Continuous time meanvariance portfolio optimization through the mean field approach


 Liliana Dalton
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Continuous time meanvariance portfolio optimization through the mean field approach Markus Fischer Giulia Livieri January 3, 214; revised April 2, 215 Abstract A simple meanvariance portfolio optimization problem in continuous time is solved using the mean field approach. In this approach, the original optimal control problem, which is time inconsistent, is viewed as the McKeanVlasov limit of a family of controlled manycomponent weakly interacting systems. The prelimit problems are solved by dynamic programming, and the solution to the original problem is obtained by passage to the limit. 21 AMS subect classifications: 91G1, 49L2; 82C22, 6H1. Key words and phrases: Portfolio optimization, meanvariance criterion, optimal control, time inconsistency, dynamic programming, McKeanVlasov limit, law of large numbers. 1 Introduction In this paper, we study and solve a meanvariance portfolio optimization problem in continuous time using the mean field approach introduced in the context of discrete time meanvariance problems by Ankirchner and Dermoune [211]. Department of Mathematics, University of Padua, via Trieste 63, Padova, Italy. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, Pisa, Italy. 1
2 The problem of meanvariance portfolio optimization goes back, at least, to Markowitz [1952], who considered a single period one time step model. The model allows investors to be risk averse. Investment decisions are therefore made following two different obectives: to maximize expected return and to minimize financial risk. The two conflicting obectives can be combined; decisions are made so as to maximize a difference between expectation and variance of the random quantity representing wealth at terminal time. In a multiperiod framework discrete or continuous time models, this kind of optimization problem is time inconsistent in the sense that an investment strategy that is optimal over the entire time interval need not be optimal over subintervals. As a consequence, Bellman s Principle of Dynamic Programming does not hold for the underlying control problem. Various approaches to multiperiod meanvariance portfolio optimization have been explored; here, we mention four different approaches from the mathematically oriented literature. The first approach, due to Li and Ng [2] in a discrete time setting, works by embedding the time inconsistent meanvariance optimization problem into a oneparameter family of standard timeconsistent optimal control problems. By solving these problems for each value of the parameter and then choosing the right parameter value according to a compatibility constraint, one can solve the original problem. This technique is extended to continuous time models in Zhou and Li [2]. A different approach is based on a game theoretic interpretation of time inconsistent optimal control problems. Time inconsistency is interpreted in terms of changes in agents preferences, and an optimal control problem is viewed as a game where the players are the future incarnations of their own preferences. Solutions of the optimization problem are then defined in terms of subgame perfect Nash equilibria; see Börk and Murgoci [21] and the references therein. The framework is used in Börk et al. [214] to solve a continuous time meanvariance portfolio optimization problems with riskaversion parameter that may depend on current wealth. A third approach starts from the observation that dynamic meanvariance optimization problems can be seen as stochastic optimal control problems of McKeanVlasov or mean field type [for instance Carmona et al., 213]. For this class of control problems, the coefficients of the costs and dynamics may depend on the law of the controlled state process. As a consequence, 2
3 the cost functional may be nonlinear with respect to the oint law of the state and control process. In the context of meanvariance optimization, the coefficients of the controlled dynamics have standard form, while the cost or gain functional is a quadratic polynomial of the expected value of the state process; it is therefore nonlinear as a functional of the law of the state process. The connection between meanvariance optimization and control of McKeanVlasov type has been exploited in Andersson and Dehiche [211]. There, the authors derive a version of the stochastic Pontryagin maximum principle for continuous time optimal control problems of McKeanVlasov type. The maximum principle is then used to obtain the optimal control for the meanvariance problem solved in Zhou and Li [2]. The Pontryagin maximum principle for control problems of McKeanVlasov type has also been studied in Buckdahn et al. [211], where a necessary condition for optimality is derived provided that the nonlinear dependence on the law of the state process can be expressed through a function of its expected value; in Carmona and Delarue [213], the authors establish a necessary as well as a sufficient condition for optimality for systems with general dependence on the law of the state process, using a particular notion of differentiability for functions defined on a space of probability measures. The work by Ankirchner and Dermoune [211], who treat the meanvariance portfolio optimization problem in discrete time, also builds on the connection with McKeanVlasov control. Those authors, in order to circumvent the difficulties arising from time inconsistency, interpret the original control problem as the McKeanVlasov limit of a family of controlled weakly interacting systems where interaction through the empirical measure appears only in the gain functional, while each component market clone follows the same dynamics as that of the original controlled system. The approximate Kcomponent control problem has the portfolio mean and portfolio variance replaced with their empirical counterparts, and dynamic programming can be used to determine the value function and optimal strategy. The original optimization problem is then solved by letting the number of components K tend to infinity. The asymptotic connection between systems with measuredependent coefficients and manycomponent or manyparticle weakly interacting systems lies at the heart of the McKeanVlasov theory, and it is well established in the case of uncontrolled systems; see, for instance, McKean [1966] or Sznitman [1991]. 3
4 The Pontryagin principle approach mentioned above works directly with the limit model, that is, with the optimal control problem of McKeanVlasov type. The law of the controlled state process, in particular, appears in both the forward and the adoint equation. This approach is most useful when the convexity assumptions on the costs and the Hamiltonian required by the sufficient optimality condition are in force. This is the case for the problem at hand, which has a linearquadratic structure if one includes the mean of the controlled state process. Still, for general convex models, solving the coupled nonlinear system of forward and backward equation is difficult. The mean field approach in the spirit of Ankirchner and Dermoune [211], on the other hand, is based on the McKeanVlasov limit and the standard theory of dynamic programming. No particular convexity structure is needed. The difficulty lies in finding sufficiently explicit solutions for the prelimit problems. The optimal prelimit strategies, if given in feedback form, should also be regular enough so that the passage to the McKeanVlasov limit can be carried out. Optimal control problems of McKeanVlasov type are related to but different from what is known as mean field games. Mean field games are limit models for symmetric Nplayer games with interaction of mean field type. The optimality criterion for the prelimit models i.e, the Nplayer games is that of a Nash equilibrium. In the mean field limit, one representative player is left, while the behavior of all the other players is represented by a flow of probability measures on state space. For any given flow of measures, one has to solve an optimal control problem, the optimization problem for the representative player. A solution of the mean field game then consists in finding a flow of measures m such that the flow of marginal distributions for the optimally controlled state process of the representative player given m coincides with m. See again Carmona et al. [213] for references and a comparison with optimal control problems of McKeanVlasov type. Both types of problems have been solved rather explicitly for a class of linearquadratic models in Bensoussan et al. [214]; see, in particular, the comparison in Section 6 therein. The aim of this paper is to show that the particle limit approach as introduced by Ankirchner and Dermoune [211] in discrete time can be successfully applied to continuous time models as well. We consider one of the simplest situations, namely a market model with exactly one risky asset and 4
5 one riskfree asset. The riskfree asset is assumed to be constant, which corresponds to zero interest rate, while the evolution of the price of the risky asset is modeled as an arithmetic Brownian motion Bachelier dynamics. The case of a geometric Brownian motion MertonBlackScholes dynamics can be handled by reinterpreting the control processes: instead of controlling the possibly negative number of assets, control is exerted in terms of the market value of the assets. In the situation considered here, we obtain an explicit expression for the optimal investment strategy in feedback form. The result in itself is, of course, not new. It is essentially a special case of the solution obtained by Zhou and Li [2] or Andersson and Dehiche [211]; cf. Remark 3 in Section 4 below. The result could also be derived by time discretization from the solutions of the discretetime problems studied in Ankirchner and Dermoune [211]. Here, however, we rely on dynamic programming in continuous time. For the passage to the McKeanVlasov limit, we use a coupling argument in the spirit of Sznitman [1991]. The contribution of the present paper therefore lies in the fact that we combine standard tools to solve a nonstandard optimization problem, where the methods are suggested by the particle limit interpretation of the problem. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we formulate the meanvariance optimization problem and the corresponding finite horizon optimal control problem. In Section 3, we introduce auxiliary K component Kclone optimal control problems. Those problems, which are of linearquadratic type, are solved explicitly using dynamic programming. In Section 4, we pass to the limit as the number of components or clones or particles K tends to infinity. We obtain a limit feedback strategy and a limit value function, which are shown to yield the solution to the original optimization problem. 2 Original optimization problem We consider a financial market consisting of two assets, one risky for instance, a stock and one nonrisky a bond. For simplicity, we assume that the interest rate for the bond is equal to zero, the bond price therefore constant and, without loss of generality, equal to one. The price of the risky asset, which we denote by S, is assumed to follow an arithmetic Brownian motion or Brownian motion with drift. The process S thus satisfies the 5
6 equation dst = µ dt + σ dw t 1 with deterministic initial condition S = s >. In Eq. 1, µ > is the average rate of return, σ > the volatility, and W t t a standard onedimensional Wiener process defined on a filtered probability space Ω, F, F t, P satisfying the usual hypotheses. Taking the point of view of a small investor, let ut denote the not necessarily integer number of shares of the risky asset he or she holds at any given time t, and let Xt be the value of the corresponding selffinancing portfolio, which consists of the risky and the riskfree asset. The process X then evolves according to dxt = µ utdt + σ utdw t 2 with deterministic initial condition X = x, where x > is the initial capital. There is an implicit constraint on the investment strategy u due to the stochastic environment of the problem, namely, u is allowed to depend on the evolution of the random processes only up to the current time. The strategy u must therefore be nonanticipative, that is, u has to be Ft adapted. Below, we assume that u belongs to HT 2 F t, the space of all realvalued Ft T progressively measurable processes v such that E vt 2 dt <, where T > denotes the finite time horizon and E the expectation with respect to P. As is well known, if no boundedness or integrability conditions were placed on the investment strategies, then any distribution at terminal time could be attained. Our agent wants to choose a strategy u in order to maximize expected return over a fixed time interval [, T ], while trying at the same time to minimize financial risk. Interpreting risk as the variance of the underlying process and switching from gains to be maximized to costs to be minimized, the optimization problem is therefore to minimize Ju =. λ Var XT E XT { u H 2 T Ft, subect to X satisfies Eq. 2 with strategy u and X = x. 3 In 3, λ > is a fixed parameter, the risk aversion parameter. A strategy ū HT 2 F t is called optimal if Jū = inf u H 2 T Ft Ju. A function 6
7 z : [, T ] R R is called an optimal feedback control if the equation Xt = x + µ z s, Xs dt + σ z s, Xs dw t, t [, T ], 4 possesses a unique strong solution X such that ūt, ω. = z t, Xt, ω, t [, T ], ω Ω, defines an optimal strategy, that is, ū HT 2 F t and Jū = inf u H 2 T Ft Ju. The strategy ū will be referred to as the strategy induced by z, and the process X will be referred to as the portfolio process induced by z. Notice that both ū and X depend on z as well as the driving Wiener process. 3 Auxiliary prelimit optimization problems Let K N \ {1}, and let W, {1,..., K}, be K independent standard onedimensional Wiener processes defined on some filtered probability space Ω, F, F t, P. The processes W can be interpreted as independent clones of the Wiener process in 1. For {1,..., K}, define S according to Eq. 1 with W replaced by W. If u is a realvalued F t adapted process, then the value of the agent s portfolio in market clone follows the dynamics dx t = µ u tdt + σ u tdw t. 5 The R K valued process X = X 1,..., X K T we use boldface symbols for K dimensional column vectors thus obeys the stochastic differential equation dxt = µ utdt + σ diag u 1 t,..., u K t dw t, 6 where u = u 1,..., u K T is the agent s investment strategy for the K market clones and W = W 1,..., W K T. Clearly, W is a Kdimensional standard Wiener process. Given a vector v R K, the empirical measure associated with v is the probability measure on the Borel sets of R given by µ K v. = 1 K K δ v, =1 7
8 where δ x denotes Dirac measure concentrated in x R. The empirical mean of a Kdimensional vector is the mean calculated with respect to its empirical measure, which equals the arithmetic mean: emv =. y µ K v dy = 1 K v. R K Similarly, the empirical variance of a Kdimensional vector is the variance from the empirical mean calculated with respect to the empirical measure: emp Varv =. y emv 2 µ K v dy R = 1 K i=1 K v emv 2 =1 = em v 2 emv 2. The square in v 2 is to be understood componentwise, that is, v 2 is the Kdimensional vector v1 2,..., v2 K T. Recall that T is the finite time horizon. In setting up the Kclone optimization problem, it will be convenient to allow the initial time and the initial state to vary. In addition, we adopt the weak formulation of a stochastic control problem, that is, the stochastic basis and the driving noise processes are not fixed but part of the control. To be more precise, let U K be the set of all triples Ω, F, F t, P, W, u such that Ω, F, F t, P is a filtered probability space satisfying the usual hypotheses, W is a K dimensional standard F t Wiener process, and u = u 1,..., u K T is such that u HT 2 F t for every {1,..., K}. With a slight abuse of notation, we will occasionally write u U K instead of Ω, F, F t, P, W, u U K. For t, x [, T ] R K, the Kclone optimization problem is to minimize J K t, x; u =. λ E em XT 2 em XT 2 E em XT subect to { u UK, X solves Eq. 6 with strategy u and Xt = x. The value function associated with 7 is defined as 7 V K t, x. = inf J K t, x; u, t, x [, T ] R K. u U K 8
9 Theorem 1. The value function for the optimization problem 7 is given by V K t, x = 1 1 e µ 4λ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K and the function z K : [, T ] R K R K defined by z K t, x. = µ σ 2 emx x /K yields an optimal feedback control. emx+λe µ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K em x 2 emx 2, 2λ e µ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K, {1,..., K}, Proof. The cost functional J K is linearquadratic in the state vector XT. To be more precise, define a Kdimensional vector c and a K K symmetric matrix G by K Then c =. 1 1 K., 1 G. = 2λ K 2 1 K K K 1 1 J K t, x; u = E GXT, XT + c, XT. 2 The controlled dynamics, which are given by Eq. 6, can be rewritten as dxt = b t, Xt, ut dt + Σ t, Xt, ut dw t with functions b: [, R K R K R K, Σ: [, R K R K R K K defined as b t, x, γ. = µ γ, Σ i t, x, γ. = σ γ δ i, i, {1,..., K}. The control problem 7 is thus of the linearquadratic type i.e., linearaffine dynamics, linearquadratic costs; its generalized Hamiltonian H is given by H t, x, γ, p, P. = K =1 9 µ p γ + σ2 2 P γ 2.
10 By the principle of dynamic programming, the value function should solve at least in the sense of viscosity solutions the HamiltonJacobiBellman terminal value problem { t v inf γ R K H t, x, γ, x v, Dxxv 2 = if t, x [, T R K, vt, x = 1 2 Gx, x + c, x if t = T, x 8 RK. The static optimization problem in 8 can be solved explicitly whenever P has nonzero diagonal entries. In fact, for every t, x, p [, T ] R K R K, every symmetric K K matrix P = P i with nonzero diagonal entries, argmin γ R K H t, x, γ, p, P = µ σ 2 p 1 P 11,..., µ σ 2 p K P KK T. 9 By a standard verification theorem [for instance, Theorem III.8.1 in Fleming and Soner, 26, p. 135], if v is a classical solution of 8, that is, v is in C 1,2 [, T ] R K, satisfies 8 in the sense of classical calculus, and v as well as its first and second order partial derivatives are of at most polynomial growth, then v coincides with the value function of the optimization problem 7. In view of the form of the controlled dynamics linear in the control, no explicit state dependency, the linearquadratic terminal costs, zero running costs, and the finite time horizon T, a good guess for v : [, T ] R K R K is vt, x = ft + e βt t c, x + eαt t 2 Gx, x for some constants α, β [, and some function f C 1 [, T ] such that ft =. With this ansatz, v is in C 1,2 [, T ] R K and its Hessian D 2 xxv always has nonzero diagonal entries. Plugging v into 8, and using 9, we find the unknown parameters α, β, and f according to α = µ2 K 1 σ 2, β =, ft = 1 e µ K 1 4λ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K, t [, T ]. With this choice of the parameters, vt, x = 1 1 e µ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K emx + λe µ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K em x 2 emx 2, 4λ which, by the verification theorem cited above, is equal to the value function of control problem 7. Calculating the derivatives x vt, x, D 2 xxvt, x 1
11 with the above choice of parameters and plugging them into 9 yields the feedback control z K. Notice that z K is Lipschitz continuous in the state vector x so that the equation dxt = µ z K t, Xt dt + σ diag z K 1 t, Xt,..., z K K t, Xt dw t, possesses a unique Markovian solution given any deterministic initial condition. It follows [cf. Fleming and Soner, 26, p. 136] that z K is an optimal feedback control. Since the argmin in 9 is unique, the optimal feedback control z K is unique. The corresponding optimal strategy for initial condition Xt = x is determined by ut, ω. = z K t, Xt, ω, t t, ω Ω; notice that u U K. Remark 1. In the proof of Theorem 1, we made a linearquadratic ansatz for the function v. The nonstandard part of our guess is the choice of the matrix G for the quadratic form and the vector c for the linear part. The choice of c comes from the symmetry of dynamics and costs with respect to the components of the state vector. Notice that there is no direct interaction between components in the dynamics of the controlled process X. The choice of G is also suggested by the terminal condition of the HJB equation 8 or, equivalently, the terminal costs in the definition of the cost functional J K. Alternatively, though less convincingly, one can obtain a good guess for v by looking at the discrete time situation studied in Ankirchner and Dermoune [211]. 4 Passage to the limit We next show that, by letting the number of clones K tend to infinity, we obtain a feedback control that is optimal for the original optimization problem 3. By Theorem 1, the optimal feedback control for the Kclone optimization problem is given by z K = z K 1,..., z K T K with z K t, x = µ σ 2 emx x /K 2λ e µ 2 T t σ 2 1 1/K. 1 In passing to the limit, it will be convenient to work with a fixed stochastic basis carrying an infinite family of independent onedimensional standard 11
12 Wiener processes. Thus, let Ω, F, F t, P be a filtered probability space satisfying the usual hypotheses and carrying a sequence W N of independent onedimensional F t Wiener processes. Recall that x is the initial state at time zero for the portfolio process of the original problem 3. For K. XK X K K N \ {1}, set x K = x,..., x T R K, and let X K = 1,..., denote the unique strong solution of the system of stochastic differential equations d X K t = µ z K t, X K t dt + σ z K t, X K t dw t, 11 {1,..., K}, with initial condition X K = x K. The process X K has the same distribution as the unique solution to Eq. 6 or the system of equations determined by 5 when feedback control z K is applied and the initial condition is x K at time zero; for the corresponding costs we have λ E em X K T 2 em X K 2 T E em X K T = V K, x K. Define the function z : [, T ] R R by zt, x =. µ σ 2 x + 1 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 T x. 12 The function z will turn out to be an optimal feedback control for the optimization problem of Section 2. Notice that z is Lipschitz continuous in the space variable. For N, let X be the unique strong solution of X t = x + µ z s, X s ds + σ z s, X s dw s. 13 Lemma 1. Define functions m, n: [, T ] R by mt =. x + 1 e µ2 σ 2λ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 T t nt. = x 2 + x λ e µ2 σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 T t + 1 e 2 µ2 4λ 2 σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 2T t. Then the following convergences hold uniformly in t [, T ]: T 12
13 a lim K em X K t = mt in L 2 P; b lim K E em X K 2 t = nt; c for every N, lim K zk t, X K t = zt, X t, lim K Moreover, for every N, every t [, T ], E X t = mt, E X t 2 = nt. X K t = X t in L 2 P. Proof. For K N \ {1}, t [, T ], set Y K t =. em X K t, L K t =. em X K t 2. µ, C K = σ 2 1 1/K, g K t =. 1 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 t 1 1/K, gt =. 1 2λ e µ 2 Clearly, C K µ/σ 2, g K t gt uniformly in t [, T ] as K. By definition, Y K t = 1 K K K =1 X t, L K t = 1 K K K =1 X t 2. Notice that mt = x + gt gt t. σ 2 t. nt = mt 2 gt t/2 2 gt t 2 + 2gT gt t. In view of 1 and 11, Y K solves the stochastic differential equation dy K t = µ C K g K T t dt + 1 K σ C K Y K t K =1 K X t + g K T t dw t 14 with initial condition Y K = x, while L K solves dl K t = 2µ C K Y K t 2 L K t + Y K t g K T t dt + σ 2 CK 2 L K t Y K t 2 + g K T t 2 dt + 1 K K 2σ C K =1 XK t Y K t K X t + g K T t dw t 15 13
14 with initial condition L K = x 2. By the independence of the Wiener processes W 1,..., W K, the BurkholderDavisGundy inequality, and Gronwall s, Y K, L K possess moments of any polynomial or lemma, XK 1,..., der; moreover, sup sup K N s [,T ] X K K E L K s = sup sup K N s [,T ] E 1 K K =1 X K In order to prove the limit in a, it is enough to show that lim sup K sup t [,T ] Y E K t mt 2. Integration of Eq. 14 yields, for every t [, T ], Y K t = x + g K T g K T t + 1 K σ C K Y K s K =1 s < K X s + g K T s dw s. Using Itô s isometry and the independence of the Wiener processes, one finds that Y E K t mt 2 2 g K T gt + gt t g K T t 2 2µ 2 K 2 t + σ 2 K 1 2 E Y K K s X s + g K T s dw s =1 = 2 g K T gt + gt t g K T t 2 + 2µ 2 σ 2 K 1 2 K =1 E Y K s K 2 X s + g K T s ds 2 g K T gt + gt t g K T t 2 16T µ2 K 2 + K σ 2 K 1 2 g K T 2 + sup E XK s. s [,T ] =1 14
15 Since g K t gt uniformly and thanks to 16, lim sup K lim sup K sup t [,T ] Y E K t mt 2 16T µ 2 K σ 2 K 1 2 g K T 2 + sup s [,T ] E 1 K K 2 XK s =. =1 In order to prove b, set n K t. = E L K t, t [, T ]. We have to show that lim K n K t = nt for every t [, T ]. Integration of Eq. 15 yields, for t [, T ], L K t = x 2 + 2µ C K σ 2 CK 2 Y K s 2 L K s ds + 2µ C K Y K s g K T s ds + σ 2 CK K K =1 2σ C K XK s Y K s g K T s 2 ds K X s + g K T s dw s. The stochastic integral in the above display is a true martingale thanks to the L p integrability of the components of X K. Using the FubiniTonelli theorem, it follows that n K satisfies the integral equation n K t = x 2 + 2µ C K σ 2 CK 2 E Y K s 2 n K s ds + 2µ C K E Y K s g K T s ds + σ 2 CK 2 g K T s 2 ds Notice that lim K σ 2 C 2 K = µ2 σ 2 = lim K µ C K. Let n denote the unique solution over [, T ] of the integral equation nt = x 2 + µ2 σ 2 ms + gt s 2 ds µ2 σ 2 nsds. 15
16 By part a, E Y K s ms and E Y K s 2 ms 2 as K, uniformly in s [, T ]. It follows that lim K n K t = nt, uniformly in t [, T ]. Since ms + gt s = x + 1 over [, T ] of the integral equation x + 1 nt = x 2 + µ2 σ 2 t d µ2 nt = dt σ 2 2λ e µ 2 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 T, n is the unique solution σ 2 T 2 µ2 σ 2 nsds or, equivalently, the unique solution over [, T ] of the differential equation x σ 2 T µ2 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 nt with initial condition n = x 2. That solution is given by nt = e µ2 σ 2 t x 2 + µ2 x t σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 s ds = x 2 + x λ σ 2 2λ e µ 2 e µ2 σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 T t + 1 4λ 2 e 2 µ2 σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 2T t. Therefore, lim K n K t = nt = nt, uniformly in t [, T ]. For part c, fix N, and let X be the unique solution of Eq. 13 with X = x and driving Wiener process W. In order to prove c, it is enough K to show that lim sup K sup t [,T ] E z t, X K t z t, X t 2 X K, and analogously for t and X t. For t [, T ], K N, set R K t =. µ σ 2 em X K t + g K T t µ 1 1/K σ 2 x + gt µ K + X σ 2 t. K 1 µ Clearly, lim K σ 2 1 1/K = µ. Thanks to part a, σ 2 em X K t + g K T t K mt + gt t = x + gt in L 2 P, uniformly in t [, T ]. By the symmetry of Eq. 11 and the initial condition, XK K 1 t,..., X K t have the same distribution for every t [, T ]. Estimate 16 therefore implies that sup sup E XK t 2 <. K N t [,T ] 16
17 It follows that Now, for every t [, T ], z K sup E R K t 2 K. t [,T ] t, X K t z t, X t 2 µ = XK σ 2 t X t + R K t 2 2 µ2 σ 4 XK t X t R K t 2. In view of Eq. 11 and Eq. 13, respectively, using Hölder s inequality, Itô s isometry, and the FubiniTonelli theorem, we have E XK t X t 2 2µ 2 E z K s, X K s z s, X s 2 ds + 2σ 2 E z K s, X K s z s, X s 2 dw s 2 µ 2 T + σ 2 K E z It follows that, for every t [, T ], K E z t, X K t z t, X t 2 µ 4 4 σ 4 T + µ2 K σ 2 E z R K s sup E s [,T ] Therefore, by Gronwall s lemma, sup E t [,T ] z K t, X K t z t, X t 2 s, X K s z s, X s 2 ds. s, X K s z s, X s 2 ds 2 sup E R K t 2 e 4 µ 4 σ 4 T + µ2 σ 2 T. t [,T ] 17
18 Since sup t [,T ] E R K t 2 as K, we have lim sup K sup t [,T ] K E z t, X K t z t, X t 2. Similarly, for every t [, T ], E XK t X t 2 µ 4 4 σ 4 T + µ2 σ 2 E XK s X s 2 ds + 4T µ 2 T + σ 2 sup E R K s 2. s [,T ] Thus, again by Gronwall s lemma and since sup t [,T ] E R K t 2, lim sup K sup t [,T ] E XK t X t 2. The last part of the assertion is now a consequence of parts a, b, c, and the fact that X K has identically distributed components for every K N. Alternatively, the first and second moments of X t can be calculated directly from Eq. 13 and 12, the definition of z. Theorem 2. The function zt, x =. µ σ 2 x + 1 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 T x, t, x [, T ] R, yields an optimal feedback control for the original optimization problem 3, and the minimal costs are given by λ Var 1 XT E XT = 1 e µ2 σ 4λ 2 T x, where X is the portfolio process induced by z. Before giving the proof of Theorem 2, we make a few remarks regarding the optimal feedback control z. Remark 2. The optimal feedback control z is affinelinear in the current state x, does not depend on the current time t, while it depends on the time horizon T as well as the initial state x. This last dependence is due to 18
19 the nonlinear nature of the cost functional, which makes the optimization problem inconsistent in time. The fact that z does not depend on the current time t is something of a coincidence, due to our choice of interest rates equal to zero. Recall that, by Lemma 1, mt. = x + 1 2λ e µ2 σ 2 T e µ2 σ 2 T t, is the L 2 limit of the empirical means of the Kclone optimization problem. For the optimal strategy z, we can therefore write zt, x = µ σ 2 mt + 1 2λ e µ 2 σ 2 T t x. 17 This expression coincides, in the limit as K, with the expression for the optimal feedback strategy z K established in Theorem 1 for the th component of the Kclone optimization problem. In 17, z apparently depends on current time, but this dependence cancels out when we plug in the expression for mt. On the other hand, z truly depends through m on the initial state x, since m = x. Also notice that mt = E Xt, where X is the optimal portfolio process, the one induced by z. Remark 3. Expression 17 coincides with the optimal feedback strategy found at the end of Section 5 of Andersson and Dehiche [211] in the special case of zero interest rate ρ t, constant volatility σ t σ, and constant average rate of return α t µ; our risk aversion parameter λ corresponds to γ/2 there. In Section 5 of Andersson and Dehiche [211], the price of the risky asset follows a geometric Brownian motion, not an arithmetic as here, but the resulting meanvariance optimization problem, including the dynamics for the portfolio process, is the same as in our case. The difference lies entirely in the different interpretation of the investment strategies, namely as control expressed in terms of realvalued number of assets versus market value of assets. Remark 4. The solution to the meanvariance optimization problem seen above is known as precommitment solution. This refers to the fact that we solve the optimization problem exclusively from the point of view of the agent s state at time zero, ignoring intermediate times. The gametheoretic approach leads to a different interpretation of the optimization problem and to 19
Optimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves
Optimal proportional reinsurance and dividend payout for insurance companies with switching reserves Abstract: This paper presents a model for an insurance company that controls its risk and dividend
More informationCOMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS
COMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS NICOLE BÄUERLE AND STEFANIE GRETHER Abstract. In this short note we prove a conjecture posed in Cui et al. 2012): Dynamic meanvariance problems in
More informationA NOTE ON AN LQG REGULATOR WITH MARKOVIAN SWITCHING AND PATHWISE AVERAGE COST*
A NOTE ON AN LQG REGULATOR WITH MARKOVIAN SWITCHING AND PATHWISE AVERAGE COST* Mrinal K. Ghosh, Aristotle Arapostathis and Steven I. Marcus Abstract. We study a linear system with a Markovian switching
More informationEquilibrium investment strategy for definedcontribution pension schemes with generalized meanvariance criterion and mortality risk
Equilibrium investment strategy for definedcontribution pension schemes with generalized meanvariance criterion and mortality risk Huiling Wu, Yan Zeng July 4, 2015 Outline Introduction Problem formulation
More informationARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS. Denis Bell. University of North Florida
ARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS Denis Bell University of North Florida Modelling Stock Prices Example American Express In mathematical finance, it is customary to model a stock price by an (Ito) stochatic
More information4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: SinglePeriod Market
More informationSensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes
Sensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes Dmitry Kramkov, Carnegie Mellon University Based on a paper with Mihai Sirbu from Columbia University Math Finance Seminar,
More informationMoreover, under the risk neutral measure, it must be the case that (5) r t = µ t.
LECTURE 7: BLACK SCHOLES THEORY 1. Introduction: The Black Scholes Model In 1973 Fisher Black and Myron Scholes ushered in the modern era of derivative securities with a seminal paper 1 on the pricing
More informationThe Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models
780 w Interest Rate Models The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates Before discussing how a bond marketmaker would deltahedge, we first need to specify how bonds behave. Suppose we try to model a zerocoupon
More informationChapter 2: Binomial Methods and the BlackScholes Formula
Chapter 2: Binomial Methods and the BlackScholes Formula 2.1 Binomial Trees We consider a financial market consisting of a bond B t = B(t), a stock S t = S(t), and a calloption C t = C(t), where the
More informationOPTIMAL TIMING OF THE ANNUITY PURCHASES: A
OPTIMAL TIMING OF THE ANNUITY PURCHASES: A COMBINED STOCHASTIC CONTROL AND OPTIMAL STOPPING PROBLEM Gabriele Stabile 1 1 Dipartimento di Matematica per le Dec. Econ. Finanz. e Assic., Facoltà di Economia
More informationStocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing
Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing Ralf Korn 1 and L. C. G. Rogers 2 Abstract In the BlackScholes model, any dividends on stocks are paid continuously, but in reality dividends
More informationBayesian Adaptive Trading with a Daily Cycle
Bayesian Adaptive Trading with a Daily Cycle Robert Almgren and Julian Lorenz July 28, 26 Abstract Standard models of algorithmic trading neglect the presence of a daily cycle. We construct a model in
More informationGoal Problems in Gambling and Game Theory. Bill Sudderth. School of Statistics University of Minnesota
Goal Problems in Gambling and Game Theory Bill Sudderth School of Statistics University of Minnesota 1 Three problems Maximizing the probability of reaching a goal. Maximizing the probability of reaching
More informationQuasistatic evolution and congested transport
Quasistatic evolution and congested transport Inwon Kim Joint with Damon Alexander, Katy Craig and Yao Yao UCLA, UW Madison Hard congestion in crowd motion The following crowd motion model is proposed
More informationLECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS
LECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS 1. Introduction All of the options that we have considered thus far have been of the European variety: exercise is permitted only at the termination of the contract. These
More informationMathematical Finance
Mathematical Finance Option Pricing under the RiskNeutral Measure Cory Barnes Department of Mathematics University of Washington June 11, 2013 Outline 1 Probability Background 2 Black Scholes for European
More informationAsian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market
Sun and Chen Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications (215) 3:11 DOI 1.1186/s446715357 RESEARCH Open Access Asian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market Jiajun Sun 1 and Xiaowei
More informationAmerican Option Pricing with Transaction Costs
American Option Pricing with Transaction Costs Valeri. I. Zakamouline Department of Finance and Management Science Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration Helleveien 30, 5045 Bergen,
More informationECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE
ECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE YUAN TIAN This synopsis is designed merely for keep a record of the materials covered in lectures. Please refer to your own lecture notes for all proofs.
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN. E.V. Grigorieva. E.N. Khailov
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Supplement Volume 2005 pp. 345 354 OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN E.V. Grigorieva Department of Mathematics
More informationSome Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory
Journal of Uncertain Systems Vol.3, No.1, pp.310, 2009 Online at: www.jus.org.uk Some Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory aoding Liu Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences
More informationSimple Arbitrage. Motivated by and partly based on a joint work with T. Sottinen and E. Valkeila. Christian Bender. Saarland University
Simple Arbitrage Motivated by and partly based on a joint work with T. Sottinen and E. Valkeila Saarland University December, 8, 2011 Problem Setting Financial market with two assets (for simplicity) on
More informationLecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.243j (Fall 2003): DYNAMICS OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Lecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
More informationStephane Crepey. Financial Modeling. A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective. 4y Springer
Stephane Crepey Financial Modeling A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective 4y Springer Part I An Introductory Course in Stochastic Processes 1 Some Classes of DiscreteTime Stochastic
More informationFuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability
Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, 1(2) (2001) 111 119 Fuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability V. Lakshmikantham 1 and S. Leela 2 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida
More informationQUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS
QUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS L. M. Dieng ( Department of Physics, CUNY/BCC, New York, New York) Abstract: In this work, we expand the idea of Samuelson[3] and Shepp[,5,6] for
More informationOPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS
ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT NR 8904 OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS BY M. VANDEBROEK & J. DHAENE D/1989/2376/5 1 IN A OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS By Martina Vandebroek
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationAn Incomplete Market Approach to Employee Stock Option Valuation
An Incomplete Market Approach to Employee Stock Option Valuation Kamil Kladívko Department of Statistics, University of Economics, Prague Department of Finance, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen Mihail
More informationMath 526: Brownian Motion Notes
Math 526: Brownian Motion Notes Definition. Mike Ludkovski, 27, all rights reserved. A stochastic process (X t ) is called Brownian motion if:. The map t X t (ω) is continuous for every ω. 2. (X t X t
More informationOptimization under uncertainty: modeling and solution methods
Optimization under uncertainty: modeling and solution methods Paolo Brandimarte Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche Politecnico di Torino email: paolo.brandimarte@polito.it URL: http://staff.polito.it/paolo.brandimarte
More informationHydrodynamic Limits of Randomized Load Balancing Networks
Hydrodynamic Limits of Randomized Load Balancing Networks Kavita Ramanan and Mohammadreza Aghajani Brown University Stochastic Networks and Stochastic Geometry a conference in honour of François Baccelli
More information1 Portfolio mean and variance
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman Portfolio mean and variance Here we study the performance of a oneperiod investment X 0 > 0 (dollars) shared among several different assets. Our criterion for measuring
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 51, NO. 7, JULY 2005 2475. G. George Yin, Fellow, IEEE, and Vikram Krishnamurthy, Fellow, IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 51, NO. 7, JULY 2005 2475 LMS Algorithms for Tracking Slow Markov Chains With Applications to Hidden Markov Estimation and Adaptive Multiuser Detection G.
More informationLecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. LogNormal Distribution
Lecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. Logormal Distribution October 4, 200 Limiting Distribution of the Scaled Random Walk Recall that we defined a scaled simple random walk last
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More informationCONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian. Pasquale Candito and Giuseppina D Aguí
Opuscula Math. 34 no. 4 2014 683 690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2014.34.4.683 Opuscula Mathematica CONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian Pasquale
More informationReaching Goals by a Deadline: Digital Options and ContinuousTime Active Portfolio Management
Reaching Goals by a Deadline: Digital Options and ContinuousTime Active Portfolio Management Sad Browne * Columbia University Original: February 18, 1996 This Version: July 9, 1996 Abstract We study a
More informationIn which Financial Markets do Mutual Fund Theorems hold true?
In which Financial Markets do Mutual Fund Theorems hold true? W. Schachermayer M. Sîrbu E. Taflin Abstract The Mutual Fund Theorem (MFT) is considered in a general semimartingale financial market S with
More informationThe BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options
he BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options Paul J Atzberger Comments should be sent to: atzberg@mathucsbedu Introduction In this article we shall discuss the BlackScholesMerton approach to determining
More informationStochastic Inventory Control
Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the
More informationτ θ What is the proper price at time t =0of this option?
Now by Itô s formula But Mu f and u g in Ū. Hence τ θ u(x) =E( Mu(X) ds + u(x(τ θ))) 0 τ θ u(x) E( f(x) ds + g(x(τ θ))) = J x (θ). 0 But since u(x) =J x (θ ), we consequently have u(x) =J x (θ ) = min
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More informationt := maxγ ν subject to ν {0,1,2,...} and f(x c +γ ν d) f(x c )+cγ ν f (x c ;d).
1. Line Search Methods Let f : R n R be given and suppose that x c is our current best estimate of a solution to P min x R nf(x). A standard method for improving the estimate x c is to choose a direction
More informationTaylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 126
Taylor Polynomials and Taylor Series Math 26 In many problems in science and engineering we have a function f(x) which is too complicated to answer the questions we d like to ask. In this chapter, we will
More informationThe integrating factor method (Sect. 2.1).
The integrating factor method (Sect. 2.1). Overview of differential equations. Linear Ordinary Differential Equations. The integrating factor method. Constant coefficients. The Initial Value Problem. Variable
More informationCHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.
CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,
More informationStochastic Modelling and Forecasting
Stochastic Modelling and Forecasting Department of Statistics and Modelling Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow, G1 1XH RSE/NNSFC Workshop on Management Science and Engineering and Public Policy
More informationBinomial lattice model for stock prices
Copyright c 2007 by Karl Sigman Binomial lattice model for stock prices Here we model the price of a stock in discrete time by a Markov chain of the recursive form S n+ S n Y n+, n 0, where the {Y i }
More informationRisk/Arbitrage Strategies: An Application to Stock Option Portfolio Management
Risk/Arbitrage Strategies: An Application to Stock Option Portfolio Management Vincenzo Bochicchio, Niklaus Bühlmann, Stephane Junod and HansFredo List Swiss Reinsurance Company Mythenquai 50/60, CH8022
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closedbook exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationLOGNORMAL MODEL FOR STOCK PRICES
LOGNORMAL MODEL FOR STOCK PRICES MICHAEL J. SHARPE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT, UCSD 1. INTRODUCTION What follows is a simple but important model that will be the basis for a later study of stock prices as
More informationPortfolio Optimization Part 1 Unconstrained Portfolios
Portfolio Optimization Part 1 Unconstrained Portfolios John Norstad jnorstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org September 11, 2002 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract We recapitulate the singleperiod
More informationNotes on BlackScholes Option Pricing Formula
. Notes on BlackScholes Option Pricing Formula by DeXing Guan March 2006 These notes are a brief introduction to the BlackScholes formula, which prices the European call options. The essential reading
More informationSimulating Stochastic Differential Equations
Monte Carlo Simulation: IEOR E473 Fall 24 c 24 by Martin Haugh Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations 1 Brief Review of Stochastic Calculus and Itô s Lemma Let S t be the time t price of a particular
More informationProbability and Statistics
CHAPTER 2: RANDOM VARIABLES AND ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS 2b  0 Probability and Statistics Kristel Van Steen, PhD 2 Montefiore Institute  Systems and Modeling GIGA  Bioinformatics ULg kristel.vansteen@ulg.ac.be
More informationFinitely Additive Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Games. Bill Sudderth University of Minnesota
Finitely Additive Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Games Bill Sudderth University of Minnesota 1 Discounted Dynamic Programming Five ingredients: S, A, r, q, β. S  state space A  set of actions q(
More informationELECE8104 Stochastics models and estimation, Lecture 3b: Linear Estimation in Static Systems
Stochastics models and estimation, Lecture 3b: Linear Estimation in Static Systems Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE) MMSE estimation of Gaussian random vectors Linear MMSE estimator for arbitrarily distributed
More information1 IEOR 4700: Introduction to stochastic integration
Copyright c 7 by Karl Sigman 1 IEOR 47: Introduction to stochastic integration 1.1 RiemannStieltjes integration Recall from calculus how the Riemann integral b a h(t)dt is defined for a continuous function
More informationProperties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO
Properties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO R. L. Johnson and C. J. Neugebauer The main result says that a nonnegative BMOfunction w, whose reciprocal is also in BMO, belongs to p> A p,and
More information1. (First passage/hitting times/gambler s ruin problem:) Suppose that X has a discrete state space and let i be a fixed state. Let
Copyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman 1 Stopping Times 1.1 Stopping Times: Definition Given a stochastic process X = {X n : n 0}, a random time τ is a discrete random variable on the same probability space as
More informationDiusion processes. Olivier Scaillet. University of Geneva and Swiss Finance Institute
Diusion processes Olivier Scaillet University of Geneva and Swiss Finance Institute Outline 1 Brownian motion 2 Itô integral 3 Diusion processes 4 BlackScholes 5 Equity linked life insurance 6 Merton
More informationOptimisation Problems in NonLife Insurance
Frankfurt, 6. Juli 2007 1 The de Finetti Problem The Optimal Strategy De Finetti s Example 2 Minimal Ruin Probabilities The HamiltonJacobiBellman Equation Two Examples 3 Optimal Dividends Dividends in
More informationSensitivity analysis of European options in jumpdiffusion models via the Malliavin calculus on the Wiener space
Sensitivity analysis of European options in jumpdiffusion models via the Malliavin calculus on the Wiener space Virginie Debelley and Nicolas Privault Département de Mathématiques Université de La Rochelle
More informationThe BlackScholes Formula
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 The BlackScholes Formula These notes examine the BlackScholes formula for European options. The BlackScholes formula are complex as they are based on the
More informationLecture. S t = S t δ[s t ].
Lecture In real life the vast majority of all traded options are written on stocks having at least one dividend left before the date of expiration of the option. Thus the study of dividends is important
More informationFACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z
FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization
More informationA PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. In memory of RouHuai Wang
A PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS XAVIER CABRÉ, MANEL SANCHÓN, AND JOEL SPRUCK In memory of RouHuai Wang 1. Introduction In this note we consider semistable
More informationOptimal Investment with Derivative Securities
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Optimal Investment with Derivative Securities Aytaç İlhan 1, Mattias Jonsson 2, Ronnie Sircar 3 1 Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford,
More informationMonte Carlo Methods in Finance
Author: Yiyang Yang Advisor: Pr. Xiaolin Li, Pr. Zari Rachev Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics State University of New York at Stony Brook October 2, 2012 Outline Introduction 1 Introduction
More informationMaster of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions
Master of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions CS 522 Data Mining Computer Science This course provides continued exploration of data mining algorithms. More sophisticated algorithms such as support
More informationMartingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures
IEOR E4706: Financial Engineering: DiscreteTime Asset Pricing Fall 2005 c 2005 by Martin Haugh Martingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures We now apply martingale pricing theory to the
More informationIntroduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems
Introduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems Dmitry Kramkov Carnegie Mellon University Workshop on Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Penn State, May 810, 2015 1 / 24 Outline Financial market
More informationStochastic volatility: option pricing using a multinomial recombining tree
Stochastic volatility: option pricing using a multinomial recombining tree Ionuţ Florescu 1,3 and Frederi G. Viens,4 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point
More informationEssays in Financial Mathematics
Essays in Financial Mathematics Essays in Financial Mathematics Kristoffer Lindensjö Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Ph.D. Stockholm School of Economics, 2013. Dissertation title:
More informationOption Pricing. Chapter 9  Barrier Options  Stefan Ankirchner. University of Bonn. last update: 9th December 2013
Option Pricing Chapter 9  Barrier Options  Stefan Ankirchner University of Bonn last update: 9th December 2013 Stefan Ankirchner Option Pricing 1 Standard barrier option Agenda What is a barrier option?
More informationMath 5311 Gateaux differentials and Frechet derivatives
Math 5311 Gateaux differentials and Frechet derivatives Kevin Long January 26, 2009 1 Differentiation in vector spaces Thus far, we ve developed the theory of minimization without reference to derivatives.
More informationLiquidity costs and market impact for derivatives
Liquidity costs and market impact for derivatives F. Abergel, G. Loeper Statistical modeling, financial data analysis and applications, Istituto Veneto di Scienze Lettere ed Arti. Abergel, G. Loeper Statistical
More informationInner Product Spaces
Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and
More informationLifeinsurancespecific optimal investment: the impact of stochastic interest rate and shortfall constraint
Lifeinsurancespecific optimal investment: the impact of stochastic interest rate and shortfall constraint An Radon Workshop on Financial and Actuarial Mathematics for Young Researchers May 3031 2007,
More informationThe BlackScholes Model
The BlackScholes Model Liuren Wu Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College Options Markets (Hull chapter: 12, 13, 14) Liuren Wu The BlackScholes Model Options Markets 1 / 19 The BlackScholesMerton
More informationThe BlackScholes pricing formulas
The BlackScholes pricing formulas Moty Katzman September 19, 2014 The BlackScholes differential equation Aim: Find a formula for the price of European options on stock. Lemma 6.1: Assume that a stock
More informationNonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion
Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion P. CoolenSchrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK email: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk
More informationForwards, Swaps and Futures
IEOR E4706: Financial Engineering: DiscreteTime Models c 2010 by Martin Haugh Forwards, Swaps and Futures These notes 1 introduce forwards, swaps and futures, and the basic mechanics of their associated
More informationLecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing
Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing Key concept: Ito s lemma Stock Options: A contract giving its holder the right, but not obligation, to trade shares of a common
More informationReview of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology
Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology March 24, 2005 1 Introduction The purchase of an options contract gives the buyer the right to buy call options contract or sell put options contract some
More informationSome ergodic theorems of linear systems of interacting diffusions
Some ergodic theorems of linear systems of interacting diffusions 4], Â_ ŒÆ êæ ÆÆ Nov, 2009, uà ŒÆ liuyong@math.pku.edu.cn yangfx@math.pku.edu.cn 1 1 30 1 The ergodic theory of interacting systems has
More informationCS 522 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options
CS 5 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options 1. Definitions Equity. The common stock of a corporation. Traded on organized exchanges (NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ). A common
More information1 Norms and Vector Spaces
008.10.07.01 1 Norms and Vector Spaces Suppose we have a complex vector space V. A norm is a function f : V R which satisfies (i) f(x) 0 for all x V (ii) f(x + y) f(x) + f(y) for all x,y V (iii) f(λx)
More information3 Introduction to Assessing Risk
3 Introduction to Assessing Risk Important Question. How do we assess the risk an investor faces when choosing among assets? In this discussion we examine how an investor would assess the risk associated
More informationPricing of an Exotic Forward Contract
Pricing of an Exotic Forward Contract Jirô Akahori, Yuji Hishida and Maho Nishida Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University 111 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan Email: {akahori,
More informationAdaptive Arrival Price
Adaptive Arrival Price Julian Lorenz (ETH Zurich, Switzerland) Robert Almgren (Adjunct Professor, New York University) Algorithmic Trading 2008, London 07. 04. 2008 Outline Evolution of algorithmic trading
More information1 Short Introduction to Time Series
ECONOMICS 7344, Spring 202 Bent E. Sørensen January 24, 202 Short Introduction to Time Series A time series is a collection of stochastic variables x,.., x t,.., x T indexed by an integer value t. The
More informationEXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL
EXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL Exit Time problems and Escape from a Potential Well Escape From a Potential Well There are many systems in physics, chemistry and biology that exist
More informationHedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility. Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15
Hedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15 1. Motivation This is a pure jump model and hence avoids the theoretical drawbacks of continuous path models.
More informationBlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing
BlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing By Ivan Karmazin, Jiacong Li 1. Introduction In early 1970s, Black, Scholes and Merton achieved a major breakthrough in pricing of European stock options and there
More informationLecture 13 Linear quadratic Lyapunov theory
EE363 Winter 289 Lecture 13 Linear quadratic Lyapunov theory the Lyapunov equation Lyapunov stability conditions the Lyapunov operator and integral evaluating quadratic integrals analysis of ARE discretetime
More informationarxiv:0706.1300v1 [qfin.pr] 9 Jun 2007
THE QUANTUM BLACKSCHOLES EQUATION LUIGI ACCARDI AND ANDREAS BOUKAS arxiv:0706.1300v1 [qfin.pr] 9 Jun 2007 Abstract. Motivated by the work of Segal and Segal in [16] on the BlackScholes pricing formula
More informationFair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion
Fair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion Torsten Kleinow Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical
More information