RAD 216 ADVANCED IMAGING MODALITIES

Similar documents
MDCT Technology. Kalpana M. Kanal, Ph.D., DABR Assistant Professor Department of Radiology University of Washington Seattle, Washington

CT scanning. By Mikael Jensen & Jens E. Wilhjelm Risø National laboratory Ørsted DTU. (Ver /9/07) by M. Jensen and J. E.

Cynthia H. McCollough b) and Michael R. Bruesewitz Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions

Spiral CT: Single and Multiple Detector Systems. AAPM Refresher Course Nashville, TN July 28,1999

PET/CT QC/QA. Quality Control in PET. Magnus Dahlbom, Ph.D. Verify the operational integrity of the system. PET Detectors

CT RADIATION DOSE REPORT FROM DICOM. Frank Dong, PhD, DABR Diagnostic Physicist Imaging Institute Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland, OH

Purchasing a cardiac CT scanner: What the radiologist needs to know

Scan Time Reduction and X-ray Scatter Rejection in Dual Modality Breast Tomosynthesis. Tushita Patel 4/2/13

Cone Beam Reconstruction Jiang Hsieh, Ph.D.

WHERE IN THE WORLD JILL LIPOTI?

MEDICAL IMAGING 2nd Part Computed Tomography

SUBCHAPTER 22 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY INSTALLATIONS

Page: 1 of 6 Page: 1 of 6

Lecture 14. Point Spread Function (PSF)

REGULATION: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY INSTALLATIONS N.J.A.C. 7:28-22

Physics testing of image detectors

A software tool for Quality Assurance of Computed / Digital Radiography (CR/DR) systems

Thinking ahead. Focused on life. REALIZED: GROUNDBREAKING RESOLUTION OF 80 µm VOXEL

How To Improve Your Ct Image Quality

Role of the Medical Physicist in Clinical Implementation of Breast Tomosynthesis

CT: Size Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE): Why We Need Another CT Dose Index. Acknowledgements

Contents. X-ray and Computed Tomography. Characterization of X-rays. Production of X-rays

GE Medical Systems Training in Partnership. Module 8: IQ: Acquisition Time

American College of Radiology CT Accreditation Program. Testing Instructions

Low-dose CT for Pulmonary Embolism

Moving Forward What does this mean for the Medical Physicist and the Imaging Community?

Automation of a CT Acquisition: A System-based User-Support. 1. Introduction. Bärbel KRATZ 1, Frank HEROLD 1, Malte KURFISS 1

The disclaimer on page 1 is an integral part of this document. Copyright February 23, 2016 by AAPM. All rights reserved.

5 Factors Affecting the Signal-to-Noise Ratio

Data. microcat +SPECT

Multi-slice Helical CT Scanning of the Chest

Fundamentals of Cone-Beam CT Imaging

IMAGE PROCESSING AND DATA ANALYSIS IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

SECTION 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE FOR CLASSES OF RADIATION APPARATUS

CHAPTER 3: DIGITAL IMAGING IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY. 3.1 Basic Concepts of Digital Imaging

Implementation of Cone-beam CT imaging for Radiotherapy treatment localisation.

Computerized Tomography, X-rays, and the Radon Transform

Study the Quality Assurance of Conventional X-ray Machines Using Non Invasive KV meter

Rb 82 Cardiac PET Scanning Protocols and Dosimetry. Deborah Tout Nuclear Medicine Department Central Manchester University Hospitals

TISSUE MIMICKING GEL QUALITY LE PHANTOM SERIES DESIGN. performance the ultrasound labs ofand. icking material has the same attenuation mim-

HIGH PERFORMANCE MOBILE SURGICAL C-ARM KMC-950

CONTENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLUOROSCOPY EXAMINATION

Assessing Radiation Dose: How to Do It Right

Cardiac CT for Calcium Scoring

Digital Mammography Update: Design and Characteristics of Current Systems

INTRODUCTION. A. Purpose

Chapter 3 SYSTEM SCANNING HARDWARE OVERVIEW

QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIALS: PET

M D Anderson Cancer Center Orlando TomoTherapy s Implementation of Image-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Medical Image Processing on the GPU. Past, Present and Future. Anders Eklund, PhD Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute

Q.A. Collectible. Sponsored by CRCPD s Committee on Quality Assurance in Diagnostic X-Ray (H-7)

Radiographic Grid. Principles of Imaging Science II (RAD 120) Image-Forming X-Rays. Radiographic Grids

Computed Tomography Resolution Enhancement by Integrating High-Resolution 2D X-Ray Images into the CT reconstruction

R/F. Efforts to Reduce Exposure Dose in Chest Tomosynthesis Targeting Lung Cancer Screening. 3. Utility of Chest Tomosynthesis. 1.

An Overview of Digital Imaging Systems for Radiography and Fluoroscopy

DICOM Correction Item

Surveying and QC of Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Units for ACR Accreditation

MODELING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MECHANICAL SYSTEM AND CONTROL OF A CT WITH LOW ENERGY PROTON BEAM

Performance testing for Precision 500D Classical R/F System

Breast MRI Quality Control

AAPM REPORT NO. 39 SPECIFICATION AND ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS

X-ray Production. Target Interactions. Principles of Imaging Science I (RAD119) X-ray Production & Emission

Acknowledgement. Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding. Nomenclature for Radiation Design Criteria. Shielding Design Goal (Air Kerma):

IAEA HUMAN HEALTH SERIES

Graphical displays are generally of two types: vector displays and raster displays. Vector displays

Dose Measurement in Mammography; What are we measuring? David E. Hintenlang, Ph.D. DABR University of Florida

Quality Control of Full Field Digital Mammography Units

The disclaimer on page 1 is an integral part of this document. Copyright March 1, 2016 by AAPM. All rights reserved.

Patient-centered CT imaging: New methods for patient-specific optimization 1 of image quality and radiation dose

Clinical Physics. Dr/Aida Radwan Assistant Professor of Medical Physics Umm El-Qura University

Quality Control and Maintenance Programs

Clinic. ED Trauma Trauma Stroke. OR Neuro/Spine. Critical Care. Neuro ENT. Diagnostic. Pediatric. Radiology. Plastics Thoracic. Neuro.

A d v a n c e d 1 2 8

Brilliance CT 64-channel confi guration

Prepublication Requirements

Computed Tomography Instrumentation. Ian A. Cunningham. Data-Acquisition Geometries. Ian A. Cunningham

Recommendations for a technical quality control program for diagnostic X-ray equipment

Development of SCENARIA New Version Software MEDIX VOL. 62 P.32 P.35

Correcting the Lateral Response Artifact in Radiochromic Film Images from Flatbed Scanners

2/28/2011. MIPPA overview and CMS requirements. CT accreditation. Today s agenda. About MIPPA. Computed Tomography

Patient Prep Information

Experimental study of beam hardening artefacts in photon counting breast computed tomography

SITE IMAGING MANUAL ACRIN 6698

DENTAL Cone beam 3D X-RAY SYSTEM with

The Challenge of CT Dose Records

Production of X-rays. Radiation Safety Training for Analytical X-Ray Devices Module 9

Performance evaluation and quality assurance of Varian enhanced dynamic wedges

Radiography: 2D and 3D Metrics of Performance Towards Quality Index

AN INNOVATIVE & CUTTING-EDGE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM

Synthetic Sensing: Proximity / Distance Sensors

Image Analysis for Volumetric Industrial Inspection and Interaction

X-ray Imaging Systems

kv-& MV-CBCT Imaging for Daily Localization: Commissioning, QA, Clinical Use, & Limitations

Siemens Computed Tomography

Transcription:

RAD 216 ADVANCED IMAGING MODALITIES Introduction to Computed Tomography COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY Also called CT, was marketed in the 1970 s by EMI, a British corporation. CT s inventor, electrical engineer Dr. Godfrey Hounsfield, was awarded a Nobel Prize (1979) for his work in producing the first CT images in 1967. FIRST PROTOTYPE CT SCANNER The first CAT scanners were limited to the head. 1

CT SCANNERS The scanner consists of the housing (gantry) that contains the x-ray tube and detector elements. A scan table is situated so that the patient can be positioned within the gantry s opening. CT SCANNERS A minicomputer is used to process data using an array processor. Rather than a single microprocessor (CPU), array processors use several. This enables image processing to be divided among the microprocessors in order to shorten scan time. 2

CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: FIRST GENERATION Early scanners were limited to the head. An x-ray tube and single detector was used. During the scan, the tube and detector moved in a series of sweeps and rotations called translate-rotate. CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: FIRST GENERATION The single detector system required long scan times, a single slice requiring 5 minutes to complete. 1 st GENERATION CT 3

CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: SECOND GENERATION By adding more detectors, the beam could be directed to cover a broader area, called a fan beam. The beam was thin enough to define thin slices. The scan still utilized a translaterotate pattern, but scan time was reduced. 2 nd GENERATION CT CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: THIRD GENERATION A curved detector array was introduced with an increased number of gas-filled detectors. The x-ray tube and detector array rotate during the scan (a departure from the translate-rotate mode. 4

CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: THIRD GENERATION Scan times, although considerably shorter than in previous generation scanners, could take 20 seconds to complete (per slice). 3 rd GENERATION CT CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: FOURTH GENERATION The major innovation was the use of a fixed detector array system. Only the x-ray tube rotates during the scan. The x-ray tube moves along a track, called a slip ring. 5

CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: FOURTH GENERATION By using a slip ring, the x-ray tube can rotate continuously without snagging power cables. Depending on design, the high voltage transformer rotates along with the x- ray tube. FOURTH GENERATION CT CT SCAN DEVELOPMENT: FOURTH GENERATION Short scan times (1 slice per second) and continuous tube rotation makes helical or spiral CT possible. 6

HELICAL (SPIRAL) CT Helical CT involves the rotation of the x-ray tube with continuous movement of the scan table. The process results in a scanning pattern similar to a coil. HELICAL (SPIRAL) CT Because the slices are connected in a coil-like pattern, individual slices must be created. Part of the image reconstruction process, called interpolation, is used. HELICAL (SPIRAL) CT 7

HELICAL (SPIRAL) CT MULTIDETECTOR CT (MDCT) Instead of using a single ring of detectors, MDCT adds several rows, permitting acquisition of several slices in one sweep of the x-ray tube. Scan times are very short, permitting entire body scanning in just a matter of seconds. The number of detector rows and detector configurations vary with each system and manufacturer. HELICAL (SPIRAL) CT: ADVANTAGES ENTIRE ORGANS CAN BE SCANNED IN A SHORT PERIOD LESS LIKELIHOOD OF MISREGISTRATION ARTIFACTS MULTIPLANAR AND 3D RECONSTRUCTION USING IMAGE DATA IS POSSIBLE 8

5 TH GENERATION CT Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT), also called ultra fast CT, was a major innovation in scanner design. Rather than using a rotating x-ray tube, the scanner itself acts as an x- ray tube. ELECTRON BEAM CT An electron gun in the back of the An electron gun in the back of the scanner directs a fine stream of electrons to a set of target rings in the gantry. The electron-target collision produces several x-ray beams which pass through the patient. There are no moving parts other than the table. 9

ELECTRON BEAM CT EBCT is useful in producing highresolution cardiac images with scan times of between 50 and 100 ms. Cine and flow studies are possible CT DETECTOR ARRAYS Third generation scanners used gas- Third generation scanners used gas filled detectors. Gas detectors use compressed xenon (Xe). Each detector is only 1 mm wide. Ionization caused by the capture of x-ray photons is converted into electrical signals which are sent to an array processor. 10

GAS-FILLED DETECTORS CT DETECTOR ARRAYS Fourth generation scanners use solidstate or gas detectors. Solid-state detectors detect radiation by interaction with photoemissive crystals. The light given off these crystals stimulate photodiodes, converting light into electrical impulses that are relayed to an array processor. SOLID-STATE DETECTOR 11

CONTROL OF SCATTER RADIATION Scatter radiation is controlled by means of proper selection of kvp and the use of pre- and post-patient collimation. PREPATIENT COLLIMATION Prepatient collimation controls the thickness of each scanned slice. Scatter production is reduced when using thinner slices POSTPATIENT COLLIMATION Collimators positioned in front of the detector array keeps scatter that emerges from the patient from reaching the detectors. This helps increase signal-to-noise ratio. 12

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION During a CT scan, an x-ray beam passes through the patient at various angles. The attenuated beam that emerges at each angle (called a projection) is captured by the detector array. IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION The attenuation data (called raw data) is digitized and manipulated by the array processor using a mathematical technique called filtered back projection. 13

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION Back projection is a summation technique that is used to add and average attenuation data. Filtering is used to smooth image irregularities resulting from the scanning process. Unless these irregularities are corrected, the resulting image will have rough edges and streak artifacts. IMAGE DISPLAY CT images are arrayed on a matrix. Each of the pixels within the matrix has a shade of gray that correlates with a numerical value representative of a tissue, fluid or air. These numbers are called CT numbers. CT NUMBERS CT numbers depend on the kvp which CT numbers depend on the kvp which affects the attenuation coefficient of the tissues. Attenuation coefficient (cm -1 ) is the amount of attenuation experienced by x-rays as they go through each linear centimeter of material. 14

CT NUMBERS μ t μ w μ w 1000 CT REFERENCE NUMBERS WATER = 0 AIR = -1000 FAT = -80 MOST SOFT TISSUES = +30 TO +80 CALCIUM > +100 SOLID BONE = +1000 DISPLAYED IMAGE & FIELD OF VIEW The technologist determines at the time of the scan how large or small the displayed image should look. This is called the reconstruction field of view (FOV). 15

DISPLAYED IMAGE & FIELD OF VIEW A small field of view means that the reconstructed image will depict a close-up of the anatomy in question. A large field of view will depict more of the anatomy making details appear smaller on the monitor. CT NECK CT ABDOMEN 16

FIELD OF VIEW & PIXEL SIZE Pixel Size = Field of View Matrix Size FIELD OF VIEW & PIXEL SIZE Given a field of view (FOV) of 20 cm and a 512 x 512 matrix size, what is the size of each pixel? FIELD OF VIEW & PIXEL SIZE Answer: 20 cm x 10 = 200 mm 200 mm 512 = 0.39 mm 17

MEASURES OF CT IMAGE QUALITY SPATIAL RESOLUTION LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION SPATIAL FREQUENCY MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION NOISE LINEARITY SPATIAL UNIFORMITY SPATIAL RESOLUTION The ability to clearly distinguish the borders between tissues. Abrupt changes in tissue composition tend to create loss of detail on CT images. LOW CONTRAST RESOLUTION The ability to distinguish subtle differences in tissue composition. At a 0.5% difference in tissue composition, CT is capable of distinguishing between objects that are 4 mm in size or larger. 18

SPATIAL FREQUENCY The ability of an imaging system to detect small details as measured with a test pattern. For example, if a scanner can resolve a test pattern with a spatial frequency of 12 line pairs per cm (12 lp/cm), what is the smallest size object that the scanner can see clearly? SPATIAL FREQUENCY SPATIAL FREQUENCY Answer: 12 lp/cm = 24 bars and spaces/cm 1 cm = 10 mm 1/24 x 10 mm = 0.42 mm 19

MODULAR TRANSFER FUNCTION A measure of how well a scanner is able to faithfully represent the anatomy scanned (image fidelity). Generally, the smaller the objects scanned, the less faithful the representation of the image NOISE Any number of factors that will diminish the amount of useful information (signal). Slice thickness, kvp, ma and matrix size affect noise. It manifests itself as variation in CT numbers, leading to incorrect information. QUALITY CONTROL WATER BATH PHANTOM (STANDARD DEVIATION TEST) WATER BATH PHANTOM (SPATIAL UNIFORMITY HISTOGRAM) AAPM TEST (LINEARITY) 20

STANDARD DEVIATION A statistical measure of variation. The degree to which individual measurements stray from the average measurement is called the standard deviation STANDARD DEVIATION Std. Dev. = ( x-x ) n 1 2 SPATIAL UNIFORMITY Similar to the test of standard deviation, the results are depicted in a bar chart generated by the CT computer. 21

LINEARITY A test to determine the degree of accuracy of a CT system by identifying objects of varying attenuation coefficients. When the system is functioning correctly, the graphical plot of the CT numbers will form a straight line. FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENT DOSE IN CT VOLUME OF COVERAGE MA AND KVP SLICE THICKNESS SCAN PITCH FILTERING (CONVOLUTION) 2D vs. 3D IMAGING MULTIPLE SCAN AVERAGE DOSE (MSAD) CONCEPT Calculating patient dose in CT is a fairly complex exercise when compared to diagnostic radiography. This is due to the many parameters and imaging techniques used in CT and the fact that many image slices are taken during scanning. 22

MULTIPLE SCAN AVERAGE DOSE (MSAD) CONCEPT In the 1980 s the FDA (Center for Devices and Radiologic i Health) devised d a method to determine dose from CT scanning. The dose taken at the center of a slice is called the CT Dose Index (CTDI). The average dose from multiple slices within a volume of tissue is called the Multiple Scan Average dose (MSAD). MULTIPLE SCAN AVERAGE DOSE (MSAD) CONCEPT When a scan is taken with a pitch of 1 (meaning that t all slices are taken contiguously) then the MSAD is equal to the CTDI. As scan pitch increases, MSAD decreases consistent with the formula: MSAD = CTDI (INVERSE OF SCAN PITCH) PROBLEM Assume a CTDI of 1000 mrem. If spiral CT images are obtained using a table increment (BI) of 10mm per tube rotation and a slice thickness (SW) of 2.5 mm, what is the MSAD? 23

ANSWER CTDI = 1000 MREM PITCH = 10 mm 2.5 mm = 4 MSAD = CTDI x INVERSE OF PITCH MSAD = 1000 x (1/4) = 250 mrem 24