Jean-Yves Thibony, Frederic Toumazety and Brian G Wybournez x. Abstract. We give the decomposition of the Kronecker products and the

Similar documents
PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

5.61 Physical Chemistry 25 Helium Atom page 1 HELIUM ATOM

CHAPTER 9 ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND THE PERIODIC LAW

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 20 Jan 1993 ABSTRACT

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson. Handout 7 : Symmetries and the Quark Model. Introduction/Aims

Figure 1.1 Vector A and Vector F

Chapter 10 Electronic Wavefunctions Must Also Possess Proper Symmetry. These Include Angular Momentum and Point Group Symmetries

Review of the isotope effect in the hydrogen spectrum

The three-dimensional rotations are defined as the linear transformations of the vector x = (x 1, x 2, x 3 ) x i = R ij x j, (2.1) x 2 = x 2. (2.

Gauged supergravity and E 10

Chapter 9 Unitary Groups and SU(N)

5.04 Principles of Inorganic Chemistry II

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PHYSICS MASTER OF SCIENCES IN PHYSICS (MS PHYS) (LIST OF COURSES BY SEMESTER, THESIS OPTION)

2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126.

DO PHYSICS ONLINE FROM QUANTA TO QUARKS QUANTUM (WAVE) MECHANICS

Classical Angular Momentum. The Physics of Rotational Motion.

2. Spin Chemistry and the Vector Model

Ernest Rutherford Atomic Model Plum Pudding Model J.J. Thomson 1897

Continuity of the Perron Root

A Primer on Index Notation

5.61 Fall 2012 Lecture #19 page 1

POSTECH SUMMER SCHOOL 2013 LECTURE 4 INTRODUCTION TO THE TRACE FORMULA

Derivation of the relativistic momentum and relativistic equation of motion from Newton s second law and Minkowskian space-time geometry

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Inner Product Spaces

INVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS

Free Electron Fermi Gas (Kittel Ch. 6)

1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state

State of Stress at Point

Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory

CHEM6085: Density Functional Theory Lecture 2. Hamiltonian operators for molecules

Partial Fractions Decomposition

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010

FLAP P11.2 The quantum harmonic oscillator

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 11 Jul 1996

LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR THIS CHAPTER

C 3 axis (z) y- axis

Invariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups

Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups

Notes on Elastic and Inelastic Collisions

MATH APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

Partition Function and Thermodynamic Quantities for the H 2 17 O and H 2 18 O Isotopologues of Water

Orthogonal Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices

Lesson 3. Chemical Bonding. Molecular Orbital Theory

Molecular-Orbital Theory

Chapter 12 Modal Decomposition of State-Space Models 12.1 Introduction The solutions obtained in previous chapters, whether in time domain or transfor

Wavelet analysis. Wavelet requirements. Example signals. Stationary signal 2 Hz + 10 Hz + 20Hz. Zero mean, oscillatory (wave) Fast decay (let)

3 1. Note that all cubes solve it; therefore, there are no more

The Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited

Chapter Test B. Chapter: Measurements and Calculations

Group Theory. 1 Cartan Subalgebra and the Roots. November 23, Cartan Subalgebra. 1.2 Root system

Page 331, 38.4 Suppose a is a positive integer and p is a prime. Prove that p a if and only if the prime factorization of a contains p.

Fundamental Quantum Mechanics for Engineers

Atomic Structure Ron Robertson

Jacobi s four squares identity Martin Klazar

AN EFFICIENT ALGORITHM FOR THE DISCRETE GABOR TRANSFORM USING FULL LENGTH WINDOWS

Section Inner Products and Norms

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 25 Jul 2005

0.33 d down c charm s strange t top b bottom 1 3

POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

Dr Brian Beaudrie pg. 1

Group Theory and Chemistry

Associativity condition for some alternative algebras of degree three

Sign changes of Hecke eigenvalues of Siegel cusp forms of degree 2

Auger width of metastable states in antiprotonic helium II

Lecture 12 Atomic structure

Partial Fractions. Combining fractions over a common denominator is a familiar operation from algebra:

The Determinant: a Means to Calculate Volume

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 17 Sep 2013

Dynamic Eigenvalues for Scalar Linear Time-Varying Systems

5. Orthogonal matrices

MATH 4330/5330, Fourier Analysis Section 11, The Discrete Fourier Transform

2.6 Exponents and Order of Operations

We can express this in decimal notation (in contrast to the underline notation we have been using) as follows: b + 90c = c + 10b

Basic Concepts in Nuclear Physics

Inner product. Definition of inner product

Partial Fractions. (x 1)(x 2 + 1)

Bits Superposition Quantum Parallelism

How To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

Prof.M.Perucca CORSO DI APPROFONDIMENTO DI FISICA ATOMICA: (III-INCONTRO) RISONANZA MAGNETICA NUCLEARE

Math 312 Homework 1 Solutions

Mathematical Induction

By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.

ADDITIVE GROUPS OF RINGS WITH IDENTITY

PQM Supplementary Notes: Spin, topology, SU(2) SO(3) etc

= N 2 = 3π2 n = k 3 F. The kinetic energy of the uniform system is given by: 4πk 2 dk h2 k 2 2m. (2π) 3 0

Basic numerical skills: EQUATIONS AND HOW TO SOLVE THEM. x + 5 = = (2-2) = = 5. x = 7-5. x + 0 = 20.

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

PHYS 1624 University Physics I. PHYS 2644 University Physics II

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors. Jordan canonical form (continued).

Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 7

Atomic structure. Chapter 9

Plate waves in phononic crystals slabs

Moving averages. Rob J Hyndman. November 8, 2009

Transcription:

Products and plethysms for the fundamental harmonic series representations of U p; q) Jean-Yves Thibony, Frederic Toumazety and Brian G Wybournez x yinstitut Gaspard Monge, Universite de Marne-la-Vallee, 2 rue de la Butte-Verte, 93166 Noisy-le-Grand cedex, France zinstytut Fizyki, Uniwersytet Miko laja Kopernika, ul Grudziadzka 5/7, 87-1 Torun, Poland Abstract. We give the decomposition of the Kronecker products and the symmetrized Kronecker squares of all the fundamental representations of the harmonic series of unitary irreducible representations of Up; q). The results for U2; 2) are relevant to two-electron hydrogenic like atoms. 1. Introduction Bohr, in his very rst paper [3], on what has become known as \The Bohr-model" of the atom, made the surprising discovery that the energies of levels of the non-relativistic hydrogen atom could be expressed in appropriate units) as simply E n = 1 n 2 with n = 1; 2; : : : With the advent of the Schrodinger equation for the H-atom it became apparent that each value of n could be associated with orbital angular momenta of ` = 1; 2; : : : ; n 1 and associated with each value of ` there were 2` + 1) values of the angular momentum projection eigenvalues m` leading to each energy level E n being associated with n 1) 2 eigenfunctions. Initially such a high degeneracy appeared surprising. Pauli [7] noted that in a purely Coulombic central eld there was an additional constant of the motion associated with the Runge-Lenz vector and from there was led to the realisation that the observed degeneracies were precisely the dimensions of certain of the irreducible x Supported by a Polish KBN Grant

2 representations of the group SO4) SU2) SU2), in particular those commonly designated as [n 1; ] fn 1g fn 1g. Much later, Barut and Kleinert [2] observed that all the discrete levels of a H- atom spanned a single innite dimensional irreducible representation of the non-compact group SO4; 2) SU2; 2) with the group being referred to as the dynamical group of the H-atom [2, 9]. The Runge-Lenz vector ceases to be a constant of the motion for two or more electrons in a central Coulomb eld [2, 9, 1, 4] and the SO4) symmetry is broken. Nevertheless, it can be useful to consider the n electron states starting with the single irreducible representation of SU2; 2), or more simply U2; 2), and then forming symmetrized n fold tensor products which will be the central problem considered here. For greater generality we shall initially consider the group Up; q) as previously studied [6] by King and Wybourne. After a brief sketch of the relevant properties of Up; q) we tackle the problem of resolving the Kronecker powers of the relevant irreducible representation into its relevant symmetrized powers, namely the problem of plethysms in Up; q). In the process we are able to give closed results for the second powers of the fundamental harmonic series irreducible representations of Up; q) which thus yields, in the case of two electrons, the appropriate spin triplet and singlet states. 2. The fundamental harmonic series irreducible representations of Up; q) Following [6], we may embed the non-compact group Up; q) in Sp2p + 2q; R) whose harmonic representation ~ decomposes as where ~! H = H + 1 m=1 H m + H m ) 1) H = f1; )g 2a) H m = f1; m)g m = 1; 2; : : : 2b) H m = f1 m; )g m = 1; 2; : : : 2c) Upon restriction to the maximal compact subgroup Uq) Up) we have H = f1; g! ") H m = f1; m)g! ") H m = f1 m; )g! ") 1 1 1 f kg fkg) f kg fm + kg) fm + kg fkg) 3a) 3b) 3c)

The harmonic series unirreps fk; )g of Up; q) are generated by considering powers [5] H k of H. Under restriction from Upk; qk) to Up; q) Uk) H! ; fk; )g f; g 4) where the partition ) has not more than p parts and ) not more than q parts and their conjugate partitions ~) and ~) satisfy the constraints [5] ~ 1 + ~ 1 k 5a) ~ 1 p and ~ 1 q 5b) 3 3. Kronecker products for all of the fundamental harmonic series unirreps The Kronecker product of two arbitrary unirreps of Up; q) may be evaluated following [6] to give fk; )gf`; )g = fk +`f s g k f s g` f g; f s g k f s g` fg))g6) where the notation is as in [6] and it is understood that ; ) if 1 ~ p; ~ 1 q and ; )) k+`;p;q = ~ 1 + ~ 1 k + ` otherwise Specialization of 6) to the fundamental harmonic series of Up; q) yields the following cases 7) H 2 = H 2 m = H 2 m = H m H m = H r H s = H r H s = 1 n= 1 n= 1 n= 1 minr;s) x= minr;s) x= f2n; n)g H r H s = f2r; s)g + f2n; n + 2m)g + f2n + 2m; n)g + f2m + k; m + k)g m p=1 m p=1 f2; r + s x; x)g + f2r + s x; x; )g + 1 8a) f2; 2m p; p)g m > 8b) f22m p; p; )g 1 1 8c) 8d) f2 k; r + s + k)g 8e) f2r + s + k; k)g 8f) f2r + k; s + k)g r; s > 8g)

4 H H m = f2; m)g + H H m = f2m; )g + 1 1 f2 k; m + k)g 8h) f2m + k; k)g 8i) 4. Symmetrized squares of the fundamental harmonic representations To separate the Kronecker squares of the representations H m of Up; q) into its symmetric and antisymmetric parts, we rst solve the corresponding problem for the complete harmonic representation H. This is done by restricting the H of U2p; 2q) through the chain U2p; 2q) Up; q) U2) Up; q) S 2 Up; q) : 9) Under U2p; 2q) # Up; q) U2), we know that H! ~ 1 + ~ 1 2 f2; )g f; g : 1) Therefore, we just have to determine the restriction to S 2 of the U2) representations f; g. It is known [1], see also [8]) that the Frobenius characteristic of the decomposition of fmg under Uk) # S k is the coecient of z m in the series h k 1 z = ky j=1 1 1 z j `k ~K ;1 kz)s 11) where K;1 ~ kz) are the cocharge) Kostka-Foulkes polynomials. In particular for k = 2, fmg # S 2 is the coecient of z m in 1 [2) + z11)] 12) 1 z)1 z 2 ) so that fmg! p 2 m)2) + p 2 m 1)11) 13) where p 2 m) is the number of partitions of m into parts not greater that 2, that is, p 2 m) = d m+1e. 2 Taking into account the U2) equivalences f; 1 2 g 2 f 1 2 g, f m; ng m fn + mg and f 1 2 ; g 1 f 1 2 g, we obtain p2 1 2 )2) + p 2 1 2 1)11) for 2 even f; 1 2 g! p 2 1 2 1)2) + p 2 1 2 )11) for 2 odd 14a) p2 m + n)2) + p 2 m + n 1)11) for m even f m; ng! 14b) p 2 m + n 1)2) + p 2 m + n)11) for m odd p2 1 2 )2) + p 2 1 2 1)11) for 1 even f 1 2 ; g! 14c) p 2 1 2 1)2) + p 2 1 2 )11) for 1 odd

5 Now, we have H f2g = @ 1 H + m + H m ) m1h = H f2g + H m + H m ) + @ 1 H m m1h m1 + H r H s + @ 1 H m m1 r;s1 = H f2g + m1 H m H m + R : To extract H f2g from H f2g, we remark that since under Up; q) # Up) Uq) H! ) mf mg fmg the Kronecker square of H can only contain terms whose restriction to Up) Uq) is a sum of representations 2 )f; g such that jj = jj. Clearly, the terms in R are not of this form, and to obtain H f2g, we just need to compute the terms of the form f2 m; m)g in H f2g and to remove the contribution of P m1 H m H m. We know from the above discussion that the multiplicity of f2 m; m)g in H f2g is equal to p 2 m + m) = m + 1 for m even, and to p 2 m + m 1) = m for m odd. On the other hand, H m H m = kf2m + k; m + k)g so that a given f2 m; m)g occurs exactly m times in P k1 H k H k. Removing this contribution, we are left with H f2g = kf22k; 2k)g : 15) Since H 2 = P mf2 m; m)g, we also have H f1 2 g = kf22k + 1; 2k + 1)g : 16) To split the square of H m m 1), we rst observe that under restriction to Up) Uq), it yields a sum of representations of the form 2 )fg fg such that jj = jj + 2m. Next, we proceed as above to extract it from H f2g. We have H f2g = @ Hm + j6=m H j 1 = H m f2g + H m H j + j6=m @ 1 H m j

6 + @ 1 H m j A @ 1 H m+k A + @ 1 H m+j k1 Therefore, to extract H m f2g, we just have to select from H f2g the terms having the correct restriction property to Up) Uq) and to subtract the contribution of the crossed products H m j H m+j j 1). Suppose rst that m 1. Then, H m j H m+j = H H 2m + The terms of this sum are m 1 r=1 H r H 2m r + r1 H r H 2m+r : 17) H H 2m = kf2 k; 2m + k)g ; 18a) r H r H 2m r = 2m i; i)g + f2 k; i=1f2; 2m + k)g ; 18b) k H r H 2m+r = kf2r + k; 2m + r + k)g 18c) so that H m j H m+j = m 1 i=1 m i)f2; 2m i; i)g + km + k)f2 k; 2m + k)g : 19) Now, the multiplicity of f2; 2m i; i)g in H f2g is p 2 2m 2i) = m i+1 for i even, and p 2 2m 2i 1) = m i for i odd. Similarly, the multiplicity of f2 k; 2m + k)g in H f2g is equal to p 2 2m + 2k) = m + k + 1 for k even, and to p 2 2m + 2k 1) = m + k for k odd. Finally, we are left with H m f2g = bm=2c i=1 Similarly, we obtain H m f1 2 g = Likewise, H m f2g = H m f1 2 g = f2; 2m 2i; 2i)g + kf22k; 2m + 2k)g : 2a) bm 1)=2c i= bm=2c i=1 f2; 2m 2i 1; 2i + 1)g + kf22k + 1; 2m + 2k + 1)g 2b) f22m 2i; 2i; )g + kf22m + 2k; 2k)g ; 2c) bm 1)=2c i= f22m 2i 1; 2i + 1; )g + kf22m + 2k + 1; 2k + 1)g 2d)

7 5. Conclusion We have been able to obtain complete results for all the Kronecker products, and their symmetrized squares, for all the fundamental harmonic unirreps of Up; q) expressing them in a compact closed form. The plethysms of the square of the unirrep H for U2; 2) give the complete set of U2; 2) unirreps that arise in a two-electron hydrogenic-like atom with the symmetric part describing the spin singlets S = ) and the antisymmetric part the spin triplets S = 1). The groundstate 1s 2 1 S) is the rst level of an innite tower of states associated with the f2; )g unirrep while the lowest 3 SP level is the rst level of an innite tower associated with the f21; 1)g unirrep. A complete account of the twoelectron hydrogen like states remains to be considered but knowing the relevant U2; 2) unirepps is a signicant beginning. For an n electron hydrogen-like atom n > 2) the resolution of plethysms of the type H fg ` n) is a formidable task and complete results of the type considered herein cannot be expected. References [1] Aitken A C 1946 Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 2) 7 196 [2] Barut A O and Kleinert H 1967 Phys. Rev. 156 1541 [3] Bohr N 1913 Phil. Mag. 476 [4] Butler P H and Wybourne B G 197 J. Math. Phys. 11 2519 [5] Kashiwara M and Vergne M 1978 Inventiones Math. 31 1 [6] King R C and Wybourne B G 1985 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 18 3113 [7] Pauli W 1926 Z. Phys. 36 336 [8] Scharf T, Thibon J-Y and Wybourne B G 1993 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 7461 [9] Wybourne B G 1974 Classical groups for physicists New-York: Wiley) [1] Wulfman C E 1971 Group theory and its applications Vol II E M Loebl Ed New York: Academic Press) pp 145-147