Underground vs. Overhead Transmission and Distribution



Similar documents
How the National Grid System Operates. Chris Gorman Lead Account Executive Syracuse

Electric System Performance Review Trustees Briefing. April 2013

Treasure Valley Electric Plan - Community Advisory Committee

Washington DC Power Sector Overview

environment briefing02

The electrical energy produced at the gen

Governor s Two-Storm Panel: Distribution Infrastructure Hardening Options and Recommendations

Portland General Electric Company P.U.C. Oregon No. E-18 Original Sheet No. C-1 RULE C CONDITIONS GOVERNING CUSTOMER ATTACHMENT TO FACILITIES

Power products and systems. Intelligent solutions for power distribution Zone concept

Considering UNDERGROUND. tampaelectric.com

Potomac Electric Power Company. Comprehensive Reliability Plan. For. District of Columbia. Including

F.C. Chan General Manager, CLP Engineering Ltd., Hong Kong SAR, China

When power interruptions happen.

REPORT OF THE PUBLIC STAFF TO THE NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS TASK FORCE

ESB Networks Response. ERGEG Consultation. Voltage Quality Regulation in Europe

POWER QUALITY IN YOUR HOME

Weather-readiness assessment model for Utilities. Shy Muralidharan Global Product Manager Energy Solutions Schneider Electric

2014 ELECTRIC SYSTEM RELIABILITY REPORT CITY OF ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

Power System review W I L L I A M V. T O R R E A P R I L 1 0,

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA APPENDIX F

Electric Field Operations Organization

Emergency Restoration Plan (ERP) Components

INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEM PROTECTION. Hands-On Relay School 2012

PA PUC AERS & Metropolitan Edison Company Site Visit

HURRICANE SANDY One Year Later A LOOK BACK AT ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC S STORM RESTORATION EFFORTS

Treasure Valley Electrical Plan

Oncor Storm Restoration Questions/Answers

ECE 586b Course Project Report. Auto-Reclosing

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIO~t~ Docket No. DE 15-

Hyperlinks are Inactive

ANN Based Fault Classifier and Fault Locator for Double Circuit Transmission Line

IESO Supply Deliverability Guidelines

Vision 2050 An Asset Management Strategy. Jaclyn Cantler Manager, Transmission Planning, PHI

Improving Reliability for High-Profile Customers

This is a Master s degree level apprenticeship which includes academic learning combined workplace learning and training.

Utilization of Underground and Overhead Power Lines in the City of New York Prepared by:

Product brochure Multi Functional Switchgear PASS M kv Flexible and compact switchgear solutions for windfarms

Qualitative Analysis of Power Distribution Configurations for Data Centers

Medium Voltage (MV) & High Voltage (HV) Training Module 6. Date of the presentation

Earthing Guidance Notes

3. TYPES OF SERVICE AVAILABLE. 3.1 Scope

AMSC s Superconductor Cable Technologies for Electric Utilities

Backup Plan Examples. What s Your Backup Plan?

Comparison of GIS and AIS systems for urban supply networks

David Payne, P.E. Associate Director February 18, 2014

EFFICIENT ELECTRICAL ENERGY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION

FIXED CHARGE: This is a cost that goes towards making the service available, including

CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS AT POWER SUBSTATIONS

Electric Power Distribution

ES281 COMPANY-SPECIFIC APPENDICES TO ENA ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION G81 PART 1

Operation and Control Microgrid and Distributed Generation. Mohammad Shahidehpour Illinois Institute of Technology

CHUGACH ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Anchorage, Alaska. February 10, 2014

Fundamentals of Modern Electrical Substations Part 1: Mission of Electrical Substations and their Main Components

ENA Customer Guide to Electricity Supply

Assessment of the Technical Issues relating to Significant Amounts of EHV Underground Cable in the All-island Electricity Transmission System

DISTRIBUTION RELIABILITY USING RECLOSERS AND SECTIONALISERS

Equipment: Power Supply, DAI, Transformer (8341), Variable resistance (8311), Variable inductance (8321), Variable capacitance (8331)

Evaluation of Data Submitted in APPA s 2013 Distribution System Reliability & Operations Survey

Konti Skan Replacement of Cable 1

Pennsylvania Summer Reliability

Electric Power Systems An Overview. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas

SERVICE - GENERAL Residential, Commercial, Industrial

Requirements for the Attachment of Communication Cable Facilities on PPL Poles

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 16

Brochure Introducing HVDC

Agenda do Mini-Curso. Sérgio Yoshio Fujii. Ethan Boardman.

Electrical Considerations for HVDC Transmission Lines. Joe Mooney, PE

OPERATIONS CAPITAL. The Operations Capital program for the test years is divided into two categories:

Operating Security Standards

Network Consulting for Power Grid Optimization

UE Project N Assessment and applicability of the global risk assessment tool. Hanne Vefsnmo, SINTEF Energy Research

Summary of Electric Transmission Assessment Report

A Changing Map. Four Decades of Service Restoration at Alabama Power. By G. Larry Clark

AC vs DC for Data Centers and Network Rooms

The calm after the storm

How To Manage Vegetation

Chapter 1. Network Structures

INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICE TRANSFORMER & METERING INSTALLATION SPECIFICATION

28 th Revision of Sheet No. 58 Canceling 27 th Revision WN U-60 of Sheet No. 58

VII. Restoration Costs

Services. Three Phase Service

Storm Ready. 3 Gulf Power Ready for the storm. 4 Be prepared, be safe. 5 Getting the lights back on. 6 Damage to your home s service connection

Hendrix Spacer Cable

Living with Electricity Easements

RELIABILITY OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS: BURIED FIBER OPTIC CABLE OPTICAL GROUNDWIRE CABLE ALL DIELECTRIC, SELF SUPPORTING CABLE

Cost Benefit Methodology for Optimal Design of Offshore Transmission Systems

National Science Foundation Funds Request

Transmission Network Performance Report

PV (photovoltaic) Basics There are generally two types of PV systems. The first and easiest (though the least flexible) is a grid tie system where

Industrial Ethernet How to Keep Your Network Up and Running A Beginner s Guide to Redundancy Standards

Estimation of electrical losses in Network Rail Electrification Systems

Reliability centered asset management tool

By Manitoba Hydro, March 4 th 2013

HVDC 2000 a new generation of high-voltage DC converter stations

GUIDELINES FOR UTILITY INSTALLATIONS Part 1 - Wire Lines and Communications Cables

QUALITY CONTROL Prepared: V. van Gastel / team TenneT Reviewed: M. Müller Approved: F. Wester BACKGROUND MATERIAL...

Last revised: September 1, 2014 TRANSMISSION FUNCTION TITLES AND JOB DESCRIPTIONS

New standardized approach to arc flash protection

CenterPoint Energy responds to frequently asked questions

Transcription:

electric power engineering Underground vs. Overhead Transmission and Distribution Your Power System Specialists June 9, 2009 1

NATIONAL TRENDS Municipalities have passed laws requiring new distribution facilities to be placed underground. For aesthetic reasons To increase property values (5-10% according to some studies) Cost covered by developers and ultimately paid by property owners. Provide better protection from storm damage and improve reliability of power supply. 2

Underground Construction and Storm Protection Underground construction CAN improve the reliability of the electric power system by minimizing damage to the system from: High winds Ice and snow storms Falling trees If part of the system is impervious to storm caused damage faster restoration of the system is possible. 3

Underground Construction is NOT Immune from All Storm Damage Flooding Hurricane Damage Earthquake Damage Lightning Damage Rodent and Human Damage (dig up) 4

Power System Components Transmission System 69,000 Volts and Above Less than 2% of all outages are due to transmission system outages. Subtransmission System 35,000 Volts Sometimes 69,000 Volts 5

Power System Components Distribution System 25,000 Volts and below Most outages occur here 6

Physical Limitations of Underground Lines The main argument against constructing underground systems is usually financial. But costs are not the only limitation. The laws of physics limit how physically long a power line can be. These limits are relatively unimportant on overhead lines but will severely limit high voltage underground cable systems. The higher the voltage the shorter the line length must be. The limiting effects become very important at transmission voltages, especially 100,000 Volts and above. Limiting effects may also be important for subtransmission voltages, 69,000 Volts and 35,000 Volts. 7

Physical Limitations of Underground Transmission What is the limit? And Why? Lines 8

Physical Limitations: The Effect of Capacitance Capacitance causes current to flow even when no load is connected to the cable. This is called line charging current. Underground line capacitance for power cables is far higher than overhead line capacitance. Wires are closer to each other Wires are closer to the earth (within a few inches). Underground lines have 20-75 times the line charging current that an overhead line has (depending on line voltage). If a line is long enough the charging current could be equal to the total amount of current the line can carry. This will severely limit its ability to deliver power. 9

Widespread Underground Transmission Systems are Not Practical A typical 345,000V transmission line will be able to deliver no power when the line becomes about 26 miles long. The longest underground circuits at 230,000 or 345,000V are 20 miles long. Replacing overhead with underground lines will also change other characteristics of the line and connected power system. Resistance will go down (probably beneficial) Inductance (resistance to the flow of AC current) will also go down. Voltage regulation will become much more difficult. Line losses may increase and efficiency might become worse. Time to repair the line will be much longer, an unacceptable condition for a transmission line since outage times are limited. 10

Other Transmission Issues Widespread changes to underground cable in New Hampshire would cause power flow, voltage regulation, system stability, and other unforeseen changes over the whole NE grid. System studies will be needed to determine the effect of line characteristic changes. NERC requirements could produce hidden costs. Presently available switching devices (circuit breakers) may not be capable of switching long underground lines. Massive re-engineering engineering of the entire NE power grid may be needed. Underground transmission line construction may be 20 times the cost of overhead construction. (A $3 million/mile line becomes $60 million/mile.) 11

Other Issues Currently underground AC transmission is primarily used only where nothing else will do. River Crossings In dense urban areas Large road crossings Where aesthetic issues are paramount (national parks) Aspen, Colorado: Special tariffs were imposed on customers. A move to install underground transmission cables may require a conversion from AC to DC transmission. Long underground DC Transmission systems are possible. DC Transmission does not suffer from the same problems as AC. DC Transmission has its own additional costs, primarily converter stations. Studies would still be needed to determine the effects on the NE power grid of a widespread conversion to DC transmission. 12

How about 35kV Underground 35kV is becoming common. Subtransmission? Wind farms Some cities have installed 35kV underground distribution. HOWEVER: Problems are occurring. Ferroresonance problems Early switchgear and cable failures. Time to repair underground lines exceeds overhead lines and may offset any reliability advantage. Charging current switching limitations of available breakers/reclosers reclosers limit line length to less than 15 miles. 13

Distribution: 15kV and Below 80% of all outages occur on the distribution system. 15kV underground distribution is becoming very common for new lines. The number of outages due to underground distribution are far less than overhead distribution. An improvement of up to 10 times is possible when lines are placed underground. HOWEVER: Time to repair, outage duration, is much longer (up to 10 times longer) for radial distribution systems (the most common type). The two effects counterbalance each other and underground radial lines may be no more reliable than overhead lines. They will be impervious to widespread outages due to ice. Underground systems are harder to modify. 14

The Main Objection to Underground Distribution Lines Can Be Solved The distribution system can be changed from radial to looped. This greatly reduces outage time. Radial Distribution System 15

Looped Distribution System Using a looped distribution system can minimize outage duration time and still keep the advantage of infrequent outages inherent in underground construction. Installing spare conduit can also facilitate repair. Reliability indices SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI will nearly always improve when switching to this type of system. One type of looped distribution system. 16

Underground Distribution System Costs Underground distribution system costs vary greatly depending on conditions. Easements and indemnifications must be obtained from owners. Soil conditions can greatly affect costs. At times placing lines underground may simply not make sense. Overhead lines may have considerable life left. Repairing, patching, and restoration costs can vary greatly. A price of $3,500/customer is cited in many studies, and has been shown in practice, to be the average cost for converting to underground construction in a municipal distribution system where certain conditions apply. If it is done as a long term (many decade) project. If it is done in coordination with other projects like road repair. If it is done in conjunction with retiring old overhead lines. If the municipality passes ordinances making underground lines required for new construction and new costs are passed to homeowners. 17

Underground Distribution System Costs A price of $3,500 per customer would double the rate charged for electricity. Estimates from varying sources say rates would increase 110-150%. Rates may not return to near previous levels until the original investment is paid off (25-40 years). This estimate applies only to cases where underground conversion presents no unusual problems: municipal distribution systems which can be easily looped and where no unusual conditions apply. This estimate does not apply to placing 100% of the State s distribution system underground. The four utilities serving New Hampshire have provided information which indicates that the cost of a project to place 100% of the State s s distribution system underground would be in excess of $40,000.00 per customer. 18

Summary of Costs: Overhead vs. Underground Transmission: Underground may be 4-204 times Overhead. Subtransmission: : Underground may be 4-204 times Overhead. Distribution: Underground may be 2-102 times Overhead. New underground may be cheaper than overhead in special conditions and costs vary greatly from utility to utility and place to place. 19

Conclusion It will cost more to place lines underground than overhead. Underground lines are protected from some, but not all, types of storm damage. Replacing all the overhead lines in a state (transmission and distribution) with underground lines is probably not possible or desirable. It is highly impractical (and probably impossible) to place all AC transmission lines underground. Selective short underground installations are possible. 35kV subtransmission systems may be placed underground if less than approximately 15 miles, however other problems may occur. It may be beneficial to place 15kV distribution systems underground if the installation costs are acceptable and if the system can be configured as a looped system. 20

Q&A Keith Malmedal Ph.D. P.E, P.Eng. P.O. Box 1265 Arvada, CO 80001 303-431-7895 kmalmedal@neiengineering.com 21