IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2



Similar documents
Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

LBJ Freeway in Dallas

Bridge Type Selection

MEMORANDUM West Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tampa, Florida Phone (813) Fax (813)

KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT BRIDGE PRIMER

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

3.1 Historical Considerations

2015 ODOT Bridge Design Conference May 12, DeJong Rd Bridge High- Seismic Zone Case Study: Bridge Rehab vs. Replacement.

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

INCREASE OF DURABILITY AND LIFETIME OF EXISTING BRIDGES. PIARC TC 4.4 EXPERIENCE.

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

How to Design and Build a Fence/G traverse Bridge or Graffiti Project

Up-Down Construction Utilizing Steel Sheet Piles and Drilled Shaft Foundations

Emergency repair of Bridge B421

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

GEORGE J. CAMBOURAKIS, P.E., C. ENG. PRESIDENT & CHIEF STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Managing North Carolina's MSE Wall Assets through Design, Construction and Performance

I-676 (Vine Expressway) Bridge Reconstruction Project 22 nd - 18 th Streets Philadelphia, PA. PSPE Presentation, December 3, 2015

A Solid Foundation Solution for Homeowners. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.

Virginia Approach Spans

Design of Bridges. Introduction. 3 rd to 4 th July Lecture for SPIN Training at the University of Dar es Salaam

CITY OF TRAIL MEMORANDUM

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

BUTE Department of Construction Management and Technology

Chapter 22. Lump Sum Project Guidelines

3 Tappan Zee Bridge Rehabilitation Options

DRAFT MAINTAINING HOUSTON S STREETS REPAIR, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION. Using the Full Range of Tools for a Challenging Job

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

Sewer Rehabilitation Design Requirements

Designed and Engineered to Perform

Structure Design Manual

I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation

March 19, Ms. Jean McDonald CAP Management th Street, Suite 1010 Denver, Colorado 80202

Source: Port Mann Bridge Plans Unveiled Today, CBC News, February 4, 2009.

Design, Testing and Automated Monitoring of ACIP Piles in Residual Soils

MHD BRIDGE SECTION WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICES GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICE TABULATION SHEETS

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 6

REPAIR AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGES DAMAGED BY THE 2010 CHILE MAULE EARTHQUAKE

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Stone Arch Bridges of Washington County, MD

1,045 m length of the Deh Cho Bridge

Roadway Cost Per Centerline Mile Revised June 2014

Earth Retaining Structures

The demand for new roadway

SCHEMATIC AND PROJECT BUDGET APPROVAL EAST CAMPUS NURSING EDUCATION AND CLASSROOM

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section / Article Page

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:

Project Information. New Hope - Lambertville Toll Bridge - Pavement Rehabilitation & Approach Bridges Repairs -

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS

TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Value of Instrumentation Systems and Real-Time Monitoring: An Owner s Perspective

Structural Performance of Highway Bridges under Given Foundation Settlements

DUDERSTADT FOUNDATION & CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

2000 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida

Value Engineering vs. Alternate Designs in Bridge Bidding

APPENDIX C INLETS. The application and types of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

INSPECTION FINDINGS. for. Paragon Condominiums 2102 W 31 st Avenue Denver, Colorado. Inspection Date: August 8, Perfonned By: Drew Schneider

QUALIFICATION, SELECTION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS TO PERFORM WORK FOR DOT

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Public Information & Public Scoping Meeting

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GUIDELINE FOR

Structures Construction Pre-Work Checklist PRE-WORK SHEET FOR PROJECT MANAGERS

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

CHALLENGES AND INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION REPAIRS

Dallas-Fort Worth Area Major Transportation Projects

RHODE ISLAND TURNPIKE AND BRIDGE AUTHORITY NEWPORT/PELL BRIDGE APRIL 1, 2014 TEN YEAR RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT PLAN (IN 2013 DOLLARS)

National Archives and Record Administration

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Analysis of the Interstate 10 Twin Bridge s Collapse During Hurricane Katrina

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION & RIGHT-OF OF-WAY PERMIT

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Bruce Highway (Cooroy to Curra) Section A (Cooroy southern interchange to Sankeys Road)

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Mount Carmel Municipal Authority Wastewater Treatment Plant SBR Tank#1 Repair

Table of Contents. July

Ross River Suspension Bridge Ross River, Yukon. Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Chaudière Crossing Bridge Rehabilitation

CAPPELEN MEMORIAL BRIDGE REHABILITATION

Engineered, Time-Tested Foundation Repairs for Settlement in Residential and Light Commercial Structures. The Leading Edge.

LIMITED SCOPE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT REPORT

SECTION PUBLIC STORM UTILITY DRAINAGE PIPING

Culvert Rehabilitation A presentation by ms consultants, inc. engineers, architects, planners

LARGE DIAMETER PIPELINE INNOVATIVE FAST TRACKED REPAIR

ATLAS RESISTANCE Pier Foundation Systems

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE

Transcription:

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2 Location: Dallas, Texas Owner: Texas Department of Transportation Client: Ferrovial Agroman Construction Cost: $1 Billion Construction Completion Date: December, 2015 Project Description This Public, Private, Partnership Project (P3) involved the construction of 4 miles of a 6 lane wide depressed tollway from Rosser Road to SH 75 on the north side of Dallas, Texas located in a dense established freeway corridor, in a heavily built environment. JSE was the lead consultant for this complex interstate reconstruction project. 8 lanes of freeway, 4 to 6 lanes of frontage roads and one major interchange were reconstructed. JSE completed all design work in 20 months. This project was part of a the larger 17 mile LBJ Express project encompassing improvements along I-635 from Luna Road to Greenville Avenue, as well as on IH-35E between Loop 12 and Valwood Parkway. The LBJ Express combines the same number of general purpose lanes that exist today with continuous frontage roads and approximately 13 miles of new express managed toll lanes. Almost all of the construction on this project is challenging because of the confined space and heavy daytime traffic in the project vicinity. As well as substantially structured mainlines, the additions of toll roadways involves slip lanes, direct connector ramps, and connections to three full-blown expressways at already complex expressway to expressway interchanges.

Civil Design Highlights JSE provided the complete road design for 75 lane miles of managed toll lanes, freeway and frontage roads along with multiple cross streets, slip lanes and ramps. The design included many interchanges including the one complex interchange between IH-635 and the Dallas North Tollway (pictured to the right). As part of the reconstruction and addition of the managed lanes, a new drainage system consisting of over 50 miles of pipe was designed in conjunction with the detention ponds and water quality features. JSE also completed the hydraulic study for a major stream crossing. The results of this study provided the bridge sizing for the stream crossing. Another unique drainage feature was the design of two aqueducts carrying storm water over the depressed managed lanes. With the construction of this project, all traffic signals within the project limits were replaced, updated and connected to the new ITS system. JSE designed and detailed the components and signs associated with the new ITS system and it s connection to the larger LBJ Express project. Additionally, JSE performed the design and detailing of the new lighting system. All traffic signs throughout the project limits were replaced as part of the contract. One of the most challenging aspects of the road design was the maintenance of traffic plan. Complex traffic maintenance plans to meet the stringent contract criteria that all lanes must remain in service for the duration of the construction were developed in cooperation with the contractor. All lanes remained open while completing the 30 foot deep excavation down the center of the existing highway. Key JSE Individuals and their project involvement: Bob Gray, PE Overall Project Manager in charge of: road design, drainage design, traffic control plan, lighting & ITS.

Phil Kuntz, PE Quality Control and Quality Assurance Manager providing technical support on: road design, drainage design, traffic control plan, lighting & ITS. Structural Design Highlights JSE provided structural engineering services for the design of 46 bridges and 2 million square feet of various types of retaining walls. Several existing bridges were strengthened, widened or repaired. Four interior piers of a multi-level structure had to be moved to fit the new lane arrangement. The types of bridges designed on this project included steel beam and prestressed concrete bridges both in simple span arrangement and continuous arrangement. Most of the deck design also utilized partial depth prestressed deck panels to expedite construction. One of the more challenging portions or the project was the design of elevated lanes over the newly constructed depressed managed lanes. The deck for the elevated lanes was supported on beams and the adjacent embankment. JSE developed a solution that would allow differential movements between the elevated portions of deck and the adjacent portions of slab cast on grade. Due to the lengths of the straddle bents spanning the lower managed lanes, post-tensioning in these precast pier cap components was utilized in their design to minimize depth and provide a long term durable support system. Due to the soil conditions present in the project limits deep foundations were generally utilized. These deep foundations were typically drilled shafts. The drilled shafts were founded in rock and relied on a combination of skin friction and end bearing to achieve capacity. If geometry dictated, group effects were also considered in their design. This foundation type was selected based on the soil type (clays) and close proximity to rock. The retaining walls on the project included rock nail, MSE, cast-in-place and drilled shaft walls. At each retaining wall location a study was performed to determine what walls were feasible taking into account MOT constraints and limitations. Analyzing the economics of the wall alternates, JSE confirmed wall selection with

the contractor then proceeded to prepare the detailed final design of the wall. The project also had to integrate existing structures into the reconstruction. JSE performed load rating analysis on some of these structures and made recommendations for repairs and/or replacements. When the contractor elected to repair structures, JSE prepared detailed strengthening calculations and rehabilitation plans. These plans involved deck and beam replacement, strengthening of decks with carbon fiber reinforcing and deck overlays. Throughout the entire project corridor aesthetic criteria had to be maintained. JSE s bridge and retaining wall designs incorporated the overall aesthetic theme to maintain the architectural details that were promised to the local community. Additionally, all structures were outfit with the necessary components to carry electrical lines, intelligent transportation systems and accommodate sign services. Key JSE individuals and their project involvement: Javier Gauthier, PhD, PE, SE Overall Structures Project Manager in charge of: bridge design, retaining wall design & plan review. Brian Slagle, PE, SE Quality Control and Quality Assurance Manager providing technical support on: bridge design & retaining wall design. Demoliltion of Existing Structures Prior to various construction operations taking place, demolition of the existing structures in this project had to take place. JSE prepared the demolition analysis for the existing bridge structures to be removed. Working closely with the contractor, JSE developed and produced the controlled, staged removal demolition plans for all the structures. All of the existing structures were located in an urban environment and were adjacent to or crossed existing roads that were maintaining traffic. The types of superstructures supported on concrete piers and abutments that were demolished included: concrete deck supported on continuous steel beams, concrete deck supported on prestressed I-beam and bulb-tee beams, and continuous reinforced concrete spline structures. All of the bridge structures were elevated and tied into existing concrete works. Removal of the foundations commenced to the point where existing portions would not interfere with new work.

The analysis performed on some of the structures concluded that in order to maintain stability during demolition, temporary shoring would be required to support the structure. When this was the case, JSE either provided the anticipated shoring loads for use with standard towers or in unique cases, JSE designed a shoring system for the contractor to use. Another important consideration that was investigated in the demolition analysis was checking the capacity of the existing structures to support the construction loads from the demolition equipment to verify the structures could safely support the equipment during the staged removal. JSE considered not only the plan information, but looked at inspection reports to determine if additional consideration must be given to deteriorated components. In the event where traffic was maintained under structures that were being demolished, JSE designed protective sheeting to further ensure safety to the travelling public. Where feasible, the material from the demolished structures was incorporated in the new construction. Steel removed for the existing bridges was also used for some temporary works or sent to other projects where it could be recycled for future use. Key JSE Individuals and their project involvement: Javier Gauthier, PhD, PE, SE Structures Project Manager in charge of overseeing: structural modeling, demolition plan development & scheduling. Brian Slagle, PE, SE Quality Control and Quality Assurance Manager providing technical support on: structural modeling & demolition concepts / plans.