TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONTRACTING OF THE SERVICES FOR THE EVALUATIÓN OF THE PROJECT SUPPORTING THE THIRD PHASE OF THE RABAT PROCESS: THE DAKAR STRATEGY ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS. BACKGROUND FIIAPP is a fundain f he Sae public secr whse aciviies, characerised by he absence f prfi and he pursui f he general ineres, is framed in he field f inernainal cperain aimed a he insiuinal mdernisain, fr he refrm f Public Adminisrains and he aainmen f demcraic gvernance. Tha, in rder is fundainal purpses, he Fundain FIIAPP, in his capaciy as parner f he Cnsrium in charge f he managemen f his prjec and led by he Inernainal Cenre fr Migrain Plicy Develpmen (ICMPD), is respnsible fr he managemen f his final evaluain based n he parnership agreemen signed beween he w insiuins daed July 3rd, 3 and in accrdance wih he fulfilmen f heir bligains by FIIAPP as i appears cnained in he aricle 3.4 f he abve referred cnrac.. OBJECT I is he bjec f he cnrac, he prvisin f evaluain services analyse he execuin f he prjec in erms f he achievemen f he resuls f he prjec in line wih he bjecives f he prjec. 3. CONTRACTING AUTHORITY Accrding he Cnracing Manual f he FIIAPP, apprved by is Bard f Trusees, he cnracing auhriy will be, meeing he budge, and accrding he sipulain fifh c), he Direcr r he Secreary General, jinly and severally. 4. LEGAL SYSTEM AND COMPETENT JURISDICTION This curren cnrac has a privae characer, he civil cur rder being cmpeen hear dispues arising in is implemenain. Sill, he acs f preparain and award f he same will fllw he prcedures referred in he inernal cnracing Insrucins f he FIIAPP in applicain f aricle 3.3. b) f he Ryal Decree 3/ f Nvember 4h, by which he ex Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
Revised f he Law f Cnracs frm he Public Secr is apprved, as a public secr eniy, is legal naure and cnracs held. The presen Terms f Reference has a cnracual naure and cnains he deailed cndiins which he perfrmance f he cnrac shall be adjused. The ignrance f he presen cnrac, he cnrac, is annexed dcumens r insrucins r rules f any kind apprved by he Adminisrain ha can be applied in he implemenain f he agreemen shall n relieve he cnracr frm he bligain f cmpliance. 5. PROCEDURE AND FORM OF AWARD OF THE CONTRACT The prcedure and he award will be made accrding he Prcuremen Manual f he FIIAPP as well as he acual applicable prcuremen regulains fr Eurpean Unin exernal acins. 6. CAPACITY TO CONTRACT They shall be eligible fr he award f his cnrac eiher naural r legal persns, wih Spanish r freign nainaliy, wh have he full capaciy ac and wh are n falling in he prhibiins hire lised in paragraph f aricle 6 f he TRLCSP. Fr his purpse, shall ake in cnsiderain he rules cnained in chaper II f ile II f bk I f he TRLCSP. 7. BUDGET LINE The budge line fr his cnes is, eurs (, wih axes included). This figure represens he maximum budge, which will deermine he exclusin f any bid fr a higher amun. The budge fr he evaluain will cver all he css f he evaluain persn r eam f evaluars fr he effecive develpmen f he evaluain, including ravel, expenses relaing says and dies shif, ec. Any addiinal r supplemenary budge shall n be cnsidered. 8. DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES TO BE DEVELOPED. a. Main asks See Secins, 3, 4 & 5 f he aached dcumen: TERMS OF REFERENCE - FOR THE CONTRACTING OF THE SERVICES FOR THE EVALUATIÓN OF THE PROJECT SUPPORTING THE THIRD PHASE OF THE RABAT PROCESS: THE DAKAR STRATEGY - TECHNICAL CONDITIONS hereinafer referred as TECHNICAL CONDITIONS. b. Requiremens: See Secins 6, 7 & 8 f he TECHNICAL CONDITIONS. TRLCSP sands fr Tex Refundid de la Ley de Cnras del Secr Públic. Prjec implemened by Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin
9. THE DOCUMENTATION TO BE SUBMITTED IN THE PROPOSAL IS AS FOLLOWS: a. The CVs in English and a CV in French and in he Eurpass frma f he individual persn r f he members f he evaluain eam as well as heir jin wrking rack recrd. b. An execuive summary (Max pages) f he echnical and mehdlgical prpsiin ha be fllwed and a descripin f hw will be develped ha will include: a. An iniial array f evaluain b. A prpsal (Max pages) f he echniques f evaluain (cmbinain f mehds r mehdlgical riangulain);. CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION The evaluain f he prpsals will be made accrding he echnical ffer and he cndiins and infrmain cnained n he Secins 8 f he TECHNICAL CONDITIONS, accrding he able belw: THÉCNICAL ASPECTS Crieria Evaluain Mehd Maximum Scre Prfessinal Qualificains Technical Qualiy f he Prpsal Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Upgrade n he requiremens cnained n Secin 8 f he Technical Cndiins - Thrughness and clariy f he prpsed mehdlgy and is adapain he naure and he purpse f he evaluain.. Srengh f he saring pins: Knwledge f he bje be evaluaed. The abiliy analyse and ransfer infrmain in wriing in rder draw cnclusins and plicy recmmendains, encurage he simulain f reginal pliical newrks and he effrs f cllabrain n crss-brder iniiaives. Prven experience in carrying u research and plicy analysis as well as in he presenain f varius pins befre he pliical legislars; abiliy synhesize pinins ver plicies and prgrammes f relevance and inerpreain f acins and bes pracices fr is subsequen ranslain in recmmendains where may be refleced bh he research wrk, as he field r pliician wrk and, herefre, able be replicaed and exraplaed her Prjec implemened by 3 45
cunries r secrs... Cherence and qualiy f he prpsed mehdlgy: Adequacy f he hereical-mehdlgical apprach in relain he naure and bjecives f he evaluain. Validiy f he echniques and he prpsed mechanisms f riangulain.3 Incrprain f he mainsream appraches - Clariy f he evaluain marix and f he prpsal f perainalizain f i 5 5 Cherence amng he quesins, indicars, surces f verificain and he echniques included in he evaluain marix. Technical Qualiy f he mehdlgical elemens included in he marix 5 3- Organizain f he wrk Adjusmen f he prpsed calendar he envisaged aciviies Elemens fr an added value in relain he ffer, as fr example, he incrprain f inernal sysems f qualiy cnrl. 5 5 The evaluain f he prpsals will be made accrding he ecnmic and echnical ffer. Fr he valuain echnique, he maximum scre will be awarded, fr each f he crieria, he bes ffer in his regard. The res f suppliers will be a prprinal scre he bes. T apply he ecnmic valuain he assessmen f he al budge f each cmpany will be dne.. REGULATORY PROCEDURES The cnrac shall be gverned by: The clauses cnained in his specificain. The Manual f prcuremen f supplies and services f he FIIAPP. Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
The Prvisins f law 5/ f he Fundains and in he 337-5 RD f Nvember s. Ryal 3/ Legislaive Decree f 4 Nvember, which apprves he TRLCSP. The ignrance f he cnrac in any f is erms, f he dcumens annexed i, r insrucins, specificains r sandards f any kind dicaed by he FIIAPP which may have applicain in he execuin f he agreemen, shall n relieve he emplyer frm he bligain f cmpliance.. DURATION OF THE CONTRACT The cnrac will have a ime f durain frm is signaure unil he 3h f June 5. 3. SUBCONTRACTING The successful bidder will be liable befre he FIIAPP fr he perfrmance f he naural r legal persns ha are subcnraced, a all levels, including he qualiy f he service, delivery imes and cmplein, bligains in relain he reamen f daa and infrmain, as well as he fulfilmen by he usurced cmpany f heir scial and fiscal bligains. Thse aciviies subjec his agreemen ha need be subcnraced by he successful enderer shall be execued under he erms prvided fr in he aricles 7 and 8 3/ RD f he 4 h Nvember, which apprves he TRLCSP. 4. PROPERTY OF THE WORK DEVELOPED. The wrk carried u in any f secins will becme he prpery f FIIAPP. The successful enderer may n use fr hemselves r prvide hird paries any daa f he cnraced wrks, r publish, al r parially he cnens wihu he wrien permissin f he FIIAPP. In any case he successful enderer will be respnsible fr damages arising frm he breach f his bligain. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CONTRACT. The causes fr erminain f he cnrac are cnained in aricle 3 f he RD 3/ 4 Nvember which apprves he TRLCSP: a) Nn-cmpliance by any f he paries f he bligains described in he cnrac. b) The manifes lack f qualiy f he service prvided r n adap i he cndiins agreed in binding dcumens Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
c) The Declarain f inslvency in he erms ha describes by he law /3, f July 9 h, bankrupcy. d) Muual agreemen f he paries. e) Breach f he limiains in he field f usurcing. f) Obsrucin f he faculies f managemen and inspecin f FIIAPP 6. REGIME OF PAYMENT The successful bidder is eniled he paymen f he agreed price, under he cndiins laid dwn in he cnrac, crrespnding he wrk acually perfrmed and frmally received by he Fundain. 7. AWARD TERM AND FORMALIZATION The cnrac will be awarded he 9 h f January 5 a he laes. The dcumen f frmalizain f he cnrac shall be graned wihin a perid f ne week frm he award. 8. START OF THE ACTIVITY The fficial saring dae will be he fllwing day he cnrac frmalizain. 9. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Ineresed paries wh mee he requiremens defined in hese erms f reference can be sen is prpsal he fllwing e-mail address: inf@prcessusderaba.ne indicaing n he ile in he "subjec": "Final Evaluain Suppr Prjec Raba Prcess". Deadline fr receip f applicains: January 6 h, 5 a.h. Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE CONTRACTING OF THE SERVICES FOR THE EVALUATIÓN OF THE PROJECT SUPPORTING THE THIRD PHASE OF THE RABAT PROCESS: THE DAKAR STRATEGY TECHNICAL CONDITIONS Index. Backgrund and prjec descripin. Objecive f he Evaluain 3. Scpe f he evaluain: Quesins and evaluain crieria 4. Apprach and Mehdlgy 5. Deliverables and Schedule 6. Surces f infrmain 7. Srucure f he Evaluain Repr 8. Prfessinal Qualificains Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Raba Prcess The Raba Prcess was launched a he Eur-African Cnference n Migrain and Develpmen (July 6, Raba) fcusing n he managemen f migrary flws alng he Wesern migrary rue. I brugh geher 6 cunries f rigin, ransi and desinain, and was a significan sepping sne in building he framewrk f cperain alng his rue. Tw years laer, he Secnd Eur-African Cnference n Migrain and Develpmen, rganized in Paris in 8, cnfirmed he vialiy f he prcess and resuled in he adpin f an ambiius hree-year cperain prgramme. On Nvember 3rd, he Third Eur-African Miniserial Cnference n Migrain and Develpmen was held in Dakar, Senegal, cnslidaing he achievemens in he implemenain f he hree-year Paris Cperain Prgram, and adping a new sraegy fr he years -4 (he Dakar Sraegy). The bjecive f he Raba Prcess is creae a framewrk fr dialgue and cnsulain wihin which cncree, pracical iniiaives are implemened. The bjecive f he Prjec is suppr he implemenain f he hird phase f he Eur-African Dialgue n Migrain and Develpmen (Raba Prcess), he Dakar Sraegy, by prviding he parners wih an pen framewrk fr cnsulain, crdinain and cperain. The Raba Prcess Seering Cmmiee is inegraed by 5 Eurpean cunries (Spain, France, Ialy, Belgium and Prugal), 5 African Saes (Mrcc, Senegal, Burkina Fas, Equarial Guinea and Mali), he Eurpean Cmmissin and he ECOWAS Cmmissin (Ecnmic Cmmuniy f Wes African Saes) which mee n an ad hc basis. The Suppr Prjec he Raba Prcess The Prjec " Suppring he hird phase f he Raba Prcess: he Dakar Sraegy " is implemened by a cnsrium inegraed by he Inernainal Cenre fr Migrain Plicy Develpmen (ICMPD) wh leads i and he Fundación Inernacinal y para Iberamérica de Adminisración de Plíicas Públicas (FIIAPP). The Raba Prcess Suppr Prjec is financed % by he Eurpean Cmmissin (EC) wih a cnribuin f millin. I began n s January 3 and is freseen end n 3 June 5. The Suppr Prjec has hree specific bjecives:. Enabling parners acively paricipae in a cnsrucive dialgue n all migrain-relaed aspecs; Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
. Cnribuing he h bjecive f he Dakar Sraegy by prviding parners wih he ls crdinae heir acins hrugh he cllecin and exchange f infrmain and gd pracices; 3. Ensuring he successful implemenain f he Dakar Sraegy hrugh mniring f and echnical suppr envisaged iniiaives. The expeced resuls are he fllwing: a) The Raba Prcess remains an acive plafrm fr srucured and perainal dialgue n migrain issues, which reflecs is sae driven naure. b) African and Eurpean sakehlders acquire and share knwledge n migrary mvemens and beer crdinae heir migrain-relaed acins. c) Significan seps in meeing he pririy bjecives f he Dakar Sraegy are suppred and mnired. The main arge grups in he beneficiary cunries are he sae and he Reginal Ecnmic Cmmuniies auhriies wih respnsibiliies in he area f migrain, mbiliy, scial affairs, planning, brder managemen and rafficking in human beings. Represenaives mainly cme frm he fllwing insiuins: Minisry f Freign Affairs, Minisry f Inerir, Minisry f Labur, Minisry f Jusice, Minisries in charge f links wih he diaspra and migrain issues and Nainal agencies fr migrain and asylum issues. Nn-sae acrs acive in he area f migrain in Africa such as research cenres and nn-gvernmenal rganisains are als invlved. A newrk f nainal fcal pins fr each Member Sae inegraing he Raba Prcess is in place. Three ypes f aciviies are freseen be implemened in he framewrk f he prjec:. Aciviies suppring he dialgue prcess: hree hemaic meeings; Seering Cmmiee meeings; ne Senir Officials Meeing; develpmen f a Cmmunicain Sraegy; ne miniserial cnference.. Aciviies suppring crdinain, knwledge building and gd pracices: crdinain n he Dakar Sraegy bjecives; develpmen f guides n he use f migrain daa; visual represenain n he plafrm f he Ineracive Map n Migrain; esablishmen f fcal pins newrks; cninued mniring and infrmain gahering. 3. Operainal measures suppring he implemenain and cninued mniring f he Dakar Sraegy radmap, like he shr erm demand-driven echnical assisance. Fr mre infrmain n he Raba Prcess, please see: www.prcessusderaba.ne T base plicy cnsisency and crdinain n acquiring and sharing infrmain Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
. OBJECTIVE OF THE EVALUATION The bjecive f he evaluain is: T assess he perfrmance f he Suppr Prjec in achievemen f prjec resuls in line wih saed prjec bjecives. 3. SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION: EVALUATION CRITERIA AND GUIDING QUESTIONS The evaluain will cver he perid f he prjec frm January 3 unil December 4) and shuld answer he fllwing evaluain crieria: Relevance: The exen which he bjecives f a develpmen inervenin mee he beneficiaries requiremens, cunry needs, pririies and are cnsisen wih parners and dnrs plicies 3. Is he design f he prjec adequae in rder achieve he specific bjecives f he prjec? Has he idenificain f sakehlders and arge grups been apprpriae? Have bjecives been flexible and adaped changes in he cnex? Efficiency: The exen which upus and/r he desired effecs are achieved a a reasnable cs (funds, experise, ime, adminisraive css, ec.). Have cnribuins frm parner cunries' insiuins and gvernmens r reginal rganisains (e.g. ffices, expers, reprs), arge beneficiaries and her lcal paries been prvided as planned? Did any unplanned upus arise frm he aciviies s far? Effeciveness: The exen which he develpmen inervenin s bjecives were achieved. Hw acive is day he riginal dialgue prmed by he Prjec in he cnex f he enabling envirnmen (reginal prcesses, srenghened leadership and faciliaed infrmain exchange)? Wha have been he crdinain srenghs and weaknesses wih and beween is varius srucures (Seering Cmmiee, EC, Nainal Fcal Pins, Cnsrium)? Has he prjec's managemen srucure 4 been cnducive he achievemen f is expeced ucmes? 3 Rerspecively, he quesin f relevance fen becmes a quesin as wheher he bjecives f an inervenin r is design are sill apprpriae given changed circumsances. Prjec implemened by Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin
Have he planned benefis been delivered and received, as perceived by all key sakehlders? Have behaviural paerns changed in he beneficiary rganisains r grups a varius levels? Hw far have he changed insiuinal arrangemens prduced he planned imprvemens (e.g. in cmmunicains, abiliy generae new acins)? Susainabiliy: The prbabiliy f cninued lng-erm benefis. The exen which psiive impacs are likely las afer an inervenin has erminaed. T wha exen are he nainal auhriies embedded in he achievemen f cncree ucmes? Are he prjec sakehlders likely keep i alive nce he prjec funding ends (financial susainabiliy)? Have capaciies been creaed amng hem ensure his migh happen? Impac: Psiive and negaive effecs prduced by a develpmen inervenin, direcly r indirecly, inended r uninended and if hey are being maximized r minimized. Hw did he Suppr Prjec s apprach cnribue fsering he linkages beween cunries migrain plicies wards achieving he bjecives f he Dakar Sraegy? Wha is he exen which he prjec has been cnsisen and cheren wih he plicy and prgramme framewrk wihin which he prjec is placed? Have he main sakehlders f he prjec paricipaed acively in is aciviies and helped i achieve is expeced resuls? The fllwing addiinal crieria will be analysed: Visibiliy: assessmen f he prjec s sraegy and aciviies as regards visibiliy, infrmain and cmmunicain, he resuls bained and he impac achieved wih hese acins in bh he beneficiary cunries and he invlved Eurpean Unin cunries. Has he Raba Prcess effecively cmmunicaed is resuls and impacs? T wha exen have he prjec cmmunicain and visibiliy aciviies cnribued increase crdinain amng sakehlders (mainly Nainal Fcal Pins)? 4 This includes qualiy f day--day managemen: perainal wrk planning and implemenain; financial and persnnel managemen; he apprpriaeness and qualiy f he mniring and evaluain arrangemens amng hers. Prjec implemened by Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin
Paricipain: analysis f he ineracin amng he key sakehlders f he prjec and heir say n wrking prcedures and decisin-making. Have he main sakehlders f he prjec paricipaed acively in is aciviies and helped i achieve is expeced resuls? Has he prjec mehdlgy encuraged paricipain and wnership f prjec aciviies? Cherence: The exen which he inervenin lgic is nn-cnradicry/des n cnradic her inervenins wih similar bjecives. Has he Raba Prcess been cheren in is apprach? Have penial synergies beween his Prcess and her EU migrain relaed prcesses been deeced and explied? The evaluain eam will be asked develp specific indicars as well as means f verificain in rder suppr he measuremen f he evaluain quesins deailed abve. Mrever, he evaluain shuld als prvide key inpus address relevan curren pliical challenges n migrain, gvernance and develpmen by prviding infrmain and relevan recmmendains he sakehlders invlved fr enabling sraegic decisin-making n maximising he develpmen impac f migrain, and help deermine penial fllw-up acins. 4. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 5 The evaluain will fcus n bh he ucmes f he prjec and n is inernal managemen srucure and wrking prcedures. I will herefre examine he aciviies implemened during he prjec as well as is upus (websies, pliical agreemens r psiins emerging frm meeings, publicains, esablished cmmunicain framewrks, ec.). In clse cllabrain wih ICMPD, FIIAPP will ac as main inerlcur wih he exernal evaluain eam. The evaluain eam will fcus n he fllwing seps and prpse differen echniques and ls fr he cllecin f infrmain and is prcessing hrugh a deailed planning, such as: a) Prviding a fcus and srucure he evaluain prjec. Ex: Idenificain f key quesins (based n he nes indicaed in Par 4), crieria and infrmain needed fr his purpse. b) Desk research cllecing daa and analysing daa clleced in he field and frm her surces. 5 The exper eam will furher develp he specific ls and mehdlgies cnduc he exernal evaluain Prjec implemened by Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin
The evaluain eam will prpse differen echniques and ls fr he cllecin f infrmain and is prcessing hrugh a deailed planning, such as: Revisin f dcumens and surces f infrmain such as he fllwing prjec dcumens: gran cnrac, parnership agreemen, SOP, mid-erm repr, aciviies upus, ec. (see Par 7). On-line surveys 6 a sample f sakehlders (Members f he Cmié de Pilage, nainal fcal pins, paricipans meeings, beneficiaries frm he suppr prjec aciviies, ec.) gauge heir appreciain f prjec resuls. Inerviews wih key sakehlders invlved in he prjec. These inerviews will be dne msly via elephne and whenever pssible, face face. Sakehlders will include he Prjec Managers and Prjec Officers f he cnsrium insiuins, Eurpean Cmmissin saff, Members f he Cmié de Pilage, and nainal fcal pins amng hers. c) Prviding judgemens and recmmendains fllwing he analysis f evaluain crieria hrugh is guiding quesins. 5. DELIVERABLES AND SCHEDULE The evaluar will prduce he belw menined deliverables: Mehdlgy dcumen: insrumens fr infrmain gahering (inerview guides, quesinnaires fr surveys, wrkshp faciliain plans, ec.). Draf Evaluain Repr. Final Evaluain Repr. 6 Or quesinnaires wherever a sable nline cnnecin may n be guaraneed Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
Phases f he Prcess Aciviies EU cunri es (senir fficial s) African cunries (senir fficials) E C Seering Cmmiee Paricipans Weeks (5) Nainal Fcal Pins Technical Expers Preparary sudy phase Meeing wih evaluain seering grup Revisin f lieraure Prjec Implemenain eam Elabrain f mehdlgy dcumen (idenificain f key quesins/ planning/ revisin f dcumens) X Infrmain gahering and case sudy Online survey all sakehlders (r quesinnaires if unreliable inerne cnnecin) In-deph inerviews wih seleced sakehlders (max ) Repr wriing Sysemaisain f infrmain gahered and inpus generaed Nnsae acrs 6 February March April May Wriing f he repr (draf), including relevan recmmendains X Revisin and submissin f final repr X Wrkshps * Seleced cunries nly X Oupus 9 3 6 3 7 6 3 3 6 3 7 3 3 6 3 7 4 7 4 8 5 8 5 9 5 June 8 Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
6. SOURCES OF INFORMATION The dcumens and infrmain surces ha he evaluain eam will handle during he desk sudy phase are namely: Cnrac and prjec dcumens, including amendmens. Sandard perainal prcedures. Prgress and inerim reprs. Minues f Seering Cmmiee meeings. Minues f Cnsrium meeings. Dcumens (agenda, cncep ne and repr) f echnical meeings, seminars and wrkshps rganized. Raba sckaking exercise (). Finalised and draf infgraphics and sample email alers frm he i-map News Cenre prduced in he i-map aciviy. Finalised and draf migrain daa guides. Dcumens relaing echnical assisance aciviies. Pliical declarains, sraegies and acin plans/radmaps relevan he Raba Prcess and he suppr prjec. Websies, newsleers, audivisual maerial prduced. 7. STRUCTURE OF THE EVALUATION REPORT The Final Evaluain Repr will be prepared in accrdance wih he prcedures and he index scheme ha will be agreed amng he evaluar and he prjec s Cnsrium. Bh he Execuive Summary f he evaluain and deailed recmmendains shuld include cnribuins r suggesins fr imprvemens in he managemen srucure and prcesses. The Evaluain Final Repr shall n exceed 3 pages. The repr will be accmpanied by an execuive summary f a maximum 3 page lengh. I will be wrien in English. A leas, he repr will cnain he fllwing infrmain: Execuive Summary Mehdlgy Findings f he evaluain exercise: Presenain / discussin f daa and infrmain clleced during he evaluain prcess. This shuld refer he evaluain dimensins and quesins described abve. - Lessns Learned - Cnclusins and recmmendains - Annexes Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by
8. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS The evaluain eam will repr FIIAPP n a frequen basis. The evaluain eam mus cmply wih he fllwing crieria: Minimum 7 years experience in develpmen cperain. Be fully familiar wih he principles and mehds f wrk f he prjec cycle managemen. Knwledge f and experience in African cunries. Knwledge/experience n migrain prjecs Minimum 5 years experience in planning and cnducing evaluains. Knwledge f paricipary mehdlgies. Abiliy analyse and repr in wriing. Fluen in English and French. Prjec funded by he Eurpean Unin Prjec implemened by