First results from the study of the LHC cycle power consumption

Similar documents
The commissioning of the LHC: first the technical systems, then the commissioning with beam

K O M A C. Beam Commissioning of 100-MeV KOMAC Linac. Korea Multi-purpose Accelerator Complex 양 성 자 가 속 기 연 구 센 터

& Tunnel Cross Section

FCC JGU WBS_v0034.xlsm

10 Project Costs and Schedule

HIGH-ENERGY COLLIDER PARAMETERS: e + e Colliders (I)

vacon ac drives for mining & minerals

LHC MACHINE PROTECTION

Kinetic energy recovery on railway systems with feedback to the grid

Status of the Diamond Storage Ring RF Systems. Morten Jensen on behalf of Diamond Storage Ring RF Group

Running in Luminosity. Mike Lamont Verena Kain

HITACHI INVERTER SJ/L100/300 SERIES PID CONTROL USERS GUIDE

OPTIMAL POLYGEN COOLING CONCEPT FOR ST. OLAVS HOSPITAL IN TRONDHEIM, NORWAY

A. Martinez, A. L. Klebaner, J. C. Theilacker, B. D. DeGraff, M. White and G. S. Johnson

CW-5000/ 5200,1'8675,$/ &+,//(5 86(5 0$18$/

Field experience and best practices in managing MW scale Li-ion energy storage systems coupled to large wind and solar plants

Visions become real. Temperature control and cooling systems. The innovative and reliable solution

Equipment Performance Monitoring

Energy savings in commercial refrigeration. Low pressure control

Recommendations for Performance Benchmarking

Four Year Energy Analysis of the Stockton College Geothermal HVAC Retrofit *

TEA1024/ TEA1124. Zero Voltage Switch with Fixed Ramp. Description. Features. Block Diagram

Energy Dashboards And Report Tool

Design Criteria & Service Goals

1 Multi-channel frequency division multiplex frequency modulation (FDM-FM) emissions

Enhancing Business Performance using Integrated Visibility and Big Data

Technical Guidance and Testing Procedure for Static and Dynamic Demand Response and Battery Storage Providers of Frequency Balancing Services

Tune and Chromaticity Tracking in the Tevatron. C.Y. Tan 09 May 2006

Columbia University Master Planning & Optimization

HEAT PUMP FOR DISTRICT COOLING AND HEATING AT OSLO AIRPORT, GARDERMOEN

Datacenter Site Selection Checklist

300 MW Variable Speed Drives for Pump-Storage Plant Application Goldisthal

Second Place: Industrial Facilities or Processes, New

Large Systems Commissioning

NEW JERSEY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

Renewable Energy Hosting Capacity in Horizon Power Systems. November 2013

Zhao et al. 2.2 Experimental Results in Winter Season The analysis given below was based on the data collected from Nov to Mar. 15, 2004.

KRUGER ENERGY CHATHAM WIND PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING REPORT / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Appendix E. Environmental Noise Impact Assessment

Power Electronics. Prof. K. Gopakumar. Centre for Electronics Design and Technology. Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.

Advanced Photon Source. RF Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Robert M. Lill

Crowne Plaza Copenhagen Towers The world s greenest hotel

Basics electronic speed Governor

Inverter and programmable controls in heat pump applications

Product Name Hexa-Band Cellular SMD Antenna GSM / CDMA / DCS / PCS / WCDMA /UMTS /HSDPA / GPRS / EDGE 800 MHz to 2200 MHz

Variable Frequency Drives - a Comparison of VSI versus LCI Systems

Starting Current Reduction of Residential HVAC System and Peak-Load Impact of Power System: A Case Study

NXL Series Inverters. HVAC Inverters made simple

Current state of plant Functioning as a peak and emergency centre. Statistics Accumulated operating hours:

Operation and Control Microgrid and Distributed Generation. Mohammad Shahidehpour Illinois Institute of Technology

Emissions Comparison for a 20 MW Flywheel-based Frequency Regulation Power Plant

Designed for uptime. Defining data center availability via a tier classification system

Prepared for: Prepared by: Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC Canada) November 2012 CM PROPRIETARY

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F (Question ITU-R 157/9) b) that systems using this mode of propagation are already in service for burst data transmission,

V MW. Your best option for low cost energy production at low and medium wind sites. Federico Gonzalez Vives. Director Technology.

The D-Wave 2X Quantum Computer Technology Overview

Technical Specification for Model RSK2503 (Z)-06A IR Belt Solar Cell Firing Furnace

The function of a power station is to deliver

Wolf Creek Hydropower Rehabilitation Analysis Report

HIGH CURRENT OPERATION OF THE ACSI TR30 CYCLOTRON

Gas Discharge Tube (GDT) Products CG5 and SL0902A Series. CG5 and SL0902A Series

ASTACEA4 Inspect complex/central air conditioning systems

Selecting Receiving Antennas for Radio Tracking

Wind-Diesel Hybrid System Options for Alaska. Steve Drouilhet National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO

Replacing Fuel With Solar Energy

R. GIACHINO, M. ALBERT LHC MACHINE CHECKOUT 2015

Short-term solar energy forecasting for network stability

Data Realty Colocation Data Center Ignition Park, South Bend, IN. Owner: Data Realty Engineer: ESD Architect: BSA LifeStructures

Forecaster comments to the ORTECH Report

3. Time value of money. We will review some tools for discounting cash flows.

SM712 Series 600W Asymmetrical TVS Diode Array

DOCUMENTS AND PARAMETERS PROCESS AND CONTROL

Intelligent control system with integrated electronic expansion valves in an air-conditioning system operating at a Telecom telephone exchange

CyberFortress Data Center at Innovation Park Infrastructure and Topology Guide. Innovation Park Charlotte. NC DRAFT V0.

A wireless sensor network for traffic surveillance

The BESSY HOM Damped Cavity with Ferrite Absorbers. Review of prototype cavity test results, taperedwaveguidesvshomogenouswaveguides

Demand Response Programs

Current and voltage measuring relays

Adapting Gas-Power Generation to New Role in Low-Carbon Energy Systems

AVL FUEL MASS FLOW METER & FUEL TEMPERATURE CONTROL

BIOPOWER 5 CEX. 1 Wärtsilä 10 January 2012 Presentation name / Author

Cleaning Methods of SRF Power Couplers. Mircea Stirbet

Technical Guide No High Performance Drives -- speed and torque regulation

Technical Specification for the Cryogenic Testing of HTS Current Leads

LLRF. Digital RF Stabilization System

State of the Art Energy Efficient Data Centre Air Conditioning

NO-BREAK KS 7e. Concentrated Energy kva (50Hz) 3000 kva (60Hz) DIESEL ROTARY UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Follow up and checkpoints of cable properties

Certified TIA-942 Tier IV Data Center

INVESTIGATION ON AIR-CONDITIONING ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF A TYPICAL COMMERCIAL BUILDING COMPLEX

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE

Linac RF Commissioning with the SNS HPRF Systems

However, industrial applications may utilize a relay, which short-circuits the ICL path after the inrush sequence.

Pure Efficiency. C.C.I.A.A.: N REA Cod. Fiscale e P. IVA: Capitale Sociale versato ,00

LEReC Engineering. J. Tuozzolo, C-AD Chief Mechanical Engineer (LEReC Project Engineer)

Temporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product

10/9/2012. Poultry Farm Water Supply. Alabama Burglar & Alarm System. Industry Upgrades. Drinkers Fans Water Supply

Reliability and Availability Aspects of. the IPHI Project

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE

FLORIDA SOLAR ENERGY CENTER

ESB Networks Response. ERGEG Consultation. Voltage Quality Regulation in Europe

Transcription:

First results from the study of the LHC cycle power consumption FCC I&O meeting 24 th June 2015 Davide Bozzini With the contribution of G. Burdet, B. Mouche, R. Ledru, R.Sterenberg, P. Sollander EDMS 1520642

Outline 1. Terminology 2. LHC Electrical network topology 3. LHC Systems classification 4. Daily average consumption @ 7 TeV and 13 TeV 5. Consumption variation between 7 TeV and 13 TeV 6. Comparison between consumption @ 7 TeV, 13 TeV and LHC design values 7. Active power profile during two runs @ 13 TeV 8. Active power profile during a 13 TeV Ramp-down and a Ramp-up 9. Summary of steady state and peak active powers 10. Conclusion

Terminology Average power [P avg ]: is the mean value of the power consumption during the interval of interest (in our case at least 24 hours, weekly, monthly) Steady state power [P steady ]: Is the mean value of the power during an interval in which the system state variables are considered to be constant (in our case the duration of the: injection, stable beam, TS, etc ) Peak power [p peak ]: the maximum instantaneous power during an interval of interest (in our case: peak during magnets ramp-up) Installed power [P inst ]: the sum of the rated power of the supplied electrical equipment (example on CV) Power profile: is the time evolution of the power acquired through the fastest achievable sampling rate

LHC - Electrical network topology Machine network Radial supply from 66 kv network 66 kv distribution to points LHC 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Point LHC 5 feed from point LHC 6 at 18 kv level To Meyrin MEH59 Tunnel loop (also known as LHC General Services loop) 18 kv network installed in the tunnel and coming to surface on all 8 LHC points Feed from point 1 Operated in closed loop mode Included in the autotransfer system Admissible apparent power 30 MVA To Meyrin ME9

LHC - Systems classification Classification given according to rules defined for EN-EL web energy application Systems Cooling: pumping station, cooling towers, air conditioning, etc,.. Ventilation: tunnel ventilation, chillers, air conditioning, etc Cryogenics: Compressors and cooling stations Magnets and converters: Power converters supplying warm and superconducting magnets Radio Frequency: cavities in point 4, Experiences: CMS, ATLAS, ALICE, LHCb General services: Loads not included in the other systems as : F1, F2, F3, F4-400V sockets distribution, UPS systems, 48 V systems, fire and ODH detection, elevators, cranes,.. Loads to be covered by auto transfer in case of internal of external power outage

Daily average consumption @ 7 TeV and 13 TeV P AVG-14-days-june(2012) = 60.8 MW P AVG-14-days-june(2015) = 67.8 MW = + 7 MW (+12%) Note: 21 MW for the LHC experiences are not included

Daily average consumption @ 7 TeV and 13 TeV 1 TS 2 TS Notes: 1 Probable additional load on the LHC loop by EL operation (TBC) 2 Probable additional power request in SM18 (TBC) Analysis: Major contribution to daily power variation is done by magnets and power converters. Probably directly related to the number of ramp-up and ramp down of magnets and the number of hours of operation of the warm magnets Average daily power consumption during TS is between 48 and 52 MW RF + magnets and converters OFF Cryo decrease of consumption All other systems remains constant

Power consumption variation between 7 TeV and 13 TeV Comparison done on the first 14 days of June (2015 minus 2012) Comparison of the systems daily average power consumption variation: +15 to +20 % for the cryogenics +25 to +60 % for magnets and power converters +10 to +12 % for cooling -20 to +15 % for ventilation -15 to +5 % for radio frequency -10 to +30 % for general services

Comparison between average consumption @ 7 TeV, 13 TeV and LHC design values System LHC design report - 2004 (table 7.1) [MW] EN-EL survey March 2011 (EDMS 1153902) [MW] LHC design 14 TeV (FCC meeting,24 November 2014) [MW] Nov-2012 7 TeV (FCC meeting, 24 November 2014) [MW] June 2012 7 TeV [MW] June 2015 13 TeV [MW] Duration of measurement Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable One month 14 days 14 days Data acquisition Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 10 min average power Stored only if +/- 10% variation compared to last point acquired Copy of data presented on 24 th of November 2014 1min sampling rate 100 kw power variation 1min sampling rate 100 kw power variation Magnets and power converters 18.8 17.4 20 3 3.1 4.7 Cryogenics 48.8 35.0 35 32 30.1 35.9 Cooling 23.7 33.2 20 6 6.2 6.8 Ventilation (32.8 winter) 14 4 3.8 3.6 Radio Frequency 17.9 7.2 18 7 6.6 6.3 General Services 13.6 Included in other systems 20 13 11.0 10.5 Experiments 21.8 23.2 22 21 21 21 Other machine 1.92 Not identified 2.5 0 0 0 Total [MW] 155.6 116.0 151.5 86 81.8 88.8 Estimates / Survey Measurements

Active power profile during LHC run @ 13 TeV The period considered goes from the 13 June (16h30) to 14 June (17h16) P peak = 83 MW 1 1 P steady 6.5 TeV = 70 MW P AVG 68 MW (dotted line) P steady 450 GeV = 63 MW 1 Power variations to be further investigated. Could be real or due to data processing mistakes

Active power profile during a Ramp-down and a Ramp-up Ramp-down and Ramp-up snapshot Physics Dump Ramp down @ injection injection Ramp up Tune squeeze adjust Physics 2 1 P peak = 82 MW P steady 6.5 TeV = 70 MW 3 P AVG = 68 MW (dotted line) P steady 450 GeV = 63 MW 1 Beam energy ramp up. Power increase mainly due to power converters 2 Power start to decrease before start of ramp-down. 3 Transitory period during ramp-down.

Summary of steady state and peak active powers Description Name June 2012 7 TeV [MW] June 2015 13 TeV [MW] Steady state at 450 GeV (injection) P steady 450 GeV Data not retrievable 63 Steady state at 13 TeV P steady 6.5 TeV Data not retrievable 70 Steady state during TS P steady TS 49 50 Peak active power during a LHC run P peak Data not retrievable 81 21 MW for the experiences are not counted and shall be added whenever applicable (i.e. not during TS) Deviation on measured data will be determined by additional measurements Steady state and peak consumptions under nominal LHC operational conditions are the key values for electrical network dimensioning, redoundancy layouts and optimization of network operation (i.e. systems outage in case of reduced power availability)

Conclusion DAQ system for LHC power consumption is now operational and tuned to acquire the maximum data points achievable Data for daily average consumption are sufficient to estimate LHC energy consumption and costs Dimensioning of the FCC network infrastructure require to study more in detail the steady states and peak power consumptions of LHC Definition of individual systems installed power vs. systems operational processes are necessary to define simultaneity factors and power profiles

Thank you for your attention

Annexes

Example: Cooling and ventilation Comparison of power consumption @ 7 TeV, 13 TeV and announced values System Nov-2012 7 TeV June 2012 7 TeV June 2015 13 TeV Cooling 6 6.2 6.8 Ventilation 4 3.8 3.6 Total [MW] 10 10.0 10.4 Cooling and ventilation power needs are stable during LHC operation @ 13 TeV Announced values diverge from measured values Need to use a common terminology (average, peak, steady state, etc )

Power consumption for LHC cooling and ventilation (MW) Installed Power Sum of equipment rated power Cooling 23 Ventilation 52 Total 75 Required power Accounting for back up Cooling 18 Ventilation 39 Total 57 Peak consumption (I) Running LHC in winter conditions Cooling 12 Ventilation 26 Total 38 Peak consumption (II) LHC stopped in winter conditions Cooling 9 Ventilation 25 Total 34 Peak consumption (III) Running LHC in summer conditions Cooling 13 Ventilation 18 Total 31 Average peak consumption over the year Cooling 10 Ventilation 20 Total 30 G. Peon FCC I&O meeting 25.02.2015 17

Systems - Installed active power System Installed active power [MW] Notes Magnets and power converters 39.4 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 Cryogenics 48.4 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 Cooling 23 Provided by system owner Ventilation 52 Provided by system owner Radio Frequency 17.9 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 General Services 13.6 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 Experiments 21.8 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 Other machine 1.92 Max taken from LHC design report - 2004 Total [MW] 218.0 Network - Available active power System Installed active power [MW] Notes LHC - 1 36 1 x 66 kv transformer rating Meyrin load (20 MW) LHC - 2 60.8 2 x 66 kv transformer rating LHC - 4 30.4 1 x 66 kv transformer rating LHC - 6 30.4 1 x 66 kv transformer rating LHC - 8 30.4 1 x 66 kv transformer rating LHC loop 21.8 Limited by loop ampacity Total [MW] 209.8

Impact of TI2 and TI8 on LHC active power profile (1)

Impact of TI2 and TI8 on LHC active power profile (2)