Curriculum Vitae Dr Jeroen van der Heijden

Transcription

1 Regulatory Institutions Network Australian National University Van der Heijden, 1 of 22 Amsterdam Law School University of Amsterdam [email protected] Curriculum Vitae Dr Jeroen van der Heijden Experience keywords: governance for urban sustainability and resilience, environmental governance, urban governance, climate change governance, policy and administration, socio-legal scholarship, regulation and governance, comparative policy analysis, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) Qualifications 2009 PhD in Public Policy (highest honours, top 5%), Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Concentration: regulation and enforcement, public sector reform, privatisation 2002 MSc in Architecture (high distinction equivalent, 8/10), Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Concentration: urban renewal in post-communist society (Croatia) Academic positions and responsibilities since PhD present Associate Professor, Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands Principal investigator, voluntary environmental governance project (VENI) PhD supervisor (2 PhD students and 1 completed) Assistant Professor from present Senior Research Fellow, Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), Australian National University, Australia Principal investigator, environmental governance research project (DECRA) Co-director Climate and Energy Governance Network (CEGNet) Editor, RegNet LSN Law Research Centers Papers (ejournal through SSRN) Course convenor and Tutor, Law and Regulation Course, College of Law PhD supervisor (4 PhD students) Research Fellow from Assistant Professor, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Lead investigator in various government funded research projects Course convenor and Tutor of various BSc and MSc courses MSc thesis supervisor (Masters by Research theses) Relevant grants since PhD DECRA grant, Australian Research Council (A$360,000; one out of only two DECRAs awarded in the Policy and Administration category nationally) VENI early career researchers grant, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research ( 250,000) Various travel and research grants, Australian National University (total A$17,500) EU research grant, Commission of the European Communities ( 250,000)

2 Van der Heijden, 2 of 22 Visiting positions since PhD 2014 Visiting Associate, LSE Cities, London School of Economics, United Kingdom (host: Professor Ricky Burdett) Visiting Fellow, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom (host: Professor Andrew Jordan) 2013 Visiting Fellow, Centre for Southeast Asian & Pacific Studies, Sri Venkateswara University, India (host: Dr. Gundre Jayachandra Reddy) 2011 Visiting Fellow, Department of Political Science, University of Washington, USA (host: Professor Peter May) Visiting Research Fellow, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (host: Professor Christopher Hood). Publications (synopsis) See page 5 and beyond for a full overview of publications 4 academic books (and 2 in preparation) 6 chapters in peer-reviewed academic books 36 peer reviewed journal articles o h-index = 9; i10-index = 9 o total impact factor journal articles = conference submissions (invited and other) 40+ publications for a policy, practitioner and lay audience Research expertise and research experience since PhD present Principal investigator, Revising theories on voluntary environmental governance Concentration: governance for urban sustainability and resilience Methodology: Comparative (fsqca), qualitative and quantitative data; Australia, Europe, India, Malaysia, US, and Singapore (200+ elite interviews) Funded by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research ( 250,000) Information: Co-principal investigator, project coordinator, and co-author of tender, The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands Concentration: water policy, policy implementation Methodology: Comparative; the Netherlands (50 elite interviews and survey) Funded by the Dutch Ministry of Water Management ( 120,000) Co-principal investigator, project coordinator, and co-author of tender, European Lead Market Initiatives in Sustainable Construction Concentration: sustainable construction, regulation, enforcement Methodology: Comparative; 27 EU countries (30 elite interviews and survey) Funded by the Commission of the European Communities ( 250,000) Investigator, Applied story telling Concentration: business administration, learning techniques Methodology: qualitative (40 elite interviews) Funded by the Royal Dutch Shell ( 110,000) Co-principal investigator, project coordinator, and co-author of tenders, Alternative approaches to Dutch building control (various projects) Concentration: construction policy, regulation, enforcement Methodology: mixed methods, qualitative and quantitative data Various projects funded by the Dutch Ministry of Housing, the Environmental Agency Brabant, and the Cities of Amsterdam and Eindhoven ( 143,000 total)

3 Van der Heijden, 3 of 22 Teaching and supervision since PhD Student evaluations are available upon request Coursework Built Environment Bachelor Program (under graduate) NTI University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands Senior advisor in Program development POGO8196, Research Design in Political Research (post graduate, 20 students) Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Australia Guest tutor Comparative Law and Comparative Legal Research (graduate, 20 students) Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam Guest tutor Environmental Sciences and Sustainability Master Program (graduate) NCOI University of Applied Sciences, Netherlands Senior advisor in Program development LAWS8034, Law and Regulation (graduate, 30 students) College of Law, Australian National University, Australia Course convenor, developer and tutor 2012 Executive Short Courses (professional, 10 participants) Australian National Institute of Public Policy, Australia Tutor Drafts R Us (post-graduate) Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University, Netherlands Regulatory Institutions Network, Australian National University, Australia Course convenor, developer and tutor SPM1211, Policy and Law 1 (undergraduate, 350 students) Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University, Netherlands Tutor SPM2210, Policy and Law 2 (graduate, 150 students) Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University, Netherlands Course convenor, developer and tutor SPM8001, Process Management (graduate, 40 students) Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Netherlands Tutor and developer SPM4141, Multi Actor System Design (graduate, 25 students) Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University, Netherlands Tutor and developer PhD Supervision Huiqi Yan (University of Amsterdam; completed: 2014) Yunmei Wu (University of Amsterdam) Seung-Hun Hong (Australian National University) Li Na (University of Amsterdam) Allinettes Adigue (Australian National University) Adriana Sanchez Gomez (University of New South Wales) Kuntal Goswami (Charles Darwin University/Australian National University)

4 Van der Heijden, 4 of 22 Masters/Honours Supervision Sushma Mohan (Delft University, Netherlands ; completed: 2011) Muluemebet Getachew (Delft University, Netherlands ; completed: 2011) Felipe Castro Andreas (Delft University, Netherlands; completed: 2011) Sushma Mohan (Delft University, Netherlands; completed: 2010) Francien Bouwmeister (Delft University, Netherlands; completed: 2010) Sybren Hoekstra (Delft University, Netherlands; completed: 2010) Recognition Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (since October 2014) Administration and service present Member of RegNet s Governance Group present Co-director of RegNet s Climate and Energy Governance Network (CEGNet) present Editor of the RegNet LSN Law Research Centers Papers (ejournal, available through SSRN) present Member of three Selection Committees to appoint (i) a full-professor/director position at RegNet, (ii) a communications position at RegNet, and (iii) a Level C (Fellow) position in International relations all at the Australian National University Member of RegNet s Education Committee Member of Nectar s Grant Application Success Working Group present Chair and organiser of various sections and panels at European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) conferences and Law and Society Association (LSA) Annual Meetings Member of OTB s Works Council, Delft University of Technology Member of OTB s PhD Council, Delft University of Technology present Ad hoc reviewer for various journals and publishers, among others: Routledge; Environment & Planning C; Regulation & Governance; Law & Policy; Political Studies; Urban Studies; Int. Political Science Review; Int. Journal of Public Administration; Journal of Housing & the Built Environment; Int. Journal of Law & the Built Environment; Journal of Environmental Planning & Management Ongoing professional development 2015 Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), National University of Singapore Two-week intensive course on QCA theory and application 2013 Foundations of University Teaching and Learning, Centre for Higher Education, Learning & Teaching, Australian National University 10 module course on university teaching theory and practice 2011 Applied statistics, Statistical Consulting Unit, Australian National University Introductory data analysis Regression and generalized linear models 2008 NETHUR Graduate Programme, Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research 6 module course on qualitative and quantitative research methods

5 Van der Heijden, 5 of 22 Publications Dr Jeroen van der Heijden Academic books 1. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience: Responding to Climate Change and the Role of the Built Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Book review by Donald Watson, 2014, 2. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) De voor- en nadelen van privatisering van het bouwtoezicht. (The pros and cons of private sector building control) The Hague: Stichting Instituut voor Bouwrecht Book review by Gert Jan van Leeuwen, 2009, Bouwregels in de Praktijk, 3 3. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) Building regulatory enforcement regimes. Comparative analysis of private sector involvement in the enforcement of public building regulations. (PhD thesis) Amsterdam/Delft: IOS Press/Delft University Press Book review by Heinrich Winter, 2009, 4. Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Competitive Enforcement. Comparative analysis of Australian building regulatory enforcement regimes. Amsterdam/Delft: IOS Press/Delft University Press Book review by Nigel Mensfort, 2010, The Australian Building Surveyor, Autumn 2010 Chapters in academic books (peer reviewed) 1. Jeroen van der Heijden (forthcoming 2015) Networked enforcement, in: Drake, S. & Smith, M. (eds), New Directions in Effective Enforcement of EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2. Jeroen van der Heijden (forthcoming 2015) Urban sustainability and resilience, in: Drahos, P. (ed), Regulation, Institutions and Networks. 3. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Selecting cases and inferential types in comparative public policy research. in: Engeli, I. & Rothmayr, C. (eds), Comparative Policy Studies: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. London: Palgrave, Jeroen van der Heijden, Bertien Broekhans and Ernst ten Heuvelhof (2010), Verwachtingsmanagement in de kolommenstructuur: In de polder domineerde de vraag: mag het een onsje minder? (Expectations in implementing the EU Water Framework Directive), in: Van der Arend, S. et. al. (eds), Tien Jaar Ervaring met de Europese Kaderrichtlijn Water (Implementing the European Water Framework Directive: Ten Years After), The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Management, Bertien Broekhans, Jeroen van der Heijden and Ernst ten Heuvelhof (2010) Convergerende planning en ontkoppeling van beleid: mag het een onsje meer zijn? (The Dutch implementation process of the EU Water Framework Directive), in: Van der Arend, S. et. al. (eds), Tien Jaar Ervaring met de Europese Kaderrichtlijn Water (Implementing the European Water Framework Directive: Ten Years After), Jitske de Jong and Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Vernieuwing door samenwerking. Over het betrekken van private partijen bij het handhaven van publiekrechterlijke bouwregelgeving (On private sector involvement in the enforcement of public building regulations), in: Chao-Duivis, M. et.al. (eds), Alleen Samen (Only in Collaboration), The Hague: Stichting Instituut voor Bouwrecht, Peer-reviewed journal articles 1. Huiqi Yan, Jeroen van der Heijden, and Benjamin van Rooij (accepted 1/6/15) Symmetric and asymmetric motivations for compliance and violation: A crisp set qualitative comparative analysis (csqca) Regulation and Governance (impact factor: 1.351)

6 Van der Heijden, 6 of Mark Kosters and Jeroen van der Heijden (accepted 16/4/15) From Mechanism to Virtue: Evaluating Nudge-Theory. Evaluation 3. Huiqi Yan, Benjamin van Rooij, and Jeroen van der Heijden (accepted 2/4/15) Contextual Compliance: Situational and Subjective Cost-Benefit Decisions about Pesticides by Chinese Farmers. Law and Policy (i.f.: 0.946) 4. Jeroen van der Heijden (accepted 5/2/15) What roles are there for government in voluntary environmental programs? Environmental Policy and Governance (i.f.: 1.117) 5. Jeroen van der Heijden (in press, early view online 2015) The role of government in voluntary environmental programs: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Public Administration, DOI: /padm (i.f.: 1.863) 6. Jeroen van der Heijden (in press, early view online 2014) "On the potential of voluntary environmental programmes for the built environment: A critical analysis of LEED." Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, DOI: /s z (i.f.: 0.611) 7. Jeroen van der Heijden (in press, early view online 2014) What works in environmental policydesign? Lessons from experiments in the Australian and Dutch building sectors. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, DOI: / X (i.f.: 1.421) 8. Jeroen van der Heijden (in press, early view online 2014) Regulatory failures, split-incentives, conflicting interests and a vicious circle of blame: The New Environmental Governance to the rescue? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, DOI: / (i.f.: 1.096) 9. Jeroen van der Heijden (in press, early view online 2013) Interacting state and non-state actors in hybrid settings of public service delivery. Administration & Society, DOI: / (i.f.: 0.759) 10. Jeroen van der Heijden (2015) Voluntary programmes for building retrofits: opportunities, performance and challenges. Building Research & Information, 35(3), (i.f.: 1.319) 11. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) What role is there for the state in contemporary governance? Insights from the Dutch building sector. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 35(3), Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Experimentation in policy-design: Insights from the building sector, Policy Sciences, 47(3), (i.f.: 1.559) 13. Jeroen van der Heijden, Ernst ten Heuvelhof, Sonja van de Arend, Bertien Broekhans, Ellen van Bueren, Casper Harteveld and Theo van Ruijven (2014) Contrasting stories on overcoming governance challenges: The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Local Environment, 19(3), Jeroen van der Heijden and Ernst ten Heuvelhof (2013) Coping with mandated public participation: The case of implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Perspectives on European Policy and Society, 14(4) Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Is new governance the silver bullet? Insights from the Australian buildings sector. Urban Policy and Research, 31(4), (i.f.: 0.694) 16. Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Governing Governance : zware kost in een Jip-en-Janneke-jasje (Governing Governance: Serious theorizing presented lightly). Bestuurskunde 22(4), Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Voluntary environmental governance arrangements in the Australian building sector, Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(3), (i.f.: 0.388) 18. Jeroen van der Heijden and Ellen van Bueren (2013) Regulating sustainable construction in Europe: An inquiry into the European Commission's harmonization attempts. Int. Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 5(1), 5-20.

7 Van der Heijden, 7 of Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Greening the building sector: Roles for building surveyors. Journal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation, 2 (1), Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Different but equally plausible narratives of policy transformation: A plea for theoretical pluralism. International Political Science Review 34(1), (i.f.: 0.474) 21. Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) De geest van het Franse bouwtoezicht in een fragile Nederlandse fles (Review of and critique to proposal to change Dutch building Code enforcement), Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid (Dutch Journal of Public Safety), 12(1), Jeroen van der Heijden and Ernst ten Heuvelhof (2012) The mechanics of virtue: Lessons on public participation from implementing the European Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (3), (i.f.: 1.350) 23. Jeroen van der Heijden (2012) Voluntary Environmental Governance Arrangements. Environmental Politics 21 (3), (i.f.: 1.467) 24. Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Friends, enemies, or strangers? On relationships between public and private sector service providers in hybrid forms of governance. Law & Policy 33 (3), (i.f.: 1.125) 25. Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics 31 (1), (i.f.: 0.604) 26. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Smart Privatization: Lessons from Private-Sector Involvement in Australian and Canadian Building Regulatory Enforcement Regimes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 12 (5), (i.f.: 0.509) 27. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) One task, a few approaches, many impacts. Private sector involvement in Canadian building code enforcement. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), (i.f.: 0.390) 28. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) A short history of studying institutional change. Regulation and Governance 4 (2), (i.f.: 1.625) 29. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Privatization of building code enforcement: a comparative study of regimes in Australia and Canada. Int. J. of Law in the Built Environment, 2(1), Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) On Peanuts and Monkeys: Private sector involvement in Australian building control. Urban Policy and Research 28 (2), (impact factor: 0.694) 31. Jeroen van der Heijden and Ernst ten Heuvelhof (2010) Noord/Zuidlijn Amsterdam. (Failing governance in planning the Amsterdam North-South subway) Tijdschrift voor bouwrecht (Dutch Journal of Law in the Built Environment) 9/161, Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Mix op maat! Over de samenhang tussen gewenste en ongewenste gevolgen van privaat toezicht. (Understanding the outcomes of privatised enforcement) Toezicht (Dutch Journal of Regulatory Enforcement), 1(1), Jeroen van der Heijden and Jitske de Jong (2009) Towards a better understanding of building regulation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(6), (i.f.: 1.084) 34. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) Comparative analysis of building regulation: an analytical tool. Int. Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(1), Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Privaat wat kan, publiek wat moet? Een kritische beschouwing van een ruim geformuleerde sturingsfilosofie. (A critical perspective on Dutch construction policy) Tijdschrift voor bouwrecht (Dutch Journal of Law in the Built Environment), (10), Jeroen van der Heijden, Henk Visscher and Frits Meijer (2007) Problems in enforcing Dutch building regulations. Structural Survey, 24(3/4),

8 Van der Heijden, 8 of 22 Conference and working papers 1. Jeroen van der Heijden (forthcoming 2015) What type of voluntary environmental programmes are effective in a city context, and why? An international fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsqca). Earth Systems Governance Conference 2015, Canberra, Australia: ESG 2. Jeroen van der Heijden, Vanessa Rauland and Adriana Sanchez Gomez (forthcoming 2015) Synergies between and among traditional and innovative governance instruments for urban sustainability in Australia. Institute of Australian Geographers 2015 Conference Canberra, Australia: IAG. 3. Jeroen van der Heijden, Sara Wilkinson and Sarah Sayce (2015) Hybrid governance instruments for built environment sustainability and resilience: A comparative perspective., COBRA 2015, Sydney, Australia: COBRA. 4. Huiqi Yan, Jeroen van der Heijden and Benjamin van Rooij (2015) Simplifying Compliance Complexity: Using Crisp Set Comparative Qualitative Analysis (csqca) in Compliance Studies, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Networked Enforcement., New Directions in Effective Enforcement of EU Law, Cardiff, UK: Cardiff Law School invited paper, invitation from Dr Sara Drake and Dr Melanie Smith 6. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) What design condition affect the outcomes of voluntary environmental programs, and how? A fuzzy-set analysis of 35 cases from Australia, the Netherlands and the United States, European Consortium for Political Research General Conference 2014, Glasgow, UK: ECPR organiser/chair of a double panel on environmental governance 7. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Zooming in on regulatory intermediaries: The impact of nonstate regulators on sustainable construction practice., The Institutional Foundations of Capitalism, Chicago, USA: Northwestern University/University of Chicago 8. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) How to get grandpa moving? Understanding the potential of non-coercive governance in achieving urban sustainability., Access and Allocation in the Anthropocene, Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia/Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research 9. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Legal empowerment from the middle-out: Empowering the urban poor in India, Power, Regulation and Empowerment, Semarang, Indonesia: Diponegoro University/Leiden University invited paper, invitation from Prof Benjamin van Rooij 10. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Whatever happened to the State in the shift from government to governance? Unpacking 41 governance arrangements in Australia, India, the Netherlands, Singapore and the USA.. VSR Annual Meeting 2014, Dutch Socio-Legal Scholarship Association, Oegstgeest, the Netherlands: VSR invited paper, invitation from Prof Peter Machini 11. Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) The role of the State in new governance: reinventing government... again?, LSA2013 Annual Meeting. Boston, USA: LSA organiser/chair of a double panel on environmental governance 12. Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Clashing Validities in the Comparative Method? Balancing In- Depth Understanding and Generalizability in Small-N Policy Studies., Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No , General Subserie Research Paper No Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Experimental layering: paving the way for, or raising barriers to optimal policy mixes?, NUS 2013 Policy Design Workshop. Singapore: NUS invited paper, invitation from Prof Michael Howlett

9 Van der Heijden, 9 of Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Looking Forward and Sideways: Trajectories of New Governance Theory., Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No , General Subseries Research Paper No Jeroen van der Heijden (2012) Exploring the Emergence of Voluntary Environmental Governance Arrangements: Insights from the Australian Buildings Sector., 4th Biennial ECPR Standing Group for Regulatory Governance Conference. Exeter, UK: ECPR 16. Jeroen van der Heijden (2012) New Governance Arrangements in the Australian Buildings Sector: A Story of Limited Success., LSA2012 Annual Meeting. Honolulu, USA: LSA organiser/ chair of a panel on environmental governance 17. Jeroen van der Heijden and Ellen van Bueren (2011) European Sustainable Construction Regulation: Homogeneity and Attention., ANU Centre for European Studies Briefing Paper Series Canberra: ANUCES 18. Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Voluntary regulatory regimes in environmental governance: a review., LSA2011 Annual Meeting. San Francisco, USA: LSA organiser/chair of a panel on environmental governance 19. Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Privatised regulatory enforcement., European Consortium for Political Research General Conference Reykjavik, Iceland: ECPR organiser/chair of four panels on environmental governance (with Dr MartijnGroenleer) 20. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) A critique to Rothstein s Freedom of Choice Reasoning., Critical Governance Studies Conference. Warwick, UK: Warwick Business School 21. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Governing the eco-city utopia., NGI 2010 Conference on Next Generation Infrastructure for Eco-Cities Shenzen, China: Next Generation Infrastructures 22. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Some thoughts on a move towards a facilitating state., NIG 2010 Annual Work Conference. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Governance 23. Jeroen van der Heijden and Ellen van Bueren (2010) Studying sustainable construction initiatives from a public policy point of view., ERSCP-EMSU 2010 conference -Knowledge Collaboration & Learning for Sustainable Innovation. Delft, the Netherlands: ERSCP-EMSU 24. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) The legal framework wasn't built in one day. Layering, conversion, drift and displacement in the development of Dutch construction policy., LSA2010 annual meeting. Chicago: Law and Society Association 25. Jeroen van der Heijden (2010) Good enforcement/bad enforcement., Codes and the Built Environment Symposium. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester invited paper, invitation from Prof Rob Imrie 26. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) Aplicação dos regluamentos de construção,. (Building regulatory enforcement regimes), AdUrbum Lisboa, Portugal: AdUrbu invited paper, invitation from Dr Joao Branco Pedro 27. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) Hybridization of governance: the challenge of balancing policy outcomes., LSA2009 annual meeting. Denver: Law and Society Association 28. Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Building new regulatory regimes: Enforcing building regulations in Australia and Canada., (Re)Regulation in the Wake of Neoliberalism. Utrecht: the Standing Group on Regulatory Governance of the ECPR 29. Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Building control in Australia. Experiences with private sector involvement., COBRA Dublin: RICS 30. Jeroen van der Heijden (2007) Enforcement of building regulations: from public regulation to self-regulation; a theoretical approach., ENHR International Conference Rotterdam: ENHR/Onderzoeksinstitute OTB

10 Van der Heijden, 10 of Jeroen van der Heijden (2007) New enforcement strategies for Dutch municipal building control., AIBS conference. Adelaide: Australian Institute for Building Surveyors 32. Jeroen van der Heijden (2006) Enforcing Dutch building regulations: cutting or altering red tape?, ENHR conference 2006: Housing in an expanding Europe. Ljubljana: Urban Planning Institute 33. Jeroen van der Heijden, Henk Visscher and Frits Meijer (2006) Development of Dutch Building Control ( )., Shaping the Change; XXIII international FIG congress. Munich: FIG Office 34. Jeroen van der Heijden, Henk Visscher and Frits Meijer (2006) Shifting Responsibilities in Building Control in the Netherlands: a Historical Perspective., Proceedings of the Second International Congress on Construction History. Queens' College, Cambridge, UK: the Construction History Society, pp Invited lectures and keynotes 1. Invited lecture, Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsqca), Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 2 March Invited lecture, Comparative qualitative analysis: A socio-legal example, Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 26 February 2015 (video conference) 3. Invited Lecture, Climate Change and the City, College of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 17 February Invited lecture, Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience, RegNet, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 10 February Invited lecture, Good governance for urban sustainability and resilience, URBAN FUTURES Global Conference, United Nations, Graz, Austria 18 November Invited lecture, Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 4 November Invited lecture, Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience, LSE Cities, London School of Economics, London, UK 1 October Invited lecture, Ongedwongen Duurzaam (Voluntarily Sustainable), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, Netherlands 18 September Invited lecture, Innovations in environmental governance: Governing for a sustainable built environment, RegNet, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 26 November Invited lecture, Comparative qualitative analysis: A socio-legal example, Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 25 November 2013 (video conference) 11. Invited lecture, Regulatory Theory: From Australia to India and back again, Centre for Southeast Asian & Pacific Studies, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India 6 September Invited lecture, Governing Green Buildings and Green Cities: Environmental Challenges for India and Abroad, Centre for Southeast Asian & Pacific Studies, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India 4 September Invited lecture, Friends, Strangers or Enemies, Selected topics in Australian and U.S. Law Course, College of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 5 August Invited lecture, Governance for Sustainable City Development, Green Cities and Townships, Mumbai, India 26 April Invited lecture, Beyond the Built Environment: Achieving India s Sustainable Future, EcoBuild- India, Mumbai, India 16 April 2013

11 Van der Heijden, 11 of Invited lecture, Multidisciplinary research in a nutshell, College of Law, ECR Socio-Legal Workshop, Australian National University, Australia 15 February 2013 (with Veronica Taylor) 17. Invited lecture, Harvesting the low hanging fruit? New governance in the Dutch and Australian buildings sectors, ANUCES, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 6 November Keynote, Comparison of International Sustainability Solutions, Australian Institute for Building Surveyors, Melbourne, Australia 23 October Keynote, Ongedwongen Duurzaam Bouwen (Non-coerced sustainable development), Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands 3 October Keynote, Ongedwongen duurzaam (Non-coerced sustainability), Dutch Green Building Council/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 17 September Keynote, New Governance: yet another new regulatory paradigm? Guest lecture, University of Amsterdam/VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 10 September Invited lecture, Australian Sustainable Development: A Tale of Limited Success, RegNet, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 10 April Invited lecture, EU Lead Market Initiative for Sustainable Construction: Towards More Regulatory Homogeneity and Attention, ANU Centre for European Studies, Canberra, Australia - 27 September Invited lecture, Comparative policy analysis, RegNet PHD seminar, Canberra, Australia 1 August Invited lecture, Voluntary Regulatory Regimes in the Asia Pacific, ANU Asia Pacific Week 2011, Canberra, Australia 12 July Invited lecture, Voluntary Environmental Governance Arrangements, RegNet seminar series, Canberra, Australia 22 June Invited lecture, Toezicht op Toezicht (Enforcing enforcement), NSOB (Dutch School for Public Administration), the Hague, the Netherlands 24 November Invited lecture, Facilitative Governance and Sustainable Development, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom 17 November Invited lecture, Duurzaam Bouwen: een Holistische Visie (Sustainable Construction: a Holistic View), Project Management Bureau Amsterdam s Lecture Series, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 14 October Invited lecture, Good Enforcement/Bad Enforcement, Codes and the Built Environment Symposium, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 11 October Keynote, Aplicação dos regulamentos de construção (Enforcing building codes), AdUrbem 2009 Conference, Lisboa, Portugal 27 November Keynote, Bouwen onder Certificaat (Certified construction), VBWTN Symposium 2009, Dutch Building Officials Association (Vereniging Bouw en Woningtoezicht Nederland), Rotterdam, the Netherlands 26 November Invited lecture, Handhaving in de bouw (Enforcing construction), Symposium Handhaving en Gedrag (Enforcement and Behaviour), Dutch Ministry of Justice, Utrecht, the Netherlands 5 November Invited lecture, Privaat toezicht (Private sector enforcement), Symposium Toezicht in de Bouw (Enforcement in the buildings sector), Dutch Building Institute, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands 1 July Keynote, Is it all in the mix?, VIDE (Dutch umbrella organization for inspectorates), the Hague, the Netherlands 11 May 2009

12 Van der Heijden, 12 of Invited lecture, Private sector involvement in building regulatory enforcement, Building and Safety Policy Branch, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada 31 March Invited lecture, Private sector building control, Building Regulation Course, University of Technology Sydney, Centre for Local Government, Sydney, Australia 3 April 2007 Policy and practitioners journal papers 1. Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Greening the building sector: Surveyors as change agents., RICS Journal, 2014(May/June), Jeroen van der Heijden (2014) Greening the building sector: Much talk, little walk., RICS Journal, 2014(March/April), Jeroen van der Heijden (2013) Win-Win-Win? Promises of and limitations to voluntarily greening the building sector., Construction, Infrastructure, Architecture (Aug-Sep), Henk Vermande and Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Duurzaamheid in diverse Europese landen. Bouwregels in de praktijk (Dutch Building Code Journal), 7(6), Jeroen van der Heijden and Heleen Vreugdenhil (2011) Pilotprojecten: veilig inzicht krijgen in privaat bouwtoezicht (How pilot projects may help to improve building safety). Bouwregels in de praktijk (Dutch Building Code Journal), 7(5), Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Pas op dat Fundamentele Verkenning geen fundamentele vergissing wordt (review and critique to proposal to change Dutch Building Code Enforcement), Bouwregels in de praktijk (Dutch Building Code Journal), 3(10), Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Comparatively analyzing building regulation in the Netherlands, Australia and Canada., OBOA Journal, 78, Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Public vs. private. Competition in Australian statutory building assessment., The Australian Building Surveyor, 28(3), Jeroen van der Heijden (2008) Wat kunnen we leren van privaat bouwtoezicht in Australië? (What can the Netherlands learn from Australian building code enforcement?), Bouwregels in de praktijk (Dutch Building Code Journal), 3(1/2), Chapters in policy and practitioners books 1. Ernst ten Heuvelhof en Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Onderzoekscommissies en evaluatierapportages. Noord/Zuidlijn Amsterdam (On research committees and evaluation reports) in: City of Amsterdam Project Management Bureau (PMB), Achter de werkelijkheid van projecten (The reality of projects), Amsterdam: PMB, Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Duurzaamheid van de gebouwde omgeving. Positieve geluiden na enig pessimisme (Sustainability of the built environment. Some positive insights after much critique) in: City of Amsterdam Project Management Bureau (PMB), Achter de werkelijkheid van projecten (The reality of projects), Amsterdam: PMB., Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) Regels en gewoonten. Boodschap en werkelijkheid (Regulations and norms; Message and reality) in: City of Amsterdam Project Management Bureau (PMB), Achter de werkelijkheid van projecten (The reality of projects), Amsterdam: PMB, Policy reports 1. Henk Vermande and Jeroen van der Heijden (2011) The Lead Market Initiative and Sustainable Construction. Final report, Bodegraven/Delft: PRC/TU-Delft (client: European Committee). 2. Jeroen van der Heijden and Floris Bolkestein (2010) Gedelegeerd toezicht: bestuurskundige en juridische beschouwingen. (Delegated Enforcement), Delft: TBM/TU-Delft client: Province of Noord Brabant).

13 Van der Heijden, 13 of Ernst ten Heuvelhof, Jeroen van der Heijden, et. al. (2010) Evaluatie van het implementatieproces van de Kaderrichtlijn Water. (Evaluation Implementation Water Framework Directive), Delft: TBM/TU-Delft (client: Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management). 4. Wim Gielingh, Jeroen van der Heijden, et. al. (2010) Vertrouwen en Betrouwbaarheid - deel II. Een ontwerp voor de innovatie van het systeem van bouwtoezicht. (Innovative Approaches to Building Code Enforcement), Delft: Stichting Expertisecentrum Regelgeving Bouw. 5. Jeroen van der Heijden and Heleen Vreugdenhil (2009) Naar een vernieuwd systeem van bouwtoezicht. (Future of Dutch Building Control 2), Delft: TBM/TU-Delft (client: Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). 6. Jeroen van der Heijden and Hans de Bruijn (2009) De toekomst van het bouw- en woningtoezicht in Amsterdam. Een discussienotitie. (Future of Municipality of Amsterdam s Building Control Department), Delft: TBM/TU-Delft (client: Municipality of Amsterdam). 7. Jeroen van der Heijden (2009) Modellen voor een vernieuwd systeem van bouwtoezicht. (Future of Dutch Building Control 1), Delft: TBM/TU-Delft (client: Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). 8. Jeroen van der Heijden, Henk Visscher and Frits Meijer (2006) Bouwtoezicht bij veelvoorkomende bouwactiviteiten. (Building control in the Netherlands), The Hague: VROM (client: Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment). In the (popular) media 1. Opinion (2014) Making cities better: voluntary programs aren t enough, The Conversation US (19 December, 2. Opinion (2014) Urban sustainability: Australian cities leading the world for now, The Independent Australia (17 December, 3. Opinion (2014) Cities need innovative governance tools and brave politicians to combat climate change, The Fifth Estate (8 December, 4. Opinion (2014) Open Mumbai: How PK Das set out to map the city s slums, The Guardian (28 November, 5. Opinion (2014) Green Star not shining in the burbs, Timber+ DESIGN online (4 April, 6. Opinion (2014) Benchmarking building performance: What can we learn from LEED, The Fifth Estate (2 April, 7. Opinion (2014) Voluntary action for sustainable and resilient cities won t be enough, The Independent Australia (19 March, 8. Opinion (2014) Green building revolution? Only in high-end new CBD offices, The Conversation (19 March, Radio interview (2013) Towards truly resilient cities, Tuesday Daily, 2ser 107.3FM (12 December,

14 Van der Heijden, 14 of Opinion (2013) Towards truly resilient cities: Stop being soft on old buildings, The Conversation (6 December, Magazine interview (2012) Sustainable development: Breaking down the barriers, The Australian Building Surveyor 2012/13(Summer), (interview, Australian practitioner journal) 12. Radio interview (2012) The role of sustainable buildings, SBS Radio, (5 November 2012, radio interview, SBS Radio, Australia) 13. Magazine interview (2010) Expertdiscussie bouwtoezicht (Experts on building code enforcement). Bouwregels in de praktijk 13(3),6-8 (interview, Dutch practitioner journal) 14. Newspaper interview (2010) Certificering door particuliere bureaus vervangt overheidstoezicht op bedrijven (Private certification replaces governmental enforcement). Financieel Dagblad (7 August, interview, Dutch national newspaper) 15. Newspaper interview (2010) Bouwplantoets tussen wal en schip: (Building code enforcement between two stools). Cobouw (9 April, interview, Dutch national newspaper) 16. Magazine interview (2010) Systeemtoezicht kampt nog met aanloophobbel (Metaenforcement still falls short). PM (9 April, interview, Dutch policy journal) 17. Newspaper interview (2010) Volledige privatisering bouwtoezicht niet verstandig (Do not fully privatize building code enforcement). Cobouw (17 February, interview, Dutch newspaper) 18. Invited opinion (2009) Cijfers constructiefouten, kunnen we er iets mee? (What do the numbers tell us?). Cobouw, (18 August, invited opinion, Dutch national newspaper) 19. Invited opinion (2009) Weer een onnodige regel minder (Another unnecessary rule scrapped). Reformatorisch Dagblad (27 June, invited opinion, Dutch national newspaper) 20. Magazine interview (2009) Privatisering geen garantie voor bouwveiligheid (Privatized building code enforcement: no guarantee for safety). HandHaving 2 (25), (interview, Dutch policy journal) 21. Invited opinion (2009) Vooroordeel nekt beter bouwtoezicht (Prejudice kills better building control). Cobouw (9 March, invited opinion, Dutch national newspaper) 22. Invited opinion (2009) Privaat toezicht geen garantie veiligheid. Externe specialisten vooral nuttig voor kleine gemeenten (Private building control no guarantee for safety). Cobouw (23 February, invited opinion, Dutch national newspaper) 23. Magazine interview (2009) Privatisering biedt geen garantie voor de bouwveiligheid (Privatized building code enforcement: no guarantee for safety). Weekblad Facilitair & Gebouwbeheer 161(4), (interview, Dutch practitioner journal) 24. Magazine interview (2008) Promotieonderzoek handhaving en regelgeving: Laat private partijen complexe plannen toetsen (PhD project on private sector building code enforcement). Bouwregels in de praktijk, 11(3),6-8 (interview, Dutch practitioner journal) Social media Personal website Twitter Project website Blog RegSigns

15 Van der Heijden, 15 of 22 Short biography Dr Jeroen van der Heijden Dr Jeroen van der Heijden (1977) is Senior Research Fellow at the ANU s Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet), and Associate Professor at the University of Amsterdam s Law School. He received his PhD in Public Administration (highest honours) in 2009, and his MSc in Architecture (high distinction) in 2002, both from the Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. Since completing his PhD, he has undertaken roles in both teaching and research at the above mentioned universities as well as at the University of Washington, Department of Political Science (United States); the University of Oxford, Department of Politics and International Relations (United Kingdom); and the Sri Venkateswara University, Centre for Southeast Asian and Pacific Studies (India). Later in 2014, he will spend close to three months combined as a Visiting Associate at the London School of Economics, LSE Cities; and the University of East Anglia, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Studies (both United Kingdom). Jeroen works at the intersections of regulation and governance, policy change, and urban development and transformation. His research aims to improve local, national and international outcomes of urban governance on some of the most pressing challenges of our time: climate change, energy and water use, and a growing and increasingly urbanising world population. Through his work he seeks to inform ongoing academic debates on these challenges, as well as to provide hands-on lessons to policy makers and practitioners on how to govern urban sustainability and resilience on a day to day basis. In 2014, he was awarded one of the most prestigious Australian research awards for early career researchers for the period , being the Australian Research Council s DECRA (A$360,000). In 2011, he was awarded a highly competitive Dutch research awards for early career researchers for the period , being the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research VENI award ($350,000). He will commence his DECRA in In carrying out his VENI research project he has been studying over 60 voluntary programmes for increased urban sustainability and resilience in Australia, India, Malaysia, the Netherlands, the United States and Singapore. The research builds on interviews with over 200 key-stakeholders belonging to these voluntary programmes. Jeroen has a track record of outstanding publications. Since 2008, he has published 30+ articles in peer-reviewed journals, four academic books, a number of academic book chapters, and a wide range of publications for a policy and practitioner audience. He maintains an urban sustainability and resilience blog ( and a related website on which I regularly discusses my research findings ( His academic work has appeared in journals such as Regulation and Governance, Law and Policy, the Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, and Environmental Politics. His latest book appeared October 2014 with Edward Elgar Publishers: Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience. In addition, he is currently working on two other book manuscripts: Sustainable, Resilient and Carbon Neutral Australian Cities (prospective publisher: ANU Press) and Voluntary Programs for Green Buildings (prospective publishers: Cambridge University Press). Jeroen s work has been positively received by the academic and policy community. Since 2009 citations to his work have been steadily rising (current h-index is 9; current i10-index is 9). His

16 Van der Heijden, 16 of 22 publications have resulted in a range of invitations to speak at policy and practitioner conferences, including an invitation from the United Nations to present as one of 120 selected international experts on urban sustainability and resilience at the Urban Futures Conference in Graz, Austria, in November He enjoys teaching, and consider this an important aspect of being an academic. At Delft University of Technology he has taught and coordinated a series of under-graduate and graduate courses in public administration and political science, with a particular focus on regulation, governance and policy. At ANU, he developed the flagship RegNet course, Law and Regulation (LAWS8034), as part of the ANU College of Law LLM programme. Jeroen has taught and convened this course three times to date, to consistently strong positive feedback from participating Masters and PhD students. In October 2014 his sustained and proven education track record was recognised by the UK based Higher Education Academy (HEA), and Dr Van der Heijden is now a Fellow of the HEA. Jeroen is currently supervisor to six PhD students. In his current and past positions Dr Van der Heijden has been an active member of staff. Among others, he has been a member of the RegNet Governance Group and the RegNet Education Committee. He has served on numerous appointments committees within RegNet, as well as the ANU College of Asia and Pacific (within which RegNet is situated), and he has willingly taken on the role of Acting Centre Director when senior colleagues were absent. He is also the inaugural editor of the electronic RegNet Research Paper journal (distributed through SSRN the Social Science Research Network), and is currently working with Professor Drahos and Professor Veronica Taylor on a RegNet e-textbook on regulation that brings together a series of chapters by close to 40 leading regulatory scholars in the field. Dr Jeroen van der Heijden is a citizen of the Netherlands, but has been living happily in Australia for over four years now. He enjoys exploring the Australian bush, has taken up a keen interest in photographing Australia s big skies and gum-trees during the golden hours, and he still feels lucky by the prospect of all the adventures to be had on this astonishing continent.

17 Van der Heijden, 17 of 22 Philosophy of teaching and learning Dr Jeroen van der Heijden Over the years, I have been fortunate to have been lectured, supervised and mentored by and have been working together with inspiring teachers. My role models have shown me that class size or level should not be a constraining factor to create an environment to critically engage with knowledge. They have strongly influenced me in my approach to teaching: I seek to catch my students interest by linking theories, concepts and knowledge to contemporary situations, to my own experiences and those of my students. I try, as much as possible, to put knowledge into context so that its relevance becomes apparent. I like to think of myself as a scholar-teacher; someone who facilitates learning and who learns with his students, rather than someone who delivers information. At Delft University of Technology (TUD) and the Australian National University (ANU), I have taught five socio-legal courses at both undergraduate and graduate levels for multiple years (since 2009; see further my CV). I have fully developed one of these (LAWS8034, Law and Regulation) at the ANU and have been very active in the ongoing development of the courses I taught at TUD. As course convenor for two courses I have worked with a team of educators. In addition, at the Dutch NCOI University of Applied Sciences I have been developing the Master of Environmental Sciences since In developing, convening, and teaching courses I am conscious of students different learning styles and differences in learning opportunities. I do so by relating theoretical concepts to videoclips, newspaper or other articles in the popular media, by inviting practitioners or policymakers to present their real-world experiences about a theoretical concept that is topic of a class, or by role playing games or other creative activities. I believe that this balance of visual, auditory and kinaesthetic serves a variety of students and is effective in engaging students with the courses that I teach. In teaching socio-legal scholarship, public administration and political science I seek to emphasise the value of critical scholarship. As future professionals, academics or public servants my students need not only understand the present state of law and society, but also how they would like it to be and how they may contribute to that normative state of affairs. This requires ongoing engagement with academic and policy debates by the students, but also an ability to clearly and logically express their ideas and arguments. I seek to support my students in learning how they can most effectively communicate their ideas through various in-class oral presentations, small-group discussions, and collaborative and individually written essays. Again this suite of communication strategies seeks to serve various learning styles, and may help students to understand what strategy suits them best and what strategies they wish to modify. In classes I aim to be flexible and responsive in order to create a learning environment that suits my particular class or audience. To give an example, in one of my classes (SPM2210, at Delft University of Technology, see CV) my students found it difficult to understand the difference between Crozier and Lipsky s theorizing on street level bureaucrats. To explain the difference I played a very strict and formal Crozier-style teacher in the first half of a class, and a very supportive and informal Lipskystyle teacher in the second half of the class. The students preferred the Lipsky-style teacher, but realised they would learn more from a Crozier-style one. In conclusion, I valuate and enjoy teaching. It provides me with a context in which I can help people to shape their worldviews, whilst they help me to rethink and shape my own.

18 Van der Heijden, 18 of 22 Selected peer and student evaluations ( ) Dr. Jeroen van der Heijden Feedback from the assessors of my successful application for a Fellowship with the Higher Education Academy, October 2014 Areas of Activity: o You [Jeroen van der Heijden] are clearly experienced in all five areas of activity and consciously looking to improve. Your ideas of things to try in your next classes sound like they may well have positive benefits. Hopefully you will be able to measure the effects of these experiments quantitatively. Core Knowledge: o You have demonstrated all aspects of core knowledge related to teaching and learning, including appropriate teaching methods in your discipline. You have also demonstrated successful engagement in professional development related to teaching, learning and assessment. o I am particularly pleased to see how effectively and broadly you have managed to integrate many of these inspirational and instructive experiences into your teaching. I appreciate your desire to improve, and I am fully satisfied that you are firmly engaged with professional development activities to achieve that goal. Professional Values: o You have demonstrated your commitment to all Professional Values. Your commitment to scholarship, your discipline and your students is evident. Student evaluations Law and Regulation Course, LAWS8034, College of Law, Australian National University, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Please note, this is a four day intensive Course (26 contact hours in four days over the course of two weeks). The Course s main means of assessment is a research essay, which makes up 90 per cent of the overall mark. The Course is part of the ANU College of Law LLM program. I have developed this Course in 2012 and have been teaching and convening it since. In 2014, students evaluated their learning experience with a 4.5 out of 5.0 in the official ANU student evaluation (SELT). Some qualitative insights from 2014 s students are: o Question 1: Overall, how well does Jeroen teach? Good - Despite covering a lot of material, his teaching style allowed for a good base-level understanding of theory and strategy. Number of guest lectures did limit the amount of traditional teaching time however, but don't view this is a negative given the intensive nature of contact hours. Overall his teaching skills were excellent and he was engaging with the class. From the use of visual aids to the group discussions the course content was delivered very well. He also made it clear that he was contactable outside of class for any assistance that was required outside of the class set times. Jeroen is an excellent teacher; he is well prepared; the material he provides to students is logical and well set out; he has an easy to understand style and responds well to the questions of students. Very well. I found his lectures to be very informative and entertaining. Fantastic. I appreciate his engaging style, success in conveying a great deal of information in a digestible form, good use of materials (usually use of power points is abysmal but not here!), inviting relevant guest speakers and engaging the class in discussion.

19 Van der Heijden, 19 of 22 o o o Question 2: What works well in Jeroen's teaching? Structure of the course was its major strength - regulation literature was not particularly easy to digest, so breaking up content through guest lectures and role playing discussions worked well. However, see comments at Q3. Also, excellent power points [note: I use the presentation program Prezi, not Power Point] and real life scenarios through media clips was a good way to see practical application of discussed materials He uses visual aids that are relevant to establish the foundation of the theory he is going to teach. This then establishes the practical concept that then enforces the theory that is explained. He all uses examples that apply for both private and public sector workers to enforce the theories that he is teaching. I found that coming from a non-legal background based in the private sector that the examples used were excellent at enforcing the key points. His responsiveness to students questions and ability to listen and provide an informative response as well as give guidance to open up learning in new and unthought of areas. The powerpoint presentation that Jeroen used was really great - the right amount of information. I also enjoyed the videos he presented - they broke up the more theoretical aspects of the course really well. An excellent balance between delivery of the material we need to know with opportunities for questions and discussions. Also good to link class discussions back to the materials, so it helped to understanding that and wasn't just student observations. Good selection of course readings. Question 3: What does not work well in Jeroen's teaching? I wouldn't have minded a bit more thematic allocation of guest presentations, so there was a direct flow through from the literature presented in the morning, to a guest lecture, to interactive practice. Afternoons that were dedicated towards reg[ulatory] theory in practice (Veronica Taylor's presentation and the role play) with robust class interaction was more useful than the longer guest lectures. Due to the fact that PhD students were in with Masters students, at certain points during the classes the implied knowledge on Regulation theories appeared to be higher of all the students than it possibly was. Sometimes responding to all students questions did delay the class and we did not cover all material in same detail. However, I do not think this is a negative as sometimes more time was required for some material than others. It depends on the students at the time. I thought Jeroen's course was focussed a little too much on teaching the ResNet [sic] students. It was still interesting but I guess I expected a little more of a legal focus as it was marketed to me in this way. I also expected an hour for lunch which might seem excessive but given how tired everyone was after lunch it might have been useful to get energy levels up. [no comments] Question 4: What would you advise Jeroen to change or improve in his teaching? Some more group work may have been useful to learn more from each other, in lieu of the online forum discussion. The feedback around opportunity for improvement is to attempt to keep in mind the varying basis knowledge of the student group has with regards to Regulation theories. Due to the fact that PhD students were in with Masters students, at certain points during the classes the implied knowledge on Regulation theories appeared to be higher of all the students than it may have been.

20 Van der Heijden, 20 of 22 Arrange for regular breaks for students during sessions as it is hard to concentrate for long periods of time without a break. I benefit a lot from small group exercises as I am often too shy and intimidated to speak out in front of a larger group. I think more of this kind of learning would have been an improvement for me but understand that for the majority of the class the open, large group discussions were useful. I really had to rack my brain to think of anything. I would have liked to hear more about your own research. Perhaps a greater use of practical examples over literature as a way into the subject, purely just to make things a little different over 4 big days. o Question 5: Do you have any comments about Jeroen in the role of Course Convenor? No further comments - an excellent and interesting course. Overall an excellent Course Convenor. I think he would be an excellent convenor and students would learn a lot from his courses. Jeroen seems to be very well organised and provided timely advice on all aspects of the course. I feel that I am well aware of what is expected of me and that feedback will be provided to me in a timely and comprehensive manner. Really appreciated having the materials provided online, accessible for questions during class and over , very clear about assessment expectations and outcomes. In 2013, students evaluated their learning experience with a 4.3 out of 5.0, well above the 3.8 College average for the semester in which I taught the Course. Some snippets from s from my students give some indication of how students experienced the Course: o Nicholas Neil, 3 April 2013: Thank you for an enjoyable and informative intensive workshop last week in Canberra. I found the course material particularly useful and interesting in my work context. o Blaine Jonathan, 31 March 2013: Hope your are able to have a few days of recovery before having to jump into more work. I have to say I found the class extremely stimulating and came away with all sorts of thoughts about potential studies and scholarship, so for me it was a really productive trip. No ANU student evaluation is available for the year 2012, which was first year I convened and taught this Course. Though the following snippets from s from my students give some indication of how students experienced the Course: o Scott Rollason, 23 October 2012: Firstly thank you very much for the seminars, I really enjoyed the way they were run and the diversity of topics. Took a lot out of it and already incorporating some of the thinking into the work I do. o Lauren Mateer, 20 October 2012: Thanks for an excellent course Jeroen. Stand out subject of this degree, well done.

21 Van der Heijden, 21 of 22 Peer evaluations Law and Regulation Course, LAWS8034, College of Law, Australian National University 2014 Miss Kate Ogg, Lecturer at the ANU College of Law, participated in the Course as part of her PhD research project. She has kindly evaluated the Course in an on 4 July 2014: o Thanks again for a really interesting course and I hope you have recovered from what would have been a very intensive period of teaching, preparation and marking. I liked the first day of the course the best the one in which we focussed on high level theory. However, I completely acknowledge that as an academic I am naturally more drawn to theory while some of the other students with a public service background would be more interested in application. I would perhaps suggest some heavier theory as well exploring where ideas adopted by regulatory theory could be related back to classic theorists (Durkheim, Foucault, Bentham etc). Shane Chalmers did this very well in his presentation. However, I acknowledge that I may be a bit of an anomaly in this respect. I really liked the fact that you invited both PhD students as well as established researchers and this is an idea that I hope to take up in the intensive course I will be teaching later in the year. I felt that the benefit of the PhD students is that they demonstrated, very clearly, the process of academic research (what is the problem, why is it important, what are my methods etc). I note that you specifically asked them to do this which worked really well because it is something that well established researchers are less transparent about perhaps because these things have become second nature to them. I enjoyed the range of guest lecturers and in particular what I appreciated is that there was a mix of people with commercial research interests as well as speakers who have more of a social justice/human rights focus. I would have liked more of the readings to have a social justice/human rights focus I felt that most of them had a business/commercial bent. The videos in class and the subsequent discussions were a very necessary tool for keeping us engaged during what were very intense days. On a practical level, I found sitting through 2 consecutive 2 hour days very difficult. I would have preferred to do Thursdays and Saturdays for example. It may also be a good idea to have a week off during the two sessions this would help with reading and digestion. I m sure you will get a lot of comments about this but the lunch breaks were too short. Of course, it is better to finish at 5 rather than 6pm but perhaps some sessions could be shortened just a little to allow a 45 minute break which is necessary when you have to eat and attend to and matters arising in your day job. Peer and PhD student evaluation of the training I provided for his guest lecture in the Law and Regulation Course, LAWS8034, College of Law, Australian National University, 2014 PhD students play an active role in the Law and Regulation Course. It is part of their training and they have to take the Course in their first year. In addition, I ask volunteers from our PhD cohort (those in their third or fourth year) to provide a short 45 minutes guest lecture. I support these PhD students in developing their lecture, and evaluate and discuss their lecture afterwards. Some snippets from their s may give some insight in how they experience this process:

22 Van der Heijden, 22 of 22 o Dr Ibolya Losoncz, 30 June 2014: Thank you so much for giving me feedback and sharing your thoughts and suggestions. I really do appreciate it. I often wonder after my presentations what the audience got out of it, and found your suggestion really useful, especially in terms of how I can create better participation and engagement from my audience. Thanks heaps and thanks for the opportunity for the guest lecture. o Shane Chalmers, 30 June 2014: I echo Seung's thanks, and really appreciate your reflections on how to strengthen future lectures, as well as your words of encouragement. And of course many thanks for giving us the space in your course to do this. For me at least it was a valuable learning opportunity. PhD student evaluation Drafts R Us writing and review group, RegNet, Australian National University, Within RegNet I have launched a writing and review group for PhD students and early career academics, and I have been convening this group since In it we discuss each other s draft academic output (i.e., papers, articles, book chapters, books). Dr Robyn Holder was an active participant from 2011 to 2013, when she was working on her own PhD project. She has kindly evaluated the writing and review group in an on 16 June 2014: o I got a huge amount from drafts r' us. It was a terrific opportunity to hear how ECRs and fellow PhDs 'read' the structure, language and argument of an article/chapter. People saw different things and even this was helpful as it showed there was no one way to read one's work, or to present an argument. Obviously having others (clever, interested, sympathetic) do a reading of one's work in a reasonable amount of depth is like gold because no-one else will do it! It was best done before one was 'ironed onto' the text. If you submitted too late then you were too protective of your work and maybe couldn't see wood for trees. And the feedback and comment is just that. You still have the choice - is it relevant, or useful - to adopt or just to notice, think about and put aside. People won't necessarily comment on the detail of an argument but their comments tell you if your main point is coming across, or if something else is more interesting, or that this and this bit is confusing, or that something else is solid and clear. All of which is fabulous. Practicing doing this in a supportive crowd was terrific. And, to me, it is part of ethical scholarship that if one gets a good deed from others, then you return it! I didn't go to every one but tried to. Even when I knew nothing about someone's content it was always enormously useful listening to others' comments, and I found I could usually say something coherent. In terms of improvements I think the hour was good and people could stay back if needed. I think a coordinator is also useful. You, Kate and Natasha all provided really good feedback so having that quality early was a great model. I am not sure how it would work without that. In terms of encouraging others, you might want to think how it could be worked as part of each PhD cohort. That is, could it be used as a model for communal scholarship, and new PhDs are just told that it is expected. Then a cohort might eventually become self-managing while you (or someone) turned to the next cohort.