A TRANSPORT MODEL FOR THE ATHENS OLYMPIC GAMES 2004

Similar documents
Restructuring the public transport network in times of financial crisis: Solutions from Thessaloniki

1 st RESOLUTE Workshop Florence

Ticketing and user information systems in Public Transport in Thessaloniki area

Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology 13, No 2, (2012)

Transport planning in the Stockholm Region

Parking Management. Index. Purpose. Description. Relevance for Large Scale Events. Options. Technologies. Impacts. Integration potential

Road tolls to pay for the Metro construction in Athens possible way towards free public transport

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Urban Transport Issues in Egypt

How To Plan A City Of Korea

Submission from Living Streets Aotearoa Wellington City Public Transport Spine Study

LATEST TECHNIQUES IN TRANSPORT FORECASTING AND MICRO-SIMULATION WITH EXAMPLES FROM AROUND ASIA

The New Mobility: Using Big Data to Get Around Simply and Sustainably

Financing Public Transport

Traffic Forecasting Prospects for high speed rail in Poland forecasting demand

Using EMME/2 in environmental studies in the Czech Republic

Network development and design

INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT

Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Mobility

EMTA BAROMETER OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN EUROPEAN METROPOLITAN AREAS (2004)

Tools and Operational Data Available st RESOLUTE Workshop, Florence

moving Vienna region! ÖBB suburban & urban trains

PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK DESIGN AND APPRAISAL A CASE STUDY OF PORTO

1st CONFERENCE IN ETHNOMUSICOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF MUSIC Methods, approaches and perspectives for the study of music within culture

Transport Demand Management

11. Monitoring Performance monitoring in LTP2

Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council

Ohio Standard Small/Medium MPO Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Theoretical Training May 10-11, 2006 Abridged to Freight Focus Sept 2010

Integrated Public Transport. Planning. National workshop on promoting sustainable transport solutions for East Africa

Growth of Addis Ababa

Shared Mobility Systems. Prof. Ing. Adrian Muscat, University of Malta D-Air Seminar, Intercontinental, St. Julians, Malta

Tailoring transport choices

TITLE A CTS FOR THE NEW ROME EXHIBITION

Min-Bus Taxis & Pedestrians in Africa: Challenges and Solutions

Hamilton Truck Route Study

We would be pleased to discuss these issues with you at your convenience.

Multimodal Services in Vienna. Dr. Michael Lichtenegger, Neue Urbane Mobilität Wien GmbH

Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe. Brest. Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat

Network development and design

Travel Expenses. June Guidelines. Definitions

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses

GTA Cordon Count Program

Transit Smart Card Data Research: Thoughts and Perspectives

Transportation Education Series: Travel Demand Modeling. David Reinke November 2012

Rome Mobility Agency: ITS for Large Events Management and the EU Stadium Project

Journey to Work Patterns in the Auckland Region

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

TOWARD A SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY

Data Collection and Sampling issues -Preparing Low Carbon Mobility Plan

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Results of DEMOCRITOS project The case study of GENOVA

Supplier conference. Passenger counting solutions. Oslo, 14th January 2016

4. Home postcode (optional - only the first half of your postcode is required)

Guidelines for travel expenses related to medical and hospital services, medical reviews and return to work case conferencing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about DART

AT Metro Monthly Patronage May 2015

AF1 Urban Environmental Planning WP 5 Urban Transport

Transport and tourism investments for hosting big events: the case of the 2013 Mediterranean Games in Volos, Greece

The challenge: tranform the Urban Mobility model to make Milano a more Livable city. Agency for Mobility, Environment, Territory - City of Milan

How To Understand The Relationship Between A Line And A Passenger Car

AUTONOMOUS CARS: 25 MEASURES FOR 2025

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Estimation of Travel Demand and Network Simulators to Evaluate Traffic Management Schemes in Disaster

URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT PLANNING IN TEHRAN AND THE OUTCOME OF THE IMPLEMENTED BRT LINES

CITEAIR II. Marco Cianfano. ATAC SpA Mobility Agency for the Municipality of Rome. Paris

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

INTEGRATION AND REGULATORY STRUCTURES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT CASE STUDY BRUSSELS CAPITAL REGION

Travel and Accommodations

01LG Corp. Overview. Korea Employee 125,000 Plants 40 R&D Center 70. Overseas Employees 88,000 Local subsidiaries Plants : 50 -R&D: 20

MODELING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND USING EMME/2 A CASE STUDY OF HIROSHIMA URBAN AREA

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Computer Science 52 (2015 )

Andrea Ricci ISIS Is/tuto di Studi per l Integrazione dei Sistemi

Gatwick Airport Limited Technical Report in response to Airports Commission Consultation Congestion Charge

Improving public transport decision making, planning and operations by using Big Data

Traffic Light Coordination - Impacts on mobility

UNIVERSITY TRAVEL POLICY Effective immediately.

Cardiff Council Travel Planning Resources A Guide to Travel Surveys. A Guide to Travel Surveys

Welcome to Bremen. Michael Glotz-Richter, Senior Project Manager Sustainable Mobility, Free Hanseatic City of Bremen

The deployment of public transport innovation in European cities and regions. Ivo Cré, Polis

The mission of the Division of Transit Services is to provide an effective mix of public transportation services in Montgomery County.

Residential Development Travel Plan

Student Transportation Policies and Procedures

Tripp Umbach developed a detailed survey with input from the PDP and distributed the survey to six Downtown Pittsburgh market segments:

BIG DATA FOR MODELLING 2.0

LLITM Public Transport Supply Model

Ideal Public Transport Fares

PRIORITY SCHEDULING OF URBAN REHABILITATION STREETS TO MINIMIZE CONGESTION, DELAYS, AND ACCIDENTS

PEDESTRIAN PLANNING AND DESIGN MARK BRUSSEL

4. Meetings Financial Support

Keeping Glasgow and your

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY

An Automated Transport Management System

What are the physical characteristics of York? Why problems do you think there could be in York use map evidence.

Dr. Kamal Shoar, Head of Transport Planning Department

Transportation Information

Economic Impact. of Public Transportation Investment 2014 UPDATE

Analysis of Traffic Patterns for Large Scale Outdoor Events A Case Study of Vasaloppet Ski Event in Sweden

CHAPTER 8: INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION STSTEMS (ITS)

Smart Transport ITS Norway

Transcription:

A TRANSPORT MODEL FOR THE ATHENS OLYMPIC GAMES 2004 Anna Anastasaki, Modeling and Planning Manager, Attiko Metro S.A., Greece. Demetrios Panayiotakopoulos, GIS Expert, Attiko Metro S.A., Greece. 11 th EUROPEAN EMME/2 USER S GROUP CONFERENCE 2002, MADRID, SPAIN

Model Structure (EMME/2) HIGHWAY NETWORK PLANNING FACTORS PUBLIC TRANSPORT (PT) NETWORK HIGHWAY MINIMUM COST PATHS GENERALISED COST CAR, TAXI HB TRIP GENERATION PRODUCTIONS/ATTRACTIONS DAILY TRIPS GENERALISED COST PER PT MODE ( Bus, Metro) PT MINIMUM COST PATHS SUB-MODE CHOICE MODEL PT GENERALISED COST MAIN MODE CHOICE MODEL TRIP DISTRIBUTION EXTERNAL TRIPS MATRIX CONVERSION ORIGIN-DESTINATION (O-D) NHB TRIPS MOTORCYCLES, TRUCKS HIGHWAY ASSIGNMENT PCU VEHICLE O-D TRIP TABLE PT PASSENGER O-D TRIP TABLE PT ASSIGNMENT NO SATISFACTORY CONVERGENCE YES FINAL HIGHWAY ASSIGNMENT FINAL PT ASSIGNMENT YES SATISFACTORY CONVERGENCE NO

Socioeconomic Data 1996 2004 Diff (%) Population (mill.) 3,66 3,69 0,8% Car Ownership Index (cars/1000 inh.) 248 333 34,3%

Daily Trips 1996 2004 Diff (%) Total (mill.) 4,24 4,69 10,5% Car 51% 56% Taxi 15% 13% Public Transport 34% 31%

Basic Parameters * 1996 2004 Diff (%) Value of Time 550 drs 660 drs +20% Car Operating Cost 30 drs/km 30 drs/km 0% Public Transport Fare 75 drs 125 drs +67% Taxi Fare 200 drs 33 drs/min 200 drs 33 drs/min 0% 0% Tolls - 470 drs - (*) in 1996 prices

Public Transport Fare Policy * Urban Buses/ Trolley Metro Tram Commuter Rail Suburban Buses Line 1 (ISAP) Lines 2 & 3 (??) Airport Line Northern and Western Attica Lines 150 150 / 250 250 250 250 / 900 500 600 (*) in 2001 drs

Network Scenarios Basic Do-minimum More realistic

Road Projects

Public Transport Projects

Olympic Trips Category Spectators Employees (1) Employees (2) Sponsors IOC Cars Broadcasters Cars ATHENS 2004 Cars Athletes Mass Media Period 1 Arrivals 110,470 13,443 20,343 9,210 2,500 2,400 2,500 Period 2 Period 3 Arrivals Departures Departures 89,357 21,019 77,803-4,033 17,114-8,363 14,241 6,160 1,821 5,243 2,000 500 2,500 2,400-2,400-2,500 - Day: Day: 20/8/2004 20/8/2004 Time Time Periods: Periods: 11 8-9 8-9 am am 22 17-18 17-18 pm pm 33 22-23 22-23 pm pm

Olympic Trips: Spectators From Athens 30% From the rest of Greece 20% Foreigners 50% hotels in Attica (16%) hotels outside Attica (24%) private homes (60%)

Olympic Trips: O-D Matrices Distribution to the zones of Attica population of zone average income of zone available beds at hotels Distribution to Venues capacity of Venue O-D Matrix using Gravity Model generalized cost of trip popularity of sport Modal Split 90% PT 10% PM

Private Modes Demand (PCUs / h) Period Car + Taxi + Moto A B Trucks Total 1 149,578 12,087 29,476 191,921 2 107,271 10,460 22,819 140,923 3 68,674 7,325 3,870 79,968 A. Non-olympic trips B. Olympic trips

Traffic Volumes on the Road Network Period 1

Traffic Volumes on the Road Network Period 2

Traffic Volumes on the Road Network Period 3

Public Transport Demand (person trips / h) Period A Demand B Total 1 110,350 148,906 259,256 2 55,299 130,085 185,384 3 17,250 111,915 129,165 A. Non-olympic trips B. Olympic trips

Public Transport Ridership per Mode Mode Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Metro 144,727 100,361 80,844 Tram 6,910 2,059 1,083 Commuter Rail 45,680 18,975 14,616 Urban Bus / Trolley 199,612 133,373 90,121 Suburban Bus 22,315 19,614 12,831 Olympic Bus Lines 75,598 66,580 51,614 Total 494,842 340,962 251,109

Passenger Volumes on the Rail Network Period 1

Passenger Volumes on the Rail Network Period 2

Passenger Volumes on the Rail Network Period 3

Passenger Volumes on the Olympic Bus Lines Period 1

Passenger Volumes on the Olympic Bus Lines Period 2

Passenger Volumes on the Olympic Bus Lines Period 3

Required Fleet Mode of Transport Metro Tram Commuter Rail Urban Bus / Trolley Suburban Bus Olympic Bus Lines Buses for Mass Media Buses for Athletes Buses for Sponsors Period 1 64 18 26 1,507 209 520 272 70 350 Period 2 Period 3 64 64 18 18 26 26 1,340 1,289 195 189 463 450 247 249 59 55 283 199

Route Times/Speeds From / To Olympic Village To / From: OAKA SEF Helliniko Markopoulo Shinias Period 1 Time (min) 16 25 39 40 Arrivals Speed (km/hr) 53 61 51 61 Period 2 Arrivals/Departures Time (min) 14 / 16 19 / 27 29 / 35 32 / 39 Speed (km/hr) 61 / 57 78 / 60 70 / 58 77 / 64 Period 3 Departures Time (min) 21 21 29 35 Speed (km/hr) 38 55 32 / 30 64 / 69 30 70 42 75 70 71

Olympic Ring and Primary Olympic Road Network Conclusions : extended sections highly congested Metro Line 1 : max V/C = 1.41 1.59 Tram Line : at-capacity (max V/C = 0.91) Commuter Rail Airport Line : max V/C = 5.97 Other Lines : max V/C 2,0 Olympic Bus Lines : over-capacity (max V/C = 4.66) Suburban Bus Lines : over-capacity Bus Fleet : sufficient * Route times and speeds : need improvement (*) based on so-far assumptions

Further Investigation Readjustment of Olympic Bus Lines Routes and Headways Support / ease Metro Line 1 and Airport Rail Line Exclusive Olympic Lanes (one or two?) Rescheduling of Northern and Western Rail Lines Rescheduling of Suburban Bus Lines New Requirements in Bus Fleet Park and Ride Facilities Demand Management Travel Demand needs for other days and periods

A TRANSPORT MODEL FOR THE ATHENS OLYMPIC GAMES 2004 Anna Anastasaki Modeling and Planning Manager Demetrios Panayiotakopoulos GIS Expert