Wood s Ranch Olive, Almonds, & Vineyard Potential /- Acres Zamora, CA

Similar documents
WA Department of Ecology Water Quality Issues in the Dungeness Watersheds. Public Information

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CHEROKEE SUBINVENTORY UNIT

KERN COUNTY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT FILING MINISTERIAL OIL AND GAS CONFORMITY REVIEW

OSU Extension FACT SHEET

GIS MAPPING FOR IRRIGATION DISTRICT RAPID APPRAISALS Daniel J. Howes 1, Charles M. Burt 2, Stuart W. Styles 3 ABSTRACT

Increasing water availability through juniper control.

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

Appendix A: Affordable Housing Site Inventory

NATURAL REGIONS OF KENTUCKY

nd Street, Manhattan Beach 22,216 SF of Land 9,000 SF of Existing Buildings

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

NATURAL RESOURCES & NATURAL FEATURES

CONTENTS ABSTRACT. KEYWORDS:. Forest ownership, forest conversion.

Michigan Department of Natural Resources Oil and Gas Leases Frequently Asked Questions

Agricultural Conservation Easements and Farmland Trusts

ANSWERS TO COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IN KANSAS

HOW AGRICULTURAL PROPERTY

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS. For a map of this information, in paper or digital format, contact the Tompkins County Planning Department.

Negotiating Pipeline Easements

A SEISMIC OIL AND GAS PRIMER by Kevin B. Hill

8.1 APPENDIX A. SUBDIVISION DATA REQUIREMENTS

is pleased to offer via Sealed Bid Sale

MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES DELINEATION REPORTS

Weed Survey and Mapping

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

SESSION 8: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MAP PROJECTIONS

Applying For the Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP)

Owned and operated by Ontario farmers

LAND AT BROW NELSON DALSTON, CARLISLE CA5 7LE

Prioritizing Riparian Restoration at the Watershed, Reach and Site Scales. Richard R. Harris University of California, Berkeley Cooperative Extension

Emergency Conservation Program

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

LAND USE ELEMENT APPENDIX

ASSESSOR S CALENDAR. When in session, the board of county commissioners may cancel property taxes which for any lawful reason should not be paid.

Maps A Primer for Content & Production of Topographic Base Maps For Design Presented by SurvBase, LLC

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

USDA Farm Program Agencies

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

Data Center Due Diligence List

STATEMENT OF SHARON BUCCINO SENIOR ATTORNEY NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL WASHINGTON, DC

Earls Court Farm Worcester

North Carolina s Forestry Present-Use Valuation (PUV) Property Tax Program

Pennsylvania's Clean and Green Program

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUMMARY OF ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

Fayette County Appraisal District

Statement of Purpose: Perfect R.S rights providing public access to public lands while protecting private property rights.

Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG)

Warehouse & Parcel Adjoining Lumpkin County Airport

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

LOW INTEREST LOANS FOR AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION

Frequently Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions

National Register of Historic Places: GIS Webinar Cultural Resource GIS Facility National Park Service June 2012

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Plan

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

GROUNDWATER BANKING AN AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS APPROACH FOR WATER SECURITY IN CALIFORNIA

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

BID DATE Before 3:00 PM on Thursday, August 27, 2015

Phoenix Biological Consulting Providing proactive biological solutions throughout southern California

Managing Assets and the Important Role of GIS and GPS. Arthur Astarita, Water Resource Specialist

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

It was my assignment to physically inspect the 8 trees on site near the proposed construction,

Chapter 4 FINANCIAL REWARDS: WHAT PROGRAMS COMPENSATE LANDOWNERS

Realist A Quick Start Guide for New Users

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

How to Appraise Agricultural Land

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

The Resilience of Nature. Mount St. Helens Eruption and Recovery

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. Walgreens Drug Store 3315 South H Street Bakersfield, CA 93304

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ORDINANCE (CAP LAWS OF SARAWAK, 1958 Ed.)

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

Gunnison County Web Map

California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program 2004 FIELD REPORT

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

Range Livestock Industry

CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 2009 GENERAL RATE CASE CHAPTER: 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF APPLICATION

Natural Gas Pipeline Safety in Ohio

MAPPING MINNEAPOLIS URBAN TREE CANOPY. Why is Tree Canopy Important? Project Background. Mapping Minneapolis Urban Tree Canopy.

Multi-Family Investment Offering in Los Angeles

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Real Property Market Value Summary Appraisal Report

PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Slope Density. Appendix F F-1 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE DISCUSSION OF SLOPE

Inquiring Minds Want to Know: Questions Landowners Should Ask in Negotiations with Companies Seeking Easements

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN


GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Lecture 11: Land Division Systems

APPENDIX G. California Coastal Commission & Conservancy Accessibility Standards

PRESENT-USE VALUE PROGRAM GUIDE

USE OF GIS AS A REAL TIME DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR IRRIGATION DISTRICTS. Gabriele Bonaiti, Ph.D. 1 Guy Fipps, Ph.D., P.E.

Blaine Hanson Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis

Transcription:

Wood s Ranch Olive, Almonds, & Vineyard Potential 161.26+/- Acres Zamora, CA Presented By:

Wood s Ranch Olives, Almonds, & Vineyard Potential 161.26+/- Acres Yolo, CA Location: This ranch is located on the west end of Road 16 SW of Zamora, CA. From Zamora go South on road 99W. Turn South West on Road 96 just South of Mezgers Trucking. Road 96 will dead end into Road 16. Go West on Road 16 and property is at the end of the road behind a locked gate. The ranch is an easy commute to Sacramento, Vacaville, and the SF Bay Area. APN#: Yolo County Assessor s Parcel Number 055-220-003 Ingress & Egress: Uses: Views: Farmable Acres: Irrigation: Available Docs: Power: The property is behind a locked gate at the end of a county road. There is an easement road that travels through to the next property to the west. The Dunnigan Hills are rapidly being developed into vineyards, olive orchards & almonds orchards. The property offers incredible views of the Sacramento Valley. On a clear day you can see the snowcapped Sierra Mountain Range and at night the bright lights of Sacramento. There are approximately 125 acres that can be planted without moving any dirt. Additional acreage can be reclaimed by altering the topography of the remaining acreage. There is an ag well that produces 2,500gpm. This well is 750ft deep and was drilled in 2014. It produces more than enough water to irrigate the entire ranch. We will provide qualified buyers with soil samples, water quality samples, a well log, and well test pump results upon request. There is 3 wire PG&E power located along the north end of the subject property. If one were to have the desire to build a custom home, bringing power to a building site would be relatively inexpensive.

Leases: There is a lease in place on a fraction of the easterly border. A neighbor inadvertently planted an almond orchard on 0.8 acres of the subject property. Taxes: Oil, Gas & Mineral Rights: Price: Terms: Comments: This property is in the Williamson Act. The property taxes will remain low at the close of escrow. All oil, gas, and mineral rights owned by the seller will transfer to the buyer at the close of escrow. $1,495,000 or $9,270 per gross acre $1,495,000 or $11,960 per farmable acre Cash at the close of escrow This property is approximately 1/3 naturally level and 2/3 gently rolling hills. The property has an all-weather county maintained road and electricity along 1 of its borders. It offers beautiful views, a highly productive ag well in an area known for almond production. The property taxes are and will remain low making this an inexpensive property to own with a lot of upside potential. The property is located within 10 miles of an olive press, winery, and a new almond huller.

Photo Gallery All Year Access Road goes through the north end of this property. This ranches gently rolling hills make it ideal for olives, almonds, and grapes. The neighbors have a thriving almond orchard next door.

The properties western edge is just beyond the cluster of trees in the middle of the picture. A large portion of this farm is suitable for permeant crops There are several high yielding almond orchards between the subject property and Interstate 5. The interstate runs between the long warehouse to the left and the silos to the right in the rear of this photo The snowcapped Sierra s and the Sutter Buttes can be seen from this property. It s an ideal site with spectacular views for a custom home!

121 52' 43'' W Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California (Woods Ranch) 121 52' 3'' W 38 45' 36'' N 597500 597600 597700 597800 597900 598000 598100 598200 598300 38 45' 36'' N 4289500 4289600 4289700 4289800 4289900 4290000 4290100 4290200 4290300 4290400 4290500 4290600 4290700 4289500 4289600 4289700 4289800 4289900 4290000 4290100 4290200 4290300 4290400 4290500 4290600 4290700 38 44' 54'' N 597500 597600 597700 597800 597900 598000 598100 598200 598300 598400 38 44' 54'' N 121 52' 43'' W N Map Scale: 1:6,310 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 300 600 1200 1800 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 121 52' 3'' W Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/26/2014 Page 1 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California (Woods Ranch) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points Capability Class - I Capability Class - II Capability Class - III Capability Class - IV Capability Class - V Capability Class - VI Capability Class - VII Capability Class - VIII Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Yolo County, California Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 25, 2014 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 3, 2010 Apr 29, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/26/2014 Page 2 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California Woods Ranch Irrigated Capability Class Irrigated Capability Class Summary by Map Unit Yolo County, California (CA113) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI CtD2 Corning gravelly loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, eroded 6.3 3.9% SlD SmE2 Sehorn cobbly clay, 2 to 15 percent slopes Sehorn-Balcom complex, 15 to 30 percent slopes, eroded 3 43.4 27.0% 110.9 69.0% Totals for Area of Interest 160.7 100.0% Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/26/2014 Page 3 of 4

Irrigated Capability Class Yolo County, California Woods Ranch Description Land capability classification shows, in a general way, the suitability of soils for most kinds of field crops. Crops that require special management are excluded. The soils are grouped according to their limitations for field crops, the risk of damage if they are used for crops, and the way they respond to management. The criteria used in grouping the soils do not include major and generally expensive landforming that would change slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils, nor do they include possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Capability classification is not a substitute for interpretations that show suitability and limitations of groups of soils for rangeland, for woodland, or for engineering purposes. In the capability system, soils are generally grouped at three levels-capability class, subclass, and unit. Only class and subclass are included in this data set. Capability classes, the broadest groups, are designated by the numbers 1 through 8. The numbers indicate progressively greater limitations and narrower choices for practical use. The classes are defined as follows: Class 1 soils have few limitations that restrict their use. Class 2 soils have moderate limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require moderate conservation practices. Class 3 soils have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require special conservation practices, or both. Class 4 soils have very severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants or that require very careful management, or both. Class 5 soils are subject to little or no erosion but have other limitations, impractical to remove, that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 6 soils have severe limitations that make them generally unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to pasture, rangeland, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 7 soils have very severe limitations that make them unsuitable for cultivation and that restrict their use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife habitat. Class 8 soils and miscellaneous areas have limitations that preclude commercial plant production and that restrict their use to recreational purposes, wildlife habitat, watershed, or esthetic purposes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/26/2014 Page 4 of 4