Norfolk International Terminals South Wharf Renovation

Similar documents
A SOLUTION FOR THE NEW YORK HARBOR TODAY. A LEADER FOR THE SHIPPING WORLD TOMORROW.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

The Dynamics of the US Container Market and Shifting Trade Patterns Implications for East Coast and Gulf Coast Ports March 15, 2012

PORT OF OAKLAND - THE LARGEST BLOCK PAVING PROJECT IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

5. Environmental Analysis

Table 4.9 Storm Drain Inlet Protetion Applicable for

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

TRANSFERRING CONTAINER CRANES AROUND CORNERS USING CURVED RAILS DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Informational Workshop Public Meeting Kanawha Falls Bridge Project

MLD: Domestic Maritime Transport Project

Port of the Americas Rafael Cordero Santiago

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

2011 Operations, Maintenance, Monitoring and Rehabilitation Plan

Southern California International Gateway Project Description

FAIRFAX WATER OCCOQUAN RESERVOIR SHORELINE EASEMENT POLICY. February 17, 2011

1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD TTY Users Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd

The world s delivery system for consumer goods, components, and commodities is overloaded.

Port Productivity Summit, Session 4. John Reinhart CEO and Executive Director Virginia Port Authority

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Cuyahoga County s Clean Ohio Revitalization Fund Round 5 Application Great Lakes Shipyard Expansion Project Attachment A1 Application Summary Document

Connecting Science and Management for Virginia s Tidal Wetlands. In this issue...

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

Definition of Tower from the Bradley County Zoning Resolution

BMP-7. A sediment filter or an excavated impounding area around a storm drain drop inlet or curb inlet.

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

Goal 1 To protect the public health, safety and property from the harmful effects of natural disasters.

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF PORTS AND SHIPPING

Executive Management Conference for Latin America and the Caribbean Miami, Feb 2-4, 2005

CASFM Stormwater Quality Field Trip June 23rd, 2011

City of Indian Rocks Beach, Florida NFIP Number

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

consulting engineers and scientists

Facing an Uncertain Future: Increasing Resilience at Marinas and Harbors. Recreational Boating Educational Conference December 11, 2014

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

IMPROVING SOUTH FORK PEACHTREE CREEK WATERSHED USING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Pine Creek Culvert Upgrade $ 560,000. Located at exiting hump dike, just south of Fire Training Center

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

Block and Gravel Inlet Protection (BIP)

The Coast of Crystal Cove Orange County, California

Outlet stabilization structure

Carlton Fields Memorandum

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Orange County Fertilizer Application Education Course for Citizens

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Northern Nevada Water Planning Commission

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Flood Mitigation Strategy for the Milwaukee 30 th Street Corridor Redevelopment Program

Muddy River Restoration Project Maintenance and Management Oversight Committee 68 Harvard Street Brookline, Massachusetts

Automating container terminals Safer, greener and more productive

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

City of Atlanta. Department of Watershed Management. Post-Development Stormwater Management Ordinance Summary of Revisions

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

Ameren Callaway Energy Center-Water Treatment Plant Sedimentation Basins #5 &#6, MO , Construction Permit No. CP , Callaway County

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Design And Construction Of The South San Diego Bay Western Salt Pond Restoration Project Headwaters To Ocean Conference

AREA: 2.37 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF. Single-family, Non-conforming machine shop

Muddy River Restoration Project Project Description

Intermodal Handling TOP PERFORMANCE WITH SMART SOLUTIONS

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

Integrating Asset Management Principals to Watershed Management: A Risk-Based Approach to Managing Stormwater Assets

PORT INFRASTRUCTURES TOC AMERICAS PANAMA CITY OCTOBER 14TH, 2015 MANUEL C. KABANA FRIOPUERTO INVESTMENT, SPAIN

Mosquito Control Guidelines

AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

Engineers at Liftech designed the structure of the first container crane and have designed and reviewed thousands of container cranes since.

Estabrook Dam A Discussion of Alternatives. Public Scoping Meeting June 5, 2014

G3 GRANT LID RETROFIT FOR THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT

SOLD. Lot 1. 1 Mile: Population: 10,200 Median HH Income: $33, Mile: Population: 80,200 Median HH Income: $34,900

APPENDICES G) DETAILED BACKBONE INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Stormwater/Wetland Pond Construction Inspection Checklist

Summary of Potential Storm Drain Projects and Programs

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) Model Stormwater Ordinance for Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements August 2010

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

A Brief Study Of The Development Of Falmouth Within The Context Of The Cruise Ship Pier

Liquid Effluent Treatment Plant (LETP) Land Clean-Up

Georgia Coastal Stormwater Supplement April 2009

Chapter 7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES and SERVICES PLAN

12 February 8, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Grinding equipment that causes raveling, aggregate fractures or disturbance to the joints shall not be permitted.

Windmill Hill Bulkhead Improvements Project. Community Meeting 2 April 13, 2015

Homeowner s Guide to Drainage

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Transcription:

Norfolk International Terminals South Wharf Renovation Presented by: Jeffrey A. Florin, P.E. Chief Engineer Virginia Port Authority and Michael T. Crist, P.E. Moffatt & Nichol January 13, 2006

Cargo Trends The Big Picture Introduction to NIT South History, Infrastructure & Operations How the NIT South Renovation Project Met the VPA s Goals Summary

National Cargo Trends U.S. Cargo Will Double in Volume by 2020 Panama Canal Commission Forecast East Coast Cargo to Triple by 2020 Latin American Trade and Transportation Study (2001) 13 Southern US States Will Reach Capacity Between 2008 and 2012

The China Factor The Nation s Ports as a Whole are Experiencing a 12.2% Increase in Container Trade with Asia East Coast Ports are Seeing a 31.7% Increase in Container Trade with Asia All-Water Shipping Routes Both Inexpensive and Stable

Projected Cargo Demand and Planned Capacity 12.0 Planned Capacity Revised 2005 Forecast 10.0 TEUs (in Millions) 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 Maersk Terminal Craney Island Marine Terminal 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040 Source: VPA Master Plan. Forecast numbers represent average increase over the forecast period.

Projected Cargo Demand and Planned Capacity 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 TEUs (in Millions) 2.0 1.5 1.0 Capacity Improvements Due to: Empty Container Yards 0.5 Container Yard Expansion 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Chassis Pool Source: VPA Master Plan. Forecast numbers represent average increase over the forecast period.

Growth in Container Ship Sizes The MSC Pamela is Currently One of the Largest Container Ships in the World 9,200 TEUs 150 Feet Wide 1,053 Feet Long 49-Foot Draft

Container Ship Evolution

Cargo Trends The Big Picture Introduction to NIT South History, Infrastructure & Operations How the NIT South Renovation Project Met the VPA s Goals Summary

Norfolk International Terminals Norfolk Naval Base Hampton Hampton Blvd Blvd Terminal Blvd Gate Complex USN FFS HRSD Pier 3 Pier 2 Pier 1 NIT North NIT Central NIT South

NIT South Timeline 1918 Site Was a U.S. Army Quartermaster Depot 1964 Site Declared Surplus by Federal Government 1965 Acquired by City of Norfolk 1967 First Container Crane On Site (CB1) 1969 Two More Cranes Added (CB2) 1972 Site Acquired by VPA & Another Crane Purchased (CB3) 1989 VPA Purchased 3 More Cranes (CB4)

NIT South NIT Container Terminal Opened in 1967 Container Berth 1 Built in 1918 740-feet (226 m) Crane #1 Purchased in 1967 50-ft Gage (15.2 m) 13-wide Container Reach Operating Wheel Loads (kips/ft) LS: 14 WS: 16 CB1 Crane #1

NIT South Terminal & Wharf Expansion in 1969 Cranes #2 & #3 Purchased in 1969 50-ft Gage (15.2 m) 13-wide Container Reach Operating Wheel Loads (kips/ft) LS: 17 WS: 19 Container Berth 2 Built in 1969 849-feet (259 m) Crane #2 Crane #3 CB1 CB2

NIT South Terminal & Wharf Expansion in 1978 CB3 CB2 Crane #4 CB1 Container Berth 3 Built in 1978 1,104-feet (336 m) Crane #4 Purchased in 1978 50-ft Gage (15.2 m) 13-wide Container Reach Operating Wheel Loads (kips/ft) LS: 22 WS: 20

NIT South Terminal & Wharf Expansion in 1989 Container Berth 4 Built in 1989 1,540-feet (469 m) Cranes #5, #6 & #7 CB1 CB2 CB3 Crane #5 Crane #6 Purchased in 1989 50-ft Gage (15.2 m) 17-wide Container Reach Operating Wheel Loads (kips/ft) LS: 23 WS: 30 Crane #7 CB4

NIT North Straddle Carrier Operations

NIT South Existing Conditions Operations Overhead Busbars Not Compatible With Straddle Carrier Operations

NIT South Existing Conditions Operations Yard Hustlers Moved Containers From the Wharf

NIT South Existing Conditions Operations RTGs Stacked Grounded Containers

NIT South Existing Conditions Operations Valet System Required Large Amounts of Space

NIT South Existing Conditions Infrastructure Some Sections of Wharf Over 80 Years Old Oldest Container Crane Dated Back to 1967

Cargo Trends The Big Picture Introduction to NIT South History, Infrastructure & Operations How the NIT South Renovation Project Met the VPA s Goals Summary

NIT South Renovation Overall Project Goals Keep Pace With Containerized Cargo Forecasts Accommodate Increasing Container Ship Sizes Allow for Operational Conversions (Rubber-Tire Gantry v. Straddle Carrier) Full Renovation of NIT South Terminal 4,230 Feet (1,289 Meters) of Wharf 8 New Suez-Class Container Cranes 140 Acres (57 Hectares) of Container Yard

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Wharf Structure Face of New Wharf Placed 66 Feet Waterward of Original Structure Minimize Impacts to Yard Operations Flexibility in Meeting Dredge Depths 66 Ft.

Wharf Structure Flat Plate Concrete Structure with Pile Capitals Keep Structure Out of Tide Zone Open Pile Layout Flexibility in Pile Driving Tolerances (2-Ft. in Any Direction)

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Dredge Depths Pile Sizes and Spacing 36 Inch Cylinder Piles 20 On Center Existing Mudline EL. 45.0 Current Dredge Line EL. 50.0 Future Dredge Line EL. 60.0

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Environmental Impacts Open Pile Structure on Same Alignment as Original Structure Minimized Need to Fill Additional River Bottom Created Only Additional Shadowing Under-Wharf Detention Basin Impounded Portion of River Environmental Impacts Requiring Compensatory Mitigation 5.1 Acres of River Bottom.02 Acres of Vegetated Tidal Wetlands

Compensatory Mitigation VPA Believed NIT Renovation Project Deserved High-Profile Mitigation Project Landscape Approach Convinced Regulatory Agencies of Project Benefits Proposed Mitigation Type Compensatory Mitigation Ratio Required Mitigation for NIT Renovation Impact Proposed Plum Point Compensation Tidal Wetlands 2:1 10 acres 1 acre creation Submerged Lands 1:1 5 acres 1 acre restored Open Space Preservation 20:1 100 acres 5 acres preserved and enhanced

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration 5-Acre Tract of Unused Land Along Norfolk s Urban Waterfront Eroding Shoreline Low Valued Vegetation Adjacent Waterway Littered With Debris Plum Point - April 2002

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration Timber Piles (Future River Clean-Up Area) South Side of Plum Point March 2002 Eroding Shoreline (Future Wetlands Restoration Area) North Side of Plum Point March 2002

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration 1 Acre of Spartina Grass Wetlands Creation 1 Acre of Submerged Bottom Land Restoration 5 Acres of Open Space Preservation and Enhancement Plum Point November 2005

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration Rip Rap Shoreline Protection (River Clean-Up Area) South Side of Plum Point May 2004 Wetlands Planting (Wetlands Restoration Area) North Side of Plum Point May 2004

Plum Point Park Environmental Restoration

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Reuse & Recycle Fourth Berth Incorporated into New Structure Select Demo Phase 4 Completed Quickly Demo Materials from Berths 1, 2 & 3 Used as Subbase Elsewhere on Terminal

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Treatment Options Considered Conventional Pond Loss of 7 to 9 Acres of Container Handling Area Underground Collection Pipes Concerns About Collapse Due to Heavy Wheel Loads at Terminal Under-Wharf Detention Basin Located in Unused Area Below Wharf Supplemental Stormwater Treatment Devices Vortechnics Units

Pre-Project Conditions Hodgepodge Stormwater Drainage Areas

Selected Stormwater Treatment Strategy Consolidated Drainage Areas

Under-Wharf Detention Basin Section View

Under-Wharf Detention Basin Met Treatment Requirements Located in Unused, Available Space Under Wharf Installation Concurrent with Wharf Construction Can Accommodate Sediment Volumes Anticipated Over the Life of the Structure Obviated Need for a Conventional Storm Water Treatment Pond

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Proximity to Lochhaven Lafayette River Lochhaven Capp s Creek NIT South Elizabeth River

Community Concerns Open Dialogue Between VPA, M&N & Community Leaders Construction Noise Concerns Specifications Prevented Night Time/Early Morning Pile Driving Environmental Concerns Regarding Health of Adjacent Waterway Educate Citizens About VPA s Stormwater Treatment System and Pollution Prevention Program

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Berth 1 Under Construction Berths 2, 3 & 4 Operational NIT South Wharf

NIT South Wharf Berth 1 Complete Berth 2 Under Construction Berths 1, 3 & 4 Operational

NIT South Wharf Berths 1 & 2 Complete Berth 3 Under Construction Berths 1, 2 & 4 Operational

Berths 1, 2 & 3 Complete Berth 4 Under Construction Berths 1, 2 & 3 Operational NIT South Wharf

All Berths Complete and Operational NIT South Wharf

NIT South Operations Straddle Carriers in Use

Cargo Trends The Big Picture Introduction to NIT South History, Infrastructure & Operations How the NIT South Renovation Project Met the VPA s Goals Summary

NIT South Renovation Specific Project Goals 1. Increase the Width of the New Wharf Structure to Accommodate 100-Ft Gage Cranes 2. Accommodate Dredge Depths to 60-Ft 3. Minimize and Mitigate Environmental Impacts 4. Re-Use Existing Structures Where Possible 5. Accommodate Stormwater Run-Off with No Impacts to Container Operations 6. Address Community Concerns About Noise and Pollution 7. Maintain Three Operational Berths at All Times During Construction

Summary NIT South Wharf Renovation Can Serve as an Example to the Port Industry Upgrade Aging Port Infrastructure No Negative Impacts to Operations Innovative Approach to Addressing Environmental Concerns VPA Now Has a State-of-the-Art Container Wharf Capable of Service the Industry for the Next 50 Years