BASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINATION FOR REACHES OF LAKE LABISH DITCH AND LITTLE PUDDING RIVER, MARION COUNTY, OREGON

Similar documents
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

A Flood Warning System for City of Findlay, Ohio

UNION COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

FEMA Flood Zone Designations

DEVELOPING AN INUNDATION MAP STANDARD FOR THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

MAP TYPES FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP MAP READING & FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES. FHBM Flood Hazard Boundary Map. FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map

How to Read a Flood Insurance Rate Map Tutorial. Developed September 2000 Updated June 2003

Quality Assurance Reviews of Hydraulic Models Developed for the Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation Program

Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology

A Method Using ArcMap to Create a Hydrologically conditioned Digital Elevation Model

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

Stream-Network Navigation in the U.S. Geological Survey StreamStats Web Application

ROSEAU COUNTY, MINNESOTA

PUTNAM COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Stream Channel Cross Sections for a Reach of the Boise River in Ada County, Idaho

Evaluation of Open Channel Flow Equations. Introduction :

USGS StreamStats Web Application for Kentucky

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

FLOODPLAIN DELINEATION IN MUGLA-DALAMAN PLAIN USING GIS BASED RIVER ANALYSIS SYSTEM

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Fort Dodge Stormwater Master Planning. Prepared By: Ralph C. Stark, Jr., P.E., C.F.M. Joel N. Krause, P.E., C.F.M.

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

Request for Proposals for Topographic Mapping. Issued by: Teton County GIS and Teton County Engineering Teton County, Wyoming

Innovative Approaches in Flood Damage Reduction

2D Modeling of Urban Flood Vulnerable Areas

Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping. Changes Since Last FIRM

Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

Criteria for Appeals of Flood Insurance Rate Maps

HYDROLOGIC/HYDRAULIC MODELING OF WESTMINSTER WATERSHED ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Appendix 4-C. Open Channel Theory

H. Khalid Jamil 9367 Verain Street San Diego, CA, (858)

2011 HYDRAULICS MANUAL

LAFAYETTE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

CHAPTER 9 CHANNELS APPENDIX A. Hydraulic Design Equations for Open Channel Flow

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. Why is the City of Tucson getting new flood hazard maps? 2. Who is responsible for modernizing the maps?

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

LIDAR and Digital Elevation Data

How To Study Floodway

AUTOMATION OF FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Madison Preliminary Flood Map Open House Community Meeting

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

University of MT Helena College of Technology Helena, MT July 21, Image Courtesy Watershed Sciences, Inc.

James City County and Williamsburg Open House Meeting

Using GIS Data With HEC-RAS

FEMA Elevation Certificate

SIMPLIFIED INUNDATION MAPS FOR EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS. National Dam Safety Review Board Emergency Action Plan Workgroup

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Watershed Delineation

GRADY COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Procedures for No-Rise Certification For Proposed Developments in the Regulatory Floodway

Charles R. Gamble TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CANE CREEK FLOOD-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AT STATE ROUTE 30 NEAR SPENCER, TENNESSEE

A HYDROLOGIC NETWORK SUPPORTING SPATIALLY REFERENCED REGRESSION MODELING IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

FEMA Updates Flood Plain Information For 2006

Permit Application No. Development Address. Legal Description. A. Flood Plain and Floodway Information and Sources: (To be completed with Staff)

Alluvial Fan Mapping and Risk Assessment

Development of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland

Farnsworth House Flood Risk and Conceptual Mitigation Evaluation River Road Plano, Illinois

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How To Build A Floodproofed Basement

CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS

Flooding in the Middle Koyukuk River Basin, Alaska August 1994

Town of Chatham Department of Community Development

CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION US-34A and US-34D PERMANENT FLOOD REPAIRS

Overview of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Recent Flood Mapping Efforts. Richard Zingarelli

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

JACKSON COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands

UTILITIZATION OF ECOHYDROLOGIC MODELS IN FLOODPLAIN FISH PASSAGE AND HABITAT RESTORATION EVALUATION

Impact of water harvesting dam on the Wadi s morphology using digital elevation model Study case: Wadi Al-kanger, Sudan

Mercer County, New Jersey Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

Passaic County, New Jersey Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Interpreting Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Maps and Studies in the Coastal Zone

CDM. City of Jacksonville Master Stormwater Management Plan (MSMP) Update. December 2008 Update. Agenda. 1. Data Collection. 2.

CHAPTER 3 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

COLORADO FRONT RANGE FLOOD OF 2013:

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

TABLE OF CONTENTS. This document was prepared by. URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD In Association with:

HEC-RAS. River Analysis System. Applications Guide. Version 4.1 January US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center CPD-70

Recent Innovations In Virginia Dam Safety & Floodplain Management Program

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Salem County, New Jersey Flood Hazard Mapping Status Report for Property Owners

Chapter 4. Flood Risk Assessment

Create a folder on your network drive called DEM. This is where data for the first part of this lesson will be stored.

Computing Stormwater Runoff Rates and Volumes

Openings in Foundation Walls for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

City of West Linn Public Works Design Standards Table of Contents

Appendix C - Risk Assessment: Technical Details. Appendix C - Risk Assessment: Technical Details

The following was presented at DMT 14 (June 1-4, 2014, Newark, DE).

Lower Breton Sound Sediment Diversion Conceptual Engineering Design Presentation

2. BENEFIT:COST ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Transcription:

State of Oregon Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Vicki S. McConnell, State Geologist BASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINATION BF-13-01 BASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINATION FOR REACHES OF LAKE LABISH DITCH AND LITTLE PUDDING RIVER, MARION COUNTY, OREGON by Jed T. Roberts 1 and Daniel E. Coe 1 2013 1 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, #28, Suite 965, Portland, OR 97232

DISCLAIMER The Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries is not liable for any claimed damage from the use of this information. The Federal Emergency Management Agency may, at any time in the future, revise the Base Flood Elevations for this study area. This study and Base Flood Elevation determination does not supersede any existing or future detailed analyses or determination performed by a licensed professional engineer. This analysis and mapping does not necessarily identify all areas subject to flooding, particularly from local drainage sources of small size. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 Published in conformance with ORS 516.030 This report was prepared by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries for AKS Engineering & Forestry in fulfillment of the Base Flood Elevation Determination Agreement made effective August 12, 2013. For copies of this publication or other information about Oregon s geology and natural resources, contact: Nature of the Northwest Information Center 800 NE Oregon Street #28, Suite 965 Portland, Oregon 97232 (971) 673-2331 http://www.naturenw.org For additional information: Administrative Offices 800 NE Oregon Street #28, Suite 965 Portland, OR 97232 Telephone (971) 673-1555 Fax (971) 673-1562 http://www.oregongeology.org http://egov.oregon.gov/dogami/

TABLE OF CONTENTS Study Background... 1 Physical Setting... 2 Hydrologic Analysis Methods... 3 Hydraulic Analysis Methods... 4 Summary of Results... 5 Recommendations... 6 References... 7 Appendix A: Map of Hydraulic Analysis Results... 8 Appendix B: Hydraulic Analysis Data Package... 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Zone A Special Flood Hazard Area Mapped by FEMA in 2003.... 2 Figure 2. Location of Study Reaches.... 3 Figure 3. Discharge Locations.... 4 Figure 4. Location of Cross-Sections Used for Hydraulic Analysis... 5 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Summary of 100-Year Flood Discharges.... 4 Table 2. Summary of 100-Year Flood Elevations.... 6 STUDY BACKGROUND This study was conducted under a Base Flood Elevation Determination Service agreement dated August 12, 2013, between the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) and AKS Forestry and Engineering. The purpose of this study was to develop 1% annual chance (100-year) water surface elevations, also known as Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), for reaches of Lake Labish Ditch and the Little Pudding River in Marion County, Oregon. BFEs are determined primarily for administration of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) oversees the NFIP and issues Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) that depict Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) within which flood insurance for structures is typically required. SFHAs are mapped by detailed or approximate methods. A detailed analysis produces BFEs that are mapped onto best available topographic data to define the boundaries of SFHAs designated as Zone AE, Zone AO, or Zone AH. Detailed analyses are commonly performed for streams in urban or suburban settings. An approximate analysis does not produce BFEs; instead, this method has historically involved engineering judgment to map SFHAs onto best available topographic data, often U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic sheets. Approximate analyses are commonly performed for streams in rural areas, and SFHAs mapped with this approach are designated as Zone A. The approximate analysis approach was used to map SFHAs that are shown on the currently effective FIRM for Lake Labish Ditch and the Little Pudding River (Figure 1). Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 1

DOGAMI has partnered with FEMA through its Cooperating Technical Partner program to improve FIRMs by introducing high-resolution lidar (light detection and ranging) topographic data. As part of this effort DOGAMI has developed a FEMA-approved computer model-based approach to produce BFEs with lidar and revise Zone A SFHAs. This same approach was applied for the current study to produce BFEs in an area where FEMA has not yet funded a lidar-based FIRM revision. Figure 1. Zone A Special Flood Hazard Area Mapped by FEMA in 2003. PHYSICAL SETTING Lake Labish Ditch is a channel that was excavated in the late 1800s to drain Lake Labish for agricultural use. Due to a slight topographic divide in the middle of the historic lake, two main ditches comprise the Lake Labish Ditch system (FEMA, 2003). The west ditch drains into Claggett Creek, a tributary to the Willamette River. The east ditch drains into Little Pudding River. The east ditch has its confluence with the Little Pudding River just upstream of the Little Pudding River s confluence with the Pudding River. The east ditch and the reach of the Little Pudding River between its aforementioned confluences are the focus of this study (Figure 2). Prior to 1950, flood events on the Pudding River caused water to back up on the Little Pudding River and flood the Lake Labish Ditch valley. In the 1950s the Natural Resources Conservation Service constructed the Parkersville dam and pump station on the Little Pudding River to prevent flooding in the Lake Labish Ditch valley due to flood events on the Pudding River (FEMA, 2003). 2 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01

Figure 2. Location of Study Reaches. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS METHODS Two discharge locations were identified for this study. Because the area of interest is along Lake Labish Ditch, one discharge location was identified at the mouth of Lake Labish Ditch, just upstream of Little Pudding River. To account for backwater effects, a second discharge location was identified on Little Pudding River just upstream of Howell Prairie Road (Figure 3). Backwater effects from the Pudding River were not considered due to the presence of the Parkersville dam at Howell Prairie Road. 100-year peak discharges were calculated using a regional regression equation developed by the Oregon Water Resource Department (OWRD) and the USGS (Cooper, 2005). OWRD and USGS divided western Oregon into three hydrologic regions with separate regression equations. The watersheds upstream of the discharge locations both fall completely within Region 2B. For these ungaged locations the 100-year peak discharge is given by the equation where Q 100 = 31.85 Area 0.9114 Slope 0.4501 I 24-2 0.6252 Q 100 = the 100-year (1% annual chance) peak discharge, in cubic feet per second, Area = the drainage area of the watershed, in square miles, Slope = the mean watershed slope, in degrees, and I 24-2 = the 2-year (50% annual chance) 24-hour precipitation intensity, in inches. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 3

Basin characteristics were determined using the USGS StreamStats for Oregon web tool (USGS, 2013). The resulting 100-year peak discharges are listed in Table 1. Figure 3. Discharge Locations. Table 1. Summary of 100-Year Flood Discharges. Discharge Location Lake Labish Ditch, upstream of confluence with Little Pudding River Little Pudding River, upstream of Howell Prairie Road Drainage Area (sq. mi.) Mean Watershed Slope (deg.) 2-year 24-hour Precipitation Intensity (in.) 100-Year Peak Discharge (cfs) 14.6 0.76 1.87 479 61.7 1.4 1.94 2,400 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS METHODS Steady flow hydraulic models were developed using the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS 4.1) provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Brunner, 2010). Geometric input data were developed using the Esri ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced 10.1 software package, the Esri 3D Analyst and Spatial Analyst extensions, and the HEC-GeoRAS 10.1 add-on provided by USACE (Ackerman, 2011). 4 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01

Geometric data layers, including stream centerline, flowpaths, cross-sections, and bridges, were digitized from a hillshade raster derived from a 3-foot resolution lidar digital elevation model (DEM). The lidar DEM was derived from ground classified points with an average density of 0.15 per square foot. The vertical accuracy for the lidar acquisition area is ± 0.13 feet. Lidar acquisition for the study area took place in October 2008 (DOGAMI, 2011). Cross-sections were placed at least every 500 feet perpendicular to the stream centerline. Opening widths for road crossings were assumed to be 10 feet unless a larger width was determined by measuring the channel widths nearest the crossing. An assumed deck thickness of 3.5 feet was applied to all road crossings. Ineffective flow was applied to off-channel areas of inundation. A normal depth reach boundary condition was determined by calculating the slope of a uniform gradient for the downstream section of the study reach. A Manning s roughness coefficient of 0.04 was applied globally. Figure 4. Location of Cross-Sections Used for Hydraulic Analysis. SUMMARY OF RESULTS The results of hydraulic modeling show that BFEs range from 134.2 feet (NAVD88) at the downstream terminus of the study reach to 142.2 feet (NAVD88) at the upstream terminus. Backwater flooding from the Little Pudding River controls BFEs on Lake Labish Ditch to 65 th Avenue. Table 2 shows BFEs at select cross-sections throughout the study reach. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 5

Table 2. Summary of 100-Year Flood Elevations. Reference Cross-Section 1 Location Description BFE (ft. NAVD88 2 ) LPR-1 Little Pudding River, 1,275 feet upstream of Howell Prairie Road 134.2 LPR-2 Little Pudding River, 1 mile upstream of Howell Prairie Road 134.5 LPR-3 Little Pudding River, 770 feet downstream of Rambler Drive 134.6 LPR-4 Little Pudding River, 1,210 feet upstream of Rambler Drive 134.7 LPR-5 Little Pudding River, 1,640 feet upstream of Rambler Drive 134.7 LPR-6 Little Pudding River, 3,770 feet upstream of Rambler Drive 135.0 LPR-7 Little Pudding River, 2,360 feet downstream of Labish Center Road 135.2 LLD-1 Lake Labish Ditch, just upstream of 65 th Avenue 135.1 LLD-2 Lake Labish Ditch, 3,160 feet upstream of 65 th Avenue 135.4 LLD-3 Lake Labish Ditch, 2,760 feet downstream of 55 th Avenue 136.9 LLD-4 Lake Labish Ditch, just downstream of 55 th Avenue 138.0 LLD-5 Lake Labish Ditch, just upstream of 55 th Avenue 141.1 LLD-6 Lake Labish Ditch, 1,690 feet upstream of 55 th Avenue 142.2 1 See Appendix A for map of reference cross-sections. 2 North American Vertical Datum of 1988. RECOMMENDATIONS The pump station at the Parkersville dam only operates during the summer growing season (FEMA, 2003). Because most flood events are likely to occur during the winter months, there is potential for the flood control structure to trap water upstream and exacerbate flood conditions on the Little Pudding River and Lake Labish Ditch. In 1996 this was the case when floodwaters backed up into Lake Labish Ditch and flooded approximately 15 homes in the City of Keizer (FEMA, 2003). Photographs, provided to DOGAMI, showing high water on Lake Labish Ditch during the 1996 flood event, demonstrate that flood elevations in the east ditch reached at least 143 feet (NAVD88). This is approximately 6 feet higher than the BFE calculated at the same location for this study. DOGAMI performed an alternative hydraulic analysis to reflect an extreme flood event without the Parkersville dam pump station operating. The results showed it is possible for floodwaters on Lake Labish Ditch and the Little Pudding River to reach 152 feet (NAVD88) before overtopping Howell Prairie Road. The BFEs produced from this study represent the 100-year flood event under natural flow conditions. However, given observed impacts resulting from the operation of the Parkersville dam, it is strongly recommended that a factor of safety (up to an elevation of 152 feet NAVD88) be applied when considering purchase of flood insurance or development near the floodplain. 6 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01

REFERENCES Ackerman, C. T., 2011, HEC-GeoRAS GIS tools for support of HEC-RAS using ArcGIS user s manual version 4.3.93: Davis, Calif., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, CPD-83, 244 p. Brunner, G. W., 2010, HEC-RAS River Analysis System User s Manual, version 4.1: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, CPD-68, 790 p. Cooper, R. M., 2005, Estimation of peak discharges for rural, unregulated streams in western Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5116, 134 p. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2003, Flood insurance study for Marion County and incorporated areas: vol. 1 of 2: Washington, D.C., 180 p. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI), 2011, Northern Coast Range Lidar Data: Lidar Data Quadrangle Series, LDQ-2011-45122-A8-Gervais, LDQ-2011-45123-A7-Silverton. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 7

APPENDIX A: MAP OF HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS RESULTS Attached to this report is a map depicting the hydraulic analysis results of a 100-year flood event under natural flow conditions for reaches of Lake Labish Ditch and the Little Pudding River. 8 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01

BASE FLOOD ELEVATION DETERMINATION REPORT BF-13-01

APPENDIX B: HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS DATA PACKAGE Attached to this report is a data package containing the input and output datasets used to perform this study. It includes: HEC-RAS 4.1 models HEC-GeoRAS 10.1 input geometry data in GIS format o Cross-sections o Stream centerlines o Flowpaths o Bridges HEC-GeoRAS 10.1 output data in GIS format o 100-year flood zone o 100-year water surface elevation grid o 100-year depth grid o Cross-sections with computed 100-year water surface elevations 3-foot resolution lidar DEMs in GIS format Composites of Lake Labish Ditch and Little Pudding River output data in GIS format o 100-year flood zone o 100-year water surface elevation grid o 100-year depth grid Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Base Flood Elevation Determination BF-13-01 9