COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N



Similar documents
Napa River Restoration Projects

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

Steelhead Recovery in San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed

Sand and Silt Removal from Salmonid Streams

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Year Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

UTILITIZATION OF ECOHYDROLOGIC MODELS IN FLOODPLAIN FISH PASSAGE AND HABITAT RESTORATION EVALUATION

River Wensum Restoration Strategy Swanton Morley Restoration Scheme Reach 14a

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration

Plumas Watershed Forum. Review of Ongoing Projects. Updated 10/1/008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

Outlet stabilization structure

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Black Canyon Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. P Proposed Fish Passage Study Plan September 2012

NID statement Agreement Disagreement Auburn Ravine: During irrigation and nonirrigation

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Waterway Technote Drains

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

NATURAL RESOURCE RESTORATION LESSON PLAN Fix It!

Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration

Post-Flood Assessment

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County

Coastal Monitoring Program for Salmon and Steelhead

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

2.0 BASIC CONCEPTS OF OPEN CHANNEL FLOW MEASUREMENT

Estabrook Dam A Discussion of Alternatives. Public Scoping Meeting June 5, 2014

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Neversink River East Branch

Southern California Steelhead Recovery Plan Summary

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

121 FERC 62,167 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Utility District No. 1 of Project No Chelan County

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AT HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS Volume 1. Current Practices for Instream Flow Needs, Dissolved Oxygen, and Fish Passage

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

GUIDELINES FOR SALMONID PASSAGE AT STREAM CROSSINGS

Peter F. Ffolliottl and Malchus B. Baker, Jr.2

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

Resolving complex issues with large scale river restoration; a case study: the San Joaquin River in California

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

Streambank stabilization, streambank fencing, nuisance species control, riparian zone management


Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

BIG CREEK Nos. 1 AND 2 (FERC Project No. 2175) VOLUME 1 (BOOK 1 OF 27 BOOKS) INITIAL STATEMENT, EXHIBITS A, B, C, D AND H (PUBLIC INFORMATION)

Transcription:

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N Submitted by the National Park Service Point Reyes National Seashore Point Reyes Station, California, 94956 Project Description: Muddy Hollow Creek lies within the central California coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) and provides critical habitat for steelhead trout (Oncorynchus mykiss), a federally threatened species. National Park Service (NPS) surveys within Muddy Hollow Creek confirmed the presence of O. mykiss in 1997. It is likely that some component of the surveyed population is oceangoing. Prior to NPS acquisition of the land in the 1960 s, an 80 culvert was installed to pass an access road over Muddy Hollow creek. Over time the culvert failed, creating fish impediments, elevating sediment load, and diminishing streambed stability. Removal of the culvert, or daylighting, was performed to restore hydrologic connectivity and to reduce the long-term maintenance requirements associated with culvert operation. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) designed a 2-step vortex boulder weir fish passage that was used to replace the culvert. As well as enhancing fish migration routes, the design allows for stream gradients to be maintained, stabilizes banks, and provides habitat for developing juvenile salmonids. The culvert was removed and recycled, and 1 to 4 ton boulders were installed to attain the desired intent of the project. Mitigating actions taken by NPS included the removal of all fish from the project site, diversion of water flow from direct impact, and the installation of fish fences upstream and downstream of project site to prevent fish access during the project. Revegetation and erosion control efforts included sprigging of willow stakes, alder and Juncus sp. transplants, installation of curlex bundles, and the redistribution of leaf litter and debris to break surface water flow patterns. The purpose of this report is to summarize the hydrologic performance and effectiveness of the fish passage structure in its first year of operation. Since project completion, NPS has monitored the following parameters at the project site: flow conditions, stream levels, structural integrity, the fishery resource, revegetation, and sedimentation. NPS staff will continually monitor the project site in coming winters and will prepare a similar document in 2002 and 2003. Permits were obtained from the appropriate regulatory authorities including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, National Marine Fisheries Service, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2000-2001 Hydrologic Conditions Rainfall was light in water year 2000 (approximately 60% of normal) and ranged from 15 to 24 inches at various rain gages located on the park. NPS staff monitored flow conditions at the Muddy Hollow project site at the completion of the project, and in close proximity to the storm events of winter 2000 2001 (Table 1). Stream flows were taken at the upstream weir pool tail-out with a Marsh-McBirney Flomate Model 2000 portable Flowmeter. Velocities were recorded at either every foot or half-foot depending on total stream width. Event flows were calculated in cubic centimeters per second (CFS). 1

Table 1 Flow Table for Muddy Hollow Culvert (winter 2000-2001) Date Flow (CFS) December 18, 2000 0.31 January 12, 2001 1.43 February 12, 2001 2.23 February 21, 2001 5.24 February 24, 2001 8.98 April 19, 2001 0.60 From these data, a rating curve for Muddy Hollow has been developed so NPS staff can interpolate flow conditions during the course of the water year (Chart 1). Rating curves will be developed on an annual basis and be submitted with subsequent reports. Water levels recorded by a Global WaterLogger WL-14 are entered into the logarithmic equation to determine correlated flow conditions at the project site. The Global WaterLogger WL-14 has recorded stream water levels since its installation in December 2000 and will operate indefinitely. Chart 1 Rating Curve Water Year 2000 Measured Flows 10 1 0.1 Muddy Hollow Rating Curve Water Year 2000 y = 282.99Ln(x) - 732.87 R 2 = 0.9732 13.2 13.4 13.6 13.8 NPS Staff Plate Readings Flow Log. (Flow) The fish passage structure has performed well in response to the flow conditions of this past winter. Both boulder weirs are maintaining position and remain stable. Areas of scour, small amounts of gravel deposition, and revegetation have occurred on a continual and self-maintaining basis since the completion of the project. Longterm stability and success of the cross-vein structures is tied to the recruitment and maintenance of natural bedload within the system. The structure drops several feet in elevation and is subject to significant scour and flow velocity. The balance against scour is the recruitment and replacement by upstream bedload. In the first year following construction, stream flow induced scour and natural bedload material was recruited from upstream, stabilizing the structure. Revegetation and Erosion Control Efforts Increased water temperature can negatively impact fish success. Providing adequate shade and cover for salmonids at the project site is an important concern for NPS staff. Shade production and associated water temperature reductions at the site are long-term goals of the CSRP. Revegetation efforts taken by NPS include: fifty willow plantings, ten alder transplants, transplant of Juncus sp., and the distribution of leaf litter and woody debris to break up surface flow patterns. 2

Concluding Remarks It is the goal of the NPS that the Muddy Hollow restoration site regains as much of its natural character and functionality as possible. This includes the return of healthy salmonid populations, decreased sedimentation rates, revegetation, and increased water quality. Returning a piece of stream to productive use by anadromous fish is an immediate increase to the potential success of a salmonid population. The benefits to the fishery resource are the increased access to the upstream reaches of the creek and the increased habitat that the structure provides. NPS predicts that the restored habitat will recuperate to a fuller extent as more time elapses from the date of project completion. Thus far, the pool-riffle-pool habitat created by the project has provided high winter flow refugia and summer rearing habitat, and has the potential to provide spawning areas for adult fish. The fish passage structure also provides suitable habitat for other aquatic species, which are important to the overall integrity of the system. Flow conditions following this first year of operation indicate that the structure will maintain the hydrologic and geomorphic characters needed to sustain continued and effective use. Geomorphic surveys in upcoming years will help NPS staff better determine the levels of bedload recruitment that the upper reaches of the creek can provide to the structure, which is important for a self-maintaining weir structure. The NMFS designed structure has allowed NPS staff to successfully restore a section of Muddy Hollow creek that would otherwise have remained impaired. As this was a relatively mild winter in regards to rain fall, the structural integrity of the structure will be monitored closely over the next few years. As well, NPS staff will continue to monitor the fisheries, revegetation, and hydrologic activity of the site on an annual basis. NPS staff hopes to use similar structures at alternative restoration sites throughout the park. Based on the performance of the two structures in place thus far (see Cheda Creek Compliance Report, File # 25315N), NPS staff support the use of the NMFS vortex-boulder weir fish passage structure as implemented at Point Reyes National Seashore. Photographic Documentation The following pages contain photographs from the fish passage structures first year of operation: DETERIORATING CULVERT Failed Culvert and Fish Impediment 3

Culvert Removal CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS Date: November & December, 2000 Flow: 0.31 cubic feet / second (December18) Installation of Vortex Weir Downstream Weir just after project completion 4

FIRST STORM EVENT January 8 th 11th, 2001 (rainfall = 2.5 ) Flow: 1.43 (01/1101) cubic feet / second Downstream Weir Upstream Weir Flow over Apex Boulder Upstream Weir 5

SECOND STORM EVENT February 17 th 22nd, 2001 (Rainfall = 3.5 ) Flow: a.) 5.24 (02/21/01) cubic feet / second b.) 8.98 (02/24/01) cubic feet / second Downstream Weir Upstream Weir Mid-Structure Riffle 6

LOW FLOW AND REVEGETATION EFFORTS No Rain fall since 03/05/01 Flow: a.) estimated at 0.15 (06/20/01) cubic feet / second b.) 0.60 (04/19/01) cubic feet / second 7