Lloyd s Register LNG Bunkering Infrastructure Survey 2014 The outlook of Ports on provision of LNG bunkering facilities Working together for a safer world
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
22 Responding Ports 4 North American ports 15 European ports 3 Asian ports 14% 18% North America Europe 68% Asia
22 Responding Ports Gothenburg Copenhagen Stockholm Frederikshavn Brunsbuettel Amsterdam Vancouver Los Angeles Long Beach New York Southampton Portsmouth Le Havre Zeebrugge Gijon Tenerife Singapore Busan Yokohama Hamburg Igoumenitsa Piraeus
22 Responding Ports Gothenburg Copenhagen Stockholm Frederikshavn Brunsbuettel Amsterdam Vancouver Los Angeles Long Beach New York Southampton Portsmouth Le Havre Zeebrugge Gijon Tenerife Singapore Busan Yokohama Hamburg Igoumenitsa 27% ECA 73% Non-ECA Piraeus
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
European Ports feel more in charge of making LNG as fuel happened than other Ports Q2. Do you see yourself (the port) to be a driver of change with regard to the use of LNG as a fuel? No 36% Yes 64% No 38% 2011 Survey Yes 62%
More than half responding Ports do have specific infrastructure plans for LNG bunkering No 41% Q3. At present, does your port already provide or have plans to provide LNG bunkering infrastructure for the purpose of short-sea / local shipping? Yes 59%
Ports start to work together on LNG bunkering No 45% Yes 55% 2011 Survey Yes 7% Q4. In July 2011, the International Association of Ports & Harbours (IAPH) launched a project to develop guidelines for LNG bunkering in ports, is your port participating in this project? No 93%
Lack of infrastructure will not stop Ports delivering gas as bunkering fuel Pipelines at berths 17% Other 17% Barge 33% Barge Q6. What type of bunkering facilities are currently provided / do you plan to provide in your Port for gas fuelled shipping? (not just deep sea) Road tanker 33% Road tanker Pipelines at berths Other
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
More Ports in Europe are ready for gas bunkering now By 2020, Gas will be available for global deep sea routes 5-10yrs 24% Q7. What is the expected timeframe for LNG bunkering operations to commence at your port? 0-5yrs 76% 0-5yrs 5-10yrs 10-20yrs beyond 20yrs
Gas bunker will be supplied by existing onshore gas terminal Q8: From where do you anticipate sourcing the LNG required for bunkering and in what volumes? Not known yet 27% Onshore gas terminal 73% Onshore gas terminal Not known yet
In short term, Ports will rely on 3 rd party gas infrastructure as bunkering will be delivered afloat or by trucks Q9. What kind of infrastructure are you planning to develop for LNG fuel supply to the port? Under consideration 29% Others 23% Barges 26% Trucks 16% Barges Trucks Pipelines Others Purpose: Infrastructure required for receiving gas fuel from pipeline, LNG ships, LNG trucks, etc. Pipelines 6% Under consideration
In longer term, Ports will have dedicated storage facilities for bunkering flexibility FSRU 5% Q9. What kind of infrastructure are you planning to develop for LNG fuel supply to the port? Under consideration 48% Land storage tanks 47% Land storage tanks Purpose: Infrastructure required for storage of gas fuel, such as LNG storage tank on shore, FSRU, etc. Under consideration FSRU
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
ECA Ports availability of LNG for short sea seems secured Average Proportion 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1.7% 13% 24% by 2015 by 2020 by 2025 Q10. What proportion of the total bunkering volume at your port do you expect to be LNG within the following periods?
Ports show willingness to get ready for bunkering deep sea gas fuelled shipping Neutral 14% Very Likely 32% Q1: Generally do you consider LNG as a bunker fuel is viable for deep-sea shipping within the next 3 10 years? Very Likely Likely 54% Likely Neutral Unlikely Very unlikely
Potential availability of LNG for deep sea shipping Average Proportion 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 1.7% by 2015 - short sea 12% by 2020 - short sea 1.4% by 2020 - deep sea 17% by 2025 and beyond - short sea 7% by 2025 and beyond - deep sea Q10. What proportion of the total bunkering volume at your port do you expect to be LNG within the following periods?
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
In 2011 ports contemplated a mix of LNG bunkering methods and locations number of ports 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 1 4 2 4 6 1 1 4 4 1 4 3 6 2 2 4 1 2 2 5 Mix of/other options Bunkering at general anchorage Ship relocated to bunkering berth or anchorage By fixed pipeline at berth By barge at berth 2011 survey: How is LNG bunkering operations PLANNED to be carried out for different ship types* at your port? * Containerships, Tankers and Bulk carriers are limited to sizes over 10,000DWT and passenger cruise and passenger Ro/Ro are limited to above 5,000GT 0 Container ships Oil tankers Dry bulk carriers Passenger cruise Passenger Ro- Ro ships
Barge is now the preferred method for LNG bunkering number of ports 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 3 3 4 15 4 5 4 4 2 2 2 1 3 3 4 3 12 13 14 14 3 6 4 9 1 3 4 7 Bunkering at general anchorage Ship relocated to bunkering berth or anchorage By fixed pipeline at berth By barge at berth Q13. How is LNG bunkering operations PLANNED to be carried out for different ship types* at your port? * Containerships, Tankers and Bulk carriers are limited to sizes over 10,000DWT and passenger cruise and passenger Ro/Ro are limited to above 5,000GT
No significant change for bunkering methods between Oil and LNG number of ports 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 3 2 1 18 5 5 4 2 5 2 15 3 2 3 1 2 17 16 15 4 5 5 4 3 1 2 11 10 Bunkering at general anchorage Ship relocated to bunkering berth or anchorage By fixed pipeline at berth Q12. How is OIL bunkering operations CURRENTLY carried out for different ship types* at your port? * Containerships, Tankers and Bulk carriers are limited to sizes over 10,000DWT and passenger cruise and passenger Ro/Ro are limited to above 5,000GT By barge at berth
There will be gas bunkering solutions for all ships in need no particular shiptype is best suited for gas number of ports 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 16 6 4 10 13 12 6 4 Q14. Which ship types do you consider best suited for LNG bunkering at your port and why? 0
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
Ports driving change are also making moves ahead of international regulations Local/state requirements International legislation Q15. What is your plan to regulate safety of gas bunkering operations at your port? Under Consideration 27% Local/state requirements 55% Under Consideration Q2: Ports see themselves as the driver for change International legislation 18% No 36% Yes 64%
There is clear awareness that port and land safety requirements need to be harmonised No 10% Yes 90% Q16. When establishing your safety standards and operational procedures for gas bunkering at your port, do you envisage having to collaborate or harmonise standards with Land Authorities?
Split opinion on how to regulate 3 rd party service providers Don't know yet 36% External regulations 41% Q18. How would the port intend to regulate the gas bunkering companies? Which standard would the port adopt? Developing Guidelines 23% External regulations Developing Guidelines Don't know yet
Flow Who Readiness Supply Regulations Methods Volume Drivers
Drivers for supplying LNG at Ports Competition Other competitive bunkering ports along the trade route Pricing Pricing of LNG fuel comparable to alternative fuel options Location Location of the port relative to an ECA Traffic Number of ship calls at the port Q11. What are the most important drivers for your port to provide LNG bunkers in terms of the port s commercial position? Infrastructure Provision of infrastructure and facilities for LNG bunkering LNG Demand Demand from ship owners or suppliers for LNG bunkering Public opinion Retain / develop a positive public perception of the port Port Significance Retain / attain the status of the port as a major bunker port
Economics (price differential / incentives) are the main factor to attract gas fuelled shipping to Ports Infrastructure 6% Security / Safety 9% Regulations / Procedures 6% Economics 32% Economics LNG availability Q17. What are the main factors that will help to attract the gas fuelled target fleet into your port? Location Service Quality Service Quality 9% Location 18% LNG availability 20% Security / Safety Infrastructure Regulations / Procedures
LNG infrastructure turns into Availability as the newly emerged key driver LNG Demand Location Pricing LNG Demand Availability Location 5 1 Q11. What are the most important drivers for your port to provide LNG bunkers in terms of the port s commercial position? Public opinion Port significance Traffic Pricing Competition Traffic 1 3 Infrastructure Competitive Public Opinion Port significance 2011 2014 3 3
Luis Benito Global Strategic Marketing Manager Business Development & Innovation T +44 (0)23 8024 9717 E luis.benito@lr.org Lloyd s Register Group Limited 4F Mountbatten House, 1 Grosvenor Square, Southampton SO15 2JU, UK Working together for a safer world Lloyd s Register and variants of it are trading names of Lloyd s Register Group Limited, its subsidiaries and affiliates. Copyright Lloyd s Register Group Limited. 2014. A member of the Lloyd s Register group.