174 initiatives times 11 KPAs & 14 OCEs - HEAVY work! Ref: Method & Scoring described in DLT section 2.2 and Annex 1 Ref: Results in Master Spreadsheet Non-European and military initiatives assessed separately (no scoring) Page: 10

11 Assessment: Sample general statistics Validation level (E-OCVM) Estimated deployment dates >2020 Total V0 - ATM needs 1 1 V1 - Scope V2 - Feasibility V3 - Integration V 4 - Pre-operational V5 - Implementation Total projects Reported Maturity level by Deployment date 4 = International / multi stakeholder 4% 1 = Local only 25% Project count by participation 3 = European / multi stakeholder 57% 2 = National / multi stakeholder 14% Page: 11

12 Assessment: KPA statistics Project count Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability Page: 12

13 Assessment: ConOps statistics Project count New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management Page: 13

14 WP3.1 Summary of Approach: Analysis Objective: Make observations to draw conclusions and form recommendations. Analysis were performed against: Assessment against Key Performance Areas (KPAs) & Operational Concept Elements (OCEs) SESAR R&D Needs: Operational Concept Architecture Technology Human Factors Implementation Packages (IPs), including sub-ips Page: 14

15 Analysis against R&D Needs Analysis against 158 R&D needs expressed in SESAR phase 3 (D3 DLTs): WP2.2 ConOps R&D Needs (86) WP2.4 Architecture R&D Needs (26) WP2.5 Technology R&D Needs (28) WP1.7 HF/HR R&D Needs (18) ID Title Definition NR New requirement No current R&D was identified for the specific topic RO Re-orientate One or more projects were identified as contributing to the SESAR R&D need but new elements introduced by SESAR would need to be addressed CR Co-ordination needed Several projects which together meet the R&D need but which require coordination to ensure the R&D need is met, including some elements of new work CO Covered The current initiatives meet the SESAR needs (i.e. an area where SESAR continues the previous requirements. There were few projects not mapping to any R&D need Caveat: The D3 R&D needs produced bottom up. To be complemented by top down analysis during D4/D5. Page: 15

16 Analysis against IPs Initiatives mapped against the 84 sub-ips Short-term (IP1) analysis passed to 3.2 (but retained also in 3.1 DLT) For each sub-ip: Identified the contributing initiatives Analyse reported deployment dates vs. SESAR timeframe (Context/Availability) Specifically analyse initiative with no mapping to any IP (IP1-81 initiatives) IP2-108 initiatives IP3-46 initiatives IP1a IP2a IP3 IP1b There were few projects not mapping to any IP IP2b IP1c Page: 16

17 Analysis of R&D Needs by IP Number of R&D Needs WP3.1 focused on midlong term (IP2 & IP3) IP1 IP2 IP3 Implementation Package CO: Covered CR: Coordination required RO: Re-orientate NR: New requirement Page: 17

18 Agenda Introduction Data Collection, Assessment & Analysis General Conclusion & Recommendations EC project Assessment results Summary Gives projects an idea of SESAR gaps, overlaps, mis-alignments to help align themselves Page: 18

19 General Recommendations: Management of R&D In total, over 20 general recommendations all summarised below. Focus on few marked!! A single management authority should co-ordinate R&D effort required to implement the entire SESAR ConOps, including any local adaptations required inline with the one size does not fit all principle.! Improve information dissemination and transparency within the ATM R&D community to foster greater cooperation and coordination.! Develop R&D Observatory (going beyond the scope of ARDEP) to monitor and disseminate the on-going status of R&D.! Adopt the use of E-OCVM for all relevant projects! Extend E-OCVM to include: Lifecycle management processes KPA assessment processes HF assessment processes Page: 19

20 General Recommendations: Management of R&D! Ensure that sufficient R&D budget is identified and preserved for long term and innovative research in support of ATM improvements beyond the 2020 target. Strengthen existing working level arrangements with the USA and the Federation of Russia and seek similar relationships with China and Japan. Investigate the benefits of a working level arrangement with India. The SESAR JU should agree mechanisms to ensure alignment of ATM R&D activities with the ATM Master Plan (D5) with all Members and other sponsors of ATM R&D The ATM Master Plan (D5) should include requirement to rationalise existing validation infrastructure and to develop new validation infrastructure required to validate the SESAR ConOps. Page: 20

21 IP2 Recommendations: Overview of R&D Needs 37 R&D gaps identified: 22 - Concept of operations, 6 - Architecture 3 - Technology 6 - HF/HR 11% IP2 33% 26% NR: New requirement RO: Re-orientate CR: Coordination required CO: Covered 30% Page: 21

22 IP2 (Mid-term) Recommendations! The SESAR JU should ensure that results of previous R&D projects are used to baseline new initiatives such that that they are more directed to implementation objectives. The R&D Strategy, implemented through the SESAR JU work programme, must strike the correct balance between the absolute need for stakeholder participation, stakeholder buy-in and the need for timely delivery of the required level of performance. The existing initiatives should be included in the SESAR R&D Plan and managed by the SESAR JU.! Rationalisation of existing ATM projects is required to align specific initiatives to the SESAR operational improvements and to reduce the number of initiatives in each defined area. Page: 22

23 IP2 Recommendations The scope of new R&D initiated by the SESAR JU is more closely aligned with the SESAR implementation aims. The ATM Master Plan should include activities to monitor relevant non-atm developments to ensure that aviation is able to benefit from non-aviation standards. The R&D Plan should include new items for the 55 R&D needs not covered by existing projects The ATM Master Plan should include activities to support the achievement of all KPAs identified in D2 The maturity and value of existing ATM projects should be assessed in detail by the SESAR JU.! All ATM system developments should be consistent with the SESAR Architecture. The R&D plan should include early actions to establish the required architecture framework. Page: 23

24 IP2 Unsupported or late IPs Our analysis of initiatives supporting IP2 concludes that there is no-ongoing work on: IP2c - OI3 Datalink-based auto-brake/brake to vacate All other OI steps are supported, however the majority of the initiatives supporting the following have reported deployment dates that are too late for IP2: IP2e OI2 OAT Routing Page: 24

25 IP3 Recommendations: Overview of R&D Needs 37 R&D gaps identified: 19 - Concept of operations, 3 - Architecture 6 - Technology 6 - HF/HR 8% IP3 43% 31% NR: New requirement RO: Re-orientate CR: Coordination required CO: Covered 18% Page: 25

26 IP3 (Long-term) Recommendations Generally there are less current initiatives aligned to IP3 R&D needs E.g. greater divergence from previous ConOps Very long cycles important to stimulate creativity and innovation which will develop the scientific knowledge for the longer SESAR time horizons Develop the relations with Academia A reasonable target if 10% of the overall investments of R&D should be preserved and dedicated to the Longer Term Research activities (PHARE) Ensure that UAV integration in European Airspace is covered in the right time-frame Page: 26

27 IP3 Unsupported or late OI-steps Our analysis of initiatives supporting IP3 concludes that there is either no ongoing work in the following areas or the current work predicts deployment dates that are insufficient for IP3: OI2 Pre-defined ATS routes only when and where required OI3 Use of Free Routing from Terminal Area Operations exit to Terminal Area operations entry OI6 Synthetic Vision for the pilot in low visibility conditions OI7 Self adjustment of Spacing Depending Upon Wake Vortices OI13 ACAS adapted to new separation modes OI14 STCA adapted to new separation modes OI15 Improved Compatibility between ground and airborne safety nets Page: 27

28 Overall conclusion on gaps, overlaps & alignment GAPS: New elements introduced by SESAR are clearly not covered by existing R&D, e.g. UDPP: User Driven Prioritization Process SOA/EA: Service Oriented Architecture & Enterprise Architecture See WP3.1 DLT (and D4 DLM) for complete list. OVERLAPS: Several overlaps (many or uncoordinated initiatives on same subject) ALIGNMENT: All current R&D requires some orientation to align to SESAR. We see needs and opportunities to realign. E.g.: Operational Concept: Ensure the collaborative elements of SESAR are fully taken on board Architecture: Use of SOA/EA principles (develop the ATM Reference Information Model, Business Process Model, EA Framework, SWIM services) Technology: Least affected, but new specific technology challenges, i.e. new functional requirements must be derived/verified for the new concept HF/HR: Take account of new Operational Concept Page: 28

29 Agenda Introduction Data Collection, Assessment & Analysis General Conclusion & Recommendations EC project Assessment results Summary Gives projects an idea of assessed mapping to SESAR to help align themselves Page: 29

30 EC project Assessment: Preparation for today Extracted project summaries from WP3.1 DLT Volume 2 Short textual description of the project Project data such as start/end dates, budget, deployment date Alignment/mapping to SESAR Implementation Packages (IPs) and Operational Concept Elements (OCEs) Specific alignment guidance and comments! Available as hand-out Extracted information on alignment with SESAR: Key Performance Areas (KPAs) Operational Concept Elements (OCEs) Implementation Packages (IPs - OI Steps) R&D Needs (for ConOps, Architecture & Technology)! Presented in the next slides (2 per project) Material based on content in Questionnaire, assessment & reconciliation workshops (expert judgement) Note: R&D Needs mapping refer to numbering that can be found in the WP3.1 DLT. Page: 30

31 EMMA 2 European airport Movement Management by A-SMGCS Phase 2 Operational Concept Elements (list of OCEs as it was used by WP3.1) New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X X X 10 elements Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 7 areas X X X X X X X Page: 31

32 EMMA 2 European airport Movement Management by A-SMGCS Phase 2 IP mapping: IP1: IP1d Improving Airports/TMA Safety and IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 3, 8, 11 (study on the use of advanced, automated, aircraft systems such as auto-brake, controller workload reduction at airports, techniques for dynamic airspace management) Architecture: N/A Technology: 4, 16, 25 (coordinate at European level the evaluation, development, standardisation and validation of CNS technologies; cockpit moving map; Brake to Vacate & Airport Navigation and Surveillance technologies) HF/HR: N/A Page: 32

33 EPISODE 3 Operational Concept Elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability all 14 elements Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility 7 areas X X X X X X X Page: 33

34 EPISODE 3 IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: All IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 30 R&D needs!!! Architecture: 12 (Logical architecture Validation) Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 34

35 SOFIA (Safe Automatic Flight Back and Landing of Aircraft ) Operational Concept Elements 4 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 2 areas X X Page: 35

36 SOFIA IP mapping: IP1: IP1d Improving Airports/TMA Safety and IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: IP3a Maximising Benefits (Other initiatives) R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: 7 (Ground-Pilot System definition) Technology: 25 (Airport Navigation and Surveillance technologies to optimise approach, landing, and runway exit operations) HF/HR: N/A Page: 36

37 SWIM-SUIT (System Wide Information Management Supported by Innovative Technologies) Operational Concept Elements 10 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 9 areas X X X X X X X X X Page: 37

38 SWIM-SUIT IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 50, 74 (Evaluation of the security issues associated with CDM and SWIM; The evaluation of assumption that a 4D contract is less fuel efficient than other separation modes) Architecture: N/A Technology: 6 (Expedite activities to build a harmonised ground-ground communication system) HF/HR: N/A Page: 38

39 ERAT (Environmentally Responsible Air Transport) Operational Concept Elements 4 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 4 areas X X X X Page: 39

40 ERAT IP mapping: IP1: IP1c Ensuring Environmentally Sustainable Operations IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 33 (Evaluation of the use of shared airborne data) Architecture: 14 (ATM impact on the environment) Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 40

41 NEWSKY (Networking the Sky for Aeronautical Communications) Operational Concept Elements 3 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability all 11 areas X X X X X X X X X X X Page: 41

42 NEWSKY IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: N/A IP3: N/A Maps to IP3 communications environment but reorientation to SWIM principles is required. R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 42

43 ASSTAR (Advanced Safe Separation Technologies and Algorithms) This initiative was excluded from detailed assessment and analysis by WP3.1 due to early end date. Page: 43

44 ASPASIA (Aeronautical Surveillance & Planning by Advanced Satellite Implemented Applications) Operational Concept Elements 6 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 8 areas X X X X X X X X Page: 44

45 ASPASIA IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: N/A IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: N/A Technology: 5, 9 (new air ground datalinks, and the necessary transport mechanism; determine the necessary satellite configurations to achieve the required integrity performance) HF/HR: N/A Page: 45

46 RESET (Reduced Seperation Minima) Operational Concept Elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience X X X X X 5 elements Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 4 areas X X X X Page: 46

47 RESET IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP2d Augmenting En-route Safety and Efficiency IP3: Maximising benefits (Self separation in mixed modes) R&D needs: ConOps: 47, 60, 62, 63, 68, 80, 81 all separation related R&D needs Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 47

48 ERASMUS (En Route Air Traffic Soft Management Ultimate System) Operational Concept Elements 7 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 6 areas X X X X X X Page: 48

49 IP mapping: ERASMUS IP1: N/A IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP2b Trajectory management through information sharing IP2d Augmenting En-route Safety and Efficiency IP3: IP3a Maximising benefits (4D Contract for Equipped Aircraft with Extended Clearance) R&D needs: ConOps: 15, 16, 19, 21, 31, 74 (Automation topics; Evaluation of ground based de-confliction automation; Required accuracy of the FMS RTA function; All aspects of collaborative planning and agreement on 4D gate to gate trajectories; the impact of differential aircraft performance on the environmental and economic outcomes of ASAS spacing; The evaluation of assumption that a 4D contract is less fuel efficient than other separation modes) Architecture: 13 (Traffic complexity management) Technology: N/A HF/HR: 12 (The effects of automation on the different actors could be either reactive, complacent or have a reduced situation awareness) Page: 49

50 ART (Advanced Remote Tower) Operational Concept Elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience X X X X X 5 elements Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 6 areas X X X X X X Page: 50

51 ART IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 4, 8, 83, 86 (Evaluation of improvements to all weather operations ; Reduction of controller workload in towers; remotely operated aerodrome ATC; Investigate the types of sensors/ displays and controller support tools necessary to enable remote tower operation) Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 51

52 i-fly (Safety, complexity and responsibility based design and validation of highly automated air traffic management) Operational Concept Elements 6 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 2 areas X X Page: 52

53 i-fly IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: N/A IP3: IP3a Maximising benefits (Self Separation in Mixed Mode) R&D needs: ConOps: 13, 15 (all aspects of the operation of UAS and their integration with other managed air traffic; Automation topics) Architecture: 13 (Traffic complexity management) Technology: N/A HF/HR: 3, 5 (Human Factors issues of early ASAS applications and retrofit ASAS solutions ; Human Factors issues in relation to airspace transition (with/without ASAS) Page: 53

54 MIME (Market Based Impact Mitigation for the Environment) Operational Concept Elements 1 element New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 5 areas X X X X X Page: 54

55 MIME IP mapping: IP1: IP1c Ensuring Environmentally Sustainable Operations IP2: N/A IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: 14 (ATM impact on the environment) Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 55

56 SINBAD (Safety and security Improved by New functionality for Better Awareness on airport and departure traffic Domain) Operational Concept Elements 2 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 3 areas X X X Page: 56

57 SINBAD IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 57

58 CATS (Contract based Air Transportation System) Operational Concept Elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience 9 elements Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 8 areas X X X X X X X X Page: 58

59 CATS IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 7, 39, 64, 69, 79 (predictability of surface operations; appropriate scope of AMAN operations; Dynamic Route Allocation, 4D Contracts and ASAS-Self Separation in mixed mode environment ; Integration of ground calculated with air calculated 4D trajectory; Further development of the flight planning process) Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 59

60 INOUI (Innovative Operational UAV integration) Operational Concept Elements 6 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 6 areas X X X X X X Page: 60

61 IP mapping: INOUI IP1: N/A IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP2e Improving Operational Flexibility IP3: IP3a Maximising benefits (Two categories of airspace & Self Separation in Mixed Mode) R&D needs: ConOps: 13, 14, 15 (all aspects of the operation of UAS and their integration with other managed air traffic; impact of business trajectory ownership ; Automation topics) Architecture: 7 (Ground-Pilot System definition) Technology: N/A HF/HR: 21 (Examine human factors, recruitment, training, competence and staffing implications of UAS operators) Page: 61

62 SKY SCANNER (Development of an innovative LIDAR Technology for New Generation ATM Paradigms) Operational Concept Elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience X X X X X 5 elements Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 6 areas X X X X X X Page: 62

63 SKY SCANNER IP mapping: IP1: IP1d Improving Airports/TMA Safety and IP2: IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: IP3a Maximising benefits (Other initiatives) R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: N/A Technology: 25 (Integrated wake vortex detection and prediction technologies) HF/HR: N/A Page: 63

64 EPATS (European Personal Air Transportation System Study) Operational Concept Elements 2 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 3 areas X X X Page: 64

65 EPATS IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: N/A IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: N/A Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A This project is not strictly relevant to the core-sesar aims. However, few of the identified R&D needs address the role of General Aviation and Personal Transportation. Re-orientation to address Personal Transportation requirements in IP3 is recommended. Page: 65

66 Operational Concept Elements SUPERHIGHWAY (Development of an Operationally Driven Airspace Traffic Structure for High-Density High-Complexity areas based on the use of dynamic Airspace and Multilayered Planning) New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of 8 elements Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 4 areas X X X X Page: 66

67 SUPERHIGHWAY IP mapping: IP1: N/A IP2: N/A IP3: IP3a Maximising benefits (Other initiatives) R&D needs: ConOps: 66, 77, 80 (ASAS Separation procedures foresee flight crew being entrusted with separation provision tasks whilst retaining full situation awareness; prove that CDM processes put benefit into the ATM system; Elaboration of high density separation concepts) Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 67

68 CREDOS (Crosswind reduced Separations for Departures) Operational Concept Elements 3 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 4 areas X X X X Page: 68

69 CREDOS IP mapping: IP1: IP1d Improving Airports/TMA Safety and IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP2c Augmenting Airports/TMA Safety and Efficiency IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 8, 84 (reduction of controller workload at airports; innovative means to reduce dependency on Wake Vortex separation) Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 69

70 SPADE 2 (Supporting Platform for Airport Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis - Phase 2) Operational Concept Elements 8 elements New Separation Modes Maximise Utilisation of Rationalization of the ATM network CDM Trajectory Management Improved Situational Awareness Improved Resilience Environmental Management DCB Controller Task Load Reduction Automated Decision Support Information Management ATM Organization Airspace Management X X X X X X X X Key Performance Areas Safety Environmental Security Efficiency Predicability Flexibility Cost Effectiveness Access & Equity Participation Interoperability 8 areas X X X X X X X X Page: 70

71 SPADE 2 IP mapping: IP1: IP1a Generating (and unlocking latent) Network IP2: IP2a Improving predictability through Information sharing IP3: N/A R&D needs: ConOps: 1 (Study of airport processes associated with common understanding of a common planning process) Architecture: N/A Technology: N/A HF/HR: N/A Page: 71

72 Agenda Introduction Data Collection, Assessment & Analysis General Conclusion & Recommendations EC project Assessment results Summary Page: 72

73 Summary & Process of realignment WP3.1 was designed to support SESAR ATM Master Plan (D5) & Work Programme (D6) and is a step in realignment of current R&D to meet SESAR needs WP3.1 has generated specific conclusions on which current initiatives support which IPs (OI-steps) and R&D needs, indicating: Need and opportunities to realign ongoing initiatives Several gaps (as expected with the SESAR Performance Requirements and new ConOps) Several overlaps (too many or uncoordinated initiatives on same subject) During D5 and D6 the conclusions will be worked on to assess how best the mix of current projects for each area can be best aligned to achieve the SESAR objectives. This will lead to more detailed guidance on the need to re-align existing projects However: Ongoing initiatives could already now start working to demonstrate alignment in a better way, using SESAR D3&D4 deliverables, guided by the WP3.1 material Further analysis on the individual projects could be done based on the WP3.1 results The WP3.1 DLT proposes one way of using the 3.1 material to draw conclusions per project (section 2.3) We welcome comments on our findings to be considered for D5 Page: 73

74 Thank you for your attention! Contacts: Pascal Dias Eurocontrol - pascal.dias@eurocontrol.int (R-level 3.1) Gunnar Frisk LFV gunnar.frisk@lfv.se (O-level 3.1.3) L.J.M. Dullaart LVNL - L.J.M.Dullaart@lvnl.nl Stephen Williams NATS steve.williams@nats.co.uk