Tutorial on QRA Rockfall hazard risk assessment. Andorra la Vella, E. Pyrenees



Similar documents
COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

AT&T Global Network Client for Windows Product Support Matrix January 29, 2015


State of the Art Paper 1 A framework for landslide risk assessment and management

CAPRA Software Gabriel Bernal ITEC SAS - ERN-AL Consortium

QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ACCIDENTS AT WORK IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY AND THE SEVESO II DIRECTIVE

APPENDIX H7: POOL SPREAD AREAS FOR INSTANTANEOUS TANK FAILURE

Experiment (13): Flow channel

Analysis One Code Desc. Transaction Amount. Fiscal Period

Rockfall mitigation using a new probabilistic technique in the Cavazzo lake area

Case 2:08-cv ABC-E Document 1-4 Filed 04/15/2008 Page 1 of 138. Exhibit 8

HISTORICAL FLOODS:

LANDSLIDE RISK MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS AND GUIDELINES AUSTRALIAN GEOMECHANICS SOCIETY SUB-COMMITTEE ON LANDSLIDE RISK MANAGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS

Keynote 2: What is Landslide Hazard? Inventory Maps, Uncertainty, and an Approach to Meeting Insurance Industry Needs

Enhanced Vessel Traffic Management System Booking Slots Available and Vessels Booked per Day From 12-JAN-2016 To 30-JUN-2017

Rockfall hazard and risk assessment: an example from a high promontory at the historical site of Monemvasia, Greece

SPCC Plan - Calculation Guidance

AP Physics - Chapter 8 Practice Test

Landslide Briefing to City Council April 28, 2014

HOMEOWNER S GUIDE. to LANDSLIDES. and MITIGATION RECOGNITION, PREVENTION, CONTROL, Compiled by Dr. Scott F. Burns Tessa M. Harden Carin J.

GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES OF LANDSLIDES CHARACTERISTICS MECHANISMS PREPARDNESS: BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER A LANDSLIDE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSIONS

Toma Danila Dragos. National Institute for Earth Physics Romania

Landslides & Mudflows

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE MEGACITY ISTANBUL WITH REMOTE SENSING

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria for Large Storage Dams

The correct answers are given below. Some talking points have been added for the teachers use.

Buildings Construction Procurement Strategy

momentum change per impact The average rate of change of momentum = Time interval between successive impacts 2m x 2l / x m x m x 2 / l P = l 2 P = l 3

ANATOMY OF A MUDSLIDE AND DAMAGE CAUSED BY HURRICANE IVAN

ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW BUSINESS

MATHEMATICS FOR ENGINEERING BASIC ALGEBRA

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Lecture 4: Streamflow and Stream Gauging

Flood damage assessment and estimation of flood resilience indexes

Multi-Hazard Analysis in Natural Risk Assessments

Current counter-measures and responses by CERTs

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report March 2015

COURSE INFORMATION SHEET

Earthquake Risk Modelling. Dr. Dirk Hollnack GeoRisks Research Group Munich Reinsurance Company

AP Physics C. Oscillations/SHM Review Packet

Counter measures against extremely rapid mass movements

PART 4: SITE INFORMATION

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Full Professor, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University

EXCEL-BASED TOOL FOR THE

Monitoring of Natural Hazards With the ImpactSentinel Alarming System An Intelligent Solution

Rockfall Attenuator System

FACT SHEET: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ACCIDENTS

CASE STUDY LANDSLIDE MONITORING

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

What Constitutes Algo Trading in the Stock Options Market? A discussion of Mishra, Daigler, & Holowczak

[see Figure 3 below] Ferrite tile walls and ceiling RF Absorber parcel walls and ceiling Removable floor section to make fully anechoic

Secure Messaging Challenge Technical Demonstration

Ashley Institute of Training Schedule of VET Tuition Fees 2015

ICOLD POSITION PAPER ON DAM SAFETY AND EARTHQUAKES

DEFINING RISK AND ITS ROLE IN DISASTER MANAGEMENT

Is there evidence for acute air pollution deaths in Southern California? S. Stanley Young. Steve Milloy

Scheduling Best Practices

Introduction to Bode Plot

HAZARD VULNERABILITY & RISK ASSESSMENT

Ch 8 Potential energy and Conservation of Energy. Question: 2, 3, 8, 9 Problems: 3, 9, 15, 21, 24, 25, 31, 32, 35, 41, 43, 47, 49, 53, 55, 63

CHECKLIST FOR DC SUBMISSION - CONVENTIONAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH OPEN SPACE PROVISION

Thyristor/Diode Modules M## 501 MCC MCD MDC

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

The earthquake source

ALGEBRA I (Common Core)

Risk D&D Rapid Prototype: Scenario Documentation and Analysis Tool

Training Pack. Key Performance Indicators - KPI s

Gary Belleville. Victoria, BC (250)

CALL VOLUME FORECASTING FOR SERVICE DESKS

8.1.3 General Design Guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used when designing inlets along a street section:

Crude-by-Rail: Regulatory Developments in Canada

Mobile Money Manager

KCC Event Brief: 2014 La Habra Earthquake

Flood damage survey after major flood in Norway 2013 cooperation between the insurance business and a government agency

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Media Planning. Marketing Communications 2002

The successful integration of 3D seismic into the mining process: Practical examples from Bowen Basin underground coal mines

PXE Event Prague 14 July Illiquid power markets, TA can it be used at all? Frank O. Brannvoll

Predicting Seismic Vulnerable Zones using GIS. Outline of the presentation. Objectives. Risk Mapping Overview Factor Maps. Three levels of Zonation

Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS): Rapid Damage Assessment

Contents. Specific and total risk. Definition of risk. How to express risk? Multi-hazard Risk Assessment. Risk types

Siting and settlement: The most important way to protect shelter from floods is to build in a place that is unlikely to be flooded.

Spain Economic Outlook. Rafael Doménech EUI-nomics 2015 Debating the Economic Conditions in the Euro Area and Beyond Firenze, 24th of April, 2015

How can we defend ourselves from the hazard of Nature in the modern society?

FERC Engineering Guidelines Risk-Informed Decision Making

The Decennial Pattern, the Presidential Cycle, Four- year Lows, and How They Affect the Stock Market Outlook for 2010

Kinetic Theory of Gases. Chapter 33. Kinetic Theory of Gases

Transcription:

Tutorial on QRA Rockfall hazard risk assessment. Andorra la Vella, E. Pyrenees Jordi Corominas Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences Civil Engineering School. Barcelona UPC

What is the problem? Location of Andorra la Vella (AV) Santa Coloma

What is the problem?

For QRA we need answers to the following questions Where the rockfall will take place? How often? How far will it travel? What magnitude (intensity) will it have? What are the potential damages?

Risk for properties (i.e. buildings) R(P) = P(L) x P(T:L) x P(S:T) x V(D) X C R(P): expected annual loss due to landsliding ( /yr) P(L): probability of occurrence of a landslide of a given magnitude P(T:L): probability of a landslide reaching the building level P(S:T): probability of the building being on the landslide path V(D): vulnerability of the building C: cost of the building the analysis must consider all landslide magnitudes and all the potentially affected buildings

Risk for persons (i.e. inside a house) Individual risk R(ILOL) = P(R) x P(T:R) x P(S:T) x P(T:P) x P(S:P) x V(D) R(ILOL): annual probability of loss of life P(R): probability of occurrence of a rockfall of a given magnitude P(T:R): probability of a rockfall reaching the house level P(S:T): probability of the house being on the rockfall path P(T:P): probability of the person being in the house P(S:P): probability of the person being in the rockfall path V(D): vulnerability of the person

Identification of rockfall sources

Definition of basin and associated talus slopes Spatial unit: basin

How often? P (R) Couloir of Couloir Couloir of Pica Couloir of of Couloir Coll Luixent of d'eres Passader Cirera Roques Blanques Couloir of Couloir Couloir of Boneta of Alzina Forat Negre Apr-2000 250 m Jan-1997 May-2001 Basora Mateu Dec-1983 Jan-1996 1974 Basera rock wall wedge Jan-1994 1968, 1984, other events between these years About ten events between 1956 and 1985 Several events before 1974 End of 1960-69 decade 1962 Rockfall of known age Rockfall with only an approximate age Plot of tree-ring sampling Ramenada Roc de Apr-1999 Between Jul-1998 and Jan-1999 Sant Vicens rock wall

Frequency (P R ) P R = 1/T R Estimated return Site period from: Historical record Forat Negre 5 Alzina couloir 15 Boneta and Cirera couloirs 10 Bassera Mateu > 25 Ramenada couloir 50 Coll d'eres couloir 25 Pica couloir 25 Frequency obtained at the base of the talus slopes

Preparing magnitude-frequency relation Location Location Percentage of block of different volumes 0,5 1 2,5 5 10 m 3 Forat Negre 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Alzina couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Boneta couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Cirera couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Basera Mateu 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Ramenada c. 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Coll d Eres c. 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Pica couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Pica talus 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Percentage of blocks of different volumes 1 1-5 >5 m 3 Forat Negre 83,5 15,97 0,51 Alzina couloir 83,5 15,97 0,51 Boneta couloir 83,5 15,97 0,51 Basera Mateu 83,5 15,97 0,51 Ramenada c. 83,5 15,97 0,51 Coll d Eres c. 83,5 15,97 0,51

Assessment of travel distance (P (T:R) ) Frequency obtained at the talus slope. Not necessary

Impact probabillity (P (S:T) ) and (P (S:P) ) P (S:T)1 = L E /L D P (S:T)2 = L B /L E

Impact probability on buildings Location Length talus (m) L D Impact probability Length buildings (m) L E Width of exposed flat (m) L B Forat Negre 180 180 10 Alzina couloir 150 70 10 Boneta couloir 190 140 10 Basera Mateu 310 28 10 Ramenada c. 130 20 10 Coll d Eres c. 120 120 10 L E L B L D Block size (m 3 ) L R Cubic root (m) 0,5 0.794 1 1 2.5 1.357 5 1.710 10 2.154

Vulnerability (V)

Case 2: one line of rockfall fences Rockfall fences: 6 m height 2000 KJ absorbed kinetic energy

Preparing magnitude-frequency relation Location Percentage of block of different volumes 0,5 1 2,5 5 10 m 3 Forat Negre 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Alzina couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Boneta couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Cirera couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Basera Mateu 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Ramenada c. 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Coll d Eres c. 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Pica couloir 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Pica talus 49,6 33,9 14,5 1,47 0,51 Case of Forat Negre basin

Individual risk of lost of life k ( ) P = P P P P P V (ILOL) (R) (T:R) (S:T) (T:P) (S:P) (D:T) i i i=1 Different block sizes will give different values of P (S:P) K is the number of block-size classes P (R), P (T:R) and P (S:P) depend on block size For P (T:P), two scenarios have been considered: The most exposed person: 20h/24h = 0.83 Average person: 14h/24h = 0.58

Assessment of travel distance (P (T:R) ) Numerical modelling

Rockfall fence efficiency: new (P (T:R) )