Dependent Interest and Transition Rates in Life Insurance


 Madison Parsons
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Dependen Ineres and ransiion Raes in Life Insurance Krisian Buchard Universiy of Copenhagen and PFA Pension January 28, 2013 Absrac In order o find marke consisen bes esimaes of life insurance liabiliies modelled wih a mulisae Markov chain, i is of imporance o consider he ineres and ransiion raes as sochasic processes, and hedging possibiliies of he risks. his is usually done wih an assumpion of independence beween he ineres and ransiion raes. In his paper, i is shown how o valuae life insurance liabiliies using affine processes for modelling dependen ineres and ransiion raes. his approach leads o he inroducion of socalled generalised forward raes. We propose a specific model for surrender modelling, and wihin his model he generalised forward raes are calculaed, and he marke value and he Solvency II capial requiremen are examined for a simple savings conrac. Keywords: Affine Processes; Doubly Sochasic Process; Mulisae Life Insurance Models; Policyholder Behaviour; Solvency II JL Classificaion: G22 1 Inroducion Life insurance liabiliies are radiionally modelled by a finie sae Markov chain wih deerminisic ineres and ransiion raes. In order o give a marke consisen bes esimae of he presen value of fuure paymens, i has become of increasing ineres o le he ineres and ransiion raes be modelled as sochasic processes. he sochasic modelling is imporan in order o consider hedging possibiliies of he risks. Wih he Solvency II rules, sochasic modelling of he ineres and ransiion raes is also imporan from a risk managemen perspecive. Modelling he ineres and ransiion Deparmen of Mahemaical Sciences, Universiy of Copenhagen, Universiesparken 5, DK Copenhagen O and PFA Pension, Sundkrogsgade 4, DK2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark, hp://mah.ku.dk/~buchard, 1
2 raes as sochasic processes is radiionally done wih an independence assumpion. In his paper, we relax he independence assumpion, and consider basic valuaion wih dependence beween he ineres and one or more ransiion raes. his is done wih coninuous affine processes for he modelling of he dependen raes. he sudy of valuaion of life insurance liabiliies wih dependen raes leads o he definiion of socalled generalised forward raes. hese are naural quaniies ha appear in case of dependence, replacing he usual forward raes, which are no direcly applicable. Using he heory of dependen affine raes, we consider he case of surrender modelling, and propose a specific model for dependen ineres and surrender raes. his is of paricular ineres from a Solvency II poin of view. Wihin his model, a simple savings conrac wih a buyback opion is considered. We calculae he generalised forward raes, he marke value and he Solvency II capial requiremen. his is done in par wihou hedging, and in par wih a simple saic hedging sraegy. We hen examine he effec of correlaion beween he ineres and surrender rae. he sudy of valuaion of life insurance liabiliies wih sochasic ineres and ransiion raes has received considerable aenion during he las decades. Primarily he ineres and moraliy raes have been modelled as sochasic, which is ofen done wih affine processes. For basic applicaions of affine processes for valuaion of life insurance liabiliies, see [1]. Possibiliies of hedging can be considered, which is imporan for marke consisen valuaion, and for he sudy of valuaion and hedging of life insurance liabiliies wih sochasic ineres and moraliy raes, see [7] and [6]. Anoher approach o modelling sochasic ineres and moraliy is aken in [15], where he ineres and moraliy is modelled wihin a finie sae Markov chain seup. In his paper we exend he sudy of affine ineres and ransiion raes o he case of dependence. We consider how o valuae life insurance liabiliies when he ineres and one or more ransiion raes are modelled as dependen affine processes. his is possible in any decremen/hierarchical Markov chain seup, ha is, in Markov chains where, when he process leaves a sae, i canno reurn. We adop he heory presened in [4], which is reviewed in Secion 2 of his paper. his provides he foundaion for he sudy of mulidimensional affine processes in life insurance mahemaics. he heory presened in [4] is based parly on a resul in [8], and parly on general heory for mulidimensional affine processes presened in [9]. In he financial lieraure, he concep of a forward ineres rae exiss, which is convenien for e.g. represening zero coupon bond prices. his quaniy appears naurally in life insurance mahemaics, when he ineres rae is modelled as a sochasic process. If one also considers a sochasic moraliy, independen of he ineres rae, i becomes naural o define a forward moraliy rae as well. Wih hese forward raes, he expeced presen value of he life insurance liabiliies looks paricularly compelling. However, if one inroduces dependence beween he ineres and moraliy raes, he for 2
3 ward raes are no longer applicable. For a general discussion on forward raes, and heir usefulness, see [14], wherein he case of dependence beween he raes is discussed as well. In [11], alernaive forward moraliy raes are defined in order o handle he case of dependence. In his paper, we show ha one of he forward moraliy raes defined in [11] is in general no well defined. Insead, we inroduce he concep of generalised forward raes, which appear naurally and can be used o express he expeced presen value of he life insurance liabiliies in a convenien form. he generalised forward raes indeed generalise he usual definiions of forward raes, in he sense ha when here is independence beween he raes, he generalised forward raes equal he usual forward raes. Modelling policyholder behaviour has become of increasing imporance wih he proposed Solvency II rules, where one is required o consider any dependence beween he economic environmen and policyholder behaviour, see Secion 3.5 in [5]. he sudy of surrender behaviour can eiher be made using a raional approach, where he ouse is, ha he policyholders surrender he conrac if i is raional from some economic viewpoin. his seems a bi exreme, given ha his behaviour is no seen in pracice. Anoher approach is he inensiy approach, where he policyholders surrender randomly, regardless wheher or no i is profiable in he curren economic environmen. his is no a perfec way of modelling eiher, since if he ineres raes decrease a lo, a guaranee given in connecion wih he life insurance conrac moivaes he policyholders o keeping he conrac. For an overview of some of he approaches, see [12]. In [10], an aemp is made on coupling he wo approaches, using wo differen surrender rae models if i is raional or irraional, respecively, o surrender. In his paper, we propose anoher way of coupling he wo approaches. We le he surrender rae be posiively correlaed wih he ineres rae, hus if he ineres rae decreases a lo, he surrender rae also decreases, represening ha he guaranee inheren in he life insurance conrac is of value o he policyholder. he Solvency II capial requiremen is basically, ha he insurance company mus have enough capial, such ha he probabiliy of defaul wihin he nex year is less han 0.5%, represening ha a defaul is a 200year even. When he insurance company updaes is moraliy ables, or oher ransiion rae ables, his represens a risk ha mus be aken ino accoun when puing up he Solvency II capial requiremen. Mahemaically, his can be done using sochasic raes. For an examinaion of moraliy modelling and he Solvency II capial requiremen, see e.g. [2]. For a basic discussion of he mahemaical formulaion of he Solvency II capial requiremen, see e.g. [3]. In his paper, we deermine he Solvency II capial requiremen for he simple savings conrac, boh in he case of no hedging sraegy, and also in he case of a simple sraegy where ineres rae risk is hedged. he srucure of he paper is as follows. In Secion 2, we presen basic resuls on mulidi 3
4 mensional coninuous affine processes, which provides he foundaion for he applicaion of dependen affine processes in life insurance mahemaics. In Secion 3, we presen he general life insurance seup wih sochasic ineres and ransiion raes, and in Secion 4, we propose he definiion of generalised forward raes, which is compared o he usual definiion in Secion 4.1. In Secion 4.2, we discuss oher definiions in he lieraure of forward raes in a dependen seup, and in paricular, we show ha he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances proposed in [11] does no always exis. In Secion 5, we presen a specific model for dependen ineres and surrender raes. he model is inroduced in Secion 5.1. We firs discuss how o find he Solvency II capial requiremen, which is done in Secion 5.3, and a simple hedging sraegy for he ineres rae risk is presened in Secion 5.4. Numerical resuls are presened in Secion 5.5, consising of he generalised forward raes found, and he marke value and Solvency II capial requiremen, presened for differen levels of correlaion. 2 Coninuous Affine Processes he class of affine processes provides a mehod for modelling ineres and ransiion raes, wih he possibiliy of adding dependence. In his secion, we consider general resuls abou coninuous affine processes, which we apply in his paper. For more deails on he heory presened in his secion, see [4]. Le X be a ddimensional affine process, saisfying he sochasic differenial equaion dx() = (b() + B()X()) d + ρ(, X()) dw (), where W is a ddimensional Brownian moion. Here, b : R + R d is a vecor funcion, and B : R + R d d is a marix funcion, where we denoe column i by β i (), so ha B() = (β 1 (),..., β d ()). When squared, he volailiy parameer funcion ρ(, x) mus be affine in x, i.e. ρ(, x)ρ(, x) = a() + d α i ()x i, for marix funcions a : R + R d d and α i : R + R d d. Consider now affine ransformaions of X, by defining a vecor funcion c : R + R p and a marix funcion Γ : R + R p d, hereby defining he pdimensional process, i=1 Y () = c() + Γ()X(). (2.1) We hink of X as socioeconomic driving facors, and hen Y is a collecion of he sochasic ineres rae and/or ransiion raes. In his secion, we work in a probabiliy 4
5 space (Ω, F, F, P ) wih he filraion F = (F()) R+ generaed by he Brownian moion W. For applicaions of Y as ineres and as ransiion raes in finie sae Markov chain models, we presen some essenial relaions. he resuls hold under cerain regulariy condiions, for deails see [4]. Denoe by 1 a vecor wih 1 in all enries, where he dimension is implici. Also, denoe by γ i () he sum of he ih column in Γ(), i.e. γ i () = 11 Γ()e i, where e i is he ih uni vecor, i = 1,..., d. he firs relaion, he basic pricing formula, is for 0 given by 11 Y (s) ds F() = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X(), (2.2) where φ(, ) is a real funcion, and ψ(, ) is a pdimensional funcion, given by he sysem of differenial equaions, φ(, ) = 1 2 ψ(, ) a()ψ(, ) b() ψ(, ) + 11 c(), ψ i(, ) = 1 2 ψ(, ) α i ()ψ(, ) β i () ψ(, ) + γ i (), i = 1,..., d, (2.3) wih boundary condiions φ(, ) = 0 and ψ(, ) = 0. For he second relaion, le a vecor κ R p be given, and le u [, ] be some ime poin. hen, 11 Y (s) ds κ ( ) Y (u) F() = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X() A(,, u) + B(,, u) X(), (2.4) where (φ, ψ) is given by (2.3) as above, A is a real funcion and B is a vecor funcion, given by he sysem of differenial equaions, A(,, u) = ψ(, ) a()b(,, u) b() B(,, u), B i(,, u) = ψ(, ) α i ()B(,, u) β i () B(,, u), i = 1,..., d, (2.5) wih boundary condiions A(u,, u) = κ c(u) and B(u,, u) = κ Γ(u). A paricular example of imporance is κ = e k for some k = 1,..., p, and in his case, we wrie A k and B k o emphasize he dependence on k. his second relaion (2.4) is proven in [8] for u =, and he exension o he case u < is for example given in [4]. he hird relaion is, for anoher ime poin v [, ], and wo inegers k, l = 1,..., p, 5
6 given by 11 Y (s) ds Y k (u)y l (v) F() = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X() { ( ) ( ) A k (,, u) + B k (,, u) X() A l (,, v) + B l (,, v) X() } + C kl (,, u, v) + D kl (,, u, v) X(), (2.6) where (φ, ψ) solves (2.3) and (A k, B k ) and (A l, B l ) boh solve (2.5) wih boundary condiions A k (u,, u) = e k c(u), Bk (u,, u) = e k Γ(u) and Al (v,, v) = e l c(v), Bl (v,, v) = e l Γ(v), respecively. he funcions Ckl and D kl are deermined by he following sysem of differenial equaions, Ckl (,, u, v) = B k (,, u) a()b l (,, v) ψ(, ) a()d kl (,, u, v) b() D kl (,, u, v), Dkl i (,, u, v) = B k (,, u) α i ()B l (,, v) ψ(, ) α i ()D kl (,, u, v) β i () D kl (,, u, v), (2.7) for i = 1,..., d, wih boundary condiions 1 C kl (u v,, u, v) = 0 and D kl (u v,, u, v) = 0. his resul is proven in [4]. 3 he Life Insurance Model Consider he usual life insurance seup. Le Z = (Z()) R+ be a Markov process in he finie sae space J, indicaing he sae of he insured. he disribuion of Z is defined via he ransiion raes (µ ij ()) R+, i, j J. Wih (N ij ()) R+, i, j J being he process ha couns he number of jumps for Z from sae i o j, he compensaed process N ij () 0 1 (Z(s )=i) µ ij (s) ds is a maringale. We can allow he ransiion raes (µ ij ) o be sochasic. In his case, he disribuion of Z is defined condiionally on he ransiion raes. We model he ransiion raes as a imedependen affine ransformaion of a ddimensional coninuous affine process X. ha is, for funcions c : R + R p and Γ : R + R p d, le Y be defined as 1 he noaion x y = min{x, y} is used. Y () = c() + Γ()X(). 6
7 Hence, each of he sochasic ransiion raes are modelled as an elemen in Y. he ineres rae process (r()) R+ is also allowed o be sochasic. his is modelled in he same way, by specifying r as an elemen in Y. By he design of Γ and X, he ineres and ransiion raes can be dependen, independen or deerminisic. Le he filraions F Z = (F Z ()) R+ and F X = (F X ()) R+ be he ones generaed by he processes Z and X, respecively, saisfying he usual hypohesis. We consider he probabiliy space (Ω, F, F, P ), where he filraion F = (F()) R+ is given by F() = F Z () F X (). We consider a life insurance policy, wih paymens specified by he process B = (B()) R+, such ha B() is he oal paymens unil ime. hen we can hink of db() as he paymen a ime, and we can specify B as db() = 1 (Z()=i) b i () d + b ij () dn ij (), i J for deerminisic paymen funcions b i and b ij, i, j J. hen b i () is he paymen while in sae i a ime, and b ij () is he paymen if jumping from sae i o j a ime. he presen value a ime of he fuure paymens associaed wih he life insurance policy is given by P V () = i,j J i j e s r(τ) dτ db(s). For reserving and pricing, one considers he expeced presen value [ V () = e ] s r(τ) dτ db(s) F(), where he expecaion is aken using a marke, risk neural or pricing measure. For acually calculaing V (), he ower propery is applied, ha is, we condiion on F X ( ) o ge [ V X () = e ] s r(τ) dτ db(s) F Z () F X ( ), so ha V () = [ V X () F() ]. Here, V X () is he reserve condiional on he ineres and ransiion raes, hus corresponding o he case of deerminisic raes. When valuaing V X we need he condiional disribuion of Z, and hus B, given he ransiion raes. By consrucion his is known, and wellesablished heory abou life insurance reserves wih deerminisic ineres and ransiion raes (see e.g. [13]) hold. 7
8 xample 3.1. Consider a surrender model wih 3 saes J = {0, 1, 2}, corresponding o alive, dead and surrendered respecively. he Markov model is shown in Figure 1. Le he ransiion rae from sae alive o sae dead, i.e. he moraliy rae, be deerminisic. We model he ineres rae r and he surrender rae η as dependen affine processes in he form, (r(), η()) = c() + Γ()X(), for a ddimensional affine process X. Hence, his specificaion is analog o (2.1). By he design of X, he processes X i, i = 1,..., d can be dependen processes, such ha he ineres rae r and he surrender rae η can be dependen processes. Alive 0 1 Dead µ η 2 Surrendered Figure 1: Markov model for he survivalsurrender model. Le he paymens be defined by db() = b()1 (Z()=0) d + b d () dn 01 () + U() dn 02 (), where b() is he coninuous paymen rae a ime while alive, b d () is he single paymen if deah occurs a ime, and U() is he paymen upon surrender a ime. he paymen funcions are deerminisic. Condiioning on he inensiies, he expeced presen value V X () is he classic resul, V X () = [ P V () F X (), Z() = 0 ] = e s (r(τ)+µ(τ)+η(τ)) dτ (b(s) + µ(s)b d (s) + η(s)u(s)) ds, see e.g. [13]. Removing he condiion, we find, using heorem (2.2) and (2.4), V () = [ V X () F() ] 8
9 = = e { s µ(τ) dτ [e ] s (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ F() (b(s) + µ(s)b d (s)) + [e s (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ η(s) F() + ] } U(s) ds e ( s µ(τ) dτ+φ(,s)+ψ(,s) X() b(s) + µ(s)b d (s) ) ( A η (, s, s) + B η (, s, s) X() ) U(s) ds. 4 Generalised Forward Raes he form of V () in xample 3.1 moivaes he definiion of quaniies similar o forward raes, ha can be used o express he soluion. In paricular, his leads o a forward ineres rae, bu his is in general no equal he forward rae obained using he usual definiion. Hence, we apply he erm generalised forward raes. Le X, c() and Γ() be given, and le Y be of he form (2.1). Consider firs he moivaing calculaions, 11 Y (s) ds 11 Y ( ) F() = [ e ] 11 Y (s) ds F() = eφ(, )+ψ(, ) X() ( = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X() ( φ(, ) + X() )) ψ(, ), where we inerchanged inegraion and differeniaion, and applied (2.2). On he oher hand, if we insead apply (2.4) wih κ = 11, we find 11 Y (s) ds 11 Y ( ) F() ( ) = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X() A(,, ) + X() B(,, ), ( p ) p = e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X() A k (,, ) + X() B k (,, ), k=1 where (A k, B k ), k = 1,..., p are soluions o (2.5) wih boundary condiions given by κ = e k, i.e. A k (,, ) = e k c( ) and Bk (,, ) = e k Γ( ). he las equaliy sign is obained using he relaions p k=1 Ak (,, ) = A(,, ) and p k=1 Bk (,, ) = B(,, ), which hold since (A, B) also solves he linear sysem of differenial equaions k=1 9
10 (2.5), wih boundary condiions given by κ = 11. Gahering he wo calculaions above, we conclude ha φ(, ) = p A k (,, ), k=1 ψ(, ) = p B k (,, ), k=1 and, in paricular, since φ(, ) = 0 and ψ(, ) = 0, ha φ(, ) = d A k (, s, s) ds, k=1 ψ(, ) = d B k (, s, s) ds. (4.1) k=1 Definiion 4.1. Le X be a ddimensional coninuous affine process, and le c and Γ be given, such ha Y from (2.1) is defined. Le s and k = {1,..., d}. he generalised forward rae f k (s) for he sochasic rae Y k (s) a ime is hen given by f k (s) = A k (, s, s) + X() B k (, s, s), where (A k, B k ) solves he sysem of differenial equaions (2.5), wih boundary condiions given by κ = e k. Remark 4.2. Using he noaion of he generalised forward raes, we can hen express he relaion (2.3), and for u = also he relaion (2.5), as 11 Y (s) ds F() = e d i=1 f i(s) ds, 11 Y (s) ds Y k ( ) F() = e d (4.2) i=1 f i(s) ds f k ( ). xample 4.3. (xample 3.1 coninued) Using he definiion of he generalised forward raes, we can wrie he expeced presen value as, V () = e s (f r (τ)+µ(τ)+f η (τ)) dτ ( b(s) + µ(s)b d (s) + f η (s)u(s) ) ds. We see ha he expeced presen value is of he same form as he formula ha appears in he case of deerminisic raes, bu wih he ineres and surrender raes exchanged by he corresponding generalised forward raes. Noe ha we used a slighly differen noaion, such ha we wrie f r insead of f 1 and f η insead of f 2. Ofen we wan o consider boh he quaniy 11 Y (s) ds F() = [e ] (r(s)+η(s)) ds F(), 10
11 4.1 Comparison Wih he Usual Forward Ineres Rae where Y () = (r(), η()), as well as he quaniies arising from he models Y 1 () = (r(), 0) and Y 2 () = (0, η()), 11 Y 1 (s) ds F() = r(s) ds F(), 11 Y 2 (s) ds F() = η(s) ds F(). In such cases, we add a more deailed superscrip o he forward raes f, and specify he model we hink of afer a colon. ha is, we wrie [e ] (r(s)+η(s)) ds F() = e r:(r+η) (f (s)+f η:(r+η) (s)) ds, as well as [e [e r(s) ds η(s) ds ] F() = e ] F() = e f r:r (s) ds, f η:η (s) ds. Noe ha f r:r (s) and f µ:µ (s) are he usual forward raes. 4.1 Comparison Wih he Usual Forward Ineres Rae Le he model Y () = c() + Γ()X() be given, for d > 1, and le r() = Y 1 () be he ineres rae. he forward ineres rae is he funcion g (s) ha saisfies r(s) ds F() = e g (s) ds. his funcion also saisfies, as can be shown by differeniaion, r(s) ds r( ) F() = e g (s) ds g ( ). (4.3) he generalised forward rae for he ineres rae in our model Y, as defined in Definiion 4.1, is denoed f r (s). I saisfies, (r(s)+y 2(s)+...+Y d (s)) ds r( ) F() = e (f r(s)+f 2(s)+...+f d(s)) ds f r ( ), (4.4) where he oher forward raes f i (s) saisfies analogue relaions. We noe, ha while he usual forward ineres rae is defined for any sochasic ineres rae, he generalised forward raes from Definiion 4.1 are only defined for (coninuous) affine sochasic raes. In he case ha r = (r()) R+ is independen of Y 2,..., Y d, he generalised forward rae for he ineres r simplifies o he usual forward ineres rae. his can be seen by 11
12 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups wo simple calculaions. Firs, see ha e (f r(s)+f 2(s)+...+f d (s)) ds = = = e [e [e (r(s)+y 2(s)+...+Y d (s)) ds r(s) ds g (s) ds ] F() [e [e ] F() (Y 2(s)+...+Y d (s)) ds (Y 2(s)+...+Y d (s)) ds ] F(). ] F() (4.5) A similar calculaion yields, using (4.4) and (4.3), yields e (f r(s)+f 2(s)+...+f d(s)) ds f r ( ) = e g (s) ds g ( ) [e (Y 2(s)+...+Y d (s)) ds Dividing wih he ideniy (4.5) above, we conclude ha f r ( ) = g ( ), ] F(). which holds for all where <, and we conclude ha he generalised forward rae (on he lef hand side) equals he forward ineres rae (on he righ hand side). he calculaions relied criically on he independence assumpion, and in he general case he generalised forward rae for he ineres is no equal o he forward ineres rae. Inuiively, when he ineres rae appears ogeher wih oher dependen raes, he forward raes need o compensae for his dependence. hus, he generalised forward rae includes a covariance erm, which is no presen in he usual forward ineres rae. 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups For he case of dependen affine raes, here have been oher proposals for he definiion of forward raes. In [11], he model conains an ineres rae and a moraliy rae which are dependen. his corresponds o he case d = 2, where r() = Y 1 () is he ineres rae and µ() = Y 2 () is he moraliy rae. heir approach is o keep he definiion of he forward ineres rae g : [, ) R + unchanged, and hen find forward moraliy raes ha are compaible wih his definiion. In order o make his idea work, hey define wo differen moraliy raes, one for pure endowmens, and one for erm insurances. We briefly review his approach and compare o he definiion of he generalised forward raes in he previous secion. he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmens, h pe funcion saisfying [e ] (r(s)+µ(s)) ds F() : [, ) R +, is defined as he = e (g (s)+h pe (s)) ds. 12
13 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups In erms of he generalised forward raes, f r and f µ, we can use he firs par of (4.2) and wrie he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen as, h pe (s) = f r (s) + f µ (s) g (s), (4.6) which in paricular shows ha i is welldefined. he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen can be given an inuiive inerpreaion. Recall ha he generalised forward raes are differen from he usual definiion of forward raes, because he moraliy rae appears ogeher wih anoher dependen rae, hus he generalised forward raes conains a covariance par. he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmens corresponds o moving he covariance from he forward ineres rae ino he forward moraliy rae, insead of having a par in each of he forward raes. In oher words, f r + f µ conains he covariance erms, and subracing g, which does no conain any covariance erms, he covariance erms are conained in h pe. In his way, he original definiion of he forward ineres rae can be kep unalered, bu one can say ha he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen h pe conains a covariance erm belonging o he ineres rae. he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances, h i funcion saisfying, [ e ] u (r(s)+µ(s)) ds µ(u) du F() = : [, ) R +, is defined as he e u (g (s)+h i (s)) ds h i (u) du. (4.7) o esablish ha h i is welldefined is no as easy as wih he forward moraliy rae for he pure endowmen. Firs, see ha he definiion depends on he choice of. I is naural o make he assumpion ha he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances h i is independen of. his assumpion is impliciy made in he noaion used in [11], and he assumpion is also made for he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen. Wih his assumpion of independence of, we can differeniae wih respec o, and find he equivalen definiion, (r(s)+µ(s)) ds µ( ) F() = e for. For he res of he paper, his definiion is used. (g (s)+h i (s)) ds h i ( ), (4.8) Comparing o he generalised forward raes, we consider a policy consising of a life annuiy wih a paymen rae b, and a erm insurance wih paymen 1 upon deah. he policy erminaes a ime. he expeced presen value a ime is [ e ] s (r(s)+µ(s)) ds (b + µ(s)) ds F() 13
14 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups = = e s r:(r+µ) (f (s)+f µ:(r+µ) e s g(s) ds ( e s hpe (s)) ds ( b + f µ:(r+µ) ) (s) ds (s) ds b + e ) s hi (s) ds h i (s) ds, where we firs wroe i in erms of he generalised forward raes, and aferwards in erms of he forward moraliy raes for pure endowmen and erm insurances, respecively. his illusraes he difference beween he differen ypes of forward raes. he generalised forward rae for moraliy can be used for boh he life annuiy and he erm insurance, whereas wih he oher forward moraliy rae definiions, one need a differen one for a differen produc. If he ineres rae is independen of he moraliy rae, he differen forward moraliy raes simplify and hey all equal he usual usual forward moraliy rae Forward Moraliy Rae for erm Insurances nosowell Defined We have no examined wheher he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances is well defined. I urns ou, ha when here is dependence beween he ineres and moraliy raes, here are cases where he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances defined by (4.8) does no exis. his will in paricular be he case for models wih posiive correllaion. Consider a ineres and moraliy rae model (r(), µ()). his give us a se of generalised forward raes, and a forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen. Assume ha he following assumpions hold. Assumpion 4.4. Le a model for he ineres and moraliy raes r() and µ() be given. he assumpions are, 1. h pe (s) > 0 for all s >. 2. h pe is bounded from below for some imepoin, i.e. here exis ε > 0 and 0 > 0 such ha h pe (s) > ε for all s > he forward ineres rae is greaer han he generalised forward rae for he ineres, g (s) > f r (s), for all s >. I is indeed possible o consruc models where hese assumpions hold, and indeed, hey will hold for mos models when here is a posiive correlaion beween he ineres rae and moraliy rae. he firs wo assumpions sae ha he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen is posiive and bounded below from some ime, which is saisfied 14
15 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups in reasonable models. he hird assumpion assumpion usually holds when here is a posiive correlaion beween he ineres and moraliy rae. he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen, h pe (s), presen in he assumpions, is no he objec of ineres in his example. In view of (4.6), i can be hough of as a placeholder for f r + f µ g. Proposiion 4.5. Under Assumpion 4.4, here exiss a > 0 such ha he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances h i (s) given by (4.8) does no exis for s >. Proof. Combining (4.8) and (4.2), and hen using (4.6) wice, we ge ha e and by inegraion we find e h i (s) ds h i ( ) = e (f r (s)+f µ (s) g(s)) ds f µ ( ) = e h i (s) ds = 1 e τ h pe (s) ds (h pe ( ) + g ( ) f r ( )), hpe (s) ds (h pe (τ) + g (τ) f r (τ)) dτ. (4.9) Since he lef hand side mus be posiive for any, we conclude ha he condiion e τ hpe (s) ds (h pe (τ) + g (τ) f r (τ)) dτ < 1 (4.10) is necessary for he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances o be welldefined. Under he firs assumpion, he forward moraliy rae for pure endowmen, h pe, defines a disribuion in a wosae Markov chain, and we recognise he inegral hpe (s) ds (τ) dτ as a probabiliy: Le Z be a sochasic variable ha denoes he lifeime in a h pe survival model where deah occurs wih rae h pe e τ hpe (s) a ime s. hen (s) ds h pe (τ) dτ = P (Z Z > ). Also, under he second assumpion he probabiliy converges o 1, P (Z Z > ) 1 for. e τ Consider now (4.10). Under he hird assumpion, g (s) > f r (s) for all s >, here exiss ε > 0 and such ha e τ hpe (s) ds (g (τ) f r (τ)) dτ > ε, 15
16 4.2 Comparison Wih Oher Dependen Seups for all >. his allows us o conclude, for a > large enough, such ha P (Z Z > ) > 1 ε, ha e τ hpe (s) ds (h pe (τ) + g (τ) f r (τ)) dτ > P (Z Z > ) + ε > 1. his conradics (4.10), and he forward moraliy rae for erm insurances does no exis. For compleeness, we specify a model saisfying Assumpion 4.4. Le he 2dimensional process X saisfy dx 1 () = (1 X 1 ()) d + σ dw 1 (), dx 2 () = (1 X 2 ()) d + σλ dw 1 () + σ 1 λ 2 dw 2 (), wih X(0) = (1, 1). Le he ineres rae and moraliy rae be given by r() = r 0 X 1 (), µ() = µ () + X 2 () 1, wih parameers λ = 0.8, σ = 0.07 and base moraliy µ () = ha his model saisfies Assumpion 4.4 is no shown here Somewha Generalised Forward Raes A discussion of he concep of forward raes, and generalisaions, should no be underaken wihou a reference o [14]. In he aricle, a scepical view on he concep of forward moraliy raes is adoped, and he fruifulness of he concep is quesioned. In view of his aricle, i is no a all clear ha he concep of forward moraliy raes (and generalised forward raes) is fruiful beyond being a convenien noaion for he quaniies needed for calculaion of cerain life insurance liabilies under a sochasic inensiy assumpion. he aricle [14] also discusses requiremens for more generalised forward raes. he generalised forward raes proposed in his aricle does no mee all he requiremens se up in [14]. In paricular, in life insurance models where one needs o use he relaion (2.6), he generalised forward raes are no applicable. hus, i would probably be more suiing o call hem somewha generalised forward raes. 16
17 5 Modelling Ineres and Surrender In order o illusrae he mehods proposed, we pu up a specific model for dependen ineres and surrender rae. We model he ineres rae as a sochasic diffusion process r, and he surrender rae by he diffusion process η. he ineres and surrender raes are hen modelled as dependen processes, wihin he affine seup presened in Secion 2. Wihin he Solvency II regime, one is required o model surrender behaviour, and also ake ino consideraion any dependence of he ineres rae (i.e. he economic environmen), see Secion 3.5 in [5]. his model is hus an example of how his can be done. 5.1 Correlaed Ineres and Surrender Model Le η 0 () be a deerminisic surrender rae, corresponding o bes esimae, i.e. he expecaion of he fuure surrender rae. he ineres rae r() and surrender rae η() are hen modelled as an affine ransformaion of X of he form, r() = X 1 (), η() = η 0 ()X 2 (), where X is a 2dimensional sochasic diffusion process. he process X saisfies he sochasic differenial equaion, ( dx 1 () = (b 1 () β 1 X 1 ()) d + σ 1 1 ρ 2 dw 1 () + ρ ) X 2 () dw 2 (), (5.1) dx 2 () = (b 2 β 2 X 2 ()) d + σ 2 X2 () dw 2 (), where W is a 2dimensional sandard Brownian moion. he parameers saisfy b 2, β 1, β 2, σ 1, σ 2 R + and ρ [ 1, 1], and he funcion b 1 : R + R is chosen such ha an iniial erm srucure is fied. he process X 2 models relaive deviaions of he surrender rae from he bes esimae, and i says nonnegaive, hence he surrender rae η() is nonnegaive. he ineres rae process is a mix beween a HullWhie Vašíček and a Heson model. he model saisfies our crieria. I is affine, since X is affine and he surrender and ineres rae is an affine ransformaion of X. he surrender rae is nonnegaive. Also, choosing no, or lile, mean reversion, sress scenarios produced by he model are close o parallel shifs of he forward raes, which resembles he sress scenarios of he sandard model of Solvency II. 17
18 5.2 he (Life Insurance) Produc Correlaion he correlaion beween he ineres rae and he surrender rae is no in general equal o he dependency parameer ρ. If we assume ha [X 2 ()] = 1 for all, we can calculae he correlaion, using sandard mehods 2, Corr [r(), η()] = ρ e(β 1+β 2 ) 1 β 1 + β 2 In he special case where β 1 = β 2, we ge Corr [r(), η()] = ρ. 2β1 e 2β 1 1 2β2 e 2β 2 1. When he parameers are chosen in Secion below, we see ha indeed [X 2 ()] = 1 and β 1 = β 2 holds. 5.2 he (Life Insurance) Produc Consider a simple savings conrac wih a buyback opion. he savings conrac consiss of a guaraneed paymen of 1 a reiremen a ime. here is an accoun a he provider wih a guaraneed ineres rae ˆr unil ime. he value a ime of he accoun is hen, U() = e ˆr( ). (5.2) he owner of he savings conrac can hen a any ime before ime surrender he conrac and receive he curren accoun value U(). he accoun value U() is no necessarily idenical o he reserve (marke value) of he savings conrac, hus he savings conrac provider has a risk. In order o bes esimae he value of he accoun, he surrender behaviour should be aken ino accoun. here are differen ways o valuae he surrender opion, see [12] and references herein, and [10]. In his paper we adop he inensiy approach, and assume ha he insured surrenders wih rae η() a ime, i.e. in a shor ime inerval [, + d], he insured surrenders wih probabiliy η() d, given ha surrender has no occured before ime. We adop he life insurance seup of Secion 3, and consider he sae of he insured in he sae space J consising of he wo saes alive and surrendered, corresponding o Figure 2. his savings conrac is a simplified version of he produc considered in xample 3.1 and he Markov model shown in Figure 1. I is sraighforward o include he moraliy modelling done in xample 3.1, bu o keep he noaion simple, we omi i from his example. 2 he quaniies [r()] and [η()] can be found aking expecaion on he Iô represenaion, and solving a differenial equaion. he expecaion [r()η()] can be found analogously, by firs finding a sochasic differenial equaion for he process r()η(). 18
19 5.3 Solvency II Alive 0 Surrendered 1 η Figure 2: Markov model for he surrender model. he paymens of he conrac consis of a single paymen upon reiremen a ime, and a paymen upon surrender a ime of size U(). ha is, he oal paymens B() a ime is given by db() = U() dn 01 () + 1 (Z()=0) dε (), where ε is he Dirac measure a. Analogously o he calculaions in xample 3.1 and xample 4.3, we find he presen value a ime of he conrac as P V L () = = e s r(τ) dτ db(s) e s r(τ) dτ U(s) dn 01 (s) + e r(τ) dτ 1 (Z()=0), (5.3) and he marke value a ime is, given he savings conrac has no been surrendered, V () = [ P V L () ] F(), Z() = 0 [ = e s (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ η(s)u(s) ds + e ] (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ F X () = e s + e r:(r+η) (f (τ)+f η:(r+η) (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) r:(r+η) (f (τ)+f η:(r+η) (τ)) dτ. (s)u(s) ds Here we used Remark 4.2. he noaion used is inroduced in xample 4.3 above. (5.4) 5.3 Solvency II For Solvency II purposes one wans o conrol he risk of defaul, such ha i is less han 99.5% during he following year. In his secion we specify how o inerpre his in our seup, following he reasoning of Secion 1.1 in [3]. We wan o find he loss afer one year, which is a sochasic variable, and find quaniles in he disribuion of his sochasic variable. Le P V () denoe he presen value a ime of fuure paymens of he insurance company. A ime 0, he Solvency II loss can be wrien as [P V (0) F(1)], 19
20 5.3 Solvency II where he expecaion is aken using he marke measure, or some reserving measure. For he res of he paper, we refer o his measure as he marke measure. For simpliciy, we ignore he socalled unsysemaic risk during he firs year, ha is, we ake average of he Markov chain Z, condiionally on he underlying inensiies X. Formally, we define he Solvency II loss afer 1 year as L = [ P V (0) F X (1) ]. Boh liabiliies and asses mus be aken ino accoun, so he presen value akes he form P V () = P V L () P V A (), ha is, he presen value of he liabiliies less he asses. For he specific life insurance conrac wih presen value (5.3), we obain, [ P V L (0) F X (1) ] = 1 0 e s 0 (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ η(s)u(s) ds + e 1 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds + e 1 1 e s r:(r+η) 1 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 1 (s)u(s) ds 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds e r:(r+η) 1 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ. (5.5) he simples possible asse allocaion is o deposi all capial in a savings accoun, earning he risk free ineres rae. In ha case, he presen value of he asses is deerminisic and equals he amoun invesed oday. If he value of he liabiliies is invesed, we have P V A (0) = V (0). For our case, V (0) is given by (5.4). Combining, we ge a Solvency II loss, L = [ P V L (0) P V A (0) F X (1) ] = [ P V L (0) F X (1) ] V (0) which is he difference beween (5.5) and (5.4). Rearranging he erms slighly, we can wrie i on he form, L = e s 0 (r(τ)+η(τ)) dτ η(s)u(s) ds 0 e s r:(r+η) 0 (f0 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 0 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 0 (s)u(s) ds + e 1 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds 1 + e 1 1 e s r:(r+η) 1 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 1 (s)u(s) ds e s r:(r+η) 0 (f0 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 0 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 0 (s)u(s) ds 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds e 1 e r:(r+η) 0 (f0 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 0 (τ)) dτ. (f r:(r+η) 1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ 20
21 5.4 Hedging Sraegy wih a Coninuously Paid Coupon Bond he firs wo lines correspond o he losses arising during he firs year because of incorrec expecaions of ineres and surrender behaviour. he las four lines correspond o changed expecaions of he fuure, arising because of informaion received during he firs year. ha is, he hird and fourh line corresponds o changed expecaions of he fuure abou he surrender paymens, and he las wo lines corresponds o changed expecaions of he fuure abou he paymen occuring a reiremen. Inuiively, he informaion received during he firs year allows for an exac discouning during he firs year, and a more precise valuaion of he discouning and surrender behaviour occuring from year 1 an onwards. he loss can be wrien in a simpler form. Using he noaion ha, for s, f r:(r+η) (s) = r(s) and f η:(r+η) (s) = η(s), we can wrie he Solvency II loss as L = 0 e s r:(r+η) 0 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 1 (s)u(s) ds 0 e s r:(r+η) 0 (f0 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 0 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 0 (s)u(s) ds + e r:(r+η) 0 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ e 0 (f r:(r+η) 0 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 0 (τ)) dτ. (5.6) Recalling ha f r:(r+η) 1 and f η:(r+η) 1 are F X (1) measurable, we can use ha X is a Markov process and see ha f r:(r+η) 1 and f η:(r+η) 1 are r(1) and η(1) measurable. hus, he loss can be found by simulaion of r(s) and η(s) for 0 s 1. he simulaion mus be done under he real world probabiliy measure. his is opposed o he marke, or reserving, measure, ha was used o find he loss. In his paper, we assume for simpliciy ha he wo measures are idenical, and do no adap a change of measure approach, relieving us from discussions of preservaion of he Markov propery during measure changes. 5.4 Hedging Sraegy wih a Coninuously Paid Coupon Bond In pracice, an insurer ries o hedge he ineres rae risk, hereby reducing he loss significanly. We consider a simple saic hedging sraegy, in a bond wih coninuous coupon paymens of he form, c() = e 0 f η:η 0 (τ) dτ f η:η 0 ()U(). (5.7) For more deails, see e.g. [12]. his corresponds o he expeced paymens of he life insurance conrac, condiional on he ineres rae. We can associae a paymen process A wih he bond, given by da() = c() d. he presen value of fuure paymens 21
22 5.4 Hedging Sraegy wih a Coninuously Paid Coupon Bond associaed wih he bond is hen, P V A () = = e s r(τ) dτ da(s) e s r(τ) dτ e s 0 f η:η 0 (τ) dτ f η:η 0 (s)u(s) ds. his hedging sraegy is he meanvariance opimal saic hedging sraegy when ineres and surrender are independen. If here is a correlaion beween he ineres and surrender rae, his sraegy is no opimal. he meanvariance opimal saic hedging sraegy is in ha case more complicaed. hese consideraions are for simpliciy omied in his paper, and deferred for fuure sudies. We noe ha he sign of he paymens A is opposie of B, where he laer are paymens o he insured, he former are paymens o he insurer. Considering he life insurance conrac and he hedging sraegy ogeher, we obain a Solvency II loss, [ L = e ] s 0 r(τ) dτ ( db(s) da(s)) F X (1) 0 1 = e ( s 0 r(τ) dτ e s 0 η(τ) dτ η(s) e ) s 0 f η:η 0 (s) ds f η:η 0 (s) U(s) ds 0 + e 1 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds ( + e r:(r+η) 1 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ ( e 1 η:η 0 (r(s)+f0 (s)) ds + e (f r:r η:η 1 (τ)+f0 (τ)) dτ e s r:(r+η) 1 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 1 (s)u(s) ds e s 1 ) ) (f r:r 1 (τ)+f η:η 0 (τ)) dτ f η:η 0 (s)u(s) ds = 0 e s r:(r+η) 0 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) 1 (τ)) dτ f η:(r+η) 1 (s)u(s) ds 0 e s 0 (f r:r 1 + e r:(r+η) 0 (f1 (τ)+f η:(r+η) (τ)+f η:η 0 (τ)) dτ f η:η 0 (s)u(s) ds 1 (τ)) dτ e 0 (f r:r η:η 1 (τ)+f0 (τ)) dτ, (5.8) Similar o (5.6), for s, he noaion ha f r:(r+η) η(s) is used for he las equaliy. (s) = f r:r (s) = r(s) and f η:(r+η) (s) = 22
23 5.5 Numerical Resuls 5.5 Numerical Resuls In his secion we numerically show some consequenses of modelling ineres and surrender as posiively correlaed processes. Firs, he model is specified by choosing a se of parameers, parly inspired by he sress levels in he Solvency II Sandard Formula. Wih his model, we examine he consequenses for he balance shee value of he liabiliies, and he level of he Solvency II capial requiremen, ha is, he liabiliies in 1 years ime. For he Solvency II capial requiremen, in pracice in he indusry, when here is no hedging, mos of he risk is ineres rae risk. Luckily, boh in heory and pracice, a lo of his can be hedged by e.g. buying bonds. For he numerical illusraions of he Solvency II capial requiremen, we consider wo differen sraegies for he asses, corresponding o he wo sraegies considered in Secion 5.3 and Secion 5.4, respecively. Firs, we consider he case where he ineres rae risk is no hedged, and all asses are accumulaed by he risk free ineres rae. Second, we consider he case where he insurer ries o hedge he ineres rae risk, and performs a saic hedge Parameers he numerical examples wih he model (5.1) are carried ou for differen level of correlaion, namely ρ {0, 0.3, 0.7}. Also, we consider wo differen guaraneed ineres raes, namely ˆr {1%, 4%}. his corresponds o a low ineres rae, which could be for a newly issued policy, and a high ineres rae, which could be for a policy issued years ago, when he ineres rae level was higher. We noe ha he base deerminisic surrender rae η 0 corresponds o a person aged 40, hus wih = 25, he conrac ends a age 65. he parameers chosen for he ineres and surrender raes are lised in able 1, and in Figure 3 some realisaions of he ineres and surrender raes are shown. he iniial value X 1 (0) and funcion b 1 () are chosen such ha he erm srucure provided by he Danish FSA a Augus 17, 2012 is mached. Le f FSA () denoe he forward rae provided by he Danish FSA. hen he parameers X 1 and b 1 are fied such ha [e 0 r(s) ds] = e 0 f FSA (s) ds, for all 0. he parameers of he model correspond o he measure used for valuaing he marke value of he life insurance liabiliies. hus, wih respec o he ineres rae i is he risk neural measure. For simpliciy, we assume ha his measure equals he real world probabiliy measure. 23
24 5.5 Numerical Resuls Ineres Rae Simulaion 1 Simulaion 2 Simulaion 3 Forward ineres rae Surrender Rae Simulaion 1 Simulaion 2 Simulaion 3 Base surrender rae ime ime Figure 3: Illusraive realisaions of he ineres rae (lef) and he surrender rae (righ), wih ρ = 0.7. β σ b β σ η 0 () X 2 (0) 1 able 1: Parameers for correlaed ineres and surrender modelling. he iniial value X 1 (0) and he funcion b 1 () are chosen such ha he ineres rae model maches he erm srucure provided by he Danish FSA for valuaing life insurance liabilies, a Augus 17, Generalised Forward Raes In Figure 4, he generalised forward raes are shown. hey are calculaed by solving he differenial equaions (2.3) and (2.5) numerically. For he ineres rae, he forward ineres rae supplied by he Danish FSA, f FSA, is shown as well. We see ha for he case ρ = 0 he generalised forward ineres rae f0 r is idenical o he forward rae provided by he Danish FSA. his is as expeced, since in he case ρ = 0 he ineres rae and surrender rae are independen, and in his case he generalised forward raes are equal o he usual forward raes. For a posiive correlaion, he generalised forward raes are smaller. his is because he sochasic variable, e 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds, which is used o consruc he generalised forward raes, has a heavier ail when he correlaion is sricly posiive, due o he exponenial funcion. Inuiively, here is less diversificaion beween he ineres and surrender rae. For he surrender rae, he basic deerminisic surrender rae η 0 is shown as well as he generalised forward raes. ven hough [η()] = η 0 (), we see ha he generalised 24
25 5.5 Numerical Resuls ineres rae ρ = 0 ρ = 0.3 ρ = 0.7 Danish FSA surrender rae ρ = 0 ρ = 0.3 ρ = 0.7 Base surrender rae ime ime Figure 4: Generalised forward raes. Lef: for he ineres rae, f r:(r+η) 0 (). Righ: for he surrender rae, f η:(r+η) 0 (). he generalised forward raes are shown for differen values of ρ. he forward ineres rae exraced from he Danish FSA a Augus 17, 2012 is also shown, as well as he base deerminisic surrender rae η 0. Higher values of ρ lead o lower values of he forward raes, corresponding o less discouning. forward raes are sysemaically lower han η 0. his is due o Jensens inequaliy, and o see his, consider he case ρ = 0, where we ge, e 0 (f 0 r(s)+f η 0 (s)) ds = = [e > [e [e 0 (r(s)+η(s)) ds] 0 r(s) ds] 0 r(s) ds] e 0 [e 0 η(s) ds] [η(s)] ds = e 0 f r 0 (s) ds e 0 η0 (s) ds, for > 0, using ha he usual forward rae is idenical o he generalised forward rae for ρ = 0. From his inequaliy, we obain, f η 0 () < η0 (), which is wha was observed as he red and black lines in Figure 4. If here is a posiive correlaion, he generalised forward surrender rae, f η:(r+η), is even smaller, similar o he observaion for he ineres raes. 25
26 5.5 Numerical Resuls Marke Value he marke value a ime 0, V (0) from (5.4), can be calculaed, solving he inegral numerically. For his, firs use (4.1) o ge V () = e φ(,s)+ψ(,s) X() f η:(r+η) (s)u(s) ds + e φ(, )+ψ(, ) X(), which is easier o handle from a compuaional poin of view, because he funcions φ and ψ are obained in he process of calculaing he generalised forward raes f r:(r+η) and f η:(r+η) when solving (2.3) and (2.5). he marke value V (0), dependen upon he guaraneed ineres rae ˆr and he correlaion ρ, is shown in able 2. he marke values can be compared o he value of he policyholders accoun which is paid ou on surrender. his is given by (5.2), calculaed using he guaraneed ineres rae. he value a ime 0 is presened in able 3. ˆr 4% 1% ρ able 2: Marke value a ime 0, V (0), of he life insurance conrac. he value is shown using hree differen correlaions, corresponding o hree differen ses of generalised forward raes, red, green and blue from Figure 4. wo differen levels of guaraneed ineres rae, ˆr, is used, which leads o differen surrender payous U(). ˆr 4% 1% able 3: Iniial value of he policyholders accoun, U(0). For he high guaraneed ineres rae (4%), he value is lower han he marke value from able 2. For he low guaraneed ineres rae (1%), he value is higher han he marke value. he marke value wihou surrender modelling, calculaed seing he surrender rae equal o zero, is I is independen of he guaraneed ineres rae. From able 2 i is seen ha when we include surrender modelling he marke value is somewhere beween he value of he policyholders accoun and he marke value calculaed wihou surrender modelling. For boh cases of guaraneed ineres raes, he marke value increases wih correlaion. When we discussed he generalised forward raes in Secion 5.5.2, we saw ha he 26
27 5.5 Numerical Resuls generalised forward raes decrease wih increasing correlaion, which is basically due o he convexiy of he exponenial funcion and Jensen s inequaliy. A smaller generalised forward ineres rae leads o an increasing marke value. For he surrender rae, i is more complicaed. For he case of a guaraneed ineres rae of 4%, an increase in he generalised forward surrender rae rae leads o a decrease in he marke value, because he marke value come closer o he value paid ou on surrender. For he case of a guaraneed ineres rae of 1%, he same argumen ells us ha an increase in he generalised forward surrender rae insead leads o an increasing marke value. We see ha he effec of he decreasing generalised forward ineres rae is larges, and in oal, for boh levels of guaraneed ineres rae, he marke value increases when he correlaion increases Solvency II We examine he effec on he Solvency II capial requiremen wih wo differen sraegies for he asses. For boh sraegies, he iniial marke value of he asses equals he marke value of he liabiliies. he firs sraegy is no hedging, and he second sraegy is a simple saic hedging sraegy. his corresponds o he wo sraegies discussed in Secion 5.3 and Secion 5.4, respecively. For he firs sraegy, where all asses are invesed in he bank accoun, he Solvency II loss is given by (5.6). For he second sraegy, where he ineres rae risk is hedged saically in a bond wih coninuous paymens, he Solvency II loss is given by (5.8). No Hedge Hedge ˆr ˆr 4% 1% 4% 1% ρ able 4: Simulaed Solvency II loss. Wihou hedging i is given by (5.6) and wih he hedging sraegy i is given by (5.8). Applying an ineres hedging sraegy significanly lowers he Solvency II loss. Also, modelling correlaion beween ineres and surrender has a significan impac on he Solvency II loss. In able 4 he Solvency II loss for he differen cases of hedging sraegy, guaraneed ineres rae risk and correlaion is presened. I is immediaely seen, ha rying o hedge he ineres rae risk by applying he simple hedging sraegy significanly reduces he Solvency II loss. For he case of no hedging sraegy, we see wo differen correlaion effecs. When he guaraneed ineres rae is 4%, a higher correlaion means a higher Solvency II loss, 27
28 Numerical Resuls 0.04 surrender rae year surrender rae year ineres rae year ineres rae year ineres rae year surrender rae year surrender rae year Figure 5: Guaraneed ineres rae 4%. Plo of he ineres and surrender rae simulaions afer 1 year in he case wihou any hedging sraegy and correlaion ρ = 0 (lef) and ρ = 0.7 (righ). he color of a mark indicaes he Solvency II loss (5.6), where a darker color is a higher loss, and black colors are losses beyond he 99.5% quanile ineres rae year 1 Figure 6: Guaraneed ineres rae 1%. Plo of he ineres and surrender rae simulaions afer 1 year in he case wihou any hedging sraegy and correlaion ρ = 0 (lef) and ρ = 0.7 (righ). he color of a mark indicaes he Solvency II loss (5.6), where a darker color is a higher loss, and black colors are losses beyond he 99.5% quanile. 28
Life insurance cash flows with policyholder behaviour
Life insurance cash flows wih policyholder behaviour Krisian Buchard,,1 & Thomas Møller, Deparmen of Mahemaical Sciences, Universiy of Copenhagen Universiesparken 5, DK2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark PFA Pension,
More informationPROFIT TEST MODELLING IN LIFE ASSURANCE USING SPREADSHEETS PART ONE
Profi Tes Modelling in Life Assurance Using Spreadshees PROFIT TEST MODELLING IN LIFE ASSURANCE USING SPREADSHEETS PART ONE Erik Alm Peer Millingon 2004 Profi Tes Modelling in Life Assurance Using Spreadshees
More informationDYNAMIC MODELS FOR VALUATION OF WRONGFUL DEATH PAYMENTS
DYNAMIC MODELS FOR VALUATION OF WRONGFUL DEATH PAYMENTS Hong Mao, Shanghai Second Polyechnic Universiy Krzyszof M. Osaszewski, Illinois Sae Universiy Youyu Zhang, Fudan Universiy ABSTRACT Liigaion, exper
More informationOptimal Investment and Consumption Decision of Family with Life Insurance
Opimal Invesmen and Consumpion Decision of Family wih Life Insurance Minsuk Kwak 1 2 Yong Hyun Shin 3 U Jin Choi 4 6h World Congress of he Bachelier Finance Sociey Torono, Canada June 25, 2010 1 Speaker
More informationDuration and Convexity ( ) 20 = Bond B has a maturity of 5 years and also has a required rate of return of 10%. Its price is $613.
Graduae School of Business Adminisraion Universiy of Virginia UVAF38 Duraion and Convexiy he price of a bond is a funcion of he promised paymens and he marke required rae of reurn. Since he promised
More informationTerm Structure of Prices of Asian Options
Term Srucure of Prices of Asian Opions Jirô Akahori, Tsuomu Mikami, Kenji Yasuomi and Teruo Yokoa Dep. of Mahemaical Sciences, Risumeikan Universiy 111 Nojihigashi, Kusasu, Shiga 5258577, Japan Email:
More informationLongevity 11 Lyon 79 September 2015
Longeviy 11 Lyon 79 Sepember 2015 RISK SHARING IN LIFE INSURANCE AND PENSIONS wihin and across generaions Ragnar Norberg ISFA Universié Lyon 1/London School of Economics Email: ragnar.norberg@univlyon1.fr
More informationMarkov Chain Modeling of Policy Holder Behavior in Life Insurance and Pension
Markov Chain Modeling of Policy Holder Behavior in Life Insurance and Pension Lars Frederik Brand Henriksen 1, Jeppe Woemann Nielsen 2, Mogens Seffensen 1, and Chrisian Svensson 2 1 Deparmen of Mahemaical
More informationA TwoAccount Life Insurance Model for ScenarioBased Valuation Including Event Risk Jensen, Ninna Reitzel; Schomacker, Kristian Juul
universiy of copenhagen Universiy of Copenhagen A TwoAccoun Life Insurance Model for ScenarioBased Valuaion Including Even Risk Jensen, Ninna Reizel; Schomacker, Krisian Juul Published in: Risks DOI:
More informationPricing FixedIncome Derivaives wih he ForwardRisk Adjused Measure Jesper Lund Deparmen of Finance he Aarhus School of Business DK8 Aarhus V, Denmark Email: jel@hha.dk Homepage: www.hha.dk/~jel/ Firs
More informationJournal Of Business & Economics Research September 2005 Volume 3, Number 9
Opion Pricing And Mone Carlo Simulaions George M. Jabbour, (Email: jabbour@gwu.edu), George Washingon Universiy YiKang Liu, (yikang@gwu.edu), George Washingon Universiy ABSTRACT The advanage of Mone Carlo
More informationStochastic Optimal Control Problem for Life Insurance
Sochasic Opimal Conrol Problem for Life Insurance s. Basukh 1, D. Nyamsuren 2 1 Deparmen of Economics and Economerics, Insiue of Finance and Economics, Ulaanbaaar, Mongolia 2 School of Mahemaics, Mongolian
More informationTable of contents Chapter 1 Interest rates and factors Chapter 2 Level annuities Chapter 3 Varying annuities
Table of conens Chaper 1 Ineres raes and facors 1 1.1 Ineres 2 1.2 Simple ineres 4 1.3 Compound ineres 6 1.4 Accumulaed value 10 1.5 Presen value 11 1.6 Rae of discoun 13 1.7 Consan force of ineres 17
More informationANALYSIS AND COMPARISONS OF SOME SOLUTION CONCEPTS FOR STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS
ANALYSIS AND COMPARISONS OF SOME SOLUTION CONCEPTS FOR STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS R. Caballero, E. Cerdá, M. M. Muñoz and L. Rey () Deparmen of Applied Economics (Mahemaics), Universiy of Málaga,
More informationOptimal Stock Selling/Buying Strategy with reference to the Ultimate Average
Opimal Sock Selling/Buying Sraegy wih reference o he Ulimae Average Min Dai Dep of Mah, Naional Universiy of Singapore, Singapore Yifei Zhong Dep of Mah, Naional Universiy of Singapore, Singapore July
More informationON THE PRICING OF EQUITYLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS IN GAUSSIAN FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT
Teor Imov r.amaem.sais. Theor. Probabiliy and Mah. Sais. Vip. 7, 24 No. 7, 25, Pages 15 111 S 949(5)6344 Aricle elecronically published on Augus 12, 25 ON THE PRICING OF EQUITYLINKED LIFE INSURANCE
More informationARCH 2013.1 Proceedings
Aricle from: ARCH 213.1 Proceedings Augus 14, 212 Ghislain Leveille, Emmanuel Hamel A renewal model for medical malpracice Ghislain Léveillé École d acuaria Universié Laval, Québec, Canada 47h ARC Conference
More informationThe Transport Equation
The Transpor Equaion Consider a fluid, flowing wih velociy, V, in a hin sraigh ube whose cross secion will be denoed by A. Suppose he fluid conains a conaminan whose concenraion a posiion a ime will be
More informationOption PutCall Parity Relations When the Underlying Security Pays Dividends
Inernaional Journal of Business and conomics, 26, Vol. 5, No. 3, 22523 Opion Puall Pariy Relaions When he Underlying Securiy Pays Dividends Weiyu Guo Deparmen of Finance, Universiy of Nebraska Omaha,
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE DEATH BENEFIT SWITCH OPTION IN UNIVERSAL LIFE POLICIES. Nadine Gatzert
UNDERSTANDING THE DEATH BENEFIT SWITCH OPTION IN UNIVERSAL LIFE POLICIES Nadine Gazer Conac (has changed since iniial submission): Chair for Insurance Managemen Universiy of ErlangenNuremberg Lange Gasse
More informationPrincipal components of stock market dynamics. Methodology and applications in brief (to be updated ) Andrei Bouzaev, bouzaev@ya.
Principal componens of sock marke dynamics Mehodology and applicaions in brief o be updaed Andrei Bouzaev, bouzaev@ya.ru Why principal componens are needed Objecives undersand he evidence of more han one
More informationOption Pricing Under Stochastic Interest Rates
I.J. Engineering and Manufacuring, 0,3, 889 ublished Online June 0 in MECS (hp://www.mecspress.ne) DOI: 0.585/ijem.0.03. Available online a hp://www.mecspress.ne/ijem Opion ricing Under Sochasic Ineres
More informationLIFE INSURANCE WITH STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE. L. Noviyanti a, M. Syamsuddin b
LIFE ISURACE WITH STOCHASTIC ITEREST RATE L. oviyani a, M. Syamsuddin b a Deparmen of Saisics, Universias Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia b Deparmen of Mahemaics, Insiu Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia Absrac.
More informationA general decomposition formula for derivative prices in stochastic volatility models
A general decomposiion formula for derivaive prices in sochasic volailiy models Elisa Alòs Universia Pompeu Fabra C/ Ramón rias Fargas, 57 85 Barcelona Absrac We see ha he price of an european call opion
More informationPresent Value Methodology
Presen Value Mehodology Econ 422 Invesmen, Capial & Finance Universiy of Washingon Eric Zivo Las updaed: April 11, 2010 Presen Value Concep Wealh in Fisher Model: W = Y 0 + Y 1 /(1+r) The consumer/producer
More informationMathematics in Pharmacokinetics What and Why (A second attempt to make it clearer)
Mahemaics in Pharmacokineics Wha and Why (A second aemp o make i clearer) We have used equaions for concenraion () as a funcion of ime (). We will coninue o use hese equaions since he plasma concenraions
More informationRisk Modelling of Collateralised Lending
Risk Modelling of Collaeralised Lending Dae: 4112008 Number: 8/18 Inroducion This noe explains how i is possible o handle collaeralised lending wihin Risk Conroller. The approach draws on he faciliies
More informationOptimal Consumption and Insurance: A ContinuousTime Markov Chain Approach
Opimal Consumpion and Insurance: A ConinuousTime Markov Chain Approach Holger Kraf and Mogens Seffensen Absrac Personal financial decision making plays an imporan role in modern finance. Decision problems
More information11/6/2013. Chapter 14: Dynamic ADAS. Introduction. Introduction. Keeping track of time. The model s elements
Inroducion Chaper 14: Dynamic DS dynamic model of aggregae and aggregae supply gives us more insigh ino how he economy works in he shor run. I is a simplified version of a DSGE model, used in cuingedge
More informationMeasuring macroeconomic volatility Applications to export revenue data, 19702005
FONDATION POUR LES ETUDES ET RERS LE DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL Measuring macroeconomic volailiy Applicaions o expor revenue daa, 1970005 by Joël Cariolle Policy brief no. 47 March 01 The FERDI is a
More informationCredit Index Options: the noarmageddon pricing measure and the role of correlation after the subprime crisis
Second Conference on The Mahemaics of Credi Risk, Princeon May 2324, 2008 Credi Index Opions: he noarmageddon pricing measure and he role of correlaion afer he subprime crisis Damiano Brigo  Join work
More informationLife insurance liabilities with policyholder behaviour and stochastic rates
Life insurance liabiliies wih policyholder behaviour and sochasic raes Krisian Buchard Deparmen of Mahemaical Sciences, Faculy of Science, Universiy of Copenhagen PFA Pension Indusrial PhD Thesis by: Krisian
More informationABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Markov chain, Regulation of payments, Linear regulator, Bellman equations, Constraints. 1. INTRODUCTION
QUADRATIC OPTIMIZATION OF LIFE AND PENSION INSURANCE PAYMENTS BY MOGENS STEFFENSEN ABSTRACT Quadraic opimizaion is he classical approach o opimal conrol of pension funds. Usually he paymen sream is approximaed
More informationIMPLICIT OPTIONS IN LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS FROM OPTION PRICING TO THE PRICE OF THE OPTION. Tobias Dillmann * and Jochen Ruß **
IMPLICIT OPTIONS IN LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS FROM OPTION PRICING TO THE PRICE OF THE OPTION Tobias Dillmann * and Jochen Ruß ** ABSTRACT Insurance conracs ofen include socalled implici or embedded opions.
More informationChapter 7. Response of FirstOrder RL and RC Circuits
Chaper 7. esponse of FirsOrder L and C Circuis 7.1. The Naural esponse of an L Circui 7.2. The Naural esponse of an C Circui 7.3. The ep esponse of L and C Circuis 7.4. A General oluion for ep and Naural
More informationA Note on Using the Svensson procedure to estimate the risk free rate in corporate valuation
A Noe on Using he Svensson procedure o esimae he risk free rae in corporae valuaion By Sven Arnold, Alexander Lahmann and Bernhard Schwezler Ocober 2011 1. The risk free ineres rae in corporae valuaion
More informationRandom Walk in 1D. 3 possible paths x vs n. 5 For our random walk, we assume the probabilities p,q do not depend on time (n)  stationary
Random Walk in D Random walks appear in many cones: diffusion is a random walk process undersanding buffering, waiing imes, queuing more generally he heory of sochasic processes gambling choosing he bes
More informationWorking Paper On the timing option in a futures contract. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 619
econsor www.econsor.eu Der OpenAccessPublikaionsserver der ZBW LeibnizInformaionszenrum Wirschaf The Open Access Publicaion Server of he ZBW Leibniz Informaion Cenre for Economics Biagini, Francesca;
More informationHedging with Forwards and Futures
Hedging wih orwards and uures Hedging in mos cases is sraighforward. You plan o buy 10,000 barrels of oil in six monhs and you wish o eliminae he price risk. If you ake he buyside of a forward/fuures
More informationINTEREST RATE FUTURES AND THEIR OPTIONS: SOME PRICING APPROACHES
INTEREST RATE FUTURES AND THEIR OPTIONS: SOME PRICING APPROACHES OPENGAMMA QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH Absrac. Exchangeraded ineres rae fuures and heir opions are described. The fuure opions include hose paying
More informationThe Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
WEALTH ADVISORY Esae Planning Sraegies for closelyheld, family businesses The Granor Reained Annuiy Trus (GRAT) An efficien wealh ransfer sraegy, paricularly in a low ineres rae environmen Family business
More informationA Universal Pricing Framework for Guaranteed Minimum Benefits in Variable Annuities *
A Universal Pricing Framework for Guaraneed Minimum Benefis in Variable Annuiies * Daniel Bauer Deparmen of Risk Managemen and Insurance, Georgia Sae Universiy 35 Broad Sree, Alana, GA 333, USA Phone:
More informationMorningstar Investor Return
Morningsar Invesor Reurn Morningsar Mehodology Paper Augus 31, 2010 2010 Morningsar, Inc. All righs reserved. The informaion in his documen is he propery of Morningsar, Inc. Reproducion or ranscripion
More informationA Generalized Bivariate OrnsteinUhlenbeck Model for Financial Assets
A Generalized Bivariae OrnseinUhlenbeck Model for Financial Asses Romy Krämer, Mahias Richer Technische Universiä Chemniz, Fakulä für Mahemaik, 917 Chemniz, Germany Absrac In his paper, we sudy mahemaical
More informationDifferential Equations in Finance and Life Insurance
Differenial Equaions in Finance and Life Insurance Mogens Seffensen 1 Inroducion The mahemaics of finance and he mahemaics of life insurance were always inersecing. Life insurance conracs specify an exchange
More informationPATHWISE PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE BOUNDS FOR A PERISHABLE INVENTORY SYSTEM
PATHWISE PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE BOUNDS FOR A PERISHABLE INVENTORY SYSTEM WILLIAM L. COOPER Deparmen of Mechanical Engineering, Universiy of Minnesoa, 111 Church Sree S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455 billcoop@me.umn.edu
More informationBALANCE OF PAYMENTS. First quarter 2008. Balance of payments
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS DATE: 20080530 PUBLISHER: Balance of Paymens and Financial Markes (BFM) Lena Finn + 46 8 506 944 09, lena.finn@scb.se Camilla Bergeling +46 8 506 942 06, camilla.bergeling@scb.se
More information4. International Parity Conditions
4. Inernaional ariy ondiions 4.1 urchasing ower ariy he urchasing ower ariy ( heory is one of he early heories of exchange rae deerminaion. his heory is based on he concep ha he demand for a counry's currency
More informationOptimal Life Insurance Purchase, Consumption and Investment
Opimal Life Insurance Purchase, Consumpion and Invesmen Jinchun Ye a, Sanley R. Pliska b, a Dep. of Mahemaics, Saisics and Compuer Science, Universiy of Illinois a Chicago, Chicago, IL 667, USA b Dep.
More informationValuation of Life Insurance Contracts with Simulated Guaranteed Interest Rate
Valuaion of Life Insurance Conracs wih Simulaed uaraneed Ineres Rae Xia uo and ao Wang Deparmen of Mahemaics Royal Insiue of echnology 100 44 Sockholm Acknowledgmens During he progress of he work on his
More informationSinglemachine Scheduling with Periodic Maintenance and both Preemptive and. Nonpreemptive jobs in Remanufacturing System 1
Absrac number: 050407 Singlemachine Scheduling wih Periodic Mainenance and boh Preempive and Nonpreempive jobs in Remanufacuring Sysem Liu Biyu hen Weida (School of Economics and Managemen Souheas Universiy
More informationMTH6121 Introduction to Mathematical Finance Lesson 5
26 MTH6121 Inroducion o Mahemaical Finance Lesson 5 Conens 2.3 Brownian moion wih drif........................... 27 2.4 Geomeric Brownian moion........................... 28 2.5 Convergence of random
More informationChapter 1.6 Financial Management
Chaper 1.6 Financial Managemen Par I: Objecive ype quesions and answers 1. Simple pay back period is equal o: a) Raio of Firs cos/ne yearly savings b) Raio of Annual gross cash flow/capial cos n c) = (1
More informationA Reexamination of the Joint Mortality Functions
Norh merican cuarial Journal Volume 6, Number 1, p.166170 (2002) Reeaminaion of he Join Morali Funcions bsrac. Heekung Youn, rkad Shemakin, Edwin Herman Universi of S. Thomas, Sain Paul, MN, US Morali
More informationIndividual Health Insurance April 30, 2008 Pages 167170
Individual Healh Insurance April 30, 2008 Pages 167170 We have received feedback ha his secion of he e is confusing because some of he defined noaion is inconsisen wih comparable life insurance reserve
More informationGraduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model
Graduae Macro Theory II: Noes on Neoclassical Growh Model Eric Sims Universiy of Nore Dame Spring 2011 1 Basic Neoclassical Growh Model The economy is populaed by a large number of infiniely lived agens.
More informationAnalyzing Surplus Appropriation Schemes in Participating Life Insurance from the Insurer s and the Policyholder s Perspective
Analyzing Surplus Appropriaion Schemes in Paricipaing Life Insurance from he Insurer s and he Policyholder s Perspecive Alexander Bohner, Nadine Gazer Working Paper Chair for Insurance Economics FriedrichAlexanderUniversiy
More informationcooking trajectory boiling water B (t) microwave 0 2 4 6 8 101214161820 time t (mins)
Alligaor egg wih calculus We have a large alligaor egg jus ou of he fridge (1 ) which we need o hea o 9. Now here are wo accepable mehods for heaing alligaor eggs, one is o immerse hem in boiling waer
More informationEuropean option prices are a good sanity check when analysing bonds with exotic embedded options.
European opion prices are a good saniy check when analysing bonds wih exoic embedded opions. I s an old exam quesion. Arbiragefree economy where ZCB prices are driven 1D BM, i.e. dp (, T ) = r()p (,
More informationTHE FIRM'S INVESTMENT DECISION UNDER CERTAINTY: CAPITAL BUDGETING AND RANKING OF NEW INVESTMENT PROJECTS
VII. THE FIRM'S INVESTMENT DECISION UNDER CERTAINTY: CAPITAL BUDGETING AND RANKING OF NEW INVESTMENT PROJECTS The mos imporan decisions for a firm's managemen are is invesmen decisions. While i is surely
More informationPREMIUM INDEXING IN LIFELONG HEALTH INSURANCE
Far Eas Journal of Mahemaical Sciences (FJMS 203 Pushpa Publishing House, Allahabad, India Published Online: Sepember 203 Available online a hp://pphm.com/ournals/fms.hm Special Volume 203, Par IV, Pages
More informationPricing Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits under Stochastic Interest Rates
Pricing Guaraneed Minimum Wihdrawal Benefis under Sochasic Ineres Raes Jingjiang Peng 1, Kwai Sun Leung 2 and Yue Kuen Kwok 3 Deparmen of Mahemaics, Hong Kong Universiy of Science and echnology, Clear
More informationReturn Calculation of U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Indices
Reurn Calculaion of US Treasur Consan Mauri Indices Morningsar Mehodolog Paper Sepeber 30 008 008 Morningsar Inc All righs reserved The inforaion in his docuen is he proper of Morningsar Inc Reproducion
More informationThe Interaction of Guarantees, Surplus Distribution, and Asset Allocation in With Profit Life Insurance Policies
1 The Ineracion of Guaranees, Surplus Disribuion, and Asse Allocaion in Wih Profi Life Insurance Policies Alexander Kling * Insiu für Finanz und Akuarwissenschafen, Helmholzsr. 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany
More informationEfficient Risk Sharing with Limited Commitment and Hidden Storage
Efficien Risk Sharing wih Limied Commimen and Hidden Sorage Árpád Ábrahám and Sarola Laczó March 30, 2012 Absrac We exend he model of risk sharing wih limied commimen e.g. Kocherlakoa, 1996) by inroducing
More informationPRICING and STATIC REPLICATION of FX QUANTO OPTIONS
PRICING and STATIC REPLICATION of F QUANTO OPTIONS Fabio Mercurio Financial Models, Banca IMI 1 Inroducion 1.1 Noaion : he evaluaion ime. τ: he running ime. S τ : he price a ime τ in domesic currency of
More informationModeling VIX Futures and Pricing VIX Options in the Jump Diusion Modeling
Modeling VIX Fuures and Pricing VIX Opions in he Jump Diusion Modeling Faemeh Aramian Maseruppsas i maemaisk saisik Maser hesis in Mahemaical Saisics Maseruppsas 2014:2 Maemaisk saisik April 2014 www.mah.su.se
More informationOn the degrees of irreducible factors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials
ACTA ARITHMETICA LXII.4 (1992 On he degrees of irreducible facors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials by Arnold Adelberg (Grinnell, Ia. 1. Inroducion. In his paper, we generalize he curren resuls on
More informationBasic Life Insurance Mathematics. Ragnar Norberg
Basic Life Insurance Mahemaics Ragnar Norberg Version: Sepember 22 Conens 1 Inroducion 5 1.1 Banking versus insurance...................... 5 1.2 Moraliy............................... 7 1.3 Banking................................
More informationChapter 6: Business Valuation (Income Approach)
Chaper 6: Business Valuaion (Income Approach) Cash flow deerminaion is one of he mos criical elemens o a business valuaion. Everyhing may be secondary. If cash flow is high, hen he value is high; if he
More informationLIFE INSURANCE MATHEMATICS 2002
LIFE INSURANCE MATHEMATICS 22 Ragnar Norberg London School of Economics Absrac Since he pioneering days of Black, Meron and Scholes financial mahemaics has developed rapidly ino a flourishing area of science.
More informationThe yield curve, and spot and forward interest rates Moorad Choudhry
he yield curve, and spo and forward ineres raes Moorad Choudhry In his primer we consider he zerocoupon or spo ineres rae and he forward rae. We also look a he yield curve. Invesors consider a bond yield
More informationWorking Paper No. 482. Net Intergenerational Transfers from an Increase in Social Security Benefits
Working Paper No. 482 Ne Inergeneraional Transfers from an Increase in Social Securiy Benefis By Li Gan Texas A&M and NBER Guan Gong Shanghai Universiy of Finance and Economics Michael Hurd RAND Corporaion
More informationOptimal Longevity Hedging Strategy for Insurance. Companies Considering Basis Risk. Draft Submission to Longevity 10 Conference
Opimal Longeviy Hedging Sraegy for Insurance Companies Considering Basis Risk Draf Submission o Longeviy 10 Conference Sharon S. Yang Professor, Deparmen of Finance, Naional Cenral Universiy, Taiwan. Email:
More informationEconomics Honors Exam 2008 Solutions Question 5
Economics Honors Exam 2008 Soluions Quesion 5 (a) (2 poins) Oupu can be decomposed as Y = C + I + G. And we can solve for i by subsiuing in equaions given in he quesion, Y = C + I + G = c 0 + c Y D + I
More informationEntropy: From the Boltzmann equation to the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
Enropy: From he Bolzmann equaion o he Maxwell Bolzmann disribuion A formula o relae enropy o probabiliy Ofen i is a lo more useful o hink abou enropy in erms of he probabiliy wih which differen saes are
More information= r t dt + σ S,t db S t (19.1) with interest rates given by a mean reverting OrnsteinUhlenbeck or Vasicek process,
Chaper 19 The BlackScholesVasicek Model The BlackScholesVasicek model is given by a sandard imedependen BlackScholes model for he sock price process S, wih imedependen bu deerminisic volailiy σ
More information2.5 Life tables, force of mortality and standard life insurance products
Soluions 5 BS4a Acuarial Science Oford MT 212 33 2.5 Life ables, force of moraliy and sandard life insurance producs 1. (i) n m q represens he probabiliy of deah of a life currenly aged beween ages + n
More information17 Laplace transform. Solving linear ODE with piecewise continuous right hand sides
7 Laplace ransform. Solving linear ODE wih piecewise coninuous righ hand sides In his lecure I will show how o apply he Laplace ransform o he ODE Ly = f wih piecewise coninuous f. Definiion. A funcion
More informationI. Basic Concepts (Ch. 14)
(Ch. 14) A. Real vs. Financial Asses (Ch 1.2) Real asses (buildings, machinery, ec.) appear on he asse side of he balance shee. Financial asses (bonds, socks) appear on boh sides of he balance shee. Creaing
More informationTEMPORAL PATTERN IDENTIFICATION OF TIME SERIES DATA USING PATTERN WAVELETS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS
TEMPORAL PATTERN IDENTIFICATION OF TIME SERIES DATA USING PATTERN WAVELETS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS RICHARD J. POVINELLI AND XIN FENG Deparmen of Elecrical and Compuer Engineering Marquee Universiy, P.O.
More informationThe Uncertain Mortality Intensity Framework: Pricing and Hedging UnitLinked Life Insurance Contracts
The Uncerain Moraliy Inensiy Framework: Pricing and Hedging UniLinked Life Insurance Conracs Jing Li Alexander Szimayer Bonn Graduae School of Economics School of Economics Universiy of Bonn Universiy
More informationAs widely accepted performance measures in supply chain management practice, frequencybased service
MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Vol. 6, No., Winer 2004, pp. 53 72 issn 523464 eissn 5265498 04 060 0053 informs doi 0.287/msom.030.0029 2004 INFORMS On Measuring Supplier Performance Under
More informationLEASING VERSUSBUYING
LEASNG VERSUSBUYNG Conribued by James D. Blum and LeRoy D. Brooks Assisan Professors of Business Adminisraion Deparmen of Business Adminisraion Universiy of Delaware Newark, Delaware The auhors discuss
More informationDOES TRADING VOLUME INFLUENCE GARCH EFFECTS? SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE GREEK MARKET WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BANKING SECTOR
Invesmen Managemen and Financial Innovaions, Volume 4, Issue 3, 7 33 DOES TRADING VOLUME INFLUENCE GARCH EFFECTS? SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE GREEK MARKET WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BANKING SECTOR Ahanasios
More informationMultiprocessor SystemsonChips
Par of: Muliprocessor SysemsonChips Edied by: Ahmed Amine Jerraya and Wayne Wolf Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2005 2 Modeling Shared Resources Conex swiching implies overhead. On a processing elemen,
More informationCointegration: The Engle and Granger approach
Coinegraion: The Engle and Granger approach Inroducion Generally one would find mos of he economic variables o be nonsaionary I(1) variables. Hence, any equilibrium heories ha involve hese variables require
More informationFair Valuation and Risk Assessment of Dynamic Hybrid Products in Life Insurance: A Portfolio Consideration
Fair Valuaion and Risk ssessmen of Dynamic Hybrid Producs in ife Insurance: Porfolio Consideraion lexander Bohner, Nadine Gazer Working Paper Deparmen of Insurance Economics and Risk Managemen FriedrichlexanderUniversiy
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALGARY. Modeling of Currency Trading Markets and Pricing Their Derivatives in a Markov. Modulated Environment.
UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Modeling of Currency Trading Markes and Pricing Their Derivaives in a Markov Modulaed Environmen by Maksym Terychnyi A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL
More informationMortality Variance of the Present Value (PV) of Future Annuity Payments
Morali Variance of he Presen Value (PV) of Fuure Annui Pamens Frank Y. Kang, Ph.D. Research Anals a Frank Russell Compan Absrac The variance of he presen value of fuure annui pamens plas an imporan role
More informationNiche Market or Mass Market?
Niche Marke or Mass Marke? Maxim Ivanov y McMaser Universiy July 2009 Absrac The de niion of a niche or a mass marke is based on he ranking of wo variables: he monopoly price and he produc mean value.
More informationThe Impact of Surplus Distribution on the Risk Exposure of With Profit Life Insurance Policies Including Interest Rate Guarantees.
The Impac of Surplus Disribuion on he Risk Exposure of Wih Profi Life Insurance Policies Including Ineres Rae Guaranees Alexander Kling 1 Insiu für Finanz und Akuarwissenschafen, Helmholzsraße 22, 89081
More informationTHE DETERMINATION OF PORT FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE WITH GUARANTEED VOLUME USING OPTIONS PRICING MODEL
54 Journal of Marine Science and echnology, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 5460 (2005) HE DEERMINAION OF POR FACILIIES MANAGEMEN FEE WIH GUARANEED VOLUME USING OPIONS PRICING MODEL KeeKuo Chen Key words: buildandlease
More informationSupplementary Appendix for Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect RiskTaking?
Supplemenary Appendix for Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affec RiskTaking? Ulrike Malmendier UC Berkeley and NBER Sefan Nagel Sanford Universiy and NBER Sepember 2009 A. Deails on SCF
More informationInventory Planning with Forecast Updates: Approximate Solutions and Cost Error Bounds
OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 54, No. 6, November December 2006, pp. 1079 1097 issn 0030364X eissn 15265463 06 5406 1079 informs doi 10.1287/opre.1060.0338 2006 INFORMS Invenory Planning wih Forecas Updaes:
More informationStochastic Calculus, Week 10. Definitions and Notation. TermStructure Models & Interest Rate Derivatives
Sochasic Calculus, Week 10 TermSrucure Models & Ineres Rae Derivaives Topics: 1. Definiions and noaion for he ineres rae marke 2. Termsrucure models 3. Ineres rae derivaives Definiions and Noaion Zerocoupon
More informationThe option pricing framework
Chaper 2 The opion pricing framework The opion markes based on swap raes or he LIBOR have become he larges fixed income markes, and caps (floors) and swapions are he mos imporan derivaives wihin hese markes.
More informationNetwork Effects, Pricing Strategies, and Optimal Upgrade Time in Software Provision.
Nework Effecs, Pricing Sraegies, and Opimal Upgrade Time in Sofware Provision. YiNung Yang* Deparmen of Economics Uah Sae Universiy Logan, UT 84322353 April 3, 995 (curren version Feb, 996) JEL codes:
More informationThis page intentionally left blank
This page inenionally lef blank MarkeValuaion Mehods in Life and Pension Insurance In classical life insurance mahemaics, he obligaions of he insurance company owards he policy holders were calculaed
More informationABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Term structure, duration, uncertain cash flow, variable rates of return JEL codes: C33, E43 1. INTRODUCTION
THE VALUATION AND HEDGING OF VARIABLE RATE SAVINGS ACCOUNTS BY FRANK DE JONG 1 AND JACCO WIELHOUWER ABSTRACT Variable rae savings accouns have wo main feaures. The ineres rae paid on he accoun is variable
More information