Performance of Flood Protection Systems



Similar documents
Flooding Hazards, Prediction & Human Intervention

Final. Contact person: Colin Whittemore Aurecon Centre 1 Century City Drive Waterford Precinct, Century City Cape Town, South Africa

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Outlet stabilization structure

Management of flooding downstream of dams

THE FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS TO THE CHAO PHRAYA RIVER

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Safety of Small/Rural Dams and Barrier Lake Management


Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Integrated Water and Sediment Management of Yellow River

THE 4 MAJOR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Flood mitigation program for Gatun lake. Programa de mitigación de inundaciones del lago Gatún

APPENDIX F. Baker County. Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. P Turbidity Monitoring Plan

ecmar SECTION INSTRUCTIONS: Sanitary Sewer Collection Systems

Technical Standards and Guidelines for Planning and Design DRAFT VOLUME FLOOD CONTROL

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

New Master s Program in Medical Informatics, ehealth and Telemedicine at Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Germany

Technical Approach and Methodology

Transboundary cooperation in the flood forecasting and warning service within the international Morava river basin

Global Flood Alert System (GFAS)

Development of Technical Data For Long Term Flood Solutions For the Red River Basin

The Isar Experience River Restoration in Middle Isar Reaches Uwe Kleber-Lerchbaumer Bavarian Environment Agency

The success of the hurricane protection around Chevron s refinery at Pascagoula, MS, during Katrina

A CASE-STUDY OF CUA_DAT CFRD IN VIETNAM

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Best Practice of Flood Hazard Map in Japan

11.4 Voluntary Purchase House Raising and Flood Proofing

Contents Small- to Mid-Size River Development Projects. Recent issues. 1.1 The rivers of Tokyo. Small- to Mid-Size River Development Projects

London Borough of Merton Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

Water Management in Cuba: Problems, Perspectives, Challenges and the Role of the Cuban Academy of Sciences

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

ESTIMATING THE COSTS OF EMERGENCY SERVICES DURING FLOOD EVENTS

The Alternatives of Flood Mitigation in The Downstream Area of Mun River Basin

NYSDEC Optional Additional Language Model Local Law for Flood Damage Prevention Optional Additional Language

The Dutch Delta Approach

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

PROPAGATION OF 2012 FLOOD WAVE THROUGH HPP SYSTEM ON THE RIVER DRAVA

NATURAL AND HUMAN INDUCED HAZARDS Vol. I - Case Studies of Natural Disasters - Chen Yong and Li Juan

A. Flood Management in Nevada

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project

...Eq(11.6) The energy loss in the jump is dependent on the two depths y 1 and y 2 3 = E =...Eq(11.7)

2013 Flood Recovery Framework

Levee Management Guidelines

FLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

USACE Dam Safety Program Current Approach & Methodology

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

Assessment of Impact of Hydropower Dams Reservoir Outflow on the Downstream River Flood Regime Nigeria s Experience

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

BINGHAMTON FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT

The correct answers are given below. Some talking points have been added for the teachers use.

An overview of Brazilian experience in organizing the flood management: an institutional and technical approach

CORUH RIVER DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Water in Africa: Hydro Pessimism or Hydro Optimism? Água em África: Hidro pessimismo ou Hidro optimismo

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

MANITOBA FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Project Justification and Benefits. Science Imagination Collaboration

How To Manage Wildlife And Wildlife Damages At Earthen Dams

Amherst Dam. Michael Juris - Village President Joe Behlen, P.E. WDNR Dam Safety Engineer Gerald Krueger, P.E. AECOM

The Mississippi River & Tributaries Project

BANGKOK FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA)

HOW TO FUND BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANS? Invest in IWRM - it pays back!

APPENDIX D INLET CAPACITY AND SPACING. The capacity and spacing design of storm drainage inlets are presented in detail in this Appendix.

Recommendations for future developments

PEER REVIEW PLAN JANUARY 2008 UPDATE

Basement Flood Risk Reduction City of Winnipeg. Charles Boulet

The Isar in Munich an urban river landscape adapts to the winds of change

Armenian State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Prepared by. Drew Davidge

Flood Mitigation and Management in Bangkok Metropolitan Area

Dirk Nyland - Chief Engineer BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure NRCan - CCIAD Presentation 9 September 2014

USGS StreamStats Web Application for Kentucky

Small Dam Repair The Stone Lake Dam Story. Joe Barron, P.E. SynTerra formerly the Fletcher Group, Inc. 148 River St. Suite 220 Greenville, S.C.

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

SIMPLIFIED INUNDATION MAPS FOR EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS. National Dam Safety Review Board Emergency Action Plan Workgroup

Town of Essex NE Lagoon. Service Area. Essex Plant. Service Area. Pumping Station No. 4. Wastewater Pumped To NE Lagoons (Treatment Plant No.

Stormwater Control Measures for Tokyo

Whitefish Bay Private Property Program. June 6 th, 2011 Village Board Meeting Presented by Joan B. Hawley, P.E.

Mandatory Weeping Tile Disconnection to Reduce the Impact of Basement Flooding

How To Recover From A Flood In Bundaberg

Burnt River Black River and Gull River Flood Contingency Plan

Quality Assurance Reviews of Hydraulic Models Developed for the Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation Program

This plan forms one part of a suite of Asset Management Plans that have been developed:

CLEARWATER DAM BLACK RIVER, MISSOURI MAJOR REHABILITATION STUDY

Best Management Practices for Coal Ash Storage Facilities

REVISED FLOOD MAPS CAUSE WARWICK TO RECONSIDER THE SAFETY OF ITS TREATMENT PLANT

Bridges & Culverts Condition by Quantity

THE UNIVERSITY OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO

USSD Workshop on Dam Break Analysis Applied to Tailings Dams

Transcription:

ENCORE-Workshop Augsburg 2015 March 27 Uwe Kleber-Lerchbaumer Bavarian Environment Agency 2013 June Flood Performance of Flood Protection Systems

Precipitation Records (2013 May 30 June 2) 96h Cumulative Precipitation (mm) 2013 May 30 June 2 Pegnitz Schrobenhausen 500 1000 a (Recurrence Interval) 0,002 0,001 a -1 (Incident Rate) Station D = 12h D = 24h D = 48h D = 72h D = 96h mm a mm a mm a mm a mm a Aschau-Stein RO 138 100± 225 100-200 277 100± 374 500-1000 406 500-1000 Kreuth-Glashütte MIE 117 50± 203 100-200 277 100-200 341 500± 375 500± Marktschellenberg BGL 125 20-50 181 50± 211 20± 260 50± 291 50-100 Balderschwang OA 72 5± 104 5± 166 10± 198 20± 205 10-20 Herrenchiemsee RO 77 10± 128 20-50 158 20± 204 50-100 224 50-100 Schrobenhausen ND 50 5-10 66 10-20 78 10± 122 50-100 137 100-200 Pegnitz BY 43 5± 63 20-50 76 20± 116 100-200 129 100-200 Colmberg-Binzwangen AN 45 10± 66 50± 78 20± 83 10-20 93 10-20 Sonnen PA 42 2± 72 20± 94 50-100 105 20± 127 50± Helmbrechts HO 28 1± 44 2± 56 2-5 70 5-10 83 10± Nürnberg N 45 500-1000 51 5± 63 5-10 77 10-20 94 20-50 Kreuth-Glashütte Aschau-Stein Precipitation (mm) and Statistical Recurrence Interval (a) for selected Precipitation Measuring Stations from 2013 May 30 until 2013 June 2 Database: LfU and DWD, Regionalisation: DWD-KOSTRA und PEN-LAWA Reference: Tab. 1-1 Bericht Junihochwasser 2013, LfU 2013

Discharge Peaks in regard with Recurrence and Alert Levels Recurrence (a) Alert Level Design Conditions Overload Conditions Paar Lower Isar Lower Danube Ilm Mangfall Tyrolian Ache Salzach/Saalach Discharge Peak Recurrences on s1st und 2nd Order Rivers in Bavaria (2013 June Flood) Reference: Abb. 2-2 Bericht Junihochwasser 2013, LfU 2013 Alert Levels on River Gauges in Bavaria (2013 June Flood) Reference: Abb. 2-1 Bericht Junihochwasser 2013, LfU 2013

Discharge Peaks in regard with Recurrence and Alert Levels Recurrence (a) Alert Level Design Conditions Overload Conditions Paar Lower Isar Lower Danube Ilm Mangfall Tyrolian Ache Salzach/Saalach Discharge Peak Recurrences on s1st und 2nd Order Rivers in Bavaria (2013 June Flood) Reference: Abb. 2-2 Bericht Junihochwasser 2013, LfU 2013 Alert Levels on River Gauges in Bavaria (2013 June Flood) Reference: Abb. 2-1 Bericht Junihochwasser 2013, LfU 2013

2013 June Flood Classification Floodmarks Passau: Historic City Hall 2013/06 +1289 cm Inn- Gauge: Ingling Donau- Gauge: Hofkirchen 6.800 m 3 /s 03.06.2013 3.500 m 3 /s 06.06.2013 6.700 m 3 /s 10.07.1954 2.950 m 3 /s 03.06.2013 6.600 m 3 /s 15.09.1899 2.680 m 3 /s 27.08.2005 4.050 m 3 /s 25.08.2005 3.320 m 3 /s 13.07.1954 3.457 m 3 /s 23.05.1999 6.800 m 3 /s HQ 100 3.150 m 3 /s 26.05.1999 4.100 m 3 /s HQ 100 2002/08 +1081 cm Donau- Gauge: Passau-Ilzstadt 10.060 m 3 /s 03.06.2013 9.100 m 3 /s 10.07.1954 7.970 m 3 /s 15.09.1899 5.740 m 3 /s 25.08.2005 5.423 m 3 /s 23.05.1999 Ilz- Gauge: Kalteneck 205 m 3 /s 03.06.2013 8.800 m 3 /s HQ 100 350 m 3 /s HQ 100

Flood Protection Systems operated by State of Bavaria Longitudinal Systems: Levees, Floodwalls and mobile Systems 1314,3 km Levees 76,9 km Floodwalls 3,0 km or 2950 m² mobile Floodwalls 196 pumping stations(shared responsibilities) 318 sluices(shared responsibilities) 410 mobile locks(shared responsibilities) Reservoirs: Dams and Flood Control Basins 26 Dams: 500,9 Mio. m³ Overall Storage Volume 1 Flood Storage Reservoir: 6,4 Mio. m³ Flood Retention Volume + 1400 km Reservoir Embankments operated by private Electricity Boards (est.) + 250 km Levees, Floodwall and mobile Systems operated by Municipalities (est.)

Flood Protection Systems operated by State of Bavaria Longitudinal Systems: Levees, Floodwalls and mobile Systems 1314,3 km Levees 76,9 km Floodwalls 3,0 km or 2950 m² mobile Floodwalls 196 pumping stations(shared responsibilities) 318 sluices(shared responsibilities) 410 mobile locks(shared responsibilities) Reservoirs: Dams and Flood Control Basins 26 Dams: 500,9 Mio. m³ Overall Storage Volume 1 Flood Storage Reservoir: 6,4 Mio. m³ Flood Retention Volume + 1400 km Reservoir Embankments operated by private Electricity Boards (est.) + 250 km Levees, Floodwall and mobile Systems operated by Municipalities (est.)

Status of Longitudinal Systems operated by State of Bavaria Annual Status Reports (internal) Part A: Display and Classification of Systems (annual) Part B: Stateof Systems (annual) Part C: Inspectionof Systems (periodical) Part D: Performance of Systems (occasionally) Issued: Bavarian Environment Agency (LfU), 1st edition 2009 References: Annual Database-Reports by Regional State Water Directions (WWA) National Codes and Guidelines (e.g.) Code: DIN 19712 (2013): Technical Flood Protection (Federation) Code of Practice: DWA 507-1 (2011): Levees (Federation) Code of Practice: BWK-M 6 (2005): Mobile Elements (Federation) Manual: LfU-LF (2011): Controlling and Inspection (Bavaria)

Database-System (Gewässeratlas Bayern)

Status of Longitudinal Systems operated by State of Bavaria Project and Construction Spefications Desgin Criteria (HQDesign): HQ100 + 15% Climate Change Surcharge Freeboard: 0,5-1,0 m min. (Levees, Mobile Elements) resp. 0,2 m min. (Floodwalls) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria P ( permanent ): HQ100-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 3) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria A ( accidental ): Crest-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 4) Material requirements Geotechnichal minimum values: grading, compacting, permeability, Cross section minimum values: crest, slope ratio, accessibilty, security bands,

Status of Longitudinal Systems operated by State of Bavaria Project and Construction Spefications Desgin Criteria (HQDesign): HQ100 + 15% Climate Change Surcharge Freeboard: 0,5-1,0 m min. (Levees, Mobile Elements) resp. 0,2 m min. (Floodwalls) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria P ( permanent ): HQ100-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 3) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria A ( accidental ): Crest-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 4) Material requirements Geotechnichal minimum values: grading, compacting, permeability, Cross section minimum values: crest, slope ratio, accessibilty, security bands,

Status of Longitudinal Systems operated by State of Bavaria Project and Construction Spefications Desgin Criteria (HQDesign): HQ100 + 15% Climate Change Surcharge Freeboard: 0,5-1,0 m min. (Levees, Mobile Elements) resp. 0,2 m min. (Floodwalls) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria P ( permanent ): HQ100-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 3) EC7-Stability Proof Criteria A ( accidental ): Crest-Waterlevel (equates to Alert Level 4) Material requirements Geotechnichal minimum values: grading, compacting, permeability, Cross section minimum values: crest, slope ratio, accessibilty, security bands, Flood Protection vs. Flood Risk Management (FRM) Lessons learned: Resilience for most vulnerable Flood Protection Systems required! Systemical components Techniques

State of Flood Protection Systems in Bavaria (AP2020-Balance) 1999 2013

State of Flood Protection Systems in Bavaria (AP2020-Balance)

Danube between Straubing-Vilshofen Parkstetten Straubing AP-Rehabs since 1998 Irlbach Pfelling Plattling Isar Deggendorf Facts: 1930s Levees: HQ30-Design (240 km Levees, 42 Pumping Stations, 285 km² Area, 30.000 Inhabitants) Treaty raftified by FRG and Bavaria: Navigation and FRM generally linked Advanced Packages partially realized since 1998 (120 Mio. EUR, Part 1&2, Part 3 in implementation) Investigation of Alternatives (EU-Study) published in 2012 Dec: River Training without Dams (Variant A) 2013 Feb 27 Bavarian State Gouvernement Decision: FRM realized based on Variant A, AP (Part 3) completed, both acellerated 2013 Jun: Aproval Process starts 2013 Jun 2: HQ100+ Flood Event Osterhofen

Performance of rehabilitated Levees (AP, Part 1&2)

Performance of non-rehabilitated Levees

1st Collapse (Auterwörth) Projected HQ100-Backward-Levee Levee non-rehabiltated Embankments alongside State Road effective Projected HQ30+Retention Reservoir 30 Mio. m³ 1st Levee-Collapse(June 2 11:55 a.m.)

1st Collapse (Auterwörth)

1st Collapse (Auterwörth)

1st Collapse (Auterwörth)

1st Collapse (Auterwörth)

1st Collapse (Auterwörth)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar) Levee reconstructed (Setbacks, AP-Part 2) Embankments alongside Interstate Freeway failed 70 Mio. m³ Levee non-rehabiltated 2nd Levee-Collapse(June 2 12:10 a.m.)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

2nd Collapse (Lower Isar)

Danube-Gauges Deggendorf and Hofkirchen, 01. - 15.06.2013 Deggendorf (WSA Regensburg) Hofkirchen (WSA Regensburg) upstream downstream

Thesis 2013 June Flood was classifiedmuchmorecriticalin comparisionwith precedingfloods in regard with aerial extension and intensity causesa total monetarydamageof approx. 1,3 Mrd. EUR (1),thus itwas regarded as most costly natural disaster in 2013 worldwide has affirmed flood protection systems realized until 1998 (AP-Part 1&2) would had cause more grave damages without those measures pointedout limitationsof technicalflood protectionand causedreflectionson FRM-Strategies to prevent damages by overload events as far as reasonable

Thesis 2013 June Flood was classifiedmuchmorecriticalin comparisionwith precedingfloods in regard with aerial extension and intensity causesa total monetarydamageof approx. 1,3 Mrd. EUR (1),thus itwas regarded as most costly natural disaster in 2013 worldwide has affirmed realised flood protection systems would had cause more grave damages without those measures pointedout limitationsof technicalflood protectionand causedreflectionson FRM-Strategies to prevent damages by overload events as far as reasonable Flood Storage Basins Defined overflow sections Overtopable cross-sections for system-relevant levees

Overtopable Cross-Sections Technologies Steel-Sheet-Walls: 150,5 km (31.12.2014) Cement-Bentonite-Slurry-Walls(MIP/DSM/FMI, single-phase): 135,4 km (31.12.2014) Diaphragm-Walls (double-phase): 4,6 km (31.12.2014) Bored-Pile-Walls: 0,8 km (31.12.2014)

Tyrolian Ache (Chiemsee-Delta)

Environmental Impacts

Further Informations Hochwasser 2013 Wasserwirtschaftlicher Bericht www.hnd.bayern.de/ereignisse/hw062013/ Junihochwasser2013_2014-02-26_2.pdf Aktionsprogramm 2020plus Bayerns Schutzstrategie http://www.stmuv.bayern.de/umwelt/ wasserwirtschaft/hochwasser/index.htm