INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Similar documents
Temporal and Spatial Patterns in Population Trends in California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus).

How to Fund Your 2013 Invasive Spartina Project?

Resource Management Accomplishments FY 2014

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

APPENDIX D ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN. South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project December 2007 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report 1750.

Life in the Bay Getting to know the Bay s plants and animals

Spartina densiflora Eradication in the San Francisco Estuary

SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT.

San Francisco Bay Ecotone Conservation and Management Decision Support System (DSS)

Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees

PRBO Conservation Science and the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

8.0 RECREATION, PUBLIC ACCESS, VISUAL RESOURCES AND PUBLIC HEALTH

Inventory of the Wildcat Creek Restoration Collection, No online items

LETTER OF INTENT Measure A is the ten-year half-cent general sales tax approved by the voters in November Measure A funds projects that:

Bowmanville Marsh Habitat Restoration and Public Access Project

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Case 1:15-at Document 2-3 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendants.

SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will invest $15 million for post-sandy cleanup and marsh restoration on Long Island

Coastal Monitoring Program for Salmon and Steelhead

Samuel Veloz, Nadav Nur, Leonardo Salas, Diana Stralberg, Dennis Jongsomjit, Julian Wood, Len Liu, Grant Ballard

Appendix B: Cost Estimates

Chapter 3. Alternatives

Salt Marsh Restoration Experience in San Francisco Bay

GULF COAST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: AN APPROACH TO ASSESS KEY DRIVERS OF ECOLOGICAL CHANGE IN GULF OF MEXICO ECOSYSTEMS AND SPECIES

Section 4: Regional Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Planning and Adaptive Management

Why Count Birds? (cont.)

An Introduction to the Sea Turtles of Virginia. Amber Knowles CBNERR-VA July 22, 2008

San Francisco Bay Margin Conservation Decision Support System (DSS)

New Jersey Field Office Relocation By Eric Schrading

Acton Quarry Extension. Halton Region June 11, 2014

Status of Restoration in Mississippi

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PART 3 ALVISO SLOUGH RESTORATION PROJECT $22M RESTORES BOATING BUT THREATENS THE ENVIRONMENT

Impacts of Sea-Level Rise on National Wildlife Refuges

The National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Program Student Opportunities

The North State: Implementing the California Water Action Plan February 24, 2014

NATURAL RESOURCE RESTORATION LESSON PLAN Fix It!

Pete Slovinsky, Coastal Geologist, Maine Dept. of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

How To Improve Water Quality In San Franisco Bay

Standardized Environmental Survey Protocols

Snapshots: Resilient Lands and Waters Initiative

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

PUZZLING PIPES. Grade Level: 4-6

Recommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions of Alberta

Subsidence Mitigation Through Rice Cultivation Research Project Goals:

Dawn Reis Ecological Studies.

Request for Proposals: Suisun Marsh Managed Wetlands BMP Water Quality Improvement Pilot Project Technical Support

Setline survey-based apportionment estimates

Year

Strategic Land Conservation in the Gulf of Mexico Region

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

The Colorado River Delta

PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Development of microhabitat suitability criteria for fry and juvenile salmonids of the Trinity River

A Functional Classification System for Marine Protected Areas in the United States

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

Where will data be collected? Specific Parameter Measurements. Funding required. Who would monitor and manage data? Partners.

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Design And Construction Of The South San Diego Bay Western Salt Pond Restoration Project Headwaters To Ocean Conference

9.0 PUBLIC HEALTH (MOSQUITO ABATEMENT)

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

List of Fields & Directions

Issues from the Phase II Report

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

Restoring America s Everglades Progress and Next Steps for Restoring a Treasured Landscape and Sustaining a Way of Life

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

New York Sea Grant Strategic Plan

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

UTILITIZATION OF ECOHYDROLOGIC MODELS IN FLOODPLAIN FISH PASSAGE AND HABITAT RESTORATION EVALUATION

The Greater Sage-Grouse:

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Introduction to Natural Resource Damage Assessment

Predicting the Spread of Invasive Plants in the Sierra Nevada with Climate Change

WESTERN SNOWY PLOVER NATURAL HISTORY AND POPULATION TRENDS

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

Photo by Jeff Thibodeau, Helios Land Design

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

FLOOD CONTROL (Zone 4 Lines A and E)

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Biologist Report. Delaware Estuary. Delaware and Philadelphia Counties

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

ADDENDUM TO THE DRAFT ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE OTAY TARPLANT

Ecological Mitigation Strategies

Advisory Council on the Environment Nature Conservation Subcommittee. Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor) in Hong Kong

Western Snowy Plover Numbers, Nesting Success, Fledging Success and Avian Predator Surveys in the San Francisco Bay, 2010.

Connecting Science and Management for Virginia s Tidal Wetlands. In this issue...

San Francisco Bay Area Master Birder (MB) Program

APPENDIX E SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY IRWM PLAN LETTERS OF SUPPORT FROM NON-AGENCY ORGANIZATIONS, COMMUNITY GROUPS, AND OTHERS

UNIT FIVE TURTLE CONSERVATION

$1.29 Million Awarded for Community-Based Projects to Improve Health of Long Island Sound

Jackson Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2157) Revised Study Plan 12: Northern Spotted Owl Surveys. Final Technical Report

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

Transcription:

2014 Annual Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: California Ridgway s Rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus) TE-807078-14.1 Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento October, 2014 Submitted by Point Blue Conservation Science Julian Wood, Megan Elrod Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954 Contact: jwood@pointblue.org INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The California Ridgway s Rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus; formerly California Clapper Rail and hereafter RIRA), is one of the most endangered species in California. The species is dependent on tidal wetlands, which have decreased over 75% from the historical extent in San Francisco Bay. A complete survey of the RIRA population and distribution within the San Francisco Bay Estuary began in 2005. In 2014, Point Blue Conservation Science (formerly PRBO) completed the tenth year of field work designed to improve Estuary-wide population estimates, determine trends in abundance, and identify important habitat and landscape features for the RIRA. Field work was performed in agreement with the State Coastal Conservancy s Invasive Spartina Project (ISP) and the Baywide survey effort was coordinated through the ISP. Collaboration with other partners conducting call-count surveys included Avocet Research Associates (ARA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This report summarizes Point Blue s California Ridgway s Rail surveys in 2014 under U.S. Fish and Wildlife service permit TE-807078-14. The summary numbers presented in this report are designed to describe our field effort and unique detections of RIRA. The raw total number of birds presented should not be interpreted as site-level or Baywide population estimates. Nor should the apparent differences among years be used to determine a trend. In addition, RIRA are notoriously difficult to detect, which results in many false zeroes in a given dataset, consequently impacting an attempt to tally RIRA numbers at different spatial

P a g e 1 scales. Therefore, to investigate RIRA trends in the Estuary, we encourage a thorough analysis, as Point Blue has demonstrated in our previous reports (Liu et al 2012). In previous years (2005-2011), Point Blue received funding to compile and analyze data from all agencies and organizations participating in standardized Baywide RIRA surveys. The final results from this collaborative project are detailed in Liu et al (2012). Beginning in 2012, Point Blue only received funding to conduct surveys and not to integrate and analyze data from multiple contributors. Point Blue has, however, entered in a collaborative agreement with the Inventory and Monitoring Program of the USFWS. An initial product was to analyze the previous paired survey effort (2012-13), investigating the use of the North American Secretive Marshbird Protocol (Conway 2011) in the Estuary. Those results were compiled in a report to the I&M Program (Wood et al 2014). Conclusions from those reports, and Point Blue s commitment to furthering a decade long dataset, is to encourage the need for monitoring, in order to efficiently obtain population estimates which inform adaptive management decisions that support robust RIRA populations in the Bay. No nests were incidentally discovered during surveys, nor were any Ridgway s Rails harmed or killed. METHODS Type A call-count surveys were conducted from 15 January 2014 to 4 April 2014. Point Blue surveyed 31 marsh sites in the Estuary; 18 sites were in San Pablo Bay, 7 sites in Central San Francisco Bay, and 6 sites in South San Francisco Bay (Table 1, Figures 1a-g). Sites were surveyed three times by experienced permitted biologists, using a point transect method with 10 minutes per survey station. Survey stations were located primarily at marsh edges, levees bordering and within marshes, boardwalks, and boat-accessible channels within the marsh. Stations were placed 200-400 m apart. Station locations (x, y coordinates) surveyed in 2014 are presented in Table 2. All RIRA, as well as California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicencis coturniculus), Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), and Sora (Porzana carolina), detected from a survey station were recorded along with the time, direction and distance from the survey station. The actual number of rails detected was recorded, or if the detection was not heard clearly because of confounding circumstances (e.g., distance from observer or environmental conditions) a range in number of rails (e.g., 1 to 2, 2 to 4) was recorded. Playback (up to 1 minute) of RIRA vocalizations (kek, clatter, and kekburr calls) were used to stimulate a response at minute six of the third survey only under certain conditions: If no RIRA were detected, incidentally or during a 10-minute survey, from a survey station (regardless of distance from observer) AND no RIRA were detected near that station (within 200 m) after the first two passive surveys. Third round playback surveys consisted of 5 minutes of passive listening, then 1 minute of playback (if no RIRA detected), followed by another 4 minutes of passive listening. Playback was immediately stopped by the observer upon hearing a RIRA. RIRA detected during transit between listening stations as well

P a g e 2 as before or after the 10-minute listening period were also recorded and summarized in this report. We summarized our 2014 data by selecting the survey visit with the greatest number of minimum unique RIRA detections, which also includes any unique detections made outside of the official 10-minute survey period. For example, if on the first visit to a marsh the observer recorded 10 to 12 individuals, on the second visit recorded 14 to 16, and on the third visit recorded 8 to 10, the second visit would be the highest count (14 16) and the lower number of the reported range (14) would be used as the site estimate. This is referred to as the highest minimum count for a given site. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Point Blue Conservation Science biologists documented RIRA at 30 marsh sites (Table 1). Effort was increased in 2014 from 2013 when only a minimum of sites were surveyed by Point Blue biologists, and therefore many sites are discussed in comparison to 2012 counts or to the last season in which the site was visited. Prior to 2013, the population had maintained a stable to upward trend following the dramatic drop between 2007 and 2008 (Liu et. al. 2012). The sites that were surveyed in 2013 suggested a slight overall decrease in RIRA, except for a few notable exceptions. 2014 showed a potential rebound in numbers. Most sites surveyed in 2014 had numbers comparable to 2012, when the RIRA trend was stable or slightly positive. San Pablo Bay China Camp State Park and the Gallinas Creek Complex Detections of RIRA continue to fluctuate annually at China Camp marsh. Beginning with a minimum of 11 detected in 2010, numbers grew to a high of 32 in 2012, a drop in 2013 down to 16, then back to 28 individuals in 2014. Gallinas Creek North (Hamilton South), has had 30 to 40 individuals since 2010, and remained within that range in 2014 at 37. McInnis Marsh, to the south, which has had between 40 and 50 RIRA since 2010, remained stable from 2013 and within the normal range in 2014, at 49 individuals. Santa Venetia Marsh alone is a small marsh parcel, but the stations also survey the lower reaches of Gallinas Creek, including an eastern section of McInnis Marsh. The survey from Santa Venetia stations added an additional 29 unique individuals in 2014 to the already robust numbers for the complex. Overall the Gallinas Creek Complex, including China Camp State Park to the south, continues to support some of the highest numbers of RIRA in the Bay.

P a g e 3 Petaluma River Complex A total of 62 RIRA were detected at sites surveyed in the Petaluma River complex, from Black John Slough to the north, to the southern section of the river mouth along Novato Creek. In the extensive ancient marsh complex, every marsh parcel is not surveyed annually by Point Blue; with a few exceptions, including Black John Slough North. While there has been a slight decrease since the high count of 16 in 2010, since then there have consistently been 10 to 13 individuals recorded. In 2014, 10 unique individuals were recorded at Black John Slough North. The Greenpoint Marshes, which includes centennial and restored marsh sections, were not surveyed in 2013, but in 2011 and 2012 a total of 22 individuals were recorded, and in 2014 a total of 20 birds were detected. Carl s Marsh, now a 20 year old restoration, has consistently recorded 8 individuals on surveys since 2010, with the exception of a high count of 14 in 2011. During the 2014 surveys, 8 RIRA were recorded. At the Petaluma River Mouth, including the restored section of Sonoma Baylands to the north, Point Blue recorded 6 RIRA in 2014, compared to 4 in 2012. Novato Creek Mouth numbers have fluctuated more in the last 5 years than other sites along the Petaluma River, with only 5 individuals recorded in 2014, down from the high count of 19 in 2012. However, numbers jumped at this site between 2010 and 2011 as well, which went from 8 to 16 individuals respectively. Richmond/Pinole complex The total number of detections along the north Richmond shoreline continued to increase in 2014, with 66 unique RIRA, doubling the total number from 2012. At Wildcat Marsh north alone, 31 individuals were counted in 2014, from a low of 6 in 2011, and up from 17 in 2013. Richmond Fragment had a count of 22 in 2010, a decline to a low of 12 individuals in 2013, but showed a large increase in 2014, up to a high count of 33 unique individuals. 2014 was also the first year that Point Blue recorded birds in the southern portion of Wildcat Marsh (Castro Creek). Central San Francisco Bay Corte Madera Ecological Reserve The focus of the surveys around Central San Francisco Bay (Bay Bridge to Pt. San Pedro/Pt. San Pablo), remained centered on the Corte Madera Ecological Reserve. Seven sites were surveyed covering the region in 2014, which continues to provide suitable habitat, despite annual RIRA fluctuations recorded in the last few years. Heerdt Marsh detections decreased from 32

P a g e 4 detections in 2012 to 20 unique individuals in 2013, but increased to 44 in 2014, equaling the number recorded in 2011. Muzzi Marsh surveys resulted in 21 individuals in 2014, up from a low of 15 in 2013, but still not close to the high count of 42 in 2011. Corte Madera Creek and Richardson Bay Upstream on Corte Madera Creek at Piper Park, previous surveys in this small marsh parcel yielded 12 individuals in 2010 and 2011, however only 4 RIRA were detected in 2014. Further south in the region, the Bothin Marsh/Tam High Fragment has supported 2 to 5 individuals in the last 5 years and 2 were recorded in 2014. South San Francisco Bay Faber-Laumeister Detections at Faber-Laumeister increased from 50 detections in 2013 to 78 in 2014, still lower than in 2011 and 2012 when rail detections reach 94 and 91, respectively. The Faber Tract doubled the count from 2013, going from 25 to 50, closer to the high count of 69 individuals in 2012. Over the last five years, counts at Laumeister have remained slightly more stable, ranging from 17 to 30, with 32 recorded in 2014. Palo Alto Baylands RIRA detections at Palo Alto Baylands remained stable in 2014 with 14 detected, but is still reduced compared to the 20 detections in 2010. At the adjacent Palo Alto Harbor/Hooks Island site, detections showed a slight increase from 15 in 2013 to 18, the highest count at the site in the last 5 years. Dumbarton and Audubon Marshes Point Blue returned in 2014 to survey Dumbarton East, including the Audubon Marsh, east of Newark Slough. The most recent prior count was in 2010, when 4 birds were recorded in Audubon Marsh. In 2014, 8 birds were recorded, 7 in Audubon and 1 in Dumbarton East.

P a g e 5 Suggested Citation: Elrod, M., J. Wood, X. Castaneda. 2014. California Ridgway s Rail (Rallus obsoletus obsoletus) 2014 Survey Report. TE-807078-14. Report to the Invasive Spartina Project of the State Coastal Conservancy. References Conway, C. J. 2011. Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol. Waterbirds 34(3): 319 346. doi:10.1675/063.034.0307. Liu, L., J. Wood, N. Nur, L. Salas, and D. Jongsomjit. 2012. California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) Population monitoring: 2005-2011. PRBO Technical Report to the California Department of Fish and Game. Wood, J., L. Salas, N. Nur, M. Elrod. 2014. Secretive Marsh Bird Survey Protocol Comparison in San Francisco Bay. Report to USFWS Division of Refuges Inventory and Monitoring Program, Sacramento, CA. Wood, J., X. Castaneda, M. Elrod, N. Nur. 2014. 2013 Annual Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus). Report to USFWS, Sacramento, CA. Acknowledgements Data were collected under TE-807078-14 from USFWS and a Memorandum of Understanding between CDFW and Point Blue (8/1/2012) with funding from the State Coastal Conservancy s Invasive Spartina Project (ISP). During 2014 surveys, along with the ISP, Point Blue benefited greatly from collaboration with a number of other organizations and agencies: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge, San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge, California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Parks and Recreation, City of Palo Alto, and the City of Petaluma.

P a g e 6 Table 1. RIRA Survey Results Summary Highest minimum number of RIRA by site from three rounds of Point Blue 2014 surveys. Bay Region Complex Site Name San Pablo Bay Central San Francisco Bay South Bay Petaluma River (North to South) Richmond Pinole Gallinas Creek Survey Date with Highest Min. Count Highest Min. Count Tule Slough 3/21 8 Woloki Slough 2/7 2 Black John Slough north 2/21 10 Green Point Centennial 3/6 7 Green Point Strip Marsh 3/6 5 Green Point Restoration 3/6 8 Petaluma R. East Strip 2/21 1 Carl's Marsh 2/14 8 Petaluma River Mouth 2/21 6 Day Island Wildlife Area 4/2 2 Novato Creek Mouth N&S 4/2 5 Wildcat Marsh N/Castro Creek 2/24 31 Wildcat Marsh S/Castro Creek 4/8 2 San Pablo Creek 1/21 33 China Camp 2/14 28 Santa Venetia 2/12 29 Mitchell Fragment 2/24 3 McInnis Marsh 3/3 49 Gallinas Creek North 2/18 37 Richardson Bay Bothin Marsh/Tam High Fragment 3/10 2 Heerdt Marsh 2/10 44 Greenbrae Boardwalk 2/10 4 Corte Madera Marta's Marsh 2/13 3 Ecological Reserve Muzzi Marsh 2/13 21 San Clemente Creek 2/13 2 Corte Madera Piper Park 2/27 4 Corte Madera Creek Mouth 2/10 1 Dumbarton Dumbarton Marsh East 2/18 1 Audubon Marsh East 2/18 7 East Palo Alto Palo Alto Baylands Faber Marsh 1/29 50 Laumeister Marsh 3/4 32 Palo Alto Baylands 1/28 14 Palo Alto Harbor/Hook Island 1/28 18 Charleston Slough --- 0

P a g e 7 Figure 1a-g. RIRA Station and Focal Site Location Maps Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014

P a g e 8 Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014

P a g e 9 Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014

Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014 P a g e 10

P a g e 11 Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014

P a g e 12 Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014

P a g e 13 Ridgway s Rail Survey Locations 2014 Palo Alto