Zoning and Development Regulations

Similar documents
Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

Division Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations.

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

CONFORMITY WITH PLANS; DRAINAGE.

Neighborhood Business. Neighborhood Mixed Use. Community Business. Factoria Land Use District 1 2A 2A 2A 30 (23) 15 (23) 30 (23) 30 (23)

Neighborhood Planning Guide To Zoning

FOR SALE. The Friedman Building th Avenue South, Seattle Nicholas T. Gill Allan Friedman

Kirkland Zoning Code

KEYPORT COMMUNITY PLAN

REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT

City Code of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Chapter 55 Zoning

Churches and Schools Development Standards

d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls.

PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION


CPED STAFF REPORT Prepared for the City Planning Commission

Assisted Living & Memory Care

County of San Diego, Planning & Development Services SECOND DWELLING UNIT

SECTION 5 RESIDENTIAL R1 ZONE

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

BEACON AVENUE URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT

NOTICE OF A TYPE Ix DECISION ON A PROPOSAL IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD

Financial Analysis for the Ambleside Centre Zoning Districts

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, Debbie Hill, Associate Planner 9386-A1

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810

sdci Seattle Permits Tip Tree Protection Regulations in Seattle CATEGORIES OF TREES AFFECTED IDENTIFYING TREE TYPES ON YOUR PROPERTY

Zoning Districts, Gwinnett County, Georgia

CHAPTER 5 - "R1" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

Appendix A: Affordable Housing Site Inventory

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 5 RR - Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

A-2, RURAL ESTATE-AGRICULTURE DISTRICT

A. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted by right in the C-2 zone, subject to the limitations specified:

CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA CHAPTER 30, ZONING, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA (ADOPTED NOVEMBER 9, 2015)

Staff Report General Development Plan/Master Plan Aldermanic District: 1 County Commission District: 2 MPC File No PLAN February 23, 2016

FILING REQUIREMENTS EXCERPTS FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

CITY OF NORMANDY PARK MANHATTAN VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA STRATEGY AND CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN

FORMULA FOR FINDING THE SQUARE FEET OF A RECTANGLE L x W = A

B. Improve the appearance and character of areas surrounding new development.

THE APPRAISAL OF REAL ESTATE 3 RD CANADIAN EDITION BUSI 330

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Scenario Planning Report. Austin South Shore Central

ADMINISTRATIVE LAND SPLIT APPLICATION

Planning and Zoning Commission Johnston, Iowa June 29, 2015

City of Mandeville. Guidelines for Construction and Development

LAND USE CODE CHAPTER GENERAL REGULATIONS

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended

Town of Surf City Community Development. General Permit Information

City of Tampa Zoning Districts

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

Residential Accessory Buildings

Mission Canyon Residential Design Guidelines Workshop. Table Focus: Environmental Issues and Concerns

Corridor Goals and Objectives

PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS

Draft ARTICLE 20A "AO" ANTIETAM OVERLAY DISTRICT

Slope Density. Appendix F F-1 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE DISCUSSION OF SLOPE

Section 13 Urban Residential Zones

Washington City Subdivision Development Application Checklist

Planning Commission Staff Report

A PPENDICES C OLLIERVILLE 2040 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

3 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

9.0 Alta Vista/Faircrest Heights/Riverview Park (Key Principles)

HIGHLIGHTS: Heights in Residential Zoning Districts

DECISION/DIRECTION NOTE

The Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: May 19, 2015

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT. BOA File No West Avenue- Multifamily Building

SECTION 5 DRAFTING STANDARDS

ORDINANCE NO

LAND USE ELEMENT APPENDIX

For Lease Sale in in Kitsap County

SOLAR ENERGY FACILITIES ZONING AMENDMENTS

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

FILE NO.: Z-6915-C. Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request

FILE NO.: Z LOCATION: Located on the Northeast and Southeast corners of West 12 th Street and Dennison Street

City of Sugar Hill Planning Staff Report AX

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

R-40 Single-Family Residential

Required material for filing an appeal to the Board of Adjustment

Tree Work on District of West Vancouver Property

Zoning Guide* Contents. Section I Introduction page 2. Section II Residence Districts page 3. Section III Commercial Districts page 5

Weekend Cabin Retreat Project Site Plans

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

William S. Null Enclosures cc: Hon. Susanne Donnelly, Supervisor; Mr. Glen Vetromile; and Ms. Nanette Bourne

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT

R 1 Design Review Application

SERVICING REPORT SITE PLAN AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO

Transcription:

Zoning and Development Regulations 1. HISTORIC ZONING Prior to the adoption of this Plan, properties within the Manchester Village have experienced a variety of different zoning designations. These designations included Residential 3 Homes Per Acre (R-3), Residential 5 Homes Per Acre Mobile Home (R-5 MH), Rural Residential (RR), Business General (BG) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The densities and minimum lot sizes of these designations are shown in Table Z-1. Table Z-1 Historic Zoning Densities and Lot Sizes Zone Density Minimum Lot Size R-3 3 Dwelling Units/1acre.33 acre (14,520 sq. ft.) R-5 MH 5 Dwelling Units/1 acre.20 acre (8,712 sq. ft.) RR 1 Dwelling Unit/5 acres 5 acres (217,800 sq. ft) BG N/A N/A NC N/A N/A This variety of zoning designations combined with the extensive platting of Manchester at the beginning of the 1900 s has created a mixture of development patterns throughout the Manchester Village. The Plan will create zoning designations that will provide consistent and predictable regulations to further sensible development. 2. RESIDENTIAL ZONNG The Manchester Village will contain two residential designations (Figure 3): Manchester Village Residential (MVR) and Manchester Village Low Residential (MVLR). The zoning in each residential designation recognizes the existing pattern and intensity of development of its area. Uses allowed in these zones will be consistent with Urban Low Land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The complete list of zoning requirement and allowed uses are shown in Appendix C. Manchester Village Residential (MVR) This designation is applied to areas within the Manchester Village where the platting of parcels has been most intense, primarily along Alaska and California Avenues and in the downtown area. The average size for currently developed lots in these areas is just over.25 acres (10,890 sq. ft.). To acknowledge this historic development, the Plan sets both minimum developable and minimum

divisible lot sizes at.25 acres. The lot requirements and setbacks for this zone are shown in Table Z-2. Manchester Village Low Residential (MVLR) This designation is applied to areas within the Manchester Village where platting has occurred piece meal. Individual short plats over the years have created areas without consistent lot sizes. This development pattern is due to the changing zoning over the years and a lack of available services such as sewer and water. The average size for currently developed lots in these areas is just over.50 acres (21,780 sq. ft.), though several vacant smaller lots currently exist. To acknowledge these existing smaller lots, this designation s minimum developable lot size is set at.25 acre (10,890 sq. ft.) This designation s minimum divisible lot size is.50 acres. To develop lots smaller then.50, a property owner could cluster their development (see Cluster Development), which would allow lots as small as.25 acres with a set amount of open space. The lot requirements and setbacks for this zone are shown in Table Z-2. Zone Table Z-2 Lot Requirements and Setback for MVR and MLVR Zones MVR MVLR Minimum Developable.25 acre (10,890 sq. ft).25 acre (10,890 sq. ft.) Lot Size Minimum Divisible Lot size.25 acre (10,890 sq. ft).50 acre (21,780 sq. ft.) w/ clustering.25 (10,890 sq. ft.) Minimum Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Minimum Lot Depth 60 feet 60 feet Frontyard Setback 20 feet 20 feet Sideyard Setback 5 feet 5 feet Rearyard Setback 5 feet 5 feet Density DU/Acre 4 2 Manchester Village Lot Requirements 321.C.050 Density DU/Acre Minimum Lot Area MVR 4 10,890 sq. ft. MVLR 2 21,780 sq. ft. w/ Clustering 10,890 sq. Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Front Yard Side Yard Opposite Side Yard Rear Yard 60 feet 60 feet 20 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet 60 feet 60 feet 20 feet 5 feet 5 feet 5 feet

Minimum lot size for lots legally created prior to the adoption of the Manchester Plan (2002) may be built on however they need to conform to ALL other zoning requirements. Once the property is transferred or sold to new ownership that lot must meet minimum lot requirements as set forth in Table Z-2. Clustered Development The Manchester Village has historically developed in densely platted rectangles with little or no open space. It is this lack of open space combined with the removal of natural vegetation that has contributed to its stormwater problems. To encourage the retention of vegetated open space in the Manchester Village, The Plan will create a density bonus for clustered development. As an incentive to cluster, developers leaving 40% of their property in open space will be allowed an extra lot for every five lots they cluster. For example, a property owner with 5 acres in the Manchester Village Low Residential zone (.50 acre minimum divisible lot size), would normally only be able to subdivide into 10 parcels. No open space needs to be included and all of the acreage could be available for clearing. With clustered development, this owner would leave 40% of the five gross acres in open space and be allowed to subdivide the remaining land into 12 lots, each at the.25-acre minimum developable lot size. The public is guaranteed a portion of land that will be protected from clearing and in exchange the property owner is allowed two additional lots. Goals and Policies Goal RZ-1 Protect and enhance the Manchester Village character.

Goal RZ-2 Provide zoning that is consistent with Manchester s existing built environment and lot sizes that allow for financially viable sewer extentions. Policy RZ-1 Set minimum lot sizes for residential development shown in Table Z-2. Policy RZ-2 Set minimum lot sizes for residential property subdivision shown in Table Z-2 question Do we now remove this? Goal RZ-3 Encourage property owners to cluster all newly subdivided lots. Policy RZ-3 Provide a desity bonus for all future clustered developments of five (5) lots or more. 3. COMMERCIAL ZONING Manchester Village Commercial (MVC) This designation is applied to areas where historic commercial development has occurred and/or where future development is acceptable. The commercial uses in this zone are of modest intensity and are consistent with the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Such uses could include restaurants, dry cleaners, video stores, professional services, Laundromats and/or specialty stores. The Manchester Design Charrette focused on the area of downtown Manchester which was designated Neighborhood Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. The design team felt the size of this designation was inappropriate, too large for the current or future population of Manchester. They developed a range of alternative commercial boundaries showing how each could accommodate business suitable for Manchester.

Using the results of this process, the MVC designation was applied generally to the area between Daniels Loop on the north, Spring Street on the west, Spruce Street on the south, and Puget Sound on the east, EXCEPT most properties abutting Denniston Lane. (Fig. 3). Within this designated area, parking is a concern. The area is only partially developed and parking can be scarce on holiday weekends thoughout the summer. As the area continues to develop, the frequency of this problem will increase. To allow for additional parking to be incorporated into new commercial development, the Plan would modify the County s current parking requirements to a level commensurate with the uses allowed in this zone (Appendix C). To encourage two-story mixed-use development, the height restriction on commercial or missed-use properties within this zone will be set at 35 feet, measured from the average grade at the foundation to the structures highest point. To accommodate properties in this zone with existing residential-only uses, such properties will be allowed to rebuild, remodel or add-on, but when doing so must meet all the requirements of the Manchester Residential zone. Goals and Policies Goal CZ-1 Promote the establishment of a vital Manchester Village Commercial zone. Policy CZ-1 Establish a commercial zone appropriate for the population and transportation network of the Manchester Village. Policy CZ-2 Allow land uses consistent with the County s Neighborhood Commercial zoning designation. Goal CZ-2 Encourage mixed-use development within the commercial zone.

Policy CZ-3 Modify parking requirements to levels appropriate for the Manchester Village Policy CZ-4 Encourage the development of design standards for the Manchester Village commercial zone. In refining and adoption stage. Policy CZ-5 Allow structures within the Manchester Village Commercial zone to achieve a height of 35 feet with limit of two stories. 4. VIEW PROTECTION One of Manchester s unique features is its expansive views of many scenic areas. From many properties in Manchester, views of Mt. Rainier, the Cascade Mountain Range, Puget Sound and the Seattle skyline are clearly visible. These views are of great value and importance to the Manchester Community. These views have been impaired over the years by new building construction and the growth of view-obstructing vegetation. In an effort to reduce the future impacts of these obstruction, the Plan proposes regulations restricting the height of new residential construction and restricts the planting of row trees and other vegetation in a way that will significantly impact existing views. View Protection Overlay Zone Within the Manchester Village Boundary, a View protection Overlay Zone (VPOZ) has been established. Contained within this Zone are all properties between the U.S. Naval Fuel Depot to the north, the westerly properties abutting Alaska Ave. to the west, Mile Hill Dr. to the south and Puget Sound to the East (Figure 4). The following regulations will only apply to the residentially zoned properties located within the VPOZ. Height Restrictions In the past many lots in Manchester have had their views significantly impacted by construction built to the County s existing 35-foot height

restriction. These impacts have exacerbated by property owner s building at their properties highest points. Adjacent neighbors have seen their views blocked, often in their entirety, by this kind of construction. This Plan would impose a lower height restriction while encouraging property owners to build as far down their slope as possible. The maximum height of all new construction would be reduced from 35 feet to 28 feet measured from the mid-slope point of the property s buildable area to the highest point of the structure. To establish the mid-point : a property survey by a licensed surveyor is required the 4 corners of the site are established the mid-point of buildable space is established by averaging the four building corner elevations with the maximum roof height. this process is done on the natural contour of the lot before any alterations. This restriction would apply to new construction as well as additions and remodels to existing structures. Buildable area is defined as the area in which the structure is actually positioned on the lot and including the setback requirement of the building code. The further property owners build down the slope, the higher the structures can be while maintaining the 28-foot restriction. The opposite is also true; the further upslope property owners build the lower their structures must be to meet the restriction. While this regulation will not remove all instances of new structures blocking existing views, it will reduce their frequency. Vegetation Restrictions While new construction usually only impacts adjacent properties, the impacts of certain kinds of vegetation are often much greater. Many trees and large shrubs can grow significantly higher, blocking the views of numerous property owners upslope. The impact is heightened when these trees and shrubs are planted in rows. But, while these trees

obstruct views, they also provide significant wildlife habitat and reduce stormwater volumes. To balance these issues, the Plan sets a vegetation restriction on row trees and shrubs. After the adoption of the Plan, newly planted row trees (three or more) and shrubbery such as hedges may not be maintained in a way that significantly impacts existing views from neighboring properties. All existing vegetation is exempt from thos restriction. While this regulation will not remove all instances of new vegetation blocking existing views, it will reduce their frequency. Goal and Policies Goal VP-1 Protect Manchester s existing views of Mt. Rainier, the Cascade Mountain Range, Puget Sound and the Seattle skyline. Policy VP-1 Establish a View Protection Overlay Zone for the Manchester Village Goal VP-2 Encourage development that creates the least impact to existing views. Policy VP-2 Establish a maximum structure height for residential development within the View Protection Overlay Zone. A structures height will be measured from the midslope of a property s buildable area to encourage development downslope.