POZNAŃ AND WIELKOPOLSKA REGION INTERMODAL CONDITIONS

Transcription

1 POZNAŃ AND WIELKOPOLSKA REGION INTERMODAL CONDITIONS Instytut Logistyki i Magazynowania Marcin Foltyński 1

2 AGENDA LOGISTICS CENTERS INTERMODAL TERMINALS MAJOR COMPANIES MAIN DIRECTIONS SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS 2

3 LOGISTICS CENTERS IN POLAND There are three logistic centres in Poland that meet Western European standards. Their location resulted from local initiatives only, and their development was not supported by the state in a systematic way. That s why their organisations and levels of development and availability of basic logistic infrastructure components much differ. Śląskie Centrum Logistyki S.A. w Gliwicach, Euroterminal Sławków Sp. z o.o., Centrum Logistyczno Inwestycyjne Poznań (CLIP Logistics Sp. z o.o.). The existing centres neither cooperate with each other, nor undertake initiatives fort development of the national intermodal logistic network. 3

4 LOGISTICS CENTERS IN POLAND Existing logistic centres Most advanced plans of logistic centre development Plans with no implementation structure International transportation corridors: Source: Own study map: 4

5 LOGISTICS CENTERS IN WLKP REGION 5

6 CLIP CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ CLIP Group is a developer and logistics operator of industrial - warehouse facility with a private railway siding and an intermodal container terminal. Parameter Warehouse 1 Warehouse 2 warehouse space [m 2 ] height of the hall at the highest point [m] 13,10 10,50 number of loading docks number of unloading gates at level "0" 3 3 number of unloading rail gates 3 0 Source: Own study map: 6

7 CLIP CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNO INWESTYCYJNE POZNAŃ 7

8 LOGISTICS CENTER POZNAŃ FRANOWO Logistics Center Poznań Franowo is planned at the 105 hectare site in south - east of Poznan. The plan is to create there throughout the Special Economic Zone, which will provide an incentive for potential investors. The planned location of the project creates favorable conditions for its operation - it adheres on one side to the express road Poznań - Katowice, on the other to the railway tracks of distribution transshipment station Poznań Franowo, where PKP Cargo is planning to build a container terminal. 8

9 LOGISTICS CENTER POZNAŃ FRANOWO 9

10 WIELKOPOLSKIE CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNE - KONIN Wielkopolskie Centrum Logistyczne (WCL) is a zone of intensive investment with infrastructure prepared for the logistics company profile, importers pursuing distribution throughout the country and platforms of supply of store chains. WCL is currently only a warehouse park but because of the planned further development of infrastructure and the projected growth of freight flows in the region, intermodal investment is considered, i.e. the construction of a container terminal. Konin 10

11 WIELKOPOLSKIE CENTRUM LOGISTYCZNE - KONIN 11

12 CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POLAND Gdynia Gdańsk Braniewo Szczecin Mława Kobylnica Poznań Swarzędz Kutno Warszawa Year 2005 Małaszewicze Frankfurt Gądki Gądki Number of container terminals Kąty Wrocławskie Gliwice Sosnowiec Łódź Dąbrowa Górnicza Sławków Kraków Pruszków Piotrków Brzeg Dolny 20 Trybunalski 23 Wrocław Radomsko Medyka Zamość Source: Own study map:

13 CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POLAND No Location Terminal owner 1. Gdynia BTC - Bałtycki Terminal Kontenerowy Sp. z o. o. 2. Gliwice Cargosped Sp. z o.o. 3. Kobylnica Cargosped Sp. z o.o. 4. Mława Cargosped Sp. z o.o. 5. Gądki Cargosped Sp. z o.o. 6. Warszawa Praga Cargosped Sp. z o.o. 7. Braniewo Cargosped Sp. z o.o 8. Swarzędz- Jasin Clip logistics Sp. z o. o. 9. Piotrków Trybunalski CTL Logistics Sp. z o. o. 10. Gliwice DB Schenker Rail Polska Sp. z o.o. 11. Szczecin DB Schenker Rail Polska Sp. z o.o. 12. Gdańsk DTC Gdańsk S.A. 13. Sławków Euroterminal Sławków Sp. z o.o. 14. Gdańsk Gdański Terminal Kontenerowy S.A. 15. Gdynia Gdynia Container Terminal S.A. 16. Brzeg Dolny PCC Intermodal S.A 13

14 CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POLAND No Location Terminal owner 17. Gliwice PCC Intermodal S.A 18. Frankfurt nad Odrą PCC Intermodal S.A 19. Kutno PCC Intermodal S.A 20. Małaszewicze PKP Cargo Centrum Logistyczne Małaszewicze Sp. z o.o. 21. Medyka-Żurawica PKP Cargo Centrum Logistyczne Medyka-Żurawica Sp. z o.o. 22. Dąbrowa Górnicza Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o 23. Gądki Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o 24. Pruszków Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o 25. Wrocław Polzug Intermodal Polska Sp. z o.o 26. Kąty Wrocławskie Schavemaker Poland Sp. z o. o. 27. Kraków Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o. 28. Łódź Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o. 29. Sosnowiec Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o. 30. Warszawa Spedcont Spedycja Polska Sp. z o.o. 31. Poznań ATC Rail 32. Radomsko ATC Rail 14

15 CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POZNAŃ AGLOMERATION 15

16 CONTAINER TERMINALS IN POZNAŃ AGLOMERATION Parameter Total area [m 2 ] Storage area [m 2 ] Daily handling capacity [ITU*] Number of tracks for reloading [pcs.] Length of tracks for reloading [m] Reloading equipment [pcs. x payload] CARGOSPED Sp. z o.o. (Gądki) POLZUG Sp. z o.o. (Gądki) CARGOSPED Sp. z o.o. (Kobylnica) CLIP Sp. z o.o. (Swarzędz) ATC Rail (Poznań) SPEDCONT Sp. z o.o. ** (Poznań) no data no data target no data no data x x x x x x mobile crane Q=45 t 6 mobile cranes Q=45 t each 1 mobile crane Q=45 t 1 mobile crane Q=45 t 2 moblie cranes Q=45 t each none * ITU - Eng. Intermodal Transport Unit (container, swap body, semitrailer appropriate for combined transport) ** Restrictions on transportation and location of the terminal right in the center cause that its status should be described as very limited or even closed 16

17 KOBYLNICA CARGOSPED 17

18 SWARZĘDZ CLIP 18

19 GĄDKI - CARGOSPED 19

20 GĄDKI - POLZUG 20

21 POZNAŃ ATC RAIL 21

22 POZNAŃ SPEDCONT 22

23 CONTAINER TERMINALS MAJOR COMPANIES 23

24 CONTAINER TERMINALS MAIN DIRECTIONS 24

25 CONTAINER TERMINALS MAIN PARAMETRIC EVALUATION NO. Assessment parameter Weight of parameter Swarzędz (CLIP) Parameter assessment Value Kobylnica (Cargosped) Parameter assessment Value Gądki (Polzug) Parameter assessment Value Gądki (Cargosped) Parameter assessment Value Poznań (ATC Rail) Parameter assessment Value 1 Extensive network of regular rail connections , ,5 0 2 Equipment 2 0,5 1 0, ,5 1 0,5 1 3 Capacity of the terminal 1 0,5 0, ,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 4 Connection with the national road network (access to highways, expressways, etc.) 1 0,5 0,5 0,5 0, ,5 0,5 5 Local impact on surroundings ,5 0,5 6 Potential for development ,5 1 7 The capacity to operate in complex structure of networks of other terminals ,5 1 8 The scope of offered extra services (warehousing, washing containers, repair, connection to the mains, etc.) ,5 1 0,5 1 0,5 1 0, Adjusting the connection grid to the relevant transport corridor - RBGC Subjective assessment of the possibility of establishing possible cooperation in the RBGC project , ,5 1 0, , ,5 1 POINTS TOTAL 7 6,5 16 7,5 7,5 25

26 CONCLUSIONS (1) increasing the attractiveness of the RBGC corridor requires integrated actions of individual logistics centers and container terminals to create a new product the service offered to the global flow of goods Poznań agglomeration area has a well developed point infrastructure designed to serve intermodal transport. Worth mentioning is a new container terminal open in 2011, belonging to Polzug Intermodal acting mainly as a hub for container traffic primarily from German sea ports the parametric analysis of facilities (intermodal terminal, logistics center) located in Poznań agglomeration has shown that the container terminal POLZUG in Gądki is recommended for further action within work package of the project Rail Baltica Growth Corridor 26

27 CONCLUSIONS (2) the analysis also showed a lack of coordination of activities related to planning, management and development of point intermodal infrastructure of the whole region. In this scope, close cooperation of representatives of regional authorities, intermodal operators and shippers is required provisions in trade agreements concluded between shippers, forwarders and intermodal operators prevented the complete identification of freight flows through the analyzed points. Detailed studies in this area require establishing close cooperation with individual shippers 27

28 Thank you for your attention! Marcin Foltyński MA 28