Lectures on An Introduction to Grothendieck s Theory of the Fundamental Group


 Erick Shelton
 2 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Lectures on n Introduction to Grothendieck s Theory of the Fundamental Group By J.P. Murre Notes by. nantharaman No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Bombay 5 Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay 1967
2
3 Preface These lectures contain the material presented in a course given at the Tata Institute during the period December February The purpose of these lectures was to give an introduction to Grothendieck s theory of the fundamental group in algebraic geometry with, as application, the study of the fundamental group of an algebraic curve over an algebraically closed field of arbitrary characteristic. ll of the material (and much more) can be found in the éminaire de géométrie algébrique of Grothendieck, Exposé V, IX and X. I thank Mr.. nantharaman for the careful preparation of the notes. J.P. Murre iii
4
5 Prerequisites We assume that the reader is somewhat familiar with the notion and elementary properties of preschemes. To give a rough indication: Chap. I, 16 and Chap. II, pages 114, and of the EG ( Éléments de Géometrie lgébrique of Grothendieck and Dieudon e). We have even recalled some of these required elementary properties in Chap. I and II of the notes but this is done very concisely. We need also all the fundamental theorems of EG, Chap. III (first part); these theorems are stated in the text without proof. We do not require the reader to be familiar with them; on the contrary, we hope that the applications which have been made will give some insight into the meaning of, and stimulate the interest in, these theorems. v
6
7 Contents Preface Prerequisites iii v 1 ffine chemes The heaf associated to pec ffine chemes Preschemes Product of Preschemes Fibres ubschemes ome formal properties of morphisms ffine morphisms The finiteness theorem Étale Morphisms and Étale Coverings Examples and Comments Étale coverings vii
8 viii Contents 4 The Fundamental Group Properties of the category C Construction of the Fundamental group Galois Categories and Morphisms of Profinite Groups pplication of the Comparison Theorem The teinfactorisation The first homotopy exact sequence The Technique of Descents and pplications n pplication of the Existence Theorem The second homotopy exact sequence The Homomorphism of pecialisation ppendix to Chapter IX 127
9 Chapter 1 ffine chemes 1.1 Let be a commutative ring with 1 and a multiplicatively closed set in, containing 1. We then form fractions a, a, s ; two s fractions a 1, a 2 are considered equal if there is an s 3 such that s 1 s 2 s 3 (a 1 s 2 a 2 s 1 )=0. When addition and multiplication are defined in the obvious way, these fractions form a ring, denoted by 1 and called the ring of fractions of with respect to the multiplicatively closed set. There is a natural ringhomomorphism 1 given by a a/1. This induces a(1 1) correspondence between prime ideals of not intersecting and prime ideals of 1, which is latticepreserving. If f and f is the multiplicatively closed set{1, f, f 2,...}, the ring of quotients 1 f is denoted by f. If p is a prime ideal of and = p, the ring of quotients 1 is denoted by p ; p is a local ring Let be a commutative ring with 1 and X the set of prime ideals of. For any E, we define V(E) as the subset{p : p a prime ideal E} of X. Then the following properties are easily verified: (i) α V(E α )=V( α E α ) 2 1
10 2 1. ffine chemes (ii) V(E 1 ) V(E 2 )=V(E 1 E 2 ) (iii) V(1) = (iv) V(0) = X. Thus, the sets V(E) satisfy the axioms for closed sets in a topology on X. The topology thus defined is called the Zariski topology on X; the topological space X is known as pec. Note. pec is a generalisation of the classical notion of an affine algebraic variety. uppose k is an algebraically closed field and let k[x 1,..., X n ]= k[x] be the polynomial ring in n variables over k. Letabe an ideal of k[x] and V be the set in k n defined by V={(α 1,...,α n ) : f (α 1,...,α n ) = 0 f a}. Then V is said to be an affine algebraic variety and the Hilbert s zero theorem says that the elements of V are in (1 1) correspondence with the maximal ideals of k[x]/a. Remarks 1.3. (a) Ifa(E) is the ideal generated by E in, then we have: V(E) = V(a(E)) (b) For f, define X f = X V( f ); then the X f form a basis for the Zariski topology on X. In fact, X V(E)= X f by (i). f E 3 (c) X is not in general Hausdorff; however, it is T 0. (d) X f X fα an n Z + such that f n is in the ideal generated α by the f αs. For any idealaof, define a ={a :a n a for some n Z + }. a is an ideal of and we assert that a = {p : p a prime ideal a}. To prove this, we assume, (as we may, by passing to /a) thata=(0). Clearly, (0) p. On the other hand, if a is such that a n 0 n Z +, then a 1= a is a nonzero ring and so contains a proper prime ideal; the lift p of this prime ideal in is such that a p.
11 1.4. The heaf associated to pec 3 It is thus seen that V(a)=V( a) and V( f ) V(a) f a. Hence: X f X fα V( f ) V( f α )=V( { f α }) α and this proves (d). (e) The open sets X f are quasicompact. In view of (b), it is enough to consider coverings by X gs; thus, if X f X fα, then by (d), we have f n = r a i f αi (say); again by α i=1 (d), we obtain X f = X f n r X fαi. i=1 (f) There is a (1 1) correspondence between closed sets of X and 4 roots of ideals of ; in this correspondence, closed irreducible sets of X go to prime ideals of and conversely. Every closed irreducible set of X is of the form (x) for some x X; such an x is called a generic point of that set, and is uniquely determined. (g) If is noetherian, pec is a noetherian space (i.e. satisfies the minimum condition for closed sets). α α 1.4 The heaf associated to pec We shall define a presheaf of rings on pec. It is enough to define the presheaf on a basis for the topology on X, namely, on the X f s; we set F (X f )= f. If X g X f, V(g) V( f ) and so g n = a 0 f for some n Z + and a 0. The homomorphism f g given by a f q a aq 0 g qn is independent of the way g is expressed in terms of f and thus defines a natural mapρg f : F (X f ) F (X g ) for X g X f. The transitivity conditions are readily verified and we have a presheaf of rings on X. This defines a sheaf Ã=O X of rings on X. It is easy to check that the stalk O p,x of O X at a point p of X is the local ring p.
12 4 1. ffine chemes If M is an module and if we define the presheaf X f M f = M f, we get a sheaf M of Ãmodules (in short, an ÃModule M), whose stalk at p X is M p = M P. 5 Remark. The presheaf X f M f is a sheaf, i.e. it satisfies the axioms (F 1 ) and (F 2 ) of Godement, Théorie des faisceaux, p In this section, we briefly recall certain sheaftheoretic notions Let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces. uppose F is a sheaf of abelian groups on X; we define a presheaf of abelian groups on Y by U Γ( f 1 (U), F ) for any open U Y; for V U, open in Y, the restriction maps of this presheaf will be the restriction homomorphismsγ( f 1 (U), F ) Γ( f 1 (V), F ). This presheaf is already a sheaf. The sheaf defined by this presheaf is called the direct image f (F ) of F under f. If U is any neighbourhood of f (x) in Y, the natural homomorphism Γ( f 1 (U), F ) F x given a homomorphismγ(u, f (F )) F x ; by passing to the inductive limit as U shrinks down to f (x), we obtain a natural homomorphism: f x : f (F ) f (x) F x. If O X is a sheaf of rings on X, f (O X ) has a natural structure of a sheaf of rings on Y. If F is an O X Module, f (F ) has a natural structure of an f (O X )Module. The direct image f (F ) is a covariant functor on F Let f : X Y be a continuous map of topological spaces andg be a sheaf of abelian groups on Y. Then it can be shown that there is a unique sheaf F of abelian groups on X such that: (a) there is a natural homomorphism of sheaves of abelian groups ρ=ρ g :g f (F )
13 and (b) for any sheaf H of abelian groups on X, the homomorphism Hom X (F, H ) Hom Y (g, f (H )) given byρ f (ϕ) ρ g is an isomorphism. The unique sheaf F of abelian groups on X with these properties is called the inverse image f 1 (g) ofgunder f. It can be shown that canonical homomorphism (*) f x ρ f (x) :g f (x) f 1 (g) x is an isomorphism, for every x X. The inverse image f 1 (g) is a covariant functor ongand the isomorphism ( ) shows that it is an exact functor. If O Y is a sheaf of rings on Y, f 1 (O Y ) has a natural structure of a sheaf of rings on X. Ifgis an O Y Module, f 1 (g) has a natural structure of an f 1 (O Y )Module ringed space is a pair (X, O X ) where X is a topological space 7 and O X is a sheaf of rings on X, called the structure sheaf of (X, O X ). morphismφ : (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) of ringed spaces is a pair ( f,ϕ) such that (i) f : X Y is a continuous map of topological spaces, and (ii) ϕ : O Y f (O X ) is a morphism of sheaves of rings on Y. Ringed spaces, with morphisms so defined, form a category. Observe that condition (ii) is equivalent to giving a morphism f 1 (O Y ) O X of sheaves of rings on X (see (1.5.2)). If F is a sheaf of O X modules, we denote byφ (F ) the sheaf f (F ), considered as an O Y Module throughϕ. Ifgis an O Y Module, f 1 (g) is an f 1 (O Y )Module and the morphism f 1 (O Y ) O X, defined byϕ, gives an O X Module f 1 (g) f 1 (OY ) O X ; the stalks of this O X Module are isomorphic tog f (x) O f (x) O x, under the identification f 1 (g) x g f (x). We denote this O X Module byφ (g). In general,φ is not an exact functor ong.
14 6 1. ffine chemes 1.6 ffine chemes ringed space of the form (pec, Ã), a ring, defined in (1.4) is called an affine scheme Letϕ: B be a ringhomomorphism;ϕ defines a map f= a ϕ : X= pec pec B=Y p ϕ 1 (p). ince a ϕ 1 (V(E))=V(ϕ(E)) for any E B, a ϕ is a continuous map. Let s B; ϕ defines, in a natural way, a homomorphism ϕ s : B s ϕ(s). In view of the remark at the end of (1.4), this gives us a homomorphism: B s =Γ(Y s, B) ϕ(s)=γ(x ϕ(s), Ã)=Γ(Y s, f (Ã)) and hence a homomorphism ϕ : B f (Ã). If x X the stalk map defined by ϕ, namely ϕ x : O f (x) B f (x) O x x is a local homomorphism (i.e. the image of the maximal ideal in B f (x) is contained in the maximal ideal of x ). 9 Definition morphismφ : (pec, Ã) (pec B, B) of two affine schemes, is a morphism of ringed spaces with the additional property thatφis of the form ( a ϕ, ϕ) for a homomorphismϕ : B of rings. It can be shown that a morphismφ = ( f,ϕ) of ringed spaces is a morphism of affine schemes (spec, Ã)(spec B, B) if and only if the stalkmaps are local homomorphisms. O f (x) O x defined by Φ(rather, byϕ)
15 1.6. ffine chemes 7 Remarks (a) If M is an module, M is an exact covariant functor on M. (b) For any modules M, N, HomÃ( M, Ñ) is canonically isomorphic to Hom (M, N). (c) If (X, O X )=(spec, Ã), (Y, O Y )=(spec B, B) are affine, there is a natural bijection from the set Hom(X, Y) of morphisms of affine schemes X Y onto the set Hom(B, ) of ringhomomorphisms B. (d) Let (X, O X ) = (pec, Ã) be an affine scheme and F an O X  module. Then one can show that F is quasicoherent (i.e. for every x X, an open neighbourhood U of x and an exact sequence (O X U) (I) (O X U) (J) F U 0) F M for an module M. If we assume that is noetherian, one sees that F is coherent F is to M for a finite type module M. (e) Let X Φ Y be a morphism of affine schemes and F (resp. g) 10 be a quasicoherent O X Module (resp. O Y Module). Then one can define a quasicoherent O Y Module (resp. O X Module) denoted byφ (F ) (resp. Φ (g)) just as in (1.5.3); if X = pec, Y = pec B andφ=( a ϕ, ϕ) for aϕ : B and if F= M, M an  module (resp.g=ñ, N a Bmodule) thenφ (F ) (resp.φ (g)) is canonically identified with [ϕ] M, where [ϕ] M is the abelian group M considered as a Bmodule through ϕ (resp. M B ). (For proofs see EG Ch. I)
16
17 Chapter 2 Preschemes Definition 2.1. ringed space (X, O X ) is called a prescheme if every 11 point x X has an open neighbourhood U such that (U, O X U) is an affine scheme. n open set U such that (U, O X U) is an affine scheme is called an affine open set of X; such sets form a basis for the topology on X. Definition morphismφ : (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) of preschemes is a morphism ( f,ϕ) of ringed spaces such that for every x X, the stalkmapϕ x : O f (x) O x defined byφis a local homomorphism. Preschemes then form a category (ch). In referring to a prescheme, we will often suppress the structure sheaf from notation and denote (X, O X ) simply by X uppose C is any category and ObC. We consider the pairs (T, f ) where T Ob C and f Hom C (T, ). If (T 1, f 1 ), (T 2, f 2 ) are two such pairs, we define Hom((T 1, f 1 ), (T 2, f 2 )) to be the set of C morphismsϕ : T 1 T 2, making the diagram ϕ T 1 f 1 9 f 2 T 2
18 10 2. Preschemes 12 commutative. This way we obtain a category, denoted by C. In the special case C= (ch), the category (ch/ )=(ch) is called the category of  preschemes; its morphisms are called morphisms. itself is known as the base prescheme of the category. Remark Let pec be an affine scheme and Y any prescheme. Then Hom(,Γ(Y, O Y )) is naturally isomorphic to Hom(Y, pec ). In fact, let (U i ) be an affine open covering of Y andϕ Hom (,Γ(Y, O Y )). The composite maps ϕ i : ϕ Γ(Y, O Y ) restriction Γ(U i, O Y ) give morphisms a ϕ i : U i pec, for every i, since the U i are affine. It is easily checked that a ϕ i = a ϕ j on U i U j, i, j. We then get a morphism a ϕ : Y pec ; the mapϕ a ϕ is a bijection from Hom(,Γ(Y, O Y )) onto Hom(Y, pec ) (cf. (1.6.4)(c)). It follows that every prescheme X can be considered as a peczprescheme in a natural way: (ch)=(ch/pecz)=(ch/z). 13 Remark Let (X, O X ) be a prescheme and F an O X module. Then it follows from (1.6.4)(d) that F is quasicoherent for every x X and any affine open neighbourhood U of x, F U M U, for aγ(u, O X )  module M U. We may take this as our definition of a quasicoherent O X module. 2.2 Product of Preschemes uppose (X, f ), (Y, g) are preschemes. We say that a triple (Z, p, q) is a product of X and Y over if: (i) Z is an prescheme (ii) p : Z X, q : Z Y are morphisms and
19 2.2. Product of Preschemes 11 (iii) for any T (ch/ ), the natural map: is a bijection. Hom (T, Z) Hom (T, X) Hom (T, Y) f (p. f, q. f ) The product of X and Y, being a solution to a universal problem, is obviously unique upto an isomorphism in the category. We denote the product (Z, p, q), if it exists by X Y and call it the fibreproduct of X and Y over ; p, q are called projection morphisms. Theorem If X, Y (ch/ ), the fibreproduct of X and Y over always exists. We shall not prove the theorem here. However, we observe that if 14 X= pec, Y= pec B and = pec C are all affine, then pec( C B) is a solution for our problem. In the general case, local fibreproducts are obtained from the affine case and are glued together in a suitable manner to yield a fibre product X Y. (For details see EG, Ch. I, Theorem (3.2.6)). Remarks. (1) The underlying set of X Y is not the fibreproduct of the underlying sets of X and Y over that of. However if x X, y Y lie over the same s, then there is a z X Y lying over x and y. (For a proof see Lemma (2.3.1)). (2) n open subset U of a prescheme X can be considered as a prescheme in a natural way. uppose, U X, V Y are open sets such that f (U), g(v) ; we may consider U, V as preschemes. When this is done, the fibreproduct U V is isomorphic to the open set p 1 (U) q 1 (V) in Z=X Y, considered as a prescheme. This follows easily from the universal property of the fibreproduct.
20 12 2. Preschemes Change of base: Let X, be preschemes. Then the fibeproduct X can be considered as an prescheme in a natural way: X X 15 When this is done, we say that X is obtained from X by the base change and denote it by X ( ). Note that, in the affine case, this corresponds to the extension of scalars. If X is any prescheme, by its reduction mod p, p Z +, (resp. mod p 2 and so on) we mean the basechange corresponding toz Z /(p) (resp.z Z /(p 2 ) and so on). If f : X X., g : Y Y are morphisms f and g define, in a natural way an morphism: X Y X Y, which we denote by f g or by ( f, g). When g = I :, we get a morphism: f I = f ( ) : X ( ) X ( ). 2.3 Fibres Let (X, f ) be an prescheme and s be any point. Let U be an affine open neighbourhood of s and =Γ(U, O ). If p s is the prime ideal of corresponding to s, O s, is identified with ps. Denote by k(s) the residue field of O s, = ps. The composite ps k(s) defines a morphism pec k(s) pec =U ; i.e. to say, pec k(s) is an  prescheme in a natural way. Consider now the basechange pec k(s) : p X X = X pec k(s) f q pec k(s) 16 The first projection p clearly maps X into the set f 1 (s). We
21 2.3. Fibres 13 claim that p(x )= f 1 (s) and further that, when we provide f 1 (s) with the topology induced from X, p is a homomorphism between X and f 1 (s). To prove this, it suffices to show that for every open set U in a covering of X, p is a homeomorphism from p 1 (U) onto U f 1 (s). In view of the remark (2) after Theorem (2.2.1) we may then assume that X, are affine say X= pec, = pec C. That p(x )= f 1 (s) will follow as a corollary to the following more general result. Lemma Let X = pec, Y = pec B be affine schemes over = pec C. uppose that x X, y Y lie over the same element s. Then the set E of elements z Z=X Y lying over x, y is isomorphic to pec(k(x) k( ) k(y)) (as a set). Proof. One has a homomorphismψ: B k(x) k(y) which gives C k(s) a morphism a ψ : pec k(x) k(y) Z; clearly the image of a ψ is k(s) contained in the set E=p 1 (x) q 1 (y). That a ψ is injective is seen by factoringψas follows: B x B y k(x) k(y). In order C Cs k(s) to see that a ψ is surjective one remarks that for z E the homomorphism B k(z) factors through k(x), similarly for B, therefore C we have for B k(z) a factorisation B k(x) k(y) k(z). C C k(s) Q.E.D. In the above lemma if we take B=k(s) it follows that in the diagram 17 X = X pec k(s)=pec( k(s)) C p q X= pec Y= pec B f g s = pec C
22 14 2. Preschemes the map p : X f 1 (s) is a bijection Returning to the assertion that X is homeomorphic to the fibre f 1 (s) (with the induced topology from X) we note that ifϕ:c k(s) is the natural map, then p : X X is the morphism corresponding to 1 ϕ : C k(s). To show that p carries the topology over, it is enough to show that any closed set of X, of the form V(E ), is also of the form V((1 ϕ)e) for some E. Now, any element of k(s) can be written in the form ( ) ci a i = ( ) ( C i t (a i c i ) 1 1 ) ( with a i, c i, t C. ince 1 1 ) is a unit i t t of k(s), we can take for E, the set of elements a i c i where C i a i ( c i /t ) is an element of E. Q.E.D. i Note. The fibre f 1 (s) can be given a prescheme structure through this homeomorphism p : X f 1 (s). If, in the above proof, we had taken O s /Ms n+1, instead of k(s)=o s /M s we would still have obtained homeomorphisms p n : X pec ( ) O s /Ms n+1 f 1 (s). The prescheme struc ture on f 1 (s) defined by means of p n, is known as the n th infinitesimal neighbourhood of the fibre. 2.4 ubschemes Let X be a prescheme and J a quasicoherent sheaf of ideals of O X. Then the support Y of the O X Module O X /J is closed in X and (Y, O X/J Y) has a natural structure of a prescheme. In fact, the question is purely local and we may assume X=pec. Then J is defined by an ideal I of and Y corresponds to V(I) which is surely closed. The ringed space (Y, O X/J Y) has then a natural structure of an affine scheme, namely, that of pec(/i). uch a prescheme is called a closed subscheme of X. n open subscheme is, by definition, the prescheme induced by X on an open subset
23 2.4. ubschemes 15 in a natural way. subscheme of X is a closed subscheme of an open subscheme of X subscheme may have the same basespace as X. For example, 19 one can show that there is a quasicoherent sheaf N of ideals of O X such that N x = nilradical of O x. N defines a closed subscheme Y of X, which we denote by X red and which is reduced, in the sense that the stalks O y,y of Y have no nilpotent elements. X and Y have the same base space ( and red have the same prime ideals). Consider a morphism f : X Y of preschemes. upposeϕ X : X red X,ϕ Y : Y red Y are the natural morphisms. Then amorphism f red : X red Y red making the diagram X f Y ϕ X ϕ Y X red f red Y red commutative. This corresponds to the fact that a homomorphism ϕ : B of rings defines a homomorphismϕ red : red B red such that ϕ B η η B red ϕ red B red morphism f : Z X is called an immersion if it admits a 20 factorization Z f Y j X where Y is a subscheme of X, j : Y X is the canonical inclusion and f : Z Y is an isomorphism. The immersion f is said to be closed (resp. open) if Y is a closed subscheme (resp. open subscheme) of X.
24 16 2. Preschemes Example. Let X f be an prescheme. Then, there is a natural morphism : X X X such that the diagram X I X =id X X p 1 X X f p 2 X f is commutative. is called the diagonal of f. It is an immersion. Definition morphism f : X is said to be separated (or X is said to be an scheme) if the diagonal :X X X of f is a closed immersion. prescheme X is called a scheme if the natural map X pec Z is separated. I X 21 Remark. Let Y be an affine scheme, X any prescheme and (U α ) α an affine open c over for X. One can then show that a morphism f : X Y is separated if and only if α,β, (i) U α U β is also affine (ii) Γ(U α U β,o X ) is generated as a ring by the canonical images of Γ(U α, O X ) andγ(u β, O X ). (For a proof see EG, Ch. I, Proposition (5.5.6)) Example of a prescheme which is not a scheme. Let B=k[X], C= k[y] be polynomial rings over a field k. Then pec B X and pec C Y are affine open sets of pec B and pec C respectively; the isomorphism
25 2.5. ome formal properties of morphisms 17 f (X) X m f (Y) Y m of B X onto C Y defines an isomorphism pec C Y pec B X. By recollement of pec B and pec C through this isomorphism, one gets a prescheme, which is not a scheme; in fact, condition (ii) of the proceding remark does not hold: for,γ(pec B, O ) B=k[X] andγ(pec C, O ) C= k[y]; the canonical maps from these intoγ(pec B pec C, O ) k[u, u 1 ] are given by X u, Y u and the image in each case is precisely=k[u]. 2.5 ome formal properties of morphisms (i) every immersion is separated (ii) f : X Y, g : Y Z separated g f : X Z separated. (iii) f : X Y a separated morphism f ( ) : X ( ) Y ( ) is separated for every basechange. (iv) f : X Y, f : X Y are separated morphisms f f : 22 X X Y Y is separated. (v) g f separated f is separated (vi) f separated f red separated. The above properties are not all independent. In fact, the following more general situation holds: Let P be a property of morphisms of preschemes. Consider the following propositions: (i) every closed immersion has P (ii) f : X Y has P, g : Y Z has P g f has p (iii) f : X Y is an morphism having P f ( ) : X ( ) Y ( ) has P for any basechange. (iv) f : X Y has P, f : X Y has P that f f : X X Y Y has P
26 18 2. Preschemes (v) g f has P, g separated f has P. (vi) f has P f red has P. If we suppose that (i) and (ii) hold then (iii) (iv). lso, (v), (vi) are consequences of (i), (ii) and (iii) (or (iv)). Proof. ssume (ii) and (iii). The morphism f f admits a factorization: f f X X Y Y f I X I Y f Y X 23 By (iii), the morphisms f T X and I Y f have P and so by (ii) f f also has P. On the other hand, assume (i) and (iv). I being a closed immersion, has P by (i) and so f ( )= f I has P by (iv). Now assume (i), (ii) and (iii). If g : Y Z is separated, Y Y Z Y is a closed immersion and has P by (i); by making a basechange X f Y we get a morphism X Y X Y I X Y Y X X Y which, by (iii) has Y Z Y Z property p. The projection p 2 : X Z Y Y satisfies the diagram: X ϕ X Z Y g f p 2 Z g Y i.e. to say, p 2 is obtained from g f by the basechange Y Z and so, by (iii) has P.
27 2.6. ffine morphisms 19 Finally, f : X Y is the composite of X Y I X X Y and p 2 : Z X Z Y Y and so by (ii) has P. To prove (vi) from (i), (ii), (iii) use the diagram 24 f red X red Y red ϕ X X f Y ϕ Y and the facts that the canonical morphismsϕ X,ϕ Y are closed immersions and so have P, thatϕ Y f red = f g has P and that a closed immersion is separated, then use (v). Q.E.D. We now remark that if we replace (i) of the above propositions by (i) every immersion has P, then (i), (ii), (iii) imply (v) g f has P, g has P f has P. 2.6 ffine morphisms Definition morphism f : X of preschemes is said to be affine (or X affine over ) if, for every affine open U, f 1 (U) is affine in X. It is enough to check that for an affine open cover (U α ) of, the f 1 (U α ) are affine uppose that B is a quasicoherent O lgebra. Let (U α ) be an affine open cover of ; set α =Γ(U α, O ), B α =Γ(U α, B) and X α = pec B α. The homomorphism α B α defines a morphism 25 f α : X α U α ; the X α s then patch up together to give an prescheme X f ; this prescheme X is affine over, is such that f α (O X ) B, and is determined, by this property, uniquely upto an isomorphism. We denote it by pec B. conversely, every affine prescheme is obtained
28 20 2. Preschemes as pec B, for some quasicoherent O lgebra B. (For details, see EG Ch. II, Proposition (1.4.3)). Remarks. (a) ny affine morphism is separated. (Recall the remark at the end of (2.4.2).) (b) If is an affine scheme, a morphism f : X is affine X is an affine scheme. (c) The formal properties (i) to (vi) of (2.5) hold, when P is the property of being affine. (d) uppose X h Y is an morphism. If f, g are the structural morphisms of X, Y resply, the homomorphism O Y h (O X ) defined by h, given an O morphism (h) : g (O Y ) g (h (O X ))= f (O X ); then we have a natural map: Hom (X, Y) Hom O (g (O Y ) f (O X )) (the latter in the sense of O lgebras) defined by h (h). If Y is affine over, it can be shown that this natural map is a bijection. (EG Ch II, Proposition (1.2.7)). (lso, compare with remark (1.6.4) (c) for affine schemes, and with remark (2.1.3)) The finiteness theorem Definition morphism f : X Y of preschemes is said to be of finite type, if, for every affine open set U of Y, f 1 (U) can be written as f 1 (U)= n V α, with each V α affine open in X and eachγ(v α, O X ) a α=1 finite typeγ(u, O Y )algebra. It is again enough to check this for an affine open cover of Y. n affine morphism f : X Y is of finite type the quasicoherent O Y lgebra f α (O X ) is an O Y lgebra of finite type. In particular, a morphism f : pec B pec is of finite type B is a finite type algebra (i.e. is finitely generated as algebra).
29 2.7. The finiteness theorem 21 Definition morphism f : X is universally closed if, for every basechange, the morphism f ( ) : X is a closed map in the topological sense. Definition morphism f is proper if (i) f is separated (ii) f is of finite type and (iii) f is universally closed. The formal properties of (2.5) hold then P is the property of being proper. Definition prescheme Y is locally noetherian, if every y Y has an affine open neighbourhood pec B, with B noetherian. It is said to be noetherian, if it can be written as Y= n Y i where the Y i are affine 27 open sets such that theγ(y i, O Y ) are noetherian rings. If f : X Y is a morphism of finite type and Y is locally noetherian, then X is also locally noetherian Let (X, O X ) and (Y, O Y ) be ringed spaces and f a morphism from X to Y. Let F be an O X Module. We then define, for every q Z +, a presheaf of modules on Y by defining: U H q ( f 1 (U), F ) for every open U Y (ee EG Ch 0, III 12). The sheaf that this presheaf defines on Y is called the q th direct image of F and is denoted by R q f (F ). Theorem Let X, Y be preschemes, Y locally noetherian, and f a proper morphism from X to Y. Then, if F is any coherent O X Module, the direct images R q f (F ) are all coherent O Y Modules. (For a proof see EG Ch. III, Theorem (3.2.1)). This is the theorem of finiteness for proper morphisms. i=1
30
31 Chapter 3 Étale Morphisms and Étale Coverings Throughout this chapter, by a prescheme we will mean a locally noethe 28 rian prescheme and by a morphism, a morphism of finite type (unless it is clear from the context that the morphism is not of finite type, e.g., peco s,, pec pec Â, a noetherian local ring). Definition morphism f : X is said to be unramified at a point x Xif (i) M f (x) O x = M x, (ii) k(x)/k( f (x)) is a finite separable extension. Definition morphism f : X is said to be flat at a point x X if the local homomorphism O f (x) O x is flat (i.e., O x, considered as an O f (x) module is flat; note that since the homomorphism O f (x) O x is local, O x will be faithfully O f (x) flat). Definition morphism f : X is said to be étale at a point x X if it is both unramified and flat at x. We say that f : X is unramified (resp. flat, étale) if it is unramified (resp. flat, étale) at every x X. Remarks (1) n unramified morphism X f is étale at x X Ô f (x) Ôx is flat. 23
FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES
FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES BRIAN OSSERMAN 1. Fiber products and Zariski sheaves We recall the definition of a fiber product: Definition 1.1. Let C be a category, and X, Y, Z objects of C. Fix also
More informationLifting abelian schemes: theorems of SerreTate and Grothendieck
Lifting abelian schemes: theorems of SerreTate and Grothendieck Gabriel Dospinescu Remark 0.1. J ai décidé d écrire ces notes en anglais, car il y a trop d accents auxquels il faut faire gaffe... 1 The
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Keerthi Madapusi
Algebraic Geometry Keerthi Madapusi Contents Chapter 1. Schemes 5 1. Spec of a Ring 5 2. Schemes 11 3. The Affine Communication Lemma 13 4. A Criterion for Affineness 15 5. Irreducibility and Connectedness
More information3. Prime and maximal ideals. 3.1. Definitions and Examples.
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 5 3.1. Definitions and Examples. 3. Prime and maximal ideals Definition. An ideal P in a ring A is called prime if P A and if for every pair x, y of elements in A\P we have xy P. Equivalently,
More informationA result of Gabber. by A.J. de Jong
A result of Gabber by A.J. de Jong 1 The result Let X be a scheme endowed with an ample invertible sheaf L. See EGA II, Definition 4.5.3. In particular, X is supposed quasicompact and separated. 1.1 Theorem.
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Discrete valuation rings: Dimension 1 Noetherian regular local rings 1 Last day, we discussed the Zariski tangent space, and saw that it
More informationIf I and J are graded ideals, then since Ĩ, J are ideal sheaves, there is a canonical homomorphism J OX. It is equal to the composite
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 2.5 2.9 2.5. Sheaf associated to a graded module. (2.5.1). If M is a graded S module, then M (f) is an S (f) module, giving a quasicoherent sheaf M (f) on Spec(S
More informationNOTES ON CATEGORIES AND FUNCTORS
NOTES ON CATEGORIES AND FUNCTORS These notes collect basic definitions and facts about categories and functors that have been mentioned in the Homological Algebra course. For further reading about category
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.
MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. Valuation rings (and nonsingular points of curves) 1 1.1. Completions 2 1.2. A big result from commutative algebra 3 Problem sets back.
More informationGroup Theory. Contents
Group Theory Contents Chapter 1: Review... 2 Chapter 2: Permutation Groups and Group Actions... 3 Orbits and Transitivity... 6 Specific Actions The Right regular and coset actions... 8 The Conjugation
More informationEXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010
EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010 EYAL Z. GOREN (1) Let G be a group and H Z(G) a subgroup such that G/H is cyclic. Prove that G is abelian. Conclude that every group of order p 2 (p a prime
More informationSEMINAR NOTES: GBUNDLES, STACKS AND BG (SEPT. 15, 2009)
SEMINAR NOTES: GBUNDLES, STACKS AND (SEPT. 15, 2009) DENNIS GAITSGORY 1. Gbundles 1.1. Let G be an affine algebraic group over a ground field k. We assume that k is algebraically closed. Definition 1.2.
More informationThe Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
More informationProof. The map. G n i. where d is the degree of D.
7. Divisors Definition 7.1. We say that a scheme X is regular in codimension one if every local ring of dimension one is regular, that is, the quotient m/m 2 is one dimensional, where m is the unique maximal
More informationSolutions A ring A is called a Boolean ring if x 2 = x for all x A.
1. A ring A is called a Boolean ring if x 2 = x for all x A. (a) Let E be a set and 2 E its power set. Show that a Boolean ring structure is defined on 2 E by setting AB = A B, and A + B = (A B c ) (B
More informationit is easy to see that α = a
21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationCommutative Algebra seminar talk
Commutative Algebra seminar talk Reeve Garrett May 22, 2015 1 Ultrafilters Definition 1.1 Given an infinite set W, a collection U of subsets of W which does not contain the empty set and is closed under
More informationIntroduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points
Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a
More informationChapter 13: Basic ring theory
Chapter 3: Basic ring theory Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 42, Spring 24 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 3: Basic ring
More informationMATH32062 Notes. 1 Affine algebraic varieties. 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties
MATH32062 Notes 1 Affine algebraic varieties 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties We want to define an algebraic variety as the solution set of a collection of polynomial equations, or equivalently,
More informationRevision of ring theory
CHAPTER 1 Revision of ring theory 1.1. Basic definitions and examples In this chapter we will revise and extend some of the results on rings that you have studied on previous courses. A ring is an algebraic
More informationLinear Algebra. A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple. such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold:
Linear Algebra A vector space (over R) is an ordered quadruple (V, 0, α, µ) such that V is a set; 0 V ; and the following eight axioms hold: α : V V V and µ : R V V ; (i) α(α(u, v), w) = α(u, α(v, w)),
More informationON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS
ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for
More informationFIBRATION SEQUENCES AND PULLBACK SQUARES. Contents. 2. Connectivity and fiber sequences. 3
FIRTION SEQUENES ND PULLK SQURES RY MLKIEWIH bstract. We lay out some foundational facts about fibration sequences and pullback squares of topological spaces. We pay careful attention to connectivity ranges
More informationA CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE
A CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE DANIEL A. RAMRAS In these notes we present a construction of the universal cover of a path connected, locally path connected, and semilocally simply
More informationI. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES
I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called
More informationResearch Article On the Rank of Elliptic Curves in Elementary Cubic Extensions
Numbers Volume 2015, Article ID 501629, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/501629 Research Article On the Rank of Elliptic Curves in Elementary Cubic Extensions Rintaro Kozuma College of International
More informationApplying this to X = A n K it follows that Cl(U) = 0. So we get an exact sequence
3. Divisors on toric varieties We start with computing the class group of a toric variety. Recall that the class group is the group of Weil divisors modulo linear equivalence. We denote the class group
More informationA number field is a field of finite degree over Q. By the Primitive Element Theorem, any number
Number Fields Introduction A number field is a field of finite degree over Q. By the Primitive Element Theorem, any number field K = Q(α) for some α K. The minimal polynomial Let K be a number field and
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear
More informationMath 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick
Math 231b Lecture 35 G. Quick 35. Lecture 35: Sphere bundles and the Adams conjecture 35.1. Sphere bundles. Let X be a connected finite cell complex. We saw that the Jhomomorphism could be defined by
More informationGROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV
GROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV We will associate a certain algebra to a finite group and prove that it is semisimple. Then we will apply Wedderburn s theory to its study. Definition 0.1. Let G be a finite
More informationHomological Algebra  Problem Set 3
Homological Algebra  Problem Set 3 Problem 1. Let R be a ring. (1) Show that an Rmodule M is projective if and only if there exists a module M and a free module F such that F = M M (we say M is a summand
More informationFactoring of Prime Ideals in Extensions
Chapter 4 Factoring of Prime Ideals in Extensions 4. Lifting of Prime Ideals Recall the basic AKLB setup: A is a Dedekind domain with fraction field K, L is a finite, separable extension of K of degree
More informationChapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.
Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS
SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS Ivan Kolář Abstract. Let F be a fiber product preserving bundle functor on the category FM m of the proper base order r. We deduce that the rth
More informationSets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces
Communications in Mathematical Physics ManuscriptNr. (will be inserted by hand later) Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Stefan BechtluftSachs, Marco Hien Naturwissenschaftliche
More informationIdeal Class Group and Units
Chapter 4 Ideal Class Group and Units We are now interested in understanding two aspects of ring of integers of number fields: how principal they are (that is, what is the proportion of principal ideals
More informationCourse 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces
Course 421: Algebraic Topology Section 1: Topological Spaces David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1988 2008 Contents 1 Topological Spaces 1 1.1 Continuity and Topological Spaces...............
More informationCHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY
CHAPTER 1 BASIC TOPOLOGY Topology, sometimes referred to as the mathematics of continuity, or rubber sheet geometry, or the theory of abstract topological spaces, is all of these, but, above all, it is
More informationYan Zhao. 27 November 2013 / 4 December 2013
Géométrie Algébrique et Géométrie Analytique Yan Zhao 27 November 2013 / 4 December 2013 In these notes, we give a quick introduction to the main classical results in the theory of Géométrie Algébrique
More informationFundamental Groups of Schemes. Lei Yang
Fundamental Groups of Schemes Master thesis under the supervision of Jilong Tong Lei Yang Universite Bordeaux 1 Email address: lyang0176@gmailcom Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 2 Galois categories 5
More informationGalois Theory III. 3.1. Splitting fields.
Galois Theory III. 3.1. Splitting fields. We know how to construct a field extension L of a given field K where a given irreducible polynomial P (X) K[X] has a root. We need a field extension of K where
More informationPOLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS
POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).
More informationQUOTIENTS IN ALGEBRAIC AND SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY
QUOTIENTS IN ALGEBRAIC AND SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY VICTORIA HOSKINS 1. Introduction In this course we study methods for constructing quotients of group actions in algebraic and symplectic geometry and the
More information7. Some irreducible polynomials
7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of
More informationAlgebraic KTheory of Ring Spectra (Lecture 19)
Algebraic KTheory of ing Spectra (Lecture 19) October 17, 2014 Let be an associative ring spectrum (here by associative we mean A or associative up to coherent homotopy; homotopy associativity is not
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Notes for a class. taught at the University of Kaiserslautern 2002/2003
Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Notes for a class taught at the University of Kaiserslautern 2002/2003 CONTENTS 0. Introduction 1 0.1. What is algebraic geometry? 1 0.2. Exercises 6 1. Affine varieties
More informationGROUPS ACTING ON A SET
GROUPS ACTING ON A SET MATH 435 SPRING 2012 NOTES FROM FEBRUARY 27TH, 2012 1. Left group actions Definition 1.1. Suppose that G is a group and S is a set. A left (group) action of G on S is a rule for
More informationFACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z
FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization
More informationNonunique factorization of polynomials over residue class rings of the integers
Comm. Algebra 39(4) 2011, pp 1482 1490 Nonunique factorization of polynomials over residue class rings of the integers Christopher Frei and Sophie Frisch Abstract. We investigate nonunique factorization
More informationRow Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms
Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008) Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms David Eisenbud & Bernd Ulrich Affectionately dedicated to Mel Hochster, who has been an inspiration to us for many years, on the occasion
More informationFUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied
More informationADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS WITH IDENTITY
ADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS WITH IDENTITY SIMION BREAZ AND GRIGORE CĂLUGĂREANU Abstract. A ring with identity exists on a torsion Abelian group exactly when the group is bounded. The additive groups of torsionfree
More information1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) 2 + + (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain
Notes on realclosed fields These notes develop the algebraic background needed to understand the model theory of realclosed fields. To understand these notes, a standard graduate course in algebra is
More informationClassification of Cartan matrices
Chapter 7 Classification of Cartan matrices In this chapter we describe a classification of generalised Cartan matrices This classification can be compared as the rough classification of varieties in terms
More informationINTRODUCTORY ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY
INTRODUCTORY ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY EHUD DE SHALIT, HEBREW UNIVERSITY, SPRING 2010 1. Affine algebraic sets Classical algebraic geometry deals, initially, with affine algebraic sets, i.e. subsets of affine
More informationLinear Maps. Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling (February 5, 2007)
MAT067 University of California, Davis Winter 2007 Linear Maps Isaiah Lankham, Bruno Nachtergaele, Anne Schilling (February 5, 2007) As we have discussed in the lecture on What is Linear Algebra? one of
More informationIntroduction to finite fields
Introduction to finite fields Topics in Finite Fields (Fall 2013) Rutgers University Swastik Kopparty Last modified: Monday 16 th September, 2013 Welcome to the course on finite fields! This is aimed at
More informationSets and functions. {x R : x > 0}.
Sets and functions 1 Sets The language of sets and functions pervades mathematics, and most of the important operations in mathematics turn out to be functions or to be expressible in terms of functions.
More informationDEFORMATIONS OF MODULES OF MAXIMAL GRADE AND THE HILBERT SCHEME AT DETERMINANTAL SCHEMES.
DEFORMATIONS OF MODULES OF MAXIMAL GRADE AND THE HILBERT SCHEME AT DETERMINANTAL SCHEMES. JAN O. KLEPPE Abstract. Let R be a polynomial ring and M a finitely generated graded Rmodule of maximal grade
More informationThe determinant of a skewsymmetric matrix is a square. This can be seen in small cases by direct calculation: 0 a. 12 a. a 13 a 24 a 14 a 23 a 14
4 Symplectic groups In this and the next two sections, we begin the study of the groups preserving reflexive sesquilinear forms or quadratic forms. We begin with the symplectic groups, associated with
More information(a) Write each of p and q as a polynomial in x with coefficients in Z[y, z]. deg(p) = 7 deg(q) = 9
Homework #01, due 1/20/10 = 9.1.2, 9.1.4, 9.1.6, 9.1.8, 9.2.3 Additional problems for study: 9.1.1, 9.1.3, 9.1.5, 9.1.13, 9.2.1, 9.2.2, 9.2.4, 9.2.5, 9.2.6, 9.3.2, 9.3.3 9.1.1 (This problem was not assigned
More informationOn The Existence Of Flips
On The Existence Of Flips Hacon and McKernan s paper, arxiv alggeom/0507597 Brian Lehmann, February 2007 1 Introduction References: Hacon and McKernan s paper, as above. Kollár and Mori, Birational Geometry
More informationOnline publication date: 11 March 2010 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
This article was downloaded by: [Modoi, George Ciprian] On: 12 March 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 919828804] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and
More informationMATH 131 SOLUTION SET, WEEK 12
MATH 131 SOLUTION SET, WEEK 12 ARPON RAKSIT AND ALEKSANDAR MAKELOV 1. Normalisers We first claim H N G (H). Let h H. Since H is a subgroup, for all k H we have hkh 1 H and h 1 kh H. Since h(h 1 kh)h 1
More informationCHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC
CHAPTER 5: MODULAR ARITHMETIC LECTURE NOTES FOR MATH 378 (CSUSM, SPRING 2009). WAYNE AITKEN 1. Introduction In this chapter we will consider congruence modulo m, and explore the associated arithmetic called
More informationThe fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992), 33 37) Bart de Smit
The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free Bart de Smit The fundamental group of the Hawaiian earring is not free (International Journal of Algebra and Computation Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992),
More informationChapter 7. Homotopy. 7.1 Basic concepts of homotopy. Example: z dz. z dz = but
Chapter 7 Homotopy 7. Basic concepts of homotopy Example: but γ z dz = γ z dz γ 2 z dz γ 3 z dz. Why? The domain of /z is C 0}. We can deform γ continuously into γ 2 without leaving C 0}. Intuitively,
More informationBasic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011
Basic Concepts of Point Set Topology Notes for OU course Math 4853 Spring 2011 A. Miller 1. Introduction. The definitions of metric space and topological space were developed in the early 1900 s, largely
More information11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z
11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(
More informationANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories
ANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories Julia Ramos González February 7, 2014 Abstract These notes were prepared for the first session of "Dimension functions" of ANAGRAMS seminar. The goal is to
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS
Actes, Congrès intern. Math., 1970. Tome 2, p. 47 à 51. COHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS by Daniel QUILLEN * This is a report of research done at the Institute for Advanced Study the past year. It includes some general
More informationComputer Algebra for Computer Engineers
p.1/14 Computer Algebra for Computer Engineers Preliminaries Priyank Kalla Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Utah, Salt Lake City p.2/14 Notation R: Real Numbers Q: Fractions
More informationAppendix A. Appendix. A.1 Algebra. Fields and Rings
Appendix A Appendix A.1 Algebra Algebra is the foundation of algebraic geometry; here we collect some of the basic algebra on which we rely. We develop some algebraic background that is needed in the text.
More information6. Metric spaces. In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. d : X X [0, )
6. Metric spaces In this section we review the basic facts about metric spaces. Definitions. A metric on a nonempty set X is a map with the following properties: d : X X [0, ) (i) If x, y X are points
More informationQuadratic Equations in Finite Fields of Characteristic 2
Quadratic Equations in Finite Fields of Characteristic 2 Klaus Pommerening May 2000 english version February 2012 Quadratic equations over fields of characteristic 2 are solved by the well known quadratic
More informationLINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN
LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1997, 2008 This chapter is available free to all individuals, on understanding that it is not to be used for financial gain, and may be downloaded and/or photocopied,
More information50. Splitting Fields. 50. Splitting Fields 165
50. Splitting Fields 165 1. We should note that Q(x) is an algebraic closure of Q(x). We know that is transcendental over Q. Therefore, p must be transcendental over Q, for if it were algebraic, then (
More informationModule MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013
Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997 2013 Contents A Cyclotomic Polynomials 79 A.1 Minimum Polynomials of Roots of
More informationGalois representations with open image
Galois representations with open image Ralph Greenberg University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA May 7th, 2011 Introduction This talk will be about representations of the absolute Galois group
More informationRINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY
RINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY IRVING KAPLANSKY 1. Introduction. In connection with his investigation of projective planes, M. Hall [2, Theorem 6.2]* proved the following theorem: a division ring D in
More information4.1 Modules, Homomorphisms, and Exact Sequences
Chapter 4 Modules We always assume that R is a ring with unity 1 R. 4.1 Modules, Homomorphisms, and Exact Sequences A fundamental example of groups is the symmetric group S Ω on a set Ω. By Cayley s Theorem,
More informationLecture Notes for the Summer School on Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey June 2 10, 2014
Lecture Notes for the Summer School on Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory Galatasaray University, Istanbul, Turkey June 2 10, 2014 INTRODUCTION TO SHEAVES LORING W. TU Introduced in the 1940s by Leray
More informationModule MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions
Module MA1S11 (Calculus) Michaelmas Term 2016 Section 3: Functions D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 2016 Contents 3 Functions 43 3.1 Functions between Sets...................... 43 3.2 Injective
More informationDEFINITION OF PURE HODGE MODULES
DEFINITION OF PURE HODGE MODULES DONGKWAN KIM 1. Previously in the Seminar... 1 2. Nearby and Vanishing Cycles 2 3. Strict Support 4 4. Compatibility of Nearby and Vanishing Cycles and the Filtration 5
More informationIntroduction to Modern Algebra
Introduction to Modern Algebra David Joyce Clark University Version 0.0.6, 3 Oct 2008 1 1 Copyright (C) 2008. ii I dedicate this book to my friend and colleague Arthur Chou. Arthur encouraged me to write
More informationCourse 221: Analysis Academic year , First Semester
Course 221: Analysis Academic year 200708, First Semester David R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1989 2007 Contents 1 Basic Theorems of Real Analysis 1 1.1 The Least Upper Bound Principle................
More informationDerived categories of coherent sheaves and equivalences between them
Russian Math. Surveys 58:3 511 591 Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 58:3 89 172 c 2003 RAS(DoM) and LMS DOI 10.1070/RM2003v058n03ABEH000629 To the blessed memory of Andrei Nikolaevich Tyurin Derived categories of coherent
More informationZORN S LEMMA AND SOME APPLICATIONS
ZORN S LEMMA AND SOME APPLICATIONS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Zorn s lemma is a result in set theory that appears in proofs of some nonconstructive existence theorems throughout mathematics. We will
More information6. Fields I. 1. Adjoining things
6. Fields I 6.1 Adjoining things 6.2 Fields of fractions, fields of rational functions 6.3 Characteristics, finite fields 6.4 Algebraic field extensions 6.5 Algebraic closures 1. Adjoining things The general
More informationUnique Factorization
Unique Factorization Waffle Mathcamp 2010 Throughout these notes, all rings will be assumed to be commutative. 1 Factorization in domains: definitions and examples In this class, we will study the phenomenon
More informationON THE RATIONAL REAL JACOBIAN CONJECTURE
UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE ACTA MATHEMATICA doi: FASCICULUS LI, 2013 ON THE RATIONAL REAL JACOBIAN CONJECTURE by L. Andrew Campbell Abstract. Jacobian conjectures (that nonsingular implies a global inverse)
More informationMath 225A, Differential Topology: Homework 3
Math 225A, Differential Topology: Homework 3 Ian Coley October 17, 2013 Problem 1.4.7. Suppose that y is a regular value of f : X Y, where X is compact and dim X = dim Y. Show that f 1 (y) is a finite
More informationIntegral Domains. As always in this course, a ring R is understood to be a commutative ring with unity.
Integral Domains As always in this course, a ring R is understood to be a commutative ring with unity. 1 First definitions and properties Definition 1.1. Let R be a ring. A divisor of zero or zero divisor
More informationNOTES ON DEDEKIND RINGS
NOTES ON DEDEKIND RINGS J. P. MAY Contents 1. Fractional ideals 1 2. The definition of Dedekind rings and DVR s 2 3. Characterizations and properties of DVR s 3 4. Completions of discrete valuation rings
More informationMathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering. Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson
Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering Notes for the course MSM1F3 Dr. R. A. Wilson October 1996 Chapter 1 Logic Lecture no. 1. We introduce the concept of a proposition, which is a statement
More informationsome algebra prelim solutions
some algebra prelim solutions David Morawski August 19, 2012 Problem (Spring 2008, #5). Show that f(x) = x p x + a is irreducible over F p whenever a F p is not zero. Proof. First, note that f(x) has no
More information