36 2 Vol. 36, No ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA Mar., 周 洁 王 东 (,, )

Transcription

1 36 2 Vol. 36, No ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA Mar., DOI: /SP.J 周 洁 王 东 (,, ) : (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) (M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang) ( cm) ( ) ;,,, ;,,,, : ; ; ; ; 中 图 分 类 号 : Q948.8 文 献 标 识 码 : A 文 章 编 号 : (2012) ( ) [1 3], [4 8] (Colonization) (Regeneration) [9], [10],, [1, 11 13],, [14 16] ;, [14, 17, 18] ;, [19 22], (Myriophyllum spicatum L.), ; (M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang), [23, 24],,,,, (M. spicatum L.) (M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang) (N , E ) cm 收 稿 日 期 : ; 修 订 日 期 : 基 金 项 目 : ( ); (CCNU09B01002) 作 者 简 介 : (1987 ),, ; ; zhoujieccnu@gmail.com 通 讯 作 者 :, dongwang.cn@gmail.com

2 2 : 317 (N 30 30, E ), , cm 5 cm(s) 10 cm(m) 15 cm(l); (, Apex) (, Midstem) (, Bottom) 16 cm 10 cm 12.5 cm ( ),,, [ (1.97 ± 0.03) mg/g, (0.13 ± 0.02) mg/g, ], , 5, 3, 2 ( 1) 200 cm 150 cm 40 cm ( ) 20 cm 1.3 6,, ( ), 60 48h, SPSS 16.0, (Two-way analysis of variance), Duncan (Duncan s multiple comparison test) T-test (log 10 -transformed), (SQRT-transformed) (P < 0.05)( 2),, 0.10 g 表 1 试 验 设 计 Tab. 1 The experimental design Length of fragment Location of fragment 5 cm (S) 10 cm (M) 15 cm (L) ( ) Apex 5 cm (S) Apex 10 cm (M) Apex 15 cm (L) Apex ( ) Midstem 5 cm (S) Midstem 10 cm (M) Midstem 15 cm (L) Midstem ( ) Bottom 5 cm (S) Bottom 10 cm (M) Bottom 15 cm (L) Bottom 表 2 断 枝 长 度 位 置 及 其 交 互 作 用 对 穗 花 狐 尾 藻 和 扬 子 狐 尾 藻 的 生 长 特 征 影 响 的 F 值 和 显 著 性 分 析 Tab. 2 F-values and significance levels for factorial ANOVAs of the effect of fragment length and fragment location, and their interaction on morphological traits and biomass production in M. spicatum L. and M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang Species M. spicatum M. oguraense subsp. yangtzense Dependent variable Length of fragment (df=2) Location of fragment (df=2) Length location (df=4) Total biomass ** ** ** Branch mass ** ** ** Branch number ** ** ns Average branch length ** ** * Branch position ** * ** Total biomass ** ** ** Branch mass ** ** ** Branch number ** ** ** Average branch length ** ** ** Branch position ** * ns : ns, *, ** P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01 Note: ns, *, ** indicate significant difference between treatments at P > 0.05, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively

3 g, 0.05 g 0.25 g ( 1 2) (P < 0.05)( 1 2), 15 cm 4, 15 cm 1, 5 cm 10 cm ( 2) (10 cm ), (10 cm 15 cm ) 2.2 (P < 0.05)( 2),, 15 cm 0.26 g 0.04 g, 15 cm 0.25 g 0.10 g, (P < 0.05)( 1), ;,, ( 15 cm, )( 1 2),,,, ( 2) [25, 26],, [4, 5, 13] 1 Fig. 1 Total biomass and branch biomass of M. spicatum and M. oguraense subsp. yangtzense at different treatments of fragment length and fragment location (Mean ± SE),, P < 0.05; T-test * +, * P < 0.05, + P > 0.05 Different superscript letters (the capital letters for the effect of fragment length, the lower-case letters represent for the effect of fragment location, respectively) on each bar denote when significance differences were observed at P < 0.05 according to Duncan s multiple comparison test after ANOVA. Bars with * are significantly different at P < 0.05 between two species (+: no significance)

4 2 : Fig. 2 Branch number, average branch length and branch position (distance between the node branch inserted and the apex of stem) of M. spicatum and M. oguraense subsp. yangtzense at different treatments of fragment length and fragment location (Mean ± SE),,, [14 16, 20], ( ) ( ) ( ),,,,,,,,, [13, 17, 18],,, (Elodea canadensis Michx.) [16] ;, [14, 27], (Potamogeton crispus L.) [15] 3.2 [13, 23, 24, 28], (Survival tactics): ( ) ( ),

5 [16, 28, 29] Barrat-Segretain, et al.,,,,,, [13, 29], 20 cm,,,,,, ;,,, [25, 26], [10, 13], : [1] Kimbel J C. Factors influencing potential intralake colonization by Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J]. Aquatic Botany, 1982, 14(4): [2] Smith C S, Barko J W. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1990, 28(2): [3] Madsen J D, Smith D H. Vegetative of Eurasian watermilfoil colonies [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1997, 35(2): [4] Nilsson C. Distribution of stream-edge vegetation along a gradient of current velocity [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1987, 75(2): [5] Sabol B M. Environmental effects of aquatic dispersal of chopped Hydrilla [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1987, 25(1): [6] Bornette G, Amoros C. Disturbance regimes and vegetation dynamics: role of floods in riverine wetlands [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1996, 7(5): [7] Santamaría L. Why most aquatic plants are widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity [J]. Acta Oecologia, 2002, 23(3): [8] Combroux I C S, Bornette G. Propagule banks and regenerative strategies of aquatic plants [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2004, 15(1): [9] Madsen J D, Eichler L W, Boylen C W. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1988, 26(2): [10] Campbell M L. Recruitment and colonization of vegetative fragments of Posidonia australis and Posidonia coriacea [J]. Aquatic Botany, 2003, 76(2): [11] Grace J B, Wetzel R G. The production biology of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review [J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 1978, 16(1): 1 11 [12] Aiken S G, Newroth P R, Wile I. The biology of Canadian weeds: 34. Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1979, 59(1): [13] Barrat-Segretain M H, Bornette G, Hering-Vilas-Bôas A. Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration among aquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats [J]. Aquatic Botany, 1998, 60(3): [14] Wu Z, Zuo J, Ma J, et al. Establishing submersed macrophytes via sinking and colonization of shoot fragments clipped off manually [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2007, 12(3): [15] Jiang J, An S, Zhou C, et al. Fragment propagation and colonization ability enhanced and varied at node level after escaping from apical dominance in submerged macrophytes [J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2009, 51(3): [16] Riis T, Madsen T V, Sennels R S H. Regeneration, colonization and growth rates of all fragments in four common stream plants [J]. Aquatic Botany, 2009, 90(2): [17] Cline M G. Apical dominance [J]. Botanical Review, 1991, 57(4): [18] De Vries D P, Dubois L A M. Variation in the shoot production of Sonia cut rose plants, originating from grafting scions of different nodal positions [J]. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 1992, 57(1): [19] Chen H D. Life history, biomass and cut-branch propagation of Potamogeton crispus L. [J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 1985, 9(1): [.., 1985, 9(1): 29 32] [20] Gao Y, Yu X M, Liu J, et al. Production of adventitious roots and buds on fragments of Myriophyllum spicatum L. [J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2007, 31(5): [,,,.., 2007, 31(5): ] [21] Ge X G, Wang G X, Lu Y C. Study on regeneration ability of segment in four submerged macrophytes [J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2009, 2(4): [,,.

6 2 : , 2009, 2(4): 23 28] [22] Ma J M, Hu L W, Hu Q R, et al. Regeneration of fragments of Elodea nuttallii and Hydrilla verticillata [J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2010, 34(3): [,,,.., 2010, 34(3): ] [23] Yu D, Wang D, Li Z Y, et al. Taxonomic revision of the genus Myriophyllum (Haloragaceae) in China [J]. Rhodora, 2002, 104(920): [24] Wang D, Yu D. A new subspecies of Myriophyllum oguraense (Haloragaceae) from China [J]. Annales Botanici Fennici, 2007, 44(3): [25] Sculthorpe C D. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants [M]. London: Edward Arnold. 1967, 610 [26] Barrat-Segretain M H. Strategies of reproduction, dispersion and competition in river plants: a review [J]. Vegetation, 1996, 123(1): [27] Mielecki M, Peiczynska E. The influence of fragmentation on the growth of Elodea canadensis Michx. in different light conditions [J]. Polish Journal of Ecology, 2005, 53(2): [28] Southwood T R E. Tactics, Strategies and templates [J]. Oikos, 1988, 52(1): 3 18 [29] Barrat-Segretain M H, Henry C P, Bornette G. Regeneration and colonization of aquatic plant fragments in relation to the disturbance frequency of their habitats [J]. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 1999, 145(1):

7 SURVIVAL STRATEGIES OF STEM FRAGMENTS IN NARROW ENDEMIC AND WIDESPREAD PLANTS OF THE AQUATIC GENUS MYRIOPHYLLUM ZHOU Jie and WANG Dong (Laboratory of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan , China) Abstract: For some aquatic macrophytes, stem fragment formed by disturbance plays a key role in the dispersal and establishment of the species. Previous studies have been focused on the regeneration abilities of sterm fragments of a range of aquatic species. However, the information on regeneration ability of fragments between narrow endemic and its congeneric widespread species is lacking. Our study examined the combined effects of fragment length and fragment location on regeneration performances of narrow endemic (Myriophyllum oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang) and widespread (M. spicatum L.) species, two submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes of the lower Yangtze River basin of China, by an outdoor experiment. Stem fragments from one genotype of population were planted separately in plastic pots by three fragment lengths (5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm) and three fragment locations (apex, midstem and bottom). The objective of this study were to determine (1) whether fragment length and location correlate with the growth and regeneration abilities of the studied species, and (2) whether the growth and regeneration abilities of fragments differ between the narrow endemic and its congenetic widespread species. The results showed that total plant biomass, total branch biomass and branch number increased significantly with increasing fragment length between all treatments at the fragment level for both species. Total plant biomass, total branch biomass and branch number were greatly different between three length treatments, which were the greatest for fragments of 15 cm in length compared with the other two fragment length treatments. Additionally, the growth and regeneration performance of the studied species were significantly affected by fragment location. There were remarkable differences between the growth of sterm fragments with apices and those without apices. Plant from apical fragments had the largest plant biomass, and midstem fragments regenerated the largest branch biomass, the most lateral branches and the longest branches. Fragments without apices showed significant greater branch number and branch biomass compared with the ones with apices, except that those traits of bottom fragments were intermediate. Meanwhile, plant biomass, branch biomass, branch number, average branch length and branch position inserted at the stem were found to be significantly different between the species studied. For M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang, fragments regenerated larger branch biomass, more lateral branches and longer branches, while fragments produced larger total plant biomass for M. spicatum L., indicating that different regenerative strategies of fragments occurred between the two species. Moreover, apical fragment of M. spicatum L. regenerated lateral branches at the bottom of the stem, while all fragments of M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang produced lateral branches at the top of stem. The present data confirmed the previous conclusion that larger fragments had higher regeneration abilities than smaller fragments and the regeneration potential of fragments with an apical tip was greater than fragments without an apical tip. Our study implied that the regrowth patterns differ between the studied species. M. spicatum L. was prone to increase investment in plant biomass while M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang was prone to invest more to reproduction of lateral branches. This suggested that regeneration performances of fragments of the studied macrophytes were species-specific and fragment trait-dependent, and the results might provide reference for biodiversity conservation and wetland vegetation management. Key words: Fragment; Growth; Regeneration; Myriophyllum spicatum L.; M. oguraense Miki subsp. yangtzense Wang