# Time Ordered Perturbation Theory

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013

2 Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field We have so far quantized the free scalar field and the free Dirac field. We also would like to understand the free electromagnetic field, before proceeding to interacting theories. Your text deals with this very briefly, simply guessing a form for the propagator. We can be a little more systematic, in a fashion which is instructive.

3 A Tension In a gauge theory like electromagnetism, there is a tension between two basic principles: Lorentz invariance and unitarity (unitarity is the statement that in quantum mechanics, time evolution is described by a unitary operator, as a result of which probability is conserved). If we choose Lorentz gauge: µ A µ = 0 (1) and follow our usual quantization procedure, we will be lead to write: A µ d 3 p (x) = (2π) 3 (a µ (p)e ip x + a µ e ip x ) (2) 2E p [a µ (p), a ν (p)] = g µν (2π) 3 δ( p p ). (3)

4 The problem is with the a o commutator. The states a o 0 > have negative norm (check!). Doesn t sound good for quantum mechanics. It turns out that the states with negative norm are never produced in scattering processes, but proving this is a bit involved. An alternative approach gives up manifest Lorentz invariance. One chooses the Coulomb (or transverse" or radiation") gauge: A = 0 (4)

5 Note that in writing this condition, we are making a choice of Lorentz frame. The expansion of the gauge field is now: A i (x) = d 3 p (2π) 3 2E p (a(p, λ)ɛ i (p, λ)e ip x +a (p, λ)ɛ i (p, λ)e ip x ). (5)

6 From the gauge condition, p ɛ(p, λ) = 0. (6) The commutation relations of the a s are just what you might expect: [a(p, λ), a (p, λ )] = δ λ,λ (2π) 3 δ( p p ). (7)

7 From these expressions we can work out the propagator. In this computation, analogous to what we saw in the Dirac case, one encounters: ɛ i (p, λ)ɛ j (p, λ) = P ij (p) = (δ ij pi p j ). (8) p 2 λ Then (Exercise: check): T < A i (x)a j (y) >= d 4 p eip x ip ij( p) (2π) 4 p 2 + iɛ (9)

8 It is also natural to define a propagator for the scalar potential, remembering that propagators are just Green s functions. In momentum space, this is just < A o A o >= i 1 p 2. (10)

9 Not surprisingly, these propagators don t look very Lorentz invariant. But we can fix this by noting that the full propagator can be written (in momentum space, using the "west coast metric"): D µν = gµν p 2 + iɛ p µ p ν p 2 (p 2 + iɛ) + ηµ p ν + η ν p µ (p 2 + iɛ) (11) where η = ( po p 2, 0, 0, 0) is a fixed four vector. Exercise: Check this. Don t worry about the iɛ s.

10 Now in electrodynamics, A µ couples to j µ, a conserved current. So p µ always multiplies j µ (p), and thus these terms vanish by current conservation. We will actually see how this works in scattering amplitudes later. As a result, we can use the covariant propagator. Note that this is the propagator one might have written in Lorentz gauge by analogy with the propagator for a scalar field. The fact that in the end one can write manifestly Lorentz invariant Feynman rules means that the non-lorentz invariant gauge choice doesn t matter in the end. It is possible to prove that, in Coulomb gauge, there are a nice set of operators which generate Lorentz invariance. But this is rather involved and, for the moment, not particularly instructive.

11 Interacting Field Theories Consider, first, our scalar field. Lorentz invariance allows many other terms: L = 1 2 (( µφ) 2 m 2 φ 2 Γ 3 φ 3 λ 4 φ4 1 M φ (12) We will stop at φ 4 ; generally we won t include operators of negative mass dimension ( non-renormalizable"). Let s look at φ 3, in the language of old fashioned perturbation theory. We can have processes which change the number of particles.

12 Quantum Electrodynamics So far we have free fields: L = 1 4 F 2 µν + ψ( m)ψ. (13) To decide how to couple the gauge field, A µ, to fermions, we will focus on the principle of gauge invariance. We take A µ A µ + µ ω(x) ψ e iω(x) ψ(x). (14) Then the covariant derivative transforms like ψ: D µ ψ = ( µ ia µ )ψ; D µ ψ e iω(x) D µ ψ (15) We also introduce a constant e, the electric charge: L = 1 4e 2 F 2 µν + ψ( D m)ψ. (16) This lagrangian is Lorentz and gauge invariant.

13 One often rescales the fields, in which case A µ ea µ (17) A µ A µ + 1 e µω(x) ψ e iω(x) ψ(x). (18) D µ ψ = ( µ iea µ )ψ (19) In this form, the role of e as a coupling is clearer, but gauge invariance involves e in an odd way (it will be more odd when we confront renormalization). The alternative form gives gauge invariance a more geometric" character.

14 Now, adopting the methods of old fashioned (time-ordered) perturbation theory, we have, for the interaction Hamiltonian: H I = e ψa µ γ µ ψ (20) and we have the possibility of creating and destroying electrons, positrons and photons in physical processes. Our goal is to develop a more covariant treatment of these processes.

15 Pictures in Quantum Mechanics We usually work with quantum mechanics in the Schrodinger picture, in which states depend on time, but operators like x and p are independent of time. In the Schrodinger picture: Ψ S (t) >= U(t, t o ) Ψ(t o ) >. (21) The time-development operator is just: U(t, t o ) = e ih(t to) (22) and it satisfies: i U = HU. (23) t

16 U has the important properties that: U (t, t o ) = U(t o, t); U(t, t 1 )U(t 1, t o ) = U(t, t o ) (24) Another picture which is convenient for certain purposes is the Heisenberg picture. In this picture, the states are independent of time, but operators are now time-dependent: Ψ H (t) >= U (t, t o ) Ψ S (t) >= Ψ S (t o ) > (25) while O H (t) = U (t, t o )O S U(t, t o ). (26)

17 Note that with this definition: < Ψ H O H Ψ H >=< Ψ S O S Ψ S > (27) and i t O H = U HO S U + U O S HU = [H, O H ] (28) This is actually an operator version of Ehrnfest s theorem. You can check, for example, that for a particle in a potential, the operators obey the classical equations of motion.

18 As an example, consider the raising and lowering operators for a harmonic oscillator. So So H = ω( a a) [a, a ] = 1. (29) [H, a] = ωa (30) d dt a H = iωa H. (31) a H (t) = e iωt a H (0) (32) which is the form that we have become familiar with in our field expansions.

19 Probably the most useful picture is the interaction picture." Here we suppose that the Hamiltonian is of the form: H = H o + H I (33) where H o is a Hamiltonian which we know how to diagonalize (in the field theory case, this will be the free Hamiltonian). The basic assumption of perturbation theory will be that H I is in some sense small.

20 Then we remove the part of the time dependence we understand and write Ψ I >= e iho(t to) Ψ S (t) > (34) = e iho(t to) e ih(t to) Ψ S (t 0 ) > So we define the time-development operator in the interaction picture: U I (t, t o ) = e iho(t to) e ih(t to) (35) and define the time-dependent operators: O I (t) = e iho(t to) O S e iho(t to) (36)

21 It is a simple exercise to show that U I obeys: where i t U I = H I (t)u I ; U I (t, t) = 1. (37) H I (t) = e iho(t to) H I e iho(t to) (38) U I has composition properties similar to those of U. These are most easily proven by writing U in a slightly different form: U I (t, t ) = e iho(t to) e ih(t t ) e iho(t t o) (39) This obeys the correct equation and boundary condition (check!). It also manifestly satisfies: U I (t, t o) = U I (t o, t); U I (t, t 1 )U I (t 1, t 2 ) = U(t, t 2 ) (40)

22 Solving this equation iteratively (see your favorite quantum mechanics book, e.g. eqns in Shankar or p. 85 of PS) yields the standard expansion of time-dependent perturbation theory. For our purposes, however, the most useful form is: U I (t, t 0 ) = T e ( i ) t t dt H I (t ) 0. (41)

23 The derivation of eqn. 41 proceeds iteratively, starting with the basic differential equation; the goal is a power series expansion of U I in powers of H I. First take U I 1 and substitute back in eqn. 37. This yields: U I (t) i Repeating (e.g. derive by induction) + t t 0 dt 1 H I (t 1 ) (42) U I (t) = (43) ( ) n 1 t t1 t2 tn 1 dt 1 H I (t 1 ) dt 2 H I (t 2 ) dt 1 H I (t 3 )... dt n H I (t n )+... i t 0 t 0 t 0 t 0 In the usual treatment in quantum mechanics, one starts with some initial and final states, and introduces complete sets of energy eigenstates; the time integrals are just integrals of exponentials, yielding energy denominators (in quantum mechanics, one introduces iɛ so that the interaction turns off in the past; this damps the integral).

24 But Dyson s crucial observation was to note that the operators H I are time ordered in the expression above. So one can take the n th term above and take the upper limit to be t in each term, if one introduces a time ordering symbol, and divides by 1 n! to take care of over counting. So we are interested in field theory in the object: dth I = d 4 xl I (44) which is Lorentz invariant; we have already discussed the Lorentz invariance of the time ordering symbol.

25 Born Approximation in Quantum Mechanics The proper derivation of the formulae for the S-matrix considers wave packets (see your textbook, pp ). But if one is willing to forget niceties, one can derive the usual expressions very quickly. First, in non-relativistic scattering, we are interested in < p f U I (T, T ) p I >, where it is understood that in the end we want to take the limit T. To first order, staying away from the forward direction (so that the unit operator piece in U does not contribute, this is T < p f U I (T, T ) p I >=< p f dt e i(e f E i )t V p I > T = 2πδ(E f E i ) < p f V p I >.

26 Now comes the sleight of hand. We need to square this. Interpret δ(e f E i ) 2 = δ(0)δ(e f E i ). 1 δ(0) = lim T 2π = 1 2π T. T T dt

27 To get the cross section, divide by T, to get the transition rate per unit time, and integrate over final states (e.g. all momenta in some solid angle, Ω), and divide by the flux, p m, to give dσ = Ω d 3 p f (2π) 3 < p f V p i > 2 m p δ(e f E i ). This is the famous Born approximation for the scattering by a particle in a potential.

28 Relativistic Generalization Now we repeat this for field theory. We specialize to processes with two incoming particles, and any number of outgoing particles. So we are interested in < p 1... p N U(T, T ) k A k B >=< p 1... p N S k A k B > (technically, the S matrix is defined to act between in and out states; see your text). Then we define: S = 1 + it

29 Because of space-time translation invariance, the T matrix always contains a δ function, so we write: < p 1... p N it k A k B >= (2π) 4 δ(k A +k B p i )im(k A, k B {p i }) Note here that all momenta are on shell", p 2 i + m 2 = E 2 i. Don t be nervous about the δ-function; when we actually do computation it will pop out. Now we square. We interpret δ(0) = VT, in analogy to what we did in the non-relativistic case. Divide now by T, to get the transition rate per unit time, and V, corresponding to a constant target density (non-localized states). Divide also by the flux, which as in the non-relativistic limit goes as v A v B, but is also multiplied by 2E A 2E B due to our normalization of the states. You can check that this flux is invariant under boosts along the beam axis. So we have:

30 dσ = 1 2E A 2E B v A v B ( d 3 ) p i 1 Π (2π 3 ) 2E pi M(k A, k B {p i }) 2 (2π) 4 δ(k A + k B p i ). Exercise: Repeat this exercise for the decay of a particle, and derive Peskin and Schroder s expression 4.86.

31 It will turn out that the essential information in quantum field theories spectra, S-matrices and the like is contained in correlation functions or Green s functions. We will motivate this gradually, but it will be instructive and simplest to begin by studying these objects. For our scalar field theories, these objects are: G(x 1,..., x n ) = Ω T (φ(x 1)φ(x 2 ) φ(x n )) Ω. (45) Ω Ω Here the φ s are fields in the Heisenberg picture, T is the time ordering symbol; Ω is the ground state of the full interacting field theory. Because the φ s are scalars and the time-ordering operation is Lorentz invariant (when it matters), this object should have nice Lorentz properties.

32 To develop perturbation theory, our first goal is to write this in terms of operators in the interaction picture. For this we need to use the operator U to rewrite the fields, φ, in terms of interaction picture operators, and Ω in terms of interaction picture states and operators. Let s start with the latter problem. From completeness of the full Hamiltonian, with assumed energy eigenstates n, and corresponding energy eigenvalues E n, we have e iht 0 = e ie 0T Ω Ω 0 + n 0 e ient n n 0. (46) Letting T (1 iɛ) eliminates all states from the sum except the ground state, so we can solve for Ω :

33 ( 1 Ω = lim e Ω 0 ) ie0t e iht 0 (47) T (1 iɛ) ( 1 = lim e ie 0(T +t 0 Ω 0 ) ) e ih(t +t 0 ) 0 T (1 iɛ) ( 1 = lim e ie 0(t 0 ( T Ω 0 ) )) e ih(t 0 ( T )) e ih 0( T t 0 ) 0 T (1 iɛ) (in the last step we have taken H 0 0 = 0).

34 So we have shown that Ω = lim AU(t 0, T ) 0. (48) Here A = ( e ie 0(t 0 ( T )) Ω 0 ) 1. (49) Also Ω = A 0 U(T, t 0 ). (50) The factor A looks nasty, but as we will see it will cancel out between the expressions in the numerator and denominator in our correlation functions.

35 The two point function, for example, is given by: G(x, y) = T Ω φ(x)φ(y) Ω Ω Ω (51) which, for x 0 > y 0 is = 0 U(T, t 0)U (x 0, t 0 )φ I (x)u(x 0, t 0 )U (y 0, t 0 )φ I (y)u(y 0, t 0 )U(t 0, T ) 0. 0 U(T, t 0 )U(t 0, T ) 0 Using the properties of the time-ordering symbol and the composition properties of the U s this is G(x, y) = T 0 U(T, x 0 )φ I (x)u(x 0, y 0 )φ I (y)u(y 0, T ) 0. (52) 0 TU(T, t 0 )U(t 0 T ) 0 Now all factors are time-ordered, and it is understood that we will take the limit T in the end, so using our explicit expression for U (noting, now, that there was nothing special about this particular ordering):

36 G(x, y) = 0 T φ I(x)φ I (y)u(t, x 0 )U(x 0, y 0 )U(y 0, T ) 0 0 U(T, T ) 0 (53) = 0 T φ I(x)φ I (y)exp( i T T dth I(t)) 0 0 T exp( i T T dt H. I(t)) 0 This is the essential relation.

37 Wick s Theorem This expression is readily evaluated using a result known as Wick s theorem". Need, first, notion of normal ordering. In general, the interaction picture operators consist of a s and a s. For a set of a s, a s, we define the normal ordered product as the product with all destruction operators to the right, all creation operators to the left. We denote this product with the symbol: N(φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )... φ(x n )) or : φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )... φ(x n ) : (54)

38 For example, N(a(p 1 )a (p 2 )a (p 3 )a(p 4 )) = a (p 2 )a (p 3 )a(p 1 )a(p 4 ). (55) Note that the normal ordered product of any set of operators has vanishing expectation value. This will be very important to us.

39 We write φ = φ + + φ, where φ + involves positive frequencies (annihilation operators), and φ negative frequencies (creation operators). φ + (x) = So, e.g., d 3 p a(p)e ip x (2π) 3 ; φ + (x) = d 3 p (2π) 3 a(p)e ip x. (56) N(φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )) = φ + (x 1 )φ + (x 2 ) + φ (x 1 )φ + (x 2 ) (57) +φ (x 2 )φ + (x 1 ) + φ (x 1 )φ (x 2 ) and similarly for longer strings of operators.

40 A general product, and in particular a time ordered product of the type of interest to us in the interaction picture, can be related to normal products by commuting creation and destruction operators through each other. These commutators are just c-numbers. Wick s theorem relates time ordered products to products of propagators and normal products of operators. The basic statement: T (φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )... φ(x n )) = N(φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 )... φ(x n )) (58) +D(x 1, x 2 )N(φ(x 3 )φ(x 4 )... φ(x n )) + perms D(x 1, x 2 )D(x 3, x 4 )... D(x n 1, x n ) + perms. Since we are interested in vacuum expectation values of time ordered products, typically only the last term is of interest to us (but more later).

41 This is clearly a theorem which must be proven by induction. consider the case of the "two-point function". This is simple because the ordering is of no consequence except for terms involving φ + and φ. Choose a particular time ordering (x1 0 > x 2 0 ). To put things in normal order, it is only necessary to commute φ + (x 1 )φ (x 2 ). Since the commutator is a c-number, we obtain the same result as for the propagator (for this time ordering); similarly for the reversed time ordering.

42 Explicitly, for the two point function, if x 0 1 > x 0 2 : T φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 ) = φ + (x 1 )φ + (x 2 )+φ + (x 1 )φ (x 2 )+φ (x 1 )φ + (x 2 )+φ (x 1 )φ (x 2 ) (59) = φ + (x 1 )φ + (x 2 )+φ (x 1 )φ (x 2 )+φ (x 2 )φ + (x 1 )+φ (x 1 )φ + (x 2 )+[φ(x 1 ), φ(x 2 )] and the last term, which is a c-number, can be evaluated by taking the vacuum expectation value, and equals T 0 φ(x 1 )φ(x 2 ) 0 (60) for this time ordering. The case x2 0 > x 1 0 follows in the same way. I will leave for you the inductive proof (to read about in your text and experiment with on your own). You should at least do for the four point function to get some feeling for what is going on.

43 Perturbation Theory in φ 4 theory We are ready to apply this to the theory with λφ 4 coupling. We compute the two point function, but including corrections from the interaction.

### Feynman diagrams. 1 Aim of the game 2

Feynman diagrams Contents 1 Aim of the game 2 2 Rules 2 2.1 Vertices................................ 3 2.2 Anti-particles............................. 3 2.3 Distinct diagrams...........................

### Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory. Don Colladay. New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A.

June 2012 Introduction to SME and Scattering Theory Don Colladay New College of Florida Sarasota, FL, 34243, U.S.A. This lecture was given at the IUCSS summer school during June of 2012. It contains a

### Harmonic Oscillator Physics

Physics 34 Lecture 9 Harmonic Oscillator Physics Lecture 9 Physics 34 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, February th, 00 For the harmonic oscillator potential in the time-independent Schrödinger equation: d ψx

### Three Pictures of Quantum Mechanics. Thomas R. Shafer April 17, 2009

Three Pictures of Quantum Mechanics Thomas R. Shafer April 17, 2009 Outline of the Talk Brief review of (or introduction to) quantum mechanics. 3 different viewpoints on calculation. Schrödinger, Heisenberg,

### 1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 Basic notions of operator algebra. In the previous lectures we have met operators: ˆx and ˆp = i h they are called fundamental operators. Many operators

### SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY

SCATTERING CROSS SECTIONS AND LORENTZ VIOLATION DON COLLADAY New College of Florida, 5700 Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34243, USA E-mail: colladay@sar.usf.edu To date, a significant effort has been made

### Rate of convergence towards Hartree dynamics

Rate of convergence towards Hartree dynamics Benjamin Schlein, LMU München and University of Cambridge Universitá di Milano Bicocca, October 22, 2007 Joint work with I. Rodnianski 1. Introduction boson

### Special Theory of Relativity

June 1, 2010 1 1 J.D.Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition, Chapter 11 Introduction Einstein s theory of special relativity is based on the assumption (which might be a deep-rooted superstition

### The career of a young theoretical physicist consists of treating the harmonic oscillator in ever-increasing levels of abstraction.

2. Free Fields The career of a young theoretical physicist consists of treating the harmonic oscillator in ever-increasing levels of abstraction. Sidney Coleman 2.1 Canonical Quantization In quantum mechanics,

### The Essentials of Quantum Mechanics

The Essentials of Quantum Mechanics Prof. Mark Alford v7, 2008-Oct-22 In classical mechanics, a particle has an exact, sharply defined position and an exact, sharply defined momentum at all times. Quantum

### Time dependence in quantum mechanics Notes on Quantum Mechanics

Time dependence in quantum mechanics Notes on Quantum Mechanics http://quantum.bu.edu/notes/quantummechanics/timedependence.pdf Last updated Thursday, November 20, 2003 13:22:37-05:00 Copyright 2003 Dan

### Relativistic Electromagnetism

Chapter 8 Relativistic Electromagnetism In which it is shown that electricity and magnetism can no more be separated than space and time. 8.1 Magnetism from Electricity Our starting point is the electric

### Operator methods in quantum mechanics

Chapter 3 Operator methods in quantum mechanics While the wave mechanical formulation has proved successful in describing the quantum mechanics of bound and unbound particles, some properties can not be

### The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb The Importance of the Harmonic Oscillator The quantum harmonic oscillator holds a unique importance in quantum mechanics, as it is both one of the few problems

### MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCES IN PHYSICS (MS PHYS) (LIST OF COURSES BY SEMESTER, THESIS OPTION)

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS Admission Requirements 1. Possession of a BS degree from a reputable institution or, for non-physics majors, a GPA of 2.5 or better in at least 15 units in the following advanced

### Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory. Hans de Vries

Chapter 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory Hans de Vries January 2, 2009 2 Chapter Contents 22 The Hamiltonian and Lagrangian densities

### Simple harmonic motion

PH-122- Dynamics Page 1 Simple harmonic motion 02 February 2011 10:10 Force opposes the displacement in A We assume the spring is linear k is the spring constant. Sometimes called stiffness constant Newton's

### Notes on wavefunctions III: time dependence and the Schrödinger equation

Notes on wavefunctions III: time dependence and the Schrödinger equation We now understand that the wavefunctions for traveling particles with momentum p look like wavepackets with wavelength λ = h/p,

### Mixed states and pure states

Mixed states and pure states (Dated: April 9, 2009) These are brief notes on the abstract formalism of quantum mechanics. They will introduce the concepts of pure and mixed quantum states. Some statements

### 1D 3D 1D 3D. is called eigenstate or state function. When an operator act on a state, it can be written as

Chapter 3 (Lecture 4-5) Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Now we turn to an application of the preceding material, and move into the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is based on a series

### Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory Peter Woit Columbia University Texas Tech, November 21 2013 Peter Woit (Columbia University) Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory November 2013 1 / 30

### Notes on Quantum Mechanics

Notes on Quantum Mechanics K. Schulten Department of Physics and Beckman Institute University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign 405 N. Mathews Street, Urbana, IL 680 USA April 8, 000 Preface i Preface The

### Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Sunil Mukhi SERC Preparatory School, Goa, Oct-Nov 2010 Contents 1 Scalar fields 3 1.1 Preliminaries: why QFT?............................ 3 1.2 Classical fields...................................

### Lecture 1: Microscopic Theory of Radiation

253a: QFT Fall 2009 Matthew Schwartz Lecture : Microscopic Theory of Radiation Blackbody Radiation Quantum Mechanics began on October 9, 900 with Max Planck s explanation of the blackbody radiation spectrum.

### - develop a theory that describes the wave properties of particles correctly

Quantum Mechanics Bohr's model: BUT: In 1925-26: by 1930s: - one of the first ones to use idea of matter waves to solve a problem - gives good explanation of spectrum of single electron atoms, like hydrogen

### For the case of an N-dimensional spinor the vector α is associated to the onedimensional . N

1 CHAPTER 1 Review of basic Quantum Mechanics concepts Introduction. Hermitian operators. Physical meaning of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of Hermitian operators. Representations and their use. on-hermitian

### Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system.

Chapter 13 Observables and Measurements in Quantum Mechanics Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system. As we have seen, this is most succinctly done

### Assessment Plan for Learning Outcomes for BA/BS in Physics

Department of Physics and Astronomy Goals and Learning Outcomes 1. Students know basic physics principles [BS, BA, MS] 1.1 Students can demonstrate an understanding of Newton s laws 1.2 Students can demonstrate

### The Schrödinger Equation

The Schrödinger Equation When we talked about the axioms of quantum mechanics, we gave a reduced list. We did not talk about how to determine the eigenfunctions for a given situation, or the time development

### H = = + H (2) And thus these elements are zero. Now we can try to do the same for time reversal. Remember the

1 INTRODUCTION 1 1. Introduction In the discussion of random matrix theory and information theory, we basically explained the statistical aspect of ensembles of random matrices, The minimal information

### Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

Physics 9e/Cutnell correlated to the College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives Big Idea 1: Objects and systems have properties such as mass and charge. Systems may have internal structure. Enduring

### PQM Supplementary Notes: Spin, topology, SU(2) SO(3) etc

PQM Supplementary Notes: Spin, topology, SU(2) SO(3) etc (away from the syllabus, but interesting material, based on notes by Dr J.M. Evans) 1 Rotations and Non-contractible Loops Rotations in R 3 can

### 4. The Infinite Square Well

4. The Infinite Square Well Copyright c 215 216, Daniel V. Schroeder In the previous lesson I emphasized the free particle, for which V (x) =, because its energy eigenfunctions are so simple: they re the

### Harmonic Oscillator and Coherent States

Chapter 5 Harmonic Oscillator and Coherent States 5. Harmonic Oscillator In this chapter we will study the features of one of the most important potentials in physics, it s the harmonic oscillator potential

### Special Relativity and Electromagnetism Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

Special Relativity and Electromagnetism Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN United States Particle Accelerator School, University of California - Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa, CA 14 th 18 th January 2008 1 Outline Notions

### Thomson and Rayleigh Scattering

Thomson and Rayleigh Scattering Initial questions: What produces the shapes of emission and absorption lines? What information can we get from them regarding the environment or other conditions? In this

### APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL INTRODUCTION This syllabus serves to examine candidates knowledge and skills in introductory mathematical and statistical methods, and their applications. For applications

### Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N)

Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N) The irreducible representations of SO(3) are appropriate for describing the degeneracies of states of quantum mechanical systems which have rotational symmetry in three

### Meson cloud effects in the electromagnetic hadron structure

Meson cloud effects in the electromagnetic hadron structure Daniel Kupelwieser Thesis supervisor: Wolfgang Schweiger Collaborators: Elmar Biernat, Regina Kleinhappel Universität Graz Graz Jena monitoring

### Introduction to Schrödinger Equation: Harmonic Potential

Introduction to Schrödinger Equation: Harmonic Potential Chia-Chun Chou May 2, 2006 Introduction to Schrödinger Equation: Harmonic Potential Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation For a nonrelativistic particle

### Thomson and Rayleigh Scattering

Thomson and Rayleigh Scattering In this and the next several lectures, we re going to explore in more detail some specific radiative processes. The simplest, and the first we ll do, involves scattering.

### Generally Covariant Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 15 Generally Covariant Quantum Mechanics by Myron W. Evans, Alpha Foundation s Institutute for Advance Study (AIAS). (emyrone@oal.com, www.aias.us, www.atomicprecision.com) Dedicated to the Late

### Does Quantum Mechanics Make Sense? Size

Does Quantum Mechanics Make Sense? Some relatively simple concepts show why the answer is yes. Size Classical Mechanics Quantum Mechanics Relative Absolute What does relative vs. absolute size mean? Why

### Lecture 5 Motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field

Lecture 5 Motion of a charged particle in a magnetic field Charged particle in a magnetic field: Outline 1 Canonical quantization: lessons from classical dynamics 2 Quantum mechanics of a particle in a

### Lévy path integral approach to the fractional Schrödinger equation with delta-perturbed infinite square well

7 th Jagna International Workshop (204 International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series Vol. 36 (205 56005 (5 pages c The Authors DOI: 0.42/S200945560050 Lévy path integral approach to the fractional

### From Einstein to Klein-Gordon Quantum Mechanics and Relativity

From Einstein to Klein-Gordon Quantum Mechanics and Relativity Aline Ribeiro Department of Mathematics University of Toronto March 24, 2002 Abstract We study the development from Einstein s relativistic

### Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Lecture 4. Quantum Electro-Dynamics & Feynman Diagrams. Antimatter. Virtual Particles. Yukawa Potential for QED

Ψ e (r, t) exp i/ (E)(t) (p) (r) Subatomic Physics: Particle Physics Lecture Quantum ElectroDynamics & Feynman Diagrams Antimatter Feynman Diagram and Feynman Rules Quantum description of electromagnetism

### P410M: Relativistic Quantum Fields

P410M: Relativistic Quantum Fields Lecturer: Location: Recommended Texts: Dr. D.J. Miller Room 535, Kelvin Building d.miller@physics.gla.ac.uk 220a, Kelvin Building An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

### Pitfalls for emergent gravity: an outsider s view Steve Carlip U.C. Davis

Pitfalls for emergent gravity: an outsider s view Steve Carlip U.C. Davis Gravity as thermodynamics Trieste September 2011 Emergent gravity has become pretty popular lately To summarize, AdS/CFT duality

### PHYS 1624 University Physics I. PHYS 2644 University Physics II

PHYS 1624 Physics I An introduction to mechanics, heat, and wave motion. This is a calculus- based course for Scientists and Engineers. 4 hours (3 lecture/3 lab) Prerequisites: Credit for MATH 2413 (Calculus

### arxiv:hep-ph/0410120v2 2 Nov 2004

Photon deflection by a Coulomb field in noncommutative QED C. A. de S. Pires Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58059-970, João Pessoa - PB, Brazil. Abstract arxiv:hep-ph/0410120v2

### PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

PHY464 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 4 Practice Test 3 November, 4 These problems are similar but not identical to the actual test. One or two parts will actually show up.. Short answer. (a) Recall

### Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

R. P. Feynman, Rev. of Mod. Phys., 20, 367 1948 Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics R.P. Feynman Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Reprinted in Quantum Electrodynamics, edited

### Module -1: Quantum Mechanics - 2

Quantum Mechanics - Assignment Question: Module -1 Quantum Mechanics Module -1: Quantum Mechanics - 01. (a) What do you mean by wave function? Explain its physical interpretation. Write the normalization

### AMPLIFICATION OF ATOMIC WAVES BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF ATOMS. Christian J. Borde

AMPLIFIATION OF ATOMI WAVES BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF ATOMS hristian J. Borde Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, NRS/URA 8, Universite Paris-Nord, Villetaneuse, France. INTRODUTION: The recent development

### 1 Scalars, Vectors and Tensors

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, MADRAS PH350 Classical Physics Handout 1 8.8.2009 1 Scalars, Vectors and Tensors In physics, we are interested in obtaining laws (in the form of mathematical

### 8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Problem Set 5

8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology Tuesday March 5 Problem Set 5 Due Tuesday March 12 at 11.00AM Assigned Reading: E&R 6 9, App-I Li. 7 1 4 Ga. 4 7, 6 1,2

### We can represent the eigenstates for angular momentum of a spin-1/2 particle along each of the three spatial axes with column vectors: 1 +y =

Chapter 0 Pauli Spin Matrices We can represent the eigenstates for angular momentum of a spin-/ particle along each of the three spatial axes with column vectors: +z z [ ] 0 [ ] 0 +y y [ ] / i/ [ ] i/

### (Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7)

Chapter 4. Lagrangian Dynamics (Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7 4.1 Important Notes on Notation In this chapter, unless otherwise stated, the following

### Theory of electrons and positrons

P AUL A. M. DIRAC Theory of electrons and positrons Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1933 Matter has been found by experimental physicists to be made up of small particles of various kinds, the particles of

### Basic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Basic Quantum Mechanics Prof. Ajoy Ghatak Department of Physics. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi Module No. # 02 Simple Solutions of the 1 Dimensional Schrodinger Equation Lecture No. # 7. The Free

### Lecture L19 - Vibration, Normal Modes, Natural Frequencies, Instability

S. Widnall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2009 Version 1.0 Lecture L19 - Vibration, Normal Modes, Natural Frequencies, Instability Vibration, Instability An important class of problems in dynamics concerns the free

### The Radiation Theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman

F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 75, 486 1949 The Radiation Theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman F.J. Dyson Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey (Received October 6, 1948) Reprinted in Quantum

### 1. Coordinates (x, t) in one frame are related to coordinates (x, t ) in another frame by the Lorentz transformation formulas.

Physics 00 Problem Set 7 Solution Quick overview: Although relativity can be a little bewildering, this problem set uses just a few ideas over and over again, namely. Coordinates x, t in one frame are

### Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus n-dimensional Euclidean Space and Matrices Definition of n space As was learned in Math b, a point in Euclidean three space can be thought of

### Let s first see how precession works in quantitative detail. The system is illustrated below: ...

lecture 20 Topics: Precession of tops Nutation Vectors in the body frame The free symmetric top in the body frame Euler s equations The free symmetric top ala Euler s The tennis racket theorem As you know,

### Specific Intensity. I ν =

Specific Intensity Initial question: A number of active galactic nuclei display jets, that is, long, nearly linear, structures that can extend for hundreds of kiloparsecs. Many have two oppositely-directed

### Notes on Quantum Mechanics. Finn Ravndal Institute of Physics University of Oslo, Norway

Notes on Quantum Mechanics Finn Ravndal Institute of Physics University of Oslo, Norway e-mail: finnr@fys.uio.no v.4: December, 2006 2 Contents 1 Linear vector spaces 7 1.1 Real vector spaces...............................

### 1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state

TEORETISK FYSIK, KTH TENTAMEN I KVANTMEKANIK FÖRDJUPNINGSKURS EXAMINATION IN ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHAN- ICS Kvantmekanik fördjupningskurs SI38 för F4 Thursday December, 7, 8. 13. Write on each page: Name,

### State of Stress at Point

State of Stress at Point Einstein Notation The basic idea of Einstein notation is that a covector and a vector can form a scalar: This is typically written as an explicit sum: According to this convention,

### Lecture-XXIV. Quantum Mechanics Expectation values and uncertainty

Lecture-XXIV Quantum Mechanics Expectation values and uncertainty Expectation values We are looking for expectation values of position and momentum knowing the state of the particle, i,e., the wave function

### PX408: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

January 2016 PX408: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Tim Gershon (T.J.Gershon@warwick.ac.uk) Handout 1: Revision & Notation Relativistic quantum mechanics, as its name implies, can be thought of as the bringing

### Perpetual motion and driven dynamics of a mobile impurity in a quantum fluid

and driven dynamics of a mobile impurity in a quantum fluid Oleg Lychkovskiy Russian Quantum Center Seminaire du LPTMS, 01.12.2015 Seminaire du LPTMS, 01.12.2015 1 / Plan of the talk 1 Perpetual motion

### Lecture 22 Relevant sections in text: 3.1, 3.2. Rotations in quantum mechanics

Lecture Relevant sections in text: 3.1, 3. Rotations in quantum mechanics Now we will discuss what the preceding considerations have to do with quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics transformations in

### Introduces the bra and ket notation and gives some examples of its use.

Chapter 7 ket and bra notation Introduces the bra and ket notation and gives some examples of its use. When you change the description of the world from the inutitive and everyday classical mechanics to

### Rutgers - Physics Graduate Qualifying Exam Quantum Mechanics: September 1, 2006

Rutgers - Physics Graduate Qualifying Exam Quantum Mechanics: September 1, 2006 QA J is an angular momentum vector with components J x, J y, J z. A quantum mechanical state is an eigenfunction of J 2 J

### DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHYSICS The Doctor of Philosophy in Physics program is designed to provide students with advanced graduate training in physics, which will prepare them for scientific careers in

### x1 x 2 x 3 y 1 y 2 y 3 x 1 y 2 x 2 y 1 0.

Cross product 1 Chapter 7 Cross product We are getting ready to study integration in several variables. Until now we have been doing only differential calculus. One outcome of this study will be our ability

### 6. Quantum Electrodynamics

6. Quantum Electrodynamics In this section we finally get to quantum electrodynamics QED), the theory of light interacting with charged matter. Our path to quantization will be as before: we start with

### ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS GABRIEL NAGY Mathematics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824. SEPTEMBER 4, 25 Summary. This is an introduction to ordinary differential equations.

### Laws of Motion and Conservation Laws

Laws of Motion and Conservation Laws The first astrophysics we ll consider will be gravity, which we ll address in the next class. First, though, we need to set the stage by talking about some of the basic

### CHAPTER 16: Quantum Mechanics and the Hydrogen Atom

CHAPTER 16: Quantum Mechanics and the Hydrogen Atom Waves and Light Paradoxes in Classical Physics Planck, Einstein, and Bohr Waves, Particles, and the Schrödinger equation The Hydrogen Atom Questions

### arxiv:physics/0004029v1 [physics.ed-ph] 14 Apr 2000

arxiv:physics/0004029v1 [physics.ed-ph] 14 Apr 2000 Lagrangians and Hamiltonians for High School Students John W. Norbury Physics Department and Center for Science Education, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,

### arxiv:physics/0106088v1 [physics.ed-ph] 27 Jun 2001

Introducing Time Dependence into the Static Maxwell Equations arxiv:physics/0106088v1 [physics.ed-ph] 27 Jun 2001 Avraham Gal Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

### PS 320 Classical Mechanics Embry-Riddle University Spring 2010

PS 320 Classical Mechanics Embry-Riddle University Spring 2010 Instructor: M. Anthony Reynolds email: reynodb2@erau.edu web: http://faculty.erau.edu/reynolds/ps320 (or Blackboard) phone: (386) 226-7752

### Additional Topics in Linear Algebra Supplementary Material for Math 540. Joseph H. Silverman

Additional Topics in Linear Algebra Supplementary Material for Math 540 Joseph H Silverman E-mail address: jhs@mathbrownedu Mathematics Department, Box 1917 Brown University, Providence, RI 02912 USA Contents

### Basic Concepts in Nuclear Physics

Basic Concepts in Nuclear Physics Paolo Finelli Corso di Teoria delle Forze Nucleari 2011 Literature/Bibliography Some useful texts are available at the Library: Wong, Nuclear Physics Krane, Introductory

### Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH

W. Greiner 1. Reinhardt FIELD QUANTIZATION Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH Greiner Quantum Mechanics An Introduction 3rd Edition Greiner Quantum Mechanics Special Chapters Greiner. MUller Quantum

### The Variational Principle, from Fermat to Feynman. Nick Sheridan

The Variational Principle, from Fermat to Feynman Nick Sheridan 1662: Fermat points out that light always follows the path between two points that takes least time. This explains the laws of reflection

### Quantum Time: Formalism and Applications

Quantum Time: Formalism and Applications Submitted in partial fulfillment of honors requirements for the Department of Physics and Astronomy, Franklin and Marshall College, by Yuan Gao Professor Calvin

### Write your CANDIDATE NUMBER clearly on each of the THREE answer books provided. Hand in THREE answer books even if they have not all been used.

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON BSc/MSci EXAMINATION June 2007 for Internal Students of Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine This paper is also taken for the relevant Examination for the Associateship

### Chapter 7. Lyapunov Exponents. 7.1 Maps

Chapter 7 Lyapunov Exponents Lyapunov exponents tell us the rate of divergence of nearby trajectories a key component of chaotic dynamics. For one dimensional maps the exponent is simply the average

### MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

MATH 45, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS. Exercise. a Is the operator L defined on smooth functions of x, y by L u := u xx + cosu linear? b Does the answer change if we replace the operator L by the operator

### Eðlisfræði 2, vor 2007

[ Assignment View ] [ Print ] Eðlisfræði 2, vor 2007 30. Inductance Assignment is due at 2:00am on Wednesday, March 14, 2007 Credit for problems submitted late will decrease to 0% after the deadline has

### Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions

Chapter 6 Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions Facts that are recalled in the problems wt) = ut) + 1 c A 1 s ] R c t s)) hws) + Ks r)wr)dr ds. 6.1) w = w +

### Gravity and running coupling constants

Gravity and running coupling constants 1) Motivation and history 2) Brief review of running couplings 3) Gravity as an effective field theory 4) Running couplings in effective field theory 5) Summary 6)

### Second postulate of Quantum mechanics: If a system is in a quantum state represented by a wavefunction ψ, then 2

. POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. Introducing the state function Quantum physicists are interested in all kinds of physical systems (photons, conduction electrons in metals and semiconductors, atoms,

### Gravitational self-force in the ultra-relativistic regime Chad Galley, California Institute of Technology

Gravitational self-force in the ultra-relativistic regime Chad Galley, California Institute of Technology with Rafael Porto (IAS) arxiv: 1302.4486 v2 soon! (with details) Capra16; Dublin, Ireland; July