arxiv:submit/ [q-fin.pr] 3 Jun 2016

Transcription

1 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve exension of he Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier arxiv:submi/ [q-fin.pr] 3 Jun 206 Absrac he recen financial crisis has led o so-called muli-curve models for he erm srucure. Here we sudy a muli-curve exension of shor rae models where, in addiion o he shor rae iself, we inroduce shor rae spreads. In paricular, we consider a Gaussian facor model where he shor rae and he spreads are second order polynomials of Gaussian facor processes. his leads o an exponenially quadraic model class ha is less well known han he exponenially affine class. In he laer class he facors ener linearly and for posiiviy one considers square roo facor processes. While he square roo facors in he affine class have more involved disribuions, in he quadraic class he facors remain Gaussian and his leads o various advanages, in paricular for derivaive pricing. Afer some preliminaries on maringale modeling in he muli-curve seup, we concenrae on pricing of linear and opional derivaives. For linear derivaives, we exhibi an adjusmen facor ha allows one o pass from pre-crisis single curve values o he corresponding pos-crisis muli-curve values. Zorana Grbac Laboraoire de Probabiliés e Modèles Aléaoires, Universié Paris Didero - Paris 7, France grbac@mah.univ-paris-didero.fr Laura Meneghello Diparimeno di Maemaica Pura ed Applicaa, Universià di Padova, Via riese 63, I-352- Padova Presen affiliaion: Gruppo Banco Popolare Disclaimer: he views, houghs and opinions expressed in his paper are hose of he auhors in heir individual capaciy and should no be aribued o Gruppo Banco Popolare or o he auhors as represenaives or employees of Gruppo Banco Popolare meneghello.laura@yahoo.com Wolfgang J. Runggaldier Diparimeno di Maemaica Pura ed Applicaa, Universià di Padova, Via riese 63, I-352- Padova runggal@mah.unipd.i

2 2 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier Keywords : muli-curve models, shor rae models, shor rae spreads, Gaussian exponenially quadraic models, pricing of linear and opional ineres rae derivaives, Riccai equaions, adjusmen facors. Inroducion he recen financial crisis has heavily impaced he financial marke and he fixed income markes in paricular. Key feaures pu forward by he crisis are counerpary and liquidiy/funding risk. In ineres rae derivaives he underlying raes are ypically Libor/Euribor. hese are deermined by a panel of banks and hus reflec various risks in he inerbank marke, in paricular counerpary and liquidiy risk. he sandard no-arbirage relaions beween Libor raes of differen mauriies have broken down and significan spreads have been observed beween Libor raes of differen enors, as well as beween Libor and OIS swap raes, where OIS sands for Overnigh Indexed Swap. For more deails on his issue see equaions (5-(7 and he paragraph following hem, as well as he paper by Bormei e al. (205 and a corresponding version in his volume. his has led praciioners and academics alike o consruc muli-curve models where fuure cash flows are generaed hrough curves associaed o he underlying raes (ypically he Libor, one for each enor srucure, bu are discouned by anoher curve. For he pre-crisis single-curve seup various ineres rae models have been proposed. Some of he sandard model classes are: he shor rae models; he insananeous forward rae models in an Heah-Jarrow-Moron (HJM seup; he marke forward rae models (Libor marke models. In his paper we consider a possible muli-curve exension of he shor rae model class ha, wih respec o he oher model classes, has in paricular he advanage of leading more easily o a Markovian srucure. Oher muli-curve exensions of shor rae models have appeared in he lieraure such as Kijima e al. (2009, Kenyon (200, Filipović and rolle (203 and Morino and Runggaldier (204. he presen paper considers an exponenially quadraic model, whereas he models in he menioned papers concern mainly he exponenially affine framework, excep for Kijima e al. (2009 in which he exponenially quadraic models are menioned. More deails on he difference beween he exponenially affine and exponenially quadraic shor rae models will be provided below. Inspired by a credi risk analogy, bu also by a common pracice of deriving muli-curve quaniies by adding a spread over he corresponding single-curve riskfree quaniies, we shall consider, nex o he shor rae iself, a shor rae spread o be added o he shor rae, one for each possible enor srucure. Noice ha hese spreads are added from he ouse. o discuss he basic ideas in an as simple as possible way, we consider jus a wo-curve model, namely wih one curve for discouning and one for generaing fuure cash flows; in oher words, we shall consider a single enor srucure. We shall hus concenrae on he shor rae r and a single shor rae spread s and,

3 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 3 for heir dynamics, inroduce a facor model. In he pre-crisis single-curve seing here are wo basic facor model classes for he shor rae: he exponenially affine and he exponenially quadraic model classes. Here we shall concenrae on he less common quadraic class wih Gaussian facors. In he exponenially affine class where, o guaranee posiiviy of raes and spreads, one considers generally square roo models for he facors, he disribuion of he facors is χ 2. In he exponenially quadraic class he facors have a more convenien Gaussian disribuion. he paper is srucured as follows. In he preliminary secion 2 we mainly discuss issues relaed o maringale modeling. In secion 3 we inroduce he muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic model class. In secion 4 we deal wih pricing of linear ineres rae derivaives and, finally, in secion 5 wih nonlinear/opional ineres rae derivaives. 2 Preliminaries 2. Discoun curve and collaeralizaion. In he presence of muliple curves, he choice of he curve for discouning he fuure cash flows, and a relaed choice of he numeraire for he sandard maringale measure used for pricing, in oher words, he quesion of absence of arbirage, becomes non-rivial (see e.g. he discussion in Kijima and Muromachi (205. o avoid issues of arbirage, one should possibly have a common discoun curve o be applied o all fuure cash flows independenly of he enor. A choice, which has been widely acceped and became pracically sandard, is given by he OIS-curve p(,= p OIS (, ha can be sripped from OIS raes, namely he fair raes in an OIS. he argumens jusifying his choice and which are ypically evoked in pracice, are he fac ha he majoriy of he raded ineres rae derivaives are nowadays being collaeralized and he rae used for remuneraion of he collaeral is exacly he overnigh rae, which is he rae he OIS are based on. Moreover, he overnigh rae bears very lile risk due o is shor mauriy and herefore can be considered relaively risk-free. In his conex we also poin ou ha prices, corresponding o fully collaeralized ransacions, are considered as clean prices (his erminology was firs inroduced by Crépey (205 and Crépey e al. (204. Since collaeralizaion is by now applied in he majoriy of cases, one may hus ignore counerpary and liquidiy risk beween individual paries when pricing ineres rae derivaives, bu canno ignore he counerpary and liquidiy risk in he inerbank marke as a whole. hese risks are ofen joinly referred o as inerbank risk and hey are main drivers of he muli-curve phenomenon, as documened in he lieraure (see e.g. Crépey and Douady (203, Filipović and rolle (203 and Gallischke e al. (204. We shall hus consider only clean valuaion formulas, which ake ino accoun he muli-curve issue. Possible ways o accoun for counerpary risk and funding issues beween individual counerparies in a conrac are, among ohers, o

4 4 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier follow a global valuaion approach ha leads o nonlinear derivaive valuaion (see Brigo e al. (202, Brigo e al. (203 and oher references herein, and in paricular Pallavicini and Brigo (203 for a global valuaion approach applied specifically o ineres rae modeling, or o consider various valuaion adjusmens ha are generally compued on op of he clean prices (see Crépey (205. A fully nonlinear valuaion is preferable, bu is more difficul o achieve. On he oher hand, valuaion adjusmens are more consolidaed and also used in pracice and his gives a furher jusificaion o sill look for clean prices. Concerning he explici role of collaeral in he pricing of ineres rae derivaives, we refer o he above-menioned paper by Pallavicini and Brigo ( Maringale measures he fundamenal heorem of asse pricing links he economic principle of absence of arbirage wih he noion of a maringale measure. As i is well known, his is a measure, under which he raded asse prices, expressed in unis of a same numeraire, are local maringales. Models for ineres rae markes are ypically incomplee so ha absence of arbirage admis many maringale measures. A common approach in ineres rae modeling is o perform maringale modeling, namely o model he quaniies of ineres direcly under a generic maringale measure; one has hen o perform a calibraion in order o single ou he specific maringale measure of ineres. he modeling under a maringale measure now imposes some condiions on he model and, in ineres rae heory, a ypical such condiion is he Heah-Jarrow- Moron (HJM drif condiion. Saring from he OIS bonds, we shall firs derive a suiable numeraire and hen consider as maringale measure a measure Q under which no only he OIS bonds, bu also he FRA conracs seen as basic quaniies in he bond marke, are local maringales when expressed in unis of he given numeraire. o his basic marke one can hen add various derivaives imposing ha heir prices, expressed in unis of he numeraire, are local maringales under Q. Having made he choice of he OIS curve p(, as he discoun curve, consider he insananeous forward raes f(, := log p(, and le r = f(, be he corresponding shor rae a he generic ime. Define he OIS bank accoun as ( B = exp r s ds ( and, as usual, he sandard maringale measure Q as he measure, equivalen o he physical measure P, ha is associaed o he bank accoun B as numeraire. Hence he arbirage-free prices of all asses, discouned by B, have o be local maringales wih respec o Q. For derivaive pricing, among hem also FRA pricing, i is ofen more convenien o use, equivalenly, he forward measure Q associaed o he OIS bond p(, as numeraire. he wo measures Q and Q are relaed by heir Radon- Nikodym densiy process 0

5 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 5 d Q = p(, d Q F B p(0, 0. (2 As already menioned, we shall follow he radiional maringale modeling, whereby he model dynamics are assigned under he maringale measure Q. his leads o defining he OIS bond prices according o [ ] } p(,=e {exp Q r u du F (3 afer having specified he Q dynamics of r. Coming now o he FRA conracs, recall ha hey concern a forward rae agreemen, esablished a a ime for a fuure inerval [, + ], where a ime + he ineres corresponding o a floaing rae is received in exchange for he ineres corresponding o a fixed rae R. here exis various possible convenions concerning he iming of he paymens. Here we choose paymen in arrears, which in his case means a ime +. ypically, he floaing rae is given by he Libor rae and, having assumed paymens in arrears, we also assume ha he rae is fixed a he beginning of he inerval of ineres, here a. Recall ha for exposiory simpliciy we had reduced ourselves o a wo-curve seup involving jus a single Libor for a given enor. he floaing rae received a + is herefore he rae L( ;,+, fixed a he incepion ime. For a uniary noional, and using he(+ forward measure Q + as he pricing measure, he arbirage-free price a of he FRA conrac is hen P FRA (;, +,R= p(, + E + {L( ;, + R F }, (4 where E + denoes he expecaion wih respec o he measure Q +. From his expression i follows ha he value of he fixed rae R ha makes he conrac fair a ime is given by R = E + {L( ;, + F } := L(;, + (5 and we shall call L(;, + he forward Libor rae. Noe ha L( ;, + is a Q + maringale by consrucion. In view of developing a model for L( ;, +, recall ha, by absence of arbirage argumens, he classical discree compounding forward rae a ime for he fuure ime inerval[, + ] is given by F(;, + = ( p(, p(, +, where p(, represens here he price of a risk-free zero coupon bond. his expression can be jusified also by he fac ha i represens he fair fixed rae in a forward rae agreemen, where he floaing rae received a + is

6 6 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier F( ;, + = ( p(, + (6 and we have F(;, + =E + {F( ;, + F }. (7 his makes he forward rae coheren wih he risk-free bond prices, where he laer represen he expecaion of he marke concerning he fuure value of money. Before he financial crisis, L( ;,+ was assumed o be equal o F( ;,+, an assumpion ha allowed for various simplificaions in he deerminaion of derivaive prices. Afer he crisis L( ;,+ is no longer equal o F( ;,+ and wha one considers for F( ;,+ is in fac he OIS discreely compounded rae, which is based on he OIS bonds, even hough he OIS bonds are no necessarily equal o he risk-free bonds (see secions.3. and.3.2 of Grbac and Runggaldier (205 for more deails on his issue. In paricular, he Libor rae L( ;, + canno be expressed by he righ hand side of (6. he fac ha L( ;, + F( ;, + implies by (5 and (7 ha also L(;, + F(;, + for all and his leads o a Libor-OIS spread L(;, + F(;, +. Following some of he recen lieraure (see e.g. Kijima e al. (2009, Crépey e al. (202, Filipović and rolle (203, one possibiliy is now o keep he classical relaionship (6 also for L( ;, + hereby replacing however he bonds p(, by ficiious risky ones p(, ha are assumed o be affeced by he same facors as he Libor raes. Such a bond can be seen as an average bond issued by a represenaive bank from he Libor group and i is herefore someimes referred o in he lieraure as a Libor bond. his leads o L( ;, + = ( p(, +. (8 Recall ha, for simpliciy of exposiion, we consider a single Libor for a single enor and so also a single ficiious bond. In general, one has one Libor and one ficiious bond for each enor, i.e. L ( ;, + and p (, +. Noe ha we shall model he bond prices p(,, for all and wih, even hough only he prices p(, +, for all, are needed in relaion (8. Moreover, keeping in mind ha he bonds p(, are ficiious, hey do no have o saisfy he boundary condiion p(, =, bu we sill assume his condiion in order o simplify he modeling. o derive a dynamic model for L(;, +, we may now derive a dynamic model for p(, +, where we have o keep in mind ha he laer is no a raded quaniy. Inspired by a credi-risk analogy, bu also by a common pracice of deriving muli-curve quaniies by adding a spread over he corresponding single-curve (riskfree quaniies, which in his case is he shor rae r, le us define hen he Libor (risky bond prices as [ ] p(,=e {exp Q (r u + s u du F }, (9

7 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 7 wih s represening he shor rae spread. In case of defaul risk alone, s corresponds o he hazard rae/defaul inensiy, bu here i corresponds more generally o all he facors affecing he Libor rae, namely besides credi risk, also liquidiy risk ec. Noice also ha he spread is inroduced here from he ouse. Having for simpliciy considered a single enor and hus a single p(,, we shall also consider only a single spread s. In general, however, one has a spread s for each enor. We need now a dynamical model for boh r and s and we shall define his model direcly under he maringale measure Q (maringale modeling. 3 Shor rae model 3. he model As menioned, we shall consider a dynamical model for r and he single spread s under he maringale measure Q ha, in pracice, has o be calibraed o he marke. For his purpose we shall consider a facor model wih several facors driving r and s. he wo basic facor model classes for he shor rae in he pre-crisis singlecurve seup, namely he exponenially affine and he exponenially quadraic model classes, boh allow for flexibiliy and analyical racabiliy and his in urn allows for closed or semi-closed formulas for linear and opional ineres rae derivaives. he former class is usually beer known han he laer, bu he laer has is own advanages. In fac, for he exponenially affine class one would consider r and s as given by a linear combinaion of he facors and so, in order o obain posiiviy, one has o consider a square roo model for he facors. On he oher hand, in he Gaussian exponenially quadraic class, one considers mean revering Gaussian facor models, bu a leas some of he facors in he linear combinaion for r and s appear as a square. In his way he disribuion of he facors remains always Gaussian; in a square-roo model i is a non-cenral χ 2 disribuion. Noice also ha he exponenially quadraic models can be seen as dual o he square roo exponenially affine models. In he pre-crisis single-curve seing, he exponenially quadraic models have been considered e.g. in El Karoui e al. (992, Pelsser (997, Gombani and Runggaldier (200, Leippold and Wu (2002, Chen e al. (2004, and Gaspar (2004. However, since he pre-crisis exponenially affine models are more common, here have also been more aemps o exend hem o a pos-crisis muli-curve seing (for an overview and deails see e.g. Grbac and Runggaldier (205. A firs exension of exponenially quadraic models o a muli-curve seing can be found in Kijima e al. (2009 and he presen paper is devoed o a possibly full exension. Le us now presen he model for r and s, where we consider no only he shor rae r iself, bu also is spread s o be given by a linear combinaion of he facors, where a leas some of he facors appear as a square. o keep he presenaion

8 8 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier simple, we shall consider a small number of facors and, in order o model also a possible correlaion beween r and s, he minimal number of facors is hree. I also follows from some of he economeric lieraure ha a small number of facors may suffice o adequaely model mos siuaions (see also Duffee (999 and Duffie and Gârleanu (200. Given hree independen affine facor processes Ψ i, i =,2,3, having under Q he Gaussian dynamics dψ i = b i Ψ i d+ σ i dw i, i=,2,3, (0 wih b i,σ i > 0 and w i, i=,2,3, independen Q Wiener processes, we le { r = Ψ +(Ψ 2 2 s = κψ +(Ψ 3 2, ( where Ψ is he common sysemaic facor allowing for insananeous correlaion beween r and s wih correlaion inensiy κ and Ψ 2 and Ψ 3 are he idiosyncraic facors. Oher facors may be added o drive s, bu he minimal model conaining common and idiosyncraic componens requires hree facors, as explained above. he common facor is paricularly imporan because we wan o ake ino accoun he realisic feaure of non-zero correlaion beween r and s in he model. Remark 3. he zero mean-reversion level is here considered only for convenience of simpler formulas, bu can be easily aken o be posiive, so ha shor raes and spreads can become negaive only wih small probabiliy (see Kijima and Muromachi (205 for an alernaive represenaion of he spreads in erms of Gaussian facors ha guaranees he spreads o remain nonnegaive and sill allows for correlaion beween r and s. Noe, however, ha given he curren marke siuaion where he observed ineres raes are very close o zero and someimes also negaive, even models wih negaive mean-reversion level have been considered, as well as models allowing for regime-swiching in he mean reversion parameer. Remark 3.2 For he shor rae iself one could also consider he model r = φ + Ψ +(Ψ 2 2 where φ is a deerminisic shif exension (see Brigo and Mercurio (2006 ha allows for a good fi o he iniial erm srucure in shor rae models even wih consan model parameers. In he model ( we have included a linear erm Ψ which may lead o negaive values of raes and spreads, alhough only wih small probabiliy in he case of models of he ype (0 wih a posiive mean reversion level. he advanage of including his linear erm is more generaliy and flexibiliy in he model. Moreover, i allows o express p(, in erms of p(, muliplied by a facor. his propery will lead o an adjusmen facor by which one can express pos-crisis quaniies in erms of corresponding pre-crisis quaniies, see Morino and Runggaldier (204 in which his idea has been firsly proposed in he conex of exponenially affine shor rae models for muliple curves.

9 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model Bond prices (OIS and Libor bonds In his subsecion we derive explici pricing formulas for he OIS bonds p(, as defined in (3 and he ficiious Libor bonds p(, as defined in (9. hereby, r and s are supposed o be given by ( wih he facor processes Ψ i evolving under he sandard maringale measure Q according o (0. Defining he marices b 0 0 σ 0 0 F = 0 b 2 0, D= 0 σ 2 0 (2 0 0 b σ 3 and considering he vecor facor process Ψ := [Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3 ] as well as he mulivariae Wiener process W := [w,w2,w3 ], where denoes ransposiion, he dynamics (0 can be rewrien in synheic form as dψ = FΨ d+ DdW. (3 Using resuls on exponenial quadraic erm srucures (see Gombani and Runggaldier (200, Filipović (2002, we have p(,=e Q{ } e r u du F = E Q{ } e (Ψu +(Ψu 2 2 du F [ ] = exp A(, B (,Ψ Ψ C(,Ψ (4 and, seing R := r + s, p(,=e Q{ } e R u du F [ = exp Ā(, B (,Ψ Ψ = E Q{ e ((+κψ u +(Ψ 2 u 2 +(Ψ 3 u 2 du F } C(,Ψ ], (5 where A(,, Ā(,, B(,, B(,, C(, and C(, are scalar, vecor and marix-valued deerminisic funcions o be deermined. For his purpose we recall he Heah-Jarrow-Moron (HJM approach for he case when p(, in (4 represens he price of a risk-free zero coupon bond. he HJM approach leads o he so-called HJM drif condiions ha impose condiions on he coefficiens in (4 so ha he resuling prices p(, do no imply arbirage possibiliies. Since he risk-free bonds are raded, he no-arbirage condiion is expressed by requiring p(, B o be a Q maringale for B defined as in ( and i is exacly his maringaliy propery o yield he drif condiion. In our case, p(, is he price of an OIS bond ha is no necessarily raded and in general does no coincide wih he price of a risk-free bond. However, wheher he OIS bond is raded or no, p(, B is a Q maringale by he very definiion of p(, in (4 (see he firs equaliy in (4 and so we can follow he same HJM approach o obain condiions on he coefficiens in (4 also in our case.

10 0 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier p(, B For wha concerns, on he oher hand, he coefficiens in (5, recall ha p(, is a ficiious asse ha is no raded and hus is no subjec o any no-arbirage condiion. Noice, however, ha by analogy o p(, in (4, by is very definiion given in he firs equaliy in (5, is a Q maringale for B given by B := exp 0 R udu. he wo cases p(, and p(, can hus be reaed in complee analogy provided ha we use for p(, he numeraire B. We shall nex derive from he Q maringaliy of p(, B and p(, condiions on B he coefficiens in (4 and (5 ha correspond o he classical HJM drif condiion and lead hus o ODEs for hese coefficiens. For his purpose we shall proceed by analogy o secion 2 in Gombani and Runggaldier (200, in paricular o he proof of Proposiion 2. herein, o which we also refer for more deail. Inroducing he insananeous forward raes f(, := log p(, and f(, := log p(,, and seing a(, := A(,, b(, := B(,, c(, := C(, (6 and analogously for ā(,, b(,, c(,, from (4 and (5 we obain f(,=a(,+b (,Ψ +Ψ c(,ψ, (7 f(,=ā(,+ b (,Ψ +Ψ c(,ψ. (8 Recalling ha r = f(, and R = f(,, his implies, wih a( := a(,,b( := b(,, c( := c(, and analogously for he corresponding quaniies wih a bar, ha r = a(+b (Ψ +Ψ c(ψ (9 and R = r + s = ā(+ b (Ψ +Ψ c(ψ. (20 Comparing (9 and (20 wih (, we obain he following condiions where i, j =, 2, 3, namely a(=0 ā(=0 b i (= {i=} c i j (= {i= j=2} b i (=(+κ {i=} c i j (= {i= j=2} {i= j=3}. Using nex he fac ha p(,=exp [ ] f(,sds and imposing p(, B and p(, B [, p(,=exp ] f(,sds, o be Q maringales, one obains ordinary differenial equaions o be saisfied by c(,,b(,,a(, and analogously for he quaniies wih a bar. Inegraing hese ODEs wih respec o he second variable

11 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model and recalling (6 one obains (for he deails see he proof of Proposiion 2. in Gombani and Runggaldier (200 { C (,+2FC(, 2C(,DDC(,+c(= 0, C(,=0 (2 C (,+2F C(, 2 C(,DD C(,+ c(=0, C(,=0 wih c(= c( = ( he special forms of F, D, c( and c( ogeher wih boundary condiionsc(,= 0 and C(,=0 imply ha only C 22, C 22, C 33 are non-zero and saisfy C 22 (, 2b 2 C 22 (, 2(σ 2 2 (C 22 (, 2 + =0, C 22 (,=0 C 22 (, 2b 2 C 22 (, 2(σ 2 2 ( C 22 (, 2 + =0, C 22 (,=0 (23 C 33 (, 2b 3 C 33 (, 2(σ 3 2 ( C 33 (, 2 + =0, C 33 (,=0 ha can be shown o have as soluion C 22 (,= C 22 (,= C 33 (,= 2(e ( h2 2h 2 +(2b 2 +h 2 (e ( h2 2(e ( h3 2h 3 +(2b 3 +h 3 (e ( h3 (24 wih h i = 4(b i 2 + 8(σ i 2 > 0, i=2,3. Nex, always by analogy o he proof of Proposiion 2. in Gombani and Runggaldier (200, he vecors of coefficiens B(, and B(, of he firs order erms can be seen o saisfy he following sysem { B (,+B(,F 2B(,DDC(,+b(= 0, B(,=0 (25 B (,+ B(,F 2 B(,DD C(,+ b(=0, B(,=0 wih b(=[,0,0] b(=[(+κ,0,0]. Noicing similarly as above ha only B (,, B (, are non-zero, sysem (25 becomes { B(, b B (,+=0 B (,=0 B (, b B (,+(+κ= 0 B (26 (,=0 leading o he explici soluion B (,= ( e b b ( ( B (,= +κ e b b ( =(+κb (,. (27

12 2 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier Finally, A(, and Ā(, have o saisfy { A (,+(σ 2 2 C 22 (, 2 (σ 2 (B (, 2 = 0, Ā (,+(σ 2 2 C 22 (,+(σ 3 2 C 33 (, 2 (σ 2 ( B (, 2 = 0 (28 wih boundary condiions A(,=0,Ā(,=0. he explici expressions can be obained simply by inegraing he above equaions. Summarizing, we have proved he following Proposiion 3. Assume ha he OIS shor rae r and he spread s are given by ( wih he facor processes Ψ i, i =,2,3, evolving according o (0 under he sandard maringale measure Q. he ime- price of he OIS bond p(,, as defined in (3, is given by p(,=exp[ A(, B (,Ψ C 22 (,(Ψ 2 2 ], (29 and he ime- price of he ficiious Libor bond p(,, as defined in (9, by p(,=exp[ Ā(, (κ+ B (,Ψ C 22 (,(Ψ 2 2 C 33 (,(Ψ 3 2 ] = p(,exp[ Ã(, κb (,Ψ C 33 (,(Ψ 3 2 ], where Ã(, := Ā(, A(, wih A(, and Ā(, given by (28, B (, given by (27 and C 22 (, and C 33 (, given by (24. In paricular, expression (30 gives p(, in erms of p(,. Based on his we shall derive in he following secion he announced adjusmen facor allowing o pass from pre-crisis quaniies o he corresponding pos-crisis quaniies. ( Forward measure he underlying facor model was defined in (0 under he sandard maringale measure Q. For derivaive prices, which we shall deermine in he following wo secions, i will be convenien o work under forward measures, for which, given he single enor, we shall consider a generic ( + -forward measure. he densiy process o change he measure from Q o Q + is L := d Q+ d Q = F p(, + p(0, + B (3 from which i follows by (29 and he maringale propery of ( p(,+ B + ha

13 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 3 ( dl = L B (, + σ dw 2C22 (, + Ψ 2 σ 2 dw 2. his implies by Girsanov s heorem ha dw,+ = dw + σ B (, + d dw 2,+ = dw 2+ 2C22 (, + Ψ 2 σ 2 d dw 3,+ = dw 3 (32 are Q + Wiener processes. From he Q dynamics (0 we hen obain he following Q + dynamics for he facors dψ = [ b Ψ +(σ 2 B (, + ] d+ σ dw,+ dψ 2 = [ b 2 Ψ 2 + 2(σ 2 2 C 22 (, + Ψ 2 dψ 3 = b 3 Ψ 3 d+ σ 3 dw 3,+. ] d+ σ 2 dw 2,+ (33 Remark 3.3 While in he dynamics (0 for Ψ i, (i =,2,3 under Q we had for simpliciy assumed a zero mean-reversion level, under he ( + -forward measure he mean-reversion level is for Ψ now differen from zero due o he measure ransformaion. Lemma 3. Analogously o he case when p(, represens he price of a risk-free p(, zero coupon bond, also for p(, viewed as OIS bond we have ha p(,+ is a Q + maringale. Proof. We have seen ha also for OIS bonds as defined in (3 we have ha, wih B as in (, he raio p(, B is a Q maringale. From Bayes formula we hen have { E + { p(, p(,+ F }= EQ { p(, = EQ p(,+ EQ{ B + F } p(,+ B } p(, p(,+ F p(0,+ B { + } E Q p(0,+ B F + F } { } = B E Q p(, B F p(,+ = p(, p(,+, { } = B E Q p(, p(,+ p(,+ B F p(,+ hus proving he saemen of he lemma. We recall ha we denoe he expecaion wih respec o he measure Q + by E + { }. he dynamics in (33 lead o Gaussian disribuions forψ i, i=,2,3 ha, given B ( and C 22 (, have mean and variance E + {Ψ i }=ᾱi = ᾱi (bi,σ i, Var + {Ψ i which can be explicily compued. More precisely, we have }= β i = β i (bi,σ i,

14 4 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier [ ] ᾱ = e b Ψ0 (σ 2 e 2(b 2 b (+ ( e 2b (σ 2 ( e b (b 2 β = e 2b (e 2b (σ 2 2(b wih ᾱ 2 β 2 ᾱ 3 = e (b2 +2(σ 2 2 C 22 (,+ Ψ0 2 = e (2b2 +4(σ 2 2 C 22 (,+ 0 e2b2 s+4(σ 2 2 C 22 (s,+ (σ 2 2 ds = e b3 Ψ0 3 β 3 = e 2b3 (σ 3 2 (e 2b3, 2b 3 C 22 (, + = 2(2log(2b2 (e (+ h2 +h 2 (e (+ h2 + + (2b 2 + h 2 (2b 2 + h 2 (2b 2 h 2 2(2log(2b2 (e (+ h2 +h 2 (e (+ h2 + (2b 2 + h 2 (2b 2 h 2 and h 2 = (2b (σ 2 2, and where we have assumed deerminisic iniial values Ψ0,Ψ 0 2 and Ψ 0 3. For deails of he above compuaion see he proof of Corollary in Meneghello (204. (34 (35 4 Pricing of linear ineres rae derivaives We have discussed in subsecion 3.2 he pricing of OIS and Libor bonds in he Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model inroduced in subsecion 3.. In he remaining par of he paper we shall be concerned wih he pricing of ineres rae derivaives, namely wih derivaives having he Libor rae as underlying rae. In he presen secion we shall deal wih he basic linear derivaives, namely FRAs and ineres rae swaps, while nonlinear derivaives will hen be deal wih in he following secion 5. For he FRA raes discussed in he nex subsecion 4. we shall in sub-subsecion 4.. exhibi an adjusmen facor allowing o pass from he singlecurve FRA rae o he muli-curve FRA rae. 4. FRAs We sar by recalling he definiion of a sandard forward rae agreemen. We emphasize ha we use a ex-book definiion which differs slighly from a marke definiion, see Mercurio (200. Definiion 4. Given he ime poins 0 < +, a forward rae agreemen (FRA is an OC derivaive ha allows he holder o lock in a he generic dae he ineres rae beween he incepion dae and he mauriy + a a

15 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 5 fixed value R. A mauriy + a paymen based on he ineres rae R, applied o a noional amoun of N, is made and he one based on he relevan floaing rae (generally he spo Libor rae L( ;, + is received. Recalling ha for he Libor rae we had posulaed he relaion (8 o hold a he incepion ime, namely L( ;, + = ( p(, +, he price, a, of he FRA wih fixed rae R and noional N can be compued under he( + forward measure as P FRA (;, +,R,N = N p(, + E + {L( ;, + R F } = N p(, + E + { } p(,+ (+ R F, (36 Defining ν, := E + { } p(, + F, (37 i is easily seen from (36 ha he fair rae of he FRA, namely he FRA rae, is given by In he single-curve case we have insead R = ( ν,. (38 R = (ν,, (39 p(, where, given ha p(,+ is a Q+ maringale (see Lemma 3., { } ν, := E + p(, + F = p(, p(, +, (40 which is he classical expression for he FRA rae in he single-curve case. Noice ha, conrary o (37, he expression in (40 can be explicily compued on he basis of bond price daa wihou requiring an ineres rae model. 4.. Adjusmen facor We shall show here he following Proposiion 4. We have he relaionship

16 6 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier ν, = ν, Ad, Res, (4 wih { { Ad, := E Q p(,+ p(,+ F }=E Q exp[ã(, + ] } +κb (, + Ψ + (42 C 33 (, + (Ψ 32 F and Res, = exp [ κ (σ 2 ( ( 2(b 3 e b e b 2 ] (, (43 where Ã(, is defined afer (30, B (, in (27 and C 33 (, in (24. Proof. Firsly, from (30 we obain p(, + p(, + = eã(,+ +κb (,+ Ψ + C 33 (,+ (Ψ 3 2. (44 In (37 we now change back from he ( + forward measure o he sandard maringale measure using he densiy process L given in (3. Using furhermore he above expression for he raio of he OIS and he Libor bond prices and aking ino accoun he definiion of he shor rae r in erms of he facor processes, we obain { { } ν, = E + F }=L E Q L F = = = p(, + { ( exp p(, + } p(, + r u du F p(, + p(, + EQ p(, + exp[ã(, + ]EQ{ e C 33 (,+ (Ψ 3 } 2 F E Q{ e (Ψ u +(Ψ 2 u 2 du e κb (,+ Ψ } F p(, + exp[ã(, + ]EQ{ e C 33 (,+ (Ψ 3 } 2 F E Q{ e Ψ u du e κb (,+ Ψ } F E Q{ e (Ψ 2 u 2 du F }, where we have used he independence of he facors Ψ i, i=,2,3 under Q. Recall now from he heory of affine processes (see e.g. Lemma 2. in Grbac and Runggaldier (205 ha, for a process Ψ saisfying (0, we have for all δ, K R [ ] } E {exp Q δψu du KΨ F = exp[α (, β (,Ψ ], (46 (45 where { β (, = Ke b ( δ α (, = (σ 2 2 b ( (β (u, 2 du. e b (

17 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 7 Seing ( K = κ B (, + and δ =, and recalling from (27 ha B (, = e b b (, his leads o { E Q e } Ψu du e κb (,+ Ψ F [ (σ = exp 2 2 (κb (, + 2 e 2b ( u du κb (, + (σ 2 B (u,e b ( u du+ (σ 2 ( + κb (, + e b ( B (, Ψ ]. 2 (B (u, 2 du (47 On he oher hand, from he resuls of secion 3.2 we also have ha, for a process Ψ 2 saisfying (0, [ ] } E {exp Q (Ψu 2 2 du F = exp [ α 2 (, C 22 (,(Ψ 2 2], where C 22 (, corresponds o (24 and (see (28 his implies ha α 2 (,=(σ 2 2 C 22 (u,du. [ ] } (Ψu 2 2 du F E {exp Q [ = exp (σ 2 2 C 22 (u,du C 22 (, ( Ψ 2 2 ]. (48 Replacing (47 and (48 ino (45, and recalling he expression for p(, in (29 wih A(,B (,C 22 ( according o (28, (27 and (24 respecively, we obain [ ν, = p(, p(,+ eã(,+ E Q e C ] 33 (,+ (Ψ 32 F [ exp (σ 2 ] 2 (κb (, + 2 e 2b ( u du+κb (, + e b ( Ψ ] exp [ κb (, + (σ 2 B (u,e b ( u du. (49 We recall he expression (44 for p(,+ p(,+ and he fac ha, according o (46, we have } E {e Q κb (,+ Ψ F = exp [ (σ 2 2 (κb (, + 2 ] e 2b ( u du+κb (, + e b ( Ψ.

18 8 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier Insering hese expressions ino (49 we obain he resul, namely { ν, = p(, p(,+ } p(,+ EQ p(,+ F ] exp [ κb (, + (σ 2 B (u,e b ( u du { = p(, p(,+ } p(,+ EQ F p(,+ [ ( ] exp κ (e b (σ 2 ( e b 2(b 2 2b ( ( e (b 2 b (, (50 where we have also used he fac ha B (u,e b ( u ( du= b = e b ( u e b ( u du ( e 2(b 2 2b ( + (b 2 ( e b ( Remark 4. he adjusmen facor Ad, allows for some inuiive inerpreaions. Here we menion only he easies one for he case when κ = 0 (independence of r and s. In his case we have r + s > r implying ha p(, + < p(, + so ha Ad,. Furhermore, always for κ = 0, he residual facor has value Res, =. All his in urn implies ν, ν, and wih i R R, which is wha one would expec o be he case. Remark 4.2 (Calibraion o he iniial erm srucure. he parameers in he model (0 for he facors Ψ i and hus also in he model ( for he shor rae r and he spread s are he coefficiens b i and σ i for i=,2,3. From (4 noice ha, for i =, 2, hese coefficiens ener he expressions for he OIS bond prices p(, ha can be assumed o be observable since hey can be boosrapped from he marke quoes for he OIS swap raes. We may hus assume ha hese coefficiens, i.e. b i and σ i for i =,2, can be calibraed as in he pre-crisis single-curve shor rae models. I remains o calibrae b 3, σ 3 and, possibly he correlaion coefficien κ. Via (5 hey affec he prices of he ficiious Libor bonds p(, ha are, however, no observable. One may observe hough he FRA raes R and R and hus also ν,, as well as ν,. Via (4 his would hen allow one o calibrae also he remaining parameers. his ask would urn ou o be even simpler if one would have access o he value of κ by oher means. We emphasize ha in order o ensure a good fi o he iniial bond erm srucure, a deerminisic shif exension of he model or ime-dependen coefficiens b i could be considered. We recall also ha we have assumed he mean-reversion level equal o zero for simpliciy; in pracice i would be one more coefficien o be calibraed for each facor Ψ i..

19 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model Ineres rae swaps We firs recall he noion of a (payer ineres rae swap. Given a collecion of daes 0 0 < < < n wih γ γ k := k k (k=,,n, as well as a noional amoun N, a payer swap is a financial conrac, where a sream of ineres paymens on he noional N is made a a fixed rae R in exchange for receiving an analogous sream corresponding o he Libor rae. Among he various possible convenions concerning he fixing for he Libor and he paymen daes, we choose here he one where, for each inerval[ k, k ], he Libor raes are fixed in advance and he paymens are made in arrears. he swap is hus iniiaed a 0 and he firs paymen is made a. A receiver swap is compleely symmeric wih he ineres a he fixed rae being received; here we concenrae on payer swaps. he arbirage-free price of he swap, evaluaed a 0, is given by he following expression where, analogously o E + { }, we denoe by E k{ } he expecaion wih respec o he forward measure Q k (k=,,n P Sw (; 0, n,r = γ = γ n k= n k= p(, k E k {L( k ; k, k R F } p(, k (L(; k, k R. (5 For easier noaion we have assumed he noional o be, i.e. N =. We shall nex obain an explici expression for P Sw (; 0, n,r saring from he firs equaliy in (5. o his effec, recalling from (24 ha C 22 (, = C 22 (,, inroduce again some shorhand noaion, namely A k := Ā( k, k,b k := B ( k, k, C 22 k := C 22 ( k, k = C 22 ( k, k, C 33 k := C 33 ( k, k. he crucial quaniy o be compued in (5 is he following one { E k {γl( k ; k, k F }=E } k p( k, k F = e A k E k {exp((κ+ B k Ψ k +C 22 k (Ψ 2 k 2 + C 33 k (Ψ 3 k 2 F }, (52 (53 where we have used he firs relaion on he righ in (30. he expecaions in (53 have o be compued under he measures Q k, under which, by analogy o (33, he facors have he dynamics dψ = [ b Ψ dψ 2 = [ b 2 Ψ 2 +(σ 2 B (, k ] d+ σ dw,k + 2(σ 2 2 C 22 (, k Ψ 2 dψ 3 = b 3 Ψ 3 d+ σ 3 dw 3,k. ] d+ σ 2 dw 2,k (54 where w i,k, i =,2,3, are independen Wiener processes wih respec o Q k. A sraighforward generalizaion of (46 o he case where he facor process Ψ sais-

20 20 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier fies he following affine Hull-Whie model dψ =(a ( b Ψ d+ σ dw can be obained as follows [ ] } E {exp Q δψu du KΨ F = exp[α (, β (,Ψ ], (55 wih β (, = Ke b ( (e δ b b ( α (, = (σ 2 2 (β (u, 2 du a (uβ (u,du. We apply his resul o our siuaion where under Q k he process Ψ saisfies he firs SDE in (54 and hus corresponds o he above dynamics wih a ( = (σ 2 B (, k. Furhermore, seing K = (κ + B k and δ = 0, we obain for he firs expecaion in he second line of (53 (56 E k {exp((κ+ B kψ k F }=exp[γ (, k ρ (, k Ψ ], (57 wih ρ (, k = (κ+ B k e b ( k Γ (, k = (σ 2 k ( 2 ρ (u, k 2 k du+(σ 2 B (u, k ρ (u, k du. For he remaining wo expecaions in he second line of (53 we shall use he following Lemma 4. Le a generic process Ψ saisfy he dynamics (58 dψ = b(ψ d+ σ dw (59 wih w a Wiener process. hen, for all C R such ha E Q{ exp [ C(Ψ 2]} <, we have E Q{ exp [ C(Ψ 2] F } = exp [ Γ(, ρ(,(ψ 2] (60 wih ρ(, and Γ(, saisfying { ρ (,+2b(ρ(, 2(σ 2 (ρ(, 2 = 0 ; ρ(,= C Γ (,=(σ 2 ρ(,. Proof. An applicaion of Iô s formula yields ha he nonnegaive process Φ := (Ψ 2 saisfies he following SDE dφ = ( (σ 2 + 2b(Φ d+ 2σ Φ dw. We recall ha a process Φ given in general form by (6

21 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 2 dφ =(a+λ(φ d+ η Φ dw, wih a,η > 0 and λ( a deerminisic funcion, is a CIR process. hus, (Ψ 2 is equivalen in disribuion o a CIR process wih coefficiens given by λ(=2b(, η = 2σ, a=(σ 2. From he heory of affine erm srucure models (see e.g. Lamberon and Lapeyre (2007, or Lemma 2.2 in Grbac and Runggaldier (205 i now follows ha E Q{ exp [ C(Ψ 2] F } = E Q {exp[c Φ ] F }=exp[γ(, ρ(,φ ] = exp [ Γ(, ρ(,(ψ 2] wih ρ(, and Γ(, saisfying (6. Corollary 4. When b( is consan wih respec o ime, i.e. b( b, so ha also λ( λ, hen he equaions for ρ(, and Γ(, in (6 admi an explici soluion given by ρ(,= 4bhe2b( 4(σ 2 he 2b( Γ(,= (σ 2 ρ(u,du. wih h := C 4(σ 2 C+4b Coming now o he second expecaion in he second line of (53 and using he second equaion in (54, we se b( := [ b 2 + 2(σ 2 2 C 22 (, k ], σ := σ 2, C= C 22 k and apply Lemma 4., provided ha he parameers b 2 and σ 2 of he process Ψ 2 are such ha C= Ck 22 saisfies he assumpion from he lemma. We hus obain (62 E k {exp(c 22 k (Ψ 2 k 2 F }=exp[γ 2 (, k ρ 2 (, k (Ψ 2 2 ], (63 wih ρ 2 (,,Γ 2 (, saisfying ρ 2 (, 2 [ b 2 + 2(σ 2 2 C 22 (, k ] ρ 2 (, 2(σ 2 2 (ρ 2 (, 2 = 0 ρ 2 ( k, k = Ck 22 Γ 2 (,= (σ 2 2 ρ 2 (u,du. (64 Finally, for he hird expecaion in he second line of (53, we may ake advanage of he fac ha he dynamics of Ψ 3 do no change when passing from he measure Q o he forward measure Q k. We can hen apply Lemma 4., his ime wih (see he hird equaion in (54 b( := b 3, σ := σ 3, C= C 33 k

22 22 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier and ensuring ha he parameers b 3 and σ 3 of he process Ψ 3 are such ha C= C 33 k saisfies he assumpion from he lemma. Since b( is consan wih respec o ime, also Corollary 4. applies and we obain E k {exp( C 33 k (Ψ 3 k 2 F }=exp[γ 3 (, k ρ 3 (, k (Ψ 3 2 ], where ρ 3 (, k = 4b3 h 3 k e 2b3 ( k wih h 3 4(σ 3 2 h 3 k e 2b3 ( k k = C k 33 4(σ 3 k Γ 3 (, k = (σ 3 2 ρ 3 (u, k du. 2 C 33 k 4b3 (65 Wih he use of he explici expressions for he expecaions in (53, and aking also ino accoun he expression for p(, in (29, i follows immediaely ha he arbirage-free swap price in (5 can be expressed according o he following Proposiion 4.2 he price of a payer ineres rae swap a 0 is given by P Sw (; 0, n,r=γ = = where n k= n k= n k= p(, k E k {L( k ; k, k R F } ( p(, k D,k e ρ (, k Ψ ρ 2 (, k (Ψ 2 2 ρ 3 (, k (Ψ 3 2 (Rγ+ (D,k e A,k e B,k Ψ C 22,k (Ψ 2 2 C 33,k (Ψ 3 2 (Rγ+ e A,k e B,k Ψ C 22,k (Ψ 2 A,k := A(, k, B,k := B (, k, C,k 22 := C22 (, k B,k := B,k + ρ (, k, C,k 22 := C22,k + ρ2 (, k, C,k 33 := ρ3 (, k D,k := e A kexp[γ (, k + Γ 2 (, k + Γ 3 (, k ], 2, wih ρ i (, k, Γ i (, k (i=,2,3 deermined according o (58, (64 and (65 respecively and wih A k as in (52. (66 (67 5 Nonlinear/opional ineres rae derivaives In his secion we consider he main nonlinear ineres rae derivaives wih he Libor rae as underlying. hey are also called opional derivaives since hey have he form of an opion. In subsecion 5. we shall consider he case of caps and, symmerically, ha of floors. In he subsequen subsecion 5.2 we shall hen concenrae on swapions as opions on a payer swap of he ype discussed in subsecion 4.2.

23 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model Caps and floors Since floors can be reaed in a compleely symmeric way o he caps simply by inerchanging he roles of he fixed rae and he Libor rae, we shall concenrae here on caps. Furhermore, o keep he presenaion simple, we consider here jus a single caple for he ime inerval [, + ] and for a fixed rae R (recall also ha we consider jus one enor. he payoff of he caple a ime + is hus (L( ;, + R +, assuming he noional N =, and is ime- price P Cpl (; +,R is given by he following risk-neural pricing formula under he forward measure Q + P Cpl (; +,R= p(, + E + { (L( ;, + R + F }. In view of deriving pricing formulas, recall from subsecion 3.3 ha, under he ( + forward measure, a ime he facors Ψ i have independen Gaussian disribuions (see (34 wih mean and variance given, for i =, 2, 3, by E + {Ψ i }=ᾱi = ᾱi (bi,σ i, Var + {Ψ i i }= β = β i (bi,σ i. In he formulas below we shall consider he join probabiliy densiy funcion of (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3 under he + forward measure, namely, using he independence of he processes Ψ i,(i=,2,3, f (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3 (x,x 2,x 3 = 3 f Ψ i i= (x i= 3 i= N (x i,ᾱ i, β i, (68 and use he shorhand noaion f i ( for f Ψ i( in he sequel. We shall also wrie Ā,B,C 22, C 33 for he corresponding funcions evaluaed a (, + and given in (28, (27 and (24 respecively. Seing R := + R, and recalling he firs equaliy in (30, he ime-0 price of he caple can be expressed as P Cpl (0; +,R= p(0, + E + { (L( ;, + R +} { ( } + = p(0, + E + p(,+ R { ( } + = p(0, + E + eā+(κ+b Ψ +C22 (Ψ 22 + C 33 (Ψ 32 R R3 ( = p(0, + eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 + R f (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3 (x,y,zd(x,y,z. (69

24 24 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier o proceed, we exend o he muli-curve conex an idea suggesed in Jamshidian (989 (where i is applied o he pricing of coupon bonds by considering he funcion g(x,y,z := exp[ā+(κ+ B x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 ]. (70 Noicing ha C 33 (, + > 0 (see (24 ogeher wih he fac ha h 3 > 0 and 2b 3 + h 3 > 0, for fixed x,y he funcion g(x,y,z can be seen o be coninuous and increasing for z 0 and decreasing for z<0 wih lim z ± g(x,y,z =+. I will now be convenien o inroduce some objecs according o he following Definiion 5. Le a se M R 2 be given by M :={(x,y R 2 g(x,y,0 R} (7 and le M c be is complemen. Furhermore, for(x,y M le z = z (x,y, z 2 = z 2 (x,y be he soluions of g(x,y,z= R. hey saisfy z 0 z 2. Noice ha, for z z 0 and z z 2 0, we have g(x,y,z g(x,y, z k = R, and for z ( z, z 2, we have g(x,y,z< R. In M c we have g(x,y,z g(x,y,0> R and hus no soluion of he equaion g(x, y, z = R. In view of he main resul of his subsecion, given in Proposiion 5. below, we prove as a preliminary he following Lemma 5. Assuming ha he (non-negaive coefficiens b 3,σ 3 in he dynamics (0 of he facor Ψ 3 saisfy he condiion b 3 σ 3 2, (72 we have ha 2 β 3 C 33 > 0, where C 33 = C 33 (,+ is given by (24 and where β 3 = (σ 3 2 2b 3 ( e 2b3 according o (34. Proof. From he definiions of β 3 and C 33 we may wrie ( 2 β 3 C 33 = ( e 2 e h3 2b3 2 b3 h 3 + b3 (2b (σ 3 2 (σ h 3 (. (73 e 2 h3 Noice nex ha b 3 > 0 implies ha e 2b3 (0, and ha b 3 h 3 (σ From (73 i hen follows ha a sufficien condiion for 2 β 3 C 33 > 0 o hold is ha 2 b3 (σ 3 2 (2b3 + h 3. (74

25 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 25 Given ha, see definiion afer (24, h 3 = 2 (b (σ 3 2 2b 3, he condiion (74 is saisfied under our assumpion (72. Proposiion 5. Under assumpion (72 we have ha he ime-0 price of he caple for he ime inerval[, + ] and wih fixed rae R is given by [ P Cpl (0; +,R= p(0, + eā+(κ+b x+c 22 (y 2 M [γ(ᾱ 3, β 3, C 33 ( Φ(d (x,y+φ( d 2 (x,y ] e C 33 ( z (x,y 2 Φ(d 3 (x,y+e C 33 ( z 2 (x,y 2 Φ( d 4 (x,y f (x f 2 (ydxdy +γ(ᾱ 3, β 3, C 33 M c eā+(κ+b x+c 22 (y 2 f (x f 2 (ydxdy RQ + { (Ψ,Ψ 2 Mc}], (75 where Φ( is he cumulaive sandard Gaussian disribuion funcion, M and M c are as in Definiion 5., d 2 β 3 (x,y := C 33 z (x,y (ᾱ 3 θ β 3 β 3 d 2 (x,y := d 3 (x,y := z (x,y ᾱ 3 β 3 2 β 3 C 33 z 2 (x,y (ᾱ 3 θ β 3 β 3 (76 wih θ := ᾱ3 d 4 (x,y := z2 (x,y ᾱ 3 ( / 2 β 3 C 33 β 3 β 3, which by Lemma 5. is well defined under he given assumpion (72, and wih γ(ᾱ 3, β 3, C 33 := e( 2 (θ2 β 3 ᾱ3 θ 2 β 3 C 33. Remark 5. Noice ha, once he se M and is complemen M c from Definiion 5. are made explici, he inegrals, as well as he probabiliy in (75, can be compued explicily. Proof. On he basis of he ses M and M c we can coninue (69 as

26 26 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier R3 ( P Cpl (0; +,R= p(0, + eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 + R f (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3 (x,y,zd(x,y,z ( = p(0, + eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 + R M R f (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3(x,y,zd(x,y,z ( +p(0, + M c eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 + R R f (Ψ,Ψ 2,Ψ 3(x,y,zd(x,y,z (77 =: P (0; + +P 2 (0; +. We shall nex compue separaely he wo erms in he las equaliy in (77 disinguishing beween wo cases according o wheher(x,y M or(x,y M c. Case i: For (x,y M we have from Definiion 5. ha here exis z (x,y 0 and z 2 (x,y 0 so ha for z [ z, z 2 ] we have g(x,y,z g(x,y, z k = R. For P (0;+ we now obain P (0; + = p(0, + ( z eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 (x,y (e C 33 z 2 e C 33 ( z 2 f 3 (zdz M + + z 2 (x,y (e C 33 z 2 e C 33 ( z 2 2 f 3 (zdz f 2 (y f (xdydx. (78 Nex, using he resuls of subsecion 3.3 concerning he Gaussian disribuion f 3 ( = f Ψ 3(, we obain he calculaions in (79 below, where, recalling Lemma 5., we make successively he following changes of variables: ζ := 2 β 3 C 33 z, θ := ᾱ3 ( / 2 β 3 C 33 β 3, s := ζ (ᾱ3 θ β 3 β 3 and where d i (x,y, i=,,4 are as defined in (76

27 Derivaive pricing for a muli-curve Gaussian, exponenially quadraic shor rae model 27 z (x,y z (x,y = z e C 33 z 2 (x,y f 3 (zdz= 2π β 3 2 β 3 C 33 z (x,y = e C 33 z 2 2π β e (z ᾱ 32 2 β 3 dz 3 e 2 ( 2 β 3 C 33 z ᾱ 32 β 3 e ᾱ3 ( 2π β 3 e 2 (ζ ᾱ 32 β 3 2 β 3 C 33 z (x,y = 2 β 3 C 33 = e( 2 (θ2 β 3 ᾱ3 θ d (x,y C 33 2 β 3 2π β 3 e ᾱ3 ( / 2 β 3 C 33 β 3 β 3 z dz 2 β 3 C 33 e 2 (ζ ᾱ 32 β 3 e θζ dζ ζ 2 β 3 C 33 dζ e s2 2 ds= e( 2 (θ2 β 3 ᾱ3 θ 2π 2 β 3 C Φ(d (x,y. 33 On he oher hand, always using he resuls of subsecion 3.3 concerning he Gaussian disribuion f 3 ( = f Ψ 3( and making his ime he change of variables ζ := (z ᾱ3, we obain β 3 (79 z (x,y e C 33 ( z 2 f 3 (zdz=e C 33 ( z 2 z (x,y = e C 33 ( z 2 d 3 (x,y 2π β e (z ᾱ 32 2 β 3 dz 3 2π e 2 ζ 2 dζ = e C 33 ( z 2 Φ(d 3 (x,y. (80 Similarly, we have + z 2 (x,y + z 2 (x,y e C 33 z 2 f 3 (zdz= 2 β 3 C e ( 2 (θ2 β 3 ᾱ3 θ Φ( d 2 (x,y 33 e C 33 ( z 2 f 3 (zdz=e C 33 ( z 2 2 Φ( d 4 (x,y. (8 Case ii: We come nex o he case (x,y M c, for which g(x,y,z g(x,y,0> R. For P 2 (0; + we obain

28 28 Zorana Grbac and Laura Meneghello and Wolfgang J. Runggaldier ( P 2 (0; + = p(0, + M c eā+(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 + C 33 z 2 R R f 3 (z f 2 (y f (xdzdydx ( = p(0, + eā M c e(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 f (x f 2 (ydxdy e C 33 z 2 f 3 (zdz R RQ + [(Ψ,Ψ 2 Mc ] (82 (eā[ ] = p(0, + M c e(κ+b x+c 22 y 2 e ( 2 (θ 3 2 β 3 ᾱ3 θ 3 f (x f 2 (ydxdy RQ + [(Ψ,Ψ M 2 c ], 2 β 3 C 33 where we compued he inegral over R analogously o (79. Adding he wo expressions derived for Cases i and ii, we obain he saemen of he proposiion. 5.2 Swapions We sar by recalling some of he mos relevan aspecs of a (payer swapion. Considering a swap (see subsecion 4.2 for a given collecion of daes 0 0 < < < n, a swapion is an opion o ener he swap a a pre-specified iniiaion dae 0, which is hus also he mauriy of he swapion and ha, for simpliciy of noaion, we assume o coincide wih 0, i.e. = 0. he arbirage-free swapion price a 0 can be compued as { (P P Swn (; 0, n,r= p(, 0 E 0 Sw ( 0 ; n,r } + F, (83 where we have used he shorhand noaion P Sw ( 0 ; n,r=p Sw ( 0 ; 0, n,r. We firs sae he nex Lemma, ha follows immediaely from he expression for ρ 3 (, k and he corresponding expression for h 3 k in (65. Lemma 5.2 We have he equivalence ρ 3 (, k >0 h 3 k (0,. (84 4(σ 3 2 e 2b3 ( k his lemma promps us o spli he swapion pricing problem ino wo cases: Case : h 3 k < 0 or h3 k > 4(σ 3 2 e 2b3 ( k Case : 0<h 3 k < 4(σ 3 2 e 2b3 ( k. (85