Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Similar documents
South Dakota DOE Report Card

South Dakota DOE Report Card

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Allen Elementary School

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

The New York State Report Card

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Michigan School Accountability Scorecards Business Rules

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Westview Early Childhood Education Center 1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803

District: LITTLESTOWN AREA SD AUN: Test Date: PSSA Spring English Language Arts. Mathematics Science

The New York State District Report Card. This District s Report Card. Use this report to: Accountability and Overview Report

College and Career Readiness: Access to Advanced Coursework prior to Graduation

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Orange County High 201 Selma Road, Orange, VA 22960

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

The Math TLC Master s in Mathematics for Secondary Teachers Program

JUST THE FACTS. New Mexico

Methodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015

State of New Jersey

Completing Your Data File For Direct Online Enrollment

State of New Jersey

College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation: Statewide Results

Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School

WORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN

Changing Demographics of Colorado

Participation and pass rates for college preparatory transition courses in Kentucky

State of New Jersey

40th Anniversary COSA Seaside Conference. June 19, Shanda Miller, MPA Wendy Kam, MBA Oregon Audits Division

How To Improve Your School Performance

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

SCHOOL YEAR

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

DRAFT. Denver Plan Every Child Succeeds

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

Anchorage School District Overview November 2011

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

Teens Who Drop Out Teens Not In School and Not Working School Achievement

OFFICE SPACE FOR LEASE

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

New York State Profile

New Jersey High School Performance Ranking - A Summary

2015 TN Accountability Protocol

A Comparison of the Top Ten High School Cohorts and Regents

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

The Parents as Teachers program: its impact on school readiness and later school achievement

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

DATA COACHING WORKSHOP DAY 1 PRESENTED BY SARITA SIQUEIROS THORNBURG, JILL PATNODE & KRISSY SOLTMAN

The Condition of College & Career Readiness l 2011

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

SCHOOL YEAR

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Staffordshire University March 25, Access to Higher Education in the United States: Issues and Challenges

MCA Data Discoveries

San Joaquin County Special Education

CeO CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY University of Wisconsin Madison

Statistical Profile of the Miami- Dade County Public Schools

Examining the Distribution of Teacher Quality in Illinois

State of New Jersey

South Dakota s Growth Model. From Student Growth Percentiles to School Accountability Scores

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURI PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

Moberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report Accredited with Distinction.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PATTERN OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE COURSES TAKEN AND TEST SCORES ON ITED FOR HIGH SCHOOL JUNIORS

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Roosevelt ISD

OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

The State of Education for Columbus Students Preschool - College

School Report Card. School Report Card Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This report contains:

Sky Mountain Charter Eric Schoffstall A o b u o t u t O u O r u r S c S h c o h o o l C n o t n a t c a t

Transitioning English Language Learners in Massachusetts: An Exploratory Data Review. March 2012

School Accountability Report

2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

P-20 in Action Michigan s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Student Success through Collaborative Efforts Pk-20

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

For Canyon View School

Full-day Kindergarten

The Denver Public Schools Personalized Learning Vision. and Framework Urban Collaborative Fall 2014

Santa Clarita Valley International

District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)

State of New Jersey

Application for Graduate Education Programs

Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been

KIPP Scholar Academy. Tiffany Moore, Principal West Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90062

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

Name: Office of Graduate Admission Loyola University Maryland 2034 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093

Transcription:

212-213 Report Card for Kiser PreK-8 School SCHOOL DISTRICT Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT Progress This is your district s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? Performance Inde Value Added 58.7%... D Overall...... Indicators Met Gifted...... F Students with Disabilities...... Lowest in Achievement... C D D COMPONENT Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability? COMPONENT Graduation Rate This grade answers the question How many ninth graders graduate in four years or five years? COMPONENT Annual Measurable Objectives 7.4%... F... Graduation Rates.% This school of students is not graduated evaluated in for 4 years... graduation rate because there are.% not enough of students students graduated in the in graduating 5 years... class. K-3 Literacy This grade answers the question Are more students learning to read in kindergarten through third grade? The 214 report card will report some results. The report card will display one grade for kindergarten through grade 3. COMPONENT Prepared for Success This grade answers the question Are students who graduate from our district ready for college or a career? There are si ways to show that graduates are prepared. In the 214 school year, the report card will show results for the si areas. The report card will display one grade combining the results of all si ways of showing graduates are prepared. COMPONENT Page 1 of 13

. 7.8 2. 28.1 9.5 4.6 8.4 2.3 27.6 8.3. 8.8 19.1 29. 7.2. 7.6 2.7 3.4 7.5 7.8 19.4 29.4 8.8 5.1 212-213 Report Card for Kiser PreK-8 School Achievement This grade combines two results for students who took the state tests. The first result answers the question How many students passed the state test? The second result answers the question How well did students do on the state test? COMPONENT D Performance Inde The Performance Inde measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are si levels on the inde and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's inde. This rewards schools and districts for improving performance. 12 Performance Inde Trend Performance Inde 4 6 2 8 1 Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students. 4.2 8. 29.4 32.3 26.1. Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1..6.3. Points Received. 5.1 8.8 29.4 19.4 7.8. 7.5 1 8 6 7. 68.3 67.6 69.4 7.5 58.7% 7.5 of a possible 12. A 9. - 1.% B 8. - 89.9% C 7. - 79.9% D 5. - 69.9% F. - 49.9% 32.3 4.2 8. 26.1 29.4 4 Advanced Plus 2 Advanced Accelarated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 3.7 3.6 3.1 29 21 211 212 213 Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Page 2 of 13

F Indicators Met Indicators Met measures how many students have passed the state tests at a minimum level, called proficient, or higher. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. At least 75 percent of students must pass to get credit for the indicator. Starting in the 213-14 school year, a district or school needs to have 8 percent of their students pass at a minimum level or higher in order to meet an indicator. Indicators Met %.%. out of 14. 4 6 A B C D F 9. - 1.% 8. - 89.9% 7. - 79.9% 5. - 69.9%. - 49.9% 2 8 1 Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test 3rd Grade 4th Grade 6.7% 62.5% 46.3% 63.4% 17.8% 6th Grade 7th Grade 32.6% 37.% 23.8% 57.1% 41.7% OGT, 1th Graders OGT, 11th Graders Science Social Studies Writing Science Social Studies Writing This school does not have enough Ohio Graduation Test results to display this table. 5th Grade 33.3% 8th Grade 55.6% Science 17.8% Science 25.% Page 3 of 13

Proficiency Percent Comparison by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 85% 75% 65% 55% 45% 62.5% 54.8% 81.4% 78.5% 6.7% 45.1% 1% 9% 3% 29 21 211 212 213 School District State Average 4th Grade 4th Grade 9% 85% 75% 65% 55% 45% 63.4% 6.7% 87.7% 77.7% 46.3% 46.8% 1% 9% 3% 29 21 211 212 213 School District State Average Writing 5th Grade 5th Grade 3% 1% 74.2% 68.7% 67.7% 39.5% 33.3% 28.3% 26.5% 17.8% 17.8% Science 1% % 29 21 211 212 213 Social Studies Science School District State Average 6th Grade 6th Grade Page 4 of 13

9% 3% 37.% 56.4% 82.9% 75.1% 39.6% 32.6% 1% 9% 3% 29 21 211 212 213 School District State Average 7th Grade 7th Grade 9% 3% 57.1% 55.1% 81.% 73.3% 39.9% 23.8% 1% 9% 3% 29 21 211 212 213 School District State Average Writing 8th Grade 8th Grade 9% 3% 85.8% 77.% 68.7% 61.7% 55.6% 48.6% 41.7% 32.% 25.% Science School District State Average 1% % 29 21 211 212 213 Social Studies Science Page 5 of 13

Progress This is your school s average progress for its students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a year. It answers the question Did the students get a year s worth of growth? Did they get more? Did they get less? COMPONENT C D D Coming in 216 Overall This measures the progress for all students in math and reading, grades 4-8. Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest statewide in reading and math achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. High School A High School measure of progress will be implemented in the -16 school year. Test Grade All Grades 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Progress Details This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject. Although Progress scores are not assigned letter grades at this level of detail, the grading scale applied at the Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is: Progress Score All Tests -.1 -.4 -.3-2.2 1.3 -.7 1.1.9 1.3-1.9-6.3-5.1 2.6 4.8 4.8.4-1.4 -.5 A 2. and up B 1. to 1.9 C -1. to.9 D -2. to -1.1 F below -2. Page 6 of 13

Progress vs. Performance Inde This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's performance inde results (horizontal ais) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical ais). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B Grade C Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest Gifted D F Performance Inde 2 4 6 8 1 12 Page 7 of 13

Gap Closing This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question Is every student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability? COMPONENT F AMO Points Annual Measurable Objectives Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of all students to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation and emphasize any achievement gaps that eist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. Math Graduation Rate No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter ecludes all data. 4 6 2 8 1 52. 51.5 4.9 38. This school has no no Annual Measurable Objectives for Graduation Rate because there were not enough students to evaluate. 51.5 38. 7 7.4% A 9. - 1.% B 8. - 89.9% C 7. - 79.9% D 6. - 69.9% F. - 59.9% 24.4 43.7 5.9 19.5 36.6 34.5 2 4 6 8 1 2 4 6 8 1 White Econ Disadvantage Limited English All Students African American Students w/ Disab... White Econ Disadvantage African American All Students Limited English Students w/ Disa... The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 213 AMO for is 83.4%, for Math is 78.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 75.9%. Subgroups with fewer than 3 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. Page 8 of 13

Graduation Rate This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the 9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later. COMPONENT 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 212 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 29 and graduated by 212. 5-Year Graduation Rate A 93. - 1.% B 89. - 92.9% C 84. - 88.9% D 79. - 83.9% F. - 78.9% The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 211 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 28 and graduated by 212. A 95. - 1.% B 9. - 94.9% C 85. - 89.9% D 8. - 84.9% F. - 79.9% 2. 4-Year Rate 1 1 4 6 This 2 school 8 has not been assigned 8 81.3 8 1 a grade for Graduation Rate 69.9 6 6 because there were not enough students 4 to evaluate. 4 2 4 6 8 1 School State Average District 2 5-Year Rate 82.4 72.5. School District State Average Page 9 of 13

Graduation Rate Trend No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter ecludes all data. The Graduation Rate graph that would appear in this space cannot be displayed because there were not enough students to evaluate. Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. Page 1 of 13

Principal: Address: James G. Fowler 141 Leo St Dayton OH 4544-17 Phone: (937) 542-579 Directory information current as of the 212-213 Report Card publication date Your School's Students Average Daily Enrollment: 475 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Ecluded from Accountability Calculations: Enrollment by Subgroup Enrollment # Enrollment % Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic 177 37.2% Hispanic 46 9.6% Multiracial 21 4.5% White, Non-Hispanic 229 48.3% Students with Disabilities 75 15.8% Economically Disadvantaged 475 1.% Limited English Proficiency Migrant 13 27.3% 1% % -- Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Migrant Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Page 11 of 13

Mobility Rates by Subgroup Student Mobility % All Students 1.1% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic 2.1% Hispanic.% Multiracial.% White, Non-Hispanic.8% Students with Disabilities 2.4% Economically Disadvantaged 1.1% Limited English Proficiency.% Migrant 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% % % Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic Limited English Proficiency Students with Disabilities Migrant White, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Multiracial This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. Page 12 of 13

Your School's Teachers Your School's Poverty Status: High Your School Your District Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure 96.8 58.1 92.6 98.6 58.5 3.3 95.2 High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile. Not Calculated because there are fewer than 1 in the group Wellness and Physical Education The etent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Moderate Success Page 13 of 13