OPERS. The geometric Langlands correspondence conjectures a correspondence


 Derek Phelps
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 OPERS JONATHAN BARLEV The geometric Langlands correspondence conjectures a correspondence QcolocsysL Gx)) = DmodBun G )) on the level of derived categories. As remarked previously in theseminar,toeach local system over we associate the skyscraper sheaf over it. In this talk we shall discuss a subspace 1 of locsysl G ) for whom the RHS counterpart of the corresponding skyscraper sheaves) is known and consists of Hecke eigensheaves. 1. Definitions Let G be a connected reductive group over C, agoper will be defined shortly as a G localsystemon with extra structure. ix a Borel subgroup B G. This choice induces a descending filtration on g of length twice the rank + 1 for which g r = g and g i+1 =[g i, n] so g 0 = b, g 1 = n etc.), which is preserved by b. We also denote H = B/N, whichactsongrg via ad. Let B be B torsor on, and let G, ) be a local system on the induced G torsor. Let E G = T G /G, thisisthevectorbundleover whose sections are Ginvariant vector fields on 2 G ;thinkoftheconnectionasamap : T E G which is asectiontotheprojectione G T). Composing T E G E G /E B = g/b) we obtain a section c ) Γ, g/b) Ω ),whichmeasurestowhich extent B is preserved by the connection; preserves B if and only if c ) =0. We start by defining opers for groups of adjoint type, let g be a semisimple Lie Algebra, let G denote it s adjoint group. Definition 1.1. A goper on is a pair B, ) where B is a B torsor over, and is a Gconnection on the induced Gtorsor, G := B B G,suchthat: 1) c ) actually lands in Γ, g 1 /b) ). Date: March8, At least morally, in our definitions it won t allways be a subspace. 2 I.e. the Lie algebroid of infinitesimal symmetries of G.Itavectorbundleover equipped with aliebracketsatisfyinganappropriateleibnitzrule. It sfiber is noncanonically g T x. 1
2 2 JONATHAN BARLEV 2) or each simple negative root α, the composition is an isomorphism. c ) α : T c ) g 1 /b) g 1 /b) α Often we shall think of a Goper as a Glocal system G, ) with the extra data of aspecifiedreductionofthestructureofthetorsortob 3 satisfying the connection conditions above. Example 1.2. If is a curve with a coordinate dx, andg = PGL n with usual upper triangular Borel) we can give an oper structure to the trivial torsor B 0 by using a connection of the form = d + dx 1 0 where d is the flat 1 0 connection on the trivialized torsor G). In fact any choice of matrix with non vanishing subdiagonal will do, however we shall show that locally every oper is isomorphic to a unique oper with this form which of course depends on the choice of coordinate, dx). Remark 1.3. If B, ) is a Goper then for any η Γ, b Ω ) we can form anewoper + η. When G is of nonadjoint type we give a definition which differs from that in [1]. In their definition a Goper for an arbitrary reductive, connected G) haszg) as it s automorphism group, the effect of our change is to eliminate these as well as restrict the admissible opers. When G is of adjoint type the oper conditions imply induces an isomorphism H H g 1 /g 2 φ Ω r = Ω ˇρ H H g 1 /g 2 here Ω is identified with the underlying G m torsor, and ˇρ is the cocharacter associated sum of the fundamental coweights which is a character since G is of adjoint type). In the adjoint case there exists a unique isomorphism H φ can H := Ω ˇρ H inducing φ. WhenG is not necessarily of adjoint type ˇρ might not be a cocharacter, but 2ˇρ is and if we fix a square root of the canonical bundle Ω 1/2 then would still induce H H g 1 /g 2 φ Ω r = Ω 1/2 ˇ2ρ H H g 1 /g 2 3 recall every Gbundle on a smooth curve admits a reduction to B.
3 OPERS 3 Definition 1.4. ix a square root of the canonical bundle, Ω 1/2. or G not necessarily adjoint, in addition to the contents of definition 1.1, we require the data of an isomorphism H φ Ω 1/2 ˇ 2ρ H which is compatible with φ as above. We call φ the marking. As mentioned above, for G of adjoint type such a φ exists and is unique. general the data of 1.1 does not imply the existence of φ, hencerelativeto[1]we are indeed limiting our collection of opers. Moreover, φ determines φ only up to an automorphism of the underlying torsor given by multiplication with a central element; fixing φ eliminates these automorphisms. Example 1.5. In the case of Gl n or SL n,anoperanbedescribedintermsofa rank n vector bundle as follows: it consists of the data E, E i ),,φ) where E is a rank n vector bundle over, E i ) n i=1 is a complete flag for E, φ : E = 1 Ω n 1)/2 is an isomorphism, and finally : E E Ω is connection which satisfies. 1) E i ) E i+1 Ω,thusinducesmorphismsbetweentheinvertiblesheaves gr i E gr i+1 E Ω. 2) or each i the morphism above is an isomorphism. 2. Opers as a functor Next we proceed to collect opers into a functor on D schemes. Indeed if Y In f is a D scheme, then the notion of a Gtorsor over Y with connection along makes sense: it is a Gtorsor G p Y for which G is compatibly a Gequivariant D  scheme, i.e. the map p is horizontal. or a Goper on Y along we additionally provide the data of a reduction of the torsor structure to the Borel, as well as an φ isomorphism H f Ω 1/2 2ˇρ H which satisfy: 1) c ), whichisthecomposition : f T E G g/b),actuallylands in g 1 /b) note these are all vector bundles over Y ). 2) or each negative simple root α, thecompositionf T g 1 /b) g 1 /b) α is an isomorphism. Thus we have an induced map g1 /g 2 ) f Ω ) r. 3) The map induced by φ, g 1 /g 2 ) = H H g 1 /g 2 φ f Ω 1/2 agrees with the map induced by above. 2ˇρ H H g 1 /g 2 =f Ω ) r or any two such objects the notion of an isomorphism is evident and we can form the groupoid Op G Y ), whoseobjectsaregopers over Y. Lastly, pullback
4 4 JONATHAN BARLEV of such opers along horizontal maps is defined and has the same underlyingglocal system as the pullback in that category) and we end up with a functor on D schemes, Op G,whichisasheafatleastintheZariskitopology. In particular, we may endow Y = S with the flat connection and obtain the notion of an S family of opers on. Abusing notation we use Op G ) to denote the functor on schemes whose Spoints are OpS ); thusop G ) is a functor over schemes. In the next secion we shall show that Op g is representable by a D scheme which is noncanonically) isomorphic to the Hitchin jet bundle J ets cl g Gm Ω ). It s horizontal sections, Op g ) will thus be represented by HitchL g), hence naturally be an affine space whenever is complete. or now we show that Op G is fibered over D schemes in sets, i.e. opers have no automorphisms. Proposition 2.1. A Goper, B,,φ), overad scheme Y has no non trivial) automorphisms. Proof. This is a local question so we may assume that B = Y B is trivialized, and has a local coordinate dx. We can write = d + η dx, whered is the flat connection on Y B induced by the connection on Y and the trivialization, and η : Y g 1 has nonvanishing entries for each simple negative root. Considering the underlying torsor B = Y B as a right torsor, an automorphism consists of left translation by a map σ : Y B. Since σ must preserve φ it must act trivially on H,thisforcestheimageofσ to actually fall in N, soσ : Y N. Conversely any such automorphism will be trivial mod N, havenoeffecton H and will preserve φ. Theeffectofsuchamapontheconnectionis σ.d + η) =d + dσ l σ 1 + Adσ)η dx Assume σ induces an automorphism of the oper, i.e. preserves the connection. Note that dσ l σ 1 Γ, g 1 Ω ) recall n = g 1 )so Adσ)η η modg 1 In N we can take logarithms so let σ =logn for some n n, letg i be the smallest term of the filtration containing n, we show i = r and hence σ = 1. dσ l σ 1 = d log σ = dn Γ, g i Ω )=Γ, g 1 Ω ) so that Adσ)η η modg i. Indeed
5 OPERS 5 Choose a Cartan subalgebra h b, andwriteη = η 1 + β with η 1 : Y g 1 having non vanishing coordinates in each simple negative root space, and β : Y b. g i Adσ)η 1 + β) η 1 + β) = = Adexpn))η 1 + β) η 1 + β) = [n, η 1 + β]+1/2[n, [n, η 1 + β]] + [n, η 1 ]+g i hence [η 1,n] g i. We show this implies n g i+1 which is a contradiction to the choice of i unless n =0 implying σ =1). Let {e 0,h 0,f 0 } the standard basis of sl 2,letb 0 = span{e 0,h 0 } denote the standard Borel. At every point of Y the map η 1 determines a principal embedding 4 sl 2 g,whichcarriesb 0 to b and for which η 1 is a scalar multiple of the image of f 0.Consideringg as an sl 2 representation via this principle embedding, our filtration corresponds to the weight space filtration and for a positive weight i, hence ad f0 : g i /g i+1 g i 1 /g i. Opers were introduced as living within local systems, this is truetothefollowing extent. The forgetful functor from Op G ) locsys G ) is always faithful. However, under our definition an oper cannot have nontrivial automorphismwhile the underlying local system might the issue is that a local system isomorphism may not preserve the flag or the marking). Nonetheless less we do have the following. Proposition 2.2. Let be a complete curve of genus g 2, G semisimple of adjoint type, and G, ) a Glocal system on which admits an oper structure. Then the oper structure is unique. We use the Harder Narasimhan flag: Lemma 2.3. Let G be a be torsor over a complete curve of genus g 2. Let B be a reduction to the Borel such that for each simple positive root α, the G m torsor H α G m has positive degree for. Then B is unique. proof of 2.2. Let B be a reduction to the Borel which makes G, ) an oper, we show that B is the Harder Narasimhan flag, hence is unique. Indeed for every positive simple root H α G m = Ω ;since g 2, ithaspositivedegree. 4 Aprincipalembeddingisoneinwhiche0,f 0 map to principal nilpotents in g; suchanembedding determines a Cartan subalgebra relative to which e 0 and f 0 map to sums of basis elements of the positive/negative root spaces respectively.
6 6 JONATHAN BARLEV Corollary 2.4. When is a complete curve and g 2 and g is semisimple then Op g ) is a full and faithful subcategory of locsys G ) where G is the adjoint group of g). In the nonadjoint case the ambiguity in the oper structure on G, ) is only due to the choice of marking i.e. the flag is uniquely determined). It follows the the fiber of Op G ) locsys G ) is a naturally torsor for the automorphisms of φ over see1.4);evidentlythisisz =the center of G. 3. A description of the space of gopers We now restrict ourselves to the adjoint case of gopers with g semisimple, and show that Op g is a torsor for the jet scheme of) a certain vector bundle over. Passing to global sections we obtain an isomorphism of Op g ) with an affine space which we shall identify with HitchL g). Recall that in Andrei s talk Dalgebras were heuristically introduced as being to nonlinear PDE s what Dmod s are to linear PDE s. That opers are a torsor for a vector bundle corresponds to the fact that solutions to a nonlinear PDE are a torsor for the solutions of it s homogeneous counterpart. It turns out that for any g this torsor structure may be obtained from the torsor structure of Op sl2,andwestartbyconsideringthiscase sl 2 opers. Lemma 3.1. Op sl2 is naturally a torsor for 5 Ω 2. Proof. Let B,,φ) be any oper on a D scheme Y f. Westartbynotingin our case n = g 1 /g 2 so the that by induces n = f Ω,thusn f Ω = f Ω 2 and Ω 2 both apriori act on Op sl 2 Y ) and Op sl2 respectively) by modifying the connection. To prove the action is simply transitive we may work locally. Replacing and Y by appropriate Zariski opens we may assume that has a local coordinate dx, and B = Y B is trivial since B is solvable B,isZariskilocallytrivial).Asinthe proof of lemma 2.1, a choice of coordinate and trivialization gives = d + dx η 5 There is some abuse of notation going on here, we are actually considering Ω 2 as a functor on D schemes rather than schemes). We could say instead that Op sl2 is a torsor for J ets Ω 2 ),sincethisisthed scheme representing the functor.
7 OPERS 7 where d is the flat connection w.r.t the trivialization and η : Y sl 2 does not vanish mod b. Recall that a change of the trivialization given by left multiplication by σ : Y B has the effect of modifying the connection to d + dσσ 1 + Adσ)η Computing directly this is where PSL 2 being of adjoint type comes in) we see that every coordinate determines a unique canonical trivialization which brings the connection to canonical form both relative to the choice of coordinate) ) 0 α = d + dx 1 0 thus the action of f Ω n Y ) on Op sl2 Y ) is free and transitive. Note also the the uniqueness implies that the underlying B torsor of any oper is trivialized whenever we have a coordinate. Corollary 3.2. All sl 2  torsors all have isomorphic underlying Btorsors. Denote this torsor 0 B 0. Remark 3.3. or a complete curve sl 2 opers always exist, hence Op sl2 is a trivial torsor for Ω 2 : When g 2, thisisimpliedbythefactthath 1, Ω 2 )=0. When g =1 there is a global coordinate ) and the trivialized torsor B with 0 α = d + dx is an oper. 1 0 When g =0 one can either compute directly and see there is a unique oper uniqueness is implied by the fact that H 0 P 1, Ω 2 P )=0). Alternatively, note 1 that an oper is equivalent to the data of a P 1 bundle with connection and a section with nonvanishing covariant derivative; take P 1 P 1 with the trivial connection and diagonal section gopers. Let g be an arbitrary semisimple lie algebra, with a chosen Borel b. Construction 3.4. Let {e 0,h 0,f 0 } the standard basis of sl 2,letb 0 = sp{e 0,h 0 } denote the standard Borel, and choose a principal embedding sl 2 g,whichcarries ι b 0 to b. To the map of Lie algebras corresponds a map of groups PSL G 2 G, where G is the adjoint group of g. We now describe how ι G may be used to construct a gopers out of an sl 2 opers. Let 0 B 0, 0 ) be an sl 2 oper on Y f 6.Let B, G respectively be the B, G torsors which 0 B 0 induces via ι G. The connection 0 naturally induces a connection on 6 Recall that for a goper the isomorphism φ is uniquely determined by the rest of the data, hence we ignore it.
8 8 JONATHAN BARLEV G which satisfies the oper condition because the map ι G is principal. In fact, if locally in an appropriate trivialization then 0 = d + dx In particular global gopers always exist. 0 α 1 0 = d + dx f + αe)) We wish to present gopers as a torsor for an appropriate vector bundle. Relative to a principal embedding, let g e0 7 be the stabilizer of e 0 in g. Asinthesl 2 case, on a curve with coordinate dx, lemma3.6willstatethateverygoper has acanonicaltrivializationandthat,locally,opersareatorsor for maps Y g e0. However, B doesn t act on g e0 so we can t apriori twist by B as in the sl 2 case) to immediately get an action on the space of opers. ) None the less, since B 0 does act on g e0 we can form g e0 := 0 0 H 0 H0 g e0 = 0 B 0 B0 g e0 Using Ω 2 =Ω n 0 0 Ω g e0 we construct an Ω 0 g e0 torsor 0 Op sl2 Ω 2 ) Ω g e0 0 Lemma 3.5. Every principal embedding gives rise to an isomorphism ) 3.1) Op sl2 Ω 2 Ω g e0 O p 0 g Proof. The map is defined by sending 0 B 0, ; ν ) to ι 0 B 0,ι + ν ).Where 0 B 0, ) is an sl 2 oper which induces a goper ι 0 B 0,ι ),andforν Ω g e0 we define 0 ι + ν using g e0 = 0 0 B 0 B0 g e0 0 B 0 B0 b = b 0. The image consists of opers whose underlying Btorsor is 0 B := 0 B 0 ι B. To see this is an isomorphism is suffices to check locally, whence this is implied by lemma 3.6. Lemma 3.6. Let be a curve with a coordinate dx. ix a principle embedding sl 2 g as above. or any goper on, the underlying Btorsor admits a unique trivialization relative to which the connection has the form where η : Y g e0. = d + dx f + η) 7 n0 g e 0 n. Inthecaseofsl n with the standard Principal embedding, g e consists of all strictly upper triangular matrices with constant superdiagonals.
9 OPERS 9 Proof. The proof uses Kostant s lemma see [2]) and we defer it to the appendix. Corollary 3.7. Global gopers exist and all gopers have isomorphic underlying Btorsors. Given a Principal embedding ι, this Btorsor is naturally identified with as the pushforward 0 B := 0 B 0 ι B. Every principal embedding gives rise, via lemma 3.5, to a Ω g e0 torsor structure on Op g. However, any two principal embedding are uniquely conjugate by an element of B. Thus,neitherthevectorspaceg e0,northetorsorstructuredepend on the Principal embedding: Lemma 3.8. Op g is naturally a torsor for Ω g e0.thusop g ) is naturally a torsor for Γ ), Ω g e0. Both are trivial torsors. As for the representability of the space of opers, any choice of a global oper on gives rise to: Corollary 3.9. Op g is representable by a D scheme isomorphic to J ets Ω g e0 ). When is complete, Op g ) is representable by a scheme isomorphic to Γ, Ω g e0 ) for which it is naturally an affine space). 4. Opers and the classical Hitchin space Next we discuss the relation to the Hitchin space, which will be further developed in the next section. Identify, via the Ad action, H 0 = Autn0 = G m to obtain a G m action on g e0 which we also denote Ad. H0 = Ω and so Ω g e0 =Ω H0 H0 g e0 )=Ω tadt) g e0 where tadt) denotes the action of t G m on g e0.therearenaturalisomorphisms cl g := specsym L g) LG = specsym L h) W = specsymh ) W = g//g and these identifications are G m equivariant w.r.t. the the action on the quotients, which is pushed forward from scalar multiplication on g and L g respectively. Recall Kostant s section of the Chevalley map g g//g has f 0 + g e0 as it s image. This section induces an isomorphism of varieties cl g g e0 which intertwines the G m action on cl g with the tadt) action on g e0. inally we obtain an identification schemes over 4.1) c Ω L g =Ω Gm cl g = Ω g e0 The LHS, which is not apriori a vector bundle, is now considered as such via this isomorphism.
10 10 JONATHAN BARLEV The punch line is that corollary 3.9 now reads: every global goper over gives rise to an isomorphism of D schemes Op g = J ets c Ω L g )=HitchL g = spec z cl ) L g Passing to functors of horizontal sections we get 4.2) Op g ) ) = Sect c Ω L = g HitchL g) Next assume is complete, then Op g ) is representable by a scheme, which is naturally an affine space for Γ, Ω g e0 ). Let A g denote the coordinate algebra of Op g,andleta g ) denote the coordinate algebra of Op g ). Recallthatz cl L g and zcl L g ) are the coordinate rings of HitchL g and HitchL g ) respectively, and that they are naturally graded. By the discussion above A g and z cl L g are noncanonically isomorphic as are A g ) and z cl L g )), but the following is canonical: Proposition 4.1. There exists a canonical filtration of A g and a canonical isomorphism of graded rings gra σ A g z cl L g. Proof. Identify z cl L g with the coordinate ring of J ets ) Ω tadt via 4.1. Note ge0 that the natural grading on z cl L g corresponds to the action of G m on Ω tadt ge0 opposite to tadt. As Op g is naturally an affine space for J ets Ω tadt ge0 ) over, onthelevel of coordinate rings, the grading on the latter induces a filtration on the former which yields the desired isomorphism. Corollary 4.2. Let be a complete curve. There exists a canonical filtration of A g ) and a canonical isomorphism of graded rings gra g )) gr A g )) σ A) z cl L g ). 5. The eiginrenkel isomorphism This section is the quantization of the previous, and relates operstothequantum Hitchin space. Let be a complete curve. Recall that z L g defined rather abstractly) was a filtered algebra and we had the following theorem of eigin and renkel, dicussed in Dustin s talk) and accompanying results which related the various Hitchin algeras. is an isomor Theorem 5.1 first eiginrenkel). The natural map grz g phism of graded D algebras. σ z z cl g Proposition 5.2. The natural surjection grz g ) ) gr zg ) ) is an isomorphism.
11 OPERS 11 Corollary 5.3. We have the following isomorphisms grzg ) ) gr zg ) ) σ z) z cl g ) As promised, the following theorem due to eigin and renkel as well relates the Hitchin spaces to opers: Theorem 5.4 second eiginrenkel). There exists an isomorphism of filtered algebras A g φ zl g which quantizes the map σ Ag of proposition 4.1, i.e. σ z grφ = σ Ag. Corollary 5.5. φ induces an isomorphism of filtered algebras A g ) φ z L g ) which quantizes the map σ Ag) of corollary 4.2, i.e. σ z) grφ = σ Ag). rom the perspective of spaces we have an isomorphisms ) spec zg OpL g and spec z g ) ) OpL g ) of D schemes and schemes respectively) providing a moduli description of the quantum Hitchin space. Let us summarize this Hitchin quantization business so far: AL g) gr gral g) = z g ) gr grz g )) ΓBun γ g, D ) gr grγbun γ g, D ) = = A cl L g ) = z cl g ) Where A cl ) is the coordinate ring of Γ = = ΓT Bun γ g, O), Ω g e0 0 ) and is introduced for the sake of symmetry. The marked isomorphisms are the ones we proved, they imply the rest of the maps are isomorphisms as well. inally the geometric Langlands correspondence for opers should play out as follows: starting from a L glocal system on, σ, whichadmitsaunique)operstructure we get a maximal ideal m σ AL g ) whose residue field we denote k σ.thuswe get a twisted Dmod D σ := D ALg ) k σ on Bun g ).This will be shown to be a Hecke Eigensheaf.
12 12 JONATHAN BARLEV 6. Appendix  Kostant s lemma and it s application In this appendix we state a lemma of Kostant and prove lemma 3.6. This has already been discussed in the seminar to some extent, see [2]. Choose a principal ι embedding sl 2 g, andlete, h, f denote the images of the standard) same named elements in sl 2. e and f are contained in unique, opposite Borels; so ι determines a ι Borel, Cartan and root system. Let PSL G 2 G be the induced map on the group level. Lemma 6.1. N acts on f + b freely via Ad. f + g e is a section for this action, and moreover N i.f + g e )=f + g e + n i. With this in hand we prove lemma 3.6 : proof of lemma 3.6. Let have a coordinate dx, and let = d + η 1 dx η 1 : g 1 be the connection of a goper on a trivialized Btorsor. 1) We must show there exist a unique change of trivialization, σ : B such that the transformed connection d + dσσ 1 + Ad σ) η 1 dx has the desired form. Because G is of adjoint type Ad induces an isomorphism H GL g α ). Since η : g 1 has nonvanishing entries in every simple negative root space, there exists a unique σh H s.t. that Ad σ) η = f mod b. σ 1 H dσ 1 H b so that after changing the trivialization using σ H it has the form d +f + η 0 ) dx η 0 : b Let σ 1 : N be the unique map, promised by Konstant s lemma, such that Ad σ) f + η 0) f + g e.ifitweren tfortheσ 1 dσ term, which pops up when the trivialization is changed we d be done. Nonetheless we get an approximation mod n, i.e. afterchangingthetrivializationagainusingσ 1 the connection has the forms d +f + η 1 ) dx η 1 : n Note that σ 1 σ H with this property is unique mod N 2. We proceed in the same fashion inductively, noting at the i th stage that if f +η i f +g e +n i, then the unique σ i such that Adσ i )f + η i ) f + g e in fact lies in N i+1,henceσ 1 i dσ n i+1. After rankg steps we get σ r σ 1 σ H which is the required map.
13 OPERS 13 References [1] Beilinson; Drinfeld. Hitchin s integrable system. http : // gaitsgde/grad [2] Dennis Gaitsgory. Seminar notes:higgs gundles, kostant section, and local triviality of g bundles. http : // gaitsgde/grad 2009.
SEMINAR NOTES: GBUNDLES, STACKS AND BG (SEPT. 15, 2009)
SEMINAR NOTES: GBUNDLES, STACKS AND (SEPT. 15, 2009) DENNIS GAITSGORY 1. Gbundles 1.1. Let G be an affine algebraic group over a ground field k. We assume that k is algebraically closed. Definition 1.2.
More informationNotes on Localisation of gmodules
Notes on Localisation of gmodules Aron Heleodoro January 12, 2014 Let g be a semisimple Lie algebra over a field k. One is normally interested in representation of g, i.e. gmodules. If g were commutative,
More informationSEMINAR NOTES: HITCHIN FIBERS AND AFFINE SPRINGER FIBERS, OCTOBER 29 AND NOVEMBER 5, 2009
SEMINAR NOTES: HITCHIN FIBERS AND AFFINE SPRINGER FIBERS, OCTOBER 29 AND NOVEMBER 5, 2009 ROMAN BEZRUKAVNVIKOV 1. Affine Springer fibers The goal of the talk is to introduce affine Springer fibers and
More informationClassification of Cartan matrices
Chapter 7 Classification of Cartan matrices In this chapter we describe a classification of generalised Cartan matrices This classification can be compared as the rough classification of varieties in terms
More informationGROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV
GROUP ALGEBRAS. ANDREI YAFAEV We will associate a certain algebra to a finite group and prove that it is semisimple. Then we will apply Wedderburn s theory to its study. Definition 0.1. Let G be a finite
More informationThe determinant of a skewsymmetric matrix is a square. This can be seen in small cases by direct calculation: 0 a. 12 a. a 13 a 24 a 14 a 23 a 14
4 Symplectic groups In this and the next two sections, we begin the study of the groups preserving reflexive sesquilinear forms or quadratic forms. We begin with the symplectic groups, associated with
More informationNOTES ON CATEGORIES AND FUNCTORS
NOTES ON CATEGORIES AND FUNCTORS These notes collect basic definitions and facts about categories and functors that have been mentioned in the Homological Algebra course. For further reading about category
More informationLifting abelian schemes: theorems of SerreTate and Grothendieck
Lifting abelian schemes: theorems of SerreTate and Grothendieck Gabriel Dospinescu Remark 0.1. J ai décidé d écrire ces notes en anglais, car il y a trop d accents auxquels il faut faire gaffe... 1 The
More informationFIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES
FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES BRIAN OSSERMAN 1. Fiber products and Zariski sheaves We recall the definition of a fiber product: Definition 1.1. Let C be a category, and X, Y, Z objects of C. Fix also
More informationG = G 0 > G 1 > > G k = {e}
Proposition 49. 1. A group G is nilpotent if and only if G appears as an element of its upper central series. 2. If G is nilpotent, then the upper central series and the lower central series have the same
More informationQUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN S INTEGRABLE SYSTEM AND HECKE EIGENSHEAVES
QUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN S INTEGRABLE SYSTEM AND HECKE EIGENSHEAVES A. BEILINSON AND V. DRINFELD 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Subject classes here. This research was partially supported by INTAS
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS
SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS Ivan Kolář Abstract. Let F be a fiber product preserving bundle functor on the category FM m of the proper base order r. We deduce that the rth
More informationA result of Gabber. by A.J. de Jong
A result of Gabber by A.J. de Jong 1 The result Let X be a scheme endowed with an ample invertible sheaf L. See EGA II, Definition 4.5.3. In particular, X is supposed quasicompact and separated. 1.1 Theorem.
More informationGroup Theory. Contents
Group Theory Contents Chapter 1: Review... 2 Chapter 2: Permutation Groups and Group Actions... 3 Orbits and Transitivity... 6 Specific Actions The Right regular and coset actions... 8 The Conjugation
More informationCONNECTIONS ON PRINCIPAL GBUNDLES
CONNECTIONS ON PRINCIPAL GBUNDLES RAHUL SHAH Abstract. We will describe connections on principal Gbundles via two perspectives: that of distributions and that of connection 1forms. We will show that
More informationDEFINITION OF PURE HODGE MODULES
DEFINITION OF PURE HODGE MODULES DONGKWAN KIM 1. Previously in the Seminar... 1 2. Nearby and Vanishing Cycles 2 3. Strict Support 4 4. Compatibility of Nearby and Vanishing Cycles and the Filtration 5
More informationOn Bhargava s representations and Vinberg s invariant theory
On Bhargava s representations and Vinberg s invariant theory Benedict H. Gross Department of Mathematics, Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 gross@math.harvard.edu January, 2011 1 Introduction Manjul
More informationThe Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
More informationMathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces
Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 19967 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are
More informationIf I and J are graded ideals, then since Ĩ, J are ideal sheaves, there is a canonical homomorphism J OX. It is equal to the composite
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 2.5 2.9 2.5. Sheaf associated to a graded module. (2.5.1). If M is a graded S module, then M (f) is an S (f) module, giving a quasicoherent sheaf M (f) on Spec(S
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 22 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Discrete valuation rings: Dimension 1 Noetherian regular local rings 1 Last day, we discussed the Zariski tangent space, and saw that it
More informationBABY VERMA MODULES FOR RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS
BABY VERMA MODULES FOR RATIONAL CHEREDNIK ALGEBRAS SETH SHELLEYABRAHAMSON Abstract. These are notes for a talk in the MITNortheastern Spring 2015 Geometric Representation Theory Seminar. The main source
More informationSeminar: Stacks and Construction of M g Winter term 2016/17 Time: Thursday 46pm Room: Room 0.008
Seminar: Stacks and Construction of M g Winter term 2016/17 Time: Thursday 46pm Room: Room 0.008 Contact: Ulrike Rieß Professor: Prof. Dr. Daniel Huybrechts First session for introduction (& organization):
More informationProof. The map. G n i. where d is the degree of D.
7. Divisors Definition 7.1. We say that a scheme X is regular in codimension one if every local ring of dimension one is regular, that is, the quotient m/m 2 is one dimensional, where m is the unique maximal
More informationRow Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms
Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008) Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms David Eisenbud & Bernd Ulrich Affectionately dedicated to Mel Hochster, who has been an inspiration to us for many years, on the occasion
More informationMATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0534405967. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column
More informationON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS
ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for
More informationOn the existence of Gequivariant maps
CADERNOS DE MATEMÁTICA 12, 69 76 May (2011) ARTIGO NÚMERO SMA# 345 On the existence of Gequivariant maps Denise de Mattos * Departamento de Matemática, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação,
More informationBASIC FACTS ABOUT WEAKLY SYMMETRIC SPACES
BASIC FACTS ABOUT WEAKLY SYMMETRIC SPACES GIZEM KARAALI 1. Symmetric Spaces Symmetric spaces in the sense of E. Cartan supply major examples in Riemannian geometry. The study of their structure is connected
More informationOSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS
OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS KEITH CONRAD Ostrowski classified the nontrivial absolute values on Q: up to equivalence, they are the usual (archimedean) absolute value and the padic absolute values for
More informationQUOTIENTS IN ALGEBRAIC AND SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY
QUOTIENTS IN ALGEBRAIC AND SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY VICTORIA HOSKINS 1. Introduction In this course we study methods for constructing quotients of group actions in algebraic and symplectic geometry and the
More informationEXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010
EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010 EYAL Z. GOREN (1) Let G be a group and H Z(G) a subgroup such that G/H is cyclic. Prove that G is abelian. Conclude that every group of order p 2 (p a prime
More information3. Prime and maximal ideals. 3.1. Definitions and Examples.
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 5 3.1. Definitions and Examples. 3. Prime and maximal ideals Definition. An ideal P in a ring A is called prime if P A and if for every pair x, y of elements in A\P we have xy P. Equivalently,
More informationGalois representations with open image
Galois representations with open image Ralph Greenberg University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA May 7th, 2011 Introduction This talk will be about representations of the absolute Galois group
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS
Actes, Congrès intern. Math., 1970. Tome 2, p. 47 à 51. COHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS by Daniel QUILLEN * This is a report of research done at the Institute for Advanced Study the past year. It includes some general
More informationThe cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics
The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics Iordan Ganev December 2011 Abstract The subgroup U of unit quaternions is isomorphic to SU(2) and is a double cover of SO(3). This allows a simple computation of
More informationOn The Existence Of Flips
On The Existence Of Flips Hacon and McKernan s paper, arxiv alggeom/0507597 Brian Lehmann, February 2007 1 Introduction References: Hacon and McKernan s paper, as above. Kollár and Mori, Birational Geometry
More informationStructure of the Root Spaces for Simple Lie Algebras
Structure of the Root Spaces for Simple Lie Algebras I. Introduction A Cartan subalgebra, H, of a Lie algebra, G, is a subalgebra, H G, such that a. H is nilpotent, i.e., there is some n such that (H)
More informationDIMENSIONS OF AFFINE SPRINGER FIBERS FOR SOME GL N SYMMETRIC SPACES
DIMENSIONS OF AFFINE SPRINGER FIBERS FOR SOME GL N SYMMETRIC SPACES JASON K.C. POLÁK Abstract. We determine a formula for the dimension of a family of affine Springer fibers associated to a symmetric space
More informationLinear Codes. In the V[n,q] setting, the terms word and vector are interchangeable.
Linear Codes Linear Codes In the V[n,q] setting, an important class of codes are the linear codes, these codes are the ones whose code words form a subvector space of V[n,q]. If the subspace of V[n,q]
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS 1. SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES 1.1. Representation of a linear system. The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 +
More informationFIBRATION SEQUENCES AND PULLBACK SQUARES. Contents. 2. Connectivity and fiber sequences. 3
FIRTION SEQUENES ND PULLK SQURES RY MLKIEWIH bstract. We lay out some foundational facts about fibration sequences and pullback squares of topological spaces. We pay careful attention to connectivity ranges
More informationFIBER BUNDLES AND UNIVALENCE
FIBER BUNDLES AND UNIVALENCE TALK BY IEKE MOERDIJK; NOTES BY CHRIS KAPULKIN This talk presents a proof that a universal Kan fibration is univalent. The talk was given by Ieke Moerdijk during the conference
More informationGEOMETRIC REPRESENTATION THEORY, FALL 2005. Some references
GEOMETRIC REPRESENTATION THEORY, FALL 2005 Some references 1) J. P. Serre, Complex semisimple Lie algebras. 2) T. Springer, Linear algebraic groups. 3) A course on Dmodules by J. Bernstein, availiable
More informationGroup Theory. 1 Cartan Subalgebra and the Roots. November 23, 2011. 1.1 Cartan Subalgebra. 1.2 Root system
Group Theory November 23, 2011 1 Cartan Subalgebra and the Roots 1.1 Cartan Subalgebra Let G be the Lie algebra, if h G it is called a subalgebra of G. Now we seek a basis in which [x, T a ] = ζ a T a
More informationQuantum Mechanics and Representation Theory
Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory Peter Woit Columbia University Texas Tech, November 21 2013 Peter Woit (Columbia University) Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory November 2013 1 / 30
More informationThe Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem
The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }
More informationMatrix generators for exceptional groups of Lie type
J. Symbolic Computation (2000) 11, 1 000 Matrix generators for exceptional groups of Lie type R. B. HOWLETT, L. J. RYLANDS AND D. E. TAYLOR School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Australia
More informationMath 4310 Handout  Quotient Vector Spaces
Math 4310 Handout  Quotient Vector Spaces Dan Collins The textbook defines a subspace of a vector space in Chapter 4, but it avoids ever discussing the notion of a quotient space. This is understandable
More informationA NOTE ON TRIVIAL FIBRATIONS
A NOTE ON TRIVIAL FIBRATIONS Petar Pavešić Fakulteta za Matematiko in Fiziko, Univerza v Ljubljani, Jadranska 19, 1111 Ljubljana, Slovenija petar.pavesic@fmf.unilj.si Abstract We study the conditions
More informationCommutative Algebra seminar talk
Commutative Algebra seminar talk Reeve Garrett May 22, 2015 1 Ultrafilters Definition 1.1 Given an infinite set W, a collection U of subsets of W which does not contain the empty set and is closed under
More informationMath 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick
Math 231b Lecture 35 G. Quick 35. Lecture 35: Sphere bundles and the Adams conjecture 35.1. Sphere bundles. Let X be a connected finite cell complex. We saw that the Jhomomorphism could be defined by
More informationSpherical representations and the Satake isomorphism
Spherical representations and the Satake isomorphism Last updated: December 10, 2013. Topics: otivation for the study of spherical representations; Satake isomorphism stated for the general case of a connected
More informationTHE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE
THE DIMENSION OF A VECTOR SPACE KEITH CONRAD This handout is a supplementary discussion leading up to the definition of dimension and some of its basic properties. Let V be a vector space over a field
More informationSimilarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices
MATH022 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 48 Similarity and Diagonalization Similar Matrices Let A and B be n n matrices. We say that A is similar to B if there is an invertible n n matrix P such that
More informationON FOCKGONCHAROV COORDINATES OF THE ONCEPUNCTURED TORUS GROUP
ON FOCKGONCHAROV COORDINATES OF THE ONCEPUNCTURED TORUS GROUP YUICHI KABAYA Introduction In their seminal paper [3], Fock and Goncharov defined positive representations of the fundamental group of a
More informationCONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS
CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS KEITH CONRAD For a group theorist, Sylow s Theorem is such a basic tool, and so fundamental, that it is used almost without thinking, like breathing. Geoff Robinson 1.
More informationI. GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES
I GROUPS: BASIC DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES Definition 1: An operation on a set G is a function : G G G Definition 2: A group is a set G which is equipped with an operation and a special element e G, called
More informationRevision of ring theory
CHAPTER 1 Revision of ring theory 1.1. Basic definitions and examples In this chapter we will revise and extend some of the results on rings that you have studied on previous courses. A ring is an algebraic
More informationarxiv:math/0402080v1 [math.nt] 5 Feb 2004
BIEXTENSIONS OF 1MOTIVES BY 1MOTIVES arxiv:math/0402080v1 [math.nt] 5 Feb 2004 CRISTIANA BERTOLIN Abstract. Let S be a scheme. In this paper, we define the notion of biextensions of 1motives by 1motives.
More informationPOSTECH SUMMER SCHOOL 2013 LECTURE 4 INTRODUCTION TO THE TRACE FORMULA
POSTECH SUMMER SCHOOL 2013 LECTURE 4 INTRODUCTION TO THE TRACE FORMULA 1. Kernel and the trace formula Beginning from this lecture, we will discuss the approach to Langlands functoriality conjecture based
More information1 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Math 20 Chapter 5 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. Definition: A scalar λ is called an eigenvalue of the n n matrix A is there is a nontrivial solution x of Ax = λx. Such an x
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 16 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. Valuation rings (and nonsingular points of curves) 1 1.1. Completions 2 1.2. A big result from commutative algebra 3 Problem sets back.
More informationLinear Codes. Chapter 3. 3.1 Basics
Chapter 3 Linear Codes In order to define codes that we can encode and decode efficiently, we add more structure to the codespace. We shall be mainly interested in linear codes. A linear code of length
More informationIdeal Class Group and Units
Chapter 4 Ideal Class Group and Units We are now interested in understanding two aspects of ring of integers of number fields: how principal they are (that is, what is the proportion of principal ideals
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear
More informationLINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN
LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN c W W L Chen, 1997, 2008 This chapter is available free to all individuals, on understanding that it is not to be used for financial gain, and may be downloaded and/or photocopied,
More informationU.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory
More informationGROUPS WITH TWO EXTREME CHARACTER DEGREES AND THEIR NORMAL SUBGROUPS
GROUPS WITH TWO EXTREME CHARACTER DEGREES AND THEIR NORMAL SUBGROUPS GUSTAVO A. FERNÁNDEZALCOBER AND ALEXANDER MORETÓ Abstract. We study the finite groups G for which the set cd(g) of irreducible complex
More informationTHE AVERAGE DEGREE OF AN IRREDUCIBLE CHARACTER OF A FINITE GROUP
THE AVERAGE DEGREE OF AN IRREDUCIBLE CHARACTER OF A FINITE GROUP by I. M. Isaacs Mathematics Department University of Wisconsin 480 Lincoln Dr. Madison, WI 53706 USA EMail: isaacs@math.wisc.edu Maria
More informationNOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS
NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Definition 1. Let V and W be vector spaces. A function T : V W is a linear transformation from V to W if the following two properties hold. i T v + v = T v + T v for all
More informationNumerical Analysis Lecture Notes
Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number
More informationA CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE
A CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE DANIEL A. RAMRAS In these notes we present a construction of the universal cover of a path connected, locally path connected, and semilocally simply
More informationMATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS
MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS Systems of Equations and Matrices Representation of a linear system The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a x + a 2 x 2 + + a n x n b a
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationChapter 7: Products and quotients
Chapter 7: Products and quotients Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 42, Spring 24 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 7: Products
More informationChapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.
Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize
More informationINVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS
INVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS NATHAN BROWN, RACHEL FINCK, MATTHEW SPENCER, KRISTOPHER TAPP, AND ZHONGTAO WU Abstract. We classify the leftinvariant metrics with nonnegative
More informationInvariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 50 (1), 2007 pp. 24 34 Invariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups Nathan Brown, Rachel Finck, Matthew Spencer, Kristopher Tapp and Zhongtao Wu Abstract.
More informationNOTES ON MEASURE THEORY. M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete. Autumn of 2004
NOTES ON MEASURE THEORY M. Papadimitrakis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Autumn of 2004 2 Contents 1 σalgebras 7 1.1 σalgebras............................... 7 1.2 Generated σalgebras.........................
More information11 Ideals. 11.1 Revisiting Z
11 Ideals The presentation here is somewhat different than the text. In particular, the sections do not match up. We have seen issues with the failure of unique factorization already, e.g., Z[ 5] = O Q(
More informationISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD
ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction An isometry of R n is a function h: R n R n that preserves the distance between vectors: h(v) h(w) = v w for all v and w in R n, where (x 1,..., x n ) = x
More informationSMALL SKEW FIELDS CÉDRIC MILLIET
SMALL SKEW FIELDS CÉDRIC MILLIET Abstract A division ring of positive characteristic with countably many pure types is a field Wedderburn showed in 1905 that finite fields are commutative As for infinite
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 24
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. Degree of a line bundle / invertible sheaf 1 1.1. Last time 1 1.2. New material 2 2. The sheaf of differentials of a nonsingular curve
More informationInner Product Spaces and Orthogonality
Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality week 34 Fall 2006 Dot product of R n The inner product or dot product of R n is a function, defined by u, v a b + a 2 b 2 + + a n b n for u a, a 2,, a n T, v b,
More informationRINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY
RINGS WITH A POLYNOMIAL IDENTITY IRVING KAPLANSKY 1. Introduction. In connection with his investigation of projective planes, M. Hall [2, Theorem 6.2]* proved the following theorem: a division ring D in
More information2.5 Gaussian Elimination
page 150 150 CHAPTER 2 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations 37 10 the linear algebra package of Maple, the three elementary 20 23 1 row operations are 12 1 swaprow(a,i,j): permute rows i and j 3 3
More informationSolving Systems of Linear Equations
LECTURE 5 Solving Systems of Linear Equations Recall that we introduced the notion of matrices as a way of standardizing the expression of systems of linear equations In today s lecture I shall show how
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Keerthi Madapusi
Algebraic Geometry Keerthi Madapusi Contents Chapter 1. Schemes 5 1. Spec of a Ring 5 2. Schemes 11 3. The Affine Communication Lemma 13 4. A Criterion for Affineness 15 5. Irreducibility and Connectedness
More informationNotes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan
The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor
More informationABSTRACT ALGEBRA. Romyar Sharifi
ABSTRACT ALGEBRA Romyar Sharifi Contents Introduction 7 Part 1. A First Course 11 Chapter 1. Set theory 13 1.1. Sets and functions 13 1.2. Relations 15 1.3. Binary operations 19 Chapter 2. Group theory
More informationFiber bundles. Chapter 23. c Amitabha Lahiri: Lecture Notes on Differential Geometry for Physicists 2011
Chapter 23 Fiber bundles Consider a manifold M with the tangent bundle T M = P M T P M. Let us look at this more closely. T M can be thought of as the original manifold M with a tangent space stuck at
More informationBUNDLES, CLASSIFYING SPACES AND CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES
BUNDLES, CLASSIFYING SPACES AND CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES CHRIS KOTTKE Contents Introduction 1 1. Bundles 2 1.1. Pullback 2 1.2. Sections 3 1.3. Fiber bundles as fibrations 4 2. Vector bundles 4 2.1. Whitney
More informationDEFORMATION OF DIRAC STRUCTURES ALONG ISOTROPIC SUBBUNDLES. and MARCO ZAMBON
Vol. 65 (2010) REPORTS ON MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS No. 2 DEFORMATION OF DIRAC STRUCTURES ALONG ISOTROPIC SUBBUNDLES IVÁN CALVO Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, Asociación EURATOMCIEMAT, E28040 Madrid, Spain
More informationÉtale groupoids and their morphisms
Étale groupoids and their morphisms Ganna Kudryavtseva University of Ljubljana Semigroup Representations 2013 Edinburgh Ganna Kudryavtseva (Ljubljana) Étale groupoids and their morphisms April 11, 2013
More informationGROUPS ACTING ON A SET
GROUPS ACTING ON A SET MATH 435 SPRING 2012 NOTES FROM FEBRUARY 27TH, 2012 1. Left group actions Definition 1.1. Suppose that G is a group and S is a set. A left (group) action of G on S is a rule for
More informationANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories
ANAGRAMS: Dimension of triangulated categories Julia Ramos González February 7, 2014 Abstract These notes were prepared for the first session of "Dimension functions" of ANAGRAMS seminar. The goal is to
More informationSets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces
Communications in Mathematical Physics ManuscriptNr. (will be inserted by hand later) Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Stefan BechtluftSachs, Marco Hien Naturwissenschaftliche
More informationMATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set.
MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set. Vector space A vector space is a set V equipped with two operations, addition V V (x,y) x + y V and scalar
More informationPrime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials
Prime Numbers and Irreducible Polynomials M. Ram Murty The similarity between prime numbers and irreducible polynomials has been a dominant theme in the development of number theory and algebraic geometry.
More information