Traffic Light Coordination - Impacts on mobility



Similar documents
CITEAIR II. Marco Cianfano. ATAC SpA Mobility Agency for the Municipality of Rome. Paris

ATAC SpA, the Rome Mobility Agency: issues from city sprawling, mobility and environment

Rome Mobility Agency: ITS for Large Events Management and the EU Stadium Project

TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY

Paola Cossu Massimo Marciani

Parking Management. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential

Green Mobility - an action plan for the way forward

PISA. Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione ambientale della Toscana (ARPAT)

ANALYSIS OF LAND USE AND MOBILITY SCENARIOS FOR THE REDUCTION OF TRANSPORT ENERGY IN THE URBAN AREA OF CATANIA

The Mobility Opportunity Improving urban transport to drive economic growth

Ideal Public Transport Fares

EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS (2004)

Results of DEMOCRITOS project The case study of GENOVA

Fleet management system as actuator for public transport priority

Transport planning in the Stockholm Region

Mobility management, a solution for urban congestion regarding EU best practices

Bringing research to deployment: Concrete implementation of Cooperative Systems. Kees den Hollander Copenhagen, March 6, 2012

Eliminating Gridlock Through Effective Travel Demand Management and Urban Mobility Strategies

European Strategy 2050 TEN-T Methodology: Italian TEN-T network proposal

URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING IN TEHRAN AND THE OUTCOME OF THE IMPLEMENTED BRT LINES

A Greener Transport System in Denmark. Environmentally Friendly and Energy Efficient Transport

Sustainable Mobility in Almada

Urban Transport Issues in Egypt

AF1 Urban Environmental Planning WP 5 Urban Transport

Roads Task Force - Technical Note 10 What is the capacity of the road network for private motorised traffic and how has this changed over time?

Ing. Andrea Normanno

Sustainable city development through smart urban planning

Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility

The challenge: tranform the Urban Mobility model to make Milano a more Livable city. Agency for Mobility, Environment, Territory - City of Milan

Sustainable transport in Stockholm. Gustaf Landahl City of Stockholm

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT CYCLING STRATEGY 29 February 2008

MILANO SUSTAINABLE URBAN PLAN (SUMP)

Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) and Automatic Vehicle Tracking System (AVTS) For Calgary Transit Buses

Investing in Smart Cities

Tailoring transport choices

Growth of Addis Ababa

Mobility Management for Companies

The Mersey Gateway Project

30 Years of Smart Growth

1 st RESOLUTE Workshop Florence

Freight Measures within Norwich s CIVITAS Project. Chris Mitchell, Norwich City Agency Manager, Norfolk County Council

Logistic Info for students and lecturers

Recommendations for regional cycling developments of Budapest metropolitan area

Evaluation of traffic control policy in disaster case. by using traffic simulation model

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

There e really is No Place Like Rome to experience great Opera! Tel: to discuss your break to the Eternal City!

2 Integrated planning. Chapter 2. Integrated Planning. 2.4 State highway categorisation and integrated planning

Urban Cable Propelled Transit Systems High Flying Solution to Urban Transport Problems?

Eco friendly Route Planning

REDUCING SERIOUS INJURIES AMONG CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS

Academic Reading sample task Identifying information

Mobility Management and the Urban Transport Problem

Feasibility of Car-Sharing Service in Hangzhou, China

Integrating mobility services through a B2B platform. e-monday, 20. Juli Steffen Schaefer, Siemens AG.

Lawson Outline Plan External Traffic Analysis Working Paper

Broderick Architects Mundaring Christian College, Parkerville Project Transport Assessment Report

Dr. Kamal Shoar, Head of Transport Planning Department

URBAN TRAFFIC CONTROL

Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe. Brest. Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat

PLANNING RAIL BASED TRANSIT FOR BETTER LIVING. S.K.GUPTA DIRECTOR(PROJECTS), Mumbai Metro Rail Corp. Ltd Mumbai

PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK DESIGN AND APPRAISAL A CASE STUDY OF PORTO

Influence of Various Restrictions on Speed-Flow Models

Bedford s Network Management Strategy ( ) November 2010

Transport and planning in France

TITLE A CTS FOR THE NEW ROME EXHIBITION

Managing the Transit Network A Primer on Key Concepts

GTA Cordon Count Program

How To Develop A Balanced Transport System In Devon

Planning and Analysis Tools of Transportation Demand and Investment Development of Formal Transportation Planning Process

References on tube and transport analysis

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

What are the physical characteristics of York? Why problems do you think there could be in York use map evidence.

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning. State Planning Policy state interest guideline. State transport infrastructure

Getting natiowide traffic and mobility monitoring from BigData

Transcription:

Consortium Meeting Madrid 2013 May, 8 th Traffic Light Coordination - Impacts on mobility Roma Servizi per la Mobilità S.r.l. Rome Mobility Agency Marco Cianfano

Key issue The context Mobility Planning in Rome Present vs Mid term scenario ICT Emissions: case study overview Traffic survey ICT on and off Preliminary Results

The context: Rome City of Rome Province of Rome Municipal Area 1.285 skm Population Metr. Area 4.300.000 City residents 2.900.000 Road Network km 5.000 Main road network km. 800 Vehicles 2.650.000 cars 1.890.000 2 wheels 600.000 goods delivery 160.000 Daily Trips 6.100.000 Peak-hour Trips 560.000

Management of the Mobility 5 concentric zones with increasing constraints Zone 5: Municipality Area 1285 km 2 Emission Check Blue Label (yearly all vehicles and PTWs) Zone 4: External Ring (GRA) 344 km 2 Tourist Coaches Regulation Zone 3: Green Belt 154 km 2 Pollution emergencies, Multi-modal nodes, Park&ride Zone 2: Rail Ring 48.4 km 2 Emission restrictions, Pay parking schemes Zone 1: LTZ 5.5 km 2 Stop to all vehicles (except permit holders) Pedestrian 0.5 km 2 Zero Emission Area (walking & electric)

Residents Workers Socio-economic Density Residents + Workers / ha) Rome Socio-Economic Structure

Rome Road Network

Transport Line Length n Km stops Metro 37 48 Tramway 39 188 Corridors 32 Urban Railway 58 47 Railways (2) 152 42 TOTAL 318 (2) In the Metropolitan area Rome Public Transport Network

METROPOLITAN AREA 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Public Transport Private vehicles PTW Pedestrian 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% OLD TOWN - CITY CENTRE Public Transport Private vehicles PTW Pedestrian 0% The Modal Shift in Rome

Transport Line Extensions: +32 km Metro lines Line B north to Casal Monastero Line B1 to Jonio Line C to San Giovanni +90km Corridors Rome PT Network MID TERM SCENARIO

The new modal shift morning peak hour ROME Present scenario (%) Mid term Scenario (%) Modal shift differences (%) Modal shift differences Vehicle 287.940 50,9 289.750 50,0-0,8 1.810 Motorbike 89.000 15,7 89.320 15,4-0,3 320 Public transport 155.760 27,6 166.530 28,8 +1,2 10.770 Feet 32.640 5,8 33.050 5,7% -0,1 410 Sum 565.340 100 578.650 100-13.310 Il numero di spostamenti dello scenario futuro tiene conto dell aumento previsto in termini di residenti nel Comune di Roma

CO2 Emission (tons/year) Present vs Short term scenario

Objectives and Rome case study ICT EMISSIONS Development of a methodology and tool to evaluate the impact of ICT measures on road transport emissions Type of ICT/ITS Traffic Management with particular regards to Traffic Lights Optimization

Rome case study - Overview Itinerary of 6,1 km Urban Road: 2000/4000 veh/h 23 TRAFFIC LIGHTS (under UTC system: plan selection scheme)

Rome case study - Survey 2013, April 9 th 2013, April 10 th 2013, April 11 th UTC ON - 6 hours/day - Morning Peak (7:30/9:30) - Afternoon Off peak (12:30/14:30) - Afternoon Peak (17:30/19:30) UTC OFF UTC ON - 2 vehicles with GPS and Engine/fuel monitor systems - Fiat Punto - Fiat Panda 1.3 MJ - Survey Numbers: - 67 trips - 410 travelled km

Rome case study Traffic flows 250 200 150 100 50 0 0.00 0.30 1.00 1.30 2.00 2.30 3.00 3.30 4.00 4.30 5.00 5.30 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 15.00 15.30 16.00 16.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.00 21.30 22.00 22.30 23.00 23.30 0.00 Number of Vehicles [veh/5 mins.] 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 CITY CENTRE 09/04/2013 10/04/2013 11/04/2013 Similar traffic level over the three days of survey, in both directions (city centre and GRA) 09/04/2013 10/04/2013 11/04/2013 0.00 0.30 1.00 1.30 2.00 2.30 3.00 3.30 4.00 4.30 5.00 5.30 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 15.00 15.30 16.00 16.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.00 21.30 22.00 22.30 23.00 23.30 0.00 Time of the Day Effects of UTC off can be read without considering traffic conditions GRA Time of the Day Number of Vehicles [veh/5 mins.]

Rome case study Preliminary results

Rome case study Preliminary results

Rome case study Preliminary results

Rome case study Preliminary results OFF ON Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h) Idle time (v < 3 km/h) No stops ICT 27.3 26.5 8.9 501.0 OFF 23.8 29.0 7.2 387.2 ON - UTC off - effects: + 30% N. Stops + 10% Avg Speed OFF ON - UTC off - effects: + 85% N. Stops + 35% Avg Speed Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h) Idle time (v < 3 km/h) No stops ICT 31.7 22,5 10,7 570.0 OFF 21.5 30.5 5.6 306.9 ON

Rome case study Preliminary results Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h) Idle time (v < 3 km/h) No stops ICT OFF ON 18.8 35.2 5.1 282 OFF 17.5 35.8 3.8 211 ON - UTC off - effects: + 33% N. Stops - 2% Avg Speed OFF ON - UTC off - effects: - 25% N. Stops - 2% Avg Speed Time (min) Avg Speed (km/h) Idle time (v < 3 km/h) No stops ICT 18.1 34.6 4.0 213 OFF 19.8 33.9 5.3 286 ON

ITS in Rome UTT (Urban Travel Times) CC 555 AA CC 555 AA PLATE RECOGNISED AND TIME RECORDED AT THE ENTRY SECTION Targa: CC 555 AA 14-apr-12 11:50:39 TRAVEL TIME 21 mins 9 secs PLATE RECOGNISED AND TIME RECORDED AT THE EXIT SECTION Targa: CC 555 AA 14-apr-12 12:11:48 Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

Via Appia UTT Sections Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

Via Appia UTT Sections 25 UTC ON 09/04/13 TUE UTC OFF 10/04/13 WED 20 UTC ON 11/04/13 THU AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes] 15 10 5 0 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 Time of the Day Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

Via Appia UTT Sections 25 UTC ON 09/04/13 TUE UTC OFF 10/04/13 WED 20 UTC ON 11/04/13 THU AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes] 15 10 5 0 Road works on the section that reduced carriageway from 2 lanes to 1 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 Time of the Day Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

Different traffic flow conditions on sections Different efficiency of UTC measures 25 09/04/13 10/04/13 20 11/04/13 Internal section: urban External section: suburban AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes] 15 10 5 0 256.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 09/04/13 Time of the Day 10/04/13 11/04/13 20 AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes] 15 10 5 0 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 Time of the Day Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

UTC measures - Effects on traffic Incidents events that produced heavy congestion on Rome s Ring Road (GRA) Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

UTC measures - Effects on traffic 25 UTC ON 09/04/13 TUE UTC OFF 10/04/13 WED UTC ON 11/04/13 THU 20 INCIDENTS 12/04/13 FRI AVERAGE TRAVEL TIME [minutes] 15 10 5 0 6.00 6.30 7.00 7.30 8.00 8.30 9.00 9.30 10.00 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 Time of the Day Roma Servizi per la Mobilità Madrid, 8 th -10 th May 2013

Rome case study Preliminary conclusions - Important effects on travel times and speed - Stop and go effect increases - More the traffic flow is high more the UTC effetcs is important (platoon effects??) - Fuel consumption???