AEROSPACE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - 9100 Dale K. Gordon Rolls-Royce Royce North America Past Chairman Americas Aerospace Quality Group April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 1 of 24
Aerospace Quality Standards Numbering System International Standards - 91xx Are planned for harmonization across all 3 aerospace sectors and are recognized globally Americas Standards - 90xx Are published for use by AAQG, may become an 91XX standard at a later date AS Standards - Americas Published by Society of Automotive Engineers EN Standards - Europe published in Europe by AECMA JIS Q or Q SJAC is the Japan / Asia Equivalent April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 2 of 24
Aerospace Quality System Standards INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS 9100 - Quality System for Aerospace Manufacturers 9101 - Checksheet for 9100 9102 - First Article Inspection 9103 - Management of Key Characteristics 9110 - Quality System for Aerospace Repair Stations 9111 - Checksheet for 9110 9120 - Quality System for Pass-Through Distributors 9121 - Checksheet for 9120 April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 3 of 24
Aerospace Supply Chain Tier 1 Vehicle / Airframe / Propulsion Manufacture 9100 9003 9120 Tier 1 Tier 2 Integrators / Source Control/ Software Dev./ Major Assemblies Tier 3 - Integrators / Source Control / Specialty Electronics / Wiring / Compnts Tier 4 - Make to Print / Machine Shops/ Processors Tier 5 - Distributors (Fasteners, Raw Materials, Commodities, Adhesives, Special Materials) Tier 6 - Raw Materials (Castings, Forgings, Sheet, etc) Variation Reduction 9102 9103 Special Processes Company Specific or NADCAP April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 4 of 24
ISO TC20 - WG11 ISO Technical Committee 20 - Aircraft & Space Vehicles Established Working Group 11 (April 1997) Chartered to develop and publish an international quality system standard based upon ISO 9001 for the aerospace industry United States (Gene Barker) Convener Members: Brazil Germany United Kingdom China Japan United States France Mexico April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 5 of 24
International Quality System Standard Creation 1998 Americas Standard ISO 9001 1994 European Standard AS9000 pren 9000-1 World Aerospace Quality Standard ; AS/EN/JIS Q 9100 AS9100 ISO TC 20 EN 9100 WG11 April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 6 of 24
C o m p a n y R e q m n t s Aerospace Quality System Model Quality System Requirements - International Standard ISO 9001 Common Aerospace Quality System Requirements - International Requirements 9100 Program Specific Requirements Risk Mgnt Prgrm Mgnt Hardware Specific Requirements Special Process Process Rqmts Software Specific Requirements Deliver able Non- Deliver Service Specific Requirements MRO 9110 Dist. 9120 AS/EN/ JIS Q 9100 Int l Reqmnts & Company Reqmnts Internationally Agreed Implementation Processes April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 7 of 24
Why 9100? To standardize Aerospace quality expectations on a global level To achieve improvements in quality and reduce costs throughout the value stream ISO 9000 model for quality does not capture regulatory requirements or importance of safety, reliability or maintainability Captures aerospace supplements agreed to at an international level April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 8 of 24
ISO9001 versus AS9100 AS 9100 version is formatted to match ISO 9001:2000 and added requirements that provide for - Regulatory organizations interfaces Configuration Management Design and Development V& V., & V&V testing Control of changes in Production Process Control of production equipment, tools, NC machines Control of work in outside facilities Control of service operations First Article Inspection Inspection documentation These added requirements enables a standardized approach to supplier flow down requirements April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 9 of 24
Year 2000 ISO 9000 Revisions A moving target... April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 10 of 24
ISO 9001:2000 / 9100:2001 Timeline Note: AS9000 / AS9100 section 2 phase out December 15, 2003 Certificates are expected to expire in line with ISO 9001 requirements Does NOT mean that approvals are invalid 2000 2001 2002 2003 ISO 9001:1994 DEC. 2003 ISO 9001:2000 9100 : 1999 9100 : 2001 9100:2003? 9100A:2001 includes both ISO 9001:1994 and ISO 9001:2000 models until December 2003 April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 11 of 24
FAA Endorsement of AS9100:2001 The Aircraft Certification Service still believes that the effective implementation of AS9100 - Rev A will continue to enhance an organization s s overall performance. The statement found in Section 1.1 General: states It is emphasized that the quality management system requirements specified in the standard are complementary (not alternative) to the contractual and applicable law and regulatory requirements. is still a requirement that must be adhered to. April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 12 of 24
Current USA DoD Position Proposed Department of Defense (DoD( DoD) ) Adoption of the AS9100:2001 Quality Management Systems - Aerospace - Requirements (Nov. 2001) prepared... DoD adoption notice for the AS 9100:2001 to provide information for document visibility and facilitate document availability to DoD personnel. International Aerospace Quality Standard AS 9100, 2001 edition, Quality Management Systems-- --Aerospace Requirements, was adopted on March 1, 2002 for use by the Department of Defense (DoD). The standard specifies additional requirements identified by the aerospace industry specifically for an aerospace quality management system based on ISO 9001:2000 Quality Management Systems Requirements. April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 13 of 24
Current NASA Position on 9100 NASA issued Adoption notice on April 8th 2002, signed by Dr. Michael Greenfield, Associate Administrator for Mission and Safety Assurance. This notice makes AS9100A available for use by NASA for procurements for all programs. April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 14 of 24
SPACE CONSIDERATIONS ISO TC20 / SC14 and IAQG have on-going project to supplement 9100 w/ special considerations for Space needs Includes Risk Management & Safety and Mission Assurance emphasis Use as supplement to 9100 Consideration for full inclusion at next revision of 9100 Other industries / applications are considering using 9100 - Weapon systems and Nuclear energy industry April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 15 of 24
9100 Checklist - 9101 IAQG developed 9101 Common Checklist to be used by industry to cover all ISO 9001 & 9100 elements - allows industry to share audit information Must be used by Certification Bodies when performing 9100 audits Scoring feature is currently used by many organizations April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 16 of 24
9110 Repair Station Quality System Status of 9110 New version was developed with Manufacturers-MRO, MRO, DoD, FAA and Airline inputs Takes latest version of FAA Part 145 into account Will replace EN 9110 in Europe that is already in use since 1999 3 Airlines and most European Manufacturers already use it to specify requirements to MRO suppliers Registration / Certification plans being put in place April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 17 of 24
9110 Repair Station Quality System Why 9110? Manufacturers want a Quality System flow-down requirement for their repair activity Manufacturers want reputable suppliers that have repair station approvals and a defined quality system There is a need to put all of the expectations in one document for Repair and Maintenance organizations Military is very interested in having defined Quality System requirements for MRO April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 18 of 24
9120 Distributor Quality System EN 9120 developed and implemented in Europe for pass through stockists / distributors that handle parts and supplies that are used in aerospace products Checklist 9121 is also available Based on 9100, but only applies necessary system requirements. 9120 is available Registration plan to be available 1/2003 April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 19 of 24
SECTOR / IAQG PROJECTS Projects are Designed to reduce requirements variation Projects are designed to provide support and compliance enhancement to areas that Aerospace has identified for Risk Reduction (resource limitation) Projects are designed to increase process capabilities Projects are designed to improve products or processes April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 20 of 24
Aerospace Quality Standards (cont.) International Standards First Article Inspection (9102) Management of Key Characteristics (9103) Record Retention (9130) Nonconformance Documentation (9131) 2D Bar Coding (9132) Part Qualification Process (9133) Other Projects Less than 9100 (AS9003) Operator Self Verification (ARP) Deliverable Software Quality Non-Deliverable Software Direct Shipments (ARP 9004) Sampling Plans 3D Digital Data Storage (ARP) Contract Clauses (ARP) April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 21 of 24
Industry Leaders are Listening! Agreed to improve the overall approach to quality! Major Aerospace Companies have agreed upon Quality Management System approval approaches! A key objective is to reduce the number of audits! There are significant benefits to the Aerospace Industry! Working to develop our International processes to incorporate the new approach! International approach is based on a single agreed standard, harmonization of system application and shared information
Industry Acceptance / Usage The IAQG implementation metrics show that; 75+% of members have implemented 9100 internally and to their suppliers 25+% of members have implemented 9102, FAI, internally and to their suppliers. 10% of companies have implemented the recently published 9103, Component Proving, internally and to their suppliers. Implementation is gaining momentum and this will increase, particularly when the new Boeing Quality System is reissued. The sector implementation approaches are also making good progress but the benefits from global mutual recognition of Quality System audits is still not quite there yet - working the global database. April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 23 of 24
QUESTIONS April 11th, 2003 Edinburgh General Assembly 24 of 24