Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Deployment of ICT toolbox supporting companies in optimal modal choice Institute of Logistics and Warehousing Poznan, Poland Leszek Andrzejewski Green Corridors Stakeholders Forum Gdansk, 24 October 2011
ITC application for planning intermodal supply chains Planning module 3. Establish Customer Relationships 4. Shipment Planning Register Customer Services Customer Booking Provider Bookings Register Provider Services Provider Services Build Transport Networks Customer Service Register Customer Booking Customer Booking Plan Transport Transport Planned 1. Transport Configuration 2. Network Planning
ITC application for planning intermodal supply chains Operational module 5. Transport Execution Register Customer Services Customer Booking Transport-documentation Provider Bookings Register Provider Services Provider Services Build Transport Networks Customer Service Register Customer Booking Customer Booking Plan Transport Transport Planned Transport Execution and Monitoring/ Transport Executed Deviation Management Deviations Deviation Managed Inovices and Payments Invoices 6. Invoice and Payments
Objectives building data base of the transport operators and their services in selected transport corridors Far East Poland Poland Sweden / Norway demonstrations for the freight market stakeholders functionality of a tool and how it may be helpful in freight decision making all possible transport alternatives across different transport modes scale of benefits resulting from the use of specific modes expected results: set of Key Performance Indicators for transport service quality evaluation set of KPI for tool s implementation process evaluation demo version of the tool functionalities for further dissemination deployment plan cluster of transport operators
Selected transport corridor Container transport route from the Far East to Poland with the alternative use of gateway ports of Rotterdam, Hamburg or Gdansk Corridor profile : sufficient volumes full range of intermodal alternatives on the last route section (Gateway European port final receiver) modal balance in terms of expense level
Containers on-carriage by road Szczecin Gdańsk Białystok Hamburg Poznań Warszawa Rotterdam Frankfurt Łódź Wrocław Katowice Rzeszów Road transport
Containers on-carriage by block trains Variant 1 Szczecin Gdańsk Białystok Hamburg Poznań Pruszków Rotterdam Gądki Łódź Warszawa Wrocław Sławków Katowice Rzeszów Road transport Rail transport
Containers on-carriage by block trains Variant 2 Szczecin Gdańsk Białystok Hamburg Poznań Krzewie Warszawa Rotterdam Frankfurt Wrocław Łódź Brzeg Dolny Sławków Road transport Rail transport Katowice Rzeszów
Containers on-carriage by feeders and on road Gdańsk Szczecin Białystok Hamburg Poznań Frankfurt Warszawa Rotterdam Wrocław Łódź Rzeszów Road transport Sea transport Katowice
Containers on-carriage by feeders on rails and road Szczecin Gdańsk Białystok Hamburg Frankfurt Poznań Krzewie Warszawa Rotterdam Wrocław Łódź Brzeg Dolny Sławków Sea transport Rzeszów Road transport Rail transport Katowice
Delivery lead time in days Gdańsk Hamburg Warszawa Rotterdam Sea transport Overland transport
Cost analysis assumptions 1. Supply patterns in consideration: 1 x 40 FT - representing ca. 65% of supplies 1 x 20 FT - used for transport of heavy loads 2 x 20 FT used for transport of light loads addressed to different receivers 2. Scope of expense analysis Freight charge for transport of loaded container offered by co-operating transport operators THC - Terminal Handling Charges in sea ports Charge for return of empty container (except ocean section) 3. Freight charges level charges representing level valid in the 1st part of 2011 charges do not embrace volume discounts
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Hamburg - Poland Route: Rotterdam - Poland 1 000-44,7 % 1 100-23,3 % 1 367-16,4 % 1 464 1 275-16,9 % 1,2 % 1 337-18,3 % - 13,3 % - 11,7 % 1 420-16,2 % 1 501 1 458 1 561-11,6 % - 2,7 % 1 508 1 507-15,3 % 1 612-10,5 % - 11,4 % 1 695-12,5 % 1 672 1 678-13,8% 1 447 1 603 1 447 1 629 1 737 1 356 1 491 1 650 1 591 1 701 1 782 1 628 1 683 1 x 40 FT 1 907 1 902 1 870 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Hamburg - Poland Route: Rotterdam - Poland 1 268 1 000-11,7 % 2,5 % 1 166-10,4% 1 231-8,9 % 1 308-12,8 % 1 117 1 236 1 287 1 341 1 287 1 475 1 026 0,0 % 1 058-12,6 % 1 058 1 108-9,7 % 1 126-15,5 % 1 090-10,1 % 1 070-15,7 % 1 115-16,0 % - 16,2 % 1 226-13,5 % 1 278-15,8 % 1 267-14,6 % 1 026 1 191 1 x 20 FT 1 161 1 200 1 301 1 392 1 238 1 293 1 452 1 480 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Shanghai - Hamburg - Poland Route: Shanghai - Rotterdam - Poland 2 800 2 336-19,1 % 0,6 % 2 713 2 897-1,4 % 3 031-7,0 % 2 783 2 783 2 965 2 939 3 243-9,3 % 3 073 2 436 2 611-10,5 % - 8,3% 2 703 2 756-8,3 % 2 843-8,1 % 3 008-7,6 % 2 692 2 927 2 827 2 986 3 238-8,3 % 2 837-7,1 % 2 794-6,1 % 2 948-5,8 % 2 844-6,2 % 3 014-6,4 % 1 x 40 FT 3 037 3 118 2 964 3 019 3 206 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Shanghai - Hamburg - Poland Route: Shanghai - Rotterdam - Poland 1 798-6,5 % 2 066 1,5 % 1 964 2 029-5,4% 2 106-7,9% 1 915 2 034 2 085 2 139 2 273-6,2 % 2 085 1 824 0,0 % 1 856-7,2 % 1 906 1 856-5,5 % 1 924-9,1 % 1 888 1 868-9,0 % - 9,4 % - 5,8 % - 9,0% 2 024-8,2 % 1 913-9,3 % 2 076-9,7% 2 065 1 824 1 989 1 x 20 FT 1 959 2 099 1 998 2 190 2 036 2 091 2 250 2 278 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
MODAL SPLIT Route: Hamburg - Poland Route: Rotterdam - Poland Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
Direct container line Shanghai - Gdansk Gdansk St. Petersburg Shuttle Gdansk Finnish Gulf Service Overland connections to the main industrial and consumer centres in Central and East Europe Source : DCT Gdansk S,A,
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Shanghai - Gdansk - Poland Route: Shanghai - Hamburg - Poland 1 846 2 230 2 301-4,8 % -5,9 % 2 297-17,7 % 2 122-23,0 % -51,7 % 2 355-20,5 % 1 967-37,9 % 2 182-26,3 % 2 385 1 966-47,4 % 2 191 2 356-25,2 % - 29,8 % 2 244-35,1 % 2 391-25,8 % 2 336 336 2 436 22611 2 436 2 800 2 800 2 897 2 897 2 713 2 713 2 843 2 843 2 756 2 756 2 703 2 703 2 837 2 948 2 837 2 794 2 794 3 031 3 031 3 008 3 008-17,1 % 2 497-13,9 % 2 549-18,3 % 1 x 40 FT 2 844 3 014 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
FREIGHT RATES COMPARISONS THE FIRST MODAL CHOICE Route: Shanghai - Gdansk - Poland Route: Shanghai - Hamburg - Poland 1 174 1 558-15,4 % - 76,0 % 1 295 1 294-56,8 % 1 572-34,0 % 1 798 2 066 1 964 2 029 2 106-51,7 % 1 906 1 629 1 450-12,0 % - 28,0 % 1 625-14,2 % 1 683-14,4 % 1 510-9,0 % - 25,0 % 1 713 1 825-4,9 % 1 519 1 684-20,2 % - 25,5 % 1 877-10,6 % 1 719-20,1 % 1 824 1 856 1 x 20 FT 1 856 1 888 1 924 2 024 1 868 1 913 2 065 2 076 Road Block train Feeder Direct ocean deliveries
Summary Works completed Basic data base of transport services in selected transport corridors: Shanghai Poland via ports of Rotterdam, Hamburg and Gdansk Sweden/Norway - Poland Alternative modal comparison of transit times and transport expenses Demonstrations of ITC tool and potential benefits from different modal solutions Poznan June 2010 Poznan - October 2010 (workshop of the FLAVIA project) Warsaw June 2011 Sopot October 2011 Katowice November 2011 (planned)
Ongoing works preparing implementation phase Creating cluster of transport operators willing to sell their transport services through open Internet platform Results of questionnaire among 30 transport operators involvement in transport of containers 96% possession of tho own e-logistics system supporting modal choice 53% interested in open e-logistics platforms 88% ready to sell own services through this platform 65% ready to participate in e-logistics system implementation phase 58% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Ongoing works preparing implementation phase Creating common language for exchanging electronic messages electronic data interchange communication standards form of electronic messages and documents standardized business models
Thank you for your attention Institute of Logistics and Warehousing Estkowskiego 6 61-755 Poznań Poland Leszek Andrzejewski Ph.: + 48 61 850 48 79 leszek.andrzejewski@ilim.poznan.pl www.transbaltic.eu