ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Similar documents
ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

2014 REPORT CARD DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES OF DATA

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

The New York State Report Card

Allen Elementary School

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

SCHOOL YEAR

South Dakota DOE Report Card

How To Pass The Bill Of Rights In Illinois

The New York State District Report Card. This District s Report Card. Use this report to: Accountability and Overview Report

School Report Card. School Report Card Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This report contains:

Arizona AYP Terms. Arizona AMOs. Math AMO (percent passing) Reading AMO

South Dakota DOE Report Card

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Moberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report Accredited with Distinction.

Westview Early Childhood Education Center 1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation: Statewide Results

How To Ask A School Administrator A Question About Your School

How To Improve Your School Performance

School Accountability Report

Iowa School District Profiles. Central City

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

School Accountability Report

Huntsville City. Superintendent Dr. Ann R. Moore

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

SCHOOL YEAR

OVERVIEW OF DISTRICT PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

School Leader s Guide to the 2015 Accountability Determinations

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

A Comparison of the Top Ten High School Cohorts and Regents

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

New York State Profile

TEST-DRIVEN accountability is now the

OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE AND ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE.

School District Summary

Illinois State Board of Education. ISBE Student Information System (SIS) Training for Nonpublic Special Education Programs

Accountability and Virginia Public Schools

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Data Collection and Reporting

2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary

Elmhurst Community Prep

Michigan School Accountability Scorecards Business Rules

Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

Template for Local Grantee Evaluations ISBE 21st Century Community Learning Center Program. II. Overview and History of Program

The University of the State of New York The State Education Department. L.P. Quinn Elementary School. March 2003

2015 TN Accountability Protocol

Essential Programs & Services State Calculation for Funding Public Education (ED279):

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) Title III, Part A Accountability System

Department Costs Analysis 2/24/2014

Michigan Department of Community Health

San Joaquin County Special Education

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

Issue Brief. Illinois School Funding Formula and General State Aid. August 2006

Transitioning English Language Learners in Massachusetts: An Exploratory Data Review. March 2012

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR

Illinois e-plans. Title I District Plan Checklist

Anchorage School District Overview November 2011

NCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Freeman S c h o o l D i s t r i c t

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT

ADE - State/Federal Reporting Overview

State of New Jersey

Illinois Criteria for Meeting the NCLB Requirements for Highly Qualified Teachers

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

Appendix E. Texas State Education Data

Structured English Immersion Models of the English Language Learner Task Force

River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Y O U T H L E A D. Summer U LEAD Program Application

Education Chapter STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER SPECIAL PROGRAMS I

REPORT CARD THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL SCHOOL. Airport High School 1315 Boston Avenue West Columbia, SC RATINGS OVER 5-YEAR PERIOD YEAR

Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Michigan s State Performance Plan Annual Public Reporting

Statistical Profile of the Miami- Dade County Public Schools

South Carolina State Report Card

Simon Scholar Application Class of 2018

Contracting with Technical Colleges and Other Ways to Complete High School

For Canyon View School

John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of IDEA and NCLB January

Transcription:

PRAIRIE DU ROCHER CCSD 3 PRAIRIE DU ROCHER, ILLINOIS and federal laws require public school districts to release report cards to the public each year. 2 7 ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD STUDENTS RACIAL/ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND OTHER INFORMATION 5.9 9.6 9.3 Asian/ Pacific Islander 3.8 Native American.2 Multi racial /Ethnic 2.2 Low- Income Rate 3.7.9 Limited- English- Proficient Rate 7.2 High Sch. Dropout Rate Chronic Truancy Rate.7 2.5 Mobility Rate 9. 5.2 Attendance Rate 95. 93.7 Total Enrollment 73 2,77,856 Low-income students come from families receiving public aid; live in institutions for neglected or delinquent children; are supported in foster homes with public funds; or are eligible to receive free or reduced-price lunches. Limited-English-proficient students are those students eligible for transitional bilingual programs. Mobility rate is based on the number of times students enroll in or leave a school during the school year. Chronic truants are students who are absent from school without valid cause for 8 or more of the last 8 school days. INSTRUCTIONAL SETTING PARENTAL CONTACT* Percent STUDENT-TO-STAFF RATIOS Pupil- Teacher Elementary Pupil- Teacher Secondary Pupil- Certified Staff Pupil- Administrator 96. 5.7 8.8 2. 3.9 73. 23.6 * Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE (as of the first school day in May) Grades K 5 6 7 8 9-2 2 2.9 8. 2. 2 7. 3. 22. 6.. 2.3 2.8 22.5 22.8 22.6 2.8 7. 2.9 TIME DEVOTED TO TEACHING CORE SUBJECTS (Minutes Per Day) English/Language Arts Grades 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 6 8 55 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 58 53 5 3 3 5 93 Social 3 6 8 3 5 5 3 3 TEACHER INFORMATION (Full-Time Equivalents) Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Total Number 7.7 92.3 3 85. 8.8.6.2.2 23. 77. 27,

2 TEACHER INFORMATION ( Continued ) : All Schools High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools : All Schools High Poverty Schools Average Teaching Experience (Years).8 2.9 2.5 % of Teachers with Bachelor's Degrees 6.5 7.6 5.3 % of Teachers with Master's & Above 38.5 52.3 9.6 % of Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials.5 2.6 % of Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 3.2 3. The No Child Left Behind Act requires that information for certain data elements be disaggregated by high- and low-poverty schools. Poverty (low-income) is defined on page of all report cards. High- and low-poverty schools include those in the top and bottom quarters of the poverty distribution of schools in the state. Disaggregated data are reported only if at least one school in your district falls within the high-poverty quarter and at least one school within the low-poverty quarter. Low Poverty Schools 2.3. 59.9.9.2 SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCES TEACHER/ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES (Full-Time Equivalents) $2, $6, Salaries and counts of staff are summed across a district based on the percentage of time that each individual is employed as a teacher or an administrator and may or may not reflect the actual paid salaries for the district. $2, $2,3 $8, $, $5,29 $58,275 $75,9 $ Average Teacher Salary Average Administrator Salary EXPENDITURE BY FUNCTION 25-6 (Percentages) 7 6 56.9 5 7.8 3 3.5 32.7 2 7. 5.2 2.6 6. Instruction General Administration Supporting Services Other Expenditures

3 REVENUE BY SOURCE 25-6 % % EXPENDITURE BY FUND 25-6 % % Local Property Taxes Other Local Funding General Aid Other Funding Federal Funding TOTAL $286,65 $75,366 $69,2 $88,2 $3,663 $,353,865 2.2 5.6 5. 3.9 8. 58.8 6. 8.2 9.3 7.7 Education Operations & Maintenance Transportation Bond and Interest Rent Municipal Retirement/ Social Security Fire Prevention & Safety Site & Construction/ Capital Improvement TOTAL $98,79 $25,8 $7,75 $ $ $37,68 $ $ $,252,93 78. 8.6 3. 73. 8.6 3.9 6.2.8. 5. OTHER FINANCIAL INDICATORS 2 Equalized Assessed Valuation per Pupil 2 Total School Tax Rate per $ $2,97 3.33 ** ** 25-6 Instructional Expenditure per Pupil $,35 $5,567 25-6 Operating Expenditure per Pupil $6,736 $9,88 ** Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per $ are not provided. Equalized assessed valuation includes all computed property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated. Total school tax rate is a district's total tax rate as it appears on local property tax bills. Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils. Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal retired, and capital expenditures. ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OVERALL STUDENT PERFORMANCE These charts present the overall percentages of state test scores categorized as meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards for your district and the state. They represent your district's performance in reading, mathematics and science. OVERALL PERFORMANCE - ALL STATE TESTS 9. 9.3 8 6 72.9 73.8 25-6 26-7 2

OVERALL ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) PERFORMANCE 8 9.3 9.7 77. 78.7 6 25-6 26-7 2

5 ISAT PERFORMANCE These charts provide information on attainment of the Illinois Learning Standards. They show the percents of student scores meeting or exceeding Standards for the grades and subjects tested on ISAT. ISAT Grade 3 8 85.7 76.5 7.7 73. 9. 85.6 86.8 6 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 8 85.7 72.9 73.7 95.2 92.3 8.8 86. 95.2 79.8 79.8 6 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 5 8 88.2 8. 68.5 69.7 82. 9.5 78.6 82.5 6 25-6 26-7 2

6 ISAT Grade 6 8 6 9 87.5 72.8 73. 93.8 79. 8. 25-6 26-7 2 ISAT Grade 7 8 8.3 9.9 72. 73. 93.8 9.9 76. 79. 8.9 79.3 6 2 25-6 26-7 ISAT Grade 8 8 88.2 82. 79.2 8.8 82. 78.2 8.3 6 25-6 26-7 2

7 PERFORMANCE ON STATE ASSESSMENTS Federal law requires that student achievement results for reading, mathematics and science for schools providing Title I services be reported to the general public. The Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) is administered to students in grades 3 through 8. The Prairie Achievement Examination (PSAE) is administered to students in grade. The Illinois Measure of Annual Growth in English (IMAGE) is administered to limited-english-proficient students. The Illinois Alternate Assessment (IAA) is administered to students with disabilities whose Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) indicate that participation in the ISAT or PSAE would not be appropriate. Students with disabilities have an IEP (No Child Left Behind Act). An IEP is a written plan for a child with a disability who is eligible to receive special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS NOT TESTED IN STATE TESTING PROGRAMS All Gender Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/ Pacific Islander Native American Multi racial /Ethnic LEP Migrant Economically Students with Disadvantaged Disabilities *Enrollment 96 9 7 96 7 28 *Enrollment,8,882.2.2 553,532.. 53,38.. 595,977 2, 26,359,73..2...2..2...2,757 23,96 8,25.2.2 58.2.2 58,57.5.5 55,9.. * Enrollment as reported during the testing windows. ILLINOIS STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TEST (ISAT) The following tables show the percentages of student scores in each of four performance levels. These levels were established with the help of Illinois educators who teach the grade levels and learning areas tested. Due to rounding, the sum of the percentages in the four performance levels may not always equal. Level -- Academic Warning - Level 2 -- Below Standards - Level 3 -- Meets Standards - Level -- Exceeds Standards - Student work demonstrates limited knowledge and skills in the subject. Because of major gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills ineffectively. Student work demonstrates basic knowledge and skills in the subject. However, because of gaps in learning, students apply knowledge and skills in limited ways. Student work demonstrates proficient knowledge and skills in the subject. Students effectively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems. Student work demonstrates advanced knowledge and skills in the subject. Students creatively apply knowledge and skills to solve problems and evaluate the results. Grade 3 Grade 3 - All 5.3 23.5 6.7 2.7 8.8.8 2. 3.7 5.9 7.6 9.5.7 23.5 2.

8 Grade 3 - Gender 7. 2.3 7.5 2.2.3 9. 3.. 3.6 9. 5.2 27.2 3. 9.7 6..9 Grade 3 - Racial/Ethnic Background 23.5 6.7.8 5.9 7.6 23.5 2.7.9 5.5 3.9.2.9.6 52.3 2.3 37.2 2. 8..8 2. 9.7 8. 6. 28.2 52..5 3.5.7 53.8 3. Asian/Pacific Islander. 9.2 8...5 2. 27.8 69.2.7 6. 56.9 22..7 7.8 5.2.3 Multiracial/Ethnic.9 22.3 5 22.8 2.8 9.9 7.9 39.5 Grade Grade - All 76.9 23. 7.7 8.6 7.7. 25.2 8.3 25..2 2.5 56.9 29.5 3.5 6.7 8.6 6.5 5. 8.2 Grade - Gender.5 27.9 7.2 23.5.5 3. 55..3. 6.5 59. 2.5.6 22.5 9.5 27..8.9 58.7 28.7 3. 7. 6.2 5.8

9 Grade - Racial/Ethnic Background 76.9 23. 7.7 8.6 7.7 8.6 5..5 7. 9. 33.2.5 6.8 55. 37.6. 8.6 6. 25.8 2.7 7..9 8.3 3. 28.7 58.2 9.8.8 37. 8.5 3.2. 3.5 53.7.8.9 3.5 66. 9. 3.3 2.9 67.8 7. Asian/Pacific Islander.2 9.2 8.6 2....6 56..6 6. 6.5 28.8.7 27. 7.6 23.6.9. 57.6 27. 3..9 65.8 6.2 Multiracial/Ethnic. 25.7 9. 23.9.2 2.9 59.8 26. 3.2 6.3 65. 5. Grade 5 Grade 5 - All Grade 5 - Gender 9. 6.9 9. 9.5 8. 9.5.8 29.6. 25.6.5 7. 62.8 9.7 8.2 72.7 9. 9. 8.8 9.. 33. 2.8 23.2.7 8. 6.7 2.7.5 2 26. 5 5.5 3 28.. 5.9 8 6.9 8.8 Grade 5 - Racial/Ethnic Background 9. 6.9 9. 9.5 8. 9.5. 2.5 5.3 33.8.2 9.7 6.3 25.8 2. 53.6.6 8.2.6 38.2 55. 5..7 35. 9.6.7.3 8. 7.5. Asian/Pacific Islander. 2.2.8 2.8. 3.7 9.7 6.5 29.6 3.5 26.9. 8.8 67.3 3.5 Multiracial/Ethnic.8 28.9 5.7 2.7. 6.6 6.7 8.3

Grade 6 Grade 6 - All 2.5 62.5 25. 6.3 75. 8.8.2 26. 5.3 9..5 8. 62.2 9.2 Grade 6 - Gender 7 2 7 2.3 29.9 53.7 6.2.7 9.5 6. 9.7. 22.8 5.9 22.2.3 6.5 6. 8.7 Grade 6 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic 2.5 62.5 25. 6.3 75. 8.8. 6.5 57. 26.2.3. 6.2 25.5. 6.2 6.8 6.5. 37.9 5.9 5.9.3 37.6 53.8 8.. 22. 67..3. 9.3 53.7 36.9. 3.9 8.2 7.8 22.9 62.2.9. 6. 67.9.9.2 23.7 56.9 9.2. 6.8 65.2 7.6 Grade 7 Grade 7 - All 9. 8.8 9. 9. 8.8 9. 5.5 5.5.5 26. 58.3 5. 2.3 8.3 5.2 25.2 7. 3.7 55.2 2. Grade 7 - Gender.7 29.9 56.3 3. 2.8 8.8 52. 26.3 7.7 3.3 52.5 26.5.3 22.2 6.5 7..7 7.8 56.5 2. 6.2.3 58. 2.

Grade 7 - Racial/Ethnic Background Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial/Ethnic Grade 8 9. 8.8 9. 9. 8.8 9. 5.5 5.5.3 7. 6.5 2.8..8 53.8 3.3 3. 7.3 5.7 35..2.2 5.6 5.5 36.3 5.2 7. 6.3 26.8 5.9 5..5 35. 57.7 6.7 2.3 22.8 6.8 3. 9.5 2.3 6.2 9.. 9.3 6. 29.3.5.3 39. 56..5.5 5.9 3.. 2. 69. 9.3 3.3 9. 57.3 2.3 5.7 9. 6.8 2.5.5 23. 6. 5..9 7.8 57. 23.2 5.9.6 6 22.5 Grade 8 - All 7.6 76.5 5.9 76.5 23.5.6 7.7 69.9.8.2 7.5 52.3 29. Grade 8 - Gender 25. 75. 9.7 8.3.8 2.6 67.8 9.8.5 8.8 5. 29.6.3 3.6 72.2..9 6.2 5.5 28. Grade 8 - Racial/Ethnic Background 7.6 76.5 5.9 76.5 23.5.3 2.6 7. 6..6. 5.8 38.2.3 28.9 66. 3.7 3. 35. 52.3 9.2.6 23.2 7.8 5.. 22.2 6. 6. Asian/Pacific Islander.2 6.2 7.3 23..2.3 35.5 6 7.7 73.2 9..5 2 5.3 27.2 Multiracial/Ethnic.5 6.5 7.6 2..2 6.3 5.8 27.7

2 27 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) INFORMATION Is this district making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? Yes Has this district been identified for Improvement according to the AYP specifications of the federal No Child Left Behind Act? No Is this district making AYP in? Yes 27-8 Federal Improvement Status Is this district making AYP in? Yes 27-8 Improvement Status Percent Tested on Tests Percent Meeting/Exceeding Standards * Other Indicators Attendance Rate Graduation Rate % Met AYP % Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Safe Harbor Target ** Met AYP % Met AYP % Met AYP AYP Minimum Target 95. 95. 55. 55. 9 72. All Yes Yes 83.5 Yes 93. Yes 95. Yes Yes Yes 83.5 Yes 93. Yes Asian/Pacific Islander Multiracial /Ethnic LEP Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged Four Conditions Are Required For Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP):. At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging. 2. At least 55.% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions.*** 3. For schools not making AYP solely because the IEP group fails to have 55.% meeting/exceeding standards, % may be added to this variable in accordance with the federal 2% flexibility provision.. At least 9% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 72% graduation rate for high schools. * Includes only students enrolled as of 5//26. ** Safe Harbor Targets of 55.% or above are not printed. ***Subgroups with fewer than 5 students are not reported. Safe Harbor only applies to subgroups of 5 or more. In order for Safe Harbor to apply, a subgroup must decrease by % the percentage of scores that did not meet standards from the previous year plus meet the other indicators (attendance rate for non-high schools and graduation rate for high schools) for the subgroup. For subgroups that do not meet their Safe Harbor Targets, a 75% confidence interval is applied. Safe Harbor allows schools an alternate method to meet subgroup minimum targets on achievement.

3 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT STATUS Below is a list of the Title I funded schools in the district that are in School Improvement Status as defined by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2. Number of schools in this district: Number of Title I schools: Number of Title I schools in School Improvement Status: Percent of schools in School Improvement Status: % School ID School Name Years in School Improvement