School Accountability Report

Similar documents
School Accountability Report

School Accountability Report

Allen Elementary School

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Douglas County School District Accountability Analysis

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Esmeralda County School District Accountability Analysis

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

STRATEGIC SCHOOL PROFILE Middle and Junior High School Edition. Great Oak School. Oxford School District

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

Advanced Program Information The percentage of students enrolled in advanced programs is a key indicator of school quality at the secondary level.

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

New York State Profile

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

Moberly School District. Moberly School District. Annual District Report Accredited with Distinction.

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

South Dakota DOE Report Card

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

Westview Early Childhood Education Center 1100 Patterson Street, Petersburg, VA 23803

Wolf Point Public Schools Southside School Northside School Junior High School High School

College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation: Statewide Results

The New York State Report Card

High School Graduation Rates in Maryland Technical Appendix

KIPP Los Angeles College Preparatory

The New York State District Report Card. This District s Report Card. Use this report to: Accountability and Overview Report

Introduction: Online school report cards are not new in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) has been

Enrollment Application Inventory

High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act

Sky Mountain Charter Eric Schoffstall A o b u o t u t O u O r u r S c S h c o h o o l C n o t n a t c a t

Elmhurst Community Prep

Parent and Community Survey

Executive Summary. Carlin Combined School

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

Orange County High 201 Selma Road, Orange, VA 22960

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Data Collection and Reporting

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW SCHOOL OF CULINARY ARTS HOSPITALITY AND TOURI PASSAIC 150 PARK AVENUE PATERSON CITY

For Canyon View School

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Richard Wright PCS for Journalism and Media Arts

Iowa School District Profiles. Central City

State of New Jersey

Alliance Environmental Science and Technology High

2014 REPORT CARD DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES OF DATA

San Joaquin County Special Education

Huntsville City. Superintendent Dr. Ann R. Moore

WEST OTTAWA PUBLIC SCHOOLS

KIPP Scholar Academy. Tiffany Moore, Principal West Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90062

IHE Masters of School Administration Performance Report

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

State of New Jersey

Alabama State Board of Education PLAN 2020

iq Academy California Los Angeles School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

How To Improve Your School Performance

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

California Virtual Academy at Los Angeles School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

State of New Jersey

River Islands Technology Academy School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Career & Technical Education Accountability Report

EXPEDITIONARY LEARNING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE. Expeditionary Learning 2010

Methodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015

2. The AEC must be identified in AskTED (the Texas School Directory database) as an alternative campus.

date by June Key initiatives included: Paraprofessionals and Academic specialists

State of New Jersey

South Sutter Charter. Mr. Eric Schoffstall, Director El Centro Blvd. East Nicolaus, CA

Characteristics of Colorado s Online Students

Chapter 10 Federal Accountability

South Carolina State Report Card

Template for Local Grantee Evaluations ISBE 21st Century Community Learning Center Program. II. Overview and History of Program

Data Housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center

John Muir Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Santa Clarita Valley International

CUSTOMER REPORT CARD NAEYC DAY CARE PARENT SATISFACTION SURVEY

Stonegate Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Ocean Grove Charter. Eric Schoffstall, Administrator North Highway Nine Boulder Creek, CA 95006

REPORT CARD THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANNUAL SCHOOL. Airport High School 1315 Boston Avenue West Columbia, SC RATINGS OVER 5-YEAR PERIOD YEAR

California Department of Education. School Accountability Report Card. Reported Using Data from the School Year. Published During

Connecting Education and Economic Development

INSPIRE Connections Academy

How To Ask A School Administrator A Question About Your School

ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Legislative Report Virtual Schools in Iowa Annual Report

Iowa Department of Education. Virtual Schools in Iowa Annual Report. Iowa Department of Education Grimes State Office Building Des Moines, IA 50319

San Francisco Flex Academy

ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan

School Performance Plan

Transcription:

George Elementary School Washoe County School District 1785 Ambassador Drive Tiffany McMaster, Principal Reno, NV 89523 Grade Levels: PK-05 Ph: 775-746-5800, Fax: 775-746-5803 Website: www.westergardschool.org/ 2013-2014 School Accountability Report For more information visit www.nevadareportcard.com Mission Statement The Washoe County School District sets out to create an education system where all students achieve academic success, develop personal and civic responsibility, and achieve career and college readiness for the 21st century. Principal's Highlights Elementary School uses multiple strategies as part of our continuous improvement model to support academic and social growth as students and staff strive for excellence. 73% of 3rd graders, 83% of 4th graders, and 84% of 5th graders met or exceeded standards on the reading CRT test, exceeding the district average. 84% of 4th graders and 84% of 5th graders met or exceeded standards on the Math CRT test, exceeding the district average. Teachers trained on the ELA instructional shifts and math practices to realign instruction to the demands of the Nevada Academic Content Standards. All 5th grade teachers participated in the 21st Century Learning Academy Cohort. PTO and EL Cord grant funds supported 21st Century Learning by purchasing mobile laptop carts for 3rd, 4th and 5th grade. Teachers received SIOP training to ensure we meet the needs of all learners, emphasizing high yield strategies for English Language Learners. All teachers are active members of our Professional Learning Communities embracing the Plan-Do-Study- Act model for supporting best practice. Quarterly student recognition assemblies used to motivate students and celebrate academic success and growth. Participation in the Run for Education resulted in grant funds of $1143 used to support our physical education program. Goals and Objectives Goal 1 In reading, implement Common Core Standards while improving the number of students who are staying up and moving up. Objective(s): Increase current reading proficiency rate of 80% to 84% or higher OR reduce the number of non-proficient students by 17% or more. Goal 2 In math, implement Common Core Standards while improving the number of students making adequate growth to a higher target by moving up or staying up. Objective(s): Increase current math proficiency rate of 81% to 84% or higher OR reduce the number of non-proficient students by 14% or more. Goal 3 In reading, target interventions for students who are English Language Learners to increase the proficiency rate and close the achievement gap. Objective(s): Reduce the achievement gap in reading, specific to the special program achievement gap group of LEP, from 20% (50% below the district average of 70%) to 27%. School Communication Efforts is committed to regular, meaningful two-way communication with parents, families, and the community through: Monthly newsletters sent home with every child and posted to the school website School website regularly updated PTO meetings with grade level presentation emphasizing academic programs and best practice Infinite Campus updates ConnectEd calls as needed Open-door policy for parents to share concerns in a solutions-oriented environment Staff, parents, and students working together with positive behavior supports aligned with school expectations Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 1 of 6

Demographics and Student Information Data are provided by the Nevada Department of Education from the state student information system. Gender, race/ethnicity, and special student populations are reported as of count day. # Am In/ AK Native Ethnicity Asian Hispanic Black White Pacific Islander Two or More Races Male Gender Female # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % State 451,730 4,782 1.06% 25,264 5.59% 183,212 40.56% 44,795 9.92% 162,544 35.98% 5,994 1.33% 25,139 5.57% 232,790 51.53% 218,940 48.47% Washoe 62,986 1,013 1.61% 2,765 4.39% 24,482 38.87% 1,521 2.41% 29,204 46.37% 621 0.99% 3,380 5.37% 32,696 51.91% 30,290 48.09% 656 - - 45 6.86% 111 16.92% 12 1.83% 419 63.87% - - 57 8.69% 348 53.05% 308 46.95% Data as of: Count Day Special Populations # IEP ELL FRL Migrant # % # % # % # % State 451,730 51,946 11.50% 67,836 15.02% 239,170 52.95% 77 0.02% Washoe 62,986 8,470 13.45% 10,028 15.92% 30,063 47.73% 0 0.00% 656 66 10.06% 49 7.47% 118 17.99% 0 0.00% Data as of: Count Day IEP= Students with disablities ELL= Students who are English Language Learners FRL= Students qualifying for Free/Reduced Price Lunch Student Average Daily Attendance (ADA) Student Average Daily Attendance (ADA) is the percentage of the school enrollment in attendance on an "average school day" as of the 100th day of school. All Students Am In/ AK Native Asian Hispanic Black White Pacific Islander Two or More Races IEP ELL FRL State 94.90% 93.30% 97.00% 94.80% 93.60% 94.90% 94.80% 94.80% 93.40% 95.40% 94.40% Washoe 94.80% 93.30% 96.90% 94.70% 93.30% 94.80% 94.00% 94.90% 93.40% 95.20% 94.10% 95.80% - 96.30% 95.50% 95.30% 95.90% - 95.40% 95.60% 95.60% 94.90% ADA Data as of: First 100 days of instruction IEP = Students with disabilities ELL = Students who are English Language Learners FRL = Students qualifying for Free/Reduced Price Lunch Transiency, Truancy, and Discipline Transiency Discipline Transiency Rate** # of Students Habitual Disciplinary Problems Habitual Truants State 26.70% 156 1,900 Washoe 22.80% 29 493 14.90% - 0 Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 2 of 6

Violence to Students Violence to Staff Weapons # of (Suspensions or Expulsions) Dist. Controlled Substances Possession/ Use Controlled Substances Possession/ Use of Alcohol State 5,588 274 440 86 1,248 271 Washoe 1,117 28 96 14 466 147 8 0 0 0 0 0 Reported # of Bullying # of Cyber Bullying Determined to be so after an Investigation Suspension/ Expulsion Reported Determined to be so after an Investigation Suspension/ Expulsion State 3,754 3,189 725 544 532 208 Washoe 899 595 200 26 26 10 3 3 2 0 0 0 Data as of: End of school year Discipline and Transiency incidents are reported at the school where the action occurred. **The purpose of some alternative programs is to enroll students for a short period of time until they can reenroll in a comprehensive school; therefore, transiency rates may be greater than 100% or N/A. Data reported as of the end of the school year. Retention K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % State 655 1.90% 1,027 2.80% 480 1.40% 296 0.90% 133 0.40% 71 0.20% 355 1.00% 510 1.50% 566 1.60% Washoe 60 1.30% 66 1.30% 14 0.30% - - - - - - - - - - 14 0.30% - - - - - - 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Data as of: Count Day Because of the changes in law (NAC 387.659) in 2009-2010 that affected the way credit deficient students are identified, results prior to this date and post this date cannot be compared. Student/Teacher Ratio All Schools# Kindergarten++ 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade State 21:1 20:1 19:1 19:1 20:1 24:1 24:1 24:1 19:1 19:1 Washoe 22:1 22:1 19:1 19:1 22:1 26:1 27:1 25:1 N/A N/A 23:1 26:1 19:1 22:1 23:1 27:1 27:1 N/A N/A N/A Data as of: December 1st "+" Teachers may serve multiple grade levels as needed. Student/Teacher Ratio is reported for the school as a whole. "++" Kindergarten ratios are based on the number of classes, not teachers. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 3 of 6

Summary of Standards-Based Test Performance Nevada uses criterion referenced tests (CRTs), Nevada Alternate Assessment (NAA) and the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to measure student achievement relative to Nevada's academic standards. For grade specific assessment results and other assessment information, refer to the Nevada Report Card Website at www.nevadareportcard.com. ED = Percentage of students performing in the lowest range of achievement (Emergent/Developing) AS = Percentage of students performing in the Approaches Standards range of achievement MS = Percentage of students performing in the Meets Standards range of achievement = Percentage of students performing in the highest range of achievement (Exceeds Standards) K-8 Reading Writing Mathematics Science ED AS MS ED AS MS ED AS MS ED AS MS State 19% 19% 37% 25% 49% 18% 23% 10% 19% 25% 44% 13% 18% 22% 41% 20% Washoe 15% 18% 39% 28% 47% 14% 27% 12% 14% 23% 48% 15% 14% 21% 43% 22% 9% 13% 48% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 14% 53% 27% 7% 16% 54% 23% Data as of: December 1st Per-Pupil Expenditures 2012-2013 The Nevada Department of Education in consultation with In$ite adjusted the formula used to calculate per pupil expenditures beginning with the 2009-2010 Annual Reports of Accountability. Therefore, we have two appropriate comparisons sets; comparisons 2003-04 SY through 2008-09 SY and comparisons of 2009-10 SY and forward. Washoe Total Cost Per Pupil = $8506 District Total Cost Per Pupil = $8274 Instruction Instruction Support Operations Leadership Total Expenditures $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % State $4,799.00 58.00% $968.00 11.70% $1,874.00 22.60% $633.00 7.60% $8,274.00 100.00% Washoe $4,706.00 55.30% $1,292.00 15.20% $1,847.00 21.70% $661.00 7.80% $8,506.00 100.00% $4,102.00 64.20% $913.00 14.30% $1,065.00 16.70% $314.00 4.90% $6,394.00 100.00% Schools only showing up with $0 are new and data was not collected for prior year. NDE in consultation with In$ite adjusted formula used to calculate per pupil expenditures with the Annual Reports of Accountability, rendering comparisons between the year and past years data. Personnel Information Classes Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Highly qualified teachers hold a minimum of a bachelor's degree, are licensed to teach in the State of Nevada, and have demonstrated competence in their teaching area. Data were obtained from the Office of Teacher Licensure as of May 2014. English/ Reading/ Lang. Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies Foreign Languages Arts Elementary % % % % % % % State N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Washoe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A L Poverty Level Teacher Data as of: May 1st (2008-Current) (H) = High Poverty School - defined as being within the bottom quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (L) = Low Poverty School - defined as being within the top quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 4 of 6

Teacher ADA and Licensure Information Average Daily Attendance Teachers Providing Instruction # Pursuant to NRS 391.125 # Pursuant to Waiver # w/ o Endorsement State 95.80% N/A N/A N/A Washoe 95.90% N/A N/A N/A 97.80% N/A N/A N/A Teacher Data as of: May 1st (2008-Current) (H) = High Poverty School - defined as being within the bottom quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch (L) = Low Poverty School - defined as being within the top quartile throughout the state of percentages of students who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch Parent/Teacher Conference Attendance Accountability Year Parent/ Teacher Conference Attendance 2014 98.00% 2013 99.00% 2012 98.10% Data as of: Fall District totals do not include state or district sponsored charter school data. (2008- Current) School NSPF Results: 3 Star Rating Information on the ratings or rankings of schools in the Nevada School Performance Framework (NSPF) can be found via the Nevada School Performance Framework website at http://nspf.doe.nv.gov/ A 3-Star School has some areas of success as well as some areas that need improvement relative to student proficiency and/or student growth on the State assessments. The school has negotiated flexibility with the school district in decisionmaking and, when appropriate, is acknowledged for its successes with public recognition. Performance Indicators Points Earned Points Eligible Growth Measure of Achievement 28 40 Status Measure of Achievement 24 30 Reduction in Achievement Gaps 9 20 Other Indicators 6 10 Total Index Score [Points Earned(67)/Points Eligible(100)] X 100 = 67.00 Note: District totals do not include state or district sponsored charter school data. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 5 of 6

The development of this annual state accountability report is a joint effort among the Nevada Department of Education and Nevada school districts. This report is provided to the public as required by the federal No Child Left Behind Act and NRS 385.347. A comprehensive listing of all accountability data, including student test data, may be accessed on the Nevada Annual Reports of Accountability website at www.nevadareportcard.com. Website:www.nevadareportcard.com Page 6 of 6