Verification of Experimental and Operational Weather Prediction Models March to May 2015
|
|
- Iris Chase
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MET info / Meteorology Verification of Experimental and Operational Weather Prediction Models March to May Bjørg Jenny Kokkvoll Engdahl and Mariken Homleid With contributions from: Anne-Mette Olsen, Vibeke Wauters Thyness, and Magnus Ovhed Photo: Ingrid Våset
2 Contents Models Post processed models HARMONIE, AROME-Norway and AROME-MetCoOp. ALARO- physics AROME physics SURFEX as surface model Data assimilation Surface analysis Upper air analysis Boundaries and initialization of upper air fields Verification measures. Forecasts of continuous variables Forecasts of categorical variables Observations Norway 7. Comments to verification results Pressure and variables at pressure levels Wind Speed m Max Mean Wind Speed m Wind gust Temperature m Post processed temperature m Daily precipitation Eastern Norway 6. Comments to the verification results Pressure Wind Speed m Wind gust Temperature m Post processed temperature m Daily precipitation Western Norway 8 7. Comments to the verification results Pressure Wind Speed m Max Mean Wind Speed m
3 7. Wind gust Temperature m Post processed temperature m Daily precipitation Northern Norway 6 8. Comments to the verification results Pressure Wind Speed m Max Mean Wind Speed m Wind gust Temperature m Post processed temperature m Daily precipitation Long term forecast 9. Comments to the verification results Temperature m Wind Speed m h Precipitation h Precipitation Appendix 69. m Wind speed Temperature m Daily precipitation ii
4 POST PROCESSED MODELS Models The following models are verified in this report. All except EC are or have been running at MET. EC Hirlam (H) Hirlam8 (H8) Global model (IFS) at the. From 6 January resolution T 79 or approximately 6 6 km horizontally. Available resolution for verification at MET is. latitude and longitude. Number of vertical levels increased from L9 to L7 June. Version 7., horizontal resolution defined by a km grid since February 8. Version 7., horizontal resolution defined by a 8 8 km grid since February 8. Harmonie. HARMONIE cycle 6h. with ALARO physics run on a.. km grid from May to January. Harmonie. HARMONIE cycle 6h. with AROME physics run on a.. km grid from May to 6 February. AROME-MetCoOp (AM) HARMONIE cycle 8h. with AROME physics run on a.. km grid on same domain as AROME-Norway; experimental since 9 December. Analysis and lead times of forecasts are denoted by e.g. + UTC which indicates forecast generated at UTC and valid hours later. Post processed models Most of the raw model data are post processed before being published on Yr. The models AM and H8 are statisticly post processed to represent the m max mean wind speed. After post processing, these models are called AM_PP and H8_PP. For m temperature, the raw data is first interpolated to a m grid and then Kalman filtered. These model fields are called AM.KF and H8.KF. The precipitation data is post processed by using a neighbourhood method. Through the method, a median value is obtained. This field, called AM.median is used to determine the precipitation symbol at Yr. For long term forecast, an ensemble of members run at is used to obtain a probabilistic forecast. These fields are called EC_UKAL_KONSENSUS and EC_UKAL_MEDIAN for the consensus and median forecast, respectively. If the probablistic forecast is calibrated before it is published on Yr, it is called EC_KAL_...
5 HARMONIE, AROME-NORWAY AND AROME-METCOOP The deterministic model just called, is also shown in the long term forecast graphs. HARMONIE, AROME-Norway and AROME-MetCoOp Experimental HARMONIE models have been run at MET Norway since August 8, leading to AROME-Norway which on October was introduced on yr.no, and AROME-MetCoOp which is run in cooperation between Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institue and MET Norway and replaced AROME-Norway on yr.no 7 May. HARMONIE is the acronym for HIRLAM s meso-scale forecast system (Hirlam Aladin Regional/Meso-scale Operational NWP In Europe). The HARMONIE system includes several configuration options. This section presents some of the main components and setups that are or has been used at MET. More documentation is available on ALARO- physics ALARO- has physical parameterizations targeted for grey scale resolutions ( - km). It is a spin-off of the Météo-France physical parameterizations used in the globale ARPEGE, but with a separate radiation scheme, MT micro-physical frame work, and the Toucans turbulence scheme. Much of the development has been done by the RC LACE (Regional Cooperation for Limited Area modeling in Central Europe) community.. AROME physics AROME (Applications of Research to Operations at MEsoscale) is targeted for horizontal resolution. km or finer. It uses physical parameterizations based on the French academia model Meso-NH and the external surface model SURFEX. AROME has been operational at Météo- France since 8 December 8, with a horizontal resolution of. km.. SURFEX as surface model SURFEX (Surface externalisée) is developed at Météo-France and academia for offline experiments and introduced in NWP models to ensure consistent treatment of processes related to surface. Météo-France is already using SURFEX for some of their configurations and is planning to use it for all their configurations. Surface modelling and assimilation benefits from the possibility to run offline experiments. SURFEX is also used for offline applications in e.g. hydrology, vegetation monitoring and snow avalanche forecasts.
6 HARMONIE, AROME-NORWAY AND AROME-METCOOP. Data assimilation SURFEX includes routines to simulate the exchange of energy and water between the atmosphere and surface types (tiles); land, sea (ocean), lake (inland water) and town. The land or nature tile can be divided further into vegetation types (patches). ISBA (Interaction between Soil Biosphere and Atmosphere) is used for modelling the land surface processes. There are ISBA options; - and -layer force restore and a diffusive approach, where the first one is used in HIRLAM. Towns may be treated by a separate TEB (Town Energy Balance) module. Seas and lakes are also treated separately. The lake model, FLAKE (Freshwater LAKE), has recently been introduced in SURFEX. A global ECOCLIMAP database which combines land cover maps and satellite information gives information about surface properties on km resolution. The orography is taken from gtopo. SURFEX Scientific Documentation and User s Guide are available on Data assimilation NWP models are updated regularly using observations received in real-time from the global observing system. With one exception the models run at MET are updated at, 6, and 8 UTC. AROME-MetCoOp is updated each third hour; at,, 6, 9,,, 8 and UTC... Surface analysis Surface analysis is performed by CANARI (Code d Analyse Nécessaire à ARPEGE pour ses Rejets et son Initialisation) (Taillefer, ). The analysis method is Optimal Interpolation and only conventional synoptic observations are used. meter temperature and relative humidity observations are used to update the surface and soil temperature and moisture. The snow analysis is also performed with CANARI in analogy with the HIRLAM snow analysis. Snow depth observations are used to update Snow Water Equivalent. The snow fields are analysed only at 6 UTC as there are very few snow depth observations at, and 8. The Sea Surface Temperature is not analysed, but taken from the boundaries. uses the OSTIA (Operational Sea Surface Temperature and Sea Ice Analysis) product, including SST from UK Met Office and SIC from MET. The surface temperature over sea ice is taken from the boundary model and remains unchanged through the forecast... Upper air analysis AROME-MetCoOp runs three dimensional variational (D VAR) data assimilation using conventional observations from synop stations, ships, radiosondes and aircrafts. AMSU-A and AMSU-B/MHS data from the polar orbiting NOAA and METOP satellites is also used.
7 VERIFICATION MEASURES. Boundaries and initialization of upper air fields. Boundaries and initialization of upper air fields Harmonie. and Harmonie. got their boundary values (-hourly) from the model at approximately 6 km resolution. The upper air fields were initialized from forecasts each cycle. Harmonie. had 6 vertical levels (6 using the definition). Harmonie. had also 6 vertical levels (HIRLAM6 using the HIRLAM definition). AROME-Norway and AROME-MetCoOp get their boundary values (-hourly) from the model at approximately 6 km resolution. They have currently 6 vertical levels. AROME- Norway do no upper air assimilation, the upper air fields are initialized from forecasts each cycle. None of the HARMONIE configurations at MET have applied digital filter initialization (DFI). Verification measures All model forecasts in this report are verified against observations by interpolating (bilinear) the grid based forecasts to the observational sites. As a consequence, it should be noted that it is the models abilities to forecast the observations that is being quantifed and assessed. Thus, there is no attempt in this report to verify area averaged precipitation for example. Verification is carried out both for raw and categorized forecasts. In the following, let f,..., f n denote the forecasts and o,..., o n the corresponding observations.. Forecasts of continuous variables The verification statistics applied to continuous variables are defined in the table below
8 VERIFICATION MEASURES. Forecasts of categorical variables Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Mean Error ME n n i= (f i o i ) to Mean Absolute Error MAE n n i= f i o i to Standard Deviation of Error SDE ( n n i= (f i o i ME) ) / to Root Mean Square Error RMSE ( n n i= (f i o i ) ) / to Correlation COR n n i= (fi f)(o i ō) SD(f)SD(o) to In the formula for COR the following definitions are used f = n n f i, i= ō = n n i= o i SD(f) = ( n n (f i f) ) / ( n, SD(o) = (o i ō) ) / n i= for the means and standard deviations of the forecasts and observations. i=. Forecasts of categorical variables All variables in this report are continuous in raw form, but it is possible to categorize them and verify these. For example, wind speed above a given threshold could be of interest which would result in two possible outcomes (yes and no). The verification is then completely summarized by a contingency table as the one shown below event observed yes no event forecasted yes a b no c d Verification statistics for such forecasts are listed in the following table
9 VERIFICATION MEASURES. Observations Statistic Acronym Formula Range Optimal score Hit rate HR a a+c to False alarm rate F b b+d to False alarm ratio FAR b a+b to Equitable threat score ETS a ar a+b+c ar / to ( = no skill) Hanssen-Kuipers skill score KSS HR - F to ( = no skill) In the formula for ETS ar = (a + b)(a + c)/n.. Observations All observations come from Klimadatavarehuset at MET. Only synop stations are used, except for precipitation where all availiable stations are used for better spatial coverage. The model wind speed is verified against the mean wind FF observations. For post processed wind speed, the maxium min mean wind speed last hour, FX, is used. 6
10 NORWAY Norway. Comments to verification results Mean Sea Level Pressure: Slight increase in bias for AM, compared with the winter season, which still has the highest bias amongst the models. still the best model for MSLP, while AM has the second lowest MAE. Wind speed: Mean wind speed: More diurnal variations in the bias during spring, than in the winter. Not so much diurnal variation for AM. Negative bias for. The Hirlam models have negative biases during daytime and positive biases in the night. AM has a postive bias, but only of about.ms. AM scores better than the rest of the models in ETS. AM also has considerably more events above ms compared with the rest of the models, still too few compared with the observations. Max mean wind speed: The post processed version of AM is generally underestimating the max mean wind speed. H8_PP has a smaller bias, but AM scores highest for ETS. Wind gust: The wind gust from AM is generally too low, while the wind gust from H8 is similarly too high. The 9hPa wind is quite similar in both models. MAE is considerably lower for the wind gust than the 9hPa wind. The wind gust scores better for all thresholds except the highest, were the 9hPa wind is slightly better. Temperature m: All models have a cold bias during the spring of. H has the smallest bias. and AM also have a cold trend, and end up at around - C after 6h. For this is actually an improvement from the winter season. While for AM it decrease in score. SDE is reduced for all models, compared with the winter season. MAE is also in general reduced, but the reduction is largest for. In total H is the model with the lowest MAE for the spring. Post processed temperature: Hardly any bias in temperature after post processing. MAE is a bit reduced, few differences between H8.KF and AM.KF. Daily precipitation: Positive biases for all models, except AM.median. has the highest bias, while AM has the smallest bias and the lowest MAE. HR is highest for for thresholds up to mm/day. For thresholds above this, AM has the highest HR. AM.median has the lowest FAR up to mm/day, and the highest ETS for thresholds below 8mm/day. has the highest ETS between 8-mm/day. Above mm/day AM has the highest score. This is seen again in the multiple contingency table, where AM.median has the highest number correct in 7
11 NORWAY. Comments to verification results the lowest category, rules the middle categories, while AM wins in the >mm/day category. 8
12
13 NORWAY. Pressure and variables at pressure levels. Pressure and variables at pressure levels.. AM H8 H ME 9 stations. [hpa] Lead Time [h] SDE 9 stations AM H8 H [hpa] Lead Time [h] MAE 9 stations.. AM H8 H [hpa] Lead Time [h]
14 NORWAY. Pressure and variables at pressure levels AM H8 H ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations AM H8 H.... SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations
15 NORWAY. Pressure and variables at pressure levels ME AM UTC ME Hirlam UTC ME UTC SDE AM UTC SDE Hirlam UTC SDE UTC Geopotential height at Norwegian stations ME AM UTC ME Hirlam UTC ME UTC SDE AM UTC SDE Hirlam UTC SDE UTC Wind speed at Norwegian stations
16 NORWAY. Pressure and variables at pressure levels Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+,+6,+ UTC. Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM..... Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Standard Deviation of Error Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar. Mean Error Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
17
18 NORWAY. Wind Speed m. Wind Speed m ME stations.. AM H8 H [m/s] Lead time [h].. AM H8 H SDE stations [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE stations. AM H8 H. [m/s] Lead time [h]
19 NORWAY. Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM H8 H False Alarm Ratio stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s] 6
20 NORWAY. Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations 6 AM H8 H SDE 6 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations AM H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum (,] (,] AM (,7] (7,] H8 (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] 77 Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] (,] (,7] (7,] H (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] 9 8 (,Inf] 6 77 Sum Sum
21 Mean Error 9 Norwegian stations Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM +,+,+6,+ UTC Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian mountainous stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
22 NORWAY. Wind Speed m Standard Deviation of Error 9 Norwegian stations +,+,+6,+ UTC Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian mountainous stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 9
23 NORWAY. Wind Speed m Mean Absolute Error 9 Norwegian stations +,+,+6,+ UTC Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian mountainous stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
24
25 NORWAY. Max Mean Wind Speed m. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP. [m/s] Lead time [h].. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP SDE stations [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP [m/s] Lead time [h]
26 NORWAY. Max Mean Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP False Alarm Ratio stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]
27 NORWAY. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations 6 AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP SDE 6 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum AM (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] AM_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] H8 (,] (,7] (7,] H8_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] Sum Sum
28
29 NORWAY. Wind gust. Wind gust ME stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time SDE stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time MAE stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time 6
30 NORWAY. Wind gust..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold..8 False Alarm Ratio Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 stations Exceedance threshold..8 Equitable Threat Score Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold 7
31
32 NORWAY.6 Temperature m.6 Temperature m. ME 79 stations. ME [C]... AM H8 H Lead Time AM H8 H SDE 79 stations SDE [C] Lead Time MAE 79 stations.6. AM H8 H MAE [C] Lead Time 9
33 NORWAY.6 Temperature m AM H8 H ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 79 stations AM H8 H..... SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 79 stations
34 Mean Error Norwegian stations +,+,+6,+ UTC Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian inland stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
35 NORWAY.6 Temperature m Standard Deviation of Error Norwegian stations Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM +,+,+6,+ UTC Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian inland stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
36 NORWAY.6 Temperature m Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations +,+,+6,+ UTC Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Norwegian inland stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
37
38 NORWAY.7 Post processed temperature m.7 Post processed temperature m ME 79 stations.. ME [C].. AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF Lead Time SDE [C] AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF SDE 79 stations Lead Time MAE 79 stations.6. AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF MAE [C] Lead Time
39 NORWAY.7 Post processed temperature m AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 79 stations AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF..... SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 79 stations 6
40
41 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation.8 Daily precipitation ME stations.. AM AM.med H8 H [mm].... Lead Time [h].. AM AM.med H8 H SDE stations [mm]... Lead Time [h] MAE stations.. AM AM.med H8 H [mm].. Lead Time [h] 8
42 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation. Lead time [h]: + HR stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm]. Lead time [h]: + FAR stations Exceedance threshold [mm] AM AM.med H8 H..8 Lead time [h]: + ETS stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm] 9
43 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation AM AM.med H8 H ME Lead time [h]: +,+ stations AM AM.med H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+ stations OBS AM [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum OBS AM.med [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum OBS [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum OBS H8 [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum Lead time [h]: +,+ stations
44 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation Mean Error 96 Norwegian stations Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM + UTC Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar coastal stations Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 6 stations more than m above sea level Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 9 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
45 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation Standard Deviation of Error 8 96 Norwegian stations Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM + UTC 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar coastal stations 8 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 6 stations more than m above sea level 8 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 9 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm 8 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
46 NORWAY.8 Daily precipitation Mean Absolute Error Norwegian stations Hirlam8 Harmonie. AROME_Norway AM + UTC Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 7 coastal stations 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 7 6 stations more than m above sea level 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 7 9 stations with daily mean precipitation > mm 6 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar
47 6 Eastern Norway 6. Comments to the verification results Snow-day in South-East Norway March 6 The public forecast on Yr.no was misleading. A warm front approached from the south, with warm moist air overlaying the established cold air in the region. The cold layer below ft is well represented in the profiles from Gardermoen and Rygge, with the warm air sliding on top. AROME-MetCoOp seems to be slightly warmer near the surface than the Hirlam models. The two temperature plots show values AROME-MetCoOp before and after post-processing of m-temperature, compared to SYNOP observations in the area near Oslo. Before postprocessing the m-tempertature is - C higher than the observations. The post-processing raises the temperature by some - C, and is thereby pulling the forecast further away from what is observed. Combined with a symbol algorithm that is based heavily on Tm, this produced a forecast of some - mm rain, while in reality we saw - cm snow. This error in forecasted/postprocessed m-temperature lasted for - days prior to the event, and this short period is not visible in the overall statistics for temperature. However, for the forecasts issued for this particular day, it was of great importance.
48 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Comments to the verification results Figure : Figures from the March 6 case. Topleft: Forecasters analysis of the synoptic situation. Topright: Vertical profile from Gardermoen. Bottom: Vertical profile from Rygge.
49 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Comments to the verification results Figure : Figures from the March 6 case. Topleft: Forecasted values from AROME (raw) and observations. Topright: Forecasted values from AROME (post processed) and observations. Bottom: Forecast from Yr. 6
50
51 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Pressure 6. Pressure ME 7 stations.. AM H8 H [hpa] Lead Time [h] [hpa] AM H8 H SDE 7 stations Lead Time [h] MAE 7 stations.. AM H8 H [hpa] Lead Time [h] 8
52 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Pressure ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations... AM H8 H 9
53
54 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m 6. Wind Speed m.. AM H8 H ME 76 stations. [m/s] Lead time [h] SDE 76 stations.. AM H8 H [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE 76 stations. AM H8 H [m/s] Lead time [h]
55 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 76 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM H8 H False Alarm Ratio 76 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 76 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]
56 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 76 stations 6 AM H8 H 6 SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 76 stations AM H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 76 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum (,] (,] AM (,7] (7,] H8 (,7] (7,] 7 99 (,Inf] 6 (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] (,] (,7] (7,] H (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] Sum Sum
57
58 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
59 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m ME 76 stations.. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP. [m/s] Lead time [h] SDE 76 stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP. [m/s] Lead time [h].. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP MAE 76 stations [m/s] Lead time [h] 6
60 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
61 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 76 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP False Alarm Ratio 76 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 76 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s] 8
62 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 76 stations 6 AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 76 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 76 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum AM (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] AM_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] H8 (,] (,7] (7,] H8_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] Sum Sum
63
64 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind gust 6. Wind gust ME 68 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time 6 AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 SDE 68 stations Lead time... AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 MAE 68 stations Lead time 6
65 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Wind gust..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 68 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold..8 False Alarm Ratio Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 68 stations Exceedance threshold..8 Equitable Threat Score Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ 68 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold 6
66
67 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m 6. Temperature m. ME 9 stations. ME [C]... AM H8 H Lead Time SDE 9 stations.. AM H8 H SDE [C] Lead Time MAE 9 stations..8 AM H8 H MAE [C] Lead Time 6
68 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m ME.... Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations... AM H8 H SDE. Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations.... AM H8 H 6
69 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
70 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
71 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
72 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6. Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
73
74 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.6 Post processed temperature m 6.6 Post processed temperature m ME 9 stations.. ME [C]... AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF Lead Time SDE 9 stations.. AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF SDE [C] Lead Time MAE 9 stations..8 AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF MAE [C] Lead Time 7
75 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.6 Post processed temperature m AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF..... SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations 7
76
77 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.7 Daily precipitation 6.7 Daily precipitation ME stations.. AM AM.med H8 H [mm]... Lead Time [h] SDE stations.. AM AM.med H8 H [mm]... Lead Time [h].. AM AM.med H8 H MAE stations [mm].. Lead Time [h] 7
78 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.7 Daily precipitation. Lead time [h]: + HR stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm]. Lead time [h]: + FAR stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm]..8 Lead time [h]: + ETS stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm] 7
79 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.7 Daily precipitation Lead time [h]: +,+ ME stations AM AM.med H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+ stations 8 6 AM AM.med H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+ OBS [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] [,.] OBS stations [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum AM (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] AM.med (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] [,.] (.,] (,] (,] H8 (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] (,Inf] Sum Sum
80
81 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.7 Daily precipitation AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
82 6 EASTERN NORWAY 6.7 Daily precipitation AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
83 7 Western Norway 7. Comments to the verification results Wind speed m: For the period st of March to th of May Arome, Hirlam and Hirlam8 have a small positive bias in wind speed during night time and a small negative bias in the afternoon. has a negative bias at both day time and night times. Arome scores best for wind speeds below ms and Hirlam 8 scores best for wind speeds above ms. Max mean wind speed m: For Max Mean Wind Speed, both Arome and Hirlam8 have a negative bias. After postprocessing both Arome and Hirlam8 have small negative biases. For max mean wind speed Arome scores better for wind speeds below ms, while Arome and Hirlam are equal above ms. Wind gust: For wind gust Arome has a negative bias around ms, while Hirlam8 has a positive bias between. and ms. If we look at wind speed at 9 hpa (which is often used as an estimate of wind gust), there are only minor differences in bias between the Arome and Hirlam8. Both have a positive bias around ms at midnight and a negative bias around ms around noon. Wind gust from Arome scores best for wind speeds below ms, while Hirlam8 scores better for stronger wind gust. Wind gust from Arome and Hirlam8 score better than wind speed at 9 hpa for wind gust below ms, while wind speed at 9 hpa score better for wind gust above ms. Temperature m: For temperature Hirlam, Hirlam8, Arome and all have a negative bias. Both Arome and have an increasing negative bias with lead time. After post-processing both Arome and Hirlam8 have almost no bias. Precipitation: For precipitation Arome, Hirlam8 and Hirlam have almost no bias, while have a positive bias. Arome scores best for both light and heavy precipitation, while scores better for precipitation between and mm pr hours. Case VV: Fog over the North Sea: On June -, AROME has a large area with fog over the North Sea, while satellite images show no fog.
84 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Comments to the verification results Figure : Figures from the June at 6 UTC. Left: Fog from AROME. Right: Satellite image. 8
85
86 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Pressure 7. Pressure.. AM H8 H ME stations. [hpa] Lead Time [h] AM H8 H SDE stations [hpa] Lead Time [h] MAE stations.. AM H8 H [hpa] Lead Time [h] 8
87 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Pressure ME.8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations AM H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations... AM H8 H 8
88
89 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind Speed m 7. Wind Speed m.. AM H8 H ME 7 stations [m/s] Lead time [h].. AM H8 H SDE 7 stations [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE 7 stations. AM H8 H. [m/s] Lead time [h] 86
90 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 7 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM H8 H False Alarm Ratio 7 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 7 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s] 87
91 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM H8 H SDE. Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 7 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum (,] (,] AM (,7] (7,] H8 (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] 8 Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] (,] (,7] (7,] H (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] 9 (,Inf] 6 Sum Sum
92
93 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind Speed m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
94 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind Speed m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
95
96 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Max Mean Wind Speed m 7. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME 7 stations.. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP [m/s] Lead time [h] SDE 7 stations.. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE 7 stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP [m/s] Lead time [h] 9
97 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Max Mean Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP False Alarm Ratio 7 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s] 9
98 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations..... AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 7 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum AM (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] AM_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] H8 (,] (,7] (7,] H8_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] 8 (,Inf] 6 7 Sum Sum
99
100 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind gust 7. Wind gust AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 ME 67 stations Lead time SDE 67 stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time MAE 67 stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time 97
101 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7. Wind gust..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 67 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold..8 False Alarm Ratio Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 67 stations Exceedance threshold..8 Equitable Threat Score Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ 67 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold 98
102
103 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m 7.6 Temperature m. ME 9 stations. ME [C]... AM H8 H Lead Time SDE 9 stations.7.6 AM H8 H SDE [C] Lead Time.7.6. AM H8 H MAE 9 stations MAE [C] Lead Time
104 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m AM H8 H ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations AM H8 H.... SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations
105 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
106 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
107 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
108 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.6 Temperature m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
109
110 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.7 Post processed temperature m 7.7 Post processed temperature m ME 9 stations. ME [C]... AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF Lead Time SDE [C] AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF SDE 9 stations Lead Time MAE 9 stations.. AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF MAE [C] Lead Time 7
111 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.7 Post processed temperature m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 9 stations.... AM AM.KF H8 H8.KF 8
112
113 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.8 Daily precipitation 7.8 Daily precipitation [mm]..... AM AM.med H8 H ME 6 stations.. Lead Time [h] AM AM.med H8 H SDE 6 stations [mm]... Lead Time [h].. AM AM.med H8 H MAE 6 stations [mm].. Lead Time [h]
114 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.8 Daily precipitation. Lead time [h]: + HR 6 stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm]. Lead time [h]: + FAR 6 stations Exceedance threshold [mm] AM AM.med H8 H..8 Lead time [h]: + ETS 6 stations AM AM.med H8 H Exceedance threshold [mm]
115 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.8 Daily precipitation ME Lead time [h]: +,+ 6 stations AM AM.med H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+ 6 stations AM AM.med H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+ OBS [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] [,.] OBS 6 stations [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum AM (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] AM.med (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] Sum [,.] [,.] (.,] (,] (,] H8 (.,] (,] (,] (,Inf] 6 9 (,Inf] 6 7 Sum Sum
116
117 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.8 Daily precipitation AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
118 7 WESTERN NORWAY 7.8 Daily precipitation AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
119 8 Northern Norway 8. Comments to the verification results Case VNN: Complex topography, Arome.km and preciptiation distribution Episode with heavy precipitation in Vest-Finnmark May - Synoptic situation: Slow moving system with semi-stationary occlusion front. Feature: Heavy precipitation, 9 observations with -mm/h. Several "seasonal" records. Model AROME 8Z.. Max values: mm/h (raw) 7mm/h (pp-max) mm/h (pp-median) Max values lowland (<m): mm/h (estimated with topography mask.) Comparing model with observations (mainly in lowland) shows that the model overall underpredicted the amounts. However, the model have much more precipitation at higher elevations, where we have no observations. It is important to compare the precipitation fields with elevation masks in complex terrain, it is otherwise easy to overpredict the amounts in lower, habitated areas. Current postprossessing that smooth precipitation fields (pp-median, pp-max) may sometimes give a better estimates compared to observations. Unfortunately there are a lot a variations between cases, due to topography and precipitation distribution, so it is hard to tell if one of the precip-fields is generally better than the others. Comparing them all, including elevation mask and/or habitated areas is a common practise among experienced forecasters.
120 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Comments to the verification results Figure : Figures from the heavy precipitation event May -. Topleft: Satellite image and forecasters analysis showing the synoptic situation. Topright: Accumulated h-precipitation field from AROME. Bottomleft: Max values lowland estimated with topography mask. Bottomright: Scatterplot of observed and forecasted h-precipitation. 7
121
122 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Pressure 8. Pressure ME stations. AM H8 H. [hpa] Lead Time [h] AM H8 H SDE stations [hpa] Lead Time [h] MAE stations.. AM H8 H. [hpa] Lead Time [h] 9
123 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Pressure ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations... AM H8 H SDE.. Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 stations AM H8 H
124
125 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind Speed m 8. Wind Speed m ME 7 stations.. AM H8 H [m/s] Lead time [h] SDE 7 stations. AM H8 H. [m/s] Lead time [h] MAE 7 stations. AM H8 H [m/s] Lead time [h]
126 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 7 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM H8 H False Alarm Ratio 7 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 7 stations AM H8 H Exceedance threshold [m/s]
127 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM H8 H SDE Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM H8 H Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 7 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum (,] (,] AM (,7] (7,] H8 (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] 9 6 Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] (,] (,7] (7,] H (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] (,Inf] 6 Sum Sum
128
129 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind Speed m AM + ME at observing sites forecast means
130 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind Speed m AM + SDE at observing sites forecast means
131
132 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Max Mean Wind Speed m 8. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME 7 stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP. [m/s] Lead time [h] SDE 7 stations. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP. [m/s] Lead time [h].. AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP MAE 7 stations [m/s] Lead time [h] 9
133 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Max Mean Wind Speed m..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP False Alarm Ratio 7 stations Exceedance threshold [m/s]..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Equitable Threat Score 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Exceedance threshold [m/s]
134 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Max Mean Wind Speed m ME Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP SDE 6 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 7 stations AM AM_PP H8 H8_PP Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+8 UTC OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] OBS 7 stations [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum AM (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] AM_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum Sum OBS OBS [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] Sum [,] [,] H8 (,] (,7] (7,] H8_PP (,] (,7] (7,] (,Inf] 6 6 (,Inf] Sum Sum
135
136 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind gust 8. Wind gust AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 ME 67 stations Lead time SDE 67 stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time MAE 67 stations.. AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Lead time
137 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8. Wind gust..8 Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ Hit Rate 67 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold..8 False Alarm Ratio Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_9 67 stations Exceedance threshold..8 Equitable Threat Score Lead time [h]: +,+6,..,+ 67 stations AM_FG H8_FG AM_9 H8_ Exceedance threshold
138
139 8 NORTHERN NORWAY 8.6 Temperature m 8.6 Temperature m ME 8 stations. ME [C].... AM H8 H Lead Time.8.7 AM H8 H SDE 8 stations.6 SDE [C] Lead Time MAE 8 stations. AM H8 H. MAE [C] Lead Time 6
Verification of cloud simulation in HARMONIE AROME
METCOOP MEMO No. 01, 2013 Verification of cloud simulation in HARMONIE AROME A closer look at cloud cover, cloud base and fog in AROME Karl-Ivar Ivarsson, Morten Køltzow, Solfrid Agersten Front: Low fog
More informationApplication of Numerical Weather Prediction Models for Drought Monitoring. Gregor Gregorič Jožef Roškar Environmental Agency of Slovenia
Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Models for Drought Monitoring Gregor Gregorič Jožef Roškar Environmental Agency of Slovenia Contents 1. Introduction 2. Numerical Weather Prediction Models -
More informationComparative Evaluation of High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Models COSMO-WRF
3 Working Group on Verification and Case Studies 56 Comparative Evaluation of High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Models COSMO-WRF Bogdan Alexandru MACO, Mihaela BOGDAN, Amalia IRIZA, Cosmin Dănuţ
More informationCloud Model Verification at the Air Force Weather Agency
2d Weather Group Cloud Model Verification at the Air Force Weather Agency Matthew Sittel UCAR Visiting Scientist Air Force Weather Agency Offutt AFB, NE Template: 28 Feb 06 Overview Cloud Models Ground
More informationUse of numerical weather forecast predictions in soil moisture modelling
Use of numerical weather forecast predictions in soil moisture modelling Ari Venäläinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Meteorological research ari.venalainen@fmi.fi OBJECTIVE The weather forecast models
More informationVerification working group
Verification working group Sander Tijm Gwenaelle Hello With contributions from Mariska Derkova and Doinia Banciu Contents of talk Plans of cooperation between Hirlam and Aladin in physics Why verification
More informationEstimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model
Estimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model Roger Randriamampianina Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary roger@met.hu Abstract Assimilation of satellite radiances
More informationTowards an NWP-testbed
Towards an NWP-testbed Ewan O Connor and Robin Hogan University of Reading, UK Overview Cloud schemes in NWP models are basically the same as in climate models, but easier to evaluate using ARM because:
More informationProject Title: Quantifying Uncertainties of High-Resolution WRF Modeling on Downslope Wind Forecasts in the Las Vegas Valley
University: Florida Institute of Technology Name of University Researcher Preparing Report: Sen Chiao NWS Office: Las Vegas Name of NWS Researcher Preparing Report: Stanley Czyzyk Type of Project (Partners
More informationVery High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011
Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for 2000-2011 David H. Bromwich, Lesheng Bai,, Keith Hines, and Sheng-Hung Wang Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center The Ohio State University
More informationConvective Clouds. Convective clouds 1
Convective clouds 1 Convective Clouds Introduction Convective clouds are formed in vertical motions that result from the instability of the atmosphere. This instability can be caused by: a. heating at
More informationREGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING
REGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING Regional Climate Modelling at the Hungarian Meteorological Service ANDRÁS HORÁNYI (horanyi( horanyi.a@.a@met.hu) Special thanks: : Gabriella Csima,, Péter Szabó, Gabriella
More informationThe impact of window size on AMV
The impact of window size on AMV E. H. Sohn 1 and R. Borde 2 KMA 1 and EUMETSAT 2 Abstract Target size determination is subjective not only for tracking the vector but also AMV results. Smaller target
More informationWind resources map of Spain at mesoscale. Methodology and validation
Wind resources map of Spain at mesoscale. Methodology and validation Martín Gastón Edurne Pascal Laura Frías Ignacio Martí Uxue Irigoyen Elena Cantero Sergio Lozano Yolanda Loureiro e-mail:mgaston@cener.com
More informationSAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations
SAFNWC/MSG Cloud type/height. Application for fog/low cloud situations 22 September 2011 Hervé LE GLEAU, Marcel DERRIEN Centre de météorologie Spatiale. Lannion Météo-France 1 Fog or low level clouds?
More informationTitelmasterformat durch Klicken. bearbeiten
Evaluation of a Fully Coupled Atmospheric Hydrological Modeling System for the Sissili Watershed in the West African Sudanian Savannah Titelmasterformat durch Klicken June, 11, 2014 1 st European Fully
More informationCloud verification: a review of methodologies and recent developments
Cloud verification: a review of methodologies and recent developments Anna Ghelli ECMWF Slide 1 Thanks to: Maike Ahlgrimm Martin Kohler, Richard Forbes Slide 1 Outline Cloud properties Data availability
More informationInvestigations on COSMO 2.8Km precipitation forecast
Investigations on COSMO 2.8Km precipitation forecast Federico Grazzini, ARPA-SIMC Emilia-Romagna Coordinator of physical aspects group of COSMO Outline Brief description of the COSMO-HR operational suites
More informationVALIDATION OF SAFNWC / MSG CLOUD PRODUCTS WITH ONE YEAR OF SEVIRI DATA
VALIDATION OF SAFNWC / MSG CLOUD PRODUCTS WITH ONE YEAR OF SEVIRI DATA M.Derrien 1, H.Le Gléau 1, Jean-François Daloze 2, Martial Haeffelin 2 1 Météo-France / DP / Centre de Météorologie Spatiale. BP 50747.
More informationForecaster comments to the ORTECH Report
Forecaster comments to the ORTECH Report The Alberta Forecasting Pilot Project was truly a pioneering and landmark effort in the assessment of wind power production forecast performance in North America.
More informationMOGREPS status and activities
MOGREPS status and activities by Warren Tennant with contributions from Rob Neal, Sarah Beare, Neill Bowler & Richard Swinbank Crown copyright Met Office 32 nd EWGLAM and 17 th SRNWP meetings 1 Contents
More information4.3. David E. Rudack*, Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and Technology National Weather Service, NOAA 1.
43 RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY TESTING OF MOS WIND SPEED AND DIRECTION GUIDANCE USING VARIOUS SAMPLE SIZES FROM THE GLOBAL ENSEMBLE FORECAST SYSTEM (GEFS) RE- FORECASTS David E Rudack*, Meteorological Development
More informationStatus of ALADIN-LAEF, Impact of Clustering on Initial Perturbations of ALADIN-LAEF
Status of ALADIN-LAEF, Impact of Clustering on Initial Perturbations of ALADIN-LAEF Florian Weidle, Martin Bellus, Alexander Kann, Martin Steinheimer, Christoph Wittmann, Yong Wang and others Outline The
More informationMode-S Enhanced Surveillance derived observations from multiple Air Traffic Control Radars and the impact in hourly HIRLAM
Mode-S Enhanced Surveillance derived observations from multiple Air Traffic Control Radars and the impact in hourly HIRLAM 1 Introduction Upper air wind is one of the most important parameters to obtain
More informationDaily High-resolution Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature
Daily High-resolution Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature by Richard W. Reynolds 1, Thomas M. Smith 2, Chunying Liu 1, Dudley B. Chelton 3, Kenneth S. Casey 4, and Michael G. Schlax 3 1 NOAA National
More informationVirtual Met Mast verification report:
Virtual Met Mast verification report: June 2013 1 Authors: Alasdair Skea Karen Walter Dr Clive Wilson Leo Hume-Wright 2 Table of contents Executive summary... 4 1. Introduction... 6 2. Verification process...
More informationMesoscale re-analysis of historical meteorological data over Europe Anna Jansson and Christer Persson, SMHI ERAMESAN A first attempt at SMHI for re-analyses of temperature, precipitation and wind over
More informationAn exploratory study of the possibilities of analog postprocessing
Intern rapport ; IR 2009-02 An exploratory study of the possibilities of analog postprocessing Dirk Wolters De Bilt, 2009 KNMI internal report = intern rapport; IR 2009-02 De Bilt, 2009 PO Box 201 3730
More informationParameterization of Cumulus Convective Cloud Systems in Mesoscale Forecast Models
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Parameterization of Cumulus Convective Cloud Systems in Mesoscale Forecast Models Yefim L. Kogan Cooperative Institute
More informationTemporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product
Temporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product Michael J. Lewis Ph.D. Student, Department of Earth and Environmental Science University of Texas at San Antonio ABSTRACT
More informationIBM Big Green Innovations Environmental R&D and Services
IBM Big Green Innovations Environmental R&D and Services Smart Weather Modelling Local Area Precision Forecasting for Weather-Sensitive Business Operations (e.g. Smart Grids) Lloyd A. Treinish Project
More informationNext generation models at MeteoSwiss: communication challenges
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Next generation models at MeteoSwiss: communication challenges Tanja Weusthoff, MeteoSwiss Material from
More informationDeveloping Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations
Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations S. C. Xie, R. T. Cederwall, and J. J. Yio Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California M. H. Zhang
More informationSeasonal & Daily Temperatures. Seasons & Sun's Distance. Solstice & Equinox. Seasons & Solar Intensity
Seasonal & Daily Temperatures Seasons & Sun's Distance The role of Earth's tilt, revolution, & rotation in causing spatial, seasonal, & daily temperature variations Please read Chapter 3 in Ahrens Figure
More informationBasic Climatological Station Metadata Current status. Metadata compiled: 30 JAN 2008. Synoptic Network, Reference Climate Stations
Station: CAPE OTWAY LIGHTHOUSE Bureau of Meteorology station number: Bureau of Meteorology district name: West Coast State: VIC World Meteorological Organization number: Identification: YCTY Basic Climatological
More informationTropical Cloud Population
Tropical Cloud Population Before Satellites Visual Observation View from and aircraft flying over the South China Sea Radiosonde Data Hot tower hypothesis Riehl & Malkus 1958 Satellite Observations Post
More information7613-1 - Page 1. Weather Unit Exam Pre-Test Questions
Weather Unit Exam Pre-Test Questions 7613-1 - Page 1 Name: 1) Equal quantities of water are placed in four uncovered containers with different shapes and left on a table at room temperature. From which
More informationMonsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events
Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events M Rajeevan National Climate Centre India Meteorological Department Pune 411 005 rajeevan@imdpune.gov.in Outline of the presentation Monsoon rainfall Variability
More informationIntroduction to the forecasting world Jukka Julkunen FMI, Aviation and military WS
Boundary layer challenges for aviation forecaster Introduction to the forecasting world Jukka Julkunen FMI, Aviation and military WS 3.12.2012 Forecast for general public We can live with it - BUT Not
More informationThe Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) toolkit
The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) toolkit EWEA Wind Power Forecasting Workshop, Rotterdam December 3, 2013 Caroline Draxl NREL/PR-5000-60977 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department
More informationAffiliation: * The Norwegian Meteorological institute, Oslo, ** SINTEF ICT> > Applied Mathematics, Trondheim, Norway 8/15/14
An operational system for forecasting of turbulence in the vicinity of airports in Norway WWOSC 2014, Montréal, Canada Knut Helge Midtbo*, Jakob Suild*, Karstein Soerli** and Joern Kristiansen* Affiliation:
More informationDevelopment of an Integrated Data Product for Hawaii Climate
Development of an Integrated Data Product for Hawaii Climate Jan Hafner, Shang-Ping Xie (PI)(IPRC/SOEST U. of Hawaii) Yi-Leng Chen (Co-I) (Meteorology Dept. Univ. of Hawaii) contribution Georgette Holmes
More informationCan latent heat release have a negative effect on polar low intensity?
Can latent heat release have a negative effect on polar low intensity? Ivan Føre, Jon Egill Kristjansson, Erik W. Kolstad, Thomas J. Bracegirdle and Øyvind Sætra Polar lows: are intense mesoscale cyclones
More informationMixing Heights & Smoke Dispersion. Casey Sullivan Meteorologist/Forecaster National Weather Service Chicago
Mixing Heights & Smoke Dispersion Casey Sullivan Meteorologist/Forecaster National Weather Service Chicago Brief Introduction Fire Weather Program Manager Liaison between the NWS Chicago office and local
More informationOverview of the IR channels and their applications
Ján Kaňák Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Jan.kanak@shmu.sk Overview of the IR channels and their applications EUMeTrain, 14 June 2011 Ján Kaňák, SHMÚ 1 Basics in satellite Infrared image interpretation
More informationSTATUS AND RESULTS OF OSEs. (Submitted by Dr Horst Böttger, ECMWF) Summary and Purpose of Document
WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION COMMISSION FOR BASIC SYSTEMS OPEN PROGRAMMME AREA GROUP ON INTEGRATED OBSERVING SYSTEMS EXPERT TEAM ON OBSERVATIONAL DATA REQUIREMENTS AND REDESIGN OF THE GLOBAL OBSERVING
More informationSouth Africa. General Climate. UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles. A. Karmalkar 1, C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1
UNDP Climate Change Country Profiles South Africa A. Karmalkar 1, C. McSweeney 1, M. New 1,2 and G. Lizcano 1 1. School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford. 2. Tyndall Centre for Climate
More informationUSING SIMULATED WIND DATA FROM A MESOSCALE MODEL IN MCP. M. Taylor J. Freedman K. Waight M. Brower
USING SIMULATED WIND DATA FROM A MESOSCALE MODEL IN MCP M. Taylor J. Freedman K. Waight M. Brower Page 2 ABSTRACT Since field measurement campaigns for proposed wind projects typically last no more than
More informationNowcasting: analysis and up to 6 hours forecast
Nowcasting: analysis and up to 6 hours forecast Very high resoultion in time and space Better than NWP Rapid update Application oriented NWP problems for 0 6 forecast: Incomplete physics Resolution space
More informationClimatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula
Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula Mansour Almazroui Center of Excellence for Climate Change Research (CECCR) King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia E-mail:
More informationA verification score for high resolution NWP: Idealized and preoperational tests
Technical Report No. 69, December 2012 A verification score for high resolution NWP: Idealized and preoperational tests Bent H. Sass and Xiaohua Yang HIRLAM - B Programme, c/o J. Onvlee, KNMI, P.O. Box
More informationGeography affects climate.
KEY CONCEPT Climate is a long-term weather pattern. BEFORE, you learned The Sun s energy heats Earth s surface unevenly The atmosphere s temperature changes with altitude Oceans affect wind flow NOW, you
More informationNear Real Time Blended Surface Winds
Near Real Time Blended Surface Winds I. Summary To enhance the spatial and temporal resolutions of surface wind, the remotely sensed retrievals are blended to the operational ECMWF wind analyses over the
More informationSOLAR IRRADIANCE FORECASTING, BENCHMARKING of DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES and APPLICATIONS of ENERGY METEOROLOGY
SOLAR IRRADIANCE FORECASTING, BENCHMARKING of DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES and APPLICATIONS of ENERGY METEOROLOGY Wolfgang Traunmüller 1 * and Gerald Steinmaurer 2 1 BLUE SKY Wetteranalysen, 4800 Attnang-Puchheim,
More informationFinnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, FI-00101 Helsinki 2. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu
Storm risks on forestry in Finland - occurrence and risk management Ari Venäläinen 1, Hilppa Gregow 1, Heli Peltola 2, Veli-Pekka Ikonen 2 and Seppo Kellomäki 2 1 Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O.
More informationIMPACT OF SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY-AMERENUE QUANTUM WEATHER PROJECT MESONET DATA ON WRF-ARW FORECASTS
IMPACT OF SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY-AMERENUE QUANTUM WEATHER PROJECT MESONET DATA ON WRF-ARW FORECASTS M. J. Mueller, R. W. Pasken, W. Dannevik, T. P. Eichler Saint Louis University Department of Earth and
More informationSIXTH GRADE WEATHER 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES
SIXTH GRADE WEATHER 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES WATER CYCLE OVERVIEW OF SIXTH GRADE WATER WEEK 1. PRE: Evaluating components of the water cycle. LAB: Experimenting with porosity and permeability.
More informationSeasonal Temperature Variations
Seasonal and Daily Temperatures Fig. 3-CO, p. 54 Seasonal Temperature Variations What causes the seasons What governs the seasons is the amount of solar radiation reaching the ground What two primary factors
More informationClimate Extremes Research: Recent Findings and New Direc8ons
Climate Extremes Research: Recent Findings and New Direc8ons Kenneth Kunkel NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites North Carolina State University and National Climatic Data Center h#p://assessment.globalchange.gov
More informationFog and low cloud ceilings in the northeastern US: climatology and dedicated field study
Fog and low cloud ceilings in the northeastern US: climatology and dedicated field study Robert Tardif National Center for Atmospheric Research Research Applications Laboratory 1 Overview of project Objectives:
More informationWhat Causes Climate? Use Target Reading Skills
Climate and Climate Change Name Date Class Climate and Climate Change Guided Reading and Study What Causes Climate? This section describes factors that determine climate, or the average weather conditions
More informationDeveloping sub-domain verification methods based on Geographic Information System (GIS) tools
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE: DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command Developing sub-domain verification methods based on Geographic Information System (GIS) tools
More informationCloud Correction and its Impact on Air Quality Simulations
Cloud Correction and its Impact on Air Quality Simulations Arastoo Pour Biazar 1, Richard T. McNider 1, Andrew White 1, Bright Dornblaser 3, Kevin Doty 1, Maudood Khan 2 1. University of Alabama in Huntsville
More information2. The map below shows high-pressure and low-pressure weather systems in the United States.
1. Which weather instrument has most improved the accuracy of weather forecasts over the past 40 years? 1) thermometer 3) weather satellite 2) sling psychrometer 4) weather balloon 6. Wind velocity is
More informationGuy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre, School of energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong
Diurnal and Semi-diurnal Variations of Rainfall in Southeast China Judy Huang and Johnny Chan Guy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre School of Energy and Environment City University of Hong Kong
More information8.5 Comparing Canadian Climates (Lab)
These 3 climate graphs and tables of data show average temperatures and precipitation for each month in Victoria, Winnipeg and Whitehorse: Figure 1.1 Month J F M A M J J A S O N D Year Precipitation 139
More informationCloud Masking and Cloud Products
Cloud Masking and Cloud Products MODIS Operational Algorithm MOD35 Paul Menzel, Steve Ackerman, Richard Frey, Kathy Strabala, Chris Moeller, Liam Gumley, Bryan Baum MODIS Cloud Masking Often done with
More informationEvalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data
Evalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data Kate Thayer-Calder and Dave Randall Colorado State University October 24, 2012 NOAA's 37th Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop Convective
More informationVerifying Extreme Rainfall Alerts for surface water flooding potential. Marion Mittermaier, Nigel Roberts and Clive Pierce
Verifying Extreme Rainfall Alerts for surface water flooding potential Marion Mittermaier, Nigel Roberts and Clive Pierce Pluvial (surface water) flooding Why Extreme Rainfall Alerts? Much of the damage
More informationValidation n 2 of the Wind Data Generator (WDG) software performance. Comparison with measured mast data - Flat site in Northern France
Validation n 2 of the Wind Data Generator (WDG) software performance Comparison with measured mast data - Flat site in Northern France Mr. Tristan Fabre* La Compagnie du Vent, GDF-SUEZ, Montpellier, 34967,
More information163 ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND REMOTELY SENSED TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS
ANALYSIS OF THE URBAN HEAT ISLAND EFFECT COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND REMOTELY SENSED TEMPERATURE OBSERVATIONS Rita Pongrácz *, Judit Bartholy, Enikő Lelovics, Zsuzsanna Dezső Eötvös Loránd University,
More informationAROME Weather Model - A Search for the Future
Status of AROME news since Bratislava '05 based on contributions from CNRM GMAP & GMME teams,lab. Aérologie, aladinists 1. System & workforce 2. Model & software 3. Assimilation 4. The Future 1 1. Multiscale
More informationProposals of Summer Placement Programme 2015
Proposals of Summer Placement Programme 2015 Division Project Title Job description Subject and year of study required A2 Impact of dual-polarization Doppler radar data on Mathematics or short-term related
More informationAZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA
AZ EGER-PATAK HIDROLÓGIAI VIZSGÁLATA, A FELSZÍNI VÍZKÉSZLETEK VÁRHATÓ VÁLTOZÁSÁBÓL ADÓDÓ MÓDOSULÁSOK AZ ÉGHAJLATVÁLTOZÁS HATÁSÁRA GÁBOR KEVE 1, GÉZA HAJNAL 2, KATALIN BENE 3, PÉTER TORMA 4 EXTRAPOLATING
More informationScholar: Elaina R. Barta. NOAA Mission Goal: Climate Adaptation and Mitigation
Development of Data Visualization Tools in Support of Quality Control of Temperature Variability in the Equatorial Pacific Observed by the Tropical Atmosphere Ocean Data Buoy Array Abstract Scholar: Elaina
More informationSouthern AER Atmospheric Education Resource
Southern AER Atmospheric Education Resource Vol. 9 No. 5 Spring 2003 Editor: Lauren Bell In this issue: g Climate Creations exploring mother nature s remote control for weather and Climate. g Crazy Climate
More informationClimate and Weather. This document explains where we obtain weather and climate data and how we incorporate it into metrics:
OVERVIEW Climate and Weather The climate of the area where your property is located and the annual fluctuations you experience in weather conditions can affect how much energy you need to operate your
More informationList 10 different words to describe the weather in the box, below.
Weather and Climate Lesson 1 Web Quest: What is the Weather? List 10 different words to describe the weather in the box, below. How do we measure the weather? Use this web link to help you: http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/weatherwise/activities/weatherstation/
More informationUSING THE GOES 3.9 µm SHORTWAVE INFRARED CHANNEL TO TRACK LOW-LEVEL CLOUD-DRIFT WINDS ABSTRACT
USING THE GOES 3.9 µm SHORTWAVE INFRARED CHANNEL TO TRACK LOW-LEVEL CLOUD-DRIFT WINDS Jason P. Dunion 1 and Christopher S. Velden 2 1 NOAA/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, 2 UW/CIMSS ABSTRACT Low-level
More informationFire Weather Index: from high resolution climatology to Climate Change impact study
Fire Weather Index: from high resolution climatology to Climate Change impact study International Conference on current knowledge of Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture and Forestry in Europe COST-WMO
More informationContinental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota
Continental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota Outline 1) Statistical results from SGP and AZORES 2) Challenge and Difficult
More information6.4 THE SIERRA ROTORS PROJECT, OBSERVATIONS OF MOUNTAIN WAVES. William O. J. Brown 1 *, Stephen A. Cohn 1, Vanda Grubiši 2, and Brian Billings 2
6.4 THE SIERRA ROTORS PROJECT, OBSERVATIONS OF MOUNTAIN WAVES William O. J. Brown 1 *, Stephen A. Cohn 1, Vanda Grubiši 2, and Brian Billings 2 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado.
More informationHuai-Min Zhang & NOAAGlobalTemp Team
Improving Global Observations for Climate Change Monitoring using Global Surface Temperature (& beyond) Huai-Min Zhang & NOAAGlobalTemp Team NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) [formerly:
More informationTOPIC: CLOUD CLASSIFICATION
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, DELHI DEPARTMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE ASL720: Satellite Meteorology and Remote Sensing TERM PAPER TOPIC: CLOUD CLASSIFICATION Group Members: Anil Kumar (2010ME10649) Mayank
More informationMeteorological Forecasting of DNI, clouds and aerosols
Meteorological Forecasting of DNI, clouds and aerosols DNICast 1st End-User Workshop, Madrid, 2014-05-07 Heiner Körnich (SMHI), Jan Remund (Meteotest), Marion Schroedter-Homscheidt (DLR) Overview What
More informationSub-grid cloud parametrization issues in Met Office Unified Model
Sub-grid cloud parametrization issues in Met Office Unified Model Cyril Morcrette Workshop on Parametrization of clouds and precipitation across model resolutions, ECMWF, Reading, November 2012 Table of
More informationNOAA to Provide Enhanced Frost Forecast Information to Improve Russian River Water Management
NOAA to Provide Enhanced Frost Forecast Information to Improve Russian River Water Management David W. Reynolds Meteorologist in Charge (Retired) National Weather Service Forecast Office San Francisco
More informationTowards assimilating IASI satellite observations over cold surfaces - the cloud detection aspect
Towards assimilating IASI satellite observations over cold surfaces - the cloud detection aspect Tuuli Perttula, FMI + Thanks to: Nadia Fourrié, Lydie Lavanant, Florence Rabier and Vincent Guidard, Météo
More informationWind Resource Assessment for BETHEL, ALASKA Date last modified: 2/21/2006 Compiled by: Mia Devine
813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org Wind Resource Assessment for BETHEL, ALASKA Date last modified: 2/21/2006 Compiled by: Mia
More informationKnut Helge Midtbø, Mariken Homleid and Viel Ødegaard (P.O. Box 43, N-0313 OSLO, NORWAY)
Verification of wind and turbulence forecasts for the airports Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest, Hasvik, Tromsø, Bardufoss, Evenes, Narvik, Svolvær, Leknes, Mo i Rana, Mosjøen, Sandnessjøen, Brønnøysund,
More informationInsolation Levels (Europe)
Insolation Levels (Europe) Insolation (10 year average) kwh/m 2 /day Country State/City Latitude Longitude Year Avg AT Vienna 48' 13" N 16' 22" E 1.10 1.81 2.80 3.76 4.76 5.12 5.72 4.98 3.68 2.15 1.28
More informationCatastrophe Bond Risk Modelling
Catastrophe Bond Risk Modelling Dr. Paul Rockett Manager, Risk Markets 6 th December 2007 Bringing Science to the Art of Underwriting Agenda Natural Catastrophe Modelling Index Linked Securities Parametric
More informationSynoptic assessment of AMV errors
NWP SAF Satellite Application Facility for Numerical Weather Prediction Visiting Scientist mission report Document NWPSAF-MO-VS-038 Version 1.0 4 June 2009 Synoptic assessment of AMV errors Renato Galante
More informationForest Fire Information System (EFFIS): Rapid Damage Assessment
Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS): Fire Danger D Rating Rapid Damage Assessment G. Amatulli, A. Camia, P. Barbosa, J. San-Miguel-Ayanz OUTLINE 1. Introduction: what is the JRC 2. What is EFFIS 3.
More information2.8 Objective Integration of Satellite, Rain Gauge, and Radar Precipitation Estimates in the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator Algorithm
2.8 Objective Integration of Satellite, Rain Gauge, and Radar Precipitation Estimates in the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator Algorithm Chandra Kondragunta*, David Kitzmiller, Dong-Jun Seo and Kiran
More information2001 2010 Danish Design Reference Year
2001 2010 Danish Design Reference Year - Reference Climate Dataset for Technical Dimensioning in Building, Construction and other Sectors Peter Grunnet Wang Mikael Scharling Kristian Pagh Nielsen Kim Bjarne
More informationU s e r M a n u a l. Avalanche Warning Service Eduard-Wallnoefer-Platz 3 A-6020 Innsbruck. Weather stations. 1 The map window: Version 12/2015
Avalanche Warning Service Eduard-Wallnoefer-Platz 3 A-6020 Innsbruck U s e r M a n u a l Weather stations In this database you will find all available weather stations from currently participating avalanche
More informationNCDC s SATELLITE DATA, PRODUCTS, and SERVICES
**** NCDC s SATELLITE DATA, PRODUCTS, and SERVICES Satellite data and derived products from NOAA s satellite systems are available through the National Climatic Data Center. The two primary systems are
More informationThe horizontal diffusion issue in CRM simulations of moist convection
The horizontal diffusion issue in CRM simulations of moist convection Wolfgang Langhans Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich June 9, 2009 Wolfgang Langhans Group retreat/bergell June
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More information