VISAKH SPM REFINERY PROJECT

Similar documents
GLOSSARY OF TERMINOLOGY

LNG A Different Approach The Teesside GasPort Project

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

OVERLAND PIPELINE OPTIONS

Pipelines and seabed intervention

Offshore Structures. Offshore Drilling Equipment

SHAFT CONSTRUCTION IN TORONTO USING SLURRY WALLS

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

Tremie Concrete CM 420 CM 420 CM 420 CM 420. Temporary Structures. Tremie Concrete

Profile. Marine ingenuity In just two words, we show what we do, how we do it, and what makes us different. Dredging and Marine Contractors

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

Mercator Limited. Driven by growth Sustained by values

Structural concepts for minimum facility platforms for Marginal field development in western offshore, India

SWIMMING POOL, SPA, & HOT TUB GUIDELINES

THE BALTIC SEA OFFSHORE PROJECTS

Geotechnical Design Monopile Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines

The information and materials contained in this disc are provided as is and as available.

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

GUIDANCE NOTES FOR DEVELOPMENTS OR ENGINEERING WORKS IN THE VICINITY OF SPT SUBWAY INFRASTRUCTURE JULY 2005

High Strain Dynamic Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Söderströmtunnel: immersion in downtown Stockholm, Sweden

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE

HV Submarine Cable Systems Design, Testing and Installation

Horizon Survey and Geotechnical Companies

SECTION SHEETING, SHORING AND BRACING

Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Electrical System. Outline Traffic Management Plan

Proposed Minimum Subterranean Termite Treatment Standards

SECTION GRAVITY SANITARY SEWERS

AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION FOR FIXED OFFSHORE LNG REGASIFICATION TERMINALS

Frequently Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions

Prepared and Submitted by

Single Point Mooring System (SPM) for an Offshore LNG Terminal

Enbridge Class Location Change Management Plan. 1.1 Additional Information for Identified Changed Class Locations

CASE HISTORY #2. APPLICATION: Piping Movement Survey using Permalign Laser Measurement System

Advanced Natural Gas Storage (ANGAS) Project and Verification Tests of Experimental Lined Rock Cavern in Japan

Electric heat tracing

Permits to Dig / Permits to Excavate / Permits to work near underground services

SECTION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 5: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN

Optimising plate girder design

OWPST & Titan 200 & UK Offshore

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Step 11 Static Load Testing

Electric Engineering Division FIBER CONDUIT RULES AND REGULATIONS

Offshore Work Packages

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER AND SEWER PIPELINES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES UNDER THE

OFFSHORE FIELD DEVELOPMENT

ATTACHMENT F ONSHORE PIPELINES DECOMMISSIONING GUIDELINE 1. INTRODUCTION

London Array. Operations and Maintenance

The work of this Section includes furnishing and installing Reinforced Concrete Pressure Pipe as shown on the Drawings and as specified.

PTS HELICAL PIERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS NOTICE

BUILDING OVER OR NEAR WATER & SEWER MAINS POLICY

Boskalis: at home in the Middle East

Tunnelling & Underground. Specialists

PIPELINE INSPECTION UTILIZING ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGY: ON THE ISSUE OF RESOLUTION By, M. Beller, NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany

Arctic HSE seminar 1. Ice behavior in northern regions, availability and need for metocean & ice data. Paul Verlaan 24 th March 2014

Micropiles Reduce Costs and Schedule for Merchant RR Bridge Rehabilitation

SAFETY FENCES, SAFETY BARRIERS AND PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAILS

Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05

San Antonio Water System Standard Specifications for Construction ITEM NO POINT REPAIRS AND OBSTRUCTION REMOVALS

COCHIN PORT TRUST INVITATION EXPRESSION OF INTEREST FOR

ITEM # OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFT

PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACTORS ALL RISKS

KIRLOSKAR FIRE FIGHTING PUMPS AND PACKAGES

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

FUNDAMENTALS OF LANDSCAPE TECHNOLOGY GSD Harvard University Graduate School of Design Department of Landscape Architecture Fall 2006

QUESTIONNAIRE AND PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACTORS ALL RISK INSURANCE

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

Local Authority Building Control Technical Information Note 3 Driven and In-situ Piled Foundations

BUILDING MATERIALS, Wood, Laminated (Page 1 of 3) Viz.: Rafters; Arches; Beams; Joists; Timbers or Planks, structural or roof.

Method Statement for Static Load Testing (Compression) for Micropiles

UNLOCKING MAJOR COST SAVINGS ON OIL & GAS PROJECTS

Multisensor Data Integration in O&G Business Lutz Petrat Hélène Lemonnier Michael Hall

TECHNICAL NOTE Lining of Casings with SaniTite HP Pipe

Certificate Programs in. Program Requirements

SPECIFICATION FOR PIPE SUBSOIL DRAIN CONSTRUCTION

Mersin, TURKEY. Port extension project

2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

Drew University Ladder Safety Program Policy and Inspection Procedure Draft 0412

Engineers at Liftech designed the structure of the first container crane and have designed and reviewed thousands of container cranes since.

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Communication Links for Offshore Platforms. A User s Guide to Troposcatter Communications

OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS DUE TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE JONES ACT

SECTION SUPPORT OF EXCAVATION

Annex IV of MARPOL 73/78. Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR PLACEMENT OF UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION CABLES IN THE VICINITY OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Trenching and Excavation Safety

Handling, Erection and Bracing of Wood Trusses

LARGE DIAMETER PIPELINE INNOVATIVE FAST TRACKED REPAIR

PART 4: SITE INFORMATION

Marine Transportation of Compressed Natural Gas

Transcription:

VISAKH SPM REFINERY PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA PREPARED FOR HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED (HPCL) INTECSEA PROJECT NO : 21534102

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 Objective... 2 2. DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION... 3 2.1 Discussion... 3 2.2 Conclusion & Recommendation... 3 3. LONG TERM REMEDY... 5 3.1 General... 5 3.2 Remedial Action Piled Support for Pipeline... 5 ATTACHMENTS POST DREDGING SURVEY DATA REMEDIAL DETAILS SOIL BOREHOLES (BH-12/R13) DATA Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA 1. INTRODUCTION Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Visakh Refinery (HPCL-VR) is planning to develop crude unloading facilities to handle a large crude parcel of size about 300,000 MT by VLCC Tankers to meet the crude requirement of their existing as well as future crude processing requirements. HPCL-VR is presently receiving crude at Offshore Tanker Terminal (OSTT) of Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT). The tanker size at OSTT is limited by the available water depth of 19m, and can not receive VLCC. HPCL-VR proposes to install Single Point Mooring (SPM) Terminal and connected facilities off the coast of Visakhapatnam Port to receive and offload crude by VLCC tankers. HPCL-VR as part of this project, will install Single Point Mooring (SPM) terminal and related facilities at the water depth of about 35m, at a distance of about 4.0 km from the coast. Crude from SPM will be pumped and transported via 48 inch NB line pipe from SPM to Crude Oil Storage Facility of Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves LTD (ISPRL) and also will be hooked up to the existing 36 crude oil pipeline to refinery. The offshore section of the pipeline route is about 4.0 km from SPM to LFP (Land Fall Point) and onshore section from LFP to ISPRL is 1.2 km. 1.1 Objective This document presents the long term remedial action proposed for the 260m section of the offshore pipeline route i.e. from Ch150 to Ch410 m wherein the seabed and pipeline profile was noticed to have been changed from the as-built status due to sand dredging activity by Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT) in the close vicinity of the 48 HPCL pipeline route. Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA 2. DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 2.1 Discussion The current situation is due to dredging too close to the pipeline by the Dredger hence removing the soil below the pipeline, allowing pipeline to be vertically displaced and free spanning at few locations. It is understood that the dredging operation has been carried out by Dredging Corporation of India on behalf of VPT using one Hopper Suction Dredger. Some of the soil might have also been removed by the propellers of the dredger. Temporary measures were undertaken immediately to reduce the free spans which were developed due to the removal of sand underneath the pipeline. There were several sand bag supports placed in order to reduce the length of the free spans which occurred due to dredging. Survey of the pipeline profile and the seabed profile was performed before and after placement of the sandbag supports. The survey data had revealed important changes in subsoil and pipeline levels with free spanning of pipeline at some locations which are within the allowable limits. The dredging in the sand trap area is the routine annual activity of VPT. Since 48 crude pipeline is located in very close proximity of sand trap area, permanent solution is considered necessity in order to avoid further increase in pipeline spans and stress levels. A detailed feasibility study was performed to evaluate the possible remedial action that will aim to permanently protect the pipeline from such dredging mishaps on account of slippage of sand support from underneath of the pipeline. The following action was identified as part of the study and the most feasible which is recommended as the way forward for the long term remedial action to permanently protect the pipeline. The remedial action is discussed in detail in Section 3.0 of this report: Remedial Action Piled Support for Pipeline 2.2 Conclusion & Recommendation 2.2.1 Conclusion It is concluded that a long term remedial action is required due to the impact of sand trap dredging works on the 48 subsea pipeline to ensure the pipeline is protected during the entire operation life and the pipeline stresses & spans are always within the allowable limits to maintain operability in a safe condition. VPT while discussions on the subject indicated that movement of sand towards the sand trap shall also not get unduly obstructed otherwise it may affect the port operation on long term basis. Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA 2.2.2 Recommendation The following action is recommended which needs to be implemented in consultation with VPT/ CWPRS and IIT Chennai: Remedial Action introducing permanent piled supports for the pipeline at a certain interval in the pipeline section of concern i.e. Ch150 to Ch410 m. Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA 3. LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION 3.1 General Following the sand trap dredging activity by DCI in the month of March 2010, Leighton Contractors (India) Pvt. Ltd. had performed a survey and based on the review of the survey data it is found that the subsoil and pipeline levels have been affected. The bathymetric survey data and cross sections after the sand trap dredging are presented in Appendix A. As part of the short term remedial action, Leighton Contractors have undertaken the following actions for quick support of the pipeline free span sections. a) Conduct full video survey of 48 pipeline and surrounding sea bed, KP 200 through KP 320 (visibility permitting). Pipeline condition to be confirmed as acceptable. b) Provide four nos. of sand bag supports in the region where free spans were found to be more than 20m. c) Conduct full video survey of pipeline confirming (or not) adequate support afforded pipeline at KP s 210, 260 and 320. INTECSEA have also performed the bottom roughness analysis of the section of the pipeline in the sand trap area and the findings concluded that all existing spans along the pipeline route from KP0.0 to KP0.51 are within the allowable span limits. Equivalent stresses also do not exceed the pipeline allowable stresses limits. It is noted that natural backfilling occurs from time to time that fills up the pipeline free spans space and further covers the pipeline in relatively short terms. However, considering the frequency of the dredging works (yearly basis) a long term remedy is required and following is the selected remedial measure to be implemented as the permanent solution. 3.2 Selected Remedial Action Piled Support for Pipeline The selected remedial action is a proposal to provide permanent steel supports for the pipeline at regular intervals along the pipeline section in the proximity of sand trap area. These steel pipeline supports are bolted to the two piles driven adjacent to the pipeline. Please refer to the attachments for details of piles and support. The 48 pipeline shall be supported by a plate connected to a beam which is further held by 2 piles driven into the seabed on either side of the HPCL pipeline. This arrangement will always hold the pipeline in its vertical as well as horizontal alignment even if the dredger removes sand below the pipeline. This also will have minimum restrictions to Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA sand movement towards the sand trap. In view of all above this action is considered most appropriate. Thus, the piled support for the 48 pipeline is recommended as this action provides an effective solution to protection for the entire pipeline design life. This action also ensures continuous movement of sand towards the sand trap area. The piled support consists of a 12.7mm thick 300mm wide plate supporting the 48 pipeline. This plate shall be connected to a horizontal beam with stiffener plates which will be on top of the pipeline with an acceptable clearance. The beam will be held by means of bolted connections to 2 piles driven into the seabed adjacent to the pipeline on both the sides of pipeline i.e. sand trap side and Dolphin Hill side. The piles to be driven shall be 24 19.1mm thick structural steel. Diagrammatic detail of the remedial action is presented in the attachment of this report. The additional scope of this remedial work (Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Installation EPCI) shall be undertaken under a separate tender package which is planned to be executed before the next dredging season of Feb 2011. Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA POST DREDGING SURVEY DATA Pipeline Remedy Action.doc

XYZ DATA EVERY 5m INTERVAL CHAINAGE EASTING NORTHING SEABED TOP OF PIPE 160 743543.73 1956377.33 6.20 4.69 165 743546.52 1956373.18 6.34 4.83 170 743549.30 1956369.03 6.47 4.97 175 743552.08 1956364.87 6.65 5.13 180 743554.85 1956360.70 6.81 5.30 185 743557.62 1956356.54 6.92 5.42 190 743560.29 1956352.52 7.04 5.54 195 743563.16 1956348.22 7.13 5.62 200 743565.93 1956344.05 7.21 5.71 205 743568.70 1956339.89 7.30 5.79 210 743571.32 1956335.96 7.38 5.88 215 743574.24 1956331.57 7.55 6.03 220 743577.01 1956327.41 7.72 6.19 225 743579.78 1956323.24 7.93 6.39 230 743582.55 1956319.08 8.14 6.61 235 743585.32 1956314.92 8.36 6.82 240 743588.09 1956310.76 8.59 7.05 245 743590.87 1956306.59 8.80 7.26 250 743593.64 1956802.44 8.96 7.46 255 743596.43 1956298.29 9.18 7.66 260 743599.22 1956294.14 9.35 7.83 265 743602.01 1956289.99 10.27 7.99 270 743604.80 1956285.84 11.18 8.18 275 743607.59 1956281.69 10.48 8.23 280 743610.38 1956277.54 9.78 8.28 285 743613.17 1956273.39 11.01 8.25 290 743615.96 1956269.24 12.24 8.24 295 743618.74 1956265.11 11.27 8.11 300 743621.53 1956260.96 10.29 7.98 305 743624.32 1956256.81 10.07 7.85 310 743627.11 1956252.66 9.84 7.73 315 743629.90 1956248.51 9.68 7.64 320 743632.69 1956244.37 9.52 7.56 325 743635.48 1956240.22 9.21 7.47 330 743638.27 1956236.07 8.90 7.40 335 743641.06 1956231.92 8.95 7.29 340 743643.85 1956227.77 9.01 7.18 345 743646.64 1956223.62 8.84 7.07 350 743649.43 1956219.47 8.67 6.96 355 743652.23 1956215.31 8.46 6.85 360 743655.02 1956211.16 8.23 6.78

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL WORK OPTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA REMEDIAL OPTION DETAILS Pipeline Remedial Option - ITB.doc

HPCL - VISAKH REFINERY SPM PROJECT LONG TERM REMEDIAL WORK OPTION PROPOSED FOR HPCL SUBSEA PIPELINE AT THE SAND TRAP AREA SOIL BOREHOLES (BH-12/R13) DATA Pipeline Remedial Option - ITB.doc