Module 4: Buckling of 2D Simply Supported Beam

Similar documents
Tutorial for Assignment #2 Gantry Crane Analysis By ANSYS (Mechanical APDL) V.13.0

Piston Ring. Problem:

AN INTRODUCTORY ANSYS TUTORIAL: SOLVING A STATIC TRUSS PROBLEM

University of Alberta ANSYS Tutorials - Space Frame Example

COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING OF FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATION USING ABAQUS

Begin creating the geometry by defining two Circles for the spherical endcap, and Subtract Areas to create the vessel wall.

Tutorial for Assignment #3 Heat Transfer Analysis By ANSYS (Mechanical APDL) V.13.0

ANSYS TUTORIAL ANSYS 8.1 Analysis of a Spring System. John R. Baker; phone: ; jbaker@engr.uky.edu

Introduction to Solid Modeling Using SolidWorks 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial Page 1

Solved with COMSOL Multiphysics 4.3

Finite Element Formulation for Plates - Handout 3 -

List of Problems Solved Introduction p. 1 Concept p. 1 Nodes p. 3 Elements p. 4 Direct Approach p. 5 Linear Spring p. 5 Heat Flow p.

ANSYS Example: Transient Thermal Analysis of a Pipe Support Bracket

The elements used in commercial codes can be classified in two basic categories:

Shell Elements in ABAQUS/Explicit

Getting Started with ANSYS ANSYS Workbench Environment

Customer Training Material. ANSYS Mechanical Basics. Mechanical. ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2010 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. WS2.

ABAQUS/CAE Tutorial: Analysis of an Aluminum Bracket

Embankment Consolidation

Plates and Shells: Theory and Computation - 4D9 - Dr Fehmi Cirak (fc286@) Office: Inglis building mezzanine level (INO 31)

Linear Static Analysis of a Cantilever Beam Using Beam Library (SI Units)

Tower Cross Arm Numerical Analysis

Lap Fillet Weld Calculations and FEA Techniques

Finite Elements for 2 D Problems

Back to Elements - Tetrahedra vs. Hexahedra

Finite Element Method (ENGC 6321) Syllabus. Second Semester

An Overview of the Finite Element Analysis

STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF CENTER CRACKED FINITE PLATE SUBJECTED TO UNIFORM TENSILE STRESS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

The Basics of FEA Procedure

PRO-MECHANICA. Lesson One < Structural > Beam Cantilever Beam

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Finite Element Formulation for Beams - Handout 2 -

Instructors Manual Finite Element Method Laboratory Sessions

Applying a circular load. Immediate and consolidation settlement. Deformed contours. Query points and query lines. Graph query.

Course in. Nonlinear FEM

NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS (N.T.U.A.)

Mesh Discretization Error and Criteria for Accuracy of Finite Element Solutions

Learning Module 6 Linear Dynamic Analysis

Elasticity Theory Basics

Nonlinear analysis and form-finding in GSA Training Course

Nonlinear Analysis Using Femap with NX Nastran

Course in. FEM ANSYS Classic

CATIA V5 FEA Tutorials Releases 12 & 13

Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Biological Materials

Visualization of 2D Domains

3 Concepts of Stress Analysis

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

ABAQUS Tutorial. 3D Modeling

CAE -Finite Element Method

Solved with COMSOL Multiphysics 4.0a. COPYRIGHT 2010 COMSOL AB.

Reliable FE-Modeling with ANSYS

Understand the Sketcher workbench of CATIA V5.

8.2 Elastic Strain Energy

CHAPTER 3. INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX METHODS FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

MEMS Multiphysics Simulation in ANSYS Workbench David Harrar II, PhD Ozen Engineering, Inc.

2.3 Example: creating a model of an overhead hoist with ABAQUS/CAE

CosmosWorks Centrifugal Loads

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

CATIA V5 Tutorials. Mechanism Design & Animation. Release 18. Nader G. Zamani. University of Windsor. Jonathan M. Weaver. University of Detroit Mercy

*Currently employed at UTAS, work for this paper was carried out while the author was formerly employed at MSC Software.

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

Tutorial: 3D Pipe Junction Using Hexa Meshing

Learning Module 5 Buckling Analysis

An Introduction to Stress Analysis Applications with SolidWorks Simulation, Instructor Guide

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO METHODOLOGIES FOR NON LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF KNIFE EDGE GATE VALVE SLEEVE

Workshop. Tennis Racket Simulation using Abaqus

NAPA/MAESTRO Interface. Reducing the Level of Effort for Ship Structural Design

INJECTION MOLDING COOLING TIME REDUCTION AND THERMAL STRESS ANALYSIS

Technical Report Example (1) Chartered (CEng) Membership

Laminar Flow in a Baffled Stirred Mixer

A Comparison of All Hexagonal and All Tetrahedral Finite Element Meshes for Elastic and Elasto-plastic Analysis

Deflections. Question: What are Structural Deflections?

Strip Flatness Prediction in a 4 High Tandem Mill Using a Dynamic Model.

ESCUELA TÉCNICA SUPERIOR DE INGENIEROS INDUSTRIALES Y DE TELECOMUNICACIÓN

Introduction to COMSOL. The Navier-Stokes Equations

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Design Analysis and Review of Stresses at a Point

CHAPTER 4 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS

PREDICTION OF MACHINE TOOL SPINDLE S DYNAMICS BASED ON A THERMO-MECHANICAL MODEL

TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FORCED CONVECTION FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER IN A LAMINAR CHANNEL FLOW

An introduction to 3D draughting & solid modelling using AutoCAD

Tutorial for laboratory project #2 Using ANSYS Workbench. For Double Pipe Heat Exchanger

ICEM CFD Tutorial. Simple Duct Grid

Add-on Module STEEL EC3. Ultimate Limit State, Serviceability, Fire Resistance, and Stability Analyses According. Program Description

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS

Burst Pressure Prediction of Pressure Vessel using FEA

CAE -Finite Element Method

Cylinder Head Gasket Contact Pressure Simulation for a Hermetic Compressor

Analysis of Stresses and Strains

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION... 5 Advance Concrete... 5 Where to find information?... 6 INSTALLATION... 7 STARTING ADVANCE CONCRETE...

Benchmark Tests on ANSYS Parallel Processing Technology

Optimising plate girder design

(Seattle is home of Boeing Jets)

Creating a Poster in PowerPoint A. Set Up Your Poster

MCE380: Measurements and Instrumentation Lab. Chapter 9: Force, Torque and Strain Measurements

Trace Layer Import for Printed Circuit Boards Under Icepak

ME Week 11 Introduction to Dynamic Simulation

Vibrations of a Free-Free Beam

Steady Flow: Laminar and Turbulent in an S-Bend

. Address the following issues in your solution:

Transcription:

Module 4: Buckling of D Simply Supported Beam Table of Contents Page Number Problem Description Theory Geometry 4 Preprocessor 7 Element Type 7 Real Constants and Material Properties 8 Meshing 9 Solution 11 Static Solution 11 Eigenvalue 14 Mode Shape 1 General Postprocessor 1 Results 18 Validation 18 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 1

Problem Description: y x Nomenclature: L =00mm b =10mm h =1 mm P=1N E=00,000 Length of beam Cross Section Base Cross Section Height Applied Force =0. Poisson s Ratio of Steel Young s Modulus of Steel at Room Temperature Moment of Inertia This module is a simply supported beam subject to two opposite edge compressions until the material buckles. Buckling is inherently non-linear, but we linearize the problem through the Eigenvalue method. This solution is an overestimate of the theoretical value since it does not consider imperfections and nonlinearities in the structure such as warping and manufacturing defects. We model the beam with D elements. Theory Buckling load Hooke s Law equates stress as shown: (4.1) Deriving both sides of equation.1 it shows (4.) By solving for equilibrium: (4.) Equation. is a nonlinear equation, however this equation can be linearized using eigenvalues. UCONN ANSYS Module Page

Since: (4.4) Then: Plugging in Equation.1 for stress we find: (4.) (4.) Plugging Equation. into Equation., Equation. becomes (4.7) Which is simplifies to: (4.8) By integrating two times Equation.8 becomes (4.9) At the fixed end (x=0), v=0,, thus 0 At the supported end (x=l), v=0,, thus 0 Equation.9 becomes (4.10) Equation. represents the Differential Equation for a Sin Wave (4.11) A and B are arbitrary constants which are calculated based on Boundary Conditions. At the fixed end (x=0), v=0 proving B=0. Equation.11 becomes But A cannot equal zero or this problem is trivial. At the supported end (x=l), v=0 Equation 1 becomes (4.1) (4.1) Since A cannot equal zero, ( ) must equal zero: Sin(nπ)=0 for n=(0, 1,,, 4..) UCONN ANSYS Module Page

So: n 0 or it is trivial (4.14) We are interested in finding P which is the Critical Buckling Load. Since n can be any integer greater than zero and a continuous beam has theoretically infinite degrees of freedom there are infinite amount of eigenvalues ( ). Where the lowest Buckling Load is at This is an over estimate so there are certain correction factors (C) to account for this. (C) is dependent on the beam constraints. Where C=1 for a fixed-simply supported beam. So the Critical Buckling Load is (4.1) (4.1) (4.17) = 41.14 N (4.18) Geometry Opening ANSYS Mechanical APDL 1. On your Windows 7 Desktop click the Start button. Under Search Programs and Files type ANSYS. Click on Mechanical APDL (ANSYS) to start ANSYS. This step may take time. 1 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 4

Preferences 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preferences. Check the box that says Structural. Click OK 1 Title: To add a title 1. Utility Menu -> ANSYS Toolbar -> type /prep7 -> enter. Utility Menu -> ANSYS Toolbar -> type /Title, Title Name -> enter UCONN ANSYS Module Page

Key points Since we will be using D Elements, our goal is to model the length and width of the beam. 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Modeling -> Create -> Keypoints -> On Working Plane. Click Global Cartesian. In the box underneath, write: 0,0,0 This will create a keypoint at the Origin. 4. Click Apply. Repeat Steps and 4 for the following points in order: 0,0,10 00,0,10 00,0,0. Click Ok 7. The Triad in the top left corner is blocking keypoint 1. To get rid of the triad, type /triad,off in Utility Menu -> Command Prompt 7 8. Go to Utility Menu -> Plot -> Replot Areas 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Modeling -> Create -> Areas -> Arbitrary -> Through KPs. Select Pick. Select Min, Max, Inc 4. In the space below, type 1,4,1. If you are familiar with programming, the Min,Max, Inc acts as a FOR loop, connecting nodes 1 through 4 incrementing (Inc) by 1.. Click OK. Go to Plot -> Areas 7. Click the Top View tool 4 UCONN ANSYS Module Page

Your beam should look as below: Saving Geometry We will be using the geometry we have just created for modules. Thus it would be convenient to save the geometry so that it does not have to be made again from scratch. 1. Go to File -> Save As. Under Save Database to pick a name for the Geometry. For this tutorial, we will name the file Buckling simply supported. Under Directories: pick the Folder you would like to save the.db file to. 4. Click OK 4 Preprocessor Element Type 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Element Type -> Add/Edit/Delete. Click Add. Click Shell -> 4node181 4. Click OK 4 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 7

SHELL181 is suitable for analyzing thin to moderately-think shell structures. It is a 4-node element with six degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the x, y, and z directions, and rotations about the x, y, and z-axes. (If the membrane option is used, the element has translational degrees of freedom only). The degenerate triangular option should only be used as filler elements in mesh generation. This element is well-suited for linear, large rotation, and/or large strain nonlinear applications. Change in shell thickness is accounted for in nonlinear analyses. In the element domain, both full and reduced integration schemes are supported. SHELL181 accounts for follower (load stiffness) effects of distributed pressures Real Constants and Material Properties Now we will add the thickness to our beam. 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Real Constants -> Add/Edit/Delete. Click Add. Click OK 4. Under Real Constants for SHELL18 -> Shell thickness at node I TK(I) enter 1 for the thickness. Click OK. Click Close 4 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 8

Now we must specify Young s Modulus and Poisson s Ratio 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Material Props -> Material Models. Go to Material Model Number 1 -> Structural -> Linear -> Elastic -> Isotropic. Input E for the Young s Modulus (Steel in mm) in EX. 4. Input 0. for Poisson s Ratio in PRXY. Click OK. of Define Material Model Behavior window 4 Meshing 1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Meshing -> Mesh Tool. Go to Size Controls: -> Global -> Set. Under NDIV No. of element divisions put. This will create a mesh of elements across the smallest thickness, 4 in total. 4. Click OK. Click Mesh. Click Pick All 4 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 9

7. Go to Utility Menu -> Plot -> Nodes 8. Go to Utility Menu -> Plot Controls -> Numbering 9. Check NODE Node Numbers to ON 10. Click OK 9 10 The resulting graphic should be as shown using the Top View : This is one of the main advantages of ANSYS Mechanical APDL vs ANSYS Workbench in that we can visually extract the node numbering scheme. As shown, ANSYS numbers nodes at the left corner, the right corner, followed by filling in the remaining nodes from left to right. UCONN ANSYS Module Page 10

Solution There are two types of solution menus that ANSYS APDL provides; the Abridged solution menu and the Unabridged solution menu. Before specifying the loads on the beam, it is crucial to be in the correct menu. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Unabridged menu This is shown as the last tab in the Solution menu. If this reads Abridged menu you are already in the Unabridged solution menu. Static Solution Analysis Type 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Analysis Type -> New Analysis. Choose Static. Click OK 4. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Analysis Type ->Analysis Options. Under [SSTIF][PSTRES] Stress stiffness or prestress select Prestress ON. Click OK Prestress is the only change necessary in this window and it is a crucial step in obtaining a final result for eigenvalue buckling. UCONN ANSYS Module Page 11

Displacement 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution ->Define Loads ->Apply -> Structural ->Displacement -> On Nodes. Select Min, Max, Inc. In the space below, type 1,,1. If you are familiar with programming, the Min,Max, Inc acts as a FOR loop, connecting nodes 1 through incrementing by 1. This selects the nodes on the far left of the beam 9 4. Click OK. Under Lab DOFs to be constrained select UX, UY and ROTX. Under VALUE Displacement value enter 0 7 7. Click OK 8. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Define Loads ->Apply ->Structural -> Displacement -> On Nodes 9. Select Pick -> Box 10. Box nodes: 4, 4 and 44 (far right nodes) 11. Click OK 1. Under Lab DOFs to be constrained highlight UY and ROTX 1. Under VALUE Displacement value enter 0 14. Click OK 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Define Loads ->Apply ->Structural -> Displacement -> On Nodes 1. Select Pick -> Single 17. Select nodes and 4 (one node on the left of the beam and one node on the right) 18. Under Lab DOFs to be constrained highlight UZ 19. Under VALUE Displacement value enter 0 UCONN ANSYS Module Page 1

0. Click OK This creates the fixed end on the left and roller support on the right, while constraining movement in the Z-direction WARNING: UX, UY and ROTX might already be highlighted, if so, leave UY and ROTX highlighted and click UX to remove it from the selection. Failure to only constrain UY and ROTX will result in incorrect results. Loads 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Define Loads -> Apply -> Structural ->Force/Moment -> On Nodes. Select Pick -> Single -> List of Items. In the space provided, type 4. Press OK. 4. Under Direction of force/mom select FX. Under VALUE Force/moment value enter -1 4. Click OK USEFUL TIP: The force value is only a magnitude of 1 because eigenvalues are calculated by a factor of the load applied, so having a force of 1 will make the eigenvalue answer equal to the critical load. UCONN ANSYS Module Page 1

Solve 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Solve -> Current LS. Go to Main Menu -> Finish Eigenvalue 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Analysis Type -> New Analysis. Choose Eigen Buckling. Click OKGo to Main Menu -> Solution -> Analysis Type ->Analysis Options 4. Under NMODE No. of modes to extract input 4. Click OK. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Solve -> Current LS 7. Go to Main Menu -> Finish UCONN ANSYS Module Page 14

Mode Shape 1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Analysis Type -> ExpansionPass. Click [EXPASS] Expansion pass to ensure this is turned on. Click OK 4. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Load Step Opts -> ExpansionPass -> Single Expand -> Expand Modes. Under NMODE No. of modes to expand input 4. Click OK 7. Go to Main Menu -> Solution -> Solve -> Current LS 8. Go to Main Menu -> Finish UCONN ANSYS Module Page 1

General Postprocessor Buckling Load Now that ANSYS has solved these three analysis lets extract the lowest eigenvalue. This represents the lowest force to cause buckling. Go to Main Menu -> General Postproc -> List Results -> Detailed Summary Results for Buckling Load: P= 41.17 N Mode Shape To view the deformed shape of the buckled beam vs. original beam: 1. Go to Main Menu -> General Postproc -> Read Results -> By Pick. Select the lowest Eigenvalue: Set 1 -> Click Read UCONN ANSYS Module Page 1

. Click Close 4. Go to Main Menu -> General Postproc -> Plot Results -> Deformed Shape. Under KUND Items to be plotted select Def + undeformed. Click OK The graphics area should look as below using the Oblique view: UCONN ANSYS Module Page 17

Results The percent error (%E) in our model can be defined as: ( ) = 0.1% This shows that there is no error baseline using one dimensional elements. Validation Critical Buckling Load Theoretical 0 Elements 80 Elements 4 Elements 41.14 N 41.14 41.17 7.19 Percent Error 0%.048% 0.1%.4% This table provides the critical buckling loads and corresponding error from the Theory (Euler), and two different ANSYS results; one with 80 elements and one with 4 elements. This is to prove mesh independence, showing with increasing mesh size, the answer approaches the theoretical value. The results here show that using a coarse mesh of 4 elements creates an unacceptable error. As mesh is refined it converges to a more accurate answer. The eigenvalue buckling method over-estimates the real life buckling load. This is due to the assumption of a perfect structure, disregarding flaws and nonlinearities in the material. There is no such thing as a perfect structure so the structure will never actually reach the eigenvalue load that is calculated. Thus, it is important to consider conservative factors of safety into your design for safe measure. UCONN ANSYS Module Page 18