Non-unique factorization of polynomials over residue class rings of the integers

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Non-unique factorization of polynomials over residue class rings of the integers"

Transcription

1 Comm. Algebra 39(4) 2011, pp Non-unique factorization of polynomials over residue class rings of the integers Christopher Frei and Sophie Frisch Abstract. We investigate non-unique factorization of polynomials in Z p n[x] into irreducibles. As a Noetherian ring whose zero-divisors are contained in the Jacobson radical, Z p n[x] is atomic. We reduce the question of factoring arbitrary non-zero polynomials into irreducibles to the problem of factoring monic polynomials into monic irreducibles. The multiplicative monoid of monic polynomials of Z p n[x] is a direct sum of monoids corresponding to irreducible polynomials in Z p [x], and we show that each of these monoids has infinite elasticity. Moreover, for every m N, there exists in each of these monoids a product of 2 irreducibles that can also be represented as a product of m irreducibles. Keywords: polynomial, finite ring, non-unique factorization, elasticity, zerodivisor, monoid. MSC 2000: Primary 13M10; Secondary 13P05, 11T06, 20M Introduction Polynomials with coefficients in Z p n = Z/p n Z, p prime, n 2, have been investigated quite a lot with respect to the polynomial functions they define [6, 9, 4]. Comparatively little is known about the multiplicative monoid of non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x]. McDonald [7] and Wan [8] list a few properties concerning uniqueness of certain kinds of factorizations of polynomials in Z p n[x]. At the same time, factorization into irreducibles is manifestly non-unique. In this paper, we investigate non-uniqueness of factorization of polynomials in Z p n[x] into irreducibles, in the spirit of [5]. Throughout this paper, p is a fixed prime and n 2. Here is an example of the phenomena we will study. Consider the identity in Z p n[x]: (x m + p n 1 )(x m + p) = x m (x m + p n 1 + p). Assuming for the moment that every element of Z p n[x] has a factorization into irreducible elements (cf. Corollary 2.9), we note that (x m + p n 1 ) is a product of at most n 1 irreducibles, and that (x m +p) is irreducible. This is so because both 1

2 polynomials represent a power of x in Z p [x]. By unique factorization in Z p [x], each of their factors in Z p n[x] (apart from units) also represents a power of x in Z p [x]. (We have used the fact that a polynomial in Z p n[x] is a unit if and only if it maps to a unit in Z p [x] under canonical projection.) Since every non-unit factor in Z p n[x] of (x m + p n 1 ) or (x m + p) represents a power of x in Z p [x], the constant coefficient of every such factor is divisible by p. On the other hand, the constant coefficient of (x m +p n 1 ) is divisible by no higher power of p than p n 1, so it cannot be a product of more than n 1 non-unit polynomials, and (x m + p) cannot be a product of more than one non-unit in Z p n[x]. We have seen that for arbitrary m N, there exists in Z p n[x] a product of at most n irreducibles that is also representable as a product of more than m irreducibles. We now establish some notation: 1.1. Definition. We denote p-adic valuation on Q by v and extend v to Q(x) by defining v(f) = min k v(a k ) for f = k a kx k Z[x], and v(f/g) = v(f) v(g). This gives a surjective mapping v: Z[x] N 0 { }. We denote by (N n,+, ) the ordered monoid with elements 0, 1,..., n 1, resulting from factoring (N 0 { },+, ) by the congruence relation that identifies all values greater or equal n, including. By abuse of notation, we still use v for the surjective mapping v: Z p n[x] N n obtained by factoring p-adic valuation v: Z[x] N 0 { } by the above congruence relation. The mapping v: Z p n[x] N n behaves like a valuation, except that (N n,+, ) is not a group (nor can it be extended to a group, as it is not cancellative) Remark. v: Z p n[x] N n satisfies (i) v(f) = f = 0 (ii) v(f + g) min(v(f),v(g)) (iii) v(f g) = v(f) + v(g) We will write p for a prime in Z as well as for its residue class in Z p n or Z p n[x]. This should not cause any confusion; we are always going to specify which ring we are talking about. In the remainder of this section, we review a few well-known facts about Z p n[x] Fact. For f Z p n[x], the following are equivalent: (a) v(f) > 0, i.e., all coefficients of f are divisible (in Z p n) by p. (b) f is nilpotent. (c) f is a zero-divisor. 2

3 Proof. This follows from the properties of v: Z p n[x] N n mentioned in Definition. Let R be a commutative ring. (i) Nil(R) denotes the nilradical of R, i.e., the intersection of all prime ideals of R. (ii) J(R) denotes the Jacobson radical of R, i.e., the intersection of all maximal ideals of R. (iii) Z(R) denotes the set of zero-divisors of R. (iv) U(R) denotes the group of units of R. As we all know, the intersection of all prime ideals of a commutative ring coincides with the set of nilpotent elements: Nil(R) = P = {r R n N r n = 0}. P prime 1.5. Fact. Nil(Z p n[x]) = J(Z p n[x]) = (p) = Z(Z p n[x]) Proof. Since the maximal ideals of Z p n[x] are precisely the ideals (p,f) with f representing an irreducible polynomial in Z p [x], we see J(Z p n[x])=(p). We already know (p) = Nil(Z p n[x]) = Z(Z p n[x]) from Fact Fact. Let R be a commutative ring. The units of R[x] are precisely the polynomials a 0 +a 1 x+...+a n x n with a 0 a unit of R and a k nilpotent for k > 0. Proof. If f is a unit then its image under projection to (R/P)[x] is a unit for every prime ideal P of R. Therefore, a 0 is not in any P and hence a unit; and for k > 0, a k is in every P and therefore nilpotent. Conversely, if f = a 0 + g with a 0 a unit of R and all coefficients of g in the intersection of all prime ideals of R, then g is in every prime ideal of R[x] and hence f = a 0 + g is in no prime ideal of R[x] and therefore a unit of R[x] Corollary. Let p be a prime and n 1. Then U(Z p n[x]) consists of precisely the polynomials f = a 0 +a 1 x+...+a n x n such that (in Z p n) p a0 and p ak for k > 0. It follows that a polynomial in Z[x] represents a unit in Z p n[x] for some n 1 if and only if it represents a unit in Z p n[x] for all n. 3

4 2. Different concepts of irreducibility in rings with zero-divisors Various facts about irreducible and prime elements that are clear in integral domains tend to become messy and obfuscated as soon as zero-divisors are involved. We will see, however, that everything works just as smoothly as in integral domains if all zero-divisors are contained in the Jacobson radical. For an in-depth investigation of factorization in rings with zero-divisors see [2, 3, 1]. The very natural concepts defined in this section appear in the literature ([2, 3, 1] and their references) under varying names. Our choice of names has been motivated by a desire to define associated and irreducible for commutative rings just like they are usually defined for integral domains and to reflect the existence of a group of stronger concepts (associated, irreducible, atomic), and a parallel group of weaker concepts, with analogous relationships between the concepts inside each group. R is always a commutative ring with identity Definition. If c R is a non-zero non-unit then we say that c is weakly irreducible if for all a, b R c = ab = c a or c b and that c is irreducible if for all a, b R c = ab = b is a unit or a is a unit. A non-zero non-unit c is called prime if for all a,b R c ab = c a or c b 2.2. Definition. Let a,b R. We call a and b weakly associated if a b and b a (or equivalently, if (a) = (b)). We call a and b associated if there exists a unit u R such that a = bu. It is clear that irreducible implies weakly irreducible, that associated implies weakly associated, and that both converses hold in integral domains. Also, prime implies irreducible in integral domains. We now consider a class of commutative rings properly containing the class of integral domains in which the implications mentioned above still hold Definition. Let R be a commutative ring. We say that R is a ring with harmless zero-divisors, if Z(R) 1 U(R) = {1 u u a unit of R}. (These are the rings called présimplifiable by Bouvier (cf. [2]).) 4

5 2.4. Lemma. ([2]). Let R be a ring with harmless zero-divisors and a,b,c,u,v R. Then (1) if a 0, a = bu and b = av then u,v are units; (2) a,b are weakly associated if and only if they are associated; (3) c is weakly irreducible if and only if c is irreducible; (4) if c is prime then c is irreducible. Proof. (1) a = avu; therefore a(1 vu) = 0, which makes (1 vu) a zero-divisor. Now 1 vu = 1 w for some unit w; hence vu = w and u,v are units. (2), (3) and (4) follow from (1) Corollary. If a commutative ring R satisfies Z(R) J(R) then the statements of Lemma 2.4 hold for R. In particular, they hold for Z p n[x]. Proof. It is easy to see that J(R) 1 U(R) holds in every commutative ring. Therefore every ring satisfying Z(R) J(R) is a ring with harmless zero-divisors. In particular, Z p n[x] is a ring with harmless zero-divisors, since Z(Z p n[x])=j(z p n[x]) by Fact Definition. Let R be a commutative ring. R is called atomic if every non-zero non-unit is a product of irreducible elements. We call R weakly atomic if every non-zero non-unit is a product of weakly irreducible elements. If one examines the usual proof that an integral domain with ACC for principal ideals is atomic, one finds that it shows that any commutative ring with ACC for principal ideals is weakly atomic. Namely, suppose there exists an element s in the set S of those non-zero non-units of R that do not factor into weakly irreducible elements. Then s is not weakly irreducible, so there exist a,b with s = ab and s a, s b. Such a,b must be non-zero non-units, and at least one of them is in S; say a S. As a s and s a, we have (s) (a). By iteration we get an infinite ascending chain of principal ideals. We have shown: 2.7. Lemma. ([2] Thm. 3.2). If R is a commutative ring satisfying ACC for principal ideals then R is weakly atomic. Combining Lemmas 2.4 and 2.7, we obtain 2.8. Lemma. ([2]). Every commutative ring with harmless zero-divisors satisfying ACC for principal ideals is atomic; in particular, every Noetherian ring with harmless zero-divisors is atomic. In particular, Lemma 2.8 applies to Z p n[x]: 5

6 2.9. Corollary. Z p n[x] is atomic. 3. Uniqueness of factorization In the previous section we have seen that every non-zero non-unit of Z p n[x] is a product of irreducibles. Step by step we now reduce the task of factoring arbitrary elements of Z p n[x]: first to factoring non-zerodivisors, then to factoring monic polynomials and, finally, to factoring monic primary polynomials. This is a matter of applying well-known facts of the uniqueness kind from [7] or [8]. It is only in the next section, concerned with factoring monic primary polynomials, that non-uniqueness of factorization comes into play. Arbitrary polynomials to non-zerodivisors Lemma. Let p be a prime and n 2. For f Z p n[x], the following are equivalent: (1) f = pu for some unit u of Z p n[x]. (2) f is prime. (3) f is irreducible and a zero-divisor. Proof. (1 2). Let v: Z p n[x] N n be p-adic valuation as defined in 1.1. Since v(p) = 1, additivity of v (1.2) implies that p is prime. Therefore every element associated to p is prime. (2 3). By Corollary 2.5, prime elements of Z p n[x] are irreducible. If c is prime, then (c) Nil(Z p n[x]) = (p); so c p and therefore c and p are associated. As p is a zero-divisor, so is c. (3 1). If c is a zero-divisor, then c Z(Z p n[x]) = (p), meaning c = pv for some v. If, furthermore, c is irreducible, then v must be a unit Fact. Let f Z p n[x], f 0. (i) There exists a non-zerodivisor g Z p n[x], and 0 k < n, such that f = p k g. Furthermore, k is uniquely determined by k = v(f), and g is unique modulo (p n k ). (ii) In every factorization of f into irreducibles, exactly v(f) of the irreducible factors are associates of p. Proof. (i) follows from Fact 1.3 and the definition of p-adic valuation. (ii) follows from (i) and the fact that p is prime in Z p n[x] (by Lemma 3.1). 6

7 Nonzerodivisors to monic polynomials Remark. ([7], Thm. XIII.6). Every non-zerodivisor f Z p n[x] is uniquely representable as f = ug, with u a unit of Z p n[x] and g monic. The degree of g is deg f, where f is the image of f in Z p [x] under canonical projection. Actually, McDonald [7] only shows the existence of g and u in 3.3, but uniqueness is easy: suppose ug = vh with u,v units, g,h monic. Then v 1 ug = h. As g,h are monic, so is v 1 u. By 1.7, the only monic unit of Z p n[x] is 1, however, so u = v and g = h. Applying 3.3 to the irreducible factors of a non-zerodivisor of Z p n[x], we obtain: 3.4. Proposition. Let f Z p n[x], not a zero-divisor, and u and g the unique unit and monic polynomial, respectively, in Z p n[x] with f =ug. For every factorization f = c 1... c k into irreducibles, there exist uniquely determined monic irreducible d 1,...,d k Z p n[x] and units v 1,...,v k in Z p n[x] with c i = v i d i, u = v 1... v k and g = d 1... d k. By Proposition 3.4, we have reduced the question of factoring non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x] into irreducibles to the question of factoring monic polynomials into monic irreducibles. As there are only finitely many monic polynomials of each degree in Z p n[x], we also see that every non-zerodivisor of Z p n[x] has (up to associates) only finitely many factorizations into irreducibles. Monic polynomials to primary monic polynomials Lemma. Let f Z p n[x], not a zero-divisor. Then (f) is a primary ideal of Z p n[x] if and only if the image of f under the canonical projection π: Z p n[x] Z p [x] is associated to a power of an irreducible polynomial. Proof. In the principal ideal domain Z p [x], the non-trivial primary ideals are precisely the principal ideals generated by powers of irreducible elements. The canonical projection π induces a bijective correspondence between primary ideals of Z p [x] and primary ideals of Z p n[x] containing (p). Now an ideal of Z p n[x] that does not consist only of zero-divisors is primary if and only if its radical is a maximal ideal (since the only non-maximal prime ideal is (p) = Z(Z p n[x])). Let f Z p n[x]. Then, since every prime ideal of Z p n[x] contains (p), the radical of (f) is equal to the radical of (f) + (p) = π 1 (π((f))). For a non-zerodivisor f, therefore, (f) is primary if and only if (f) + (p) is primary, which is equivalent to π(f) being a primary element of Z p [x]. 7

8 3.6. Definition. We call a non-zerodivisor of Z p n[x] primary if its image under projection to Z p [x] is associated to a power of an irreducible polynomial. The simplest form of Hensel s Lemma shows that every monic f Z p n[x] is a product of primary polynomials. Furthermore, the monic primary factors of a monic polynomial in Z p n[x] are uniquely determined Remark. ([8], Thm. 13.8). Let f Z p n[x] monic, then there exist monic polynomials f 1,...,f r Z p n[x] such that f = f 1... f r and the residue class of f i in Z p [x] is a power of a monic irreducible polynomial g i Z p [x], with g 1,...,g r distinct. The polynomials f 1,...,f r Z p n[x] are (up to ordering) uniquely determined Proposition. Every non-zero polynomial f Z p n[x] is representable as f = p k uf 1...f r with 0 k < n, u a unit of Z p n[x], r 0, and f 1,...,f r Z p n[x] monic polynomials such that the residue class of f i in Z p [x] is a power of a monic irreducible polynomial g i Z p [x], and g 1,...,g r are distinct. Moreover, k N 0 is unique, u Z p n[x] is unique modulo p n k Z p n[x], and also the f i are unique (up to ordering) modulo p n k Z p n[x]. Proof. Follows from 3.2, 3.4 and 3.7. For the the monoid of non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x] this means: 3.9. Theorem. Let M be the multiplicative monoid of non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x], and U its group of units. Let M be the submonoid of M consisting of all monic polynomials. Then M U M. For every monic irreducible polynomial f Z p [x] let M f be the submonoid of M consisting of those monic polynomials g Z p n[x] whose image under projection to Z p [x] is a power of f. Then M M f f where f ranges through all monic irreducible polynomials of Z p [x]. Proof. Follows by specializing 3.8 to non-zerodivisors, which by 1.3 are exactly the elements of Z p n[x] not divisible by p. The example in the introduction shows that the monoid M x (corresponding to the irreducible polynomial x Z p [x]) has infinite elasticity (defined in 4.1 below). We will show this of each of the direct summands M f in Theorem

9 4. Non-uniqueness of factorization and infinite elasticity Irreducible elements are defined in an arbitrary monoid in the same way as we defined them for the multiplicative monoid of a ring in 2.1. Note that the monoid of non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x], and its submonoid the monoid of all monic polynomials in Z p n[x] are cancellative Definition. Let (M, ) be a cancellative monoid. (1) For k 2, let ρ k (M) be the supremum of all those m N for which there exists a product of k irreducibles that can also be expressed as a product of m irreducibles. (2) The elasticity of M is sup k 2 (ρ k (M)/k); in other words, the elasticity is the supremum of the values m/k such that there exists an element of M that can be expressed both as a product of k irreducibles and as a product of m irreducibles Lemma. Let f be a monic polynomial in Z[x] which represents an irreducible polynomial in Z p [x]. Let d = deg(f). Let n,k N with 0 < k < n, m N with gcd(m,kd) = 1, and c Z with p c. Then f(x) m + cp k represents an irreducible polynomial in Z p n[x]. Proof. Suppose otherwise. Then there exist g,h,r Z[x], with g,h monic, g irreducible in Z p n[x], such that f(x) m + cp k = g(x)h(x) + p n r(x) and 0<deg g <dm. In Z p [x], g is a power of f, by unique factorization. Therefore deg g = ds with 0 < s < m. Let α be a zero of g. Let R be the ring of algebraic integers in Q[α] and P a prime of R above p with ramification index e. Let v be the normalized valuation on Q[α] corresponding to P. Since f(α) m = p n r(α) cp k, we have v(f(α)) = ke/m. As m is relatively prime to k, m divides e. This holds for the ramification index e i of every prime P i of R above p. Let f i be the inertia degree of P i. Then m divides i e if i = [Q[α] : Q] = deg g = ds. As m is relatively prime to d, m divides s, a contradiction to 0 < s < m. 9

10 4.3. Theorem. Let n 2. Let f be a monic irreducible polynomial in Z p [x]. Let M f be the submonoid of the multiplicative monoid of Z p n[x] defined in Theorem 3.9. Then the elasticity of M f is infinite. Moreover, ρ 2 (M f ) =. Proof. In the proof, f will, by abuse of notation, denote a monic polynomial in Z[x] which under canonical projection to Z p [x] maps to the f in the theorem. Let q be a prime with q > max(n 1,deg f). By Lemma 4.2, f(x) q + p n 1 is irreducible in Z p n[x], and ( f(x) q + p n 1) 2 = f(x) q (f(x) q + 2p n 1 ) is an example of factorization of a polynomial in M f into either 2 irreducible factors - on the left - or more than q irreducible factors - on the right (actually, the number of irreducible factors on the right is q + 1 for p 2, by Lemma 4.2, and 2q for p = 2.) As q can be made arbitrarily large, ρ 2 (M f ) =, and the elasticity of M f is infinite Corollary. Let M be the multiplicative monoid of non-zerodivisors of Z p n[x] and M the submoinoid of monic polynomials. Then the elasticity of M is infinite, and ρ 2 (M ) =. Therefore the elasticity of M is infinite and also ρ 2 (M) =. Proof. Indeed, by Theorem 3.9 and Theorem 4.3, M is an infinite direct sum of monoids M f of infinite elasticity and satisfying ρ 2 (M f ) =. Acknowledgment. The authors wish to thank F. Halter-Koch for useful comments. References [1] A. G. Aḡargün, D. D. Anderson, and S. Valdes-Leon, Factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors. III., Rocky Mountain J. Math. 31 (2001), [2] D. D. Anderson and S. Valdes-Leon, Factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors., Rocky Mountain J. Math. 26 (1996), [3] D. D. Anderson and S. Valdes-Leon, Factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors. II., in Factorization in integral domains (Iowa City Conf. 10

11 1996), D. D. Anderson, ed., vol. 189 of Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., Marcel Dekker, 1997, [4] S. Frisch, Polynomial functions on finite commutative rings, in Advances in commutative ring theory (3rd Fez Conf. 1997), D. Dobbs et al., eds., vol. 205 of Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., Marcel Dekker, 1999, [5] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique factorizations. Algebraic, combinatorial and analytic theory, Chapman&Hall/CRC, [6] J. J. Jiang, G. H. Peng, Q. Sun, and Q. F. Zhang, On polynomial functions over finite commutative rings, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 22 (2006), [7] B. R. McDonald, Finite rings with identity, Marcel Dekker, [8] Z.-X. Wan, Lectures on finite fields and Galois rings, World Scientific, [9] Q. F. Zhang, Polynomial functions and permutation polynomials over some finite commutative rings, J. Number Th. 105 (2004), Institut für Mathematik A Technische Universität Graz Steyrergasse 30 A-8010 Graz, Austria Phone Fax Ch. F. S. F. 11

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize

Computer Algebra for Computer Engineers

p.1/14 Computer Algebra for Computer Engineers Preliminaries Priyank Kalla Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Utah, Salt Lake City p.2/14 Notation R: Real Numbers Q: Fractions

Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2)

Modern Algebra Lecture Notes: Rings and fields set 4 (Revision 2) Kevin Broughan University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand May 13, 2010 Remainder and Factor Theorem 15 Definition of factor If f (x)

MOP 2007 Black Group Integer Polynomials Yufei Zhao. Integer Polynomials. June 29, 2007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu

Integer Polynomials June 9, 007 Yufei Zhao yufeiz@mit.edu We will use Z[x] to denote the ring of polynomials with integer coefficients. We begin by summarizing some of the common approaches used in dealing

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Discrete valuation rings: Dimension 1 Noetherian regular local rings 1 Last day, we discussed the Zariski tangent space, and saw that it

7. Some irreducible polynomials

7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of

it is easy to see that α = a

21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UF. Therefore

ON UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS

ON UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS JIM COYKENDALL AND WILLIAM W. SMITH Abstract. In this paper we attempt to generalize the notion of unique factorization domain in the spirit of half-factorial domain. It

Introduction to Finite Fields (cont.)

Chapter 6 Introduction to Finite Fields (cont.) 6.1 Recall Theorem. Z m is a field m is a prime number. Theorem (Subfield Isomorphic to Z p ). Every finite field has the order of a power of a prime number

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS

POLYNOMIAL RINGS AND UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS RUSS WOODROOFE 1. Unique Factorization Domains Throughout the following, we think of R as sitting inside R[x] as the constant polynomials (of degree 0).

Unique Factorization

Unique Factorization Waffle Mathcamp 2010 Throughout these notes, all rings will be assumed to be commutative. 1 Factorization in domains: definitions and examples In this class, we will study the phenomenon

11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z

11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(

Algebraic Structures II

MAS 305 Algebraic Structures II Notes 12 Autumn 2006 Factorization in integral domains Lemma If a, b, c are elements of an integral domain R and ab = ac then either a = 0 R or b = c. Proof ab = ac a(b

H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems

H/wk 13, Solutions to selected problems Ch. 4.1, Problem 5 (a) Find the number of roots of x x in Z 4, Z Z, any integral domain, Z 6. (b) Find a commutative ring in which x x has infinitely many roots.

Factorization in Polynomial Rings

Factorization in Polynomial Rings These notes are a summary of some of the important points on divisibility in polynomial rings from 17 and 18 of Gallian s Contemporary Abstract Algebra. Most of the important

Appendix A. Appendix. A.1 Algebra. Fields and Rings

Appendix A Appendix A.1 Algebra Algebra is the foundation of algebraic geometry; here we collect some of the basic algebra on which we rely. We develop some algebraic background that is needed in the text.

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010 EYAL Z. GOREN (1) Let G be a group and H Z(G) a subgroup such that G/H is cyclic. Prove that G is abelian. Conclude that every group of order p 2 (p a prime

Introduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points

Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization

Quotient Rings and Field Extensions

Chapter 5 Quotient Rings and Field Extensions In this chapter we describe a method for producing field extension of a given field. If F is a field, then a field extension is a field K that contains F.

The van Hoeij Algorithm for Factoring Polynomials

The van Hoeij Algorithm for Factoring Polynomials Jürgen Klüners Abstract In this survey we report about a new algorithm for factoring polynomials due to Mark van Hoeij. The main idea is that the combinatorial

PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS

PROBLEM SET 6: POLYNOMIALS 1. introduction In this problem set we will consider polynomials with coefficients in K, where K is the real numbers R, the complex numbers C, the rational numbers Q or any other

3. Prime and maximal ideals. 3.1. Definitions and Examples.

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 5 3.1. Definitions and Examples. 3. Prime and maximal ideals Definition. An ideal P in a ring A is called prime if P A and if for every pair x, y of elements in A\P we have xy P. Equivalently,

Chapter 13: Basic ring theory

Chapter 3: Basic ring theory Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 42, Spring 24 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 3: Basic ring

Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013

Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997 2013 Contents A Cyclotomic Polynomials 79 A.1 Minimum Polynomials of Roots of

3 Factorisation into irreducibles

3 Factorisation into irreducibles Consider the factorisation of a non-zero, non-invertible integer n as a product of primes: n = p 1 p t. If you insist that primes should be positive then, since n could

Factorization Algorithms for Polynomials over Finite Fields

Degree Project Factorization Algorithms for Polynomials over Finite Fields Sajid Hanif, Muhammad Imran 2011-05-03 Subject: Mathematics Level: Master Course code: 4MA11E Abstract Integer factorization is

Factoring of Prime Ideals in Extensions

Chapter 4 Factoring of Prime Ideals in Extensions 4. Lifting of Prime Ideals Recall the basic AKLB setup: A is a Dedekind domain with fraction field K, L is a finite, separable extension of K of degree

(a) Write each of p and q as a polynomial in x with coefficients in Z[y, z]. deg(p) = 7 deg(q) = 9

Homework #01, due 1/20/10 = 9.1.2, 9.1.4, 9.1.6, 9.1.8, 9.2.3 Additional problems for study: 9.1.1, 9.1.3, 9.1.5, 9.1.13, 9.2.1, 9.2.2, 9.2.4, 9.2.5, 9.2.6, 9.3.2, 9.3.3 9.1.1 (This problem was not assigned

On the Infinitude of Prime Elements

Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas Volumen 47(2013)2, páginas 167-179 On the Infinitude of Prime Elements Acerca de la infinitud de elementos primos Luis F. Cáceres-Duque 1, José A. Vélez-Marulanda 2,a,

6. Fields I. 1. Adjoining things

6. Fields I 6.1 Adjoining things 6.2 Fields of fractions, fields of rational functions 6.3 Characteristics, finite fields 6.4 Algebraic field extensions 6.5 Algebraic closures 1. Adjoining things The general

ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OF POLYNOMIALS AND POWER SERIES OVER COMMUTATIVE RINGS

ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OF POLYNOMIALS AND POWER SERIES OVER COMMUTATIVE RINGS M. AXTELL, J. COYKENDALL, AND J. STICKLES Abstract. We recall several results of zero divisor graphs of commutative rings. We

The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 2012

The Division Algorithm for Polynomials Handout Monday March 5, 0 Let F be a field (such as R, Q, C, or F p for some prime p. This will allow us to divide by any nonzero scalar. (For some of the following,

QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY IN CHARACTERISTIC 2 KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction Let F be a finite field. When F has odd characteristic, the quadratic reciprocity law in F[T ] (see [4, Section 3.2.2] or [5]) lets

Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials

Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear

Irreducible Divisor Graphs

Irreducible Divisor Graphs Jim Coykendall Department of Mathematics North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105-5075 Jack Maney Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of South Dakota 414

Finite Fields and Error-Correcting Codes

Lecture Notes in Mathematics Finite Fields and Error-Correcting Codes Karl-Gustav Andersson (Lund University) (version 1.013-16 September 2015) Translated from Swedish by Sigmundur Gudmundsson Contents

FACTORING IN QUADRATIC FIELDS. 1. Introduction. This is called a quadratic field and it has degree 2 over Q. Similarly, set

FACTORING IN QUADRATIC FIELDS KEITH CONRAD For a squarefree integer d other than 1, let 1. Introduction K = Q[ d] = {x + y d : x, y Q}. This is called a quadratic field and it has degree 2 over Q. Similarly,

A number field is a field of finite degree over Q. By the Primitive Element Theorem, any number

Number Fields Introduction A number field is a field of finite degree over Q. By the Primitive Element Theorem, any number field K = Q(α) for some α K. The minimal polynomial Let K be a number field and

3 1. Note that all cubes solve it; therefore, there are no more

Math 13 Problem set 5 Artin 11.4.7 Factor the following polynomials into irreducible factors in Q[x]: (a) x 3 3x (b) x 3 3x + (c) x 9 6x 6 + 9x 3 3 Solution: The first two polynomials are cubics, so if

Irreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients

DOI: 10.2478/auom-2014-0007 An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 221),2014, 73 84 Irreducibility criteria for compositions and multiplicative convolutions of polynomials with integer coefficients Anca

some algebra prelim solutions

some algebra prelim solutions David Morawski August 19, 2012 Problem (Spring 2008, #5). Show that f(x) = x p x + a is irreducible over F p whenever a F p is not zero. Proof. First, note that f(x) has no

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for

Die ganzen zahlen hat Gott gemacht

Die ganzen zahlen hat Gott gemacht Polynomials with integer values B.Sury A quote attributed to the famous mathematician L.Kronecker is Die Ganzen Zahlen hat Gott gemacht, alles andere ist Menschenwerk.

CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.

Solutions A ring A is called a Boolean ring if x 2 = x for all x A.

1. A ring A is called a Boolean ring if x 2 = x for all x A. (a) Let E be a set and 2 E its power set. Show that a Boolean ring structure is defined on 2 E by setting AB = A B, and A + B = (A B c ) (B

U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra

U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory

ADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS WITH IDENTITY

ADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS WITH IDENTITY SIMION BREAZ AND GRIGORE CĂLUGĂREANU Abstract. A ring with identity exists on a torsion Abelian group exactly when the group is bounded. The additive groups of torsion-free

Intro to Rings, Fields, Polynomials: Hardware Modeling by Modulo Arithmetic

Intro to Rings, Fields, Polynomials: Hardware Modeling by Modulo Arithmetic Priyank Kalla Associate Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah kalla@ece.utah.edu http://www.ece.utah.edu/~kalla

2. Let H and K be subgroups of a group G. Show that H K G if and only if H K or K H.

Math 307 Abstract Algebra Sample final examination questions with solutions 1. Suppose that H is a proper subgroup of Z under addition and H contains 18, 30 and 40, Determine H. Solution. Since gcd(18,

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include 2 + 5.

PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: November 17, 2015) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include

Cyclotomic Extensions

Chapter 7 Cyclotomic Extensions A cyclotomic extension Q(ζ n ) of the rationals is formed by adjoining a primitive n th root of unity ζ n. In this chapter, we will find an integral basis and calculate

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples

Winter Camp 2011 Polynomials Alexander Remorov. Polynomials. Alexander Remorov alexanderrem@gmail.com

Polynomials Alexander Remorov alexanderrem@gmail.com Warm-up Problem 1: Let f(x) be a quadratic polynomial. Prove that there exist quadratic polynomials g(x) and h(x) such that f(x)f(x + 1) = g(h(x)).

Factoring Polynomials

Factoring Polynomials Sue Geller June 19, 2006 Factoring polynomials over the rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers has long been a standard topic of high school algebra. With the advent

FACTORIZATION IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS

FACTORIZATION IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS PETE L. CLARK Contents Introduction 2 1. Norm functions 3 1.1. Weak multiplicative norms and multiplicative norms 3 1.2. Abstract number rings 3 1.3. Dirichlet rings 5

EMBEDDING DEGREE OF HYPERELLIPTIC CURVES WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION

EMBEDDING DEGREE OF HYPERELLIPTIC CURVES WITH COMPLEX MULTIPLICATION CHRISTIAN ROBENHAGEN RAVNSHØJ Abstract. Consider the Jacobian of a genus two curve defined over a finite field and with complex multiplication.

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS SVANTE JANSON Abstract. This is a collection of classical results about resultants and discriminants for polynomials, compiled mainly for my own use. All results

The Chebotarev Density Theorem

The Chebotarev Density Theorem Hendrik Lenstra 1. Introduction Consider the polynomial f(x) = X 4 X 2 1 Z[X]. Suppose that we want to show that this polynomial is irreducible. We reduce f modulo a prime

Commutative Algebra Notes Introduction to Commutative Algebra Atiyah & Macdonald

Commutative Algebra Notes Introduction to Commutative Algebra Atiyah & Macdonald Adam Boocher 1 Rings and Ideals 1.1 Rings and Ring Homomorphisms A commutative ring A with identity is a set with two binary

1 Homework 1. [p 0 q i+j +... + p i 1 q j+1 ] + [p i q j ] + [p i+1 q j 1 +... + p i+j q 0 ]

1 Homework 1 (1) Prove the ideal (3,x) is a maximal ideal in Z[x]. SOLUTION: Suppose we expand this ideal by including another generator polynomial, P / (3, x). Write P = n + x Q with n an integer not

SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS. 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by

SUBGROUPS OF CYCLIC GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction In a group G, we denote the (cyclic) group of powers of some g G by g = {g k : k Z}. If G = g, then G itself is cyclic, with g as a generator. Examples

Field Fundamentals. Chapter 3. 3.1 Field Extensions. 3.1.1 Definitions. 3.1.2 Lemma

Chapter 3 Field Fundamentals 3.1 Field Extensions If F is a field and F [X] is the set of all polynomials over F, that is, polynomials with coefficients in F, we know that F [X] is a Euclidean domain,

Math 345-60 Abstract Algebra I Questions for Section 23: Factoring Polynomials over a Field

Math 345-60 Abstract Algebra I Questions for Section 23: Factoring Polynomials over a Field 1. Throughout this section, F is a field and F [x] is the ring of polynomials with coefficients in F. We will

4. CLASSES OF RINGS 4.1. Classes of Rings class operator A-closed Example 1: product Example 2:

4. CLASSES OF RINGS 4.1. Classes of Rings Normally we associate, with any property, a set of objects that satisfy that property. But problems can arise when we allow sets to be elements of larger sets

r + s = i + j (q + t)n; 2 rs = ij (qj + ti)n + qtn.

Chapter 7 Introduction to finite fields This chapter provides an introduction to several kinds of abstract algebraic structures, particularly groups, fields, and polynomials. Our primary interest is in

5.1 Commutative rings; Integral Domains

5.1 J.A.Beachy 1 5.1 Commutative rings; Integral Domains from A Study Guide for Beginner s by J.A.Beachy, a supplement to Abstract Algebra by Beachy / Blair 23. Let R be a commutative ring. Prove the following

(x + a) n = x n + a Z n [x]. Proof. If n is prime then the map

22. A quick primality test Prime numbers are one of the most basic objects in mathematics and one of the most basic questions is to decide which numbers are prime (a clearly related problem is to find

minimal polyonomial Example

Minimal Polynomials Definition Let α be an element in GF(p e ). We call the monic polynomial of smallest degree which has coefficients in GF(p) and α as a root, the minimal polyonomial of α. Example: We

fg = f g. 3.1.1. Ideals. An ideal of R is a nonempty k-subspace I R closed under multiplication by elements of R:

30 3. RINGS, IDEALS, AND GRÖBNER BASES 3.1. Polynomial rings and ideals The main object of study in this section is a polynomial ring in a finite number of variables R = k[x 1,..., x n ], where k is an

Math 319 Problem Set #3 Solution 21 February 2002

Math 319 Problem Set #3 Solution 21 February 2002 1. ( 2.1, problem 15) Find integers a 1, a 2, a 3, a 4, a 5 such that every integer x satisfies at least one of the congruences x a 1 (mod 2), x a 2 (mod

Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms

Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008) Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms David Eisenbud & Bernd Ulrich Affectionately dedicated to Mel Hochster, who has been an inspiration to us for many years, on the occasion

GROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV

GROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV We will associate a certain algebra to a finite group and prove that it is semisimple. Then we will apply Wedderburn s theory to its study. Definition 0.1. Let G be a finite

ON HENSEL S ROOTS AND A FACTORIZATION FORMULA IN Z[[X]]

#A47 INTEGERS 4 (204) ON HENSEL S ROOTS AND A FACTORIZATION FORMULA IN Z[[X]] Daniel Birmaer Department of Mathematics, Nazareth College, Rochester, New Yor abirma6@naz.edu Juan B. Gil Penn State Altoona,

Galois Theory III. 3.1. Splitting fields.

Galois Theory III. 3.1. Splitting fields. We know how to construct a field extension L of a given field K where a given irreducible polynomial P (X) K[X] has a root. We need a field extension of K where

Primality - Factorization

Primality - Factorization Christophe Ritzenthaler November 9, 2009 1 Prime and factorization Definition 1.1. An integer p > 1 is called a prime number (nombre premier) if it has only 1 and p as divisors.

The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm

Subsets of Euclidean domains possessing a unique division algorithm Andrew D. Lewis 2009/03/16 Abstract Subsets of a Euclidean domain are characterised with the following objectives: (1) ensuring uniqueness

Introduction to finite fields

Introduction to finite fields Topics in Finite Fields (Fall 2013) Rutgers University Swastik Kopparty Last modified: Monday 16 th September, 2013 Welcome to the course on finite fields! This is aimed at

On the number-theoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n)

ACTA ARITHMETICA LXXVIII.1 (1996) On the number-theoretic functions ν(n) and Ω(n) by Jiahai Kan (Nanjing) 1. Introduction. Let d(n) denote the divisor function, ν(n) the number of distinct prime factors,

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. Valuation rings (and non-singular points of curves) 1 1.1. Completions 2 1.2. A big result from commutative algebra 3 Problem sets back.

ON GENERALIZED RELATIVE COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF A FINITE GROUP. A. K. Das and R. K. Nath

International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 7 (2010) 140-151 ON GENERALIZED RELATIVE COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF A FINITE GROUP A. K. Das and R. K. Nath Received: 12 October 2009; Revised: 15 December

3. Equivalence Relations. Discussion

3. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS 33 3. Equivalence Relations 3.1. Definition of an Equivalence Relations. Definition 3.1.1. A relation R on a set A is an equivalence relation if and only if R is reflexive, symmetric,

RINGS OF ZERO-DIVISORS

RINGS OF ZERO-DIVISORS P. M. COHN 1. Introduction. A well known theorem of algebra states that any integral domain can be embedded in a field. More generally [2, p. 39 ff. ], any commutative ring R with

The cyclotomic polynomials

The cyclotomic polynomials Notes by G.J.O. Jameson 1. The definition and general results We use the notation e(t) = e 2πit. Note that e(n) = 1 for integers n, e(s + t) = e(s)e(t) for all s, t. e( 1 ) =

inv lve a journal of mathematics Zero-divisor ideals and realizable zero-divisor graphs Michael Axtell, Joe Stickles and Wallace Trampbachls

inv lve a journal of mathematics Zero-divisor ideals and realizable zero-divisor graphs Michael Axtell, Joe Stickles and Wallace Trampbachls mathematical sciences publishers 2009 Vol. 2, No. 1 INVOLVE

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA. Romyar Sharifi

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA Romyar Sharifi Contents Introduction 7 Part 1. A First Course 11 Chapter 1. Set theory 13 1.1. Sets and functions 13 1.2. Relations 15 1.3. Binary operations 19 Chapter 2. Group theory

Primitive Prime Divisors of First-Order Polynomial Recurrence Sequences

Primitive Prime Divisors of First-Order Polynomial Recurrence Sequences Brian Rice brice@hmc.edu July 19, 2006 Abstract The question of which terms of a recurrence sequence fail to have primitive prime

Lecture 6: Finite Fields (PART 3) PART 3: Polynomial Arithmetic. Theoretical Underpinnings of Modern Cryptography

Lecture 6: Finite Fields (PART 3) PART 3: Polynomial Arithmetic Theoretical Underpinnings of Modern Cryptography Lecture Notes on Computer and Network Security by Avi Kak (kak@purdue.edu) January 29, 2015

Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned

CONSTRUCTION OF THE FINITE FIELDS Z p S. R. DOTY Elementary Number Theory We begin with a bit of elementary number theory, which is concerned solely with questions about the set of integers Z = {0, ±1,

2 Polynomials over a field

2 Polynomials over a field A polynomial over a field F is a sequence (a 0, a 1, a 2,, a n, ) where a i F i with a i = 0 from some point on a i is called the i th coefficient of f We define three special

Congruence properties of binary partition functions

Congruence properties of binary partition functions Katherine Anders, Melissa Dennison, Jennifer Weber Lansing and Bruce Reznick Abstract. Let A be a finite subset of N containing 0, and let f(n) denote

calculating the result modulo 3, as follows: p(0) = 0 3 + 0 + 1 = 1 0,

Homework #02, due 1/27/10 = 9.4.1, 9.4.2, 9.4.5, 9.4.6, 9.4.7. Additional problems recommended for study: (9.4.3), 9.4.4, 9.4.9, 9.4.11, 9.4.13, (9.4.14), 9.4.17 9.4.1 Determine whether the following polynomials

26 Ideals and Quotient Rings

Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan 26 Ideals and Quotient Rings In this section we develop some theory of rings that parallels the theory of groups discussed

COMMUTATIVE RINGS. Definition: A domain is a commutative ring R that satisfies the cancellation law for multiplication:

COMMUTATIVE RINGS Definition: A commutative ring R is a set with two operations, addition and multiplication, such that: (i) R is an abelian group under addition; (ii) ab = ba for all a, b R (commutative

On the representability of the bi-uniform matroid

On the representability of the bi-uniform matroid Simeon Ball, Carles Padró, Zsuzsa Weiner and Chaoping Xing August 3, 2012 Abstract Every bi-uniform matroid is representable over all sufficiently large