DESIGN OF STRUCTURES. Engr. Faizan Tahir

Similar documents
REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Reinforced Concrete Design

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

Formwork for Concrete

Wang, L., Gong, C. "Abutments and Retaining Structures." Bridge Engineering Handbook. Ed. Wai-Fah Chen and Lian Duan Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000

Worked Example 2 (Version 1) Design of concrete cantilever retaining walls to resist earthquake loading for residential sites

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Page 1 of Sven Alexander Last revised SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Chapter 2 Basis of design and materials

RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION GUIDELINE Johnson County, KS

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying. Principles and Practice of Engineering Structural Examination

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Tension Development and Lap Splice Lengths of Reinforcing Bars under ACI

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns under Bidirectional Shear & Axial Loading

Statics of Structural Supports

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

Table of Contents. July

Objectives and Purpose...Page 1 Open Bottom Arch - Flow Model...Page 1 The Pros and Cons of Metal Arch Culverts...Page 2 Positive Features of Arch

K x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Roof Decks 172 B, BA, BV Deck N, NA Deck. Form Decks FD,.6 FDV Deck 1.0 FD, 1.0 FDV Deck 1.5 FD Deck 2.0 FD Deck 3.

FOAMULAR LT40, 400 and 600 insulations with minimum compressive strengths of

BEAMS: SHEAR AND MOMENT DIAGRAMS (GRAPHICAL)

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

Chapter 3 FOUNDATIONS AND FOUNDATION WALLS

Shear Forces and Bending Moments

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

Hunter College school of Social Work Thesis Proposal

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR EARTH RETENTION

Outline MICROPILES SUBJECT TO LATERAL LOADING. Dr. Jesús Gómez, P.E.

NCMA TEK CONCRETE MASONRY FOUNDATION WALL DETAILS. TEK 5-3A Details (2003)

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. The design of any foundation consists of following two parts.

Dimensional and Structural Data for Elliptical Pipes. PD 26 rev D 21/09/05

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

The Verdura Wall check with your local building department

bi directional loading). Prototype ten story

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations

Wisconsin Building Products Evaluation

Analysis and Repair of an Earthquake-Damaged High-rise Building in Santiago, Chile

Design Manual to BS8110

IMPROVING THE STRUT AND TIE METHOD BY INCLUDING THE CONCRETE SOFTENING EFFECT

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

DRAINAGE MATS For Vertical: Flow 15-P For Horizontal: Flow 18-H

Underpinning Systems 14.1 FOUNDATION REPAIR. Helical Piles

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

HOW TO DESIGN CONCRETE STRUCTURES Foundations

DESIGN: (SUBSTRUCTURES, SPECIAL STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS) PART 12 BD 31/01 THE DESIGN OF BURIED CONCRETE BOX AND PORTAL FRAME STRUCTURES SUMMARY

Shear Force and Moment Diagrams

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

Welded Mesh Gabions and Mattresses River Protection Design Guide HY-TEN GABION SOLUTIONS Dunstall Hill Trading Estate, Gorsebrook Road,

Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Transcription:

DESIGN OF STRUCTURES Engr. Faizan Tahir

RETAINING WALLS

Function of retaining wall Retaining walls are used to hold back masses of earth or other loose material where conditions make it impossible to let those masses assume their natural slopes. Such conditions occur when the width of an excavation, cut, or embankment is restricted by conditions of ownership, use of the structure, or economy. For example, in railway or highway construction the width of the right of way is fixed, and the cut or embankment must be contained within that width. Similarly, the basement walls of the buildings must be located within the property and must retain the soil surrounding the base.

Types of retaining walls Free standing retaining walls, as distinct from those that form parts of structures, such as basement walls, are of various types. The gravity retaining wall retains the earth entirely by its own weight and generally contains no reinforcement. It is used up to 10 to 1 ft height. The reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall consists of the vertical arm that retains the earth and is held in position by a footing or base slab. In this case, the weight of the fill on top of the heel, in addition to the weight of the wall, contributes to the stability of the structure. Since the arm represents a vertical cantilever, its required thickness increase rapidly, with increasing height. It is used in the range of 10 to 5 ft height.

Types of retaining walls In the counterfort wall the stem and base slab are tied together by counterforts which are transverse walls spaced at intervals and act as tension ties to support the stem wall. Counterforts are of half or larger heights. Counterfort walls are economical for heights over 5 ft. Property rights or other restrictions sometimes make it necessary to place the wall at the forward edge of the base slab, i.e. to omit the toe. Whenever it is possible, toe extensions of one-third to one-fourth of the width of the base provide a more economical solution.

Types of retaining walls A buttress wall is similar to a counterfort wall except that the transverse support walls are located on the side of the stem opposite to the retained material and act as compression struts. Buttress, as compression elements, are more efficient than the tension counterforts and are economical in the same height range. A counterfort is more widely used than a buttress because the counterfort is hidden beneath the retained material, whereas the buttress occupies what may otherwise be usable space in front of the wall.

Types of retaining walls This is an free standing wall category. A wall type bridge abutment acts similarly to a cantilever retaining wall except that the bridge deck provides an additional horizontal restraint at the top of the stem. Thus this abutment is designed as a beam fixed at the bottom and simply supported or partially restrained at the top.

Earth Pressure For liquid P=wwh, ww is the unit weight of water. Soil retaining structure Ph=Cowh w is unit weight of the soil C0 is a constant known as the coefficient of earth pressure at rest According to Rankin, the coefficient for active and passive earth pressure are Cos Ca Cos Cos Cos Cp Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos Cos For the case of horizontal surface =0 1 sin 1 sin Cah Cph 1 sin 1 sin

Earth pressure for common condition of loading h y 3 1 P Cah wh h y 3 1 p Cawh For Ca Cos

Earth pressure for common condition of loading h 3hh y 3(h h ) 1 P Cah wh(h h )

Stability Requirement 1. Individual parts should be strong enough to resist the applied forces. The wall as a whole should be stable against (i) Settlem ent (ii) Sliding (iii) Overtur ning

Stability Requirement Settlement It is necessary to ensure that the pressure under the footing does not exceed the permissible bearing pressure for the particular soil. By the formula If a q max mi n N MC A I, compression will act throughout the section 3

Stability Requirement Settlement a R v Rv q1, 3 1 Rv R v a R v R v a Rv Rv 4 4 q1, 3 3 1 1 Rv 6R v a Rv 3R v 3 6a q1, Rv Rv q1 4 6a & q 6a Rv when a q1 q Unit dimension in the direction perpendicular to the paper.

Stability Requirement Settlement R v Rv 3 q1, 3 1 3 1 R v R v 1 1 1 6 6 q1, R v R v 3 3 1 1 q1, R v R v q1 & q 0

Stability Requirement Settlement 1 R v q 3a R v q 3a

Stability Requirement Sliding F = Rv F 1.5 Ph Overturning Stabilizing moment Overturning moment

Basis of Structural Design 1. Lateral earth pressure will be considered to be live loads and a factor of 1.7 applied.. In general, the reactive pressure of the soil under the structure at the service load stage will be taken equal to 1.7 times the soil pressure found for service load conditions in the stability analysis. 3. For cantilever retaining walls, the calculated dead load of the toe slab, which causes moments acting in the opposite sense to those produced by the upward soil reaction, will be multiplied by a factor of 0.9.

Basis of Structural Design 4. For the heel slab, the required moment capacity will be based on the dead load of the heel slab itself, plus the earth directly above it, both multiplied by 1.4. 5. Surcharge, if resent, will be treated as live load with load factor of 1.7. 6. The upward pressure of the soil under the heel slab will be taken equal to zero, recognizing that for severe over load stage a non linear pressure distribution will probably be obtained, with most of the reaction concentrated near the toe.

Drainage Reduction in bearing capacity. Hydrostatic pressure. Ice pressure Drainage can be provided in various ways i. Weep holes, 6 to 8 in. 5 to 10 ft horizontally spaced. 1 ft3 stone at the bottom weep holes to facilitate drainage and to prevent clogging. ii. Longitudinal drains embedded in crushed stone or gravel, along rear face of the wall. iii. Continuous back drain consisting of a layer of gravel or crushed stone covering the entire rear face of the wall with discharge at the ends.

Problem A gravity retaining wall consisting of plain concrete w=144 lb/ft3 is shown in fig. The bank of supported earth is assumed to weigh 110 lb/ft3 ø=300 and to have a coefficient of friction against sliding on soil of 0.5. 1 sin 1 sin 30 Ca 0.333 1 sin 1 sin 30 1 sin 1 sin 30 Cp 3 1 sin 1 sin 30 Pah 1 1 Ca wh (0.333 )(110 )(1) 637.36 lb 1 Overturning moment 637.36 10549.44 lb.ft 3

Restoring moment: Moment about toe Component Force Weights Moment arm Moment W1 (6)(1)(144) 864 x 3 59 lb.ft W (1)(11)(144) 1584 x 1 1584 lb.ft W3 1 (4)(144)(11) W4 1 (4)(11)(110) W5 (0.5)(11)(110) 1 3168 1.5 4 3 40 1.5 4 3 8976 lb.ft 10083.33 lb.ft 605 x 5.75 3478.75 lb.ft Rv = 8641 lb M=6714.08 lb.ft 6714.08.53 O.K Safety factor against overturning = 10549.44

Distance of resultant from the toe 6714.08 10549.44 a 1.87 ft 8641 R v ()(8641) The max. soil pressure will be q 3a (3)(1.87 ) q = 3080.57 lb/ft

Sliding Assuming that soil above footing toe has eroded and thus the passive pressure is only due to soil depth equal to footing thickness. 1 1 Pph Cp wh (3)(110 )(1) 165 lb Friction force between footing concrete and soil. F Rv (0.5)(8641) 430.5 lb 430.5 165 1.7 1.5 F.O.S. against sliding = 637.36 O.K

Estimating size of cantilever retaining wall Height of Wall The base of footing should be below frost penetration about 3 or 4. Stem Thickness. Stem is thickest at its base. They have thickness in the range of 8 to 1% of overall height of the retaining wall. The minimum thickness at the top is 10 but preferably 1. Base Thickness Preferably, total thickness of base fall between 7 and 10% of the overall wall height. Minimum thickness is at least 10 to 1 used.

Estimating size of cantilever retaining wall Base Length For preliminary estimates, the base length can be taken about 40 to 60% of the overall wall height. Another method refer to fig. W is assumed to be equal to weight of the material within area abcd. Take moments about toe and solve for x.

Problem Design a cantilever retaining wall to support a bank of earth of 16 ft height above the final level of earth at the toe of the wall. The backfill is to be level, but a building is to be built on the fill. Assume that an 8 surcharge will approximate the lateral earth pressure effect. Weight of retained material = 130 lb/ft3 Angle of internal friction = 35o Coefficient of friction b/w concrete and soil = 0.4 fc =3000 psi fy=40,000 psi Maximum pressure = 5 k/ft soil

Height of Wall Allowing 4 for frost penetration to the bottom of footing in front of the wall, the total height becomes. h = 16 + 4 = 0 ft. Thickness of Base At this stage, it may be assumed 7 to 10% of the overall height h. Assume a uniform thickness t = ( 10% of h ) Base Length h = 0 h = 8

1 P Cah wh(h h ) 1 1 sin 10 0 0 8 1 sin 0.5 0.71 10 0 36 11707. lb h 3hh 0 3 0 8 y 3 h h 3 0 8 8.148 ft

Moments about point a W = (10)(x)(0+8) = 3360 x lb x ( W )( ) P y x ( 3360 x )( ) (11707.)(8.148 ) x = 7.54 ft So base length = 1.5 x x = 11.31 ft Use 11 ft 4 with x = 7-8 and 3-8 toe length

Stem Thickness Prior computing stability factors, a more accurate knowledge of the concrete dimensions is necessary. The thickness of the base of the stem is selected with the regard for bending and shear requirements. P for 18 height and h = 8 1 P Cah wh(h h ) 1 0.71 10 18 (18 8) 9951.1 lb h 3hh' (18 ) (3)(18 )(8) y ' 3(h h ) 3(18 8) 7.41 ft

Mu = (1.7) Py = (1.7) (9951.1) (7.41) = 15388.09 lb.ft (0.85 ) 1fc 87000 b 87000 f fy y (0.85 )(0.85 )(3000 ) 87000 40,000 87000 40,000 0.0371 max 0.75 b 0.0784 1 For adequate deflection control, choose max 0.0139 1 then Rn fy (1 m) fy 40,000 m 0.85 fc 0.85 3000 15.686

1 Rn fy 1 m 1 (0.0139 )( 40,000 )(1 0.0139 15.686 ) 496 Re quired bd Re quired Mn Rn Mn 15388.09 1 0.9 496 Rn 3370.65 d 16.76 Total thickness = 16.7 + 0.5 + 3 = 0.6 Try 1 thickness of base of stem and select 1 for top of the wall

Shear at d d used now = 17.5 = 1.458 At 18 1.458 = 16.54 from top 1 P Cah wh(h h ) 1 0.71 10 16.54 16.54 8 875.9 lb Vu 1.7P 17879.96 lb Vu fc bd 0.85 3000 1 17.5 19553.7 lb Since Vu Vu, So no shear re inf orcement is required.

F.O.S Against Overturning Component Force Arm W1 (5.9)(18)(10)=1787. W ( W3 (18)(1)(150)=700 W4 (11.33)()(150)=3399.00 W5 ( W6 (6.67)(8)(10)=6403. Total 1 )(0.75)(18)(150)=101.5 1 )(18)(0.75)(10)=810 7111.9 3.67 1" 5.9 8.38 Moment 107156.74 3.67+1+0.5=4.9 4981.50 3.67+0.5=4.17 1159 11.33 5.665 3.67+1+0.5=5.17 3.67 1 6.67 8.005 1955.34 4187.7 5157.6 198097.9

P = 11707. lb y= 8.148 ft Overturning Moment = 11707. x 8.148 = 95390.7 lb.ft 198097.9 F.O.S. against overturning.077 O.K 95390.7 Location of Resultant & Footing Soil Pressure Distance of the resultant from the front edge is Righting moment Overturning moment a Total load (righting) 198097.9 95390.7 3.7883 a 7111.9 Middle third = 3.7778 ft, So resultant is within the middle third. q1 Rv ( 4 6a) 7111.9 4 11.33 6 3.7883 q1 11.33

q1= 4771.1 lb/ft < 5 k/ft Rv q (6a ) 14.74 lb / ft So O.K against bearing pressure.

F.O.S. against sliding force causing sliding = P = 11707. lb Frictional resistance = R = (0.4) (7111.9) = 10844.76 lb Passive earth pressure against height of footing 1 sin 1 (10 )() 1 sin 44.8 lb 1 wh Caph 10844.76 44 F.O.S. 0.964 1.5 So key is required. 11707.

The front of key is 4 in front of back face of the stem. This will permit anchoring the stem reinforcement in the key.. x 4756.38 6.43 11.33 x 60.84 lb / ft Total ordinate 635.58 lb / ft Frictional resistance between soil to soil = R 4771.1 635.58 (tan ) (5.087 ) 13191.17 lb

Frictional resistance between heel concrete to soil = R 635.58 14.74 (0.4) (6.43 ) 3309.19 lb 1 Passive earth pressure wh Cph 1 10 h 3.69 1.4 h lb F.O.S. against sliding = 1.5 13191.17 3309.19 1.4h 1.5 11707. h.19 ft So use key of height = -3 =.5

Design of Heel Cantilever Wu = (1.7) (10) (8) + (1.4) [18 x 10 + x 150 ] = 5076 lb/ft W Mu 1 5.76 5.9 88947.76 lb.ft Vu = Factored shear a joint of stem and heel When the support reaction introduces compression into the end region, then critical shear is at a distance d from face of support. However, the support is not producing compression, therefore, critical shear is at joint of stem and heel.

Design of Heel Cantilever Vu = Factored shear a joint of stem and heel = (5.9) (5076) = 30049.9 lb Vc fc bd 0.85 3000 1 1.5 403.11 Vu So depth is required to be increased. Vu 30049.9 6.89 d fc b (0.85 )()( 3000 )(1) Therefore heel thickness 30, d = 7.5

Design of Heel Cantilever Now Wu=(1.7)(10)(8)+(1.4)[(17.5)(10)+(.5)(150)] = 5097 lb/ft 1 Mu (5097 )(5.9) 89315.75 lb.ft. Mu 89315 1 131.3 psi Re quired Rn bd (0.9)(1 )(7.5) 1 1 m min mr n 1 0.00337 fy 00 0.005 fy

As = min bd = 1.8 in Use # 8 @ 5 c/c (As = 1.88 in ) Dev. Length required = 3 top bars so 3 1.3 = 9.9 Available = 5.9-3 = 68.04 O.K Design of Toe Slab x 7.66 4756.38 11.33 x = 315.7 315.7 + 14.74 = 330.44 Self load=(0.9)(1 150)=70 lb/ft { 330.44 4771.1 Wu (1.7) (6801.33)lb/ft Wu = 3801.33 lb/ft 70 = 6531.33 Overload factor = 0.9 d=4-3.5 =0.5 =1.71 ft

Wu (6531.33 )(3.67 ) Mu 43984.9 lb.ft Mu 43984.9 1 Re quired Rn 116.3 bd 0.9 1 0.5 So min will control As = (0.005)(1)(0.5) = 1.3 in Use # 8 @ 7 1 c/c (As = 1.6 in) Available dev. Length = 3.76 3 = 41.01 Required = 3 At a distance d= 0.5 = 1.71 3.67 1.71 = 1.96 x 9.37 4756.38 11.33 x 3933.56 3933.56 14.74 3948.3

3948.3 4771.1 Earth pressure (1.96 )(1.7) 1456.55 lb Vu = 1456.55 70 x 1.96 = 13997.37 lb Vc ( fc )bd 0.85 3000 1 0.5 905.76 lb Vu So no shear reinforcement is required Reinforcement for stem 1 P Cah wh(h h ) 1 0.71 10 17.5 17.5 8 953.43 lb h 3hh (17.5) 3 17.5 8 76.5 7.3 y 3 h h 3 17.5 8 100.5

Reinforcement for stem Mu 1.7 953.43 7.3 117163.1 lb.ft Mu 117163.1 1 45.08 psi Rn bd 0.9 1 (17.5) 1 mr n 1 1 m fy 40,000 15.686 m 0.85 fc 0.85 3000 fy 15.686 45.08 1 1 1 40,000 15.686 0.0117 A s bd 0.0117 1 17.5.457 in 1 Use #9 bars @ 4 c / c ( A s.67 in )

At 5 from top P=1707.3lb y=.30 Mu=6681.34 lb.ft =6.68 k.ft At 10 from top P=47.6 lb y=4.36 Mu=31334.97 lb.ft =31.33 k.ft At 15 from top P=7560.9 lb y=6.9 Mu=80848.7 lb.ft =80.85 k.ft Mu at base 117163.1 lb.ft 1405957. lb.in 117.16 k.ft

With Full Reinforcement C = 0.85fc ba = 0.85 3000 1 a = 30600a lb T = Asfy =.67 x 40000 = 106800 a = 3.49 in At top of wall d = 8.5 3.49 a Mn 0.9 A s fy d (0.9)(106800 ) 8.5 64990.6 lb.in. 54.11 k.ft At base of stem d=17.5 3.49 Mn (0.9)(106800 ) 17.5 1514370.6 lb.in. 16. k.ft

With half Reinforcement C = 0.85fc ba = 0.85 3000 1 a = 30600a lb T = Asfy = 1.335 40,000 = 53400 for #9@9 c/c(as=1.33 in) a = 1.745 in At top of wall d = 8.5 1.745 Mn (0.9)(53400 ) 8.5 366577.65 lb.in. 30.55 k.ft At base of stem d=17.5 1.745 Mn (0.9)(53400 ) 17.5 799117.65 lb.in. 66.59 k.ft

With one-fourth Reinforcement C = 0.85fc ba = 0.85 3000 1 a = 30600a lb T = Asfy = 0.67 40,000 = 6800 for #9@18 c/c(as=0.67 in) a = 0.88 in At top of wall d = 8.5 0.88 Mn (0.9)(6800 ) 8.5 194407. lb.in. 16. k.ft At base of stem d=17.5 0.88 Mn (0.9)(6800 ) 17.5 411487. lb.in. 34.9 k.ft

Thus half bars should be cut at 4-8 distance from bottom and further half bars should be cut 8-8 theoretically from bottom. The actual termination point is found by extending beyond the intersection of capacity moment line with the factored moment diagram a distance of either the effective depth d or 1 bar diameters, whichever is greater.

x 9 1 y 17.5 1 x 9 y 6.63 17.5 d at 4.6 from bottom (y=1.9 ) = 8.5 + 6.63 = 15.13 15 9 x y 4.58 17.5 d at 8.6 from bottom (y=8.9 ) = 8.5 + 4.58 = 13.08 13

bar used # 9 of diameter = 1.18 1 db = 13.54 = 14 Therefore half bars should be terminated actually at 4-8 +15 =15-11 from bottom and further half 8-8 +14 =9 10 bars should be terminated at For tension bars to be terminated in the tension zone, one of the following condition must be satisfied. 1. Vu at the cut-off point must not exceed two-thirds of the shear strength øvn.. Continuing bars must provide at last twice the area required for bending moment at the cut off point. 3. Excess shear reinforcement is provided. Vc ( fc )bd at 1.9 from top

1 Vc 0.85 3000 1 15 1000 16.76 kips Vc 11.17 kips 3 1 1 Vu 1.7 Cah wh h h 1000 10.31 kips Condition(1) is satisfied. Vc 0.85 3000 1 13 14.53 kips Vc 9.68 kips 3 1 1000

1 1 Vu 1.7 Cah wh h h 1000 1 1 1.7 0.71 10 8.9 8.9 8 1000 6.13 kips Condition (1) satisfied so bars can be terminated. The above condition are imposed as a check stress concentration. Shear at bottom = Vu = 1.7 x 9.5343 = 16.1 kips Vc 0.85 3000 1 17.5 1 19.56 kips 1000 Since øvc > Vu so no need of shear reinforcement.

The used should not be less than at any point. This minimum limit, strictly speaking, does not apply to retaining walls. However, because the integrity of retaining wall depends absolutely on the vertical walls, it appear prudent to use this limit un such cases. 00 fy First termination point is 5-11 from bottom where d=14.46 As =1.335 in 00 0.0077 0.005 fy Second termination point is 9-10 form bottom where d=1.44 As=0.6675 in = 0.0045 0.005 Therefore the above condition is satisfied.

Another requirement is that maximum spacing of the primary flexural reinforcement exceed neither 3 times the wall thickness nor 18 in. These restrictions are satisfied as well. For splices of deformed bars in tension, at sections where the ratio of steel provided to steel required is less than and where no more than 50% of the steel is spliced, the ACI code requires a class-b splice of length 1.3 ld. ld for # 9 bars =9 Splice length = 1.3 9 = 37.7 or 3 - O.K

Temperature & shrinkage reinforcement Total amount of horizontal bars (h is average thickness) 1 0.50 A s 0.00bh 0.00 1 0.39 in / ft Since front face is more exposed for temperature changes therefore two third of this amount is placed in front face and one third in rear face. Accordingly A s 0.6 in / ft # 4 @ 9 in. c/c As=0.6 in. 3 1 A s 0.13 in / ft Use # 3 @ 10 in. c/c As=0.13 in. 3 For vertical reinforcement on the front face, use any nominal amount. Use # 3 @ 18 in. c/c Since base is not subjected to extreme temperature changes, therefore # 4@ 1 c/c just for spacers will be sufficient.